Management Trends and Outcomes for Stage I to II Mantle Cell Lymphoma Using the National Cancer Data Base: Ascertaining the Ideal Treatment Paradigm

Extranodal Head and Neck Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival

OBJECTIVES

To describe disease characteristics and treatment and to analyze survival and mortality for extranodal mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) of the head and neck.

METHODS

Patients with extranodal MCL-excluding primary sites in the salivary glands, eye, and adnexa-were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 Registries (2000-2015). Overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of MCL and non-MCL mortality were calculated. Factors associated with MCL and non-MCL mortality were analyzed with cause-specific hazard models.

RESULTS

Five hundred nine patients met criteria for descriptive analysis and 294 patients met criteria for survival analysis, with a median follow-up of 58 months. The most common sites for MCL were the oropharynx (66.0%), nasopharynx (19.1%), and oral cavity (8.4%). The most common treatment received was chemotherapy alone (48.9%), followed by chemoradiation therapy (16.9%), and radiation therapy alone (10.4%). The proportion of cases diagnosed as early-stage disease ranged from 31% of sinonasal MCLs to 83% of laryngeal MCLs. At 5 years, OS was 63% (95% CI: 57%-69%). There was no significant difference in OS (P = .79), cumulative incidence of MCL mortality (P = .76), or cumulative incidence of non-MCL mortality (P = .98) by anatomic site. Comparing early-stage to late-stage disease, there was no significant difference in OS (P = .38), cumulative incidence of MCL mortality (P = .07), or cumulative incidence of non-MCL mortality (P = .14). Multivariate analysis showed increased hazard of MCL mortality for patients that were older or that presented with stage III or stage IV disease.

CONCLUSION

The oropharynx is the most common subsite of head and neck MCLs, followed by the nasopharynx. Primary head and neck MCLs appear to present at an earlier stage than MCLs of other regions. In particular, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal MCLs may present as stage I or II disease.

Is Limited-Stage Mantle Cell Lymphoma Curable and How Is It Best Managed?

Limited-stage (stage I-II) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is rarely encountered. There is no standard approach to treatment and available data to guide management decisions mainly are retrospective studies. A thorough staging evaluation, including positron emission tomography/computed tomography, bone marrow biopsy, and gastrointestinal evaluation, should be completed because disseminated disease is common. Radiation therapy is effective for local control, and, although prolonged remission can be achieved, distant relapses are common and there are insufficient data to say that patients can be cured using this treatment. This article reviews literature pertaining to management of patients with limited-stage MCL and discusses approach to treatment.

Mantle cell lymphoma

MCL is a well-characterized generally aggressive lymphoma with a poor prognosis. However, patients with a more indolent disease have been reported in whom the initiation of therapy can be delayed without any consequence for the survival. In 2017 the World Health Organization updated the classification of MCL describing two main subtypes with specific molecular characteristics and clinical features, classical and indolent leukaemic nonnodal MCL. Recent research results suggested an improving outcome of this neoplasm. The addition of rituximab to conventional chemotherapy has increased overall response rates, but it did not improve overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone. The use of intensive frontline therapies including rituximab and consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation ameliorated response rate and prolonged progression-free survival in young fit patients, but any impact on survival remains to be proven. Furthermore, the optimal timing, cytoreductive regimen and conditioning regimen, and the clinical implications of achieving a disease remission even at molecular level remain to be elucidated. The development of targeted therapies as the consequence of better understanding of pathogenetic pathways in MCL might improve the outcome of conventional chemotherapy and spare the toxicity of intense therapy in most patients. Cases not eligible for intensive regimens, may be considered for less demanding therapies, such as the combination of rituximab either with CHOP or with purine analogues, or bendamustine. Allogeneic SCT can be an effective option for relapsed disease in patients who are fit enough and have a compatible donor. Maintenance rituximab may be considered after response to immunochemotherapy as the first-line strategy in a wide range of patients. Finally, since the optimal approach to the management of MCL is still evolving, it is critical that these patients are enrolled in clinical trials to identify the better treatment options.

