Thermal Skin Damage During Reirradiation and Hyperthermia Is Time-Temperature Dependent

Theoretical evaluation of the impact of diverse treatment conditions by calculation of the tumor control probability (TCP) of simulated cervical cancer Hyperthermia-Radiotherapy (HT-RT) treatments in-silico

INTRODUCTION

Hyperthermia (HT) induces various cellular biological processes, such as repair impairment and direct HT cell killing. In this context, in-silico biophysical models that translate deviations in the treatment conditions into clinical outcome variations may be used to study the extent of such processes and their influence on combined hyperthermia plus radiotherapy (HT + RT) treatments under varying conditions.

METHODS

An extended linear-quadratic model calibrated for SiHa and HeLa cell lines (cervical cancer) was used to theoretically study the impact of varying HT treatment conditions on radiosensitization and direct HT cell killing effect. Simulated patients were generated to compute the Tumor Control Probability (TCP) under different HT conditions (number of HT sessions, temperature and time interval), which were randomly selected within margins based on reported patient data.

RESULTS

Under the studied conditions, model-based simulations suggested a treatment improvement with a total CEM43 thermal dose of approximately 10 min. Additionally, for a given thermal dose, TCP increased with the number of HT sessions. Furthermore, in the simulations, we showed that the TCP dependence on the temperature/time interval is more correlated with the mean value than with the minimum/maximum value and that comparing the treatment outcome with the mean temperature can be an excellent strategy for studying the time interval effect.

CONCLUSION

The use of thermoradiobiological models allows us to theoretically study the impact of varying thermal conditions on HT + RT treatment outcomes. This approach can be used to optimize HT treatments, design clinical trials, and interpret patient data.

Nanomaterial-Enabled Photothermal Heating and Its Use for Cancer Therapy via Localized Hyperthermia

Photothermal therapy (PTT), which employs nanoscale transducers delivered into a tumor to locally generate heat upon irradiation with near-infrared light, shows great potential in killing cancer cells through hyperthermia. The efficacy of such a treatment is determined by a number of factors, including the amount, distribution, and dissipation of the generated heat, as well as the type of cancer cell involved. The amount of heat generated is largely controlled by the number of transducers accumulated inside the tumor, the absorption coefficient and photothermal conversion efficiency of the transducer, and the irradiance of the light. The efficacy of treatment depends on the distribution of the transducers in the tumor and the penetration depth of the light. The vascularity and tissue thermal conduction both affect the dissipation of heat and thereby the distribution of temperature. The successful implementation of PTT in the clinic setting critically depends on techniques for real-time monitoring and management of temperature.

Clinical wIRA-hyperthermia: heating properties and effectiveness in lower trunk regions and its accordance with ESHO quality criteria for superficial hyperthermia

PURPOSE

The heating characteristics of water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) radiation were investigated in vivo in two body regions of healthy humans according to the quality standards of the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology (ESHO) using an irradiance (infrared-A) of 146 W m-2 as recommended for clinical superficial hyperthermia (HT).

METHODS

wIRA was applied to the abdominal wall and lumbar region for 60 min. Skin surface temperature was limited to ≤43 °C. Tissue temperatures were measured invasively at 1-min intervals before, during and after wIRA exposure using five fiber-optical probes at depths of 1-20 mm.

RESULTS

Significant differences between body regions occurred during the heating-up phase at depths of 5-15 mm. Thermal steady states were reached at depths ≤5 mm after exposures of 5-6 min, and ≤20 mm after 20 min. On average, the minimum requirements of ESHO were exceeded in both regions by the following factors: ≈3 for the heating rate, ≈2 for the specific absorption rate and ≈1.4 for the temperature rise. Tissue depths with T90 ≥ 40 °C and T50 > 41 °C were ≤10 mm, and ≤20 mm for Tmax ≤ 43 °C. The temperature decay time after termination of irradiation was 1-5 min. Corresponding temperatures were ≤42.2 °C for CEM43 and ≤41.8 °C for CEM43T90, i.e., they are inadequate for direct thermal cell killing.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermography-controlled wIRA-HT complies with the ESHO criteria for superficial HT as a radiosensitizer and avoids the risk of thermal skin toxicity.

