Postoperative Chemoradiation Therapy in High-Risk Cervical Cancer: Re-evaluating the Findings of Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 109 in a Large, Population-Based Cohort

Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of PIK3CA Mutation and CNV Status and Phosphorylated AKT Expression in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Primary Surgery

Currently, there are limited and conflicting reports on the prognostic utility of PIK3CA and associated pathway markers for cervical cancers treated with primary surgical management. Moreover, current studies are lacking complete characterization of adjuvant treatment with RT and/or chemotherapy. We aimed to document the prevalence, clinicopathologic, adjuvant treatment details, and prognostic value of PI3K/AKT pathway mutations and copy number variation and phosphorylated AKT status in patients with cervical cancers treated with primary surgery. A clinicopathologic review was performed on a retrospective cohort of 185 patients with cervical cancer, treated with primary surgery at a single tertiary institution. Next-generation sequencing and digital PCR was used to determine PI3K/AKT pathway mutational status and PIK3CA copy number variation, respectively, and fluorescent immunohistochemistry measured phosphorylated AKT expression. In all, 179 of 185 (96.8%) of tumors were successfully sequenced; 48 (26.8%) were positive for PI3K/AKT pathway mutations-the majority (n=37, 77.1%) PIK3CA mutations. PIK3CA mutation was associated with pathologically positive lymph nodes [12 (32%) vs. 22 (16%); P =0.022] and indication for postoperative chemoradiotherapy [17 (45.9%) vs. 32 (22.5%); P =0.004]. On multivariable analysis, PIK3CA status was not associated with overall survival ( P =0.103) or progression-free survival ( P =0.240) at 5 yrs, nor was PIK3CA copy number variation status. phosphorylated AKT ≤ median significantly predicted for progression-free survival [multivariable hazard ratio 0.39 (0.17-0.89; P =0.025)] but not overall survival ( P =0.087). The correlation of PIK3CA with pathologic positive lymph node status yet lack of association with survival outcomes may be due to the use of adjuvant postoperative therapy. PIK3CA assessment before radical hysterectomy may help identify patients with a higher risk of node-positive disease.

Impact of different post-operative treatment modalities on long-term outcomes in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer

Objective

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer patients receiving different adjuvant treatment modalities after radical hysterectomy.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2012, patients diagnosed with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy plus retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy with pathologically confirmed positive lymph nodes, and received either radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiation, or sequential chemoradiation, were included in this study. Survival analysis was performed according to different adjuvant treatment modalities and after adjustment using propensity score matching.

Results

A total of 192 stage IIICp cervical cancer patients were eligible. In multivariate analysis, only sequential chemoradiation versus radiotherapy was associated with both overall survival (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.94, p=0.035) and disease-free survival (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57, p<0.001). The 5-year overall survival for radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiation, and sequential chemoradiation was 71.6%, 81.7%, and 81.5%, respectively. No significant difference in overall survival was noted between the three groups (radiotherapy vs concurrent chemoradiation, p=0.15; radiotherapy vs sequential chemoradiation, p=0.09; concurrent chemoradiation vs sequential chemoradiation, p=0.95). However, sequential chemoradiation significantly increased disease-free survival compared with radiotherapy alone (79.2% vs 63.1%, p=0.028). After propensity score matching in the baseline characteristics, both overall survival (88.0% vs 71.6%, p=0.028) and disease-free survival (88.0% vs 63.1%, p=0.021) were improved in the sequential chemoradiation group compared with radiotherapy alone; no significant differences were noted between sequential chemoradiation and concurrent chemoradiation (overall survival 88.0% vs 83.8%, p=0.50; disease-free survival 88.0% vs 75.8%, p=0.28).

Conclusion

In this cohort of FIGO 2018 IIICp cervical cancer patients, post-operative sequential chemoradiation was associated with higher survival compared with radiotherapy alone after propensity matching. Future prospective studies are required to further elucidate the optimal modality in node-positive cervical cancer.

