1
|
Gallamini A, Filippi A, Camus V, Vassilakopoulos TP. Toward a paradigm shift in prognostication and treatment of early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2024. [PMID: 39039814 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Twenty years after the conceptual revolution that occurred in the millennium turnaround upon the introduction of PET/CT in lymphoma staging, restaging, and prognostication, a number of new parameters for PET reading have been proposed: (1) the shift from a qualitative to a semi-quantitative reading for PET reporting, (2) an international consensus on these novel interpretation keys, (3) a standardized and agreed procedure to measure the total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV), and (4) the proposition of new indexes to portray the tumour spread: (D-Max and Total Lesion Surface -TLS). These proved to be very powerful prognosticators, able to revolutionize the traditional Ann Arbor four-stage lymphoma staging. During the 17° Lugano meeting on lymphoma, one main question was asked to experts attending a closed workshop dedicated to new metrics for lymphoma diagnosis, staging, restaging, and prognostication: "Should the traditional 4-stage anatomic staging system be simplified to a more clinically relevant 2-stage system (e.g., limited vs. extensive disease)?" Early-stage HL is an example of how these new metrics could fit with this proposal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gallamini
- Research and Clinical Innovation, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, Nice, France
| | - Andrea Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincent Camus
- Institute of Oncology Research, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Department of Haematology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Theodoros P Vassilakopoulos
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saifi O, Hoppe BS. Contemporary radiation therapy use in Hodgkin lymphoma. Semin Hematol 2024:S0037-1963(24)00070-2. [PMID: 38897840 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Radiation therapy assumes a pivotal role in Hodgkin lymphoma management, especially within combined modality therapy. It serves as a cornerstone in early-stage disease and in mitigating high-risk instances of local relapse in advanced stages. Over recent decades, radiation therapy has undergone significant advancements, notably alongside diagnostic imaging improvements, facilitating the reduction of radiation field size and dosage. This progress has notably led to minimized toxicity while upholding treatment efficacy. This comprehensive review extensively evaluates the indications and advancements in radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma, with a primary focus on enhancing treatment efficacy while minimizing radiation-related toxicities. The exploration encompasses a detailed examination of various radiation fields, techniques and delivery modalities employed in Hodgkin lymphoma treatment, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and proton therapy. It delves into the intricacies of optimal dose selection and treatment planning strategies aimed at achieving maximal disease control while concurrently minimizing the risk of long-term side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omran Saifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rosenbrock J, Kaul H, Oertel M, Celik E, Linde P, Fan J, Eichenauer DA, Bröckelmann PJ, von Tresckow B, Kobe C, Dietlein M, Fuchs M, Borchmann P, Eich HT, Baues C. Involved-site Radiation Therapy is Equally Effective and Less Toxic Than Involved-field Radiation Therapy in Patients Receiving Combined Modality Treatment for Early-stage Unfavorable Hodgkin Lymphoma-An Analysis of the Randomized Phase 3 HD17 Trial of the German Hodgkin Study Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00514-5. [PMID: 38631539 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Combined modality treatment with chemotherapy followed by consolidation radiation therapy (RT) provides excellent outcomes for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The international standard of care for consolidation RT, involved-site/involved-node radiation therapy (ISRT/INRT), has never been evaluated in a randomized phase 3 trial against the former standard involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS In the multicenter phase 3 GHSG (German Hodgkin Study Group) HD17 trial, patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma were randomized between the standard Combined modality treatment group and a positron-emission tomography (PET)-guided group. In the standard group, patients received 2 cycles of escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) and 2 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by 30 Gy IFRT. In the experimental group, patients received no further therapy if postchemotherapy PET was negative and 30 Gy GHSG INRT, comparable to and therefore termed here ISRT, if PET was positive. Here, we analyze the interim PET-positive patients in a post hoc analysis, and therefore the randomized comparison of IFRT versus INRT/ISRT. RESULTS A total of 1100 patients were randomized, of which 311 had a positive PET after chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 4-year progression-free survival were 96.8% (95% CI, 91.6%-98.8%) in the IFRT group and 95.4% (95% CI, 89.9%-97.9%; HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.44-4.42) in the ISRT group. The pattern of recurrence analyses indicated that none of the cases of disease progression or recurrence in the ISRT group would have been prevented by the use of IFRT. Acute grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 8.5% of IFRT patients and 2.6% of ISRT patients (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS For the first time, consolidation INRT/ISRT was randomly compared with IFRT in a phase 3 trial. Regarding progression-free survival, no advantage of IFRT could be demonstrated. In summary, our data confirm the status of INRT/ISRT as the current standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Rosenbrock
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Helen Kaul
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Oertel
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Eren Celik
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Linde
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jiaqi Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dennis A Eichenauer
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Paul J Bröckelmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Radiation Oncology, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoppe RT, Advani RH, Ai WZ, Ambinder RF, Armand P, Bello CM, Benitez CM, Chen W, Dabaja B, Daly ME, Gordon LI, Hansen N, Herrera AF, Hochberg EP, Johnston PB, Kaminski MS, Kelsey CR, Kenkre VP, Khan N, Lynch RC, Maddocks K, McConathy J, Metzger M, Morgan D, Mulroney C, Pullarkat ST, Rabinovitch R, Rosenspire KC, Seropian S, Tao R, Torka P, Winter JN, Yahalom J, Yang JC, Burns JL, Campbell M, Sundar H. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Hodgkin Lymphoma, Version 2.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:322-334. [PMID: 35390768 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon malignancy of B-cell origin. Classical HL (cHL) and nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL are the 2 main types of HL. The cure rates for HL have increased so markedly with the advent of modern treatment options that overriding treatment considerations often relate to long-term toxicity. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for HL focusing on (1) radiation therapy dose constraints in the management of patients with HL, and (2) the management of advanced-stage and relapsed or refractory cHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Weiyun Z Ai
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Weina Chen
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Leo I Gordon
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ryan C Lynch
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington
