1
|
Janoray G, Bruguière E, Mazurier J, Dudouet P, Guillotreau J, Tollon C, Labarthe P, Seguin P, Latorzeff I. Long-term evaluation of the safety of a rectal-prostate spacer, the ProSpace® balloon, in patients treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:934. [PMID: 39090577 PMCID: PMC11292989 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12692-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the close proximity of the prostate and rectum, rectal toxicity remains a major problem in patient treated by radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma. One method of increasing the distance between the prostate and the rectum is to use a spacer implanted into the rectoprostatic space. This report describes the long-term outcomes obtained with a new ballon spacer. METHODS Patients treated with curative radiotherapy for low- or intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma, who underwent insertion of the ProSpace® (BioProtect Ltd, Tzur Yigal, Israel) rectal-prostate balloon spacer, were included. The main objective was to evaluate the dosimetric benefit of the spacer for OARs. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of ProSpace® balloon placement and to evaluate its long-term therapeutic efficacy and tolerance. RESULTS Between October 2013 and March 2015, 16 patients were enrolled in the Pasteur Clinic, Toulouse, France. The median follow-up was 85.5 months. From top to bottom, the space created was a mean of 16.3 mm (range: 11-20.5 mm) at the base of the prostate, 12.1 mm (range: 4-16 mm) at the middle and 8.9 mm at the apex (range: 5-15 mm). On average, rectal volumes receiving a dose of 70 Gy, 60 Gy and 50 Gy were significantly lower after balloon implantation: -4.81 cc (1.5 vs. 6.3; p < 0.0005), -8.08 cc (6.4 vs. 14.5; p = 0.002) and -9.06 cc (16.7 vs. 25.7; p = 0.003), respectively. There were significant differences in coverage after balloon implantation: Median V95% (p < 0.0005), median Dmin (p = 0.01) and median V98% (p < 0.001) were higher after balloon implantation. At 5 years, cumulative gastrointestinal toxicity was grade 1 in 6% (1/16 patients). No toxicity of grade 2 or higher was found. At 5 years, no urinary toxicity grade 3 or 4 toxicity was found. The QoL was not deteriorated. CONCLUSIONS The use of the ProSpace® balloon seems to be well accepted by patients, allowing a double dosimetric gain: a decrease in doses received by the rectum and an improvement in the coverage of the high-risk PTV. The long-term gastrointestinal toxicity remains low and QoL is preserved in all treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Janoray
- Oncologie Radiothérapie, Groupe Orion, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France.
| | - E Bruguière
- Service d'Imagerie Médicale, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France
| | - J Mazurier
- Oncologie Radiothérapie, Groupe Orion, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France
| | - P Dudouet
- Oncologie Radiothérapie, Groupe Orion, Clinique du Pont de Chaume, 82000, Montauban, France
| | - J Guillotreau
- Service d'Urologie, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France
| | - C Tollon
- Service d'Urologie, Clinique Croix du Sud, 31130, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - P Labarthe
- Service d'Urologie, Clinique Des Cèdres, 31700, Cornebarrieu, France
| | - P Seguin
- Service d'Urologie, Clinique d'Occitanie, 31600, Muret, France
| | - I Latorzeff
- Oncologie Radiothérapie, Groupe Orion, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patel KR, Rydzewski NR, Schott E, Cooley-Zgela T, Ning H, Cheng J, Salerno K, Huang EP, Lindenberg L, Mena E, Choyke P, Turkbey B, Citrin DE. A Phase 1 Trial of Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer After Brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:1471-1480. [PMID: 38428681 PMCID: PMC11262986 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE NCT03253744 is a phase 1 trial with the primary objective to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of salvage stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with local prostate cancer recurrence after brachytherapy. Additional objectives included biochemical control and imaging response. METHODS AND MATERIALS This trial was initially designed to test 3 therapeutic dose levels (DLs): 40 Gy (DL1), 42.5 Gy (DL2), and 45 Gy (DL3) in 5 fractions. Intensity modulation was used to deliver the prescription dose to the magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen-based positron emission tomography imaging-defined gross tumor volume while simultaneously delivering 30 Gy to an elective volume defined by the prostate gland. This phase 1 trial followed a 3+3 design with a 3-patient expansion at the MTD. Toxicities were scored until trial completion at 2 years post-SBRT using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Escalation was halted if 2 dose limiting toxicities occurred, defined as any persistent (>4 days) grade 3 toxicity occurring within the first 3 weeks after SBRT or any grade ≥3 genitourinary (GU) or grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity thereafter. RESULTS Between August 2018 and January 2023, 9 patients underwent salvage SBRT and were observed for a median of 22 months (Q1-Q3, 20-43 months). No grade 3 to 5 adverse events related to study treatment were observed; thus, no dose limiting toxicities occurred during the observation period. Escalation was halted by amendment given excellent biochemical control in DL1 and DL2 in the setting of a high incidence of clinically significant late grade 2 GU toxicity. Therefore, the MTD was considered 42.5 Gy in 5 fractions (DL2). One- and 2-year biochemical progression-free survival were 100% and 86%, representing a single patient in the trial cohort with biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] nadir + 2.0) at 20 months posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS The MTD of salvage SBRT for the treatment of intraprostatic radiorecurrence after brachytherapy was 42.5 Gy in 5 fractions producing an 86% 2-year biochemical progression-free survival rate, with 1 poststudy failure at 20 months. The most frequent clinically significant toxicity was late grade 2 GU toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishnan R Patel
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Nicholas R Rydzewski
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Erica Schott
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Theresa Cooley-Zgela
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Holly Ning
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jason Cheng
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Kilian Salerno
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Erich P Huang
- Biometric Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Liza Lindenberg
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Esther Mena
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Peter Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patel KR, van der Heide UA, Kerkmeijer LGW, Schoots IG, Turkbey B, Citrin DE, Hall WA. Target Volume Optimization for Localized Prostate Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00148-6. [PMID: 39019208 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide a comprehensive review of the means by which to optimize target volume definition for the purposes of treatment planning for patients with intact prostate cancer with a specific emphasis on focal boost volume definition. METHODS Here we conduct a narrative review of the available literature summarizing the current state of knowledge on optimizing target volume definition for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. RESULTS Historically, the treatment of prostate cancer included a uniform prescription dose administered to the entire prostate with or without coverage of all or part of the seminal vesicles. The development of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) using prostate-specific radiotracers has ushered in an era in which radiation oncologists are able to localize and focally dose-escalate high-risk volumes in the prostate gland. Recent phase 3 data has demonstrated that incorporating focal dose escalation to high-risk subvolumes of the prostate improves biochemical control without significantly increasing toxicity. Still, several fundamental questions remain regarding the optimal target volume definition and prescription strategy to implement this technique. Given the remaining uncertainty, a knowledge of the pathological correlates of radiographic findings and the anatomic patterns of tumor spread may help inform clinical judgement for the definition of clinical target volumes. CONCLUSION Advanced imaging has the ability to improve outcomes for patients with prostate cancer in multiple ways, including by enabling focal dose escalation to high-risk subvolumes. However, many questions remain regarding the optimal target volume definition and prescription strategy to implement this practice, and key knowledge gaps remain. A detailed understanding of the pathological correlates of radiographic findings and the patterns of local tumor spread may help inform clinical judgement for target volume definition given the current state of uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishnan R Patel
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - William A Hall
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cloître M, Benkhaled S, Boughdad S, Schaefer N, Prior JO, Zeverino M, Berthold D, Tawadros T, Meuwly JY, Martel P, Rohner C, Heym L, Duclos F, Vallet V, Valerio M, Bourhis J, Herrera F. Spatial Distribution of Recurrence and Long-Term Toxicity Following Dose Escalation to the Dominant Intra-Prostatic Nodule for Intermediate-High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Phase I/II Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2097. [PMID: 38893216 PMCID: PMC11171188 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives: We investigated spatial patterns between primary and recurrent tumor sites and assessed long-term toxicity after dose escalation stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the dominant intra-prostatic nodule (DIN). Materials and methods: In 33 patients with intermediate-high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), doses up to 50 Gy were administered to the DIN. Recurrence sites were determined and compared to the original tumor development sites through multiparametric MRI and 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT) images. Overlap rates, categorized as 75% or higher for full overlap, and 25-74% for partial overlap, were assessed. Long-term toxicity is reported. Results: All patients completed treatment, with only one receiving concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Recurrences were diagnosed after a median of 33 months (range: 17-76 months), affecting 13 out of 33 patients (39.4%). Intra-prostatic recurrences occurred in 7 patients (21%), with ≥75% overlap in two, a partial overlap in another two, and no overlap in the remaining three patients. Notably, five patients with intra-prostatic recurrences had synchronous bone and/or lymph node metastases, while six patients had isolated bone or lymph node metastasis without intra-prostatic recurrences. Extended follow-up revealed late grade ≥ 2 GU and GI toxicity in 18% (n = 6) and 6% (n = 2) of the patients. Conclusions: Among patients with intermediate-high-risk PCa undergoing focal dose-escalated SBRT without ADT, DIN recurrences were infrequent. When present, these recurrences were typically located at the original site or adjacent to the initial tumor. Conversely, relapses beyond the DIN and in extra-prostatic (metastatic) sites were prevalent, underscoring the significance of systemic ADT in managing this patient population. Advances in knowledge: Focal dose-escalated prostate SBRT prevented recurrences in the dominant nodule; however, extra-prostatic recurrence sites were frequent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minna Cloître
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Sofian Benkhaled
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Sarah Boughdad
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (S.B.); (N.S.); (J.O.P.)
| | - Niklaus Schaefer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (S.B.); (N.S.); (J.O.P.)
| | - John O. Prior
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (S.B.); (N.S.); (J.O.P.)
| | - Michele Zeverino
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Dominik Berthold
- Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Thomas Tawadros
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (T.T.); (P.M.); (C.R.); (M.V.)
| | - Jean-Yves Meuwly
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radiology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Paul Martel
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (T.T.); (P.M.); (C.R.); (M.V.)
| | - Chantal Rohner
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (T.T.); (P.M.); (C.R.); (M.V.)
| | - Leonie Heym
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Frederic Duclos
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Véronique Vallet
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (T.T.); (P.M.); (C.R.); (M.V.)
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
| | - Fernanda Herrera
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; (M.C.); (S.B.); (M.Z.); (L.H.); (F.D.); (V.V.); (J.B.)
