1
|
Dubinsky P, Vojtek V, Belanova K, Janickova N, Balazova N, Tomkova Z. Hypofractionated Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy in 16 Fractions: A Single-Institution Outcome. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1610. [PMID: 37511985 PMCID: PMC10381816 DOI: 10.3390/life13071610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal hypofractionated schedule of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy remains to be established. We evaluated treatment outcomes and toxicity of moderately hypofractionated post-prostatectomy radiotherapy in 16 daily fractions delivered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The treatment schedule selection was motivated by limited technology resources and was radiobiologically dose-escalated. METHODS One hundred consecutive M0 patients with post-prostatectomy radiotherapy were evaluated. Radiotherapy indication was adjuvant (ART) in 19%, early-salvage (eSRT) in 46% and salvage (SRT) in 35%. The dose prescription for prostate bed planning target volume was 52.8 Gy in 16 fractions of 3.3 Gy. The Common Terminology Criteria v. 4 for Adverse Events scale was used for toxicity grading. RESULTS The median follow-up was 61 months. Five-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) was 78.6%, distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) was 95.7% and overall survival was 98.8%. Treatment indication (ART or eSRT vs. SRT) was the only significant factor for bRFS (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.47, p = 0.001) and DMFS (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.90; p = 0.038). Acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity grade 2 was recorded in 24%, grade 3 in 2%, acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity grade 2 in 10% of patients, and no grade 3. A cumulative rate of late GI toxicity grade ≥ 2 was observed in 9% and late GU toxicity grade ≥ 2 in 16% of patients. CONCLUSIONS The observed results confirmed efficacy and showed a higher than anticipated rate of early GI, late GI, and GU toxicity of post-prostatectomy radiobiologically dose-escalated hypofractionated radiotherapy in 16 daily fractions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavol Dubinsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, East Slovakia Institute of Oncology, 041 91 Kosice, Slovakia
- Faculty of Health, Catholic University in Ruzomberok, 034 01 Ruzomberok, Slovakia
| | - Vladimir Vojtek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, East Slovakia Institute of Oncology, 041 91 Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Katarina Belanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, East Slovakia Institute of Oncology, 041 91 Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Natalia Janickova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, East Slovakia Institute of Oncology, 041 91 Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Noemi Balazova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, East Slovakia Institute of Oncology, 041 91 Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Zuzana Tomkova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, East Slovakia Institute of Oncology, 041 91 Kosice, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ozyigit G, Onal C, Beduk Esen CS, Tilki B, Hurmuz P. Treatment outcomes of postoperative ultra-hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:252.e1-252.e8. [PMID: 36631368 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultra-hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to prostate bed. METHODS Sixty-six prostate cancer patients treated with postoperative ultra-hypofractionated SBRT between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received a total dose of 35 Gy to prostate bed in 5 fractions. Biochemical complete response (BCR), biochemical failure (BF), acute and late toxicities were assessed. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 24.2 months (range, 6.4-37.2), seven patients (10.6%) developed BF, and the 2-year freedom from BF (FFBF) rate was 88.4%. BCR was observed in 57 patients (86.4%). The 2-year FFBF in patients with pre-SBRT PSA value of <0.2 ng/mL was higher than those with pre-SBRT PSA of ≥0.2 ng/mL (100% vs. 81.4%; P = 0.04). The 2-year FFBF in patients with BCR was significantly higher than in those without BCR (94.5% vs. 58.3%; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, pre-SBRT PSA and post-SBRT PSA values were prognostic factors for FFBF (P = 0.009 and P = 0.01, respectively). Nine patients (13.6 %) developed acute and late grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicities. There was no acute or late grade ≥3 GU toxicity. Acute and late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was observed in 9 (13.6%) and 2 (3%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION Postoperative ultra-fractionated SBRT showed no severe acute toxicity and late toxicity rates of about 15%, in addition to excellent biochemical control rates. Pre- and post-SBRT PSA levels may be a predictor of BCR in patients receiving post-operative ultra-fractionated SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gokhan Ozyigit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Cem Onal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey; Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Burak Tilki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pervin Hurmuz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma TM, Ballas LK, Wilhalme H, Sachdeva A, Chong N, Sharma S, Yang T, Basehart V, Reiter RE, Saigal C, Chamie K, Litwin MS, Rettig MB, Nickols NG, Yoon SM, Smith L, Gao Y, Steinberg ML, Cao M, Kishan AU. Quality-of-Life Outcomes and Toxicity Profile Among Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation: The SCIMITAR Multicenter Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:142-152. [PMID: 36007724 PMCID: PMC11386273 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is an underused standard-of-care intervention for patients with prostate cancer and recurrence/adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy. Although stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is a well-studied and convenient option for definitive treatment, data on the postprostatectomy setting are extremely limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short-term physician-scored genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities and patient-reported outcomes after postprostatectomy SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS The SCIMITAR trial was a phase 2, dual-center, open-label, single-arm trial that enrolled patients with postoperative prostate-specific antigen >0.03 ng/mL or adverse pathologic features. Coprimary endpoints were 4-year biochemical recurrence-free survival, physician-scored acute and late GU and GI toxicities by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03) scale, and patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes, as represented by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 and the International Prostate Symptom Score. Patients received SBRT 30 to 34 Gy/5 fractions to the prostate bed ± bed boost ± pelvic nodes with computed tomography (CTgRT) or magnetic resonance imaging guidance (MRgRT) in a nonrandomized fashion. Physician-scored toxicities and patient-reported QOL outcomes were collected at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of toxicities and QOL outcomes. RESULTS One hundred participants were enrolled (CTgRT, n = 69; MRgRT, n = 31). The median follow-up was 29.5 months (CTgRT: 33.3 months, MRgRT: 22.6 months). The median (range) prostate bed dose was 32 (30-34) Gy. Acute and late grade 2 GU toxicities were both 9% while acute and late grade 2 GI toxicities were 5% and 0%, respectively. Three patients had grade 3 toxicity (n = 1 GU, n = 2 GI). No patient receiving MRgRT had grade 3 GU or grade ≥2 GI toxicity. Compared with CTgRT, MRgRT was associated with a 30.5% (95% confidence interval, 11.6%-49.5%) reduction in any-grade acute GI toxicity (P = .006). MRgRT was independently associated with improved any-grade GI toxicity and improved bowel QOL. CONCLUSIONS Postprostatectomy SBRT was well tolerated at short-term follow-up. MRgRT may decrease GI toxicity. Longer toxicity and/or efficacy follow-up and randomized studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Leslie K Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Holly Wilhalme