| | - Kami Maddocks
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | - Monika Metzger
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Randa Tao
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | - Jane N Winter
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | - Joanna C Yang
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; and
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dionisi F, Scartoni D, Rombi B, Vennarini S, Righetto R, Farace P, Lorentini S, Schwarz M, Di Murro L, Demofonti C, D'Angelillo RM, Petrongari MG, Sanguineti G, Amichetti M. Consolidative active scanning proton therapy for mediastinal lymphoma: selection criteria, treatment implementation and clinical feasibility. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:558-565. [PMID: 35394144 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01918-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Proton therapy (PT) represents an advanced form of radiotherapy with unique physical properties which could be of great advantage in reducing long-term radiation morbidity for cancer survivors. Here, we aim to describe the whole process leading to the clinical implementation of consolidative active scanning proton therapy treatment (PT) for mediastinal lymphoma. METHODS The process included administrative, technical and clinical issues. Authorization of PT is required in all cases as mediastinal lymphoma is currently not on the list of diseases reimbursable by the Italian National Health Service. Technically, active scanning PT treatment for mediastinal lymphoma is complex, due to the interaction between actively scanned protons and the usually irregular and large volumes to be irradiated, the nearby healthy tissues and the target motion caused by breathing. A road map to implement the technical procedures was prepared. The clinical selection of patients was of utmost importance and took into account both patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS The first mediastinal lymphoma was treated at our PT center in 2018, four years after the start of the clinical activities. The treatment technique implementation included mechanical deep inspiration breath-hold simulation computed tomography (CT), clinical target volume (CTV)-based multifield optimization planning and plan robustness analysis. The ultimate authorization rate was 93%. In 4 cases a proton-photon plan comparison was required. Between May 2018 and February, 2021, 14 patients were treated with consolidative PT. The main clinical reasons for choosing PT over photons was a bulky disease in 8 patients (57%), patient's age in 11 patients (78%) and the proximity of the lymphoma to cardiac structures in 10 patients (71%). With a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 1-33 months) all patients but one (out-of-field relapse) are without evidence of disease, all are alive and no late toxicities were observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS The clinical implementation of consolidative active scanning PT for mediastinal lymphoma required specific technical procedures and a prolonged experience with PT treatments. An accurate selection of patients for which PT could be of advantage in comparison with photons is mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Dionisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
| | - D Scartoni
- Proton Therapy unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - B Rombi
- Proton Therapy unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | | | - R Righetto
- Proton Therapy unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - P Farace
- Proton Therapy unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | | | - M Schwarz
- Proton Therapy unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - L Di Murro
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - C Demofonti
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - R M D'Angelillo
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - M G Petrongari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - G Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim H, Richman A, Smith KJ, Shaikh PM, Beriwal S, Vargo JA. Is Radiotherapy Cost-effective in the PET/CT-era for Early-Stage Favorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma with Alternative Payment Models? Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:e135-e143. [PMID: 34902637 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite multiple randomized trials, there remains variation in practice regarding the most effective treatment for early-stage favorable-risk Hodgkin's lymphoma. With increasing emphasis on alternative payment models, we investigate the cost effectiveness of chemotherapy alone versus combined modality therapy (CMT). METHODS AND MATERIALS A Markov model was formed to compared 2 cycles of ABVD to 2 cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy in 10 fractions involved-site radiotherapy (CMT). Modalities were compared using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and evaluated with a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. RESULTS Base case analysis showed that CMT is cost effective compared to ABVD alone, with an ICER of $8,028 per QALY gained, and an incremental cost of $236 gaining 0.029 QALYs. On sensitivity analyses, results were most sensitive to changes in recurrence rates, if recurrence rate differences were ≥6% CMT was cost effective. CONCLUSION CMT is a cost-effective strategy for early-stage favorable-risk Hodgkin's lymphoma based on currently available evidence. However, small variations in recurrence rate estimates dramatically impact strategy cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayeon Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Adam Richman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth J Smith
- Clinical and Translational Science and Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Parvez M Shaikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV USA
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John A Vargo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aznar M, Ntentas G, Enmark M, Flampouri S, Meidhal Petersen P, Ricardi U, Levis M. The role of motion management and position verification in lymphoma radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210618. [PMID: 34677090 PMCID: PMC8553184 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decades, the substantial technical progress in radiation oncology offered the opportunity for more accurate planning and delivery of treatment. At the same time, the evolution of systemic treatment and the advent of modern diagnostic tools allowed for more accurate staging and consequently a safe reduction of radiotherapy (RT) target volumes and RT doses in the treatment of lymphomas. As a result, incidental irradiation of organs at risk was reduced, with a consequent reduction of severe late toxicity in long-term lymphoma survivors. Nevertheless, these innovations warrant that professionals pay attention to concurrently ensure precise planning and dose delivery to the target volume and safe sparing of the organs at risk. In particular, target and organ motion should be carefully managed in order to prevent any compromise of treatment efficacy. Several aspects should be taken into account during the treatment pathway to minimise uncertainties and to apply a valuable motion management strategy, when needed. These include: reliable image registration between diagnostic and planning radiologic exams to facilitate the contouring process, image guidance to limit positioning uncertainties and to ensure the accuracy of dose delivery and management of lung motion through procedures of respiratory gating and breath control. In this review, we will cover the current clinical approaches to minimise these uncertainties in patients treated with modern RT techniques, with a particular focus on mediastinal lymphoma. In addition, since uncertainties have a different impact on the dose deposition of protons compared to conventional x-rays, the role of motion management and position verification in proton beam therapy (PBT) will be discussed in a separate section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hall MD, Terezakis SA, Lucas JT, Gallop-Evans E, Dieckmann K, Constine LS, Hodgson D, Flerlage JE, Metzger ML, Hoppe BS. Radiotherapy across pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma research group protocols: a report from the Staging, Evaluation, and Response Criteria Harmonization (SEARCH) for childhood, adolescent, and young adult Hodgkin lymphoma (CAYAHL) Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:317-334. [PMID: 34390770 PMCID: PMC8802654 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