The effectiveness of consolidation chemotherapy in high-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients following concurrent chemoradiation after radical surgery

OBJECTIVE

Studies determining which early-stage cervical cancer patients with high-risk factors benefit from consolidation chemotherapy after postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) are limited and inconsistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of consolidation chemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2019, a retrospective review was conducted among high-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients who were treated with postoperative CCRT or consolidation chemotherapy after postoperative CCRT. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 293 patients with early-stage cervical cancer were included in this study. A total of 188 patients were in the consolidation chemotherapy group, and 105 patients were in the postoperative CCRT alone group. The median follow-up was 48.3 months (range: 3-123 months). In the survival analyses, no significant differences in DFS (P = 0.21) or OS (P = 0.15) were observed between the groups. The grade 3-4 leukopenia and neutropenia rates in the consolidation group were higher than those in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone group (54.8% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.02; 49.4% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.001, respectively). For patients with ≥2 positive lymph nodes or ≥2 high-risk factors, consolidation chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (P = 0.013 and P = 0.002) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) compared with CCRT alone.

CONCLUSION

For early-stage cervical cancer, consolidation chemotherapy after postoperative CCRT improved survival outcomes in patients with ≥2 positive lymph nodes or ≥2 high-risk factors.

Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2021

In the 2021 series, we not only summarized the major clinical research advances in gynecologic oncology but also added discussions to every part, based on communications at the conference. A review of cervical cancer included adjuvant treatments such as radiation and chemoradiation (concurrent or sequential) after radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced, recurrent, and metastatic disease. Ovarian cancer research included studies of secondary cytoreductive surgery in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, and various trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and conventional chemotherapy. The rechallenge of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer were also addressed. For uterine corpus cancer, dostarlimab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody) alone, or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in combination with pembrolizumab for advanced, metastatic, or recurrent endometrial cancer were reviewed. The survival differences between the intensive and minimalist follow-up protocols were also described. In this review, we compared salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in terms of quality of life in BRCA 1 and 2 pathogenic variant carriers.

Age-Dependent Hematologic Toxicity Profiles and Prognostic Serologic Markers in Postoperative Radiochemotherapy Treatment for Uterine Cervical Cancer

Introduction: In the adjuvant setting for cervical cancer, classical risk factors for postoperative radiochemotherapy have been established. However, data on laboratory changes during therapy and the prognostic value of serological markers are limited and further knowledge is needed to optimize the toxic trimodal regimen. Methods: We retrospectively identified 69 women who underwent weekly postoperative radiochemotherapy with 40 mg/m² of cisplatin for cervical cancer between 2010 and 2021 at a single center. Laboratory parameters were recorded before, at each cycle and after radiochemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used to calculate and compare survival, groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U, χ², and variance tests. Results: With a median follow-up of 17.7 months, the 1- and 5-year local control rates were 94.0% and 73.7%, respectively, with significantly better rates for more chemotherapy cycles and negative resection margins. Only 68.1% of patients completed all cycles. The most common reasons for early discontinuation were persistent asymptomatic leukopenia in women aged ≤ 50 years, and limiting infections in women aged > 50 years. Leukopenia was more likely to occur after the third cycle. Significantly worse survival was observed for post-radiochemotherapy elevated C-reactive-protein and lactate dehydrogenase levels, low pre-radiochemotherapy nutritional index, and raised C-reactive-protein-levels; the latter were also predictable for local control. The Glasgow prognostic score did not reliably predict survival. Conclusion: Incomplete application of simultaneous chemotherapy leads to inferior local control, and age-dependent limiting factors should be identified at an early stage. In addition to classical risk factors, serological markers (C-reactive-protein, lactate dehydrogenase, nutritional index) show prognostic significance.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of cervical cancer with different histological types: A population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The prognostic impact and treatment responses among cervical cancer patients with different histological types remains inconclusive. To determine the prognostic effects of different histologic types, we identified 39,088 patients with a diagnosis of cervical cancer between 2004 and 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program.

