Dosimetric Factors and Toxicity in Highly Conformal Thoracic Reirradiation

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Tolerances for the Inferior Aspect of the Brachial Plexus: A Systematic Review

We sought to systematically review and summarize dosimetric factors associated with radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or hypofractionated image guided radiation therapy (HIGRT). From published studies identified from searches of PubMed and Embase databases, data quantifying risks of RIBP after 1- to 10-fraction SBRT/HIGRT were extracted and summarized. Published studies have reported <10% risks of RIBP with maximum doses (Dmax) to the inferior aspect of the brachial plexus of 32 Gy in 5 fractions and 25 Gy in 3 fractions. For 10-fraction HIGRT, risks of RIBP appear to be low with Dmax < 40 to 50 Gy. For a given dose value, greater risks are anticipated with point volume-based metrics (ie, D0.03-0.035cc: minimum dose to hottest 0.03-0.035 cc) versus Dmax. With SBRT/HIGRT, there were insufficient published data to predict risks of RIBP relative to brachial plexus dose-volume exposure. Minimizing maximum doses and possibly volume exposure of the brachial plexus can reduce risks of RIBP after SBRT/HIGRT. Further study is needed to better understand the effect of volume exposure on the brachial plexus and whether there are location-specific susceptibilities along or within the brachial plexus structure.

Definitive intensity modulated proton re-irradiation for lung cancer in the immunotherapy era

Introduction

As immunotherapy has improved distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), isolated locoregional recurrences have increased. However, management of locoregional recurrences can be challenging. We report our institutional experience with definitive intent re-irradiation using Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT).

Method

Retrospective cohort study of recurrent or second primary NSCLC or LS-SCLC treated with IMPT. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for time-to-event analyses.

Results

22 patients were treated from 2019 to 2021. After first course of radiation (median 60 Gy, range 45-70 Gy), 45% received adjuvant immunotherapy. IMPT re-irradiation began a median of 28.2 months (8.8-172.9 months) after initial radiotherapy. The median IMPT dose was 60 GyE (44-60 GyE). 36% received concurrent chemotherapy with IMPT and 18% received immunotherapy after IMPT. The median patient's IMPT lung mean dose was 5.3 GyE (0.9-13.9 GyE) and 5 patients had cumulative esophagus max dose >100 GyE with 1-year overall survival (OS) 68%, 1-year local control 80%, 1-year progression free survival 45%, and 1-year DMFS 60%. Higher IMPT (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.7, p=0.01) and initial radiotherapy mean lung doses (HR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.6, p=0.04) were associated with worse OS. Two patients developed Grade 3 pneumonitis or dermatitis, one patient developed Grade 2 pneumonitis, and seven patients developed Grade 1 toxicity. There were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities.

Discussion

Definitive IMPT re-irradiation for lung cancer can prolong disease control with limited toxicity, particularly in the immunotherapy era.

Re-irradiation for intra-thoracic tumours and extra-thoracic breast cancer: dose accumulation, evaluation of efficacy and toxicity based on a literature review

The improvement seen in the diagnostic procedures and treatment of thoracic tumours means that patients have an increased chance of longer overall survival. Nevertheless, we can still find those who have had a recurrence or developed a secondary cancer in the previously treated area. These patients require retreatment including re-irradiation. We have reviewed the published data on thoracic re-irradiation, which shows that some specific healthy tissues can tolerate a significant dose of irradiation and these patients benefit from aggressive treatment; however, there is a risk of damage to normal tissue under these circumstances. We analysed the literature data on re-irradiation in the areas of vertebral bodies, spinal cord, breast, lung and oesophagus. We evaluated the doses of primary and secondary radiotherapy, the treatment techniques, as well as the local control and median or overall survival in patients treated with re-radiation. The longest OS is reported in the case of re-irradiation after second breast-conserving therapy where the 5-year OS range is 81 to 100% and is shorter in patients with loco-reginal re-irradiation where the 5-y OS range is 18 to 60%. 2-year OS in patients re-irradiated for lung cancer and oesophagus cancer range from 13 to 74% and 18 to 42%, respectively. Majority grade ≥3 toxicity after second breast-conserving therapy was fibrosis up to 35%. For loco-regional breast cancer recurrences, early toxicity occurred in up to 33% of patients resulting in mostly desquamation, while late toxicity was recorded in up to 23% of patients and were mostly ulcerations. Early grade ≥3 lung toxicity developed in up to 39% of patients and up to 20% of Grade 5 hemoptysis. The most frequently observed early toxicity grade ≥3 in oesophageal cancer was oesophagitis recorded in up to 57% of patients, followed by hematological complications which was recorded in up to 50% of patients. The most common late complications included dysphagia, recorded in up to 16.7% of patients. We have shown that thoracic re-irradiation is feasible and effective in achieving local control in some patients. Re-irradiation should be performed with maximum accuracy and care using the best available treatment methods with a highly conformal, image-guided approach. Due to tremendous technological progress in the field of radiotherapy, we can deliver radiation precisely, shorten the overall treatment time and potentially reduce treatment-related toxicities.