| | | | - John T Lucas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Eve Gallop-Evans
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - David Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jamie E Flerlage
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Monika L Metzger
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Buglione M, Guerini AE, Filippi AR, Spiazzi L, Pasinetti N, Magli A, Toraci C, Borghetti P, Triggiani L, Alghisi A, Costantino G, Bertagna F, Giaj Levra N, Pegurri L, Magrini SM. A Systematic Review on Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Mediastinal Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 167:103437. [PMID: 34358649 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) and cardiovascular diseases induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy represent the main cause of excess mortality for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients, especially when the mediastinum is involved. Conformal radiotherapy techniques such as Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) could allow a reduction of the dose to the organs-at-risk (OARs) and therefore limit long-term toxicity. METHODS We performed a systematic review of the current literature regarding comparisons between IMRT and conventional photon beam radiotherapy, or between different IMRT techniques, for the treatment of mediastinal lymphoma. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS IMRT allows a substantial reduction of the volumes of OARs exposed to high doses, reducing the risk of long-term toxicity. This benefit is conterbalanced by the increase of volumes receiving low doses, that could potentially increase the risk of SMNs. Treatment planning should be personalized on patient and disease characteristics. Dedicated techniques such as "butterfly" VMAT often provide the best trade-off.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Buglione
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Andrea Emanuele Guerini
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Luigi Spiazzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; Radiation Oncology Service, ASST Valcamonica Esine, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Udine General Hospital, Udine, Italy.
| | - Cristian Toraci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Alghisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy.
| | | | - Francesco Bertagna
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Niccolò Giaj Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Italy.
| | - Ludovica Pegurri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques for Mediastinal Lymphomas: Results from an Italian Survey. HEMATO 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/hemato2030031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background: Multiple methods have been implemented to limit the impact of radiotherapy on patients affected by mediastinal lymphoma, including breathing control techniques, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), although the actual diffusion of such techniques is unclear. No surveys have been published to date evaluating the techniques adopted at different centers. Methods: A survey with a dedicated questionnaire was submitted to 195 Italian radiotherapy centers, assessing items regarding the characteristics of the center and clinical practice in the treatment of mediastinal lymphomas. Results: A total of 43 centers (22%) responded, the majority of which were university hospitals (37.2%) or cancer care centers (27.9%). In 95.4% of the centers, IMRT was used in the clinical practice, and the most frequently employed techniques were VMAT (48.8% of centers) and non-rotational IMRT (31.7%). Comparison of multiple plans was performed by 66.7% of the responding centers. Dose constraints for organs at risk were consistently prescribed. IGRT techniques were adopted by 93% of the centers, while breathing control or gating techniques were routinely used by only 25.6% of the centers. A necessity to standardize OAR constraints and define guidelines was perceived by almost all participants. Conclusions: Modern radiotherapy techniques are widely used in the Italian centers, although with heterogeneous characteristics.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wirth A, Mikhaeel NG, Aleman BM, Pinnix CC, Constine LS, Ricardi U, Illidge TM, Eich HT, Hoppe BS, Dabaja B, Ng AK, Kirova Y, Berthelsen AK, Dieckmann K, Yahalom J, Specht L. Involved Site Radiation Therapy in Adult Lymphomas: An Overview of International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group Guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:909-933. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
12
|
Hoppe RT, Advani RH, Ai WZ, Ambinder RF, Armand P, Bello CM, Benitez CM, Bierman PJ, Boughan KM, Dabaja B, Gordon LI, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Herrera AF, Hochberg EP, Huang J, Johnston PB, Kaminski MS, Kenkre VP, Khan N, Lynch RC, Maddocks K, McConathy J, McKinney M, Metzger M, Morgan D, Mulroney C, Rabinovitch R, Rosenspire KC, Seropian S, Tao R, Winter JN, Yahalom J, Burns JL, Ogba N. Hodgkin Lymphoma, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:755-781. [PMID: 32502987 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) provide recommendations for the management of adult patients with HL. The NCCN panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant data, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. Current management of classic HL involves initial treatment with chemotherapy alone or combined modality therapy followed by restaging with PET/CT to assess treatment response. Overall, the introduction of less toxic and more effective regimens has significantly advanced HL cure rates. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines focuses on the management of classic HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Weiyun Z Ai
- 2UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kirsten M Boughan
- 7Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | - Leo I Gordon
- 9Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | - Jiayi Huang
- 13Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | - Ryan C Lynch
- 18Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | - Kami Maddocks
- 19The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Monika Metzger
- 22St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Randa Tao
- 28Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | - Jane N Winter
