1
|
Swensen S, Liao JJ, Chen JJ, Kim K, Ma TM, Weg ES. The expanding role of radiation oncology across the prostate cancer continuum. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04408-3. [PMID: 38900319 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04408-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is used in the treatment of prostate cancer in a variety of disease states with significant reliance on imaging to guide clinical decision-making and radiation delivery. In the definitive setting, the choice of radiotherapy treatment modality, dose, and fractionation for localized prostate cancer is determined by the patient's initial risk stratification and other clinical considerations. Radiation is also an option as salvage therapy in patients with locoregionally recurrent disease after prior definitive radiation or surgery. In recent years, the role of radiation has expanded for patients with metastatic disease, including prostate-directed radiotherapy in de novo low volume metastatic disease, metastasis-directed therapy for oligorecurrent disease, and palliative management of symptomatic metastases in the advanced setting. Here we review the expanding role of radiation in the treatment of prostate cancer in the definitive, locoregionally recurrent, and metastatic settings, as well as highlight the role of imaging in clinical reasoning, radiation planning, and treatment delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasha Swensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Jonathan J Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Katherine Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Emily S Weg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Zhang F, Hu K, Yu L, Zhang J, Luo C, Yu L, Yan J. CT-guided hydrogel injection for brachytherapy in cervical cancer: A case report. Med Dosim 2024:S0958-3947(24)00024-4. [PMID: 38902140 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2024.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
Rectal toxicity is a significant concern in cervical cancer radiotherapy. Despite advancements in image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT), rectal morbidity remains a challenge. Injectable hydrogel showed promise in creating a space between the vagina and rectum, reducing rectal radiation dose; however, the traditional ultrasound-guided injection revealed some problems, such as the inadequate separation of the upper edge of the cervix, which can be mitigated through adopting CT-guided injection. This case report presents the successful use of computed tomography (CT)-guided hydrogel injection to limit rectal doses and improve treatment outcomes. A forty-year-old female with stage IIIC1r cervical cancer received external-beam radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Due to the proximity of the tumor to the rectum, a CT-guided hydrogel injection was performed to increase the distance between the cervix and rectum. Post-injection, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated increased distances between the cervix and rectum. Subsequent MRI-based IGBT achieved high clinical target volume doses while limiting rectal doses. During the six-month follow-up, the patient reported only mild adverse effects. CT-guided hydrogel injection offers advantages over ultrasound-guided injection in cervical cancer radiotherapy. The technique allows for better puncture position adjustment, reduced reliance on specialized ultrasound expertise, and shorter puncture distances. This case report highlights the potential of hydrogel injection as a viable method to reduce rectal morbidity and improve treatment outcomes in a broader range of cervical cancer patients. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore its applicability in larger cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxuan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China; Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Fuquan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Lang Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Chunli Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Lihua Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Junfang Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mattes MD. Overview of Radiation Therapy in the Management of Localized and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11934-024-01217-5. [PMID: 38861238 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01217-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The goal is to describe the evolution of radiation therapy (RT) utilization in the management of localized and metastatic prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Long term data for a variety of hypofractionated definitive RT dose-fractionation schemes has matured, allowing patients and providers many standard-of-care options to choose from. Post-prostatectomy, adjuvant RT has largely been replaced by an early salvage approach. Multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET have enabled increasingly targeted RT delivery to the prostate and oligometastatic tumors. Areas of active investigation include determining the value of proton beam therapy and perirectal spacers, and optimally incorporate genomic tumor profiling and next generation hormonal therapies with RT in the curative setting. The use of radiation therapy to treat prostate cancer is rapidly evolving. In the coming years, there will be continued improvements in a variety of areas to enhance the value of RT in multidisciplinary prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm D Mattes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Le Guevelou J, Sargos P, Ferretti L, Supiot S, Pasquier D, Créhange G, Blanchard P, Hennequin C, Chapet O, Schick U, Baty M, Masson I, Ploussard G, De Crevoisier R, Latorzeff I. Sexual Structure Sparing for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:332-343. [PMID: 37640583 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Erectile dysfunction represents a major side effect of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment, negatively impacting men's quality of life. While radiation therapy (RT) advances have enabled the mitigation of both genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities, no significant improvement has been showed in sexual quality of life over time. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this review was to assess sexual structures' dose-volume parameters associated with the onset of erectile dysfunction. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov until January 4, 2023. Studies reporting the impact of the dose delivered to sexual structures on sexual function or the feasibility of innovative sexual structure-sparing approaches were deemed eligible. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Sexual-sparing strategies have involved four sexual organs. The mean penile bulb doses exceeding 20 Gy are predictive of erectile dysfunction in modern PCa RT trial. Maintaining a D100% of ≤36 Gy on the internal pudendal arteries showed preservation of erectile function in 88% of patients at 5 yr. Neurovascular bundle sparing appears feasible with magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, yet its clinical impact remains unanswered. Doses delivered to the testicles during PCa RT usually remain <2 Gy and generate a decrease in testosterone levels ranging from -4.6% to -17%, unlikely to have any clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS Current data highlight the technical feasibility of sexual sparing for PCa RT. The proportion of erectile dysfunction attributable to the dose delivered to sexual structures is still largely unknown. While the ability to maintain sexual function over time is impacted by factors such as age or comorbidities, only selected patients are likely to benefit from sexual-sparing RT. PATIENT SUMMARY Technical advances in radiation therapy (RT) made it possible to significantly lower the dose delivered to sexual structures. While sexual function is known to decline with age, the preservation of sexual structures for prostate cancer RT is likely to be beneficial only in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Stephane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- CNRS, CRIStAL UMR 9189, Université de Lille & Centrale Lille, Lille, France
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, INSERM U1018 Oncostat, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Olivier Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Ulrike Schick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Brest, France
| | - Manon Baty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Ingrid Masson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, Clinique La Croix-du-Sud, Quint-Fonsegrives, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Millot JC, Arenas-Gallo C, Silver E, Goldman M, Picciotto S, Jia AY, Zaorsky NG, Spratt DE, Fredman ET, Shoag JE. Major Complications and Adverse Events Related to Use of SpaceOAR Hydrogel for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy. Urology 2024; 188:94-100. [PMID: 38458325 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.12.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence and severity of SpaceOAR-related adverse events using the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. METHODS We analyzed SpaceOAR-related adverse event reports in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database from January 2015 to May 2023. For each report, the event type, associated device and patient problems, event description, event timing, and event severity stratified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE) grading system were recorded. RESULTS From 2015 to 2022, 206,619 SpaceOAR devices were sold. From January 2015 to May 2023, we identified 981 reports describing 990 SpaceOAR-related adverse events. Malfunctions were the most common event type (N = 626), followed by patient injuries (N = 350) with few reported deaths (N = 5). Device positioning problems were the most frequent device issue (N = 686). Pain was the most reported patient problem (N = 216). Abscesses and fistulas related to the device were each reported in 91 events. A noteworthy portion of relevant adverse events occurred before the initiation of radiation (N = 35, 22.4%), suggesting the device, rather than the radiation, was responsible. In total, 470 (50.2%) and 344 (36.7%) of the adverse events were CTCAE grade 1 and 2, respectively. There were 123 (13.1%) events that were CTCAE grade ≥3. CONCLUSION We identified multiple reports of SpaceOAR-related adverse events, many of which are more serious than have been reported in clinical trials. While SpaceOAR use is common, suggesting these events are rare, these data highlight the need for continued postmarket surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack C Millot
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Camilo Arenas-Gallo
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Esther Silver
- Department of Neuroscience, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Shany Picciotto
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Angela Y Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Elisha T Fredman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Jonathan E Shoag
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Morita M, Hiramatsu A, Nishimura K, Yanagida W, Nakamura S, Yamatoya J, Noguchi T, Tanabe M, Fukagai T, Lederer JL. Radiation proctitis after iodine-125 low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy utilizing SpaceOAR hydrogel. Int J Urol 2024. [PMID: 38822580 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of combining the SpaceOAR (SOAR) hydrogel with prostate brachytherapy, using colonoscopy findings to assess for radiation proctitis. METHODS Among 731 patients undergoing iodine-125 low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), SOAR was utilized in 394 patients (53.9%). Colonoscopy was performed for 97 patients (13.3%) to assess the presence, location, condition, and treatment of radiation proctitis. We also investigated treatment factors associated with the occurrence of radiation proctitis. RESULTS Radiation proctitis was observed in 57 patients (7.8%) and 17 (2.3%) were treated with argon plasma coagulation (APC). The incidence of radiation proctitis was 12.2% in the non-SOAR and 4.1% in the SOAR group (p < 0.001). In the non-SOAR group, the incidence of radiation proctitis was 6.6% for LDR-BT monotherapy and increased to 22.0% when combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (p = 0.001). However, in the SOAR group, these rates significantly decreased to 3.3% and 5.7% for monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively (p = 0.035, p < 0.001). With SOAR, inflammation was observed directly above the DL in most patients (87.5%), and only one patient (6.3%) required APC. The absence of SOAR (p < 0.001, HR = 0.29) and the concurrent use of EBRT (p = 0.018, HR = 2.87) were identified as significant risk factors for the occurrence of radiation proctitis. CONCLUSION The use of SOAR significantly reduced the incidence of radiation proctitis in patients undergoing LDR-BT monotherapy and combined EBRT. Inflammation primarily occurred directly above the DL; further examination is necessary to clarify its cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Morita
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aya Hiramatsu
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kota Nishimura
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wahei Yanagida
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Saori Nakamura
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jin Yamatoya
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Noguchi
- Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayo Tanabe
- Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukagai
- Department of Urology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - John L Lederer
- Department of Surgery, JABSOM, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Klaassen Z, Kyle Cline J, Sayyid RK. Editorial Comment on "Major Complications and Adverse Events Related to Use of SpaceOAR Hydrogel for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy". Urology 2024; 188:101-102. [PMID: 38648944 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Klaassen
- Department of Urology, Wellstar MCG Health, Augusta, GA; Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA.
| | - J Kyle Cline
- Department of Urology, Wellstar MCG Health, Augusta, GA
| | - Rashid K Sayyid
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Man J, Shen Y, Song Y, Yang K, Pei P, Hu L. Biomaterials-mediated radiation-induced diseases treatment and radiation protection. J Control Release 2024; 370:318-338. [PMID: 38692438 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.04.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, the intersection of the academic and medical domains has increasingly spotlighted the utilization of biomaterials in radioactive disease treatment and radiation protection. Biomaterials, distinguished from conventional molecular pharmaceuticals, offer a suite of advantages in addressing radiological conditions. These include their superior biological activity, chemical stability, exceptional histocompatibility, and targeted delivery capabilities. This review comprehensively delineates the therapeutic mechanisms employed by various biomaterials in treating radiological afflictions impacting the skin, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, and hematopoietic systems. Significantly, these nanomaterials function not only as efficient drug delivery vehicles but also as protective agents against radiation, mitigating its detrimental effects on the human body. Notably, the strategic amalgamation of specific biomaterials with particular pharmacological agents can lead to a synergistic therapeutic outcome, opening new avenues in the treatment of radiation- induced diseases. However, despite their broad potential applications, the biosafety and clinical efficacy of these biomaterials still require in-depth research and investigation. Ultimately, this review aims to not only bridge the current knowledge gaps in the application of biomaterials for radiation-induced diseases but also to inspire future innovations and research directions in this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianping Man
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection & School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China
| | - Yanhua Shen
- Experimental Animal Centre of Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215005, China
| | - Yujie Song
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection & School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China
| | - Kai Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection & School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China
| | - Pei Pei
- Teaching and Research Section of Nuclear Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, Anhui, People's Republic of China..
| | - Lin Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School of Radiation Medicine and Protection & School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123, China..