Systematic review about complementary medical hyperthermia in oncology

Hyperthermia is a generic term for different techniques using heat in cancer therapies. Temperatures of about 42° Celsius in combination with chemo- or radiotherapy may improve the effectiveness of those treatments. Clinical benefit is shown in “standard hyperthermia” with tumour temperatures assessed during treatment. This systematic review thoroughly assesses the state of evidence concerning the benefits and side effects of electro hyperthermia or whole-body hyperthermia (“alternative hyperthermia”) in oncology. From 26 April 2021 to 09 May 2021, a systematic search was conducted searching five electronic databases (Embase, Cochrane, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Medline) to find studies concerning the use, effectiveness and potential harm of alternative medical hyperthermia therapy on cancer patients. From all 47,388 search results, 53 publications concerning 53 studies with 2006 patients were included in this systematic review. The patients were diagnosed with different types of cancer. The hyperthermic methods included whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) with different methods and electro hyperthermia (EH). The majority of the included studies were single-arm studies, counting in total 32 studies. Six studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT). In addition, one systematic review (SR) was found. The most critical endpoints were tumour response, survival data, pain relief, myelosuppression and toxicities. Outcome was heterogeneous, and considering the methodological limitations, clinical evidence for the benefit of alternative hyperthermia in cancer patients is lacking. Neither for whole-body hyperthermia nor for electro hyperthermia there is any evidence with respect to improvement of survival or quality of life in cancer patients.

A randomized phase-II study of reirradiation and hyperthermia versus reirradiation and hyperthermia plus chemotherapy for locally recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area

BACKGROUND

In patients with inoperable local regional recurrences of breast cancer in previously irradiated areas, local control is difficult to maintain and treatment options are limited. The Dutch standard treatment for such recurrences is reirradiation combined with hyperthermia. Apart from enhancing the effect of reirradiation, hyperthermia is also known to improve local effects of chemotherapy like cisplatin. This randomized phase-II trial compares reirradiation and hyperthermia versus the same treatment combined with cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 2010 up to January 2019, 49 patients were randomized, 27 in the standard arm and 22 in the combined arm. A total of 32 Gy was given in eight fractions of 4 Gy in 4 weeks, at two fractions per week. After January 2015, the radiation schedule was changed to 46 Gy in 23 fractions of 2 Gy, at five fractions per week. Hyperthermia was added once a week after radiotherapy. The combined arm was treated with four cycles of weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m².

RESULTS

Complete response rate was 60.9% in the standard arm and 61.1% in the combined arm (p = 0.87). Partial response rate was 30.4% in the standard arm and 33.3% in the combined arm (p = 0.79). One-year overall survival was 63.4% in the standard arm and 57.4% in the combined arm. One-year local progression-free interval was 81.5% in the standard arm and 88.1% in the combined arm (p = 0.95). Twenty-five percentage of patients in the standard arm experienced grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity and 29% of patients in the combined arm (p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

No potential benefit could be detected of adding cisplatin to reirradiation and hyperthermia in patients with recurrent breast cancer in a previously irradiated area. With or without cisplatin, most patients had subsequent local control until last follow-up or death.

Post-operative re-irradiation with hyperthermia in locoregional breast cancer recurrence: Temperature matters

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of hyperthermia thermal dose (TD) on locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS) and toxicity in locoregional recurrent breast cancer patients treated with postoperative re-irradiation and hyperthermia.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 112 women with resected locoregional recurrent breast cancer treated in 2010-2017 with postoperative re-irradiation 8frx4Gy (n = 34) or 23frx2Gy (n = 78), combined with 4-5 weekly hyperthermia sessions guided by invasive thermometry, were subdivided into 'low' (n = 56) and 'high' TD (n = 56) groups by the best session with highest median cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (Best CEM43T50) < 7.2 min and ≥7.2 min, respectively. Actuarial LRC, OS and late toxicity incidence were analyzed. Backward multivariable Cox regression and inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis were performed.

RESULTS

TD subgroups showed no significant differences in patient/treatment characteristics. Median follow-up was 43 months (range 1-107 months). High vs. low TD was associated with LRC (p = 0.0013), but not with OS (p = 0.29) or late toxicity (p = 0.58). Three-year LRC was 74.0% vs. 92.3% in the low and high TD group, respectively (p = 0.008). After three years, 25.0% and 0.9% of the patients had late toxicity grade 3 and 4, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that distant metastasis (HR 17.6; 95%CI 5.2-60.2), lymph node involvement (HR 2.9; 95%CI 1.2-7.2), recurrence site (chest wall vs. breast; HR 4.6; 95%CI 1.8-11.6) and TD (low vs. high; HR 4.1; 95%CI 1.4-11.5) were associated with LRC. TD was associated with LRC in IPW analysis (p = 0.0018).