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research
| | - Ankush Sachdeva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Natalie Chong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sahil Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tiffany Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Vincent Basehart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | - Mark S Litwin
- Department of Urology; Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health; School of Nursing
| | - Matthew B Rettig
- Department of Urology; Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nicholas G Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stephanie M Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lauren Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Urology.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laughlin BS, Voss MM, Toesca DA, Daniels T, Golafshar MA, Keole SR, Wong WW, Rwigema JC, Davis B, Schild SE, Stish BJ, Choo R, Lester S, DeWees TA, Vargas CE. Preliminary Analysis of a Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer With High-Risk Features After Radical Prostatectomy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101143. [PMID: 36845611 PMCID: PMC9943785 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There are limited data regarding using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the postprostatectomy setting. Here, we present a preliminary analysis of a prospective phase II trial that aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of postprostatectomy SBRT for adjuvant or early salvage therapy. Materials and Methods Between May 2018 and May 2020, 41 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and were stratified into 3 groups: group I (adjuvant), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 0.2 ng/mL with high-risk features including positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, or extracapsular extension; group II (salvage), with PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL but < 2 ng/mL; or group III (oligometastatic), with PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL but < 2 ng/mL and up to 3 sites of nodal or bone metastases. Androgen deprivation therapy was not offered to group I. Androgen deprivation therapy was offered for 6 months for group II and 18 months for group III patients. SBRT dose to the prostate bed was 30 to 32 Gy in 5 fractions. Baseline-adjusted physician reported toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events), patient reported quality-of-life (Expanded Prostate Index Composite, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System), and American Urologic Association scores were evaluated for all patients. Results The median follow-up was 23 months (range, 10-37). SBRT was adjuvant in 8 (20%) patients, salvage in 28 (68%), and salvage with the presence of oligometastases in 5 (12%) patients. Urinary, bowel, and sexual quality of life domains remained high after SBRT. Patients tolerated SBRT with no grade 3 or higher (3+) gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities. The baseline adjusted acute and late toxicity grade 2 genitourinary (urinary incontinence) rate was 2.4% (1/41) and 12.2% (5/41). At 2 years, clinical disease control was 95%, and biochemical control was 73%. Among the 2 clinical failures, 1 was a regional node and the other a bone metastasis. Oligometastatic sites were salvaged successfully with SBRT. There were no in-target failures. Conclusions Postprostatectomy SBRT was very well tolerated in this prospective cohort, with no significant effect on quality of life metrics postirradiation, while providing excellent clinical disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Molly M. Voss
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Thomas Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona,Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, Brooklyn, New York
| | | | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Brian Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Brad J. Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Scott Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Carlos E. Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona,Corresponding author: Carlos E. Vargas, MD
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moll M, D'Andrea D, Zaharie A, Grubmüller B, Paschen C, Zehetmayer S, Shariat SF, Widder J, Goldner G. Comparative effectiveness of moderate hypofractionation with volumetric modulated arc therapy versus conventional 3D-radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:719-726. [PMID: 35284951 PMCID: PMC9300528 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01909-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer is well established for definitive treatment, but not well defined in the postoperative setting. The purpose of this analysis was to assess oncologic outcomes and toxicity in a large cohort of patients treated with conventionally fractionated three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy (CF) and hypofractionated volumetric modulated arc therapy (HF) after radical prostatectomy. METHODS Between 1994 and 2019, a total of 855 patients with prostate carcinoma were treated by postoperative radiotherapy using CF (total dose 65-72 Gy, single fraction 1.8-2 Gy) in 572 patients and HF (total dose 62.5-63.75 Gy, single fraction 2.5-2.55 Gy) in 283 patients. The association of treatment modality with biochemical control, overall survival (OS), and gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was assessed using logistic and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS There was no difference between the two modalities regarding biochemical control rates (77% versus 81%, respectively, for HF and CF at 24 months and 58% and 64% at 60 months; p = 0.20). OS estimates after 5 years: 95% versus 93% (p = 0.72). Patients undergoing HF had less frequent grade 2 or higher acute GI or GU side effects (p = 0.03 and p = 0.005, respectively). There were no differences in late GI side effects between modalities (hazard ratio 0.99). Median follow-up was 23 months for HF and 72 months for CF (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION For radiation therapy of resected prostate cancer, our analysis of this largest single-centre cohort (n = 283) treated with hypofractionation with advanced treatment techniques compared with conventional fractionation did not yield different outcomes in terms of biochemical control and toxicities. Prospective investigating of HF is merited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Moll
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandru Zaharie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bernhard Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christopher Paschen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sonja Zehetmayer