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alexander GS, Krc RF, Assif JW, Sun K, Molitoris JK, Tran P, Rana Z, Mishra MV. Conditional Risk and Predictive Factors Associated with Late Toxicity for Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy Alone on Randomized Trial RTOG 0126. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00686-2. [PMID: 38825251 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to characterize the conditional risk of developing a grade 2+ urinary or gastrointestinal toxicity for patients treated with external beam radiotherapy on RTOG 0126. A secondary objective was to analyze baseline patient and treatment characteristics and determine their relevance in predicting toxicity both at the time of trial enrollment and later points of follow up. METHODS AND MATERIALS 1,532 patients with localized prostate cancer were enrolled between March 2002 and August 2008, of whom 1,499 were eligible and included in data analysis with a median follow up of 8.4 years (range 0.02-13). Patients were treated with either 3DCRT or IMRT according to institutional practice without the addition of androgen deprivation and randomized to receive either standard dose radiotherapy of 70.2 Gy or dose escalated radiotherapy of 79.2 Gy of radiotherapy to the prostate only with standard fractionation. UVA and MVA analyses were determine if initial factors were predictive of late toxicity at time of treatment and at later timepoints. RESULTS As patients proceed further from completion of radiotherapy without the development of toxicity, the subsequent risk of both grade 2+ GU and GI toxicity decreased with time. At time of enrollment the risk of developing a grade 2+ toxicity over the next 5 years was 9.57 and 17.89% respectively. After five years of toxicity free survival, the risk of developing a grade 2+ GU or GI toxicity in the subsequent five years was 3.02% and 1.54% respectively. Baseline treatment and patient related factors predicted late toxicity both at trial enrollment and after two years of toxicity free survivorship. Baseline urinary dysfunction and dose escalated radiotherapy were associated with increased late GU toxicity. Acute GI toxicity and dose escalated radiotherapy were associated with increased risk of late GI toxicity. Treatment with IMRT was associated with reduced risk of either toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The conditional risk of grade 2+ toxicities decrease as patients proceed further from treatment with most toxicities occurring in the first few years after treatment completion. Baseline patient and treatment characteristics remain relevant at both enrollment and later time points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory S Alexander
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia PA
| | - Rebecca F Krc
- Department of Radiation oncology, university of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - James W Assif
- Department of Radiation oncology, university of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kai Sun
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine..
| | | | - Phuoc Tran
- University of Maryland School Of Medicine, Baltimore
| | - Zaker Rana
- University of Maryland School Of Medicine, Baltimore
| | - Mark V Mishra
- University of Maryland School Of Medicine, Baltimore..
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nakai Y, Tanaka N, Asakawa I, Ohnishi K, Miyake M, Yamaki K, Torimoto K, Fujimoto K. Efficacy of a hydrogel spacer for improving quality of life in patients with prostate cancer undergoing low-dose-rate brachytherapy alone or in combination with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: An observational study using propensity score matching. Prostate 2024. [PMID: 38734992 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether a hydrogel spacer can improve quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) alone or in combination with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS We enrolled patients with prostate cancer who underwent LDR-BT alone with (n = 186) or without (n = 348) a hydrogel spacer, or underwent LDR-BT in combination with IMRT with (n = 70) or without (n = 217) a hydrogel spacer. QOL was evaluated using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaires at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation. The groups were compared using propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS Among patients who underwent LDR-BT alone, there were no differences regarding changes in urinary, bowel, sexual, or hormonal domain scores between the spacer and no-spacer groups; however, the dose at the bowel was significantly lower in the spacer group than in the no-spacer group. Among patients who underwent LDR-BT in combination with IMRT, there were no differences regarding changes in urinary, sexual, or hormonal domain scores between the spacer and no-spacer groups. However, the changes in the bowel domain score were significantly lower in the spacer group than in the no-spacer group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A hydrogel spacer may not improve impaired urinary, bowel, or sexual QOL in patients undergoing LDR-BT alone. However, in patients undergoing LDR-BT in combination with IMRT, a hydrogel spacer can improve impaired bowel QOL but not sexual or urinary QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasushi Nakai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan
- Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Nobumichi Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan
- Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Isao Asakawa
- Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Kenta Ohnishi
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Kaori Yamaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Torimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu YH, Shen SH, Wang YP, Chang NW, Lee PC, Li CP, Lan KL, Shiau CY, Hu YW, Huang PI, Hsu CX, Yen SH, Hsu SM. Feasibility estimation of injected hydrodissection before definitive radiotherapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Chin Med Assoc 2024; 87:511-515. [PMID: 38478012 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000001084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is often not diagnosed until an advanced stage, and so most patients are not eligible for resection. For patients who are inoperable, definitive radiotherapy is crucial for local disease control. However, the pancreas is located close to other vulnerable gastrointestinal organs, making it challenging to deliver an adequate radiation dose. The surgical insertion of spacers or injection of fluids such as hydrogel before radiotherapy has been proposed, however, no study has discussed which patients are suitable for the procedure. METHODS In this study, we reviewed 50 consecutive patients who received definitive radiotherapy at our institute to determine how many could have benefitted from hydrodissection to separate the pancreatic tumor from the adjacent gastrointestinal tract. By hypothetically injecting a substance using either computed tomography (CT)-guided or endoscopic methods, we aimed to increase the distance between the pancreatic tumor and surrounding hollow organs, as this would reduce the radiation dose delivered to the organs at risk. RESULTS An interventional radiologist considered that hydrodissection was feasible in 23 (46%) patients with a CT-guided injection, while a gastroenterologist considered that hydrodissection was feasible in 31 (62%) patients with an endoscopic injection. Overall, we found 14 (28%) discrepancies among the 50 patients reviewed. Except for 1 patient who had no available trajectory with a CT-guided approach but in whom hydrodissection was considered feasible with an endoscopic injection, the other 13 patients had different interpretations of whether direct invasion was present in the CT images. CONCLUSION Our results suggested that about half of the patients could have benefited from hydrodissection before radiotherapy. This finding could allow for a higher radiation dose and potentially better disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Hung Wu
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Therapeutic and Research Center of Pancreatic Cancer, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shu-Huei Shen
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yen-Po Wang
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Therapeutic and Research Center of Pancreatic Cancer, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Nai-Wen Chang
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Pei-Chang Lee
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Therapeutic and Research Center of Pancreatic Cancer, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chung-Pin Li
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Therapeutic and Research Center of Pancreatic Cancer, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Clinical Skills Training, Department of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Keng-Li Lan
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Therapeutic and Research Center of Pancreatic Cancer, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Cheng-Yin Shiau
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yu-Wen Hu
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Pin-I Huang
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Therapeutic and Research Center of Pancreatic Cancer, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chen-Xiong Hsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Sang-Hue Yen
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Municipal Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shih-Ming Hsu
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liu K, Russo M, Ellis JS, Capua JD, Wu D, Smolinski-Zhao S, Kalva S, Arellano RS, Irani Z, Uppot R, Linderman SW, Gupta R, Aizenberg J, Srinivasan S, Som A. Transient, Image-Guided Gel-Dissection for Percutaneous Thermal Ablation. Adv Healthc Mater 2024:e2400272. [PMID: 38678431 DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202400272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/30/2024]
Abstract
Image-guided tumor ablative therapies are mainstay cancer treatment options but often require intra-procedural protective tissue displacement to reduce the risk of collateral damage to neighboring organs. Standard of care strategies, such as hydrodissection (fluidic injection), are limited by rapid diffusion of fluid and poor retention time, risking injury to adjacent organs, increasing cancer recurrence rates from incomplete tumor ablations, and limiting patient qualification. Herein, a "gel-dissection" technique is developed, leveraging injectable hydrogels for longer-lasting, shapeable, and transient tissue separation to empower clinicans with improved ablation operation windows and greater control. A rheological model is designed to understand and tune gel-dissection parameters. In swine models, gel-dissection achieves 24 times longer-lasting tissue separation dynamics compared to saline, with 40% less injected volume. Gel-dissection achieves anti-dependent dissection between free-floating organs in the peritoneal cavity and clinically significant thermal protection, with the potential to expand minimally invasive therapeutic techniques, especially across locoregional therapies including radiation, cryoablation, endoscopy, and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Liu
- Materials Science & Mechanical Engineering, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Mario Russo
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Joshua S Ellis
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - John Di Capua
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Dufan Wu
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Sara Smolinski-Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Sanjeeva Kalva
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Ronald S Arellano
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Zubin Irani
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Raul Uppot
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Stephen W Linderman
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Rajiv Gupta
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Joanna Aizenberg
- Materials Science & Mechanical Engineering, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Shriya Srinivasan
- Materials Science & Mechanical Engineering, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Avik Som
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kobayashi H, Eriguchi T, Tanaka T, Ogata T, Osaki N, Suzuki H, Kosugi M, Kumabe A, Sato K, Ishida M. An optimal method of hydrogel spacer insertion for stereotactic body radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Jpn J Radiol 2024; 42:406-414. [PMID: 37932639 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-023-01506-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to explore an ideal method for hydrogel spacer insertion by analyzing the efficacy and safety of our originally developed apex expansion method. MATERIALS AND METHODS Overall, 100 patients with low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy were included. A hydrogel spacer was inserted in 64 and 36 patients using the conventional and apex expansion methods, respectively. For dosimetry, we trisected the rectum into the upper rectum, middle rectum, and lower rectum on the sagittal section of magnetic resonance imaging. We compared the dose to each part of the rectum between the two methods using dose-volume histograms. Genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity assessments were conducted until 3 months of follow-up. RESULTS The whole rectal dose in the apex expansion method group was lower than that in the conventional method group, which was significant in all dose regions (V5-V35). Similarly, in the apex expansion method group, the dose to the middle rectum was lower in the low- to high-dose region (V10-V35), and the dose to the lower rectum was lower in the middle- to high-dose region (V15-35). No Grade ≥ 3 toxicity or procedure-related complications were observed. Additionally, Grade 2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities during the treatment showed no significant differences between the two methods. CONCLUSION The apex expansion method may be safe and effective in achieving a more efficient rectal dose reduction by expanding the anterior perirectal space in the prostatic apex area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan.
- Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
| | - Takahisa Eriguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Red Cross Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomoki Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takeru Ogata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Noriko Osaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hideaki Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Michio Kosugi
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Kumabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Kozo Sato
- Department of Radiology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masaru Ishida
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hassan J, Kieft A, Miller S. SpaceOAR Complication Affecting the Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Cureus 2024; 16:e58485. [PMID: 38765433 PMCID: PMC11101208 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
A 60-year-old male presented with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 10 ng/ml. A transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy showed prostate adenocarcinoma GS 4+3 (grade 3) with 5 out of 12 cores positive for malignancy. He initially planned to have prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with SpaceOAR gel insertion in his rectoprostatic space to reduce radiation to the rectum. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) two months after SpaceOAR insertion showed evidence of infiltration of the SpaceOAR within the anterior rectal wall. This delayed his treatment and he was started on a short course of androgen deprivation therapy with Leuprolide while waiting for absorption of the gel. After completion of androgen deprivation therapy, the patient was treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the prostate, seminal vesicles, and pelvis to a total dose of 6000 centigray (cGy) in 20 fractions at a dose per fraction of 300 cGy. He did well after treatment with minimal side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacfar Hassan
- Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA
| | - Aria Kieft
- Radiation Oncology, Detroit Medical Center - Wayne State University, Detroit, USA
| | - Steven Miller
- Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Crook J, Moideen N, Arbour G, Castro F, Araujo C, Batchelar D, Halperin R, Hilts M, Kim D, Petrik D, Rose J, Cheng JC, Bachand F. A Randomized Trial Comparing Quality of Life After Low-Dose Rate or High-Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy Boost With Pelvic External Beam Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00381-X. [PMID: 38493901 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare health-related quality of life (QoL) in urinary, bowel, and sexual domains after combined external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and either low-dose rate (LDR) or high-dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy (BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible men with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer treated with combined pelvic EBRT and BT were randomly assigned to either HDR (15 Gy) or LDR (110 Gy) boost. International Prostate Symptom Score, Index of Erectile Function, and Expanded Prostate Cancer Composite were collected at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, every 6 months to 3 years and then annually along with prostate-specific antigen/testosterone. Fisher's exact test compared categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) domain scores. RESULTS From January 2014 to December 2019, a random number generator assigned 195 men: 108 to HDR and 87 to LDR. Median age was 71 years. Risk group was high in 57% and unfavorable intermediate in 43%. Androgen deprivation (used in 74%) began with 3 months neoadjuvant and continued for median 12 months. Baseline EPIC scores were similar for the LDR/HDR cohorts: 89 and 88 respectively for Genito-urinary; 92 and 93 for Gastro-intestinal. EPIC urinary scores decreased at 1 month for HDR but recovered promptly to a steady state by 6 months. LDR scores reached a nadir at 3 months with slow recovery to 18 months, after which urinary QoL was similar for HDR and LDR. Bowel QOL scores fell in both cohorts reaching respective nadirs at 12 months. HDR patients recovered close to baseline and maintained higher scores than LDR patients to 5 years. The decline for LDR patients remained more than the minimum clinically important difference out to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS The patient experience for combined EBRT and prostate BT is improved with HDR BT. Urinary QoL improves over time to be equivalent between the 2 modalities after 18 months, but LDR patients report lasting bowel symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juanita Crook
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Univeristy of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Nikitha Moideen
- Radiation Oncology, BCCancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Greg Arbour
- Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Felipe Castro
- Radiation Oncology, BCCancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cynthia Araujo
- Medical Physics, BCCancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Ross Halperin
- Radiation Oncology, BCCancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michelle Hilts
- Medical Physics, BCCancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David Kim
- Radiation Oncology, BCCancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David Petrik
- Radiation Oncology, BCCancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jim Rose
- Radiation Oncology, BCCancer, Abbottsford, British Columbia, Canada
| | - J C Cheng
- Radiation Oncology, BCCancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Takatsu J, Murakami N, Muramoto Y, Karino T, Oshima M, Kosugi Y, Kawamoto T, Terao Y, Shikama N. Safe dose escalation and reduction of the fraction number of uterine cervical brachytherapy using a gel spacer in the rectovaginal and vesicouterine septum: A planning study. Brachytherapy 2024; 23:115-122. [PMID: 38040605 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the possibility of dose escalation and reduction of fraction number in cervical brachytherapy using a gel spacer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty patients with uterine cervical cancer treated with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) were selected. Hyaluronic acid gel injection (HGI) was performed in the rectovaginal and vesicouterine septum for 10 patients. The other ten patients were not with HGI. Both groups were treated with IGABT involving tandem/ovoid or cylindrical applicators along with additional interstitial needles. Dose distributions approved by radiation oncologists were retrospectively analyzed, and a dose summation of 45 Gy/25 of external beam radiation therapy and IGABT was performed. Dose constraints for D2cc of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 80, 70, and 70 Gy, respectively. Equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions calculations used α/β = 10 Gy for high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) D90 and α/β = 3 Gy for organs at risks (OARs). As a planning study, dose distribution rescaling was conducted to deliver as much dose to CTVHR D90 as possible within the dose constraint limitation for OARs when IGABT was performed for four, three, and two fractions in both groups. RESULTS The median CTVHR D90 was >80 Gy in the non-HGI group and >85 Gy in the HGI group for virtual two and three fractions. Rectum D2cc was significantly lower in the HGI group for three fractions (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS In the HGI group, adequate dose delivery to CTVHR could be achieved with a reduced IGABT fraction number while meeting the dose constraints of OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Takatsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yoichi Muramoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuki Karino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaki Oshima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuo Kosugi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Terufumi Kawamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Terao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoto Shikama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Costa P, Vale J, Fonseca G, Costa A, Kos M. Use of rectal balloon spacer in patients with localized prostate cancer receiving external beam radiotherapy. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100237. [PMID: 38322778 PMCID: PMC10846399 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the balloon spacer when used to reduce the radiation dose delivered to the rectum in prostate cancer patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy. Method A single center retrospective analysis including 75 PC patients with localized T1-T3a disease who received balloon spacer followed by EBRT. Pre- and post-implantation computed tomography (CT) scans were utilized for treatment planning for standard EBRT (78-81 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy fractions). Rectal dosimetry was assessed using DVHs, and toxicities were graded with CTCAE v.4. Results A median (IQR) prostate-rectum separation resulted in 1.6 cm (1.4-2.0) post balloon spacer implantation. Overall, 90.6 % (68/75) of patients had a clinically significant 25 % relative reduction in the rectal with a median relative reduction of 91.8 % (71.2-98.6 %) at rV70. Three (4.0 %) patients reported mild procedural adverse events, anal discomfort and dysuria. Within 90 days post-implantation, five patients (6.67 %) and 1 patient (1.33 %) reported grade 1 and grade 2 rectal toxicities (anal pain, constipation, diarrhea and hemorrhoids). Genitourinary (GU) grade 1 toxicity was reported in 37 patients (49.33 %), with only one patient (1.33 %) experiencing grade 2 GU toxicity. No grade ≥ 3 toxicity was reported. Conclusion Balloon spacer implantation effectively increased prostate-rectum separation and associated with dosimetric gains EBRT for PC stage T1-T3a. Further controlled studies are required to ascertain whether this spacer allows for radiotherapy dose escalation and minimizes gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Costa
- CUF Porto Instituto, Rua Fonte das Sete Bicas, 170 - Piso -1 – 4460-188 SENHORA DA HORA, Porto Portugal
| | - Joana Vale
- CUF Porto Instituto, Rua Fonte das Sete Bicas, 170 - Piso -1 – 4460-188 SENHORA DA HORA, Porto Portugal
| | - Graça Fonseca
- CUF Porto Instituto, Rua Fonte das Sete Bicas, 170 - Piso -1 – 4460-188 SENHORA DA HORA, Porto Portugal
| | - Adelina Costa
- CUF Porto Instituto, Rua Fonte das Sete Bicas, 170 - Piso -1 – 4460-188 SENHORA DA HORA, Porto Portugal
| | - Michael Kos
- Brachytherapy Radiation Specialists Summit Cancer, 6506 Regal Ct., Reno, NV 99223, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ma TM, Ladbury C, Tran M, Keiper TD, Andraos T, Gogineni E, Mohideen N, Siva S, Loblaw A, Tree AC, Cheung P, Kresl J, Collins S, Cao M, Kishan AU. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Radiosurgery Society Guide to the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer Illustrated by Challenging Cases. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e117-e131. [PMID: 37661040 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Traditionally, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) involved lengthy courses with low daily doses. However, advancements in radiation delivery and a better understanding of prostate radiobiology have enabled the development of shorter courses of EBRT. Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy, administering doses greater than 5 Gy per fraction, is now considered a standard of care regimen for localized PCa, particularly for intermediate-risk disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), a specific type of ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy employing advanced planning, imaging, and treatment technology to deliver in five or fewer fractions, is gaining prominence as a cost-effective, convenient, and safe alternative to longer radiotherapy courses. It is crucial to address practical considerations related to patient selection, fractionation scheme, target delineation, and planning objectives. This is especially important in challenging clinical situations where clear evidence for guidance may be lacking. The Radiosurgery Society endorses this case-based guide with the aim of providing a practical framework for delivering SBRT to the intact prostate, exemplified by two case studies. The article will explore common SBRT dose/fractionation schemes and dose constraints for organs-at-risk. Additionally, it will review existing evidence and expert opinions on topics such as SBRT dose escalation, the use of rectal spacers, the role of androgen deprivation therapy in the context of SBRT, SBRT in special patient populations (e.g., high-risk disease, large prostate, high baseline urinary symptom burdens, and inflammatory bowel disease), as well as new imaging-guidance techniques like Magnetic Resonance Imaging for SBRT delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Colton Ladbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Maxwell Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Timothy D Keiper