An algorithm for thoracic re-irradiation using biologically effective dose: a common language on how to treat in a "no-treat zone"

Background

Re-irradiation (re-RT) is a technically challenging task for which few standardized approaches exist. This is in part due to the lack of a common platform to assess dose tolerance in relation to toxicity in the re-RT setting. To better address this knowledge gap and provide new tools for studying and developing thresholds for re-RT, we developed a novel algorithm that allows for anatomically accurate three-dimensional mapping of composite biological effective dose (BED) distributions from nominal doses (Gy).

Methods

The algorithm was designed to automatically convert nominal dose from prior treatment plans to corresponding BED value maps (voxel size 2.5 mm³ and α/β of 3 for normal tissue, BED₃). Following the conversion of each plan to a BED₃ dose distribution, deformable registration was used to create a summed composite re-irradiation BED₃ plan for each patient who received two treatments. A proof-of-principle analysis was performed on 38 re-irradiation cases of initial stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) followed by either re-SABR or chemoradiation for isolated locoregional recurrence of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Results

Evaluation of the algorithm-generated maps revealed appropriate conversion of physical dose to BED at each voxel. Of 14 patients receiving repeat SABR, there was one case each of grade 3 chest wall pain (7%), pneumonitis (7%), and dyspnea (7%). Of 24 patients undergoing repeat fractionated radiotherapy, grade 3 events were limited to two cases each of pneumonitis and dyspnea (8%). Composite BED₃ dosimetry for each patient who experienced grade 2–3 events is provided and may help guide development of precise cumulative dose thresholds for organs at risk in the re-RT setting.

Conclusions

This novel algorithm successfully created a voxel-by-voxel composite treatment plan using BED values. This approach may be used to more precisely examine dosimetric predictors of toxicities and to establish more accurate normal tissue constraints for re-irradiation.

Thoracic re-irradiation with 3D-conformal or more advanced techniques: A systematic review of treatment safety by the Re-irradiation Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation and Oncology AIRO

Re-irradiation (re-RT) is a treatment modality that has been actively investigated in recurrent lung cancer or in lung metastases appeared in previously irradiated areas. A literature search, according PRISMA recommendations and a meta-analysis technique were performed with the aims to identify possible factors related to the toxicity incidence and severity of ≥ G3 acute toxicity. 1243 patients and 36 studies, met inclusion criteria. Our results, showed that there was no difference in ≥ G3 acute (10,5%) toxicity rate with respect to different radiation techniques, cumulative dose and re-irradiation total dose and fractionation. Factors eventually related to severe toxicity were described. The frequent lack of a sufficient description of the treatment's intent, the heterogeneity in technique and radiotherapy regimen, makes balancing risk and benefit of re-RT based on published data even more difficult.