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Section for Medical Statistics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregor Goldner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nicosia L, Mazzola R, Vitale C, Cuccia F, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Ruggeri R, Cavalleri S, Alongi F. Postoperative moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a mono-institutional propensity-score-matching analysis between adjuvant and early-salvage radiotherapy. Radiol Med 2022; 127:560-570. [PMID: 35347581 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01479-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the impact of moderately hypofractionated postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS The data of 304 surgically resected PCa patients were analyzed. One hundred and five patients underwent adjuvant RT (aRT), 77 early-savage RT (esRT), and 123 salvage RT (sRT). Biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for potential confounders between aRT and esRT groups. RESULTS The median follow-up was 33 months. Three-year BRFS and PFS were 82 and 85.2%, respectively, in the overall population. At the multivariate analysis, Gleason score and hormone therapy were factors independently correlated with BRFS and PFS. After PSM, there was no difference in BRFS and PFS between aRT and esRT patients. Severe toxicity was represented by grade 3 urinary incontinence (3.5%) and urgency (1%), and aRT correlated with increased any-grade acute toxicity. Severe grade 3 gastrointestinal late toxicity occurred in 1.3% of cases. CONCLUSION Postoperative moderately hypofractionated RT achieved acceptable disease control rate and demonstrated no increased or unexpected toxicity. Future prospective studies should evaluate the role of postoperative RT in patients with unfavorable disease characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Vitale
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Ruggiero Ruggeri
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Cavalleri
- Urology Division, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schröder C, Tang H, Windisch P, Zwahlen DR, Buchali A, Vu E, Bostel T, Sprave T, Zilli T, Murthy V, Förster R. Stereotactic Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Prostate Cancer in the Adjuvant or Salvage Setting: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030696. [PMID: 35158961 PMCID: PMC8833497 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Stereotactic body radiotherapy, a type of high-precision radiotherapy delivering high doses within few treatment sessions has proven to be effective and well tolerated in prostate cancer patients treated with definite radiotherapy. This systematic review summarizes the available data and analyzes whether this modern treatment may routinely be offered to prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. Abstract (1) Background: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men and can be treated with radical prostatectomy (RPE) or radiotherapy in the primary setting. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) has proven to be effective and well tolerated in this setting. However, if SBRT is an equally promising treatment option if applied in the adjuvant or salvage setting after RPE remains unknown. (2) Methods: We searched the PubMed and Embase databases with the following full-text queries in August 2021 for any combination of the terms “SBRT”, “prostate”, “adjuvant”, “postoperative”, “salvage”, “stereotactic radiotherapy”, “prostate bed”. There were no limitations regarding publication date or language. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. (3) Results: We identified 11 individual studies that were included in this systematic review. Three publications included patients without prior radiotherapy and the remaining eight patients with prior radiotherapy. In all but two publications the radiation target was the macroscopic recurrence. SBRT was overall well tolerated with acceptable rates of acute and late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity. Quality of life was published for two phase I trials with good results. There was a very heterogeneous reporting on biochemical control after SBRT. (4) Conclusions: At this point, ultra-hypofractionated RT using SBRT to the prostate bed remains experimental and its use should be restricted to clinical trials. Given the biological rationale for extreme hypofractionation in patients with prostate cancer and the acceptable toxicity rates that have been reported, further exploration of this field is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Schröder
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland; (C.S.); (H.T.); (P.W.); (D.R.Z.)
| | - Hongjian Tang
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland; (C.S.); (H.T.); (P.W.); (D.R.Z.)
| | - Paul Windisch
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland; (C.S.); (H.T.); (P.W.); (D.R.Z.)
| | - Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland; (C.S.); (H.T.); (P.W.); (D.R.Z.)
| | - André Buchali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), 16816 Neuruppin, Germany;
| | - Erwin Vu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen (KSSG), 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland;
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany;
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Geneva (HUG), 1205 Geneva, Switzerland;
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai 400012, India;
| | - Robert Förster
- Institute for Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur (KSW), 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland; (C.S.); (H.T.); (P.W.); (D.R.Z.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +41-52-266-31-40
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park G, Kim YJ, Ahn H, Park W, Lee JS, Kim YS. Salvage hypofractionated accelerated versus standard radiotherapy for the treatment of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (SHARE): the protocol of a prospective, randomized, open-label, superiority, multi-institutional trial. Trials 2021; 22:728. [PMID: 34674739 PMCID: PMC8532339 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05708-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While several phase III trials have investigated the role of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer, prospective data reporting the outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment setting are sparse. Therefore, this study is designed to assess the efficacy and treatment-related toxicity of hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of biochemical recurrence in men who underwent radical prostatectomy. The primary objective of this trial is to investigate whether hypofractionated radiotherapy improves biochemical control compared with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. In addition, treatment-related toxicity, quality of life, and survival will be evaluated as secondary endpoints. METHODS In this prospective, randomized, multi-institutional trial (the SHARE study), patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer will be randomized to receive either hypofractionated radiotherapy (65 Gy in 2.5-Gy fractions) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (66 Gy in 2-Gy fractions). Prostate bed irradiation or elective pelvic nodal irradiation including the prostate bed will be performed using intensity-modulated radiotherapy and daily image guidance. Treatment efficacy will be assessed using the serum tumor marker prostate-specific antigen, and toxicity will be evaluated through both physician- and patient-reported outcomes. Quality of life will also be investigated. DISCUSSION This study is designed to demonstrate whether hypofractionated radiotherapy is beneficial in terms of biochemical control and toxicity compared with standard salvage radiotherapy. If hypofractionated radiotherapy is shown to be superior to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, it will mean that improved biochemical control can be achieved, accompanied by greater patient convenience and more efficient use of medical resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03920033. Registered on 18 April 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geumju Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Joo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Hanjong Ahn
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Sung Lee