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Therese Andraos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Emile Gogineni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Najeeb Mohideen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwest Community Hospital, Arlington Heights, Illinois
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alison C Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Kresl
- Phoenix CyberKnife and Radiation Oncology Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sean Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Giacometti V, McLaughlin O, Comiskey P, Marshall H, Houlihan OA, Whitten G, Prise KM, Hounsell AR, Jain S, McGarry CK. Validation of a Quality Metric Score to Assess the Placement of Hydrogel Rectal Spacer in Patients Treated With Prostate Stereotactic Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101396. [PMID: 38304109 PMCID: PMC10831189 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the quality of the interspace between the prostate and rectum and assess the effect on the dose to the rectum by measuring the spacer quality score (SQS) before and after implanting a hydrogel rectal spacer. Methods and Materials Thirty patients with prostate cancer were treated with stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy as part of the SPORT clinical trial. Each patient had a 10 mL polyethylene glycol hydrogel spacer inserted transperineally. Computed tomography scans were acquired before and after spacer insertion, 10MV flattening filter free (FFF) stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) treatment plans were generated using each image set. To calculate the SQS, the prostate-rectal interspace (PRI) was measured in the anterior-posterior orientation, parallel to the anatomic midline at the prostate base, apex, and midgland on the prespacer and postspacer computed tomography. Measurements were taken in 3 transverse positions between the prostate and the rectum, and PRI scores of 0, 1, and 2 were assigned if the interspace between prostate and rectum was <0.3, 0.3 to 0.9, or ≥1 cm, respectively. The overall SQS was the lowest of the PRI scores. Differences between prespacer and postspacer PRIs and SQS were investigated by performing Fisher's exact test and differences between doses to the rectum were investigated by performing the paired samples Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Student t test. Results Statistically significant differences between prespacer versus postspacer patients were found when grouping patients according to their overall SQS. The PRI summary score did not reach statistical significance between prespacer and postspacer at the base but was significantly higher for the prostate midline and apex. Statistically significant differences in some rectum dose-volume metrics were found when grouping patients according to their PRIs and SQS. Conclusions SQS before and after the spacer insertion was evaluated and was found to be correlated with pre- and postspacer rectal dosimetry. Sources of improvement of the SQS scoring metric and limitations are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Giacometti
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Owen McLaughlin
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick Comiskey
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Marshall
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Orla A. Houlihan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Glenn Whitten
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin M. Prise
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Alan R. Hounsell
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Suneil Jain
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Conor K. McGarry
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Poon DMC, Yuan J, Wong OL, Yang B, Tse MY, Lau KK, Chiu ST, Chiu PKF, Ng CF, Chui KL, Kwong YM, Ma WK, Cheung KY, Chiu G, Yu SK. One-year clinical outcomes of MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy with rectal spacer for patients with localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 2024; 42:97. [PMID: 38393414 PMCID: PMC10891188 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04784-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This prospective study aimed to investigate adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) with rectal spacer for localized prostate cancer (PC) and report 1-year clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-four consecutive patients with low- to high-risk localized PC that underwent 5-fraction adaptive MRgSBRT with rectal spacer were enrolled. The dosimetric comparison was performed on a risk- and age-matched cohort treated with MRgSBRT but without a spacer at a similar timepoint. Clinician-reported outcomes were based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Patient-reported outcomes were based on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire at baseline, acute (1-3 months), subacute (4-12 months), and late (> 12 months) phases. RESULTS The median follow-up was 390 days (range 28-823) and the median age was 70 years (range 58-82). One patient experienced rectal bleeding soon after spacer insertion that subsided before MRgSBRT. The median distance between the midline of the prostate midgland and the rectum after spacer insertion measured 7.8 mm (range 2.6-15.3), and the median length of the spacer was 45.9 mm (range 16.8-62.9) based on T2-weighted MR imaging. The use of spacer resulted in significant improvements in target coverage (V100% > 95% = 98.6% [range 93.4-99.8] for spacer vs. 97.8% [range 69.6-99.7] for non-spacer) and rectal sparing (V95% < 3 cc = 0.7 cc [range 0-4.6] for spacer vs. 4.9 cc [range 0-12.5] for non-spacer). Nine patients (26.5%) experienced grade 1 gastrointestinal toxicities, and no grade ≥ 2 toxicities were observed. During the 1-year follow-up period, EPIC scores for the bowel domain remained stable and were the highest among all other domains. CONCLUSIONS MRgSBRT with rectal spacer for localized PC showed exceptional tolerability with minimal gastrointestinal toxicities and satisfactory patient-reported outcomes. Improvements in dosimetry, rectal sparing, and target coverage were achieved with a rectal spacer. Randomized trials are warranted for further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, 11/F, HKSH Eastern Building, 3 Tung Wong Roade Road, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong SAR.
| | - Jing Yuan
- Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Oi Lei Wong
- Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Bin Yang
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Mei Yan Tse
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Ka Ki Lau
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Sin Ting Chiu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Chi Fai Ng
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Ka Lun Chui
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Yiu Ming Kwong
- Urology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Wai Kit Ma
- Hong Kong Urology Clinic, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Kin Yin Cheung
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - George Chiu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Siu Ki Yu
- Medical Physics Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pinkawa M, Haddad H, Schlenter M, Hermani H, Ho H, Kovács A, Chao M. Application of a Radiopaque Viscous Hydrogel Spacer for Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Phase 2 Study. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:57-64. [PMID: 37791943 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of a radiopaque viscous spacer (RVS) for prostate cancer radiation therapy (RT), including injection procedure, toxicity, treatment planning, image guidance, and imaging results up to 12 months after RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS RVS (median, 10 mL) was injected between prostate and rectal wall in 30 patients. Cone beam computed tomography (CT) was performed during the course of RT, a magnetic resonance imaging 3 and 12 months after RT. Injection and treatment tolerability were analyzed. The resulting distribution was compared with a control group of 30 patients with an initially fluid spacer. RESULTS Procedure- or device-related adverse events were not observed. Signs of hydrogel migration were not found in any case. The volume decreased by 25% at 3 months after RT, and small residues were detected at 12 months after RT in 3 cases (10%). The median rectal volume percentage within the 90% isodose was 3.0% (interquartile range, 1.5%-4.5%). Acute and late gastrointestinal toxicities were found in 17% and 3%, respectively (all grade 1). The median distance between prostate and rectum at the base/midplane/apex was greater for RVS in comparison to initially fluid spacer (14/12/11 mm vs 12/10/10 mm, respectively), the gel symmetry (right vs left from midline) was comparable. The application was assessed to be easier to control by the users, and visibility in cone beam CT as good. CONCLUSIONS The injection of a radiopaque viscous hydrogel spacer resulted in a prostate-rectum distance of >10 mm in most cases. The resulting rectum volume within the high-dose region and RT toxicity were very low. Advantages in comparison to the conventional hydrogel spacer are predominantly an improved placement control during the injection process and good visibility on CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Hathal Haddad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marsha Schlenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Horst Hermani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Huong Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Ringwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Attila Kovács
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Ringwood, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fernandez AM, Jones CP, Patel HV, Ghaffar U, Hakam N, Li KD, Nabavizadeh B, Breyer BN. Real-World Complications of the SpaceOAR Hydrogel Spacer: A Review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database. Urology 2024; 183:157-162. [PMID: 37774851 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize adverse events related to use of the perirectal spacing agent SpaceOAR, we examined the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. METHODS The MAUDE database was queried for "SpaceOAR" and "Augmenix" from June 2015 (when SpaceOAR was approved by the Food and Drug Administration) to October 2022. Reports were reviewed for adverse events (AEs), operative procedures performed because of the AE, and changes to the radiation plan. AEs were categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. RESULTS Six hundred fifty-four reports were reviewed. Eighty-four were excluded and 4 reports reviewed 2 separate cases of SpaceOAR administration. Five hundred seventy-four cases were ultimately included. Three deaths were reported (0.5% of all AEs). One point six percent of cases represented CTCAE grade 4 injuries (life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated), 15.9% grade 3 (severe but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization), 24.2% grade 2 (moderate; local/noninvasive intervention), and 57% of events were CTCAE grade 1 (mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms). Bowel diversion occurred in 29 cases (9%). CONCLUSION Both asymptomatic (n = 311) and debilitating (n = 12) complications of SpaceOAR hydrogel use were identified. Death, gel embolization, anaphylaxis, rectal ulcerations, and infections requiring bowel or urinary diversions were among the complications reviewed. Providers should consider these potential complications before perirectal spacer administration and during patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian M Fernandez
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Charles P Jones
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Hiren V Patel
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Umar Ghaffar
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nizar Hakam
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kevin D Li
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Behnam Nabavizadeh
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Benjamin N Breyer
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gejerman G, Goldstein MM, Chao M, Shore N, Lederer J, Crawford ED, Bukkapatnam R, Sylvester J, Orio PF. Barrigel Spacer Injection Technique. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e57-e61. [PMID: 37657504 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Glen Gejerman
- New Jersey Urology, VillageMD Research Institute, Saddle Brook, New Jersey.