Re-Irradiation for Locally Recurrent Lung Cancer: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis

The treatment of locally recurrent lung cancer is a major challenge for radiation-oncologists, especially with data on high-dose reirradiation being limited to small retrospective studies. The aim of the present study is to assess overall survival (OS) for patients with locally recurrent lung cancer after high-dose thoracic reirradiation. Thirty-nine patients who were re-irradiated for lung cancer relapse between October 2013 and February 2019 were eligible for the current retrospective analysis. All patients were re-irradiated with curative intent for in-field tumor recurrence. The diagnostic work-up included a mandatory ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT scan and—if possible—histological verification. The ECOG was ≤2, and the interval between initial and second radiation was at least nine months. Thirty patients (77%) had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), eight (20%) had small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and in one patient (3%) histological confirmation could not be obtained. More than half of the patients (20/39, 51%) received re-treatment with dose differentiated accelerated re-irradiation (DART) at a median interval of 20.5 months (range: 6–145.3 months) after the initial radiation course. A cumulative EQD₂ of 131 Gy (range: 77–211 Gy) in a median PTV of 46 mL (range: 4–541 mL) was delivered. Patients with SCLC had a 3 mL larger median re-irradiation volume (48 mL, range: 9–541) compared to NSCLC patients (45 mL, range: 4–239). The median cumulative EQD2 delivered in SCLC patients was 84 Gy (range: 77–193 Gy), while NSCLC patients received a median cumulative EQD2 of 135 Gy (range: 98–211 Gy). The median OS was 18.4 months (range: 0.6–64 months), with tumor volume being the only predictor (p < 0.000; HR 1.007; 95%-CI: 1.003–1.012). In terms of toxicity, 17.9% acute and 2.6% late side effects were observed, with a toxicity grade >3 occurring in only one patient. Thoracic high dose reirradiation plays a significant role in prolonging survival, especially in patients with small tumor volume at recurrence.

Re-Irradiation of Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Locoregional recurrence occurs in 10%-30% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after treatment with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy. Re-irradiation is the main curative-intent treatment option for these patients; however, it represents a therapeutic challenge for thoracic radiation oncologists. Re-irradiation practices are variable worldwide with lack of agreement on the optimal dose or the cumulative maximum dose acceptable for critical organs. The role of re-irradiation in NSCLC is also not clearly defined in the era of immunotherapy. In this review, we will present published and on-going re-irradiation studies for recurrent NSCLC. We will appraise available evidence for critical organ dose constraints and provide a framework for future therapeutic approaches and trials.

An International Expert Survey on the Indications and Practice of Radical Thoracic Reirradiation for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

Thoracic reirradiation for non-small cell lung cancer with curative intent is potentially associated with severe toxicity. There are limited prospective data on the best method to deliver this treatment. We sought to develop expert consensus guidance on the safe practice of treating non-small cell lung cancer with radiation therapy in the setting of prior thoracic irradiation.

Methods and Materials

Twenty-one thoracic radiation oncologists were invited to participate in an international Delphi consensus process. Guideline statements were developed and refined during 4 rounds on the definition of reirradiation, selection of appropriate patients, pretreatment assessments, planning of radiation therapy, and cumulative dose constraints. Consensus was achieved once ≥75% of respondents agreed with a statement. Statements that did not reach consensus in the initial survey rounds were revised based on respondents’ comments and re-presented in subsequent rounds.

Results

Fifteen radiation oncologists participated in the 4 surveys between September 2019 and March 2020. The first 3 rounds had a 100% response rate, and the final round was completed by 93% of participants. Thirty-three out of 77 statements across all rounds achieved consensus. Key recommendations are as follows: (1) appropriate patients should have a good performance status and can have locally relapsed disease or second primary cancers, and there are no absolute lung function values that preclude reirradiation; (2) a full diagnostic workup should be performed in patients with suspected local recurrence and; (3) any reirradiation should be delivered using optimal image guidance and highly conformal techniques. In addition, consensus cumulative dose for the organs at risk in the thorax are described.

Conclusions

These consensus statements provide practical guidance on appropriate patient selection for reirradiation, appropriate radiation therapy techniques, and cumulative dose constraints.

Re-irradiation in the thorax - An analysis of efficacy and safety based on accumulated EQD2 doses

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic re-irradiation remains a challenge regarding the balance of local efficacy and acceptable toxicities. In this retrospective analysis we analyzed dosimetrical and clinical data of patients treated with thoracic re-irradiation based on accumulated EQD2Gy doses.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 42 consecutive single-institutional patients treated with repeated courses of thoracic radiotherapy from 12/2011 to 01/2017. Accumulated EQD2 dose distributions were calculated and dose parameters for organs at risk and target volumes were analysed.