Systematic literature review of the global burden of illness of mantle cell lymphoma

Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), a rare and aggressive disease, accounts for approximately 5% of all B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Evidence on the burden of this disease, for patients and healthcare providers, is scarce.Methods: Four systematic literature reviews were developed to identify epidemiological, real-world clinical, economic and humanistic burden data on patients with MCL. Electronic databases searched included MEDLINE and Embase, NHS EED and Econlit.Results: Eight epidemiological studies, 19 clinical burden, 2 economic impact and 0 quality of life studies were identified. The range of standardized MCL incidence rates was 0.1-1.27/100,000. Overall survival rates of patients at 3 years differed by age at diagnosis (≤65 years: 76-81%, >65 years: 46-64%) and disease stage (stage I: 73-80%, stage IV: 48-53%). Outcomes were poorer in previously treated patients, and those with later stage or blastoid disease, and improved with more recent diagnosis/treatment. Hospitalization is a major contributor to healthcare cost and differs by therapy toxicity.Conclusions: We identified significant data gaps for many G20 countries for epidemiology, real-world clinical, economic and humanistic burden. These literature reviews demonstrate the ongoing unmet need for MCL patients globally. Future research to further understand the real-world impact of MCL is needed along with new therapeutic options to improve patient outcomes.

Clinical features and treatment outcomes of limited-stage mantle cell lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma report

Limited-stage (Ann Arbor stage I or II) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an extremely rare disease. Thus, there is little data on the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with early-stage MCL. We examined consecutive stage I or II MCL 41 cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 in 16 institutions of the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma group. All cases were pathologically confirmed and systemic evaluation was performed for staging. The clinical features were reviewed, and the treatment outcomes were analyzed. The median age of patients was 66 years (range 19-85 years); there were more men (n = 31, 75.6%) than women. Most patients (n = 28, 68.3%) had stage 2 disease, and 29 (70.7%) were symptomatic. The elevation of lactate dehydrogenase (n = 2, 4.9%) was not common; thus, 39 patients (95.1%) had a low-risk score (0 or 1) for the International Prognostic Index, and 28 (68.3%) had a low-risk score (1-3) for the MCL International Prognostic Index. Most patients (n = 37, 90.1%) received chemotherapy as the first therapeutic strategy, while some received radiotherapy (n = 2), surgical resection (n = 1), or no treatment (n = 1). Of the patients who received chemotherapy, 23 (56.9%) received a rituximab-containing regimen, and R-CHOP (n = 17) and R-bendamustine (n = 5) were commonly used. The best response was noted in 97.4% (n = 38) of patients, including 32 who showed a complete response (78%). With a median follow-up duration of 40.6 months, the 42 months relapse-free survival was 59.1%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 80.4%. Limited-state MCL showed indolent clinical and low-risk prognostic features. Chemotherapy could be effective for controlling localized MCL lesions, with high complete response rates.

Colorectal Lymphoma: A Review

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that primarily involves the colon is rare and should be distinguished from the more common systemic nodal lymphoma. It has unique clinical expectations and management consideration. Different histologic subtypes of NHL involve the colon, which varies in the clinical behavior and likelihood of obtaining durable remissions with treatment. This article will review the current understanding of the different histologic subtypes of primary colorectal lymphoma and propose management algorithms.

[Radiotherapy in localized stages of follicular and diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphomas]

Treatment with monoclonal antibodies, especially rituximab, is more and more frequent and questions the interest of radiotherapy in limited stages of diffuse B-cell large cell and follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. From a review of literature, it appears that radiotherapy is of interest in bulky disease, patients with incomplete metabolic response, elderly patients receiving short chemotherapy and those with recurrence after exclusive chemotherapy. Finally, this article gives recommendations on available techniques of radiotherapy and doses to be delivered.