- Ludwig Cancer Research Center Lausanne, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fredman E, Icht O, Moore A, Bragilovski D, Kindler J, Golan S, Limon D. SABR-Dual: a phase II/III trial of two-fraction versus five-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy for localized low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:431. [PMID: 38589860 PMCID: PMC11000374 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12165-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dose-escalated radiotherapy is known to improve progression free survival in patients with localized prostate cancer, and recent advances have led to the standardization of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) delivered in just 5-fractions. Based on the known effectiveness of the accepted though invasive 2-fraction treatment method of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and given the ubiquity of prostate cancer, a further reduction in the number of treatments of external-beam SABR is possible. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and non-inferiority of generalizable 2-fraction SABR compared to the current 5-fraction regimen. METHODS 502 patients will be enrolled on this phase II/III randomized control trial. Eligible patients will have previously untreated low- or favorable intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Patients will be randomized between standard SABR of 40 Gy in 5 fractions given every-other-day and 27 Gy in 2 fractions at least two days apart but completing within seven days. MRI-based planning, radiopaque hydrogel spacer insertion, and fiducial marker placement are required, and SABR will be delivered on either a standard CT-guided linear accelerator or MR-LINAC. The primary endpoint will be freedom from disease progression, with additional secondary clinical, toxicity, and quality of life endpoints. DISCUSSION This study will be the largest prospective randomized trial, adequately powered to demonstrate non-inferiority, comparing 2-fraction SABR to standard 5-fraction SABR for localized prostate cancer. As the protocol does not obligate use of an MRI-LINAC or other adaptive technologies, results will be broadly generalizable to the wider community. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06027892.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisha Fredman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel.
| | - Oded Icht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Assaf Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dimitri Bragilovski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Jonathan Kindler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Shay Golan
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dror Limon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Ze'ev Jabotinsky St, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
D'Agostino GR, Badalamenti M, Stefanini S, Baldaccini D, Franzese C, Faro LL, Di Cristina L, Vernier V, Reggiori G, Scorsetti M. Long term update on toxicity and survival of a phase II trial of linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. Prostate 2024; 84:368-375. [PMID: 38112222 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2016 we published a phase II study exploring safety and efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) delivered with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Flattening Filter Free (FFF) beams techniques in prostate cancer (PC) patients. We present herein the updated results on late toxicity and long-term survival. METHODS Patients enrolled in the study had a biopsy-confirmed localized PC and the features of a low- or intermediate-risk disease (National Comprehensive Network Criteria). The radiotherapy (RT) schedule consisted of 35 Gy delivered in five fractions every other day. Toxicities were registered according to the common toxicity adverse events v4.0. Biochemical recurrence was defined as an increase of prostate specific antigen after nadir, confirmed at least once. Local recurrence (LR) and distant metastases were detected either with Choline- or PSMA-PET/CT scans. Kaplan-Meier curves for Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival (BFS), Local Control (LC), Distant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS) and Cancer Specific Survival, were calculated by using MedCalc. RESULTS Ninety patients were submitted to SBRT between February 2012 and March 2015. Fifty-eight patients (64.5%) had a Gleason Score of 6, while 32 (35.5%) had a Gleason Score of 7. A late grade 1 Genito-Urinary toxicity was observed in 54.5% of patients while a grade 2 in 3.3%. A late Gastro-intestinal grade 1 toxicity was reported in 18.9% of patients, while a grade 2 in 2.2%. Erectile dysfunction was reported by 13% of patients No heavier toxicities were observed. At a median follow-up of 102 months, 5- and 8-year BFS were 93.0% and 84.4% respectively, 5- and 8-year LC were 95.2% and 87.0% respectively, 5- and 8-year DMFS were 95.3% and 88.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This long-term update confirms that SBRT is a valid therapeutic strategy for low-intermediate risk PC. RT with VMAT and FFF warrants optimal results in terms of toxicity and disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe R D'Agostino
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Badalamenti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Stefanini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Baldaccini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Lo Faro
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciana Di Cristina
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Veronica Vernier
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Deodato F, Ferro M, Bonome P, Pezzulla D, Romano C, Buwenge M, Cilla S, Morganti AG, Macchia G. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SIB-VMAT technique) to dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) for localized prostate cancer: a dose-escalation trial (DESTROY-4). Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:239-249. [PMID: 38180492 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02189-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE DESTROY-4 (DOSE-ESCALATION STUDY OF STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY) was a Phase I trial aimed to evaluate the safety and the feasibility of escalating doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on MRI-defined Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion (DIL) in low- and intermediate-risk pCa patients using a simultaneous integrated boost-volumetric arc therapy (SIB-VMAT) technique. METHODS Eligible patients included those with low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma (NCCN risk classes) and an International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) ≤ 15. No restriction about DIL and prostate volumes was set. Pretreatment preparation required an enema and the placement of intraprostatic gold fiducials. SBRT was delivered in five consecutive daily fractions. For the first three patients, the DIL radiation dose was set at 8 Gy per fraction up to a total dose of 40 Gy (PTV1) and was gradually increased in succeeding cohorts to total doses of 42.5 Gy, 45.0 Gy, 47.5 Gy, and finally, 50.0 Gy, while keeping the prescription of 35 Gy/7 Gy per fraction for the entire prostate gland. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or worse gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurring within 90 days of follow-up (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events scale 4.0). Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires at defined intervals. RESULTS Twenty-four patients with a median age of 75 (range, 58-89) years were enrolled. The median follow-up was 26.3 months (8.9-84 months). 66.7% of patients were classified as intermediate-risk groups, while the others were low-risk groups, according to the NCCN guidelines. Enrolled patients were treated as follows: 8 patients (40 Gy), 5 patients (42.5 Gy), 4 patients (45 Gy), 4 patients (47.5 Gy), and 3 patients (50 Gy). No severe acute toxicities were observed. G1 and G2 acute GU toxicities occurred in 4 (16%) and 3 patients (12.5%), respectively. Two patients (8.3%) and 3 patients (12.5%) experienced G1 and G2 GI toxicities, respectively. Since no DLTs were observed, 50 Gy in five fractions was considered the MTD. The median nadir PSA was 0.20 ng/mL. A slight improvement in QoL values was registered after the treatment. CONCLUSION This trial confirms the feasibility and safety of a total SIB-VMAT dose of 35 Gy on the whole gland and 50 Gy on DIL in 5 fractions daily administered in a well-selected low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma population. A phase II study is ongoing to confirm the tolerability of the schedule and assess the efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Milena Ferro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Paolo Bonome
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Donato Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Carmela Romano
- Medical Physics Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giacometti V, McLaughlin O, Comiskey P, Marshall H, Houlihan OA, Whitten G, Prise KM, Hounsell AR, Jain S, McGarry CK. Validation of a Quality Metric Score to Assess the Placement of Hydrogel Rectal Spacer in Patients Treated With Prostate Stereotactic Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101396. [PMID: 38304109 PMCID: PMC10831189 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the quality of the interspace between the prostate and rectum and assess the effect on the dose to the rectum by measuring the spacer quality score (SQS) before and after implanting a hydrogel rectal spacer. Methods and Materials Thirty patients with prostate cancer were treated with stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy as part of the SPORT clinical trial. Each patient had a 10 mL polyethylene glycol hydrogel spacer inserted transperineally. Computed tomography scans were acquired before and after spacer insertion, 10MV flattening filter free (FFF) stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) treatment plans were generated using each image set. To calculate the SQS, the prostate-rectal interspace (PRI) was measured in the anterior-posterior orientation, parallel to the anatomic midline at the prostate base, apex, and midgland on the prespacer and postspacer computed tomography. Measurements were taken in 3 transverse positions between the prostate and the rectum, and PRI scores of 0, 1, and 2 were assigned if the interspace between prostate and rectum was <0.3, 0.3 to 0.9, or ≥1 cm, respectively. The overall SQS was the lowest of the PRI scores. Differences between prespacer and postspacer PRIs and SQS were investigated by performing Fisher's exact test and differences between doses to the rectum were investigated by performing the paired samples Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Student t test. Results Statistically significant differences between prespacer versus postspacer patients were found when grouping patients according to their overall SQS. The PRI summary score did not reach statistical significance between prespacer and postspacer at the base but was significantly higher for the prostate midline and apex. Statistically significant differences in some rectum dose-volume metrics were found when grouping patients according to their PRIs and SQS. Conclusions SQS before and after the spacer insertion was evaluated and was found to be correlated with pre- and postspacer rectal dosimetry. Sources of improvement of the SQS scoring metric and limitations are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Giacometti
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Owen McLaughlin
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick Comiskey
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Marshall
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Orla A. Houlihan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Glenn Whitten
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin M. Prise
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Alan R. Hounsell
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Suneil Jain
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Conor K. McGarry
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ong WL, Cheung P, Chung H, Chu W, Detsky J, Liu S, Morton G, Szumacher E, Tseng CL, Vesprini D, Davidson M, Ravi A, McGuffin M, Zhang L, Mamedov A, Deabreu A, Kulasingham-Poon M, Loblaw A. To Boost or Not to Boost: Pooled Analyses From 2-Fraction SABR Trials for Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1153-1162. [PMID: 37419394 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Focal boost to dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) is an approach for dose escalation in prostate radiation therapy. In this study, we aimed to report the outcomes of 2-fraction SABR ± DIL boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS We included 60 patients with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer enrolled in 2 phase 2 trials (30 patients in each trial). In the 2STAR trial (NCT02031328), 26 Gy (equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions = 105.4 Gy) was delivered to the prostate. In the 2SMART trial (NCT03588819), 26 Gy was delivered to the prostate, with up to 32 Gy boost to magnetic resonance imaging-defined DIL (equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions = 156.4 Gy). The reported outcomes included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (ie, <0.4 ng/mL) at 4 years (4yrPSARR), biochemical failure (BF), acute and late toxicities, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS In 2SMART, median DIL D99% of 32.3 Gy was delivered. Median follow-up was 72.7 months (range, 69.1-75.) in 2STAR and 43.6 months (range, 38.7-49.5) in 2SMART. The 4yrPSARR was 57% (17/30) in 2STAR and 63% (15/24) in 2SMART (P = 0.7). The 4-year cumulative BF was 0% in 2STAR and 8.3% in 2SMART (P = 0.1). The 6-year BF in 2STAR was 3.5%. For genitourinary toxicities, there were differences in grade ≥1 urinary urgency in the acute (0% vs 47%; P < .001) and late settings (10% vs 67%; P < .001) favoring 2STAR. For urinary QOL, no difference was observed in the acute setting, but lower proportion in 2STAR had minimal clinically important changes in urinary QOL score in the late setting (21% vs 50%; P = .03). There were no significant differences in gastrointestinal and sexual toxicities and QOL in both acute and late settings between the 2 trials. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the first prospective data comparing 2-fraction prostate SABR ± DIL boost. The addition of DIL boost resulted in similar medium-term efficacy (in 4yrPSARR and BF), with impact on late urinary QOL outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hans Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stanley Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; MOLLI Surgical, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Merrylee McGuffin
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mamedov