METHODS

Variables related to the prognosis of cervical cancer were evaluated using log-rank method and univariate/multivariate Cox models before and after propensity score matching.

RESULT

Of the 36,310 patients, Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most common histological type (n = 27,043, 74.5%), followed by adenocarcinoma (AC, n = 7755, 21.4%) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC, n = 1512, 4.1%). Compared to SCC patients, patients with AC (HR = 1.14, 95%CI = 1.09-1.20, P < 0.01) and ASC (HR = 1.28, 95%CI = 1.18-1.40, P < 0.01) showed significantly poorer prognosis. Subgroup analyses indicated that the differences in prognosis between AC and SCC were only observed in stage II and III patients (P < 0.01). In patients with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, survival rates of patients with AC were significantly worse compared with similar patients with SCC (HR = 1.14, 95%CI = 1.03-1.27; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The prognostic impact of histologic types among patients with cervical cancer depends on tumor stages and therapeutic approaches. Tailored treatment and follow-up planning need to be developed across patients with different histological types and stages.

The Combination of T Stage and the Number of Pathologic Lymph Nodes Provides Better Prognostic Discrimination in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer With Lymph Node Involvement

OBJECTIVE

Stage I and II cervical cancer with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node (LN) metastases are upstaged to stage IIIC under the new FIGO 2018 staging system, and radical chemoradiotherapy was recommended. But heterogeneity in outcome existed in this group of patients. We conducted this retrospective analysis to evaluate the heterogeneity of these patients and tried to provide a more detailed classification to reflect the prognosis and guide the treatment. We also evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of surgery followed by sequential chemoradiotherapy in this cohort.

METHODS

Early-stage cervical cancer with LN involvement that had radical hysterectomy followed by sequential chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Survival analyses were conducted to identify the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 242 patients were included in the study; 64 (26.4%) patients had treatment failure, and 51 (21.1%) died. Pathology, T stage, the number of pathologic LN (pLN), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy or not were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival and overall survival (OS). Patients with T1N < 3 pLN had significantly better survival than T2N < 3 pLN/T1-2 N≥ 3 pLN, with failure rates of 11.6% and 35.8% in each group; and 5 year OS was 92% and 62%, respectively (P = 0.000). About 1.5% of the patients discontinued radiotherapy, and 14.1% had G3-4 hematological toxic effects during radiotherapy; 1.7% developed G2-3 lower limb edema, and 2.9% developed severe urinary toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Nodal involvement alone is inadequate as the sole pathologic factor to predict survival in early-stage cervical cancer. The combination of tumor and node subcategory provides better prognostic discrimination.

The prognosis of "sandwich" mode of postoperative chemotherapy and radiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the survival outcome between different postoperative radiation and chemotherapy modes in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort study. A total of 150 patients with LACC underwent radical hysterectomy combined with postoperative radiation and /or chemotherapy from October 2009 to October 2019. Of those, 101 patients who received "sandwich" adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation (SCR) were enrolled into group A and 49 patients who received simple radiation were enrolled into group B. The primary outcome was the rates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 150 patients, 95.3% (143/150) patients complete the study. The rates of deep myometrial invasion (92% and 72.9%, p = 0.007), lymph vascular invasion positive (74.3% and 26.5%, p = 2.59 × 10^-8 ), positive surgical margin (11.9% and 0%, p = 0.012), and lymph-node involvement (40.6% vs. 4.1%, p = 4.0 × 10^-6 ) at baseline were higher in the group A than group B. There was no difference between the follow-up time of group A and group B (45.81 ± 16.83 vs. 45.81 ± 16.84 months, p = 0.665). After the postoperative adjuvant, group A achieved the comparable PFS to group B [p = 0.40; hazard ratio (HR), 1.45; 95% CI, 0.62-3.38]. The cumulative rate of OS in group A was comparable in group B (p = 0.31; HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.68-3.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative 'sandwich' chemotherapy and radiation could yield a similar survival rate to radiation alone in LACC women with high-risk factors such as deep interstitial infiltration, lymphatic vascular space infiltration, positive resection margin, and lymph-node metastasis.

Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with Intermediate-Risk Factors: Model Development and Validation Based on Machine Learning Algorithm

Background

Adjuvant therapy for patients with cervical cancer (CC) with intermediate‐risk factors remains controversial. The objectives of the present study are to assess the prognoses of patients with early‐stage CC with pathological intermediate‐risk factors and to provide a reference for adjuvant therapy choice.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 481 patients with stage IB–IIA CC. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, machine learning (ML) algorithms, Kaplan‐Meier analysis, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to develop and validate prediction models for disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 35 (7.3%) patients experienced recurrence, and 20 (4.2%) patients died. Two prediction models were built for DFS and OS using clinical information, including age, lymphovascular space invasion, stromal invasion, tumor size, and adjuvant treatment. Patients were divided into high‐risk or low‐risk groups according to the risk score cutoff value. The Kaplan‐Meier analysis showed significant differences in DFS (p = .001) and OS (p = .011) between the two risk groups. In the traditional Sedlis criteria groups, there were no significant differences in DFS or OS (p > .05). In the ML‐based validation, the best AUCs of DFS at 2 and 5 years were 0.69/0.69, and the best AUCs of OS at 2 and 5 years were 0.88/0.63.

Conclusion

Two prognostic assessment models were successfully established, and risk grouping stratified the prognostic risk of patients with CC with pathological intermediate‐risk factors. Evaluation of long‐term survival will be needed to corroborate these findings.

Implications for Practice

The Sedlis criteria are intermediate‐risk factors used to guide postoperative adjuvant treatment in patients with cervical cancer. However, for patients meeting the Sedlis criteria, the choice of adjuvant therapy remains controversial. This study developed two prognostic models based on pathological intermediate‐risk factors. According to the risk score obtained by the prediction model, patients can be further divided into groups with high or low risk of recurrence and death. The prognostic models developed in this study can be used in clinical practice to stratify prognostic risk and provide more individualized adjuvant therapy choices to patients with early‐stage cervical cancer.

Adjuvant treatment for patients with cervical cancer remains controversial. This article assesses the prognosis of early‐stage cervical cancer with pathological intermediate‐risk factors and provides a reference for choice of adjuvant therapy.

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Radical Hysterectomy Followed by Tailored Adjuvant Therapy in Women with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Presenting with Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis on Pretreatment Evaluation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Simple Summary

Pelvic nodal involvement is frequently present in early-stage cervical cancer patients on pretreatment imaging studies. However, it is unclear whether radical chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or radical hysterectomy RH followed by tailored adjuvant radiotherapy is more appropriate in these patients. We compared oncological outcomes of up-front surgery followed by tailored adjuvant radiotherapy and definitive CRT in these patients. We found no differences in outcomes existed between definitive CRT and hysterectomy with tailored adjuvant radiotherapy. However, after surgery, 88.7% of patients required adjuvant radiotherapy. These findings suggest that definitive CRT can avoid unplanned tri-modality therapy without compromising oncologic outcomes.

Abstract

To compare the oncologic outcomes between chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and radical hysterectomy followed by tailored adjuvant therapy in patients with early cervical cancer presenting with pelvic lymph node metastasis. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of women with early cervical cancer presenting with positive pelvic nodes identified on pretreatment imaging assessment. Propensity score matching was employed to control for the heterogeneity between two groups according to confounding factors. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and pattern of failure were compared between the two groups. A total of 262 patients were identified; among them, 67 received definitive CRT (group A), and 195 received hysterectomy (group B). Adjuvant therapy was administered to 88.7% of group B. There were no significant differences between group A and group B regarding the 5-year overall survival rates (89.2% vs. 89.0%) as well as disease-free survival rates (80.6% vs. 82.7%), and patterns of failure. Distant metastasis was the major failure pattern identified in both groups. In multivariate analysis, non-squamous histology was significantly associated with poorer overall survival. As there are no significant differences in 5-year OS, DFS, and patterns of failure, definitive CRT could avoid the combined modality therapy without compromising oncologic outcomes.