- 9Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oishi T, Kogelschatz CJ, Young NP, Hoffmann EM, Staff NP, Visscher SL, Borah BJ, Krauss WE, Arumaithurai K, Shelly S, Ansell SM, Klein CJ. Expanded neuromuscular morbidity in Hodgkin lymphoma after radiotherapy. Brain Commun 2020; 2:fcaa050. [PMID: 32954302 PMCID: PMC7425393 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Our study aims to quantitate neuromuscular morbidity from radiotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma including: (i) frequency and (ii) time of onsets for neurological localizations; (iii) degree of disabilities and (iv) number of clinical visits compared to cardiopulmonary Hodgkin lymphoma-radiation complications. Medical records from Mayo Health systems were retrieved; identifying neuromuscular radiation treated Hodgkin lymphoma-complications from 1 January 1994 to 31 December 2016. Of an estimated 4100 post-radiotherapy Hodgkin lymphoma patients, 4.6% (189) were identified with complications. Mean latency to physician visit for symptoms was 23.7 years (range: 1-50). Most commonly identified complications included: head drop 10% (19) with or without myopathy, myopathy 39% (73), plexopathy 29% (54), myelopathy 27% (51) and polyradiculopathy 13% (24). Other findings included benign and malignant nerve sheath tumours 5% (9), phrenic and long thoracic mononeuropathies 7% (14) and compressive spinal meningioma 2% (4). Patients frequently had multiple coexisting complications (single = 76% [144], double = 17% [33], triple = 4% [8], quadruple = 2% [4]). Cardiac 28% (53) and pulmonary 15% (29) complications were also seen in these patients. History of Hodgkin lymphoma was initially overlooked by neurologists (14.3%, 48/336 clinical notes). Hospital and outpatient visits for complications were frequent: neuromuscular 19% (77/411) versus cardiopulmonary 30% (125/411). Testing was largely exclusionary, except when imaging identified secondary malignancy. Modified Rankin score at diagnosis varied: 0-1 (55.8%), 2-3 (5.8%) and 4-5 (38.3%). Neuromuscular complications among post-radiation Hodgkin lymphoma are diverse, occurring in ∼1 of 20 having markedly delayed onsets often eluding diagnosis. Frequent care visits and major morbidity are common. Survivorship recommendations should recognize the diverse neurological complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Oishi
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Cory J Kogelschatz
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.,Intermountain Neurosciences Institute, Murray, UT 84107, USA
| | - Nathan P Young
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Nathan P Staff
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Sue L Visscher
- Center of the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Bijan J Borah
- Center of the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - William E Krauss
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Shahar Shelly
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Christopher J Klein
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Filippi AR, Meregalli S, DI Russo A, Levis M, Ciammella P, Buglione M, Guerini AE, De Marco G, De Sanctis V, Vagge S, Ricardi U, Simontacchi G. Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) expert consensus on the use of intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma involving the mediastinum. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:62. [PMID: 32164700 PMCID: PMC7066773 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01504-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim Advances in therapy have resulted in improved cure rates and an increasing number of long-term Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) survivors. However, radiotherapy (RT)-related late effects are still a significant issue, particularly for younger patients with mediastinal disease (secondary cancers, heart diseases). In many Centers, technological evolution has substantially changed RT planning and delivery. This consensus document aims to analyze the current knowledge of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) for mediastinal HL and formulate practical recommendations based on scientific evidence and expert opinions. Methods A dedicated working group was set up within the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) Radiotherapy Committee in May 2018. After a first meeting, the group adopted a dedicated platform to share retrieved articles and other material. Two group coordinators redacted a first document draft, that was further discussed and finalized in two subsequent meetings. Topics of interest were: 1) Published data comparing 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and IMRT 2) dose objectives for the organs at risk 3) IGRT protocols and motion management. Results Data review showed that IMRT might allow for an essential reduction in the high-dose regions for all different thoracic OAR. As very few studies included specific dose constraints for lungs and breasts, the low-dose component for these OAR resulted slightly higher with IMRT vs. 3D-CRT, depending on the technique used. We propose a set of dose objectives for the heart, breasts, lungs, and thyroid. The use of IGRT is advised for margin reduction without specific indications, such as the use of breath-holding techniques. An individual approach, including comparative planning and considering different risk factors for late morbidity, is recommended for each patient. Conclusions As HL therapy continues to evolve, with an emphasis on treatment reduction, radiation oncologists should use at best all the available tools to minimize the dose to organs at risk and optimize treatment plans. This document provides indications on the use of IMRT/IGRT based on expert consensus, providing a basis for clinical implementation and future development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Viale Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | | | - Anna DI Russo
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Viale Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Levis M, Filippi AR, Fiandra C, De Luca V, Bartoncini S, Vella D, Ragona R, Ricardi U. Inclusion of heart substructures in the optimization process of volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques may reduce the risk of heart disease in Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. Radiother Oncol 2019; 138:52-58. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
16
|
The Optimal Use of Imaging in Radiation Therapy for Lymphoma: Guidelines from the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:501-512. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
17
|
Starke A, Bowden J, Lynn R, Hall K, Hudson K, Rato A, Aldridge E, Robb D, Steele P, Brady J, Mikhaeel NG. Comparison of butterfly volumetric modulated arc therapy to full arc with or without deep inspiration breath hold for the treatment of mediastinal lymphoma. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:449-455. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Revised: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
18
|
Boros A, Ribrag V, Deutsch É, Chargari C, Izar F. [Radiation therapy planning for Hodgkin lymphoma: Focus on intensity-modulated radiotherapy, gating, protons. Which techniques to best deliver radiation?]. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:404-410. [PMID: 30076071 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The optimization of radiotherapy in these young and long-lived survivors raises the question about the interest of using modern techniques to allow a better distribution of the dose. The choice of the irradiation technique must take into account the incidence of side effects related to radiation. In this context, the definition of the target volumes as well as the verification and monitoring of the delivered processing are essential. International recommendations for treatment fields are based on the "involved node radiotherapy" concept. The best irradiation technique to use remains to be defined. The use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves the coverage and reduces the dose to the organs at risk with a variable gain depending on the topography of the lymph nodes: upper or lower mediastinum, right or left lateralization, the techniques used. The deep inspiration breath-hold technique allows an increase of the pulmonary volume, extension of the mediastinum with an up down of the heart which make possible to move the planning target volume away from the cardiac structures. The volumetric-modulated arctherapy technique with several arches can be particularly interesting to reduce the dose to the breasts, as well as tomotherapy when bulky disease. Proton therapy with the Bragg peak specificity can play a key role in limiting doses to organs at risk, when robust planning that will take into account geometric and physical uncertainties is available. The heterogeneity of Hodgkin lymphomas in terms of volume, shape and initial location are the key elements to take into account when choosing the preferred radiotherapy technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Boros