- Clinical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Seok Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wages NA, Sanders JC, Smith A, Wood S, Anscher MS, Varhegyi N, Krupski TL, Harris TJ, Showalter TN. Hypofractionated Postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer to Reduce Toxicity and Improve Patient Convenience: A Phase 1/2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:1254-1262. [PMID: 33227441 PMCID: PMC7965239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The phase 1 portion of this multicenter, phase 1/2 study of hypofractionated (HypoFx) prostate bed radiation therapy (RT) as salvage or adjuvant therapy aimed to identify the shortest dose-fractionation schedule with acceptable toxicity. The phase 2 portion aimed to assess the health-related quality of life (QoL) of using this HypoFx regimen. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligibility included standard adjuvant or salvage prostate bed RT indications. Patients were assigned to receive 1 of 3 daily RT schedules: 56.6 Gy in 20 Fx, 50.4 Gy in 15 Fx, or 42.6 Gy in 10 Fx. Regional nodal irradiation and androgen deprivation therapy were not allowed. Participants were followed for 2 years after treatment with outcome measures based on prostate-specific antigen levels, toxicity assessments (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v4.0), QoL measures (the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC] and EuroQol EQ-5D instruments), and out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS There were 32 evaluable participants, and median follow-up was 3.53 years. The shortest dose-fractionation schedule with acceptable toxicity was determined to be 42.6 Gy in 10 Fx, with most patients (23) treated with this schedule. Grade 3 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities occurred in 3 patients and 1 patient, respectively. There was 1 grade 4 sepsis event. Higher dose to the hottest 25% of the rectum was associated with increased risk of grade 2+ GI toxicity; no dosimetric factors were found to predict for GU toxicity. There was a significant decrease in the mean bowel, but not bladder, QoL score at 1 year compared with baseline. Prostate-specific antigen failure occurred in 34.3% of participants, using a definition of nadir plus 2 ng/mL. Metastases were more likely to occur in regional lymph nodes (5 of 7) than in bones (2 of 7). The mean out-of-pocket cost for patients during treatment was $223.90. CONCLUSIONS We identified 42.6 Gy in 10 fractions as the shortest dose-fractionation schedule with acceptable toxicity in this phase 1/2 study. There was a higher than expected rate of grade 2 to 3 GU and GI toxicity and a decreased EPIC bowel QoL domain with this regimen. Future studies are needed to explore alternative adjuvant/salvage HypoFx RT schedules after radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nolan A Wages
- Division of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| | - Jason C Sanders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Amy Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Songserea Wood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Mitchell S Anscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Nikole Varhegyi
- Division of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Tracey L Krupski
- Department of Urology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Timothy J Harris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Valero J, Montero A, Hernando O, Izquierdo M, Sánchez E, García-Aranda M, López M, Ciérvide R, Martí J, Álvarez B, Alonso R, Chen-Zhao X, Fernández-Letón P, Rubio C. Moderate hypofractionated post-prostatectomy radiation therapy is feasible and well tolerated: experience from a single tertiary cancer centre. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:1452-1462. [PMID: 33433839 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02543-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Conventional post-prostatectomy radiation therapy comprises 6.5-8 weeks of treatment, therefore, hypofractionated and shortened schemes arouse increasing interest. We describe our experience regarding feasibility and clinical outcome of a post-prostatectomy moderate hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy schedule MATERIALS AND METHODS: From Oct 2015-Mar 2020, 113 patients, median age of 62 years-old (range 45-76) and prostate adenocarcinoma of low risk (30%), intermediate risk (49%) and high risk (21%) were included for adjuvant (34%) or salvage radiation therapy (66%) after radical prostatectomy (RP). All patients underwent radiotherapy with image-guided IMRT/VMAT to a total dose of 62.5 Gy in 2.5 Gy/fraction in 25 fractions. Sixteen patients (14%) received concomitant androgen deprivation therapy. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 29 months (range 3-60 months) all patients but three are alive. Eleven patients (10%) developed exclusive biochemical relapse while 19 patients (17%) presented macroscopically visible relapse: prostatectomy bed in two patients (2%), pelvic lymph nodes in 13 patients (11.5%) and distant metastases in four patients (4%). The 3 years actuarial rates for OS, bFRS, and DMFS were 99.1, 91.1 and 91.2%, respectively. Acute and late tolerance was satisfactory. Maximal acute genitourinary (AGU) toxicity was G2 in 8% of patients; maximal acute gastrointestinal (AGI) toxicity was G2 in 3.5% of patients; maximal late genitourinary (LGU) toxicity was G3 in 1% of patients and maximal late gastrointestinal (LGI) toxicity was G2 in 2% of patients. There were no cases of severe acute or late toxicity. No relationship was found between acute or late GI/GU adverse effects and dosimetric parameters, age, presence of comorbidities or concomitant treatments. CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated radiotherapy (62.5 Gy in 25 2.5 Gy fractions) is feasible and well tolerated with low complication rates allowing for a moderate dose-escalation that offers encouraging clinical results for biochemical control and survival in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Valero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain.
| | - O Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Izquierdo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - M García-Aranda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - M López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Ciérvide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Martí
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Álvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - X Chen-Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - C Rubio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy to the Prostate Bed With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT): A Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1263-1270. [PMID: 33346091 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is a common therapy used for patients with prostate cancer. Although clinical trials have established the safety and efficacy of hypofractionation as a primary therapy, there are limited data in a postoperative setting. We conducted a prospective trial to evaluate the safety and feasibility of postoperative hypofractionated RT to the prostate bed. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this phase 2 trial, patients submitted to radical prostatectomy were treated with hypofractionated RT to the prostate bed (adjuvant or salvage). The prescribed dose was 51 Gy in 15 fractions (3.4 Gy per fraction), using intensity modulated and image guided radiation therapy techniques. The primary endpoint was the rate of acute genitourinary (GU) grade ≥2 toxicity. Secondary endpoints included acute gastrointestinal (GI) and late GU/GI toxicities, biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS Of 64 enrolled patients, 61 received radiation therapy (57 salvage and 4 adjuvant radiation therapy). After a median follow-up of 16 months, 11.5% of patients experienced acute grade ≥2 GU symptoms and 13.1% experienced acute grade ≥2 GI symptoms. The late grade ≥2 GU toxicity rate was 8.2%, and 1 patient (1.6%) developed both acute and late grade 3 GU toxicity. The late grade ≥2 GI toxicity rate was 11.5%, and no grade 3 GI adverse events were reported. The short follow-up limits our ability to perform a robust oncologic endpoint assessment; however, the 2-year BFFS, use of subsequent salvage therapy, and the development of metastasis were 95.1%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated RT to the prostate bed in 15 treatments was safe, with an acceptable GU and GI toxicity profile. Further study in large, randomized trials is warranted.