Analysis of the prognostic factors determining the oncological outcomes in patients with high-risk early-stage cervical cancer

We aimed to evaluate clinicopathological data in high-risk early-stage cervical cancer and to define the prognostic factors determining the oncological outcomes. This retrospective study included 158 patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy plus lymph node dissection. Each patient had at least one high-risk factor. The median tumour diameter of the study group was 30 mm (range, 6-80). Seventy-five (47.5%) patients had parametrial invasion, 32 (20.3%) had positive surgical margins, and 108 (68.4%) had lymph node metastasis. The median duration of follow-up was 42 months (range, 1-228). During this period, 28 patients developed recurrence, and the recurrent disease occurred in a distant area in 18 patients. Five-year disease-free survival was 77.5%, and five-year disease-specific survival was 85%. In multivariate analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy was identified as an independent prognostic factor for recurrence and death. The recurrence (Odds ratio: 10.139, 95% CI: 1.477-69.590, p = .018) and mortality rates (Odds ratio: 16.485, 95% CI: 2.484-109.408, p =.004) were higher in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? The decision to proceed with adjuvant therapy in the patients with early-stage disease treated with surgery depends on the presence of risk factors in pathological examination. Various prognostic factors have been identified in cervical cancer (CC). However, there is a limited number of studies describing the prognostic factors in early-stage CC with high-risk factors.What do the results of this study add? In current study, the recurrence and mortality rates were higher in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy. No relationship was found between the survival outcomes and the number of high-risk factors. Most of the patients who developed recurrence had the recurrence in the distant localisation. This result questioned the adequacy of adjuvant therapy.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? There is still a debate over the prognostic factors and the adjuvant treatment options in the patients with early-stage cervical cancer who possess high-risk factors. Adjuvant RT or adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy must definitely be used in this patients. However, adjuvant therapy fails approximately 14-32%, thus multimodal treatment modalities must be developed to improve the recurrence rates and the survival.

Effectiveness of Sequential Chemoradiation vs Concurrent Chemoradiation or Radiation Alone in Adjuvant Treatment After Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: The STARS Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

There is no current consensus on the role of chemotherapy in addition to radiation for postoperative adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer with adverse pathological factors.

Objective

To evaluate the clinical benefits of sequential chemoradiation (SCRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) compared with radiation alone (RT) as a postoperative adjuvant treatment in early-stage cervical cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

After radical hysterectomy at 1 of 8 participating hospitals in China, patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IB to IIA cervical cancer with adverse pathological factors were randomized 1:1:1 to receive adjuvant RT, CCRT, or SCRT. Data were collected from February 2008 to December 2018.

Interventions

Patients received adjuvant RT (total dose, 45-50 Gy), CCRT (weekly cisplatin, 30-40 mg/m2), or SCRT (cisplatin, 60-75 mg/m2, plus paclitaxel, 135-175 mg/m2) in a 21-day cycle, given 2 cycles before and 2 cycles after radiotherapy, respectively.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the rate of disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years.

Results

A total of 1048 women (median [range] age, 48 [23-65] years) were included in the analysis (350 in the RT group, 345 in the CCRT group, and 353 in the SCRT group). Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were balanced among the treatment groups except that the rate of lymph node involvement was lowest in the RT group (18.3%). In the intention-to-treat population, SCRT was associated with a higher rate of DFS than RT (3-year rate, 90.0% vs 82.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35-0.76) and CCRT (90.0% vs 85.0%; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.96). Treatment with SCRT also decreased cancer death risk compared with RT (5-year rate, 92.0% vs 88.0%; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.95) after adjustment for lymph node involvement. However, neither DFS nor cancer death risk was different among patients treated with CCRT or RT.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, conducted in a postoperative adjuvant treatment setting, SCRT, rather than CCRT, resulted in a higher DFS and lower risk of cancer death than RT among women with early-stage cervical cancer.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00806117.