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Morris BA, Holmes EE, Anger NJ, Cooley G, Schuster JM, Hurst N, Baschnagel AM, Bassetti MF, Blitzer GC, Chappell RJ, Bayliss RA, Morris ZS, Ritter MA, Floberg JM. Toxicity and Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Focal Boost to Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Identified Prostate Cancer Lesions: Results of a Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:613-623. [PMID: 37179035 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this prospective phase 2 trial, we investigated the toxicity and patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes in patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the prostate gland and a simultaneous focal boost to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-identified intraprostatic lesions while also de-escalating dose to the adjacent organs at risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients included low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer (Gleason score ≤7, prostate specific antigen ≤20, T stage ≤2b). SBRT was prescribed to 40 Gy in 5 fractions delivered every other day to the prostate, with any areas of high disease burden (MRI-identified prostate imaging reporting and data system 4 or 5 lesions) simultaneously escalated to 42.5 to 45 Gy and areas overlapping organs at risk (within 2 mm of urethra, rectum, and bladder) constrained to 36.25 Gy (n = 100). Patients without a pretreatment MRI or without MRI-identified lesions were treated to dose of 37.5 Gy with no focal boost (n = 14). RESULTS From 2015 to 2022, a total of 114 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 42 months. No acute or late grade 3+ gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was observed. One patient developed late grade 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicity at 16 months. In patients treated with focal boost (n = 100), acute grade 2 GU and GI toxicity was seen in 38% and 4% of patients, respectively. Cumulative late grade 2+ GU and GI toxicities at 24 months were 13% and 5% respectively. Patient-reported outcomes showed no significant long-term change from baseline in urinary, bowel, hormonal, or sexual quality-of-life scores after treatment. CONCLUSIONS SBRT to a dose of 40 Gy to the prostate gland with a simultaneous focal boost up to 45 Gy is well tolerated with similar rates of acute and late grade 2+ GI and GU toxicity as seen in other SBRT regimens without intraprostatic boost. Moreover, no significant long-term changes were seen in patient-reported urinary, bowel, or sexual outcomes from pretreatment baseline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma E Holmes
- Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Richard J Chappell
- Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Maas JA, Dobelbower MC, Yang ES, Clark GM, Jacob R, Kim RY, Cardan RA, Popple R, Nix JW, Rais-Bahrami S, Fiveash JB, McDonald AM. Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With a Focal Simultaneous Integrated Boost: 5-Year Toxicity and Biochemical Recurrence Results From a Prospective Trial. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:466-474. [PMID: 37268193 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used as a definitive treatment option for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to assess the late toxicity, patient-reported quality of life outcomes, and biochemical recurrence rates after prostate SBRT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) targeting lesions defined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients were eligible if they had biopsy-proven low- or intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma, one or more focal lesions on MRI, and an MRI-defined total prostate volume of <120 mL. All patients received SBRT delivered to the entire prostate to a dose of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions with an SIB to the lesions seen on MRI to 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Late toxicity was defined as any possible treatment-related adverse event occurring after 3 months from the completion of SBRT. Patient-reported quality of life was ascertained using standardized patient surveys. RESULTS A total of 26 patients were enrolled. Six patients (23.1%) had low-risk disease and 20 patients had intermediate-risk disease (76.9%). Seven patients (26.9%) received androgen deprivation therapy. Median follow-up was 59.5 months. No biochemical failures were observed. Three patients (11.5%) experienced late grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity requiring cystoscopy, and 7 patients (26.9%) had late grade 2 GU toxicity requiring oral medications. Three patients (11.5%) had late grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity characterized by hematochezia requiring colonoscopy and steroids per rectum. There were no grade 3 or higher toxicity events observed. The patient-reported quality-of-life metrics at the time of last follow-up were not significantly different than the pre-treatment baseline. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study support that SBRT to the entire prostate to a dose of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions with focal SIB to 40 Gy in 5 fractions has excellent biochemical control and is not associated with undue late gastrointestinal or GU toxicity or long-term quality of life decrement. Focal dose escalation with an SIB planning approach may be an opportunity to improve biochemical control while limiting dose to nearby organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared A Maas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| | - Michael C Dobelbower
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Eddy S Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Grant M Clark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, East Tennessee Radiation Oncology Group, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | - Rojymon Jacob
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Robert Y Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Rex A Cardan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Richard Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jeffrey W Nix
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - John B Fiveash
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Andrew M McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fujii K, Nakano M, Kawakami S, Tanaka Y, Kainuma T, Tsumura H, Tabata KI, Satoh T, Iwamura M, Ishiyama H. Dosimetric Predictors of Toxicity after Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Single-Institutional Experience of 145 Patients. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5062-5071. [PMID: 37232841 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30050383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The indications for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer have increased. However, the relationships between adverse events and risk factors remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify associations between adverse events and dose index for prostate SBRT. Participants comprised 145 patients irradiated with 32-36 Gy in 4 fractions. Radiotherapy-related risk factors such as dose-volume histogram parameters and patient-related risk factors such as T stage and Gleason score were evaluated in a competing risk analysis. Median follow-up duration was 42.9 months. A total of 9.7% had acute Grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities and 4.8% had acute Grade ≥ 2 GI toxicities. A total of 11.1% had late Grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities and 7.6% had late Grade ≥ 2 GI toxicities. Two (1.4%) patients suffered from late Grade 3 GU toxicities. Similarly, two (1.4%) patients suffered from late Grade 3 GI toxicities. Acute GU and GI events correlated with prostate volume and dose to the hottest 10 cc volume (D10cc)/volumes receiving a minimum of 30 Gy (V30 Gy) of rectum, respectively. Late GI toxicity, frequency, and rectal hemorrhage correlated with rectal D0.1 cc/D1 cc, maximum dose to the bladder, and rectal D0.1 cc, respectively. Toxicities after prostate SBRT using 32-36 Gy/4 fractions were acceptable. Our analysis showed that acute toxicities correlated with volume receiving a medium dose level, and late toxicities correlated with highest point dose of organs at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyohei Fujii
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University Hospital, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Masahiro Nakano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Shogo Kawakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Yuichi Tanaka
- Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kitasato University, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Takuro Kainuma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Hideyasu Tsumura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Tabata
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Takefumi Satoh
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ishiyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minamiku, Sagamiharashi 252-0329, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Repka MC, Carrasquilla M, Paydar I, Wu B, Lei S, Suy S, Collins SP, Kole TP. Dosimetric predictors of acute bowel toxicity after Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:174-179. [PMID: 36826994 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2180661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION SBRT is an increasingly popular treatment for localized prostate cancer, though considerable variation in technical approach is common and optimal dose constraints are uncertain. In this study, we sought to identify dosimetric and patient-related predictors of acute rectal toxicity. METHODS Patients included in this study were treated with prostate SBRT on a prospective institutional protocol. Physician-graded toxicity and patient-reported outcomes were captured at one week, one month, and three months following SBRT. DVH data were extracted and converted into relative volume differential DVHs for NTCP modeling. Patient- and disease-related covariates along with NTCP model predictions were independently tested for significant association with physician-graded toxicity or a decline in bowel-related QoL. A multivariate model was constructed using forward selection, and significant parameter cutoff values were obtained with Fischer's exact test to group patients by risk of developing physician-graded toxicity or detriments in patient-reported QoL. RESULTS One hundred and three patients treated for localized prostate cancer with SBRT were included in our analysis. 52% of patients experienced a clinically significant decline in bowel-related QOL within 1 week of completion of treatment, while only 27.5% of patients developed grade 2+ physician-graded rectal toxicity. Sequential feature selection multivariate logistic regression identified rectal V22.5 Gy (p = 0.001) and D19% (p = 0.001) as independent predictors of clinically significant toxicity, while rectal V20Gy (p = 0.004) and D25.3% (p = 0.007) were independently correlated with physician-graded toxicity. Global multivariate step-wise logistic regression identified only D19% (p = 0.001) and V20Gy (p = 0.004) as independent predictors of acute bowel bother or physician-graded rectal toxicity respectively. CONCLUSIONS Moderate doses to large rectal volumes, D19% and V20Gy, were associated with an increased incidence of a clinically significant decrease in patient-reported bowel QOL and physician-scored grade 2+ rectal toxicity, respectively. These dosimetric parameters may help practitioners mitigate acute toxicity in patients treated with prostate SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Repka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michael Carrasquilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Binbin Wu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Siyuan Lei
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Thomas P Kole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Valley Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Care, Paramus, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Skrobala A, Kruszyna-Mochalska M, Graczyk K, Ryczkowski A, Fundowicz M, Milecki P, Malicki J. Radiotherapy planning in a prostate cancer phantom model with intraprostatic dominant lesions using stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arcs and a simultaneous integrated boost. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1147593. [PMID: 37188175 PMCID: PMC10175813 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1147593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim In the treatment of prostate cancer with radiation therapy, the addition of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL) may improve local control. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal radiation strategy in a phantom model of prostate cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT-VMAT) with a SIB of 1-4 DILs. Methods We designed and printed a three-dimensional anthropomorphic phantom pelvis to simulate individual patient structures, including the prostate gland. A total of 36.25 Gy (SBRT) was delivered to the whole prostate. The DILs were irradiated with four different doses (40, 45, 47.5, and 50 Gy) to assess the influence of different SIB doses on dose distribution. The doses were calculated, verified, and measured using both transit and non-transit dosimetry for patient-specific quality assurance using a phantom model. Results The dose coverage met protocol requirements for all targets. However, the dose was close to violating risk constraints to the rectum when four DILs were treated simultaneously or when the DILs were located in the posterior segments of the prostate. All verification plans passed the assumed tolerance criteria. Conclusions Moderate dose escalation up to 45 Gy seems appropriate in cases with DILs located in posterior prostate segments or if there are three or more DILs located in other segments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Skrobala
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
- *Correspondence: Agnieszka Skrobala,
| | - Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Kinga Graczyk
- Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Adam Ryczkowski
- Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Magdalena Fundowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology I, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Piotr Milecki
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Radiation Oncology I, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Julian Malicki