| | - Martin M Goldstein
- New Jersey Urology, VillageMD Research Institute, Saddle Brook, New Jersey
| | - Michael Chao
- Ringwood Private Hospital, East Ringwood, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter F Orio
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nakahara M, Murakami N, Chiba T, Nagao A, Okuma K, Kashihara T, Kaneda T, Takahashi K, Inaba K, Nakayama Y, Kato T, Igaki H. Gynecological technical notes for appropriate spacer injections. Brachytherapy 2024; 23:45-51. [PMID: 38040606 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its efficacy, if adherence to dose constraints for surrounding normal tissues proves unattainable, the risk of late radiation-related adverse events after primary radiotherapy involving brachytherapy remains a noteworthy concern. Some studies suggest that similar to prostate radiotherapy, spacers may potentially reduce doses to surrounding healthy rectal or bladder tissues. However, guidance on spacer injections for gynecologic brachytherapy is scarce, and the optimal anatomical location for spacer placement remains undefined. We discuss maximizing the effects of spacers from an anatomical perspective. FINDINGS As vesicovaginal and rectovaginal septa form part of the endopelvic fascia and are not uniform tissues, spacer injection resistance varies. In pelvic organ prolapse surgery, saline is injected into the anterior and posterior vaginal walls as a spacer, and the vagina, vesicovaginal septum, and bladder can be fluidly dissected. Relatively firm vesicovaginal septum tissue is used as a reconstructive organ, whereas rectovaginal septum tissue is less dense. Cervical cancer is invasive, involving surrounding fascia and ligaments. Ideally, the vesicovaginal and rectovaginal septa should be resected in radical hysterectomy. Here, spacer adaptation and the technical details of injection are described. When using ultrasound guidance for spacer injection, the target site should be adequately magnified, and the spacer ideally injected into the incision layer during radical hysterectomy. Finally, posthysterectomy, the intestinal tract may adhere to the vaginal cuffs. Therefore, artificial ascites may be useful; however, the spread depends on perioperative manipulation. CONCLUSIONS Anatomical and surgical viewpoints are advantageous for safe, therapeutic, and replicable spacer injection administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariko Nakahara
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Takahito Chiba
- Section of Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayaka Nagao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kae Okuma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tairo Kashihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoya Kaneda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kana Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Inaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Nakayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Kato
- Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ma TM, Kishan AU. "Targeted microwave ablation: another way to kick the can(cer) down the road?". Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:635-636. [PMID: 36220855 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00603-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rezaee ME, Gardner U, Alshak MN, Greco SC, Song DY, Goldstein M, Pavlovich CP. Effect of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Prostate Biopsy on the Quality of Hydrogel Spacer Placement in Men Prior to Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Urology 2023; 182:27-32. [PMID: 37805052 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether prostate biopsy type affects spacer placement quality using a large sample of patients treated in the ambulatory setting. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who underwent hydrogel spacer placement before primary radiation treatment between 2018 and 2023 after transperineal (TP) or transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy. Study outcomes were Spacer Quality Score (SQS) (0-2, with greater values indicating better placement), Rectal Wall Infiltration (RWI) (0-3, with lower values indicating lack of RWI), and the occurrence of other hydrogel complications. RESULTS A total of 395 patients were included. A pre-hydrogel TR biopsy was performed in 273 patients (69.1%), while TP biopsy was performed in 122 (30.9%). A SQS ≥1 occurred in 308 (77.9%) patients. A greater proportion of TP patients had a favorable SQS (≥1) compared to those who underwent TR (87.7 vs 73.5%, P <.002). An RWI score ≥2 was found in 180 (45.6%) patients. The proportion of patients with an unfavorable RWI score (≥2) did not differ significantly by type of biopsy performed. Patients who had an interval of >70 days between biopsy and hydrogel placement had significantly decreased odds of an RWI score ≥2 (odds ratio = 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.83). Only one infection was found after hydrogel placement. CONCLUSION The quality of hydrogel placement was significantly better in men who had undergone TP biopsy. Rectal wall infiltration was more common than previously reported but did not differ between TP and TR biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Rezaee
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ulysses Gardner
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, MD
| | - Mark N Alshak
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Stephen C Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, MD
| | - Daniel Y Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael Goldstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christian P Pavlovich
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kato M, Higashi S, Sugino Y, Kajiwara S, Tanaka S, Kitano G, Yamashita Y, Ogura Y, Tachibana H, Kojima T, Inoue T. Clinical Efficacy and Openness to New Challenges of Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9824-9835. [PMID: 37999133 PMCID: PMC10670683 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Over a century ago, low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy was introduced to treat prostate cancer (PCa). Since then, it has been widely applied worldwide, including in East Asia. LDR brachytherapy has been performed in 88 institutes in Japan. Beneficial clinical outcomes of LDR brachytherapy for intermediate-to-high-risk PCa have been demonstrated in large clinical trials. These clinical outcomes were achieved through advances in methods, such as urological precise needle puncture and seed placement, and the quantitative decision making regarding radiological parameters by radiation oncologists. The combined use of LDR brachytherapy with other therapeutic modalities, such as external beam radiation and androgen deprivation therapy, for the clinical risk classification of PCa has led to better anticancer treatment efficacy. In this study, we summarized basic LDR brachytherapy findings that should remain unchanged and be passed down in urology departments. We also discussed the applications of LDR brachytherapy for PCa in various clinical settings, including focal and salvage therapies. In addition, we highlighted technologies associated with brachytherapy that are under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manabu Kato
- Aichi Cancer Center, Urology, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan; (S.T.); (G.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.)
| | - Shinichiro Higashi
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514-0001, Japan; (S.H.); (Y.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.)
| | - Yusuke Sugino
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514-0001, Japan; (S.H.); (Y.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.)
| | - Shinya Kajiwara
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514-0001, Japan; (S.H.); (Y.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.)
| | - Shiori Tanaka
- Aichi Cancer Center, Urology, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan; (S.T.); (G.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.)
| | - Goshi Kitano
- Aichi Cancer Center, Urology, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan; (S.T.); (G.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.)
| | | | - Yuji Ogura
- Kuwana City Medical Center, Urology, Kuwana 511-0061, Japan;
| | - Hiroyuki Tachibana
- Aichi Cancer Center, Urology, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan; (S.T.); (G.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.)
| | - Takahiro Kojima
- Aichi Cancer Center, Urology, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan; (S.T.); (G.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.)
| | - Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu 514-0001, Japan; (S.H.); (Y.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abdelhakiem MK, Keller A, Bajpai RR, Smith RP, Beriwal S, Benoit R. Cs-131 prostate brachytherapy boost and effect of hydrogel rectal spacer on long-term patient-reported rectal bleeding and bowel quality of life. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:808-821. [PMID: 37648596 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluates long-term patient-reported bowel quality of life (QOL), rectal bleeding, and bleeding bother in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and Cesium-131 LDR brachytherapy (LDR-BT) boost with and without hydrogel rectal spacer. METHODS AND MATERIALS This is a retrospective analysis of prostate cancer patients treated between 2007 and 2022 with 45 Gy EBRT followed by 85 Gy Cs-131 LDR-BT boost with or without hydrogel rectal spacer. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) QOL questionnaires pre-treatment and at each follow-up were collected. Patient-reported rectal bleeding occurring more than "rarely" and bother from rectal bleeding occurring more than a "very small problem" were deemed clinically significant. Fisher's exact test was used to test the association of rectal spacer use and the incidence of clinically significant rectal bleeding and bleeding bother. Paired samples t-test was used to analyze mean bowel scores at each time point. RESULTS Three hundred and forty-one patients were included in the analysis. The rectal spacer was used in 108 patients. Overall median follow-up was 48 months (IQR, 24-72), with a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR, 12-37.5) for the hydrogel group and 60 months (IQR, 36-84) for the non-hydrogel group. EPIC questionnaire response rates at median follow-up were 33% and 37% for the hydrogel and non-hydrogel groups, respectively. A clinically significant decrease in mean bowel domain scores was seen in the bowel bother domain at 6 and 12 months for patients who did not receive a rectal spacer. At the last follow-up of 60 months, the prevalence of clinically significant rectal bleeding and bleeding bother were 2.2% and 2.2%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of clinically significant long-term rectal bleeding was 2.8% and 18.9% in the hydrogel group and non-hydrogel group, respectively (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of clinically significant long-term bowel bother was 4.6% and 19.7% in the hydrogel group and non-hydrogel group, respectively (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Use of hydrogel rectal spacer with EBRT and Cs-131 LDR-BT boost was significantly associated with a lower incidence of patient-reported rectal bleeding and bother from rectal bleeding, and better long-term bowel QOL. Cumulative incidence was 2.8% (hydrogel group) versus 18.9% (non-hydrogel group) and 4.6% (hydrogel group) versus 19.7% (non-hydrogel group) for clinically significant long-term rectal bleeding and long-term bleeding bother, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Keller
- Radiation Oncology, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL
| | - Rajesh R Bajpai
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ryan P Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AHN Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Varian Medical Systems, Charlottesville, VA.