CONCLUSIONS

High thermal dose (best CEM43T50 ≥ 7.2 min) was associated with significantly higher LRC for patients with locoregional recurrent breast cancer treated with postoperative re-irradiation and hyperthermia, without augmenting toxicity.

Treatment planning facilitates clinical decision making for hyperthermia treatments

Background: Treatment quality is important in clinical hyperthermia. Guideline-based treatment protocols are used to determine system settings and treatment strategies to ensure effective tumor heating and prevent unwanted treatment-limiting normal tissue hot spots. Realizing both these goals can prove challenging using generic guideline-based and operator-dependent treatment strategies. Hyperthermia treatment planning (HTP) can be very useful to support treatment strategies. Although HTP is increasingly integrated into the standard clinical workflow, active clinical application is still limited to a small number of hyperthermia centers and should be further stimulated.Purpose: This paper aims to serve as a practical guide, demonstrating how HTP can be applied in clinical decision making for both superficial and locoregional hyperthermia treatments.HTP in clinical decision making: Seven problems that occur in daily clinical practice are described and we show how HTP can enhance insight to formulate an adequate treatment strategy. Examples use representative commercially available hyperthermia devices and cover all stages during the clinical workflow. Problems include selecting adequate phase settings, heating ability analysis, hot spot suppression, applicator selection, evaluation of target coverage and heating depth, and predicting possible thermal toxicity in case of an implant. Since we aim to promote a general use of HTP in daily practice, basic simulation strategies are used in these problems, avoiding a need for the application of dedicated advanced optimization routines that are not generally available.Conclusion: Even fairly basic HTP can facilitate clinical decision making, providing a meaningful and clinically relevant contribution to maintaining and improving treatment quality.

Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review

The therapeutic application of heat is very effective in cancer treatment. Both hyperthermia, i.e., heating to 39-45 °C to induce sensitization to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and thermal ablation, where temperatures beyond 50 °C destroy tumor cells directly are frequently applied in the clinic. Achievement of an effective treatment requires high quality heating equipment, precise thermal dosimetry, and adequate quality assurance. Several types of devices, antennas and heating or power delivery systems have been proposed and developed in recent decades. These vary considerably in technique, heating depth, ability to focus, and in the size of the heating focus. Clinically used heating techniques involve electromagnetic and ultrasonic heating, hyperthermic perfusion and conductive heating. Depending on clinical objectives and available technology, thermal therapies can be subdivided into three broad categories: local, locoregional, or whole body heating. Clinically used local heating techniques include interstitial hyperthermia and ablation, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), scanned focused ultrasound (SFUS), electroporation, nanoparticle heating, intraluminal heating and superficial heating. Locoregional heating techniques include phased array systems, capacitive systems and isolated perfusion. Whole body techniques focus on prevention of heat loss supplemented with energy deposition in the body, e.g., by infrared radiation. This review presents an overview of clinical hyperthermia and ablation devices used for local, locoregional, and whole body therapy. Proven and experimental clinical applications of thermal ablation and hyperthermia are listed. Methods for temperature measurement and the role of treatment planning to control treatments are discussed briefly, as well as future perspectives for heating technology for the treatment of tumors.

Effect of gastrointestinal gas on the temperature distribution in pancreatic cancer hyperthermia treatment planning

PURPOSE

In pancreatic cancer treatment, hyperthermia can be added to increase efficacy of chemo- and/or radiotherapy. Gas in stomach, intestines and colon is often in close proximity to the target volume. We investigated the impact of variations in gastrointestinal gas (GG) on temperature distributions during simulated hyperthermia treatment (HT).

METHODS

We used sets of one CT and eight cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans obtained prior to/during fractionated image-guided radiotherapy in four pancreatic cancer patients. In Plan2Heat, we simulated locoregional heating by an ALBA-4D phased array radiofrequency system and calculated temperature distributions for (i) the segmented CT (sCT), (ii) sCT with GG replaced by muscle (sCT₀), (iii) sCT₀ with eight different GG distributions as visible on CBCT inserted (sCT_CBCT). We calculated cumulative temperature-volume histograms for the clinical target volume (CTV) for all ten temperature distributions for each patient and investigated the relationship between GG volume and change in ΔT₅₀ (temperature increase at 50% of CTV volume). We determined location and volume of normal tissue receiving a high thermal dose.