Collapse
|
12
|
Braide K, Kindblom J, Lindencrona U, Månsson M, Hugosson J. A comparison of side-effects and quality-of-life in patients operated on for prostate cancer with and without salvage radiation therapy. Scand J Urol 2020; 54:393-400. [PMID: 32619133 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1782980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The extent of late side-effects in prostate cancer patients, after radical prostatectomy (RP = reference group) and salvage radiation therapy (SRT) in a self-reporting perspective (PROM) is still under-reported. We aimed to investigate the rate and severity of side-effects and quality-of-life (QoL) according to PROM. METHODS AND MATERIALS A PROM survey was administered to a cohort of SRT patients matched to a reference group with median follow-up 10 years after surgery. In total, 740 patients were analyzed. To investigate the association between SRT versus reference group regarding side-effects and QoL, a Poisson regression analysis was conducted and presented as relative risk estimates (RR) together with 95% confidence intervals regarding questions related to urinary, rectal, sexual symptoms and QoL. RESULTS RRs ranged from of 1.7-6.5 on rectal symptoms and 1.2-1.4 for urinary symptoms. In general health, QoL and sexual function all RRs were below 1.1. With increasing age, higher RRs were seen for urinary leakage and lowered sexual function whereas longer time following irradiation showed higher RRs for rectal symptoms and rectal leakage. Limitations of this study include the cross-sectional design and lack of baseline assessment. CONCLUSIONS Adding SRT to RP does not seem to result in other than acceptable side-effects in the majority of men receiving SRT when taking a long follow-up time (median 10 years after surgery) into account. However, a subset of men develop severe side-effects where rectal bleeding dominates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Braide
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jon Kindblom
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Lindencrona
- Department of Radiation Physics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marianne Månsson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jonas Hugosson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yoon S, Cao M, Aghdam N, Shabsovich D, Kahlon S, Ballas L, Collins S, Steinberg ML, Kishan AU. Prostate bed and organ-at-risk deformation: Prospective volumetric and dosimetric data from a phase II trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148:44-50. [PMID: 32311600 PMCID: PMC11288625 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the post-prostatectomy setting is investigational. A major concern is the deformable prostate bed clinical target volume (CTV) and the closely juxtaposed organs-at-risk (OARs). We report a volumetric and dosimetric analysis of kilovoltage cone-beam CT (CBCT) data from the first 18 patients enrolled on a phase II trial of post-prostatectomy SBRT. With instructions on bladder filling and rectal preparation, we hypothesized acceptable CTV coverage while minimal overdosing to OARs could be achieved. METHODS All patients received 5 fractions of 6-6.8 Gy to the prostate bed. CBCT were taken prior to and halfway through each fraction. CTV and OARs were contoured for each CBCT. Changes in inter- and intra-fraction volume and dose were calculated. Relative changes in CTV V95%, bladder V32.5 Gy, and rectal V32.5 Gy and V27.5 Gy were evaluated. RESULTS Interfraction CTV volume remained stable, with median change +5.69% (IQR -1.73% to +9.84%). CTV V95% exhibited median change -0.74% (IQR -9.15% to -0.07%). Volumetric and dosimetric changes were minor from interfraction rotation and intrafraction motion. CTV V95% was ≥93% in 13 of 18 (72%) patients; in the remaining five, median change was -14.09% (IQR -16.64% to -13.56%). Interfraction CTV volume change was significantly larger among patients with CTV V95% <93% (+25.04% vs. +2.85%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS With specific bladder and rectum filling protocols, CTV underdosing and overdosing to bladder and rectum are avoided in majority of patients. Changes in CTV shape may account for the underdosing that may be observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, United States
| | - David Shabsovich
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, United States
| | - Sartajdeep Kahlon
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, United States
| | - Leslie Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Sean Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, United States
| | - Michael Lee Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Koerber SA, Katayama S, Sander A, Jaekel C, Haefner MF, Debus J, Herfarth K. Prostate bed irradiation with alternative radio-oncological approaches (PAROS) - a prospective, multicenter and randomized phase III trial. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:122. [PMID: 31291969 PMCID: PMC6617634 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1325-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background For patients with treatment-naïve carcinoma of the prostate, hypofractionated irradiation becomes more and more popular. Due to the low α/β value of prostate cancer, increased single dose leading to a shortened treatment period seems to be safe and feasible. However, reliable data is lacking for post-prostatectomy patients so far. Further, the role of proton therapy is still under debate. Two prospective phase II trials with both, hypofractionated photon and proton therapy, provided promising results. Methods/ design The PAROS trial is a prospective, multicenter and randomized phase III trial for men with localized prostate carcinoma after surgery. Post-prostatectomy patients will be randomized to either normofractionated radiotherapy (nRT) with photons (70.0/ 2.0 Gy), or hypofractionated radiotherapy (hRT) with photons (57.0/ 3.0 Gy) or hRT with protons (57.0/ 3.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE]). Block randomization is stratified by Gleason Score (≤ 7 vs. > 7) and treatment indication (adjuvant vs. salvage). The trial is planned to enroll 897 patients. The primary objective is to show an improvement in the bowel-score according to EORTC QLQ-PR25 after proton therapy compared to photon irradiation (week 12 vs. baseline). Secondary aims are non-inferiority of hRT compared to nRT with regard to biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life and toxicity. Discussion The present study aims to evaluate the role of hypofractionated radiotherapy to the prostate bed with photons and protons leading to significant impact on future management of operated men with prostate cancer. Trial registration Deutsches Register klinischer Studien: DRKS00015231; registered 27 September 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Sander