| | - Ronald Benoit
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Morita M. Editorial Comment to Bladder stone formation around polyethylene glycol after use of SpaceOAR hydrogel. IJU Case Rep 2023; 6:356. [PMID: 37928282 PMCID: PMC10622213 DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Morita
- Department of UrologyShowa University Koto Toyosu HospitalTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Narukawa T, Aibe N, Tsujimoto M, Shiraishi T, Kimoto T, Suzuki G, Ueda T, Fujihara A, Yamazaki H, Ukimura O. Increasing rectum-prostate distance using a hydrogel spacer to reduce radiation exposure during proton beam therapy for prostate cancer. Sci Rep 2023; 13:18319. [PMID: 37884786 PMCID: PMC10603046 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45557-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
SpaceOAR, a polyethylene-glycol hydrogel, reduces rectal radiation exposure during radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Previously, our group reported the modified technique of hydrogel insertion, which achieves greater separated distance at prostate-apex. This study aimed to investigate the impact of separated distance at prostate-apex and our modifier technique, on radiation exposure reduction during proton beam therapy (PBT). We included 330 patients undergoing PBT with the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 63 Gray (Gy) for localized prostate cancer, and categorized them into groups 0 (no spacer, n = 141), 1 (separated distance of spacer at the prostate-apex level < 7.5 mm, n = 81), and 2 (distance ≥ 7.5 mm, n = 108). The rectal volumes to receive 30-60 Gy (RBE), was estimated and described as Rectal V30-60 (ml) in 10 Gy increments. The Rectal V30-60 (ml) was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1, and in group 1 than in group 0. After propensity score matching, the multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the most significant factor to reduce radiation exposure was our modified technique of hydrogel insertion. Therefore, using a hydrogel spacer to expand the prostate-rectum distance not only at prostate-mid to prostate-base level but also at the prostate-apex level can reduce the radiation exposure in PBT for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsukasa Narukawa
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Masashi Tsujimoto
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Takumi Shiraishi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Takuya Kimoto
- Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Gen Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Takashi Ueda
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Atsuko Fujihara
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Osamu Ukimura
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji 465, Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Smart AC, Liu KX, Domogauer JD, Rodriguez-Russo C, Jones B, Dickstein DR, Mancias JD, Shiloh RY, Wintner A, Zietman AL, Marshall DC, Dyer MA, Russo AL. Gender-Affirming Surgery and Cancer: Considerations for Radiation Oncologists for Pelvic Radiation in Transfeminine Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:301-311. [PMID: 37230432 PMCID: PMC10527783 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Access to gender-affirming surgery is increasing for many transgender and nonbinary people in the United States, and radiation oncologists must be equipped to care for patients who have undergone such surgery in the region of their planned radiation treatment field. There are no guidelines for radiation treatment planning after gender-affirming surgery, and most oncologists do not receive training in the unique needs of transgender people with cancer. We review common gender-affirming genitopelvic surgeries for transfeminine people, including vaginoplasty, labiaplasty, and orchiectomy, and summarize the existing literature on the treatment of cancers of the neovagina, anus, rectum, prostate, and bladder in these patients. We also describe our systematic treatment approach and rationale for pelvic radiation treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia C Smart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Kevin X Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason D Domogauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Carlos Rodriguez-Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Brianna Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Joseph D Mancias
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ron Y Shiloh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anton Wintner
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anthony L Zietman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah C Marshall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - M Aiven Dyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrea L Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kejda A, Bromley R, Bell L, Stewart M, Kneebone A, Eade T, Hruby G. Radiological evaluation of an iodised hydrogel for prostate radiotherapy applications. Phys Med 2023; 114:103155. [PMID: 37776699 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Physical separation of healthy tissue and target volumes in prostate radiotherapy through the insertion of hydrogel can improve patient toxicity rates. An iodised hydrogel may provide anatomical separation of prostate and rectum while being easily visualised through radio-opacity. The aim of this study was to characterise SpaceOAR Vue™ in kilovoltage (kV) images and megavoltage (MV) radiotherapy treatment planning. METHODS Two cassettes were 3D-printed, one filled with water and the other with SpaceOAR Vue™. Transmission dose through each cassette was measured in slab phantom geometry and compared for 6MV and 10MV photon energies. The SpaceOAR Vue™ slab phantom setup was simulated using computed tomography (CT) and a treatment plan created. The plan was calculated with the hydrogel segmented and material assignment set to water, and the resultant dose compared to corresponding measurement doses. The first 5 patients treated with SpaceOAR Vue™ were assessed with the volume and Hounsfield units (HU) of the hydrogel evaluated in CT and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. RESULTS Transmission through Water and SpaceOAR Vue™ agreed to within 0.5% for both photon energies. Furthermore, the segmentation of SpaceOAR Vue™ and material assignment to water, resulted in a plan dose that agreed to measurement to within 0.5%. Clinically, the SpaceOAR Vue™ volume and HU did not vary over patient treatment course, however was found to display differently on different kV imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS SpaceOAR Vue™ was found to be radio-opaque on kV images, but dosimetrically behaved similarly to water in MV treatment beams, making it suitable for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alannah Kejda
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Regina Bromley
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Linda Bell
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maegan Stewart
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew Kneebone
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Eade
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - George Hruby
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kos M, Nurani R, Costa P, Dabkowski M, da Silva JVF, Zimberg S, Keane J. Multicenter, dual fractionation scheme, single core lab comparison of rectal volume dose reduction following injection of two biodegradable perirectal spacers. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14086. [PMID: 37376868 PMCID: PMC10562021 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A multicenter, double-arm, central core lab, retrospective study was performed to compare the rectal dosimetry of patients implanted with two injectable, biodegradable perirectal spacers, in conventional fractionation (CF), as well as ultrahypofractionation (UH) treatment plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty-nine patients were enrolled into the study in five centers: two centers in Europe, which implanted a biodegradable balloon spacer in a total of 24 subjects and three centers in the US, which implanted the SpaceOAR in 35 subjects. Anonymized CTs (pre and post-implantation) were reviewed by the central core lab. For VMAT CF plans rectal V50, V60, V70, and V80 were calculated. For UH plans, a corresponding rectal V22.6, V27.1, V31.37, and V36.25 were established representing 62.5%, 75%, 87.5%, and 100% of the 36.25 Gy prescribed dose. RESULTS For CF VMAT, a comparison between the balloon spacer and the SpaceOAR revealed a significant difference of 33.4% decrease in mean rectal V50 (71.9% vs. 38.5%, p < 0.001), 27.7% in mean rectal V60 (79.6% vs. 51.9%, p < 0.001), 17.1% difference in mean rectal V70 (84.1% vs. 67.0%, p = 0.001), and a significant difference of 3.0% (p = 0.019) in mean rectal V80 (87.2% vs. 84.2%). With UH analysis, the mean rectal dose reduction for the balloon spacer compared to the SpaceOAR was 79.2% and 53.3% for V27.1 (p < 0.001), 84.1% and 68.1% for V31.71 (p = 0.001), and 89.7% and 84.8% for V36.25 (p = 0.012), respectively. CONCLUSION Rectal dosimetry is more favorable for treatment with the balloon spacer compared with SpaceOAR. Further research, particularly in the context of a prospective randomized clinical trial design, is needed to assess the acute and late toxicity experience as well as physician satisfaction with achieving symmetrical implantation, and ease of use in light of increasing clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kos
- Northern NV Radiation OncologySpokaneWashingtonUSA
| | | | - Paulo Costa
- CUF Porto InstitutoRua Fonte das Sete BicasPortoPortugal
| | | | | | - Shawn Zimberg
- Advanced Radiation Centers of New YorkLake SuccessNew YorkUSA
| | - John Keane
- Advanced Radiation Centers of New YorkLake SuccessNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Takayesu JSK, Heckman P, Short E, Hurley P, Narayana V, McLaughlin PW. Quality rectal hydrogel placement allows for gel-enabled dose-escalated EBRT (GEDE-EBRT) without rectal interference in prostate cancer. Med Dosim 2023; 48:286-292. [PMID: 37666707 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
Multiple trials have shown that dose-escalation of radiation for prostate cancer provides a biochemical progression-free survival benefit (bPFS); however, rectal constraints are often limiting. In this dosimetric study, we hypothesized that a well-placed rectal hydrogel (RH) would permit improved dose-escalation and target coverage. We selected patients with good-quality RH and created plans with and without RH, prescribing 70 Gy in 28 fractions to the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles (PSV), and a peripheral zone (PZ) boost to 84 Gy, 98 Gy, or 112 Gy. We then compared plans with and without RH, prescribing a 112 Gy boost to 1 to 2 cm simulated dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL). In the 18 plans created with a PZ boost, the PTV_boost D95% was higher in RH plans compared to non-RH plans (median 98.5 Gy vs 75.53 Gy, p < 0.01). The PSV planning target volume (PTV_PSV) D95% was also marginally higher with RH (71.87 Gy vs 71.04 Gy, p < 0.01). All rectal metrics were improved with RH. For the 32 plans created for simulated DILs treated to 112 Gy, the PTV_boost coverage (median D95% 112.48 Gy vs 102.63 Gy, p < 0.01) and rectal metrics were improved with RH. Four non-RH plans with at least a 4 mm rectal-PTV_boost gap achieved D95% > 98% of the prescription dose for the PTV_boost. Our study showed that placement of a high-quality RH allowed for GEDE-EBRT up to 112 Gy in 28 fractions (EQD2 160 Gy with α/β = 2.5). This concept should be tested prospectively, particularly to assess for increases in nonrectal toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie S K Takayesu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Paul Heckman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Assarian Cancer Center, Ascension Providence Hospital, Novi, MI, USA
| | - Eric Short
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Assarian Cancer Center, Ascension Providence Hospital, Novi, MI, USA
| | - Patrick Hurley
- Department of Urology, Ascension Providence Hospital, Novi, MI, USA
| | - Vrinda Narayana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lee CT, Koleoso O, Deng M, Veltchev I, Lin T, Hallman MA, Horwitz EM, Wong JK. A dosimetric analysis of rectal hydrogel spacer use in patients with recurrent prostate cancer undergoing salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:586-592. [PMID: 37393186 PMCID: PMC10527788 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We hypothesize rectal hydrogel spacer (RHS) improves rectal dosimetry in patients undergoing salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for intact, recurrent prostate cancer (PC). METHODS AND MATERIALS A prospectively collected institutional database was queried for recurrent PC patients treated with salvage HDR-BT from September 2015 to November 2021. Patients were offered RHS beginning June 2019. Dosimetric variables were compared between RHS and no-RHS groups for the average of two fractions using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Primary outcomes were rectal volume receiving 75% of prescription dose (V75%) and prostate volume receiving 100% of prescription dose (V100%). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was used to evaluate the association between other planning variables and rectal V75%. RESULTS Forty-one PC patients received salvage HDR-BT, of whom 20 had RHS. All patients received 2400cGy in 2 fractions. Median RHS volume was 6.2cm3 (Standard deviation [SD]: ± 3.5cm3). Median follow-up was 4 months and 17 months in the RHS and no-RHS groups, respectively. Median rectal V75% with and without RHS were 0.0cm3 (IQR: 0.0-0.0cm3) and 0.06cm3 (IQR: 0.0-0.14cm3), respectively (p<0.001). Median prostate V100% with and without RHS were 98.55% (IQR: 97.86-99.22%) and 97.78% (IQR: 97.50-98.18%), respectively (p = 0.007). RHS, rectum, and prostate volumes did not significantly affect rectal V75% per GEE modeling. There was 10% G1-2 and 5% G3 rectal toxicity in RHS group. There was 9.5% G1-2 and no G3+ rectal toxicities in the no-RHS group. CONCLUSIONS Absolute improvement in rectal V75% and prostate V100% was significant with RHS in PC patients undergoing salvage HDR-BT, but clinical benefit is marginal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles T Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Olufela Koleoso
- Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine Program, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mengying Deng
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Iavor Veltchev
