1
|
Chen Q, Rong Y, Burmeister JW, Chao EH, Corradini NA, Followill DS, Li XA, Liu A, Qi XS, Shi H, Smilowitz JB. AAPM Task Group Report 306: Quality control and assurance for tomotherapy: An update to Task Group Report 148. Med Phys 2023; 50:e25-e52. [PMID: 36512742 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the publication of AAPM Task Group (TG) 148 on quality assurance (QA) for helical tomotherapy, there have been many new developments on the tomotherapy platform involving treatment delivery, on-board imaging options, motion management, and treatment planning systems (TPSs). In response to a need for guidance on quality control (QC) and QA for these technologies, the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee commissioned TG 306 to review these changes and make recommendations related to these technology updates. The specific objectives of this TG were (1) to update, as needed, recommendations on tolerance limits, frequencies and QC/QA testing methodology in TG 148, (2) address the commissioning and necessary QA checks, as a supplement to Medical Physics Practice Guidelines (MPPG) with respect to tomotherapy TPS and (3) to provide risk-based recommendations on the new technology implemented clinically and treatment delivery workflow. Detailed recommendations on QA tests and their tolerance levels are provided for dynamic jaws, binary multileaf collimators, and Synchrony motion management. A subset of TPS commissioning and QA checks in MPPG 5.a. applicable to tomotherapy are recommended. In addition, failure mode and effects analysis has been conducted among TG members to obtain multi-institutional analysis on tomotherapy-related failure modes and their effect ranking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quan Chen
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospitals, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jay W Burmeister
- Karmanos Cancer Center, Gershenson R.O.C., Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | - David S Followill
- Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - X Allen Li
- Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - An Liu
- Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - X Sharon Qi
- Radiation Oncology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Hairong Shi
- Radiation Oncology, Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Jennifer B Smilowitz
- Human Oncology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qi XS, Chu FI, Zhang Z, Chin RK, Raldow A, Kishan AU, Lee P, Chang A, Kalbasi A, Kamrava M, Steinberg ML, Low DA. Clinical Development and Evaluation of Megavoltage Topogram for Fast Patient Alignment on Helical Tomotherapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1334-1341. [PMID: 33305096 PMCID: PMC7718556 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To develop and evaluate a fast patient localization tool using megavoltage (MV)-topogram on helical tomotherapy. Methods and Materials Eighty-one MV-topogram pairs for 18 pelvis patients undergoing radiation were acquired weekly under an institutional review board–approved clinical trial. The MV-topogram imaging protocol requires 2 orthogonal acquisitions at static gantry angles of 0 degrees and 90 degrees for a programed scan length. A MATLAB based in-house software was developed to reconstruct the MV-topograms offline. Reference images (digitally reconstructed topograms, digitally reconstructed topograms) were generated using the planning computed tomography and tomotherapy geometry. The MV-topogram based alignment was determined by registering the MV-topograms to the digitally reconstructed topogram using bony landmark on commercial MIM software. The daily shifts in 3 translational directions determined from MV-topograms were compared with the megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) based patient shifts. Linear-regression and two one-sided tests equivalence tests were performed to investigate the relation and equivalence between the 2 techniques. Seventy-eight MV-topogram pairs for 19 head and neck patients were included to validate the finding. Results The magnitudes of alignment differences of (MVCT − MV-topogram) (and standard deviations) were −0.3 ± 2.1, −0.8 ± 2.4, and 1.6 ± 1.7 mm for pelvis and 0.6 ± 1.2, 0.8 ± 4.2, 1.6 ± 2.6 mm for head and neck; the linear-regression coefficients between 2 imaging techniques were 1.18, 1.10, 0.94, and 0.86, 0.63, 0.38 in the lateral, longitudinal, vertical directions for pelvis and head and neck, respectively. The acquisition time for a pair of MV-topograms was up to 12.7 times less than MVCT scans (coarse scan mode) while covering longer longitudinal length. Conclusions MV-topograms showed equivalent clinical performance to the standard MVCT with significantly less acquisition time for pelvis and H&N patients. The MV-topogram can be used as an alternative or complimentary tool for bony landmark-based patient alignment on tomotherapy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang H, Liu J, Pi Y, Liu Q, Mi Y, Yang X, Guo Y, Fan R. Technical note: factors affecting dose distribution in the overlap region of two-segment total body irradiation by helical tomotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:257. [PMID: 33160374 PMCID: PMC7648982 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01698-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effects of various treatment planning parameters to identify the optimal gap distance for precise two-segment total body irradiation (TBI) using helical tomotherapy (HT) with fixed jaw mode. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data of a treatment plan for 8 acute leukemia patients (height range: 109-130 cm) were analyzed. All patients underwent total-body computed tomography (CT) with 5-mm slice thickness. A lead wire, placed at 10 cm above the patella, was used to mark the boundary between the two segments. Target volumes and organs at risk were delineated using a Varian Eclipse 10.0 physician's workstation. Different distances between the lead wire and the boundary of the two targets were used. CT images were transferred to the HT workstation to design the treatment plans, by adjusting parameters, including the field width (FW; 2.5 cm, and 5 cm), pitch (0.287 and 0.430), modulation factor (1.8). The plans were superimposed to analyze the dose distributions in the overlap region when varying target gap distances, FWs, pitches to determine the optimal combinations. RESULTS The pitch did not affect the dose distribution in the overlap region. The dose distribution in the overlap region was mostly homogeneous when the target gap distance was equal to the FW. Increased FW diminished the effect of the target gap distance on the heterogeneous index of the overlap region. CONCLUSIONS In two-segment TBI treatments by HT with Helix mode, a gap distance equal to the FW may achieve optimal dose distribution in the overlap region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HaiYang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China
| | - JunQi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China
| | - YiFei Pi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yang Mi
- Department of Marshall Medical Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China
| | - XiangXiang Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China
| | - YueXin Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China.
| | - RuiTai Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shen J, Wang X, Deng D, Gong J, Tan K, Zhao H, Bao Z, Xiao J, Liu A, Zhou Y, Liu H, Xie C. Evaluation and improvement the safety of total marrow irradiation with helical tomotherapy using repeat failure mode and effects analysis. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:238. [PMID: 31882010 PMCID: PMC6935229 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1433-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & PURPOSE Helical tomotherapy has been applied to total marrow irradiation (HT-TMI). Our objective was to apply failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) two times separated by 1 year to evaluate and improve the safety of HT-TMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary team was created. FMEA consists of 4 main steps: (1) Creation of a process map; (2) Identification of all potential failure mode (FM) in the process; (3) Evaluation of the occurrence (O), detectability (D) and severity of impact (S) of each FM according to a scoring criteria (1-10), with the subsequent calculation of the risk priority number (RPN=O*D*S) and (4) Identification of the feasible and effective quality control (QC) methods for the highest risks. A second FMEA was performed for the high-risk FMs based on the same risk analysis team in 1 year later. RESULTS A total of 39 subprocesses and 122 FMs were derived. First time RPN ranged from 3 to 264.3. Twenty-five FMs were defined as being high-risk, with the top 5 FMs (first RPN/ second RPN): (1) treatment couch movement failure (264.3/102.8); (2) section plan dose junction error in delivery (236.7/110.4); (3) setup check by megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) failure (216.8/94.6); (4) patient immobilization error (212.5/90.2) and (5) treatment interruption (204.8/134.2). A total of 20 staff members participated in the study. The second RPN value of the top 5 high-risk FMs were all decreased. CONCLUSION QC interventions were implemented based on the FMEA results. HT-TMI specific treatment couch tests; the arms immobilization methods and strategy of section plan dose junction in delivery were proved to be effective in the improvement of the safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiuling Shen
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaoyong Wang
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Di Deng
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jian Gong
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Kang Tan
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hongli Zhao
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Zhirong Bao
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jinping Xiao
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - An Liu
- Divisions of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yunfeng Zhou
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China. .,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| | - Conghua Xie
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People's Republic of China. .,Hubei Radiotherapy Quality Control Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zuro D, Vagge S, Broggi S, Agostinelli S, Takahashi Y, Brooks J, Leszcynska P, Liu A, Zucchetti C, Saldi S, Han C, Cattaneo M, Giebel S, Mahe MA, Sanchez JF, Alaei P, Anna C, Dusenbery K, Pierini A, Storme G, Aristei C, Wong JYC, Hui S. Multi-institutional evaluation of MVCT guided patient registration and dosimetric precision in total marrow irradiation: A global health initiative by the international consortium of total marrow irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:275-282. [PMID: 31421913 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 06/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Total marrow irradiation (TMI) is a highly conformal treatment of the human skeleton structure requiring a high degree of precision and accuracy for treatment delivery. Although many centers worldwide initiated clinical studies using TMI, currently there is no standard for pretreatment patient setup. To this end, the accuracy of different patient setups was measured using pretreatment imaging. Their impact on dose delivery was