RESULTS

The median prescription dose was 42.2 Gy (10-70.6 Gy) for all RT courses. The median Dmean of both lungs was 10.1 Gy₃ (range: 1.9 Gy₃-17.9 Gy₃) with a maximum D0.1 cc of 253.86 Gy₃. The median D0.1 cc of the esophagus was 62.2 Gy₃ with a maximum of 103.78 Gy₃. The maximum D0.1 cc for the bronchial tree was 187.33 Gy₃ (median 74.35 Gy₃) and for the Aorta 216.1 Gy₃ (median 70.9 Gy₃). Median OS after first re-irradiation was 19 months (range 1-45 months). 12-month local control after a course of re-irradiation was 52.6%. 80% of patients suffered from a G1-G2 toxicity, most frequently coughing. One patient suffered from a G5 complication probably unrelated to re-irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Even though several organs at risk received maximum accumulated doses of >100 Gy₃, thoracic reirradiation resulted in an acceptable toxicity profile. Local tumor control and overall survival remained encouraging even after multiple courses of thoracic radiotherapy.

Long-term toxicity and survival outcomes after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for patients with centrally located thoracic tumors

Background

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is effective for thoracic cancer and metastases; however, adverse effects are greater for central tumors. We evaluated factors affecting outcomes and toxicities after SABR for patients with primary lung and oligometastatic tumors.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively identified consecutive patients with centrally located lung tumors that were treated at our hospital from 2009-2016. The effects of patient, disease, and treatment-related parameters on local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity-free survival (TFS) were evaluated with multivariate analyses.

Results

Among 65 consecutive patients identified with 70 centrally located tumors, 20 tumors (28%) were reirradiated. Median (range) total dose for all tumors was 55 (30–60) Gy in 5 (3–10) fractions. Radiographic complete response was obtained in 43 lesions (61%). None of the analyzed factors were correlated with complete response. After a median follow-up of 57 (95% CI, 48–65) months, 10 tumors (14%) relapsed and 37 patients (57%) died; the actuarial 2- and 5-year OS rates were 52% and 28%, respectively. Median OS was significantly lower in patients with grade 3 or higher toxicity vs. lower toxicity (5 vs. 39 months; P < 0.001). Among 17 severe toxicities, 5 were grade 5, and 3 of them were reirradiated to the same field. Grade 3 to 5 TFS was lower with vs. without reirradiation (2-year TFS, 63% vs. 96%; P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Our study showed that modern SABR is effective for central lung tumors, and toxicities are acceptable. SABR for reirradiated central lung lesions and possibly for lesions abutting the tracheobronchial tree may result in higher risk of serious toxicities.

Effectiveness and Safety of Reirradiation With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer After a First Course of Thoracic Radiation: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness and safety of reirradiation with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (re-SABR) in patients with recurrence after a previous course of radiation are limited to small series. We carried out a meta-analysis to summarize existing data and identify trends in overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and toxicity after re-SABR in patients with recurrence of lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible studies were identified on Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the proceedings of annual meetings through June 2019. We followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A meta-regression analysis was carried out to assess whether there is a relationship between moderator variables and outcomes. A P-value<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Twenty observational studies with a total of 595 patients treated were included. The 2-year OS and LC were 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.61) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.66-0.80), respectively. The rate of any toxicity grade ≥3 was 0.098 (95% CI: 0.06-13.6), with 9 grade 5 toxicity (1.5%). In the meta-regression, the re-SABR dose (P=0.028), tumor size (P=0.031), and time to recurrence (P=0.018) showed an association with survival. For LC, the re-SABR dose (P=0.034) and tumor size (P=0.040) were statistically significant. Any toxicity grade ≥3 showed a relationship with the cumulative dose (P=0.024). Cumulative dose ≤145 versus >145 Gy2 had 3% versus 15% (P=0.013) of any grade ≥3 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-SABR produces satisfactory LC and OS rates with an acceptable rate of toxicity. The balancing between the re-SABR dose and the tumor location has the potential to reduce severe and fatal toxicity.