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Jaekel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Travel Distance as a Barrier to Receipt of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 41:953-959. [PMID: 29045266 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Following radical prostatectomy (RP), adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) decreases biochemical recurrence and potentially improves metastasis-free and overall survival for patients with high-risk pathologic features. Since adjuvant RT typically occurs daily over several weeks, the logistical challenges of extensive traveling may be a significant barrier to its use. We examined the association between distance to treatment facility and use of adjuvant RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 97,568 patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2004 through 2011 with cT1-4N0-xM0-x prostate cancer and found to have high-risk pathologic features (pT3-4 stage and/or positive surgical margins) at RP. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for sociodemographic and clinicopathologic factors was used to examine the association between travel distance and receipt of adjuvant RT, defined as radiotherapy initiated within 12 months after RP. RESULTS Overall, 10.6% (10,346) of the study cohort received adjuvant RT. On multivariable analysis, increasing travel distance was significantly associated with decreased use of adjuvant RT, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.0 (reference), 0.67, 0.46, 0.39, and 0.32 (all P<0.001) and prevalence of use at 12.6%, 8.8%, 6.3%, 4.9%, and 3.7% for patients living ≤25.0, 25.1 to 50.0, 50.1 to 75.0, 75.1 to 100.0, and >100.0 miles away, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Increasing travel distance was strongly associated with decreased use of adjuvant RT in this national cohort of postprostatectomy patients with high-risk pathologic features. These results strongly suggest that the logistical challenges of extensive travel are a significant barrier to the use of adjuvant RT. Efforts aimed at improving access to radiotherapy and reducing treatment time are urgently needed.
Collapse
|
16
|
Ballas LK, Luo C, Chung E, Kishan AU, Shuryak I, Quinn DI, Dorff T, Jhimlee S, Chiu R, Abreu A, Jennelle R, Aron M, Groshen S. Phase 1 Trial of SBRT to the Prostate Fossa After Prostatectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 104:50-60. [PMID: 30605751 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary objective was to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (within 10 weeks after treatment) associated with increasing hypofractionation to the prostate fossa (PF). We hypothesized that escalating the dose per fraction (fx) to the PF would have acceptable toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Tested dose levels (DLs) were 3.6 Gy × 15 fx (DL1); 4.7 Gy × 10 fx (DL2); and 7.1 Gy × 5 fx (DL3). Escalation followed a 6 + 6 rules-based design with 12 patients required at the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade (G) ≥3, gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03). Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires. RESULTS Twenty-four patients with indications for adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy (RT) enrolled (6 at DL1 and 2; 12 at DL3). All patients had at least 6 months of follow-up (median follow-up, 14.1 months). Four patients received concurrent androgen deprivation therapy. No G ≥ 3 GI or GU toxicity was seen at any DL; 2 of 6 patients in the DL1 group, 3 of 6 in DL2, and 7 of 12 in DL3 experienced G2 GI toxicity during RT. Except in 1 patient, all acute G2 GI toxicity resolved by 10 weeks. Three of 12 patients reported an increase to G1 and G2 GU toxicity in the 2 weeks after RT in groups DL1 and DL2 and 1 of 12 patients in DL3. At week 2 after RT, decline in the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite bowel domain met criteria for a minimally important difference in 71% of patients. At week 10, 1 of 6, 2 of 6, and 7 of 11 patients at DLs 1, 2, and 3, respectively, still met minimally important difference criteria. International Prostate Symptom Scores worsened 2 weeks after treatment but improved by 6 to 10 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Dose escalation up to 7.1 Gy × 5 fx to the PF was completed without acute G ≥ 3 toxicity. There was transient G2 rectal toxicity at all DLs during and immediately after RT. We must perform long-term follow-up and assessment of late toxicity of SBRT to the PF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie K Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Chunqiao Luo
- Department of Preventative Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Igor Shuryak
- Center for Radiological Research, New York, New York
| | - David I Quinn
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tanya Dorff
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Shamim Jhimlee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Raymond Chiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Andre Abreu
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Richard Jennelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Monish Aron
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Susan Groshen
- Department of Preventative Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cuccia F, Mortellaro G, Serretta V, Valenti V, Tripoli A, Gueci M, Luca N, Lo Casto A, Ferrera G. Hypofractionated postoperative helical tomotherapy in prostate cancer: a mono-institutional report of toxicity and clinical outcomes. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:5053-5060. [PMID: 30464605 PMCID: PMC6214338 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s182016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This is a mono-institutional study of acute and late toxicities and early biochemical control of a retrospective series of 75 prostate cancer patients treated with moderate postoperative hypofractionation delivered by helical tomotherapy (HT). Patients and methods From April 2013 to June 2017, 75 patients received adjuvant (n=37) or salvage (n=38) treatment, delivering to prostate bed a total dose of 63.8 Gy (equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions=67.4 Gy) using 2.2 Gy fractions. Whole-pelvis irradiation was performed in 63% of cases (median dose, 49.3 Gy; range, 48–55.1 Gy). Concurrent hormonal therapy was administered in 46% of cases. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) was adopted for acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity evaluations. Biochemical progression was defined as PSA level increase of ≥0.2 or more above the postoperative radiotherapy (RT) nadir. Results Acute GU toxicities were as follows: G1 in 46% and G2 in 4%, detecting no G≥3 events. For GI toxicity, we recorded G1 in 36% and G2 in 18%. With a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 12–58 months), we found late toxicity G2 GI in 6.6% and G≥2 GU in 5.3%, including two patients who underwent surgical incontinence correction. Acute GI≥2 toxicity and diabetes were found to be predictive of late GI≥2 toxicity (P=0.04 and P=0.0019). Actuarial 2- and 3-year biochemical recurrence-free survivals were 88% and 73%, respectively, for the entire population. Conclusion In our experience, moderate hypofractionated postoperative RT with HT was feasible and safe, with reports of low incidence of toxicity and promising biochemical control rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, .,Radiation Oncology, ARNAS-Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy,
| | | | - Vincenzo Serretta
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vito Valenti
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, .,Radiation Oncology, ARNAS-Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy,
| | - Antonella Tripoli
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, .,Radiation Oncology, ARNAS-Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy,
| | - Marina Gueci