RESULTS

GG volume on CBCT varied greatly (9-991 cm³). ΔT₅₀ increased for increasing GG volume; maximum ΔT₅₀ difference per patient was 0.4-0.6 °C. The risk for GG-associated treatment-limiting hot spots appeared low. Normal tissue high-temperature regions mostly occurred anteriorly; their volume and maximum temperature showed moderate positive correlations with GG volume, while fat-muscle interfaces were associated with higher risks for hot spots.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable changes in volume and position of gastrointestinal gas can occur and are associated with clinically relevant tumor temperature differences.

Clinical Feasibility of a High-Resolution Thermal Monitoring Sheet for Superficial Hyperthermia in Breast Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

Hyperthermia, i.e., heating tumors to 41–43 °C, combined with radiotherapy improves treatment response, for patients with recurrent breast cancer after previous irradiation. During hyperthermia of superficial tumors, the skin surface temperature must be monitored to ensure that therapeutic temperatures are reached without hotspots that can cause additional toxicity. A thin sheet with a dense grid of 56 temperature sensors was developed, this sheet is placed on the skin of the patient. The influence of the sheet on the hyperthermia applicator performance was investigated and found to be negligible. Next, the clinical feasibility was evaluated in 10 women with locoregional recurrent breast cancer, and resulted in precise monitoring of skin surface temperatures. In conclusion, this novel method can be implemented for thermal monitoring of the skin surface to ensure treatment quality during superficial hyperthermia treatment of patients with locoregional recurrent breast cancer.

Abstract

Background: Accurate monitoring of skin surface temperatures is necessary to ensure treatment quality during superficial hyperthermia. A high-resolution thermal monitoring sheet (TMS) was developed to monitor the skin surface temperature distribution. The influence of the TMS on applicator performance was investigated, feasibility and ability to reliably monitor the temperature distribution were evaluated in a clinical study. Methods: Phantom experiments were performed to determine the influence of the TMS on power deposition patterns, applicator efficiency, and heat transfer of the water bolus for 434 and 915 MHz applicators. Clinical feasibility was evaluated in 10 women with locoregional recurrent breast cancer. Skin surface temperatures during consecutive treatments were monitored alternatingly with either standard Amsterdam UMC thermometry or TMS. Treatments were compared using (generalized) linear mixed models. Results: The TMS did not significantly affect power deposition patterns and applicator efficiency (1–2%), the reduced heat transfer of the water boluses (51–56%) could be compensated by adjusting the water bolus flow. Skin surface temperatures were monitored reliably, and no alteration of thermal toxicity was observed compared to standard Amsterdam UMC thermometry. Conclusion: Clinical application of the TMS is feasible. Power deposition patterns and applicator efficiency were not affected. Surface temperatures were monitored reliably.

wIRA-heating of piglet skin and subcutis in vivo: proof of accordance with ESHO criteria for superficial hyperthermia

PURPOSE

The quality assurance guidelines of the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology (ESHO) specify the requirements for appropriate superficial heating using phantoms. In this current piglet study, we have examined these requirements under in vivo conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The evaluation is based on simultaneous, invasive temperature measurements at 8 different depths between 2 and 20 mm in the thigh of anesthetized piglets during irradiation with water-filtered infrared radiation (wIRA). Temperature probes were equally distributed in an area of 10 cm diameter of homogeneously irradiated skin. Piglets were irradiated to 126.5 mW cm^-2 in the spectral range of IR-A.

RESULTS

Heating rates and specific absorption rates were in full accordance with the ESHO standards. Due to early onset of thermoregulation, the desired temperature rise of 6 K at a depth of 5 mm was achieved after about 10 min of exposure, i.e. 4 min later than required for phantoms. After reaching thermal steady state, on average T ₉₀ ≥ 40 °C occurred in tissue depths up to 20 mm, T ₅₀ ≥ 41 °C up to 16 mm, and a mean CEM₄₃ T ₉₀ ≈ 1 min was calculated for depths up to 8 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Piglet data are comparable with preliminary literature data assessed in vivo in the abdominal wall and in recurrent breast cancer of humans. The potential of wIRA-HT for adequate treatment of superficial tissues/cancers in the clinical setting thus is confirmed. To ensure therapeutically needed doses of wIRA-HT, irradiation times should be extended.