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hadigal SR, Gupta AK. Application of Hydrogel Spacer SpaceOAR Vue for Prostate Radiotherapy. Tomography 2022; 8:2648-2661. [PMID: 36412680 PMCID: PMC9680261 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8060221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Damage in the surrounding structures, including the rectum, due to unintended exposure to radiation is a large burden to bear for patients who undergo radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The use of injectable rectal spacers to distance the anterior rectum from the prostate is a potential strategy to reduce the dose of unintended radiation to the rectum. Hydrogel spacers are gaining increasing popularity in the treatment regimen for prostate cancer. After FDA approval of SpaceOAR, specialists are receiving an increasing number of referrals for hydrogel placements. In this paper, we review hydrogel spacers, the supporting clinical data, the best practices for hydrogel placement, and the risk of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Atul K. Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Rochester General Hospital, 1425 Portland Ave, Rochester, NY 14621, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Novikov SN, Novikov RV, Merezhko YO, Gotovchikova MY, Ilin ND, Melnik YS, Kanaev SV. A comparison between high dose rate brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy boost after elective pelvic irradiation for high and very high-risk prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol J 2022; 40:200-207. [PMID: 36200309 PMCID: PMC9535414 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2022.00339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To compare biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and toxicity outcomes of high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost after elective nodal irradiation for high/very high-risk prostate cancer.Materials and Methods: a retrospective analysis was performed in 149 male. In 98 patients, the boost to the prostate was delivered by HDRB as 2 fractions of 10 Gy (EQD2 for α/β = 1.5; 66 Gy) or 1 fraction of 15 Gy (EQD2 for α/β = 1.5; 71 Gy). In 51 male, SBRT was used for the boost delivery (3 fractions of 7 Gy; EQD2Gy for α/β = 1.5; 51 Gy) because brachytherapy equipment was out of order.Results: In 98 patients that received HDRB boost, 3- and 5-year BRFS were 74.6% and 66.8%. Late grade-II genitourinary toxicity was detected in 27, grade-III in 1 case. Grade-II (maximum) rectal toxicity was diagnosed in nine patients. For 51 male patients that received SBRT boost, 3- and 5-year BRFS was 76.5% and 67.7%. Late grade-II (maximum) genitourinary toxicity was detected in five cases, late grade-II rectal toxicity in four cases. Other three patients developed late grade-III–IV rectal toxicity that required diverting colostomy. SBRT boost was associated with higher maximum dose to 2 cm3 of anterior rectal wall (D2cm³rectum) compared to HDRB: 92% versus 55% of dose to prostate. Severe rectal toxicity was negligible at EQD2 D2cm³rectum <85 Gy and EQD2 D5cm³ rectum <75 Gy.Conclusion: Our results indicate similar 3- and 5-year BRFS in patients with high/very high-risk prostate cancer who received HDRB or SBRT boost, but SBRT boost is associated with higher rate of severe late rectal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey Nikolaevich Novikov
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia
- Correspondence: Sergey Nikolaevich Novikov Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Leningradskaya, 68, St Petersburg, 197758, Russia. Tel: +79500437996 Fax +78125968609 E-mail:
| | - Roman Vladimirovich Novikov
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Yurii Olegovich Merezhko
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Mariya Yurevna Gotovchikova
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Nikolai Dmitrievich Ilin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Yulia Sergeevna Melnik
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Sergey Vasilevich Kanaev
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Correa RJM, Loblaw A. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Hitting Harder, Faster, and Smarter in High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:889132. [PMID: 35875062 PMCID: PMC9301671 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.889132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a technologically sophisticated form of radiotherapy that holds significant potential to effectively treat high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC). Prostate SBRT has been the subject of intense investigation in the context of low- and intermediate-risk disease, but less so for HRPC. However, emerging data are demonstrating its potential to safely and efficiently delivery curative doses of radiotherapy, both to the prostate and elective lymph nodes. SBRT theoretically hits harder through radiobiological dose escalation facilitated by ultra-hypofractionation (UHRT), faster with only five treatment fractions, and smarter by using targeted, focal dose escalation to maximally ablate the dominant intraprostatic lesion (while maximally protecting normal tissues). To achieve this, advanced imaging modalities like magnetic resonance imaging and prostate specific membrane antigen positron emmission tomography (PSMA-PET) are leveraged in combination with cutting-edge radiotherapy planning and delivery technology. In this focused narrative review, we discuss key evidence and upcoming clinical trials evaluating SBRT for HRPC with a focus on dose escalation, elective nodal irradiation, and focal boost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohann J. M. Correa
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Health Policy, Measurement and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- *Correspondence: Andrew Loblaw,
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nigogosyan Z, Ippolito JE, Collins SP, Wang EC. Prostate MRI in Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment Planning and Delivery for Localized Prostate Cancer. Radiographics 2022; 42:1251-1264. [PMID: 35714039 DOI: 10.1148/rg.210114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Prostate MRI is increasingly being used to make diagnoses and guide management for patients receiving definitive radiation treatment for prostate cancer. Radiologists should be familiar with the potential uses of prostate MRI in radiation therapy planning and delivery. Radiation therapy is an established option for the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an external-beam radiation therapy method used to deliver a high dose of radiation to an extracranial target in the body, often in five or fewer fractions. SBRT is increasingly being used for prostate cancer treatment and has been recognized by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network as an acceptable definitive treatment regimen for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer. MRI is commonly used to aid in prostate radiation therapy. The authors review the uses of prostate MRI in SBRT treatment planning and delivery. Specific topics discussed include the use of prostate MRI for identification of and dose reduction to the membranous and prostatic urethra, which can decrease the risk of acute and late toxicities. MRI is also useful for identification and appropriate dose coverage of the prostate apex and areas of extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle invasion. In prospective studies, prostate MRI is being validated for identification of and dose intensification to dominant intraprostatic lesions, which potentially can improve oncologic outcomes. It also can be used to evaluate the placement of fiducial markers and hydrogel spacers for radiation therapy planning and delivery. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zack Nigogosyan
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| | - Joseph E Ippolito
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| | - Sean P Collins
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| | - Edina C Wang
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO (Z.N., J.E.I.); and Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007 (S.P.C., E.C.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cellular Damage in the Target and Out-Of-Field Peripheral Organs during VMAT SBRT Prostate Radiotherapy: An In Vitro Phantom-Based Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112712. [PMID: 35681692 PMCID: PMC9179488 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary New developments show that patients with prostate cancer can benefit from radiotherapy delivered with a hypo-fractionated regimen. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of hypo-fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of prostate cancer on out-of-field organs. We used a humanoid phantom to irradiate prostate cells in conditions similar to patient therapy, using SBRT planning. Our results show that radiation doses in the location of the intestine and lung resulted in significantly higher radiation doses than the further locations. We observed a high radiotoxic effect in the cells irradiated in the prostate, and a small increase in DNA damage and cell killing in the intestine location. Gene expression analysis revealed significant enrichment of the biological processes related to the radiation response in the prostate. In the lung and thyroid, the enrichment of several gene groups was revealed, however the processes were not clearly related to the response to radiation. Our study provides extensive data on out-of-field safety of prostate SBRT. Abstract Hypo-fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). Although many studies have investigated the effects of SBRT on the prostate and adjacent organs, little is known about the effects further out-of-field. The aim of this study was to investigate, both in vitro and in a quasi-humanoid phantom, the biological effects (using a dose-scaling approach) of radiation in the out-of-field peripheral organs delivered by 6 MV volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) SBRT in a prostate cancer model. Healthy prostate cells were irradiated in a phantom at locations corresponding to the prostate, intestine, lung, thyroid, and brain. Seven 10 Gy fractions of VMAT SBRT were delivered to the target in a single session without intermission (scaled-up method). Radiochromic films were used to measure the doses. The radiobiological response was assessed by measuring DNA breaks, the cell survival fraction, and differences in gene expression profile. Our results showed a strong, multiparametric radiobiological response of the cells in the prostate. Outside of the radiation field, the highest doses were observed in the intestine and lung. A small increase (not statistically significant) in DNA damage and cell death was observed in the intestines. Several gene groups (cell cycle, DNA replication) were depleted in the lung and thyroid (DNA replication, endocytosis), but further analysis revealed no changes in the relevant biological processes. This study provides extensive evidence of the types and extent of radiobiological responses during VMAT SBRT in a prostate cancer model. Additional research is needed to determine whether the radiobiological effects observed in the peripheral organs are validated in a clinical context.
Collapse
|
20
|
Kissel M, Créhange G, Graff P. Stereotactic Radiation Therapy versus Brachytherapy: Relative Strengths of Two Highly Efficient Options for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2226. [PMID: 35565355 PMCID: PMC9105931 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a valid option for the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. In randomized trials, it was found not inferior to conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). It also compares favorably to brachytherapy (BT) even if level 1 evidence is lacking. However, BT remains a strong competitor, especially for young patients, as series with 10-15 years of median follow-up have proven its efficacy over time. SBRT will thus have to confirm its effectiveness over the long-term as well. SBRT has the advantage over BT of less acute urinary toxicity and, more hypothetically, less sexual impairment. Data are limited regarding SBRT for high-risk disease while BT, as a boost after EBRT, has demonstrated superiority against EBRT alone in randomized trials. However, patients should be informed of significant urinary toxicity. SBRT is under investigation in strategies of treatment intensification such as combination of EBRT plus SBRT boost or focal dose escalation to the tumor site within the prostate. Our goal was to examine respective levels of evidence of SBRT and BT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in terms of oncologic outcomes, toxicity and quality of life, and to discuss strategies of treatment intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pierre Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; (M.K.); (G.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Repka MC, Creswell M, Lischalk JW, Carrasquilla M, Forsthoefel M, Lee J, Lei S, Aghdam N, Kataria S, Obayomi-Davies O, Collins BT, Suy S, Hankins RA, Collins SP. Rationale for Utilization of Hydrogel Rectal Spacers in Dose Escalated SBRT for the Treatment of Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:860848. [PMID: 35433457 PMCID: PMC9008358 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.860848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review we outline the current evidence for the use of hydrogel rectal spacers in the treatment paradigm for prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy. We review their development, summarize clinical evidence, risk of adverse events, best practices for placement, treatment planning considerations and finally we outline a framework and rationale for the utilization of rectal spacers when treating unfavorable risk prostate cancer with dose escalated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Repka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Michael Creswell
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology at New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYCyberKnife, New York, NY, United States
| | - Michael Carrasquilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Matthew Forsthoefel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy Centers of Kentuckiana, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Jacqueline Lee
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Siyuan Lei
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Shaan Kataria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arlington & Reston Radiation Oncology, Arlington, VA, United States
| | - Olusola Obayomi-Davies
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellstar Kennestone Hospital, Marietta, GA, United States
| | - Brian T Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Ryan A Hankins
- Department of Urology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kawakami S, Tsumura H, Satoh T, Tabata K, Sekiguchi A, Kainuma T, Nakano M, Iwamura M, Ishiyama H. A phase II trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy in 4 fractions for patients with localized prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:67. [PMID: 35379264 PMCID: PMC8978412 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02037-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose/objective(s)
To report results from our phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivering 36 Gy in 4 fractions for patients with localized prostate cancer.
Materials/methods
We enrolled 55 patients treated with SBRT delivering 36 Gy in 4 fractions between 2015 to 2018. All patients were categorized as low-risk (n = 4), intermediate-risk (n = 31) or high-risk (n = 20) according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. Median age was 73 years (range 54–86 years). Two-thirds of patients (n = 37) had received androgen-deprivation therapy for 3–46 months (median, 31 months). Median duration of follow-up was 36 months (range 1–54 months). We used Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and National Cancer Institute—Common Toxicity Criteria version 4 for toxicity assessments. Quality of life (QOL) outcomes were also evaluated using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC).
Results
Protocol treatments were completed for all patients. Six patients experienced biochemical failures. Among these six patients, three patients experienced clinical failure. One patient showed bone metastasis before biochemical failure. One patient died of gastric cancer. The 3-year biochemical control rate was 89.8%. Acute grade 2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were observed in 5 patients (9%) and 6 patients (11%), respectively. No grade 3 or higher acute toxicities were observed. Late grade 2 GU and GI toxicities were observed in 7 patients (13%) and 4 patients (7%), respectively. Late grade 3 GU and GI toxicities were observed in 1 patient (1.8%) each. EPIC scores decreased slightly during the acute phase and recovered within 3 months after treatment.
Conclusion
Our phase II study showed that SBRT delivering 36 Gy in 4 fractions was safe and effective with favorable QOL outcomes, although this regimen showed slightly more severe toxicities compared to current standards.