Challenges in Re-Irradiation in the Thorax: Managing Patients with Locally Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Treatment of locally recurrent non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) after definitive chemoradiation therapy is challenging as patients are often inoperable and systemic therapy alone frequently results in suboptimal outcomes. Re-irradiation of NSCLC may be the best strategy for treating locoregional failures with the goal of durable long-term control and potentially cure. Repeat irradiation is technically challenging for fear of life-threatening toxicities to previously irradiated organs at risk while also delivering definitive doses of radiation to recurrent disease. No standard guidelines exist with regards to re-irradiation technique and re-treatment dose constraints to organs at risks. We herein describe a case of locoregional recurrence after definitive chemoradiation therapy for NSCLC with expert opinions for subsequent management. As described and guided by our experts, we review the various techniques for repeat radiation therapy, treatment planning goals, and reported toxicities and outcomes in the re-irradiation setting.

Clinical outcomes and toxicity predictors of thoracic re-irradiation for locoregionally recurrent lung cancer

Background and purpose

Thoracic re-irradiation may be an alternative treatment for lung cancer patients who develop intrathoracic locoregional recurrence without systemic progression. This study aimed to retrospectively assess locoregional control, clinical outcomes, and toxicities in lung cancer patients who received thoracic re-irradiation.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 50 lung cancer patients who received thoracic re-irradiation using conventional photon radiotherapy (RT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) between 2009 and 2017. The correlations of clinicopathologic factors, treatment factors, and dosimetric factors of RT with time to local progression (TTLP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after starting thoracic re-irradiation were calculated using log-rank tests and Cox regression models.

Results

The median re-irradiation dose in equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions was 51.1 Gy, and the mean re-irradiation planning target volume was 201.58 ml. The median mean lung dose (MLD) was 4.18 Gy, and the total lung volumes receiving a dose of 5 Gy (lung V5) and of 20 Gy (V20) were 19.8% and 5.85%, respectively. The TTLP, PFS, and OS were 18.0, 5.9, and 25.1 months, respectively. Lung V5 (p < 0.001), V20 (p = 0.011), and MLD (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with grade ≥2 lung toxicity. Seven (14%) patients developed lethal lung events. Subsequent chemotherapy following thoracic re-irradiation was significantly correlated with lethal lung events (p = 0.009).

Conclusion

Promising local control can be achieved with thoracic re-irradiation in lung cancer patients with locoregional recurrence. However, unexpected lethal lung events may occur, especially in patients receiving systemic therapy following thoracic re-irradiation.

End-of-Range Radiobiological Effect on Rib Fractures in Patients Receiving Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

A prospective trial of proton therapy for breast cancer revealed an increased rib fracture rate of 7%, which is higher than the expected rate based on the literature on photon therapies. We aim to evaluate the hypothesis that the increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE) at the distal edge of proton beams is the cause.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We combined the cohort from the prospective clinical trial and a retrospective cohort from a database. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to recalculate the physical dose and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd). The first 10 ribs and fracture areas in patients with fractures were contoured and deformably registered. The LETd-weighted dose was used as a surrogate for biological effectiveness and compared with the conventional fixed RBE of 1.1. Dose to 0.5 cm³ of the ribs (D0.5) was selected to analyze the dose-response relationship using logistic regression. We chose an alpha/beta ratio of 3 to calculate the biological effective dose in Gy₃(RBE).

RESULTS

Thirteen of 203 patients in the cohorts exhibited a total of 25 fractures. The LETd in fractured areas is increased (6.1 ± 2.0 keV/μm, mean ± standard deviation), suggesting possible end-of-range radiobiological effects with increased RBE. The D0.5 of the fractured ribs is 80.3 ± 9.4 Gy₃(RBE) with a generic factor of 1.1 and is relatively low compared with historical photon results. On the other hand, the D0.5 of the fractured ribs is 100.0 ± 12.5 Gy₃(RBE) using the LETd-based model with a dose-response curve that is more consistent with historical photon data.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased rib fracture rate seen in our trial is probably associated with the increased LETd and RBE at the distal edge of proton beams. This phenomenon warrants further investigation and possible integration of LETd into treatment planning and optimization in proton therapy.