- Département de radiothérapie, Cancer campus Grand-Paris, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Université Paris Sud, université Paris Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
| | - V Ribrag
- Département d'hématologie, Cancer campus Grand-Paris, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Département des innovations thérapeutiques et essais précoces, Cancer campus Grand-Paris, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - É Deutsch
- Département de radiothérapie, Cancer campus Grand-Paris, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Université Paris Sud, université Paris Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; U1030, Inserm, molecular radiotherapy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - C Chargari
- Département de radiothérapie, Cancer campus Grand-Paris, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Université Paris Sud, université Paris Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; D19, institut de recherche biomédicale des armées, 91220 Brétigny-sur-Orge, France; Service de santé des armées, école du Val-de-Grâce, 74, boulevard de Port-Royal, 75005 Paris, France
| | - F Izar
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Carella AM, Corradini P, Mussetti A, Ricardi U, Vitolo U, Viviani S. Treatment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the era of brentuximab vedotin and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Ann Hematol 2018; 97:1301-1315. [PMID: 29802458 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-018-3366-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The majority of Hodgkin lymphoma patients are now cured with conventional first-line therapy; however, 10-15% of early-stage disease and less than 30% of advanced-stage patients are refractory(rare) or relapsed. Salvage second-line therapy combined with high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation can cure 40-50% of patients. Recently novel agents (Brentuximab Vedotin and Immune Checkpoint inhibitors) have demonstrated evidence of therapeutic activity and are potential bridge to an allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. The review is aimed to present not only salvage strategies; indeed, the paper contains paragraphs about therapy and new treatment options at diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Carella
- Division of Hematology and BMT Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
| | - P Corradini
- Division of Hematology and BMT Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - A Mussetti
- Division of Hematology and BMT Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - U Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Università di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - U Vitolo
- AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - S Viviani
- Division of Hematology and BMT Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hoppe BS, Hill-Kayser CE, Tseng YD, Flampouri S, Elmongy HM, Cahlon O, Mendenhall NP, Maity A, McGee LA, Plastaras JP. Consolidative proton therapy after chemotherapy for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:2179-2184. [PMID: 28911093 PMCID: PMC5834068 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We investigated early outcomes for patients receiving chemotherapy followed by consolidative proton therapy (PT) for the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Patients and methods From June 2008 through August 2015, 138 patients with HL enrolled on either IRB-approved outcomes tracking protocols or registry studies received consolidative PT. Patients were excluded due to relapsed or refractory disease. Involved-site radiotherapy field designs were used for all patients. Pediatric patients received a median dose of 21 Gy(RBE) [range 15–36 Gy(RBE)]; adult patients received a median dose of 30.6 Gy(RBE) [range, 20–45 Gy(RBE)]. Patients receiving PT were young (median age, 20 years; range 6–57). Overall, 42% were pediatric (≤18 years) and 93% were under the age of 40 years. Thirty-eight percent of patients were male and 62% female. Stage distribution included 73% with I/II and 27% with III/IV disease. Patients predominantly had mediastinal involvement (96%) and bulky disease (57%), whereas 37% had B symptoms. The median follow-up was 32 months (range, 5–92 months). Results The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 92% for all patients; it was 96% for adults and 87% for pediatric patients (P = 0.18). When evaluated by positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan response at the end of chemotherapy, patients with a partial response had worse 3-year progression-free survival compared with other patients (78% versus 94%; P = 0.0034). No grade 3 radiation-related toxicities have occurred to date. Conclusion Consolidative PT following standard chemotherapy in HL is primarily used in young patients with mediastinal and bulky disease. Early relapse-free survival rates are similar to those reported with photon radiation treatment, and no early grade 3 toxicities have been observed. Continued follow-up to assess late effects is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville
| | - C E Hill-Kayser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Y D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle.,Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville.,Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle
| | - S Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
| | - H M Elmongy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - O Cahlon
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.,Procure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset
| | - N P Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville
| | - A Maity
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - L A McGee
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville.,Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, USA
| | - J P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kallam A, Armitage JO. Watch and Wait, Salvage Later. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:549-550. [PMID: 29413266 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Avyakta Kallam
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - James O Armitage
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Comparative effectiveness of image-guided radiotherapy for non-operated localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population-based propensity score matched analysis. Oncotarget 2018; 7:71548-71555. [PMID: 27689398 PMCID: PMC5342100 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) coupled with image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is associated with a theoretical benefit in non-operated localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NOL-ESCC) patients, there is currently no clinical evidence to support this. Results The study population in the primary analysis comprised 866 patients who were well balanced in terms of their co-variables. The HR for mortality when group A was compared with group B was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.7–0.95). SA revealed that the result was moderately sensitive. Materials and Methods Eligible patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2013 were identified in the Taiwan Cancer Registry. A propensity score-matched cohort was constructed [1:1 in groups A (with IGRT) and B (without IGRT)] to balance any observable potential confounders. The hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was compared between groups A and B during the follow-up period. Sensitivity analyses (SA) were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings regarding the selection of confounders and a potential unobserved confounder. Conclusions The current results provide the first clinical evidence that CCRT coupled with IGRT is associated with better overall survival when compared with CCRT without IGRT in NOL-ESCC patients. However, this study should be interpreted with caution given its non-randomized nature and the moderate sensitivity of the data. Further studies are needed to clarify this finding.