Collapse
|
23
|
Chen L, Gannavarapu BS, Desai NB, Folkert MR, Dohopolski M, Gao A, Ahn C, Cadeddu J, Bagrodia A, Woldu S, Raj GV, Roehrborn C, Lotan Y, Timmerman RD, Garant A, Hannan R. Dose-Intensified Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Localized Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:779182. [PMID: 35265519 PMCID: PMC8899031 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.779182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) has been increasingly used in prostate cancer (PCa) given its convenience and cost efficacy. Optimal doses remain poorly defined with limited prospective comparative trials and long-term safety/efficacy data at higher dose levels. We analyzed toxicity and outcomes for SAbR in men with localized PCa at escalated 45 Gy in 5 fractions. Methods and Materials This study retrospectively analyzed men from 2015 to 2019 with PCa who received linear-accelerator-based SAbR to 45 Gy in 5 fractions, along with perirectal hydrogel spacer, fiducial placement, and MRI-based planning. Disease control outcomes were calculated from end of treatment. Minimally important difference (MID) assessing patient-reported quality of life was defined as greater than a one-half standard deviation increase in American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score after SAbR. Results Two-hundred and forty-nine (249) low-, intermediate-, and high-risk PCa patients with median follow-up of 14.9 months for clinical toxicity were included. Acute urinary grade II toxicity occurred in 20.4% of patients. Acute grade II GI toxicity occurred in 7.3% of patients. For follow-up > 2 years (n = 69), late GU and GI grade ≥III toxicity occurred in 5.8% and 1.5% of patients, respectively. MID was evident in 31.8%, 23.4%, 35.8%, 37.0%, 33.3%, and 26.7% of patients at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. The median follow-up for biochemical recurrence was 22.6 months with biochemical failure-free survival of 100% at 1 year (n = 226) and 98.7% for years 2 (n = 113) and 3 (n = 54). Conclusions SAbR for PCa at 45 Gy in 5 fractions shows an encouraging safety profile. Prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted to establish this dose regimen as standard of care for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily Chen
- School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, United States
| | - Bhavani S Gannavarapu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Neil B Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Michael R Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Michael Dohopolski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Ang Gao
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas (UT) Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Chul Ahn
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas (UT) Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Jeffrey Cadeddu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Solomon Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Ganesh V Raj
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Claus Roehrborn
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Robert D Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Aurelie Garant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Alshak MN, Eidelberg A, Diaz SM, Stoddard MD, Formenti S, Nagar H, Kang J, Chughtai B. Natural history of lower urinary tract symptoms among men undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer with and without a Rectal Hydrogel Spacer. World J Urol 2022; 40:1143-1150. [PMID: 35182206 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03953-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for prostate cancer, but has morbidity as both the bladder and rectum are radiated during treatment. Our goal was to document and compare lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) among men who underwent SBRT with and without SpaceOAR hydrogel (Augmenix, Inc., Bedford, MA). METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 87 men (50 SpaceOAR and 37 non-SpaceOAR) who underwent SBRT. Primary outcomes were patient reported symptoms during radiation therapy, pharmacotherapy usage, and urologic and bowel survey scores up to 6-months post-SBRT. RESULTS 78% of men were on α-inhibitors at the end of SBRT, an increase from 27.6% baseline usage (p < 0.001). Post-SBRT urinary frequency was more common in the non-SpaceOAR group versus the SpaceOAR group (68% versus 38%, p = 0.006), as was nocturia (35% vs. 8%, p = 0.002). Acute gastrointestinal symptoms did not differ. 58.8% of men were on α-inhibitors at 6-months of follow-up post-SBRT, an increase from 27.6% baseline usage (p < 0.001). Importantly, there was a difference of α-inhibitor use between non-SpaceOAR and SpaceOAR groups at the end of SBRT and at 1.5-, 3-, and 6-months follow up (86% vs. 53% [p = 0.002], 83% vs. 53% [p = 0.005], 72% vs. 49% [p = 0.038], respectively). CONCLUSION LUTS after SBRT remains a significant problem for men undergoing treatment for prostate cancer. LUTS affects men during and up to 6-months following SBRT. Owing to these increased LUTS, preemptive minimally invasive solutions and their mechanisms of protection, including the SpaceOAR, should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Susana Martinez Diaz
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelina D Stoddard
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Silvia Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Josephine Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bilal Chughtai
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yamazaki H, Suzuki G, Aibe N, Shimizu D, Kimoto T, Masui K, Yoshida K, Nakamura S, Hashimoto Y, Okabe H. Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy versus Conventional to Moderate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:195. [PMID: 35008358 PMCID: PMC8750001 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the toxicity (first endpoint) and efficacy (second endpoint) of ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF) and dose-escalated conventional to moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (DeRT) for clinically localized prostate cancer. We compared 253 patients treated with UHF and 499 patients treated with DeRT using multi-institutional retrospective data. To analyze toxicity, we divided UHF into High-dose UHF (H-UHF; equivalent doses of 2 Gy per fraction: EQD2 > 100 Gy1.5) and low-dose UHF (L-UHF; EQD2 ≤ 100 Gy1.5). In toxicity, H-UHF elevated for 3 years accumulated late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity grade ≥ 2 (11.1% and 9.3%) more than L-UHF (3% and 1.2%) and DeRT (3.1% and 4.8%, p = 0.00126 and p = 0.00549). With median follow-up periods of 32.0 and 61.7 months, the actuarial 3-year biochemical failure-free survival rates were 100% (100% and 100% in the L-UHF and H-UHF) and 96.3% in the low-risk group, 96.5% (97.1% and 95.6%) and 94.9% in the intermediate-risk group, and 93.7% (100% and 94.6%) and 91.7% in the high-risk group in the UHF and DeRT groups, respectively. UHF showed equivocal efficacy, although not conclusive but suggestive due to a short follow-up period of UHF. L-UHF using EQD2 ≤ 100 Gy1.5 is a feasible UHF schedule with a good balance between toxicity and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-Ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
| | - Gen Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-Ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-Ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
| | - Daisuke Shimizu
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-Ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
| | - Takuya Kimoto
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-Ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
| | - Koji Masui
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-Ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
| | - Ken Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata 573-1010, Japan
| | - Satoaki Nakamura
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata 573-1010, Japan
| | - Yasutoshi Hashimoto
- Department of Radiology, Ujitakeda Hospital, Uji-City, Kyoto 611-0021, Japan
| | - Haruumi Okabe
- Department of Radiology, Ujitakeda Hospital, Uji-City, Kyoto 611-0021, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hannan R, Salamekh S, Desai NB, Garant A, Folkert MR, Costa DN, Mannala S, Ahn C, Mohamad O, Laine A, Kim DWN, Dickinson T, Raj GV, Shah RB, Wang J, Jia X, Choy H, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y, Timmerman RD. SAbR for High-Risk Prostate Cancer-A Prospective Multilevel MRI-Based Dose Escalation Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 113:290-301. [PMID: 34774676 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.10.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation dose intensification improves outcome in men with high-risk prostate cancer (HR-PCa). A prospective trial was conducted to determine safety, feasibility, and maximal tolerated dose of multilevel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based 5-fraction SAbR in patients with HR-PCa. METHODS AND MATERIALS This phase I clinical trial enrolled patients with HR-PCa with grade group ≥4, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥20 ng/mL, or radiographic ≥T3, and well-defined prostatic lesions on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) into 4 dose-escalation cohorts. The initial cohort received 47.5 Gy to the prostate, 50 Gy to mpMRI-defined intraprostatic lesion(s), and 22.5 Gy to pelvic lymph nodes in 5 fractions. Radiation doses were escalated for pelvic nodes to 25 Gy and mpMRI lesion(s) to 52.5 Gy and then 55 Gy. Escalation was performed sequentially according to rule-based trial design with 7 to 15 patients per cohort and a 90-day observation period. All men received peri-rectal hydrogel spacer, intraprostatic fiducial placement, and 2 years of androgen deprivation. The primary endpoint was maximal tolerated dose according to a 90-day acute dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate <33%. DLT was defined as National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events ≥grade 3 treatment-related toxicity. Secondary outcomes included acute and delayed gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) toxicity graded with Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS Fifty-five of the 62 enrolled patients were included in the analysis. Dose was escalated through all 4 cohorts without observing any DLTs. Median overall follow-up was 18 months, with a median follow-up of 42, 24, 12, and 7.5 months for cohorts 1 to 4 respectively. Acute and late grade 2 GU toxicities were 25% and 20%, while GI were 13% and 7%, respectively. Late grade 3 GU and GI toxicities were 2% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS SAbR dose for HR-PCa was safely escalated with multilevel dose painting of 47.5 Gy to prostate, 55 Gy to mpMRI-defined intraprostatic lesions, and 25 Gy to pelvic nodal region in 5 fractions. Longer and ongoing follow-up will be required to assess late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chul Ahn
- Population and Data Science, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Aaron Laine
- The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Fort Worth, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Xun Jia
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
| | - Hak Choy
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
| | | | | | - Robert D Timmerman
- Departments of Radiation Oncology; Neurosurgery, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Benhmida S, Beneux A, Udrescu C, Rouviere O, Horn S, Enachescu C, Lapierre A, Chapet O. Dosimetric feasibility of stereotactic irradiation of primary prostate cancer at 5x9 Gy with a method of urethral sparing. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210142. [PMID: 34283647 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The most commonly used dose for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is 5 × 7.25 Gy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric feasibility of a 5 × 9 Gy SBRT regimen while still limiting the dose to the urethra to 5 × 7.25 Gy. This dosimetric study is part of the groundwork for a future Phase III randomized trial. METHODS The prostate, the urethra and the tumors were delineated on 20 dosimetric CT-scans with MRI-registration. The planning target volume (PTVp) was defined as a 5 mm expansion (3 mm posteriorly) of the prostate. The planning at risk volume (PRVu) was defined as a 2 mm expansion of the urethra. The tumors were delineated on the MRI (GTVt) and a 3 mm-margin was added to create a tumoral planning target volume (PTVt). IMRT plans were optimized to deliver 5 × 9 Gy to the PTVp, limiting the dose to the PRVu to 5 × 7.25 Gy. Results are presented using average (range) values. RESULTS PTVp doses were D98% = 36.2 Gy (35.6-36.8), D2% = 46.9 Gy (46.5-47.5) and mean dose = 44.1 Gy (43.8-44.5). The dose to the PRVu was within tolerance limits for all 20 patients: V34.4Gy = 99.8% (99.2-100) and D5% = 38.7 Gy (38.6-38.8). Dose coverage of PTV-PRVu was D95% = 40.6 Gy (40.5-40.9), D5% = 46.6 Gy (46.2-47.2) and mean dose = 44.6 Gy (44.3-44.9). Dose to the PTVt reached 44.6 Gy (41.2-45.9). Doses to the OAR were respected, except V36Gy ≤1 cc for the rectum. CONCLUSION A SBRT dose-escalation to 5 × 9 Gy on the prostate while sparing the urethra + 2 mm at 36.25 Gy is feasible without compromising dose coverage to the tumor. This radiation regimen will be used for a Phase-III trial. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE In prostate SBRT, dose optimization on the urethra is feasible and could decrease urinary toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salim Benhmida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Amandine Beneux
- Department of Medical Physics and Radioprotection, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Corina Udrescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Olivier Rouviere
- Department of Urological Radiology, Hopital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Samy Horn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Ciprian Enachescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Ariane Lapierre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Olivier Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Musunuru HB, Cheung P, Vesprini D, Liu SK, Chu W, Chung HT, Morton G, Deabreu A, Davidson M, Ravi A, Helou J, Ho L, Zhang L, Loblaw A. Gantry-Based 5-Fraction Elective Nodal Irradiation in Unfavorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: Outcomes From 2 Prospective Studies Comparing SABR Boost With MR Dose-Painted HDR Brachytherapy Boost. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:735-743. [PMID: 34637882 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario recommend brachytherapy boost for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer. SABR is an emerging technique for prostate cancer, but its use in high-risk disease is limited. Efficacy, toxic effects, and quality of life (QoL) were compared in patients treated on 2 prospective protocols that used SABR boost or magnetic resonance-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost with 6 to 18 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS AND MATERIALS In SATURN study (study 1), patients received 40 Gy to the prostate and 25 Gy to the pelvis in 5 weekly fractions. In SPARE (study 2), patients received HDR-BT (15 Gy × 1) to the prostate and ≤22.5 Gy to the magnetic resonance imaging nodule, followed by 25 Gy in 5 weekly fractions to the pelvis. All patients received between 6 and 18 months of ADT. RESULTS Thirty patients (7% unfavorable intermediate risk and 93% high risk, per National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] criteria) completed study 1, and 31 patients (3% favorable intermediate risk, 47% unfavorable intermediate risk, and 50% high risk) completed treatment as per study 2. The median follow-up times were 72 and 62 months, respectively. In study 2, 6 patients had biochemical failure, and all 6 developed metastatic disease. Actuarial 5-year biochemical failure was 0% for study 1 and 18.2% for study 2 (P = .005). There was no significant difference in the worst acute or late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity. Grade 3 late genitourinary toxicity was noted in 3% of the patients in study 2 (HDR-BT boost). There was either no significant difference or minimal clinically important change in QoL. CONCLUSIONS In the context of 5-fraction pelvic radiation therapy and ADT, there did not appear to be a significant difference in toxicity or QoL between SABR and HDR-BT boost. Although efficacy favored the SABR boost cohort, this should be viewed in the context of limitations and biases associated with comparing 2 sequential phase 2 studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hima Bindu Musunuru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Stanley K Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Hans T Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Joelle Helou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Ling Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Liying Zhang
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lucchini R, Panizza D, Colciago RR, Vernier V, Daniotti MC, Faccenda V, Arcangeli S. Treatment outcome and compliance to dose-intensified linac-based SBRT for unfavorable prostate tumors using a novel real-time organ-motion tracking. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:180. [PMID: 34535168 PMCID: PMC8447697 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01908-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To report preliminary data on treatment outcome and compliance to dose-intensified organ sparing SBRT for prostate cancer using a novel electromagnetic transmitter-based tracking system (RayPilotÒ System) to account for intra-fractional organ motion. MATERIAL/METHODS Thirteen patients with intermediate unfavorable (9) and selected high-risk (4) prostate cancer underwent dose-escalated SBRT in 4 or 5 fractions (BED1.5 = 279 Gy and 253 Gy, respectively). The VMAT treatment consisted in two 6FFF or 10FFF full arcs optimized to have the 95% isodose covering at least 95% of the PTV (2 mm isotropic expansion of the CTV). Whenever the real-time tracking registered a displacement that exceeded 2 mm during the setup and/or the beam delivery, the treatment was interrupted and the prostate motion was promptly corrected. The incidence of treatment-related genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, patient QoL and PSA outcomes were computed from the start of treatment to the last follow-up date. RESULTS All patients completed the treatment in the expected time (10.2 +/- 4.2 minutes) and their compliance to the procedure was excellent. No clinically significant acute Grade 2 or higher GI (rectal) and GU side effects were observed within 90 days from the treatment completion. The median IPSS increased from 8 at baseline to 12 one-month after treatment and settled to 6 at 3 months. EPIC-26 scores in the urinary domain decreased from a median baseline of 86 pre-treatment to 79 at one-month and returned to baseline at a later timepoint (median score of 85 at 3 months). EPIC-26 scores in the bowel domains did not show significant changes within 3 months following RT. The prostate was found within 1 mm from its initial position in 78% of the beam-on time, between 1 and 2 mm in 20%, and exceeded 2 mm only in 2%, after correction for motion which was performed in 45% of the fractions, either during setup or beam delivery. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary findings show that dose intensified SBRT for unfavorable prostate tumors does not come at the cost of an increased toxicity, provided that a reliable technique for real time prostate monitoring is ensured. Fast FFF beams contributed to reduce intra-fractional motion. These observations need to be confirmed on a larger scale and a longer follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella Lucchini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Denis Panizza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ray Colciago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy.