Is there a benefit for adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in early cervical cancer? Results from a population-based study

PURPOSE

Due to insufficient and conflicting prospective evidence, the recommendations on when to apply adjuvant radiochemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer vary between international guidelines. In this population-based study, we evaluated the outcome of patients with early-stage cervical cancer based on risk factors and the adjuvant therapy they received.

METHODS

The effect of primary therapy (surgery and radiochemotherapy RCT, surgery and radiotherapy RT, and surgery alone) on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated in the complete cohort of 442 patients and in subgroups according to risk profile and nodal status.

RESULTS

In low-risk patients, there was no difference in OS (p = 0.276) depending on whether patients received adjuvant therapy or not. Concerning RFS, patients with RT (including one patient with RCT) exhibited a significantly worse outcome compared to the group with surgery alone (p = 0.015). In intermediate-risk patients, the administration of adjuvant RT significantly benefited RFS when compared to surgery only in multivariate analysis (p = 0.031). Concerning OS, no significant influence for adjuvant treatment could be seen (p = 0.354). Though trends towards better OS and RFS could be observed in patients of the high-risk group-both in RCT and RT groups compared to surgery alone-the effects did not prove to be significant.

CONCLUSION

Our study reaffirms the evidence against the use of adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. In intermediate-, and less pronounced in high-risk patients, however, it seems to be beneficial. The role of adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in early cervical cancer should be further investigated in prospective randomized trials.

Radiation Records in the National Cancer Database: Variations in Coding and/or Practice Can Significantly Alter Survival Results

PURPOSE

The aim of the current work was to quantify internally inconsistent and anomalous radiation therapy (RT) data in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and determine their association with overall survival (OS) using node-positive uterine cancer as a test clinical scenario.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all NCDB participants with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC1 to IIIC2 uterine cancer treated with hysterectomy and adjuvant RT between 1998 and 2012. Variables that were reviewed to identify anomalous data included RT site, modality, dose, fractions, timing, duration, and stage. We used χ² testing to associate anomalous data with reporting facility and demographic variables. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparison between cohorts was performed using the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 14,298 analyzed participants, 2,288 (16.0%) had one or more anomalous data entry, 538 (3.8%) likely because of an incomplete RT course. χ² testing suggested differences in anomalous data prevalence by reporting facility type (P = .0007), geographic region (P < .001), distance from participants' homes (P < .001), diagnosis year (P < .001), and location of RT relative to reporting facility (P = .0038). Five-year OS in those with one or more anomalous data entry was 51.3% versus 58.0% for those without anomalous data (P < .001), and anomalous data remained significantly associated with OS on multivariable analysis. After excluding insufficient, excessive, or unknown total RT dose, anomalous data were no longer significant on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

The overwhelming majority of RT data within the NCDB seem to be appropriate for the clinical scenario. Nevertheless, approximately one eighth of participants in this test clinical scenario had adjuvant RT data that were internally inconsistent or outside generously defined norms. The presence of anomalous RT data was significantly associated with compromised OS, an effect not observed after correcting for total RT dose.

The Selection of Time Interval Between Surgery and Adjuvant Therapy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The optimal interval between surgery and adjuvant treatment has not yet been found in cervical cancer. And whether patients with different FIGO stage should choose different interval is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether interval has a different effect on oncologic outcome for patients with different tumor stages.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 226 cervical cancer patients who were treated by surgery and adjuvant therapy from May 2005 to August 2015. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the interval of 5 weeks. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients with interval shorter and longer than 5 weeks in the whole group and subgroups. Recurrence patterns were also analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed to explore clinical factors significantly associated with DFS, local recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival for patients with stage IB2-IIA.