Two high-resolution thermal monitoring sheets for clinical superficial hyperthermia

PURPOSE

Temperature measurement during superficial hyperthermia is limited by poor spatial resolution. We investigated two sheets to improve temperature monitoring of the skin surface.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two different sheets were studied with a grid of temperature sensors with one sensor per ~5 cm2. The first was a matrix of multisensor thermocouple probes laced through a silicone sheet. The second sheet had rows of thermistors connected by meandering copper leads mounted on stretchable printed circuit board (SPCB). Accuracy, temperature resolution and two hour stability of both sheets were investigated. Furthermore, we determined the ability to follow body contours, thermal conduction errors and electromagnetic (EM) compatibility to clinically used 434 and 915 MHz hyperthermia applicators.

RESULTS

For both sheets the accuracy (≤0.2 °C), temperature resolution (≤0.03 °C) and stability (≤0.01°C hr-1) were adequate for clinical use. Thermal conduction errors ranged from 5.25 - 11.25 mm vs. 2.15 mm for the thermocouple probe and thermistor, respectively. Both sheets could follow body contours, where the ratio air/ water bolus surface was <5%. When aligned perpendicularly to the EM field the meandering copper tracks used on the SPCB did induce self-heating, while the thermocouple probes did not. Self-heating had a linear relationship with the angle of the leads with respect to the EM field direction for both sensors at both frequencies. Self-heating of the thermistor was similar for both frequencies, while it was circa two-fold higher for 915 vs. 434 MHz for the thermocouple.

CONCLUSION

The use of SPCB technology for skin surface monitoring was promising. However, suppressing self-heating induced by the horseshoe shaped copper tracks needed for stretchability of the SPCB requires more in-depth investigation. The thermocouple matrix was the most promising for clinical application, meeting 6/7 of the major requirements for skin surface temperature monitoring when positioned perpendicular to the EM field.

Recent technological advancements in radiofrequency- andmicrowave-mediated hyperthermia for enhancing drug delivery

Hyperthermia therapy is a potent enhancer of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In particular, microwave (MW) and radiofrequency (RF) hyperthermia devices provide a variety of heating approaches that can treat most cancers regardless the size. This review introduces the physics of MW/RF hyperthermia, the current state-of-the-art systems for both localized and regional heating, and recent advancements in hyperthermia treatment guidance using real-time computational simulations and magnetic resonance thermometry. Clinical trials involving RF/MW hyperthermia as adjuvant for chemotherapy are also presented per anatomical site. These studies favor the use of adjuvant hyperthermia since it significantly improves curative and palliative clinical outcomes. The main challenge of hyperthermia is the distribution of state-of-the-art heating systems. Nevertheless, we anticipate that recent technology advances will expand the use of hyperthermia to chemotherapy centers for enhanced drug delivery. These new technologies hold great promise not only for (image-guided) perfusion modulation and sensitization for cytotoxic drugs, but also for local delivery of various compounds using thermosensitive liposomes.

Modelling Curved Contact Flexible Microstrip Applicators for Patient-Specific Superficial Hyperthermia Treatment Planning

This paper describes a method to reconstruct bendable superficial hyperthermia applicators for routine clinical patient-specific treatment planning. The reconstruction uses a CT scan with a flexible silicone dummy applicator positioned on the patient. The curvature was approximated by two second-degree polynomial functions. A realistic treatment series was mimicked using a standard Alderson radiation therapy phantom and a treatment planning model was reconstructed from a CT scan. The variation among treatment curvatures was compared to the modelled curvature. The mathematical approximation of the applicator curvature was validated for this phantom experiment, as well as for clinical treatments. The average maximum variation among the successive mimicked sessions was 3.67 ± 0.69 mm (range 2.98-4.60mm). The maximum deviation between the treatment curvature and the modelled curvature was 4.35 mm. Comparing the treatment and approximated curvature yielded a maximum deviation between 2.98 mm and 4.12 mm. For clinical treatments the maximum deviation of the treatment and approximated curvature varied between 0.48 mm and 1.98 mm. These results allow adequate reconstruction of bendable hyperthermia applicators for treatment planning, which can further improve treatment quality, for example by optimizing the water bolus temperature for patient-specific tumor depths. Predictive parameters for hyperthermia treatment outcome can easily be evaluated and compared for various input parameters.