| | - Veronica Vernier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Valeria Faccenda
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
- Department of Physics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Folkert MR, Zelefsky MJ, Hannan R, Desai NB, Lotan Y, Laine AM, Kim DWN, Neufeld SH, Hornberger B, Kollmeier MA, McBride S, Ahn C, Roehrborn C, Timmerman RD. A Multi-Institutional Phase 2 Trial of High-Dose SAbR for Prostate Cancer Using Rectal Spacer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:101-109. [PMID: 33753140 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE High-dose SABR for prostate cancer offers the radiobiologic potency of the most intensified radiation therapy regimens but was associated with >90% rates of ulceration of the anterior rectal wall on endoscopic assessment; this infrequently progressed to severe rectal toxicity in prior prospective series. A multi-institutional phase 2 prospective trial was conducted to assess whether placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer would reduce acute periprostatic rectal ulcer events after high-dose (>40 Gy) SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients included men with stage ≤T2c localized grade group 1 to 3 prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≤15 ng/mL, American Urological Association Symptom Index = AUA-SI scores ≤18, and a gland volume ≤80 cm3. Patients underwent perirectal hydrogel spacer placement, followed by SABR of 45 Gy in 5 fractions every other day to the prostate only. Androgen deprivation was not allowed except for cytoreduction. The rectal wall was directly assessed by serial anoscopy during follow-up to determine whether the spacer would reduce acute periprostatic rectal ulcer events from >90% to <70% within 9 months of treatment. RESULTS Forty-four men were enrolled and 43 were eligible for protocol analysis. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 48 months. Acute periprostatic ulcers were observed in 6 of 42 patients (14.3%; 95% confidence interval, 6.0%-27%; P < .001) at a median of 2.9 months posttreatment (range, 1.7-5.6 months). All ulcers (grade 1, 5 ulcers; grade 2, 1 ulcer) resolved on repeat anoscopy within 8 months of incidence. There were no grade ≥3 late gastrointestinal toxicities; the incidence of late grade-2 gastrointestinal toxicities was 14.3%, with a prevalence at 3 years of 0%. No toxicities greater than grade 3 occurred in any domain. Four-year freedom from biochemical failure was 93.8% (95% CI, 85.2%-100.0%). CONCLUSIONS Temporary hydrogel spacer placement before high-dose SABR treatment for localized prostate cancer and use of strict dose constraints are associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of rectal ulcer events compared with prior phase 1/2 trial results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Neil B Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Aaron M Laine
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Weatherford, Texas
| | - D W Nathan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sarah Hardee Neufeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Brad Hornberger
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Marisa A Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chul Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Claus Roehrborn
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Robert D Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Farjam R, Mahase SS, Chen SL, Coonce M, Pennell RT, Fecteau R, Chughtai B, Dewyngaert JK, Kang J, Ch Formenti S, Nagar H. Quantifying the impact of SpaceOAR hydrogel on inter-fractional rectal and bladder dose during 0.35 T MR-guided prostate adaptive radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:49-58. [PMID: 34342134 PMCID: PMC8425860 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the impact of rectal spacing on inter-fractional rectal and bladder dose and the need for adaptive planning in prostate cancer patients undergoing SBRT with a 0.35 T MRI-Linac. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated and compared SBRT plans from prostate cancer patients with and without rectal spacer who underwent treatment on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac. Each group consisted of 10 randomly selected patients that received prostate SBRT to a total dose of 36.25 Gy in five fractions. Dosimetric differences in planned and delivered rectal and bladder dose and the number of fractions violating OAR constraints were quantified. We also assessed whether adaptive planning was needed to meet constraints for each fraction. RESULTS On average, rectal spacing reduced the maximum dose delivered to the rectum by more than 8 Gy (p < 0.001). We also found that D3cc received by the rectum could be 12 Gy higher in patients who did not have rectal spacer (p < 9E-7). In addition, the results show that a rectal spacer can reduce the maximum dose and D15cc to the bladder wall by more than 1 (p < 0.004) and 8 (p < 0.009) Gy, respectively. Our study also shows that using a rectal spacer could reduce the necessity for adaptive planning. The incidence of dose constraint violation was observed in almost 91% of the fractions in patients without the rectal spacer and 52% in patients with implanted spacer. CONCLUSION Inter-fractional changes in rectal and bladder dose were quantified in patients who underwent SBRT with/without rectal SpaceOAR hydrogel. Rectal spacer does not eliminate the need for adaptive planning but reduces its necessity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Farjam
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Sean S. Mahase
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Shu Ling Chen
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Madeline Coonce
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Ryan T. Pennell
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Ryan Fecteau
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Bilal Chughtai
- Department of UrologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Josephine Kang
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Silvia Ch Formenti
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Graff P, Crehange G. [Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: Results, limits and prospects]. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:684-691. [PMID: 34274223 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Still an emerging approach a few years ago, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has ranked as a valid option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Inherent properties of prostatic adenocarcinoma (low α/β) make it the perfect candidate. We propose a critical review of the literature trying to put results into perspective to identify their strengths, limits and axes of development. Technically sophisticated, the stereotactic irradiation of the prostate is well tolerated. Despite the fact that median follow-up of published data is still limited, ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy seems very efficient for the treatment of low and intermediate risk prostate cancers. Data seem satisfying for high-risk cancers as well. New developments are being studied with a main interest in treatment intensification for unfavorable intermediate risk and high-risk cancers. Advantage is taken of the sharp dose gradient of stereotactic radiotherapy to offer safe reirradiation to patients with local recurrence in a previously irradiated area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Graff
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - G Crehange
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ishiyama H, Tsumura H, Nagano H, Watanabe M, Mizuno E, Taka M, Kobayashi H, Eriguchi T, Imada H, Inaba K, Nakamura K. Multi-institutional retrospective analysis of ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy for Japanese prostate cancer patients. Sci Rep 2021; 11:13194. [PMID: 34162908 PMCID: PMC8222240 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92307-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
To report outcomes and risk factors of ultrahypofractionated (UHF) radiotherapy for Japanese prostate cancer patients. This multi-institutional retrospective analysis comprised 259 patients with localized prostate cancer from 6 hospitals. A total dose of 35–36 Gy in 4–5 fractions was prescribed for sequential or alternate-day administration. Biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix ASTRO consensus. Toxicities were assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 4. Tumor control and toxicity rates were analyzed by competing risk frames. Median follow-up duration was 32 months (range 22–97 months). 2- and 3-year biochemical control rates were 97.7% and 96.4%, respectively. Initial prostate-specific antigen (p < 0.01) and neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (p < 0.05) were identified as risk factors for biochemical recurrence. 2- and 3-year cumulative ≥ Grade 2 late genitourinary (GU) toxicities were 5.8% and 7.4%, respectively. Corresponding rates of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were 3.9% and 4.5%, respectively. Grade 3 rates were lower than 1% for both GU and GI toxicities. No grade 4 or higher toxicities were encountered. Biologically effective dose was identified as a risk factor for ≥ Grade 2 late GU and GI toxicities (p < 0.05). UHF radiotherapy offered effective, safe treatment for Japanese prostate cancer with short-term follow-up. Our result suggest higher prescribed doses are related to higher toxicity rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromichi Ishiyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Hideyasu Tsumura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hisato Nagano
- Highly Accurate and Exact Radiation Therapy Center, Shonan Fujisawa Tokusyukai Hospital, 1-5-1 tsujido-kandai, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Motoi Watanabe
- Highly Accurate and Exact Radiation Therapy Center, Shonan Fujisawa Tokusyukai Hospital, 1-5-1 tsujido-kandai, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Eiichi Mizuno
- Toyama CyberKnife Center, 1837-5 Hiyodorijima, Toyama, Japan
| | - Masashi Taka
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Kouseiren Takaoka Hospital, 5-10 Eiraku-cho, Takaoka, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1 Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takahisa Eriguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1 Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hajime Imada
- Cancer Treatment Center, Tobata Kyoritsu Hospital, 2-5-1 Sawami, Tobata-ku, Kitakyusyu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Koji Inaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsumasa Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ebert MA, Gulliford S, Acosta O, de Crevoisier R, McNutt T, Heemsbergen WD, Witte M, Palma G, Rancati T, Fiorino C. Spatial descriptions of radiotherapy dose: normal tissue complication models and statistical associations. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:12TR01. [PMID: 34049304 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac0681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
For decades, dose-volume information for segmented anatomy has provided the essential data for correlating radiotherapy dosimetry with treatment-induced complications. Dose-volume information has formed the basis for modelling those associations via normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models and for driving treatment planning. Limitations to this approach have been identified. Many studies have emerged demonstrating that the incorporation of information describing the spatial nature of the dose distribution, and potentially its correlation with anatomy, can provide more robust associations with toxicity and seed more general NTCP models. Such approaches are culminating in the application of computationally intensive processes such as machine learning and the application of neural networks. The opportunities these approaches have for individualising treatment, predicting toxicity and expanding the solution space for radiation therapy are substantial and have clearly widespread and disruptive potential. Impediments to reaching that potential include issues associated with data collection, model generalisation and validation. This review examines the role of spatial models of complication and summarises relevant published studies. Sources of data for these studies, appropriate statistical methodology frameworks for processing spatial dose information and extracting relevant features are described. Spatial complication modelling is consolidated as a pathway to guiding future developments towards effective, complication-free radiotherapy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A Ebert
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- 5D Clinics, Claremont, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sarah Gulliford
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College Hospitals London, United Kingdom
- Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Oscar Acosta
- Univ Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI-UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France
| | | | - Todd McNutt
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Marnix Witte
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giuseppe Palma
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Napoli, Italy
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorino
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
A hierarchical fusion framework to integrate homogeneous and heterogeneous classifiers for medical decision-making. Knowl Based Syst 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
36
|
Wang K, Mavroidis P, Royce TJ, Falchook AD, Collins SP, Sapareto S, Sheets NC, Fuller DB, El Naqa I, Yorke E, Grimm J, Jackson A, Chen RC. Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: An Overview of Toxicity and Dose Response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 110:237-248. [PMID: 33358229 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultrahypofractionationed radiation therapy for prostate cancer is increasingly studied and adopted. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Biological Effects of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy therefore aimed to review studies examining toxicity and quality of life after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer and model its effect. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a systematic PubMed search of prostate SBRT studies published between 2001 and 2018. Those that analyzed factors associated with late urinary, bowel, or sexual toxicity and/or quality of life were included and reviewed. Normal tissue complication probability modelling was performed on studies that contained detailed dose/volume and outcome data. RESULTS We found 13 studies that examined urinary effects, 6 that examined bowel effects, and 4 that examined sexual effects. Most studies included patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer treated to 35-40 Gy. Most patients were treated with 5 fractions, with several centers using 4 fractions. Endpoints were heterogeneous and included both physician-scored toxicity and patient-reported quality of life. Most toxicities were mild-moderate (eg, grade 1-2) with a very low overall incidence of severe toxicity (eg, grade 3 or higher, usually <3%). Side effects were associated with both dosimetric and non-dosimetric factors. CONCLUSIONS Prostate SBRT appears to be overall well tolerated, with determinants of toxicity that include dosimetric factors and patient factors. Suggested dose constraints include bladder V(Rx Dose)Gy <5-10 cc, urethra Dmax <38-42 Gy, and rectum Dmax <35-38 Gy, though current data do not offer firm guidance on tolerance doses. Several areas for future research are suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Panayiotis Mavroidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Trevor J Royce
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Stephen Sapareto
- Department of Medical Physics, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Nathan C Sheets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jimm Grimm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
In reply to Afkhami Ardekani M et al. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:355-357. [PMID: 33296002 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01720-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
38
|