Collapse
|
23
|
Tseng YD, Cutter DJ, Plastaras JP, Parikh RR, Cahlon O, Chuong MD, Dedeckova K, Khan MK, Lin SY, McGee LA, Shen EYL, Terezakis SA, Badiyan SN, Kirova YM, Hoppe RT, Mendenhall NP, Pankuch M, Flampouri S, Ricardi U, Hoppe BS. Evidence-based Review on the Use of Proton Therapy in Lymphoma From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group (PTCOG) Lymphoma Subcommittee. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:825-842. [PMID: 28943076 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - David J Cutter
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rahul R Parikh
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael D Chuong
- Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Katerina Dedeckova
- Proton Therapy Department, Proton Therapy Center, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mohammad K Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Shinn-Yn Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Eric Yi-Liang Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Stephanie A Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shahed N Badiyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Youlia M Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Richard T Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Nancy P Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida; University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Mark Pankuch
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida; University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida; University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nanda R, Flampouri S, Mendenhall NP, Indelicato DJ, Jones LM, Seeram VK, Hoppe BS. Pulmonary Toxicity Following Proton Therapy for Thoracic Lymphoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:494-497. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
25
|
Rechner LA, Maraldo MV, Vogelius IR, Zhu XR, Dabaja BS, Brodin NP, Petersen PM, Specht L, Aznar MC. Life years lost attributable to late effects after radiotherapy for early stage Hodgkin lymphoma: The impact of proton therapy and/or deep inspiration breath hold. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:41-47. [PMID: 28838605 PMCID: PMC5844950 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2017] [Revised: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Due to the long life expectancy after treatment, the risk of late effects after radiotherapy (RT) is of particular importance for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Both deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and proton therapy have been shown to reduce the dose to normal tissues for mediastinal HL, but the impact of these techniques in combination is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the life years lost (LYL) attributable to late effects after RT for mediastinal HL using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in free breathing (FB) and DIBH, and proton therapy in FB and DIBH. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plans for each technique were created for 22 patients with HL. Doses were extracted and the risk of late effects and LYL were estimated. RESULTS We found that the use of DIBH, proton therapy, and the combination significantly reduced the LYL compared to IMRT in FB. The lowest LYL was found for proton therapy in DIBH. However, when IMRT in DIBH was compared to proton therapy in FB, no significant difference was found. CONCLUSIONS Patient-specific plan comparisons should be used to select the optimal technique when comparing IMRT in DIBH and proton therapy in FB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Ann Rechner
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Niels Bohr Insitute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | | | - Xiaorong Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Bouthaina Shbib Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Nils Patrik Brodin
- Institute for Onco-Physics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA
| | | | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marianne Camille Aznar
- Niels Bohr Insitute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
This topic addresses the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with favorable prognosis stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma. In most cases, combined modality therapy (chemotherapy followed by involved site radiation therapy) constitutes the current standard of care. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. By combining the most recent medical literature and expert opinion, this revised guideline can aid clinicians in the appropriate use of combined modality therapy for favorable prognosis stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma. Increasing information about the late effects of treatment has led to attempts to decrease toxicity by using less chemotherapy (decreased duration and/or intensity or different agents) and less radiation therapy (reduced volume and/or dose) while maintaining excellent efficacy.
Collapse
|
27
|
Filippi AR, Levis M, Parikh R, Hoppe B. Optimal Therapy for Early-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Risk Adapting, Response Adapting, and Role of Radiotherapy. Curr Oncol Rep 2017; 19:34. [PMID: 28365830 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-017-0592-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this article is to discuss the current role of radiotherapy (RT) for early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) in the context of risk-adapted and response-adapted treatment strategy, and describe changes in RT technical approach. RECENT FINDINGS In low-risk patients, RT could be omitted but, at the price of a lower progression-free survival, and its role is still debated. Ongoing trials are combining new agents with chemotherapy alone or response-adapted combined modality therapy, and results are awaited. Modern RT incorporates lower doses and smaller fields, together with the implementation of sophisticated delivery techniques aimed to reducing the dose to critical structures such as the heart. The role of RT for early-stage HL is still under debate, and new combinations are emerging; an individualized approach should be recommended, considering all RT technical opportunities to minimize toxicity while maintaining efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, University of Torino, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
| | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, University of Torino, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Rahul Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Bradford Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Aznar MC, Girinsky T, Berthelsen AK, Aleman B, Beijert M, Hutchings M, Lievens Y, Meijnders P, Meidahl Petersen P, Schut D, Maraldo MV, van der Maazen R, Specht L. Interobserver delineation uncertainty in involved-node radiation therapy (INRT) for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: on behalf of the Radiotherapy Committee of the EORTC lymphoma group. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:608-613. [PMID: 28105886 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1279750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) the target volume nowadays consists of the volume of the originally involved nodes. Delineation of this volume on a post-chemotherapy CT-scan is challenging. We report on the interobserver variability in target volume definition and its impact on resulting treatment plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two representative cases were selected (1: male, stage IB, localization: left axilla; 2: female, stage IIB, localizations: mediastinum and bilateral neck). Eight experienced observers individually defined the clinical target volume (CTV) using involved-node radiotherapy (INRT) as defined by the EORTC-GELA guidelines for the H10 trial. A consensus contour was generated and the standard deviation computed. We investigated the overlap between observer and consensus contour [Sørensen-Dice coefficient (DSC)] and the magnitude of gross deviations between the surfaces of the observer and consensus contour (Hausdorff distance). 3D-conformal (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were calculated for each contour in order to investigate the impact of interobserver variability on each treatment modality. Similar target coverage was enforced for all plans. RESULTS The median CTV was 120 cm3 (IQR: 95-173 cm3) for Case 1, and 255 cm3 (IQR: 183-293 cm3) for Case 2. DSC values were generally high (>0.7), and Hausdorff distances were about 30 mm. The SDs between all observer contours, providing an estimate of the systematic error associated with delineation uncertainty, ranged from 1.9 to 3.8 mm (median: 3.2 mm). Variations in mean dose resulting from different observer contours were small and were not higher in IMRT plans than in 3D-CRT plans. CONCLUSIONS We observed considerable differences in target volume delineation, but the systematic delineation uncertainty of around 3 mm is comparable to that reported in other tumour sites. This report is a first step towards calculating an evidence-based planning target volume margin for INRT in HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne C. Aznar
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Theodore Girinsky
- Service de Radiothérapie Oncologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anne Kiil Berthelsen
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Berthe Aleman
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max Beijert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Hutchings
- Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Paul Meijnders
- Department of Radiation Oncology GZA, Iridium Cancer Network, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Peter Meidahl Petersen
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Deborah Schut
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maja V. Maraldo