RESULTS

For patients with stage IA2-IB1, the 5-year OS and DFS were similar between groups of short and long interval with also the comparable results of local and distant failure. For patients with IB2-IIA, both the OS and DFS in the short-interval group were higher than that in the long-interval group. Besides, the rates of local recurrence were found higher in the group of long interval compared with short interval. Multivariable analysis indicated that time interval was an independent predictor of DFS and local recurrence-free survival for patients with stage IB2-IIA.

CONCLUSIONS

In cervical cancer patients, time interval between surgery and adjuvant therapy may have different effects on the prognosis in different FIGO stages.

Current Quality of Gynecologic Cancer Care in North America

Evaluating the quality of care received by gynecologic cancer patients in the real world is essential for excellent outcomes. The recent population-based literature looking at quality of care was reviewed for all gynecologic malignancies. Outcomes are generally highest when care is provided by high-volume providers in high-volume cancer centers. Provision of care according to clinical practice guidelines has also been demonstrated to improve outcomes in many situations. Disparities exist for marginalized groups in terms of the care they receive and subsequent outcomes. Health systems need to improve care for these populations.

Long-term results of early adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for high-risk, early stage uterine cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy

Background

The aim of the present study was to investigate the long-term survival outcomes and toxicities associated with our experienced early administration of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

Methods

Ninety-eight patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis, positive resection margin, and/or parametrial invasion who received adjuvant CCRT between 1995 and 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. The first cycle of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated within 2–3 weeks after surgery (median, 12 days) and continued every 4 weeks for a total of 4 cycles. Adjuvant radiotherapy was performed during the second and third cycles of chemotherapy.

Results

After a median follow-up period of 119 months for survivors, 13 patients (13.3%) experienced recurrence and 11 patients died of cancer during the follow-up period. The 5-year recurrence-free survival and cancer specific survival rates were 87.6% and 90.6%, respectively. Ninety-four patients (95.9%) received ≥3 cycles of chemotherapy. Total radiation dose of ≥45 Gy was delivered in 91 patients (92.9%). Grade 3–4 hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities developed in 37 (37.8%) and 14 (14.3%) patients during CCRT, respectively.

Conclusion

The present study confirmed the long-term safety and encouraging survival outcomes of early administration of adjuvant CCRT, suggesting the benefits of early time to initiation of adjuvant treatments.

Utilization of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy Among Women in the United States With High-risk Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Prospective randomized data demonstrates that chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves overall survival in women with high-risk pathologic features following radical hysterectomy. Despite this, not all high-risk patients receive adjuvant CRT and the patterns of care in this patient population are unknown. We sought to investigate the rates of adjuvant therapy utilization through analysis of the National Cancer Database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for women with cervical cancer treated initially with hysterectomy from 2002 to 2012. Patients without high-risk pathologic features were excluded: pN, positive surgical margins, and parametrial invasion (Peters' criteria). Among the 5947 evaluable patients, univariable analysis and multivariable analysis were performed to investigate potential factors associated with CRT utilization and overall survival following diagnosis.

RESULTS

Adjuvant CRT was performed in 41.8% of women and adjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and no adjuvant therapy was utilized in 9.8%, 23.6%, and 24.8% of women, respectively. On multivariable analysis, CRT utilization was associated with younger age, race, lower facility volume, pN, parametrial invasion, and a negative surgical margin. Residence distance to treating facility, year of diagnosis, household income, insurance status, and facility type did not predict for CRT utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite level I evidence supporting its use, less than half of women in this large US cohort with high-risk cervical cancer received adjuvant CRT. Use of adjuvant CRT for women did not significantly increase between 2002 and 2012. Patient age, race, and pathologic risk factors were associated with use of adjuvant CRT.