Long term efficacy and toxicity after stereotactic ablative reirradiation in locally relapsed stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy, there is a high rate of relapse. Some of these relapses are only local and can be treated by stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). Previous studies reporting outcome after SABR reirradiation of the thorax consisted of a heterogeneous population of various lung cancer stages or even different types of cancer. The purpose of study is to evaluate toxicity and outcome of this strategy in locally relapsed stage III NSCLC only.

METHODS

From February 2007 to November 2015, 46 Stage III NSCLC patients treated with SABR, for lung recurrence following conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT), were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 47.3 months (1-76.9). The 2 and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were of 25.5%/8.6 and 48.9%/30.8%, respectively. Highest presenting toxicity in patients (grade 1 through 5) was: 13 (28.3%), 7 (15.2%), 1 (2.2%), 0 and 2 (4.4%), with deaths due to hemoptysis (n = 1) and alveolitis (n = 1). Although the Biological Effective Dose (at Planning Tumor Volume isocenter) was lower for central tumors treated for an in-field relapse (n = 21, 116 Gy versus 168 Gy, p = 0.005), they had no significant difference in OS than the remaining cohort, but with a higher rate of grade 2-5 toxicities (OR = 0.22, [0.06-0.8], p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Reirradiation with SABR for local relapse in patients previously treated for stage III NSCLC, is feasible and associated with good outcome. This is also true for central tumors treated for an in-field relapse, but should be radiated with caution to mitigate toxicity.

Line-Enhanced Deformable Registration of Pulmonary Computed Tomography Images Before and After Radiation Therapy With Radiation-Induced Fibrosis

Purpose:

The deformable registration of pulmonary computed tomography images before and after radiation therapy is challenging due to anatomic changes from radiation fibrosis. We hypothesize that a line-enhanced registration algorithm can reduce landmark error over the entire lung, including the irradiated regions, when compared to an intensity-based deformable registration algorithm.

Materials:

Two intensity-based B-spline deformable registration algorithms of pre-radiation therapy and post-radiation therapy images were compared. The first was a control intensity–based algorithm that utilized computed tomography images without modification. The second was a line enhancement algorithm that incorporated a Hessian-based line enhancement filter prior to deformable image registration. Registrations were evaluated based on the landmark error between user-identified landmark pairs and the overlap ratio.

Results:

Twenty-one patients with pre-radiation therapy and post-radiation therapy scans were included. The median time interval between scans was 1.2 years (range: 0.3-3.3 years). Median landmark errors for the line enhancement algorithm were significantly lower than those for the control algorithm over the entire lung (1.67 vs 1.83 mm; P < .01), as well as within the 0 to 5 Gy (1.40 vs 1.57; P < .01) and >5 Gy (2.25 vs 3.31; P < .01) dose intervals. The median lung mask overlap ratio for the line enhancement algorithm (96.2%) was greater than that for the control algorithm (95.8%; P < .01). Landmark error within the >5 Gy dose interval demonstrated a significant inverse relationship with post-radiation therapy fibrosis enhancement after line enhancement filtration (Pearson correlation coefficient = −0.48; P = .03).

Conclusion:

The line enhancement registration algorithm is a promising method for registering images before and after radiation therapy.

A Systematic Literature Review on Salvage Radiotherapy for Local or Regional Recurrence After Previous Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

Purpose:

The purpose of this review article was to summarize available data on the efficacy and safety of salvage radiotherapy for isolated local or regional recurrence after prior stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Methods:

Studies were systematically searched on PubMed, following which suitable papers were selected. Reported outcomes and toxicities were qualitatively reviewed.

Results:

Nineteen papers, which were retrospective studies based on single institution experiences, were selected. Sixteen papers were on salvage radiotherapy for local tumor recurrence, and the remaining 3 papers evaluated radiotherapy for regional failures after stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer. Patient cohorts in the selected papers seemed very frail with 2-year survival of 30% to 40% after the salvage. Local control was reported to be approximately 60% to 70%, which is worse than that after primary stereotactic body radiotherapy. Reported rates of toxicity grade 3 or worse were considered acceptable. Larger target volume and central tumor localization were suggested as risk factors for severe toxicities. Dosimetric data on patients having toxicities were found to help with considering dose constraints for organs at risk.