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Richard van der Maazen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wray J, Flampouri S, Slayton W, Joyce M, Sandler E, Morris CG, Li Z, Indelicato DJ, Mendenhall NP, Hoppe BS. Proton Therapy for Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2016; 63:1522-6. [PMID: 27149120 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2015] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to X-ray radiation therapy, proton therapy (PT) reduces the radiation dose to organs at risk, which is expected to translate into fewer second cancers and less cardiac morbidity decades after treatment. The Children's Oncology Group high-risk pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (PHL) protocol, AHOD1331, allows the use of PT, yet limited data exist on the use of PT in PHL. PROCEDURE Between 2010 and 2014, 22 pediatric patients were treated with PT for PHL at our institution: 7 intermediate-risk patients, 11 high-risk patients, and 4 relapsed patients. The patients' age ranged from 6 to 18 years old. Median follow-up was 36 months. All patients received chemotherapy before PT. RESULTS The 2-year and 3-year overall survival rates were both 94%, and the progression-free survival rate was 86%. Recurrences occurred in three high-risk patients: one isolated in-field cervical lymph node and two in-field and out-of-field. All recurrences occurred within 5 months of completing PT. No PT-related grade 3 or higher acute or late complications were observed. CONCLUSION PT for PHL showed no short-term severe toxicity and yields similar short-term control to recently published large multi-institutional clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Wray
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - William Slayton
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Department of Pediatrics, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Michael Joyce
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours Children's Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Eric Sandler
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours Children's Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Zuofeng Li
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Nancy P Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tiong A, Lao L, MacKean J, Goonetilleke M, Kron T. Faculty of Radiation Oncology Position Paper on the use of Image-Guided Radiation Therapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2016; 60:772-780. [PMID: 27122102 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 03/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The development of technology such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) has resulted in highly conformal radiotherapy treatments. While such technology has allowed for improved dose delivery, it has also meant that improved accuracy in the treatment room is required. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), the use of imaging prior to or during treatment delivery, has been shown to improve the accuracy of treatment delivery and in some circumstances, clinical outcomes. Allied with the adoption of highly conformal treatments, there is a need for stringent quality assurance processes in a multidisciplinary environment. In 2015, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologist (RANZCR) updated its position paper on IGRT. The draft document was distributed through the membership of the Faculty of Radiation Oncology (FRO) for review and the final version was endorsed by the board of FRO. This article describes issues that radiotherapy departments throughout Australia and New Zealand should consider. It outlines the role of IGRT and reviews current clinical evidence supporting the benefit of IGRT in genitourinary, head and neck, and lung cancers. It also highlights important international publications which provide guidance on implementation and quality assurances for IGRT. A set of key recommendations are provided to guide safe and effective IGRT implementation and practice in the Australian and New Zealander context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Tiong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louis Lao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.,Auckland Radiation Oncology, Auckland, New Zealand.,University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - James MacKean
- Genesis Cancer Care Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Madhavi Goonetilleke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Townsville Cancer Centre, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tomas Kron
- Department of Medical Physics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Besson N, Pernin V, Zefkili S, Kirova YM. Evolution of radiation techniques in the treatment of mediastinal lymphoma: from 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) to intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT): a single-centre experience and review of the literature. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20150409. [PMID: 26744079 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate radiation techniques and their toxicity in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with mediastinal disease over a 10-year period. METHODS Between 2003 and 2015, 173 patients with Stage I-III nodal lymphoma were treated in our institution: some of these patients were irradiated for HL or NHL with mediastinal disease. Some of the patients were treated by three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), others by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). RESULTS We studied 26 males and 43 females with a median age of 26 years. The median follow-up was 43 months. 49 patients were treated by 3DCRT and 20 patients by IMRT. The median dose received by patients treated for NHL was 40 Gy (range: 36-44 Gy), and the median dose received by patients with HL was 30 Gy (range: 30-36 Gy). Between 2003 and 2006, 16 patients were treated by 3DCRT vs 0 patients by IMRT. Between 2007 and 2009, 16 patients received 3DCRT and one patient received IMRT. Between 2010 and 2015, 19 patients received IMRT, and no patients received 3DCRT. 11 of the 20 (55%) patients treated by IMRT and 35 of the 49 (71.4%) patients treated by 3DCRT experienced acute toxicity. Among the patients treated by 3DCRT, one patient experienced Grade 1 radiation pneumonitis and two patients experienced Grade 1 acute mucositis. No late toxicity was observed in patients treated by IMRT. CONCLUSION Improvement of radiation techniques for HL and NHL appears to have improved acute and late clinical safety. Longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate very late toxicity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Improvement of radiation techniques for HL and NHL appears to improve the tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Besson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Victor Pernin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Sofia Zefkili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Youlia M Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Portlock CS. Involved site radiation therapy for the treatment of early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in adolescents and young adults. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY IN ADOLESCENTS AND YOUNG ADULTS 2015; 5:97-102. [PMID: 26767184 PMCID: PMC4708267 DOI: 10.2147/coaya.s70370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy technology has permitted the development of new treatment planning techniques. Involved field, involved node, and involved site radiotherapy fields are discussed and compared. Indications for and implications of combined modality therapy are examined, particularly as pertinent to the adolescent and young adult population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol S Portlock
- Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jackson MW, Rusthoven CG, Jones BL, Kamdar M, Rabinovitch R. Improved Survival With Radiation Therapy in Stage I-II Primary Mediastinal B Cell Lymphoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 94:126-132. [PMID: 26547384 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2015] [Revised: 08/31/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is an uncommon lymphoma for which trials are few with small patient numbers. The role of radiation therapy (RT) after standard immunochemotherapy for early-stage disease has never been studied prospectively. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate PMBCL and the impact of RT on outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS We queried the SEER database for patients with stage I-II PMBCL diagnosed from 2001 to 2011. Retrievable data included age, gender, race (white/nonwhite), stage, extranodal disease, year of diagnosis, and use of RT as a component of definitive therapy. Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) estimates, univariate (UVA) log-rank and multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Two hundred fifty patients with stage I-II disease were identified, with a median follow-up time of 39 months (range, 3-125 months). The median age was 36 years (range, 18-89 years); 61% were female; 76% were white; 45% had stage I disease, 60% had extranodal disease, and 55% were given RT. The 5-year OS for the entire cohort was 86%. On UVA, OS was improved with RT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.446, P=.029) and decreased in association with nonwhite race (HR 2.70, P=.006). The 5-year OS was 79% (no RT) and 90% (RT). On MVA, white race and RT remained significantly associated with improved OS (P=.007 and .018, respectively). The use of RT decreased over time: 61% for the 67 patients whose disease was diagnosed from 2001 to 2005 and 53% in the 138 patients treated from 2006 to 2010. CONCLUSION This retrospective population-based analysis is the largest PMBCL dataset to date and demonstrates a significant survival benefit associated with RT. Nearly half of patients treated in the United States do not receive RT, and its use appears to be declining. In the absence of phase 3 data, the use of RT should be strongly considered for its survival benefit in early-stage disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W Jackson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado.