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Teh Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark A Hallman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eric M Horwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - J Karen Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Muramoto Y, Murakami N, Karino T, Sugimoto S, Takatsu J, Oshima M, Kosugi Y, Kawamoto T, Hirayama T, Fujino K, Terao Y, Shikama N. MucoUp® as a spacer in brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: A first-in-human experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 42:100659. [PMID: 37519921 PMCID: PMC10372547 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We first used MucoUp®, a hyaluronic acid used in endoscopic resection, as a spacer in brachytherapy. In five cervical cancer patients, MucoUp® insertion increased a 90% dose of the high-risk CTV to over 80 Gy while decreasing the dose of organs at risk. No related adverse events were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi Muramoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| | - Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| | - Tatsuki Karino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| | - Satoru Sugimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| | - Jun Takatsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| | - Masaki Oshima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| | - Yasuo Kosugi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| | - Terufumi Kawamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| | - Takashi Hirayama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| | - Kazunari Fujino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Terao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| | - Naoto Shikama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Hospital, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tanaka N. The oncologic and safety outcomes of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. Prostate Int 2023; 11:127-133. [PMID: 37745911 PMCID: PMC10513906 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Around 40 years have passed since a modern low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer was introduced. LDR brachytherapy has become one of the definitive treatment options besides radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). LDR brachytherapy has several advantages over EBRT such as a higher prescribed dose to the prostate gland while avoiding unnecessary irradiation of organs at risk, a precipitous dose gradient, a brief treatment time, and a short hospital stay. Previous reports revealed that the long-term oncologic outcomes of LDR brachytherapy are superior to those of EBRT. The oncologic outcomes of low- to intermediate-risk patients are equivalent to those of RP using the recurrence definition of surgery of prostate specific antigen (PSA) >0.2 ng/mL, while the oncologic outcomes of LDR brachytherapy as tri-modality (combined EBRT and androgen deprivation therapy) for high-risk patients is superior to that of RP using the recurrence definition of surgery. In respect of toxicity, urinary disorders such as urgency and frequency are often observed after the acute phase of treatment, but these events usually resolve, while the quality of life of urinary continence is well preserved for a long time. Erectile function decreases yearly, but is relatively preserved compared to RP. In conclusion, the most noteworthy strength of LDR brachytherapy for low- to intermediate-risk patients is the "brief treatment time" that provides long recurrence-free survival, while that for high-risk patients who received LDR brachytherapy (tri-modality) is "excellent disease control."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobumichi Tanaka
- Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Japan
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Murakami N, Terao Y, Shikama N. In Regard to Vittrup et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:963-964. [PMID: 37355313 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Terao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoto Shikama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Fredman E, Weinstock-Sabbah M, Icht O, Moore A, Shochet T, Limon D, Bragilovski D. Same-day versus delayed simulation imaging after placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer for prostate radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1236113. [PMID: 37519789 PMCID: PMC10375909 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1236113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of rectal toxicity from prostate radiation. Practices vary regarding the timing of CT simulation after hydrogel placement, and the ideal schedule remains unknown. Methods Thirty patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided placement of an iodinated SpaceOAR™ hydrogel prior to radiotherapy. Per evolving practice, 15 completed same-day simulation and 15 returned for simulation 1-2 weeks later. Hydrogel volume, perirectal distance, air-void volume, and rectal dosimetry per NRG GU005 were compared between CT simulation, 1st fraction Cone-Beam-CT (CBCT), and final CBCT. Results CT simulation occurred 8.8 ± 2.4 days after placement in the delayed group, with no significant difference in the interval between simulation and 1st fraction between groups (p = 0.165). Greater observed de-creases in hydrogel volume (0.57 cc vs. 0.04 cc, p = 0.0002), and perirectal distance at both mid-gland (1.32 mm vs. 0.17 mm) and tallest point (2.40 mm vs. 0.04 mm) were seen on 1st-fraction CBCT in the same-day group (p = 0.0039; p = 0.0002). Per dosimetry recalculated on 1st fraction CBCT, five (D3 cc and D50%) versus one (D50%) rectal dose parameters were exceeded in the same-day and delayed groups, respectively, and 10 versus one parameters had a relative increase of ≥ 20%. Conclusion Due to the evolving anatomic changes in the days following hydrogel placement, same-day simulation scanning may introduce unintended variability in rectal dosimetry at the time of prostate radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisha Fredman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Miriam Weinstock-Sabbah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Oded Icht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Assaf Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Tzippora Shochet
- Department of Biostatistics, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dror Limon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | - Dimitri Bragilovski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dal Pra A, Dirix P, Khoo V, Carrie C, Cozzarini C, Fonteyne V, Ghadjar P, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Panebianco V, Zapatero A, Bossi A, Wiegel T. ESTRO ACROP guideline on prostate bed delineation for postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100638. [PMID: 37251620 PMCID: PMC10209331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective Radiotherapy to the prostate bed is a potentially curative salvage option after radical prostatectomy. Although prostate bed contouring guidelines are available in the literature, important variabilities exist. The objective of this work is to provide a contemporary consensus guideline for prostate bed delineation for postoperative radiotherapy. Methods An ESTRO-ACROP contouring consensus panel consisting of 11 radiation oncologists and one radiologist, all with known subspecialty expertise in prostate cancer, was established. Participants were asked to delineate the prostate bed clinical target volumes (CTVs) in 3 separate clinically relevant scenarios: adjuvant radiation, salvage radiation with PSA progression, and salvage radiation with persistently elevated PSA. These cases focused on the presence of positive surgical margin, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicles involvement. None of the cases had radiographic evidence of local recurrence on imaging. A single computed tomography (CT) dataset was shared via FALCON platform and contours were performed using EduCaseTM software. Contours were analyzed qualitatively using heatmaps which provided a visual assessment of controversial regions and quantitatively analyzed using Sorensen-Dice similarity coefficients. Participants also answered case-specific questionnaires addressing detailed recommendations on target delineation. Discussions via electronic mails and videoconferences for final editing and consensus were performed. Results The mean CTV for the adjuvant case was 76 cc (SD = 26.6), salvage radiation with PSA progression was 51.80 cc (SD = 22.7), and salvage radiation with persistently elevated PSA 57.63 cc (SD = 25.2). Compared to the median, the mean Sorensen-Dice similarity coefficient for the adjuvant case was 0.60 (SD 0.10), salvage radiation with PSA progression was 0.58 (SD = 0.12), and salvage radiation with persistently elevated PSA 0.60 (SD = 0.11). A heatmap for each clinical scenario was generated. The group agreed to proceed with a uniform recommendation for all cases, independent of the radiotherapy timing. Several controversial areas of the prostate bed CTV were identified based on both heatmaps and questionnaires. This formed the basis for discussions via videoconferences where the panel achieved consensus on the prostate bed CTV to be used as a novel guideline for postoperative prostate cancer radiotherapy. Conclusion Variability was observed in a group formed by experienced genitourinary radiation oncologists and a radiologist. A single contemporary ESTRO-ACROP consensus guideline was developed to address areas of dissonance and improve consistency in prostate bed delineation, independent of the indication.There is important variability in existing contouring guidelines for postoperative prostate bed (PB) radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy. This work aimed at providing a contemporary consensus guideline for PB delineation. An ESTRO ACROP consensus panel including radiation oncologists and a radiologist, all with known subspecialty expertise in prostate cancer, delineated the PB CTV in 3 scenarios: adjuvant RT, salvage RT with PSA progression, and salvage RT with persistently elevated PSA. None of the cases had evidence of local recurrence. Contours were analysed qualitatively using heatmaps for visual assessment of controversial regions and quantitatively using Sorensen-Dice coefficient. Case-specific questionnaires were also discussed via e-mails and videoconferences for consensus. Several controversial areas of the PB CTV were identified based on both heatmaps and questionnaires. This formed the basis for discussions via videoconferences. Finally, a contemporary ESTRO-ACROP consensus guideline was developed to address areas of dissonance and improve consistency in PB delineation, independent of the indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
- University of Bern, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Cesare Cozzarini
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- Radiation Oncology, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria IP, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Radiation Oncology, Centre Charlebourg, La Garenne Colombe, France
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Krcek R, Shelan M. [Hyaluronic acid spacers for optimizing rectal dose in hypofractionated radiotherapy of the prostate]. Strahlenther Onkol 2023:10.1007/s00066-023-02088-4. [PMID: 37157028 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02088-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Reinhardt Krcek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Omer DM, Thompson HM, Verheij FS, Yuval JB, Rosen R, Beets NRA, Luthra A, Romesser PB, Paty PB, Garcia-Aguilar J, Sanchez-Vega F. Rectal Cancer after Prostate Radiation: A Complex and Controversial Disease. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082214. [PMID: 37190143 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
A small proportion of rectal adenocarcinomas develop in patients many years after the treatment of a previous cancer using pelvic radiation, and the incidence of these rectal cancers depends on the length of follow-up from the end of radiotherapy. The risk of radiation-associated rectal cancer (RARC) is higher in patients treated with prostate external beam radiotherapy than it is in patients treated with brachytherapy. The molecular features of RARC have not been fully investigated, and survival is lower compared to non-irradiated rectal cancer patients. Ultimately, it is unclear whether the worse outcomes are related to differences in patient characteristics, treatment-related factors, or tumor biology. Radiation is widely used in the management of rectal adenocarcinoma; however, pelvic re-irradiation of RARC is challenging and carries a higher risk of treatment complications. Although RARC can develop in patients treated for a variety of malignancies, it is most common in patients treated for prostate cancer. This study will review the incidence, molecular characteristics, clinical course, and treatment outcomes of rectal adenocarcinoma in patients previously treated with radiation for prostate cancer. For clarity, we will distinguish between rectal cancer not associated with prostate cancer (RCNAPC), rectal cancer in non-irradiated prostate cancer patients (RCNRPC), and rectal cancer in irradiated prostate cancer patients (RCRPC). RARC represents a unique but understudied subset of rectal cancer, and thus requires a more comprehensive investigation in order to improve its treatment and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana M Omer
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Hannah M Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Floris S Verheij
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jonathan B Yuval
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Roni Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Nathalie R A Beets
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Anisha Luthra
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Philip B Paty
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Francisco Sanchez-Vega