Confirmation of thermal dose as a predictor of local control in cervical carcinoma patients treated with state-of-the-art radiation therapy and hyperthermia

BACKGROUND

Addition of deep hyperthermia results in improved local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) compared to radiotherapy alone in patients with cervical carcinoma. Previously, we showed that the thermal dose of hyperthermia significantly correlates with LC and disease specific survival (DSS). Over the last decade, new radiation techniques were introduced resulting in improved LC.

AIM

To validate the effect of thermal dose in a more recent cohort of patients treated with modern radiotherapy techniques, including image guided brachytherapy (IGBT).

METHODS

We analyzed primary cervical carcinoma patients treated with a combination of radiotherapy and deep hyperthermia between 2005 and 2016 at our institute. Data on patient, tumor and treatment were collected including the thermal dose parameters TRISE and CEM43T90. Follow-up data on LC, disease free survival, DSS, OS as well as late toxicity data were collected. Data were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

227 patients were included. In multivariate analysis, histology, FIGO stage, lymphadenopathy, TRISE, CEM43T90 and IGBT had a significant effect on LC. In the patients treated with IGBT, the thermal dose parameter TRISE remained to have a significant effect on LC in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive association between thermal dose and clinical outcome is replicated in an independent, recent cohort of cervical carcinoma patients. Importantly, in patients receiving IGBT, the effect of thermal dose on clinical outcome is still observed.

Temperature and thermal dose during radiotherapy and hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer are related to clinical outcome and thermal toxicity: a systematic review

Objective: Hyperthermia therapy (HT), heating tumors to 40-45 °C, is a known radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy sensitizer. The additional benefit of HT to RT for recurrent breast cancer has been proven in multiple randomized trials. However, published outcome after RT + HT varies widely. We performed a systematic review to investigate whether there is a relationship between achieved HT dose and clinical outcome and thermal toxicity for patients with recurrent breast cancer treated with RT + HT. Method: Four databases, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library and clinicaltrials.gov, were searched with the terms breast, radiotherapy, hyperthermia therapy and their synonyms. Final search was performed on 3 April 2019. Twenty-two articles were included in the systematic review, reporting on 2330 patients with breast cancer treated with RT + HT. Results: Thirty-two HT parameters were tested for a relationship with clinical outcome. In studies reporting a relationship, the relationship was significant for complete response in 10/15 studies, in 10/13 studies for duration of local control, in 2/2 studies for overall survival and in 7/11 studies for thermal toxicity. Patients who received high thermal dose had on average 34% (range 27%-53%) more complete responses than patients who received low thermal dose. Patients who achieved higher HT parameters had increased odds/probability on improved clinical outcome and on thermal toxicity. Conclusion: Temperature and thermal dose during HT had significant influence on complete response, duration of local control, overall survival and thermal toxicity of patients with recurrent breast cancer treated with RT + HT. Higher temperature and thermal dose improved outcome, while higher maximum temperature increased incidence of thermal toxicity.

Biophysical and photobiological basics of water-filtered infrared-A hyperthermia of superficial tumors

Thermography-controlled, water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) is a novel, effective and approved heating technique listed in the ESHO quality assurance guidelines for superficial hyperthermia clinical trials (2017). In order to assess the special features and the potential of wIRA-hyperthermia (wIRA-HT), detailed and updated information about its physical and photobiological background is presented. wIRA allows for (a) application of high irradiances without skin pain and acute grade 2-4 skin toxicities, (b) prolonged, therapeutically relevant exposure times using high irradiances (150-200 mW/cm²) and (c) faster and deeper heat extension within tissues. The deeper radiative penetration depth is mainly caused by forward Mie-scattering. At skin surface temperatures of 42-43 °C, the effective heating depth is 15 mm (T ≥ 40 °C) and 20 mm (T ≥ 39.5 °C). Advantages of wIRA include its contact-free energy input, easy power steering by a feed-back loop, extendable treatment fields, real-time and noninvasive surface temperature monitoring with observation of dynamic changes during HT, and - if necessary - rapid protection of temperature-sensitive structures. wIRA makes the compliant heating of ulcerated and/or bleeding tumors possible, allows for HT of irregularly shaped and diffusely spreading tumors, is independent of individual body contours, allows for very short 'transits' between HT and RT (1-4 min) or continuous heating between both therapeutic interventions. New treatment options for wIRA-HT may include malignant melanoma, vulvar carcinoma, skin metastases of different primary tumors, cutaneous T-and B-cell lymphoma, large-area hemangiomatosis, inoperable squamous cell, basal cell and eccrine carcinoma of the skin with depth extensions ≤20 mm.