Conclusion:

Based on data from a limited number of articles, salvage radiotherapy is a reasonable treatment option for select patients with local or regional tumor recurrence after prior stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer. Optimal patient selection and dose prescription can be clarified with a larger study that include more data on experiences with salvage radiotherapy.

Re-irradiation volumetric modulated arc therapy optimization based on cumulative biologically effective dose objectives

The objective of this note is to introduce a clinical tool that generates ideal base plan dose distributions to enable re‐irradiation volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) optimization based on cumulative biological effective dose objectives for specific organs at risk (OARs). The tool is demonstrated with a lung cancer case that required re‐irradiation at our clinic. First, previous treatment dose is deformed onto the retreatment computed tomography (CT) using commercial software. Then, the in‐house Matlab tool alters the deformed previous dose using radiobiological concepts on a voxel‐by‐voxel manner to generate an ideal base plan dose distribution. Ideal base plans that were generated using the in‐house Matlab tool were compatible with the Varian Eclipse™ treatment planning system. The tool enabled optimization of VMAT re‐irradiation plans using cumulative dose limits for OARs and all OAR cumulative dose objectives were met on the first optimization for the recurrent lung cancer case tested.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy as salvage treatment for recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer after prior surgery or radiotherapy

Treatment options for thoracic recurrences of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging, potentially effective technology to manage recurrent NSCLC, although with limited prospective studies. This work reviews the outcomes of patients undergoing salvage SBRT for pulmonary recurrences after prior resection or prior radiotherapy for NSCLC. Following salvage SBRT, after prior external beam radiation (SBRT or conventionally fractionated), the 2-year overall survival (OS) ranged from 37% to 79% in 11 of the studies (397 patients) reviewed here, while the 2-year local control (LC) ranged from 37% to 90% in 6 studies that reported that outcome. Toxicity risks are acceptable albeit with appreciable risks of severe to potentially fatal toxicity, necessitating the need to weigh risks vs. benefits in the re-irradiation setting. There were fewer studies on the use of SBRT after prior resection. Following salvage SBRT, after prior resection, the 2-year OS ranged from 56% to 68% in 4 studies (131 patients) reviewed here, while the 2-year LC ranged from 83% to 100% in 3 of these studies. SBRT in the salvage setting after prior resection appeared to be well-tolerated, with toxicity risks comparable to historical patients treated with SBRT alone (i.e., SBRT without prior resection, which is not reviewed here). The data are limited due to the retrospective nature of published studies (all but 4 with <40 patients), with various clinical scenarios (i.e., original NSCLC stage, prior treatment, location of target amenable to salvage SBRT) and a range of SBRT dosing and techniques. More studies are needed to better understand the tumor control, survival and toxicity of SBRT for salvage therapy of NSCLC patients, as well as the potentially prognostic factors that could affect these outcomes.

Re-irradiation and Hyperthermia in Breast Cancer

Half of locoregional recurrences after breast cancer treatment are isolated events. Restaging should be carried out to select patients for curative salvage treatment. The approach depends on the characteristics of the primary and recurrent cancer, previous locoregional and systemic treatments, site of recurrence, comorbidities and the patient's wishes. A multidisciplinary discussion should be associated with the shared decision-making process. In view of the potential long-term disease-free survival, meticulous target volume delineation and selection of the most appropriate techniques should be used to decrease the risk of toxicity. This overview aims to provide clinicians with tools to manage the different scenarios of breast cancer patients with locoregional recurrences in the context of re-irradiation.

Re-irradiation for Locally Recurrent Lung Cancer: Evidence, Risks and Benefits

In spite of recent improvements in both the technical delivery of radiotherapy and systemic therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, local recurrence rates after radiotherapy remain a significant challenge. In the setting of local relapse after radiotherapy, treatments such as surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation are often not appropriate owing to disease and patient factors. Re-irradiation may be a potential treatment option. This overview considers the published evidence and potential treatment strategies.