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mariados NF, Orio PF, Schiffman Z, Van TJ, Engelman A, Nurani R, Kurtzman SM, Lopez E, Chao M, Boike TP, Martinez AA, Gejerman G, Lederer J, Sylvester JE, Bell G, Rivera D, Shore N, Miller K, Sinayuk B, Steinberg ML, Low DA, Kishan AU, King MT. Hyaluronic Acid Spacer for Hypofractionated Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:511-518. [PMID: 36757690 PMCID: PMC9912169 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer has been associated with greater acute grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxic effects compared with conventionally fractionated RT. Objective To evaluate whether a hyaluronic acid rectal spacer could (1) improve rectal dosimetry and (2) affect acute grade 2 or higher GI toxic effects for hypofractionated RT. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 2020 to June 2021 among 12 centers within the US, Australia, and Spain, with a 6-month follow-up. Adult patients with biopsy-proven, T1 to T2 prostate cancer with a Gleason score 7 or less and prostate-specific antigen level of 20 ng/mL or less (to convert to μg/L, multiply by 1) were blinded to the treatment arms. Of the 260 consented patients, 201 patients (77.3%) were randomized (2:1) to the presence or absence of the spacer. Patients were stratified by intended 4-month androgen deprivation therapy use and erectile quality. Main Outcomes and Measures For the primary outcome, we hypothesized that more than 70% of patients in the spacer group would achieve a 25% or greater reduction in the rectal volume receiving 54 Gy (V54). For the secondary outcome, we hypothesized that the spacer group would have noninferior acute (within 3 months) grade 2 or higher GI toxic effects compared with the control group, with a margin of 10%. Results Of the 201 randomized patients, 8 (4.0%) were Asian, 26 (12.9%) Black, 42 (20.9%) Hispanic or Latino, and 153 (76.1%) White; the mean (SD) age for the spacer group was 68.6 (7.2) years and 68.4 (7.3) years for the control group. For the primary outcome, 131 of 133 (98.5%; 95% CI, 94.7%-99.8%) patients in the spacer group experienced a 25% or greater reduction in rectum V54, which was greater than the minimally acceptable 70% (P < .001). The mean (SD) reduction was 85.0% (20.9%). For the secondary outcome, 4 of 136 patients (2.9%) in the spacer group and 9 of 65 patients (13.8%) in the control group experienced acute grade 2 or higher GI toxic effects (difference, -10.9%; 95% 1-sided upper confidence limit, -3.5; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance The trial results suggest that rectal spacing with hyaluronic acid improved rectal dosimetry and reduced acute grade 2 or higher GI toxic effects. Rectal spacing should potentially be considered for minimizing the risk of acute grade 2 or higher toxic effects for hypofractionated RT. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04189913.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter F Orio
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Rizwan Nurani
- Western Radiation Oncology, Campbell, California
- Interventional Radiation Oncology of California, Campbell
| | | | - Escarlata Lopez
- Vithas La Milagrosa Hospital, Calle de Modesto Lafuente, Madrid, Spain
| | - Michael Chao
- Ringwood Private Hospital, East Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Martin T King
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Labate C, Panunzio A, De Carlo F, Zacheo F, De Matteis S, Barba MC, Carbonara U, Rizzo FL, Leo S, Forte S, Ditonno P, Tafuri A, Pagliarulo V. Current Knowledge on Radiation-Therapy-Induced Erectile Dysfunction in Prostate-Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review. URO 2023. [DOI: 10.3390/uro3020013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men in the United States. Among the different available treatment options, radiation therapy is recommended for localized or even advanced disease. Erectile dysfunction (ED) often occurs after radiation therapy due to neurological, vascular, and endocrine mechanisms resulting in arterial tone alteration, pudendal-nerve neuropraxia, and lastly fibrosis. Considering the influence of quality of life on patients’ treatment choice, radiation-therapy-induced ED prevention and treatment are major issues. In this narrative review, we briefly summarize and discuss the current state of the art on radiation-therapy-induced ED in PCa patients in terms of pathophysiology and available treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connie Labate
- Department of Urology, “Vito Fazzi” Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology and Andrology Section, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, “Vito Fazzi” Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy
| | | | - Federico Zacheo
- Department of Urology, “Vito Fazzi” Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy
| | - Sara De Matteis
- Department of Radiation Therapy, “Vito Fazzi” Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy
| | | | - Umberto Carbonara
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology and Andrology Section, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Trust, London NW3 2PS, UK
| | | | - Silvana Leo
- Department of Oncology, “Vito Fazzi” Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy
| | - Saverio Forte
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology and Andrology Section, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Ditonno
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology and Andrology Section, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wegener E, Samuels J, Sidhom M, Trada Y, Sridharan S, Dickson S, McLeod N, Martin JM. Virtual HDR Boost for Prostate Cancer: Rebooting a Classic Treatment Using Modern Tech. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072018. [PMID: 37046680 PMCID: PMC10093761 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common malignancy in men. Internal radiotherapy (brachytherapy) has been used to treat PC successfully for over a century. In particular, there is level-one evidence of the benefits of using brachytherapy to escalate the dose of radiotherapy compared with standard external beam radiotherapy approaches. However, the use of PC brachytherapy is declining, despite strong evidence for its improved cancer outcomes. A method using external beam radiotherapy known as virtual high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (vHDRB) aims to noninvasively mimic a brachytherapy boost radiation dose plan. In this review, we consider the evidence supporting brachytherapy boosts for PC and the continuing evolution of vHDRB approaches, culminating in the current generation of clinical trials, which will help define the role of this emerging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Wegener
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
- GenesisCare, Maitland, NSW 2323, Australia
- GenesisCare, Gateshead, NSW 2290, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Justin Samuels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
| | - Mark Sidhom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Yuvnik Trada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
| | - Swetha Sridharan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
- GenesisCare, Gateshead, NSW 2290, Australia
| | - Samuel Dickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
| | - Nicholas McLeod
- Department of Urology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia
| | - Jarad M. Martin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
- GenesisCare, Maitland, NSW 2323, Australia
- GenesisCare, Gateshead, NSW 2290, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nakai Y, Tanaka N, Asakawa I, Hori S, Miyake M, Yamaki K, Anai S, Torimoto K, Inoue T, Hasegawa M, Fujimoto K. Quality of life in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with those who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Prostate 2023; 83:701-712. [PMID: 36879383 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the quality of life (QOL) in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for prostate cancer. METHODS We enrolled patients who underwent LDR-BT (LDR-BT alone [n = 540] or LDR-BT plus external beam radiation therapy [n = 428]) and RARP (n = 142). QOL was evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), and 8-item Short Form (SF-8) health survey. The two groups were compared using propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS At 24 months after treatment, the number of patients with worsened urinary QOL in the urinary domain of EPIC compared with baseline was 78/111 (70%) and 63/137 (46%) in the RARP and LDR-BT groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In the urinary incontinence and function domain, this number was higher in the RARP group versus the LDR-BT group. However, in the urinary irritative/obstructive domain, the number of patients with improved urinary QOL at 24 months compared with baseline was 18/111 (16%) and 9/137 (7%), respectively (p = 0.01). Regarding the SHIM score, sexual domain of EPIC, and mental component summary of SF-8, there were more number of patients with worsened QOL in the RARP group than in the LDR-BT group. In the EPIC bowel domain, the number of patients with worsened QOL was lower in the RARP group versus the LDR-BT group. CONCLUSION The differences in QOL observed between patients treated with RARP and LDR-BT could assist in treatment selection for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasushi Nakai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Nobumichi Tanaka
- Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Isao Asakawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Shunta Hori
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kaori Yamaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Satoshi Anai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Torimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Takeshi Inoue
- Department of Urology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Hasegawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Harvey M, Ong WL, Chao M, Udovicich C, McBride S, Bolton D, Eastham J, Perera M. Comprehensive review of the use of hydrogel spacers prior to radiation therapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2023; 131:280-287. [PMID: 35689413 PMCID: PMC9734283 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide a comprehensive narrative review of the published data on the impact of hydrogel spacers on rectal dosimetry and toxicity and to outline the practicalities of inserting hydrogel spacers. RESULTS A growing body of evidence suggests that the administration of hydrogel spacers is safe and is associated with limited peri-operative morbidity. The impact on rectal dosimetry has been clearly established and use of hydrogel spacers is associated with reduced rectal morbidity. These results have been corroborated by several Phase II and III clinical trials and subsequent meta-analysis. There are several areas for future research, including the role of hydrogel spacers in prostate stereotactic beam radiotherapy and post-radiotherapy local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Hydrogel spacers provide a low-morbidity method to potential reduce rectal toxicity after radiation therapy in men with prostate cancer. Data outlining sexual function and oncological outcomes are limited to date. Future studies, currently being conducted, may provide further clarification of the role of hydrogel spacers in prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Harvey
- Urology Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
| | - Wee Loon Ong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, 3004, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3000 Victoria
| | - Michael Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
- Genesis Cancer Care Victoria, Ringwood East, Victoria 3135, Australia
| | - Cristian Udovicich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Sean McBride
- Radiation Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Damien Bolton
- Urology Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
| | - James Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Marlon Perera
- Urology Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Huang S, Zhong Z, Pang Y, Zheng W, Liu Y, He M, He L, Yang X. Validation of bowel and bladder preparation by rectum and bladder variation in prostate radiotherapy based on cone beam CTs. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jrras.2022.100513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
49
|
Repka MC, Carrasquilla M, Paydar I, Wu B, Lei S, Suy S, Collins SP, Kole TP. Dosimetric predictors of acute bowel toxicity after Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:174-179. [PMID: 36826994 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2180661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION SBRT is an increasingly popular treatment for localized prostate cancer, though considerable variation in technical approach is common and optimal dose constraints are uncertain. In this study, we sought to identify dosimetric and patient-related predictors of acute rectal toxicity. METHODS Patients included in this study were treated with prostate SBRT on a prospective institutional protocol. Physician-graded toxicity and patient-reported outcomes were captured at one week, one month, and three months following SBRT. DVH data were extracted and converted into relative volume differential DVHs for NTCP modeling. Patient- and disease-related covariates along with NTCP model predictions were independently tested for significant association with physician-graded toxicity or a decline in bowel-related QoL. A multivariate model was constructed using forward selection, and significant parameter cutoff values were obtained with Fischer's exact test to group patients by risk of developing physician-graded toxicity or detriments in patient-reported QoL. RESULTS One hundred and three patients treated for localized prostate cancer with SBRT were included in our analysis. 52% of patients experienced a clinically significant decline in bowel-related QOL within 1 week of completion of treatment, while only 27.5% of patients developed grade 2+ physician-graded rectal toxicity. Sequential feature selection multivariate logistic regression identified rectal V22.5 Gy (p = 0.001) and D19% (p = 0.001) as independent predictors of clinically significant toxicity, while rectal V20Gy (p = 0.004) and D25.3% (p = 0.007) were independently correlated with physician-graded toxicity. Global multivariate step-wise logistic regression identified only D19% (p = 0.001) and V20Gy (p = 0.004) as independent predictors of acute bowel bother or physician-graded rectal toxicity respectively. CONCLUSIONS Moderate doses to large rectal volumes, D19% and V20Gy, were associated with an increased incidence of a clinically significant decrease in patient-reported bowel QOL and physician-scored grade 2+ rectal toxicity, respectively. These dosimetric parameters may help practitioners mitigate acute toxicity in patients treated with prostate SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Repka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michael Carrasquilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Binbin Wu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Siyuan Lei
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Thomas P Kole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Valley Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Care, Paramus, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
AUA/ASTRO 2022 Guidelines: "Scrutinized". Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:172-174. [PMID: 36882350 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|