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, .,Radiation Oncology, ARNAS-Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy,
| | - Nicoletta Luca
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy, .,Radiation Oncology, ARNAS-Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy,
| | - Antonio Lo Casto
- Radiation Oncology School, Section of Radiological Sciences, DIBIMED, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Saldi S, Bellavita R, Lancellotta V, Palumbo I, Lupattelli M, Chierchini S, Falcinelli L, Zucchetti C, Bini V, Aristei C. Acute Toxicity Profiles of Hypofractionated Adjuvant and Salvage Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Prospective Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 103:105-111. [PMID: 30121233 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2017] [Revised: 07/29/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) is controversial after radical prostatectomy (RP). In this interim analysis, our prospective observational study assessed acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity after hypofractionated adjuvant and salvage RT, as delivered by helical tomotherapy (HT), in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS After undergoing RP with or without pelvic lymph node dissection, 112 patients were enrolled. Hypofractionated adjuvant RT (2.25 Gy daily for 29 fractions; total 65.25 Gy) was administered to 40 patients with high-risk features. Hypofractionated salvage RT (2.25 Gy daily for 32 or 33 fractions; total 72-74.25 Gy) was prescribed for 72 patients (24 with biochemical relapse, 48 with local relapse). Toxicity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.02. The impact of RT on urinary flow was assessed by uroflowmetry. RESULTS Acute GU toxicity occurred in 41 of 112 patients (36%) (G1 31, G2 10). Acute GI toxicity was observed in 55 (49%) patients (G1 44, G2 11). Uroflowmetry showed that only salvage RT reduced maximum flow significantly (maximum, 68 vs 50 mL/s; P = .003), perhaps because a higher RT dose had been administered. CONCLUSIONS After RP, moderate hypofractionated adjuvant and salvage RT were associated with acceptable incidences of slight-to-moderate acute GU and GI toxicity and had little impact on urinary flow. Prospective trials are warranted with longer follow-up in larger cohorts to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simonetta Saldi
- Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Rita Bellavita
- Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Isabella Palumbo
- Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Marco Lupattelli
- Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Sara Chierchini
- Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Falcinelli
- Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Claudio Zucchetti
- Section of Medical Physics, University of Perugia and Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Vittorio Bini
- Department of Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology & Metabolism, University of Perugia and Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Barra S, Belgioia L, Marcenaro M, Callegari S, Pastorino A, Trapani L, Cavagnetto F, Garelli S, Corvò R. Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy after prostatectomy for cancer patients: toxicity and clinical outcome. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:473-480. [PMID: 29559810 PMCID: PMC5856046 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s146131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background After radical prostatectomy (RP) radiotherapy (RT) plays a role, both as adjuvant
or salvage treatment. If negative features are present such as extracapsular
extension, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph invasion, and positive surgical
margins, RT after RP reduces the risk of recurrence, although it is associated
with an increased risk of acute and late toxicities. An intensified RT delivered
in a shortened time could improve clinical outcome and be safely combined with
hormonal therapy (HT). The aim of this study was to determine the acute and late
toxicities associated with hypofractionated RT and to assess the impact of the
addition of HT to RT in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients on overall
response and toxicity. Materials and methods Sixty-four PC patients undergoing RP were included in this retrospective study.
All patients were recommended to receive adjuvant or salvage RT. Prescription
doses were 62.5 Gy in 25 fractions to prostate bed, 56.25 Gy in 25 fractions to
seminal vesicles bed, and 50 Gy in 25 fractions to pelvis if indicated. HT was
administered to patients with additional adverse pathologic features including
Gleason score >7, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL before
surgery, or prostate-specific antigen with rapid doubling time after relapse or
nodal involvement. After completion of RT, patients were observed after 4 weeks,
and then followed-up every 3–6 months. Acute and late toxicities were
assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4 and Radiation
Therapy Oncology Group scale, respectively. Results For acute toxicity, only grade 1 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities
were detected in 17% and 11% of patients, respectively. As regards late toxicity,
only 5% of the patients developed grade 1 gastrointestinal adverse event; grade 1,
grade 2, and grade 3 genitourinary toxicity was recorded in 5%, 3.3%, and 3.3% of
patients, respectively. Two and 5 years overall survival were 98% and 96%,
respectively. The curves stratified for treatment show a slight difference between
patients receiving RT or RT+HT, but the differences did not reach statistical
significance (p=0.133). Conclusion In patients with PC undergoing RP, hypofractionated RT may contribute to achieve a
high overall survival with an acceptable toxicity profile. Combination of RT and
HT is also well tolerated and efficacious.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvina Barra
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Liliana Belgioia
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michela Marcenaro
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Serena Callegari
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alice Pastorino
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Trapani
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Garelli