assessed for multiple institutions. METHODS AND MATERIALS Whole body imaging (WBI) or partial body imaging (PBI) was performed using pretreatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) in a helical Tomotherapy machine. Rigid registration of MVCT and planning kilovoltage computed tomography images were performed to measure setup error and its effect on dose distribution. The entire skeleton was considered the planning target volume (PTV) with five sub regions: head/neck (HN), spine, shoulder and clavicle (SC), and one avoidance structure, the lungs. Sixty-eight total patients (>300 images) across six institutions were analyzed. RESULTS Patient setup techniques differed between centers, creating variations in dose delivery. Registration accuracy varied by anatomical region and by imaging technique, with the lowest to the highest degree of pretreatment rigid shifts in the following order: spine, pelvis, HN, SC, and lungs. Mean fractional dose was affected in regions of high registration mismatch, in particular the lungs. CONCLUSIONS MVCT imaging and whole body patient immobilization was essential for assessing treatment setup, allowing for the complete analysis of 3D dose distribution in the PTV and lungs (or avoidance structures).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Zuro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Stefano Vagge
- Deparment of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Sara Broggi
- Department of Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Agostinelli
- Deparment of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Yutaka Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Jamison Brooks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, USA
| | - Paulina Leszcynska
- Department of Radiotherapy Planning, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland
| | - An Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, USA
| | | | - Simonetta Saldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nantes, France
| | - Chunhui Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, USA
| | - Mauro Cattaneo
- Department of Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sebastian Giebel
- Department of Radiotherapy Planning, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland
| | - Marc Andre Mahe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nantes, France
| | - James F Sanchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, USA
| | - Parham Alaei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Chiara Anna
- Department of Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Kathryn Dusenbery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Antonio Pierini
- Division of Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Guy Storme
- Department of Radiotherapy UZ Brussel, Belgium
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nantes, France
| | - Jeffrey Y C Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, USA
| | - Susanta Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hui S, Brunstein C, Takahashi Y, DeFor T, Holtan SG, Bachanova V, Wilke C, Zuro D, Ustun C, Weisdorf D, Dusenbery K, Verneris MR. Dose Escalation of Total Marrow Irradiation in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017; 23:1110-1116. [PMID: 28396164 PMCID: PMC5531195 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Patients with refractory leukemia or minimal residual disease (MRD) at transplantation are at increased risk of relapse. Augmentation of irradiation, especially to sites of disease (ie, bone marrow) is one potential strategy for overcoming this risk. We studied the feasibility of radiation dose escalation in high-risk patients using total marrow irradiation (TMI) in a phase I dose-escalation trial. Four pediatric and 8 adult patients received conditioning with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine in conjunction with image-guided radiation to the bone marrow at 15 Gy and 18 Gy (in 3-Gy fractions), while maintaining the total body irradiation (TBI) dose to the vital organs (lungs, hearts, eyes, liver, and kidneys) at <13.2 Gy. The biologically effective dose of TMI delivered to the bone marrow was increased by 62% at 15 Gy and by 96% at 18 Gy compared with standard TBI. Although excessive dose-limiting toxicity, defined by graft failure or excessive specific organ toxicity, was not encountered, 3 of 6 patients experienced treatment-related mortality at 18 Gy. Thus, we halted enrollment at this dose level and treated an additional 4 patients at 15 Gy. The 1- year overall survival was 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-67%) and disease-free survival was 22% (95% CI, 4%-49%). The rate of relapse was 36% (95% CI, 10%-62%), and nonrelapse mortality was 42% (95% CI, 14%-70%). This study shows that TMI dose escalation to 15 Gy is feasible with acceptable toxicity in pediatric and adult patients with high-risk leukemia undergoing umbilical cord blood and sibling donor transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanta Hui
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Claudio Brunstein
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Yutaka Takahashi
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Todd DeFor
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Shernan G Holtan
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Veronika Bachanova
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Christopher Wilke
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Darren Zuro
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Celalettin Ustun
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Daniel Weisdorf
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Kathryn Dusenbery
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Michael R Verneris
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|