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Bernard L Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Manali Kamdar
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Rachel Rabinovitch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Eng T, Ha CS. Image-guided radiation therapy in lymphoma management. Radiat Oncol J 2015; 33:161-71. [PMID: 26484299 PMCID: PMC4607569 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2015.33.3.161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Revised: 09/14/2015] [Accepted: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is a process of incorporating imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Positron emission tomography (PET), and ultrasound (US) during radiation therapy (RT) to improve treatment accuracy. It allows real-time or near real-time visualization of anatomical information to ensure that the target is in its position as planned. In addition, changes in tumor volume and location due to organ motion during treatment can be also compensated. IGRT has been gaining popularity and acceptance rapidly in RT over the past 10 years, and many published data have been reported on prostate, bladder, head and neck, and gastrointestinal cancers. However, the role of IGRT in lymphoma management is not well defined as there are only very limited published data currently available. The scope of this paper is to review the current use of IGRT in the management of lymphoma. The technical and clinical aspects of IGRT, lymphoma imaging studies, the current role of IGRT in lymphoma management and future directions will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Eng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Chul S. Ha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
FDG-PET and radiotherapy in lymphoma. Clin Transl Imaging 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-015-0129-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
36
|
Filippi AR, Ragona R, Piva C, Scafa D, Fiandra C, Fusella M, Giglioli FR, Lohr F, Ricardi U. Optimized volumetric modulated arc therapy versus 3D-CRT for early stage mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma without axillary involvement: a comparison of second cancers and heart disease risk. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92:161-8. [PMID: 25863763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2014] [Revised: 02/08/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risks of second cancers and cardiovascular diseases associated with an optimized volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning solution in a selected cohort of stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated with either involved-node or involved-site radiation therapy in comparison with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-eight patients (13 males and 25 females) were included. Disease extent was mediastinum alone (n=8, 21.1%); mediastinum plus unilateral neck (n=19, 50%); mediastinum plus bilateral neck (n=11, 29.9%). Prescription dose was 30 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. Only 5 patients had mediastinal bulky disease at diagnosis (13.1%). Anteroposterior 3D-CRT was compared with a multiarc optimized VMAT solution. Lung, breast, and thyroid cancer risks were estimated by calculating a lifetime attributable risk (LAR), with a LAR ratio (LAR(VMAT)-to-LAR(3D-CRT)) as a comparative measure. Cardiac toxicity risks were estimated by calculating absolute excess risk (AER). RESULTS The LAR ratio favored 3D-CRT for lung cancer induction risk in mediastinal alone (P=.004) and mediastinal plus unilateral neck (P=.02) presentations. LAR ratio for breast cancer was lower for VMAT in mediastinal plus bilateral neck presentations (P=.02), without differences for other sites. For thyroid cancer, no significant differences were observed, regardless of anatomical presentation. A significantly lower AER of cardiac (P=.038) and valvular diseases (P<.0001) was observed for VMAT regardless of disease extent. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of patients with favorable characteristics in terms of disease extent at diagnosis (large prevalence of nonbulky presentations without axillary involvement), optimized VMAT reduced heart disease risk with comparable risks of thyroid and breast cancer, with an increase in lung cancer induction probability. The results are however strongly influenced by the different anatomical presentations, supporting an individualized approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Riccardo Ragona
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Cristina Piva
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Christian Fiandra
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Marco Fusella
- Medical Physics, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Frank Lohr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Maraldo MV, Specht L. A Decade of Comparative Dose Planning Studies for Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: What Can We Learn? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90:1126-35. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2014] [Revised: 06/13/2014] [Accepted: 06/26/2014] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
38
|
The Evolving Role of Radiotherapy in Early Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2014; 6:e2014035. [PMID: 24959332 PMCID: PMC4063609 DOI: 10.4084/mjhid.2014.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2014] [Accepted: 04/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy has a key role in the combined modality treatment of early-stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL). Nevertheless, late toxicity still remains an issue. A modern approach in HL radiotherapy includes lower doses and smaller fields, together with the implementation of sophisticated and dedicated delivery techniques. Aim of the present review is to discuss the current role of radiotherapy and its potential future developments, with a focus on major clinical trials, technological advances and their repercussion in the clinical management of HL patients.
Collapse
|