Gogineni E, Rana Z, Soberman D, Sidiqi B, D'Andrea V, Lee L, Potters L, Parashar B. Biochemical Control and Toxicity Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1232-1242. [PMID: 33171199 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have both shown acceptable outcomes in the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Minimal data have been published directly comparing rates of biochemical control and toxicity with these 2 modalities. We hypothesize that LDR and SBRT will provide similar rates of biochemical control. METHODS AND MATERIALS All low- and intermediate-risk patients with prostate cancer treated definitively with SBRT or LDR between 2010 and 2018 were captured. Phoenix definition was used for biochemical failure. Independent t tests were used to compare baseline characteristics, and repeated measure analysis of variance test was used to compare American Urologic Association (AUA) and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) scores between treatment arms over time. Biochemical control was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in acute and late toxicity were assessed via Pearson χ2. RESULTS In the study, 219 and 118 patients were treated with LDR and SBRT. Median follow-up was 4.3 years (interquartile range, 3.1-6.1). All patients treated with LDR received 125.0 Gy in a single fraction. SBRT consisted of 42.5 Gy in 5 fractions. Five-year biochemical control for LDR versus SBRT was 91.6% versus 97.6% (P = .108). LDR patients had a larger increase in mean AUA scores at 1 month (17.2 vs 10.3, P < .001) and 3 months posttreatment (14.0 vs 9.7, P < .001), and in mean EPIC scores at 1 month (15.7 vs 13.8, P < .001). There was no significant difference between LDR and SBRT in late grade 3 genitourinary toxicity (0.9% vs 2.5%, P = .238); however, LDR had lower rates of late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity (0.0% vs 2.5%, P = .018). CONCLUSIONS Our data show similar biochemical control and genitourinary toxicity rates at 5 years for both SBRT and LDR, with slightly higher gastrointestinal toxicity with SBRT and higher AUA and EPIC scores with LDR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emile Gogineni
- Academic Department of Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
| | - Zaker Rana
- Academic Department of Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
| | - Danielle Soberman
- Academic Department of Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
| | - Baho Sidiqi
- Academic Department of Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
| | - Vincent D'Andrea
- Academic Department of Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
| | - Lucille Lee
- Academic Department of Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
| | - Louis Potters
- Academic Department of Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
| | - Bhupesh Parashar
- Academic Department of Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Byun DJ, Gorovets DJ, Jacobs LM, Happersett L, Zhang P, Pei X, Burleson S, Zhang Z, Hunt M, McBride S, Kollmeier MA, Zelefsky MJ. Strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate SBRT: Does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference? Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:239. [PMID: 33066781 PMCID: PMC7565753 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01681-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate inter-fractional variations in bladder and rectum during prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and determine dosimetric and clinical consequences. Methods Eighty-five patients with 510 computed tomography (CT) images were analyzed. Median prescription dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Patients were instructed to maintain a full bladder and empty rectum prior to simulation and each treatment. A single reviewer delineated organs at risk (OARs) on the simulation (Sim-CT) and Cone Beam CTs (CBCT) for analyses. Results Bladder and rectum volume reductions were observed throughout the course of SBRT, with largest mean reductions of 86.9 mL (19.0%) for bladder and 6.4 mL (8.7%) for rectum noted at fraction #5 compared to Sim-CT (P < 0.01). Higher initial Sim-CT bladder volumes were predictive for greater reduction in absolute bladder volume during treatment (ρ = − 0.69; P < 0.01). Over the course of SBRT, there was a small but significant increase in bladder mean dose (+ 4.5 ± 12.8%; P < 0.01) but no significant change in the D2cc (+ 0.8 ± 4.0%; P = 0.28). The mean bladder trigone displacement was in the anterior direction (+ 4.02 ± 6.59 mm) with a corresponding decrease in mean trigone dose (− 3.6 ± 9.6%; P < 0.01) and D2cc (− 6.2 ± 15.6%; P < 0.01). There was a small but significant increase in mean rectal dose (+ 7.0 ± 12.9%, P < 0.01) but a decrease in rectal D2cc (− 2.2 ± 10.1%; P = 0.04). No significant correlations were found between relative bladder volume changes, bladder trigone displacements, or rectum volume changes with rates of genitourinary or rectal toxicities. Conclusions Despite smaller than expected bladder and rectal volumes at the time of treatment compared to the planning scans, dosimetric impact was minimal and not predictive of detrimental clinical outcomes. These results cast doubt on the need for excessively strict bladder filling and rectal emptying protocols in the context of image guided prostate SBRT and prospective studies are needed to determine its necessity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Byun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, 160 East 34th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel J Gorovets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Lauren M Jacobs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Laura Happersett
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pengpeng Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xin Pei
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah Burleson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margie Hunt
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Marisa A Kollmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ricco A, Barbera G, Lanciano R, Feng J, Hanlon A, Lozano A, Good M, Arrigo S, Lamond J, Yang J. Favorable Biochemical Freedom From Recurrence With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1505. [PMID: 33102201 PMCID: PMC7545336 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective(s): The current study reports long-term overall survival (OS) and biochemical freedom from recurrence (BFFR) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer in a single community hospital setting with early adoption. Materials/Methods: Ninety-seven consecutive men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer treated with SBRT between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively studied. Categorical variables for analysis included National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group, race, Gleason grade group, T stage, use of androgen deprivation therapy, and planning target volume dose. Continuous variables for analysis included pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), percent cores positive, age at diagnosis, PSA nadir, prostate volume, percent prostate that received 40 Gy, and minimum dose to 0.03 cc of prostate (Dmin). BFFR was assessed using the Phoenix nadir +2 definition. OS and BFFR were estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methodology with comparisons accomplished using log-rank statistics. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was accomplished with a backwards selection Cox proportional-hazards model with statistical significance taken at the p < 0.05 level. Results: Median FU is 78.4 months. Five- and ten-year OS KM estimates are 90.9 and 73.2%, respectively, with 19 deaths recorded. MVA reveals pretreatment PSA (p = 0.032), percent prostate 40 Gy (p = 0.003), and race (p = 0.031) were predictive of OS. Five- and nine-year BFFR KM estimates are 92.1 and 87.5%, respectively, with 10 biochemical failures recorded. MVA revealed PSA nadir (p < 0.001) was the only factor predictive of BFFR. Specifically, for every one-unit increase in PSA nadir, there was a 4.2-fold increased odds of biochemical failure (HR = 4.248). No significant differences in BFFR were found between favorable intermediate, unfavorable intermediate, and high-risk prostate cancer (p = 0.054) with 7-year KM estimates of 96.6, 81.0, and 85.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Favorable OS and BFFR can be expected after SBRT for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer with non-significant differences seen for BFFR between favorable intermediate, unfavorable intermediate, and high-risk groups. Our 5-year BFFR compares favorably with the HYPO-RT-PC trial of 84%. PSA nadir was predictive of biochemical failure. This study is ultimately limited by the small absolute number of high-risk patients included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Ricco
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Gabrielle Barbera
- College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Rachelle Lanciano
- Radiation Oncology, Crozer-Keystone Health System, Springfield, PA, United States
- Philadelphia CyberKnife Center, Havertown, PA, United States
| | - Jing Feng
- Philadelphia CyberKnife Center, Havertown, PA, United States
| | - Alexandra Hanlon
- Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Alicia Lozano
- Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Michael Good
- Philadelphia CyberKnife Center, Havertown, PA, United States
| | - Stephen Arrigo
- Radiation Oncology, Crozer-Keystone Health System, Springfield, PA, United States
- Philadelphia CyberKnife Center, Havertown, PA, United States
| | - John Lamond
- Radiation Oncology, Crozer-Keystone Health System, Springfield, PA, United States
- Philadelphia CyberKnife Center, Havertown, PA, United States
| | - Jun Yang
- Philadelphia CyberKnife Center, Havertown, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kim YJ, Yoon KJ, Kim YS. Simultaneous integrated boost with stereotactic radiotherapy for dominant intraprostatic lesion of localized prostate cancer: a dosimetric planning study. Sci Rep 2020; 10:14713. [PMID: 32895442 PMCID: PMC7477222 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71715-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) has been known as the most common local recurrence site of prostate cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to DIL with CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy (CK-SBRT). We selected 15 patients with prostate cancer and visible DIL and compared 3 plans for each patient: 1) No boost plan of 35 Gy to prostate, 2) DIL_40 plan of SIB 40 Gy to DIL and 35 Gy to prostate, and 3) DIL_45 plan with 45 Gy to DIL and 35 Gy to the prostate in 5 fractions. All targets satisfied with the prescription coverage per protocol. However, some patients failed to meet the Dmax of the rectum in DIL_40 plans (n = 4), and DIL_45 plans (n = 6). Violations of bladder constraints occurred in four DIL_45 plans. Consequently, the DIL boost with SBRT was possible in 73% of patients with DIL_40 plans, and 60% of patients with DIL_45 plans without any violation of normal organ constraints. All patients who experienced constraint violations had DILs in posterior segments. DIL boost using CK-SBRT could be an option for localized prostate cancer patients. For patients who had DIL in posterior segments, a moderate dose escalation of 40 Gy seemed appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Joo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoung Jun Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Seok Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Royce TJ, Mavroidis P, Wang K, Falchook AD, Sheets NC, Fuller DB, Collins SP, El Naqa I, Song DY, Ding GX, Nahum AE, Jackson A, Grimm J, Yorke E, Chen RC. Tumor Control Probability Modeling and Systematic Review of the Literature of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 110:227-236. [PMID: 32900561 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dose escalation improves localized prostate cancer disease control, and moderately hypofractionated external beam radiation is noninferior to conventional fractionation. The evolving treatment approach of ultrahypofractionation with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows possible further biological dose escalation (biologically equivalent dose [BED]) and shortened treatment time. METHODS AND MATERIALS The American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Biological Effects of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy/SBRT included a subgroup to study the prostate tumor control probability (TCP) with SBRT. We performed a systematic review of the available literature and created a dose-response TCP model for the endpoint of freedom from biochemical relapse. Results were stratified by prostate cancer risk group. RESULTS Twenty-five published cohorts were identified for inclusion, with a total of 4821 patients (2235 with low-risk, 1894 with intermediate-risk, and 446 with high-risk disease, when reported) treated with a variety of dose/fractionation schemes, permitting dose-response modeling. Five studies had a median follow-up of more than 5 years. Dosing regimens ranged from 32 to 50 Gy in 4 to 5 fractions, with total BED (α/β = 1.5 Gy) between 183.1 and 383.3 Gy. At 5 years, we found that in patients with low-intermediate risk disease, an equivalent doses of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) of 71 Gy (31.7 Gy in 5 fractions) achieved a TCP of 90% and an EQD2 of 90 Gy (36.1 Gy in 5 fractions) achieved a TCP of 95%. In patients with high-risk disease, an EQD2 of 97 Gy (37.6 Gy in 5 fractions) can achieve a TCP of 90% and an EQD2 of 102 Gy (38.7 Gy in 5 fractions) can achieve a TCP of 95%. CONCLUSIONS We found significant variation in the published literature on target delineation, margins used, dose/fractionation, and treatment schedule. Despite this variation, TCP was excellent. Most prescription doses range from 35 to 40 Gy, delivered in 4 to 5 fractions. The literature did not provide detailed dose-volume data, and our dosimetric analysis was constrained to prescription doses. There are many areas in need of continued research as SBRT continues to evolve as a treatment modality for prostate cancer, including the durability of local control with longer follow-up across risk groups, the efficacy and safety of SBRT as a boost to intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and the impact of incorporating novel imaging techniques into treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor J Royce
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Panayiotis Mavroidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kyle Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Nathan C Sheets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Donald B Fuller
- Division of Genesis Healthcare Partners Inc, Genesis CyberKnife, San Diego, California
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Machine Learning Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Daniel Y Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - George X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Alan E Nahum
- Department of Physics, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom and Henley-on-Thames, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - Jimm Grimm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Accelerating prostate stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy: Efficacy and toxicity of a randomized phase II study of 11 versus 29 days overall treatment time (PATRIOT). Radiother Oncol 2020; 149:8-13. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
44
|
Urethra-Sparing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Quality Assurance of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:1047-1054. [PMID: 32535161 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present the radiation therapy quality assurance results from a prospective multicenter phase 2 randomized trial of short versus protracted urethra-sparing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2012 and 2015, 165 patients with prostate cancer from 9 centers were randomized and treated with SBRT delivered either every other day (arm A, n = 82) or once a week (arm B, n = 83); 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions were prescribed to the prostate with (n = 92) or without (n = 73) inclusion of the seminal vesicles (SV), and the urethra planning-risk volume received 32.5 Gy. Patients were treated either with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; n = 112) or with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT; n = 53). Deviations from protocol dose constraints, planning target volume (PTV) homogeneity index, PTV Dice similarity coefficient, and number of monitor units for each treatment plan were retrospectively analyzed. Dosimetric results of VMAT versus IMRT and treatment plans with versus without inclusion of SV were compared. RESULTS At least 1 major protocol deviation occurred in 51 patients (31%), whereas none was observed in 41. Protocol violations were more frequent in the IMRT group (P < .001). Furthermore, the use of VMAT yielded better dosimetric results than IMRT for urethra planning-risk volume D98% (31.1 vs 30.8 Gy, P < .0001), PTV D2% (37.9 vs 38.7 Gy, P < .0001), homogeneity index (0.09 vs 0.10, P < .0001), Dice similarity coefficient (0.83 vs 0.80, P < .0001), and bladder wall V50% (24.5% vs 33.5%, P = .0001). To achieve its goals volumetric modulated arc therapy required fewer monitor units than IMRT (2275 vs 3378, P <.0001). The inclusion of SV in the PTV negatively affected the rectal wall V90% (9.1% vs 10.4%, P = .0003) and V80% (13.2% vs 15.7%, P = .0003). CONCLUSIONS Protocol deviations with potential impact on tumor control or toxicity occurred in 31% of patients in this prospective clinical trial. Protocol deviations were more frequent with IMRT. Prospective radiation therapy quality assurance protocols should be strongly recommended for SBRT trials to minimize potential protocol deviations.