- Medical Physics Department, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Byun SJ, Kim YS, Ahn H, Kim CS. Image-guided, whole-pelvic, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0190479. [PMID: 29320570 PMCID: PMC5761863 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal field size of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for biochemical recurrence, particularly for patients with high-risk prostate cancer, remains undefined. This retrospective analysis was performed to investigate oncological outcomes as well as treatment-related toxicity following salvage intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to the whole pelvis and to compare the results with other studies implementing a small field size of the prostate bed. Methods The medical records of 170 patients with high-risk prostate cancer who received SRT for biochemical recurrence following prostatectomy were reviewed. Whole-pelvic IMRT was administered with a median dose of 66 Gy in 30 fractions. To improve treatment accuracy, an endorectal balloon device and daily cone-beam computed tomography were utilized. Androgen-deprivation therapy combined with SRT was administered to 97 (57.1%) patients. Results Eventually, 68 (40.0%) patients showed biochemical progression (BCP) after SRT. With a median follow-up period of 56 months, the 5-year BCP-free survival was 38.6%. The overall and cause-specific survival rates were 90.9% and 96.7%, respectively. Regarding BCP-free survival analysis, pathological T stage, persistent prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation after prostatectomy, and preSRT PSA level were significant prognostic factors on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, pathological T stage and preSRT PSA value retained their significance. Acute and late grade-3 genitourinary toxicities were observed in one (0.6%) and five (2.9%) patients, respectively. One patient each developed acute and late grade-3 gastrointestinal toxicity. Conclusion SRT to whole pelvis using IMRT and image guidance is as safe as SRT to the prostate bed, but its efficacy should be confirmed in ongoing randomized trials. PreSRT PSA was the only controllable prognostic factor, suggesting the benefit of early SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Jun Byun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Seok Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hanjong Ahn
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Choung-Soo Kim
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Picardi C, Perret I, Miralbell R, Zilli T. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the postoperative setting: What is the evidence so far? Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 62:91-96. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2017] [Revised: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
22
|
Zumsteg ZS, Daskivich TJ, Sandler HM. Salvage Radiotherapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2017; 34:3829-3833. [PMID: 27573664 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.69.2509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice. A 67-year-old man had presented to his primary physician for routine health maintenance. A digital rectal examination was performed and revealed a suspicious nodule in the right lobe of the prostate without any extraprostatic extension. A serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test was 12.4 ng/mL. He had no previous PSA tests. Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy showed Gleason 3 + 4 prostate adenocarcinoma in seven of 12 cores. Bone scan and computed tomography scan of the pelvis showed no evidence of metastatic disease, and the patient underwent a robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Pathology revealed Gleason 3 + 4 adenocarcinoma bilaterally, with extracapsular extension, no seminal vesicle invasion, a 2-mm positive margin at the right mid gland, and 0 of 15 lymph nodes containing adenocarcinoma. Two months after surgery, he had mild stress urinary incontinence and PSA of < 0.1 ng/mL. Adjuvant radiotherapy was discussed, but he elected to have careful follow-up. His PSA was monitored every 6 months and gradually increased from < 0.1 ng/mL to 0.4 ng/mL over the next 3 years. He was asymptomatic. He was referred to discuss the role of salvage radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
23
|
Moderate Hypofractionated Postprostatectomy Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy With Daily Image Guidance (VMAT-IGRT): A Mono-institutional Report on Feasibility and Acute Toxicity. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15:e667-e673. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2016] [Revised: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
24
|
Volumetric image-guided highly conformal radiotherapy of the prostate bed: Toxicity analysis. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016; 22:64-70. [PMID: 27920610 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2016] [Revised: 07/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate toxicity of high conformal image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate bed. BACKGROUND Radiotherapy of the prostate bed has a pivotal role in the post-operative and salvage settings, but few clinical data are available on the use of daily image guidance in combination with highly conformal techniques, and data on long-term results are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed 118 patients irradiated on the prostate bed using conformal plans processed with a micro-multileaf collimator, and daily checking treatment set-up with a cone-beam CT system. Correlation between toxicity and clinical-dosimetric parameters was assessed by the Cox regression model and log-rank test. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Median follow-up was 54.08 months. Late grade ≥2 gastro-intestinal (GI) and genito-urinary (GU) toxicity were 3.4% and 4.2%, respectively. Actuarial 4-year late grade ≥2 GI and GU toxicities were 4% and 6%, respectively. Four-year relapse-free survival was 87%. At log-rank test, acute grade ≥2 GI toxicity is associated with the use of antihypertensives (p = 0.03), and there is a trend toward significance between the use of anticoagulants and late grade ≥2 GI toxicity (p = 0.07). At Cox analysis, acute grade ≥2 GU toxicity is correlated with the percentage of bladder volume receiving more than 65 Gy (p = 0.02, HR 1.87 CI 1.25-2.8), and the maximal dose to the rectum is correlated to the development of late grade ≥2 GI toxicity (p = 0.03, HR 2.75 CI 1.10-6.9). CONCLUSIONS Conformal volumetric image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate bed leads to low toxicity rates.
Collapse
|
25
|
Goineau A, d'Aillières B, de Decker L, Supiot S. Integrating Geriatric Assessment into Decision-Making after Prostatectomy: Adjuvant Radiotherapy, Salvage Radiotherapy, or None? Front Oncol 2015; 5:227. [PMID: 26528437 PMCID: PMC4606064 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite current advancements in the field, management of older prostate cancer patients still remains a big challenge for Geriatric Oncology. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (ISGO) has recently updated its recommendations in this area, and these have been widely adopted, notably by the European Association of Urology. This article outlines the principles that should be observed in the management of elderly patients who have recently undergone prostatectomy for malignancy or with a biochemical relapse following prostatectomy. Further therapeutic intervention should not be considered in those patients who are classified as frail in the geriatric assessment. In patients presenting better health conditions, salvage radiotherapy is to be preferred to adjuvant radiotherapy, which is only indicated in certain exceptional cases. Radiotherapy of the operative bed presents a higher risk to the elderly. Additionally, hormone therapy clearly shows higher side effects in older patients and therefore it should not be administered to asymptomatic patients. We propose a decision tree based on the ISGO recommendations, with specific modifications for patients in biochemical relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurore Goineau
- Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Papin , Angers , France
| | | | - Laure de Decker
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau , St Herblain , France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau , St Herblain , France
| |
Collapse
|