Collapse
|
45
|
Primary endpoint analysis of the multicentre phase II hypo-FLAME trial for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147:92-98. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
46
|
Pan X, Levin-Epstein R, Huang J, Ruan D, King CR, Kishan AU, Steinberg ML, Qi XS. Dosimetric predictors of patient-reported toxicity after prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: Analysis of full range of the dose-volume histogram using ensemble machine learning. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148:181-188. [PMID: 32388444 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the associations between dosimetric parameters and patient-reported outcomes, and to identify latent dosimetric parameters that most correlate with acute and subacute patient-reported urinary and rectal toxicity after prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using machine learning methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-six patients who underwent prostate SBRT (40 Gy in 5 fractions) were included. Patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes were derived from bowel and bladder symptom scores on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) at 3 and 12 months post-SBRT. We utilized ensemble machine learning (ML) to interrogate the entire dose-volume histogram (DVH) to evaluate relationships between dose-volume parameters and HRQOL changes. The latent predictive dosimetric parameters that were most associated with HRQOL changes in urinary and rectal function were thus identified. An external cohort of 26 prostate SBRT patients was acquired to further test the predictive models. RESULTS Bladder dose-volume metrics strongly predicted patient-reported urinary irritative and incontinence symptoms (area under the curves [AUCs] of 0.79 and 0.87, respectively) at 12 months. Maximum bladder dose, bladder V102.5%, bladder volume, and conformity indices (V50/VPTV and V100/VPTV) were most predictive of HRQOL changes in both urinary domains. No strong rectal toxicity dosimetric association was identified (AUC = 0.64). CONCLUSION We demonstrated the application of advanced ML methods to identify a set of dosimetric variables that most highly correlated with patient-reported urinary HRQOL. DVH quantities identified with these methods may be used to achieve outcome-driven planning objectives to further reduce patient-reported toxicity with prostate SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoying Pan
- School of Computer Science and Technology, Xi'an University of Posts & Telecommunications, China; Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Network Data Analysis and Intelligent Processing, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Rebecca Levin-Epstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Jiahao Huang
- School of Computer Science and Technology, Xi'an University of Posts & Telecommunications, China
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Christopher R King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - X Sharon Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Heterogenous Dose-escalated Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for All Risk Prostate Cancer: Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes of an Institutional Pilot Study. Am J Clin Oncol 2020; 43:469-476. [PMID: 32349020 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Previous prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy studies delivered uniform doses of 35 to 40 Gy/5 fx. Attempts at uniform dose escalation to 50 Gy caused high rates of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. We hypothesize that heterogeneous dose escalation to regions nonadjacent to sensitive structures (urethra, rectum, and bladder) is safe and efficacious. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were enrolled on a prospective pilot study. The primary endpoint was treatment-related GI and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. The secondary endpoints included quality of life (QOL) assessed by the EPIC-26 questionnaire and biochemical control. The target volume received 36.25 Gy/5 fx. The target >3 mm from sensitive was dose escalated to 50 Gy/5 fx. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Three patients had low, 14 intermediate, and 18 high-risk disease. The mean initial prostate specific antigen was 15.1 ng/mL. Androgen deprivation therapy was given to 19 patients. Median follow-up was 46 months. Urinary irritation/obstructive and urinary bother scores declined by minimal clinically important difference threshold from baseline at 6 weeks, but subsequently recovered by 4 months. No differences in QOL scores were observed for urinary incontinence, bowel domain, bloody stools, or sexual domain. One patient developed acute grade 4 GU toxicity and acute grade 4 GI toxicity. The incidence of late high grade toxicity was 1/35 for GU toxicity and 2/35 for GI toxicity. Freedom from biochemical failure at 3 years was 88.0%. CONCLUSIONS Heterogeneous dose-escalated prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy is feasible with low rates of acute and late toxicities and favorable QOL outcomes in patients with predominantly intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
48
|
Levin-Epstein R, Qiao-Guan G, Juarez JE, Shen Z, Steinberg ML, Ruan D, Valle L, Nickols NG, Kupelian PA, King CR, Cao M, Kishan AU. Clinical Assessment of Prostate Displacement and Planning Target Volume Margins for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:539. [PMID: 32373529 PMCID: PMC7177009 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the optimal planning target volume (PTV) margins for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of prostate cancer based on inter- and intra-fractional prostate motion determined from daily image guidance. Methods and Materials: Two hundred and five patients who were enrolled on two prospective studies of SBRT (8 Gy × 5 fractions) for localized prostate cancer treated at a single institution between 2012 and 2017 had complete inter- and intra-fractional shift data available. All patients had scheduled kilovoltage planar imaging during SBRT with rigid registration to intraprostatic fiducials prior to each of four half-arcs delivered per fraction, as well as cone beam CT verification of anatomy prior to each fraction. Inter- and intra- fractional shift data were obtained to estimate the required PTV margins based on the classic van Herk formula. Inter- and intra-fractional motion were compared between patients with and without severe toxicities using the independent two-sample Wilcoxon test. Results: The margins required to account for inter-fractional motion were estimated to be 0.99, 1.52, and 1.45 cm in lateral (LR), longitudinal (SI), and vertical (AP) directions, respectively. The margins required to account for intra-fractional motion were estimated to be 0.19, 0.27, and 0.31 cm in LR, SI and AP directions, respectively. Large intra-fractional shifts were mostly observed in the SI and AP directions, with 2.0 and 5.4% of patients experiencing average intra-fractional motion >3 mm in the SI and AP directions, respectively, compared with none experiencing mean shifts >3 mm in the LR direction. Six patients experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity. There were no significant differences in mean inter- or intra-fractional motion in any of the cardinal directions compared to patients without severe toxicity (inter-fractional p = 0.46-0.99, intra-fractional p = 0.10-0.84). Conclusion: The inter- and intra-fractional margins estimated from this study are in line with prior reported values. Intra-fractional prostate motion was generally small with larger margins required for the SI and AP directions, notably just slightly exceeding the commonly used 3 mm posterior PTV margin even with realignment between half-arcs. Development of severe toxicity was not significantly associated with the degree of inter- or intra-fractional motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Levin-Epstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - George Qiao-Guan
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Jesus E. Juarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Zhouhuizi Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Michael L. Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Luca Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Nicholas G. Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Patrick A. Kupelian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Christopher R. King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Amar U. Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Albuquerque K, Tumati V, Lea J, Ahn C, Richardson D, Miller D, Timmerman R. A Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy as a Boost for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:464-471. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
50
|
Alayed Y, Davidson M, Liu S, Chu W, Tseng E, Cheung P, Vesprini D, Cheung H, Morton G, Musunuru HB, Ravi A, Korol R, Deabreu A, Ho L, Commisso K, Bhounr Z, D'Alimonte L, Mittmann N, Dragomir A, Zhang L, Loblaw A. Evaluating the Tolerability of a Simultaneous Focal Boost to the Gross Tumor in Prostate SABR: A Toxicity and Quality-of-Life Comparison of Two Prospective Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:136-142. [PMID: 31987962 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Revised: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dose-escalated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to the whole prostate may be associated with better outcomes but has a risk of increased toxicity. An alternative approach is to focally boost the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) seen on magnetic resonance imaging. We report the toxicity and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes of 2 phase 2 trials of prostate and pelvic SABR, with or without a simultaneous DIL boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS The first trial treated patients with high-risk prostate cancer to a dose of 40 Gy to the prostate and 25 Gy to the pelvis in 5 fractions. The second trial treated patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer to a dose of 35 Gy to the prostate, 25 Gy to the pelvis, and a DIL boost up to 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Acute toxicities, late toxicities, and QOL were assessed. RESULTS Thirty patients were enrolled in each trial. In the focal boost cohort, the median DIL D90% was 48.3 Gy. There was no significant difference in acute grade ≥2 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity between the 2 trials or in cumulative worst late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity up to 24 months. There was no significant difference in QOL domain scores or minimally clinical important change between the 2 trials. CONCLUSIONS Prostate and pelvic SABR with a simultaneous DIL boost was feasible. Acute grade ≥2 toxicity, late toxicity, and QOL seemed to be comparable to a cohort that did not receive a focal boost. Further follow-up will be required to assess long-term outcomes, and randomized data are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasir Alayed
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stanley Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Tseng
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hans Cheung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - H B Musunuru
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anath Ravi
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Renee Korol
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Deabreu
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ling Ho
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristina Commisso
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zeeba Bhounr
- Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Program, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura D'Alimonte
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicole Mittmann
- Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alice Dragomir
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Liang Zhang
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|