1
|
Sanchez DN, Derks MGM, Verstijnen JA, Menges D, Portielje JEA, Van den Bos F, Bastiaannet E. Frequency of use and characterization of frailty assessments in observational studies on older women with breast cancer: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:563. [PMID: 38937703 PMCID: PMC11212278 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05152-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer and frailty frequently co-occur in older women, and frailty status has been shown to predict negative health outcomes. However, the extent to which frailty assessments are utilized in observational research for the older breast cancer population is uncertain. Therefore, the aim of this review was to determine the frequency of use of frailty assessments in studies investigating survival or mortality, and characterize them, concentrating on literature from the past 5 years (2017-2022). METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were systematically queried to identify observational studies (case-control, cohort, cross-sectional) published from 2017-2022 that focus on older females (≥ 65 years) diagnosed with breast cancer, and which evaluate survival or mortality outcomes. Independent reviewers assessed the studies for eligibility using Covidence software. Extracted data included characteristics of each study as well as information on study design, study population, frailty assessments, and related health status assessments. Risk of bias was evaluated using the appropriate JBI tool. Information was cleaned, classified, and tabulated into review level summaries. RESULTS In total, 9823 studies were screened for inclusion. One-hundred and thirty studies were included in the final synthesis. Only 11 (8.5%) of these studies made use of a frailty assessment, of which 4 (3.1%) quantified frailty levels in their study population, at baseline. Characterization of frailty assessments demonstrated that there is a large variation in terms of frailty definitions and resulting patient classification (i.e., fit, pre-frail, frail). In the four studies that quantified frailty, the percentage of individuals classified as pre-frail and frail ranged from 18% to 29% and 0.7% to 21%, respectively. Identified frailty assessments included the Balducci score, the Geriatric 8 tool, the Adapted Searle Deficits Accumulation Frailty index, the Faurot Frailty index, and the Mian Deficits of Accumulation Frailty Index, among others. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was the most used alternative health status assessment, employed in 56.9% of all 130 studies. Surprisingly, 31.5% of all studies did not make use of any health status assessments. CONCLUSION Few observational studies examining mortality or survival outcomes in older women with breast cancer incorporate frailty assessments. Additionally, there is significant variation in definitions of frailty and classification of patients. While comorbidity assessments were more frequently included, the pivotal role of frailty for patient-centered decision-making in clinical practice, especially regarding treatment effectiveness and tolerance, necessitates more deliberate attention. Addressing this oversight more explicitly could enhance our ability to interpret observational research in older cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dafne N Sanchez
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), University of Zürich, Hirschengraben 82, Zurich, CH-8001, Switzerland
| | - Marloes G M Derks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jose A Verstijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dominik Menges
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), University of Zürich, Hirschengraben 82, Zurich, CH-8001, Switzerland
| | | | - Frederiek Van den Bos
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Bastiaannet
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), University of Zürich, Hirschengraben 82, Zurich, CH-8001, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koleoso O, Toumbacaris N, Brogi E, Zhang Z, Braunstein LZ, Morrow M, Moo TA, El-Tamer M, Marine CB, Powell SN, Khan AJ. The Presence of Extensive Lymphovascular Invasion is Associated With Higher Risks of Local-Regional Recurrence Compared With Usual Lymphovascular Invasion in Curatively Treated Breast Cancer Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00625-4. [PMID: 38710417 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Several data sets have demonstrated a correlation between lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and locoregional recurrence (LRR). Whether the observation of "extensive LVI" is a further and incremental determinant of LRR risk is unknown. We describe clinical outcomes in women with invasive breast cancer stratified by (1) absence of LVI (neg), (2) LVI focal or suspicious (FS-LVI), (3) usual (nonextensive) LVI (LVI), and (4) extensive LVI (E-LVI). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between December 2009 and August 2021, 8837 patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated with curative intent and were evaluable. Clinical-pathologic details were abstracted by retrospective review. The description of LVI was abstracted from pathology reports. Recurrence and survival outcomes were compared based on the extent of LVI. A matched propensity score analysis compared outcomes between patients with LVI versus E-LVI. RESULTS Of the 8837 patients studied, 5584 were negative, 461 had FS-LVI, 2315 had LVI, and 477 had E-LVI. Patients with E-LVI had an adverse risk profile compared with the other groups. The 5- and 10-year LRR cumulative incidence estimates in patients with E-LVI were 9.6% (95% CI, 7.1-13) and 13% (95% CI, 10-17), respectively, which were significantly higher than those observed in the usual LVI group (6.8% [5.7-7.9] and 10% [8.8-12], respectively). A statistically significant difference in LRR was demonstrated in univariable (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.03-1.89; P = .029) and multivariable regression analysis (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.15-2.27; P = .005) compared with nonextensive LVI. In an alternative approach, we performed a 2:1 propensity score matching analysis comparing patients with LVI to those with E-LVI. The hazard ratio for LRR (HR, 1.47; CI 1.02-2.14; P = .041) was suggestive of a higher risk associated with E-LVI. CONCLUSIONS Our work suggests that patients with E-LVI are at a higher risk for LRR than those with usual LVI. For patients who are borderline candidates for regional nodal irradiation or post-mastectomy radiation therapy, the finding of E-LVI might be decisive in favor of intensified treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olufela Koleoso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nicolas Toumbacaris
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Edi Brogi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lior Z Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Monica Morrow
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Tracy-Ann Moo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mahmoud El-Tamer
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Catherine B Marine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Simon N Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Atif J Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kovtareva S, Kusepova L, Tazhkenova G, Mashan T, Bazarbaeva K, Kopishev E. Surface Modification of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Application in Targeted Delivery Systems of Antitumour Drugs. Polymers (Basel) 2024; 16:1105. [PMID: 38675024 PMCID: PMC11054758 DOI: 10.3390/polym16081105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The problem of tumour therapy has attracted the attention of many researchers for many decades. One of the promising strategies for the development of new dosage forms to improve oncology treatment efficacy and minimise side effects is the development of nanoparticle-based targeted transport systems for anticancer drugs. Among inorganic nanoparticles, mesoporous silica deserves special attention due to its outstanding surface properties and drug-loading capability. This review analyses the various factors affecting the cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and biocompatibility of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), constituting a key aspect in the development of safe and effective drug delivery systems. Special attention is paid to technological approaches to chemically modifying MSNs to alter their surface properties. The stimuli that regulate drug release from nanoparticles are also discussed, contributing to the effective control of the delivery process in the body. The findings emphasise the importance of modifying MSNs with different surface functional groups, bio-recognisable molecules, and polymers for their potential use in anticancer drug delivery systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Eldar Kopishev
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan; (S.K.); (L.K.); (G.T.); (T.M.); (K.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vasilyeva E, Hamm J, Nichol A, Isaac KV, Bazzarelli A, Brown C, Lohrisch C, McKevitt E. Breast-Conserving Therapy is Associated with Improved Survival Without an Increased Risk of Locoregional Recurrence Compared with Mastectomy in Both Clinically Node-Positive and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6413-6424. [PMID: 37358683 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13784-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomized trials demonstrated equivalent survival between breast-conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy (BCT) and mastectomy alone. Contemporary retrospective studies using pathological stage have reported improved survival with BCT. However, pathological information is unknown before surgery. To mimic real-world surgical decision-making, this study assesses oncological outcomes by using clinical nodal status. METHODS Female patients aged 18-69 years who were treated with upfront BCT or mastectomy between 2006 and 2016 for T1-3N0-3 breast cancer were identified by using prospective, provincial database. The patients were divided into clinically node-positive (cN+) and node-negative (cN0) strata. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the effect of local treatment type on overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and locoregional recurrence (LRR). RESULTS Of 13,914 patients, 8228 had BCT and 5686 had mastectomy. Mastectomy patients had higher-risk clinicopathological factors: pathologically positive axillary staging was 21% in BCT and 38% in mastectomy groups. Most patients received adjuvant systemic therapy. For cN0 patients, 7743 had BCT and 4794 had mastectomy. On multivariable analysis, BCT was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.37, p < 0.001) and BCSS (HR 1.32, p < 0.001), whereas LRR was not different between the groups (HR 0.84, p = 0.1). For cN+ patients, 485 had BCT and 892 had mastectomy. On multivariable analysis, BCT was associated with improved OS (HR 1.46, p = 0.002) and BCSS (HR 1.44, p = 0.008), whereas LRR was not different between the groups (HR 0.89, p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS In the era of contemporary systemic therapy, BCT was associated with better survival than mastectomy, without an increased risk of locoregional recurrence for both cN0 and cN+ presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizaveta Vasilyeva
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | | | - Alan Nichol
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kathryn V Isaac
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amy Bazzarelli
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Carl Brown
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Caroline Lohrisch
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Elaine McKevitt
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
English K, Alcorn SR, Tran HT, Smith KL, Wilkinson M, Hirose KT, O'Donnell M, Croog V, Wright JL. Adjuvant treatment decisions among adults aged 65 years and older with early-stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer seen in a simple multidisciplinary clinic versus standard consultation. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101503. [PMID: 37126898 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomized studies support de-escalation of adjuvant therapy for a target population of older adults ≥65 years with stage I, estrogen-receptor (ER) positive breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. We sought to evaluate the impact of a simplified multidisciplinary clinic (s-MDC) in this population by comparing treatment patterns and patient perceptions of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and hormone therapy (HT) between patients seen in s-MDC vs. standard consultations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients in the above target population who underwent surgery between August 2020 and May 2022 at our institution. Two cohorts were included: (1) patients seen in s-MDC, and (2) patients seen in standard clinic separately by medical and radiation oncology (non-s-MDC cohort). The non-s-MDC patients declined, could not attend, and/or were not referred to the s-MDC. Patients in the s-MDC cohort were prospectively administered validated questionnaires to evaluate patient reported data including the Decision Autonomy Preference Scale (DAPS), e-Prognosis, and Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Scale (MMS). Chi square, t-tests, and non-parametric equivalents compared demographics, and logistic regression evaluated RT and HT use and survey score outcomes between cohorts. RESULTS A total of 127 patients met inclusion criteria, with 33 s-MDC and 94 non-s-MDC patients. There was no difference between the cohorts in age, margin status, histology, grade, or focality. In the s-MDC cohort there were significantly more patients without sentinel lymph node biopsy (71.3% vs 42.4%, p = 0.003) and mean tumor size was smaller (0.69 vs. 0.96 cm, p < 0.003), and Charlson comborbidity index (CCI) was higher (5.21 vs 4.96, p = 0.038). There was no significant difference in receipt of RT (65% s-MDC vs 77% standard; odds ratio [OR] = 0.55, p = 0.189), HT (78% ss-MDC vs 72% standard; OR = 1.36, p = 0.513), or both (50% s-MDC vs 59% standard; OR = 0.7, p = 0.429). The s-MDC cohort was significantly more likely to undergo accelerated (vs. standard hypofractionated) RT (70% vs 39%; OR = 3.59, p = 0.020). In s-MDC patients with completed questionnaires (n = 33), all whose selected "mostly patient (n=6)" based decision making by DAPS chose RT while all "mostly doctor (n=1)" chose no RT. Based on e-Prognosis, there were lower odds of RT for increasing Schonberg score/ higher 10 yr mortality risk (OR 0.600, p = 0.048). MMS score ≥ 40 ("maximizer") was strongly linked with the use of RT (OR 18.57, p = 0.011). DISCUSSION For adults ≥65 years with early stage, ER positive breast cancer, s-MDC participation was not significantly associated with lower use of adjuvant RT or HT versus standard consultation but was significantly associated with shorter RT courses. DAPS and MMS results indicate that patient treatment preference may be predictable, highlighting an opportunity to tailor consultation discussions and recommendations based on intrinsic patient preferences and individual goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keara English
- The Johns Hopkins Department of Radiation Oncology, 401 North Broadway, Weinberg Building, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - Sara R Alcorn
- The Johns Hopkins Department of Radiation Oncology, 401 North Broadway, Weinberg Building, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - Hanh-Tam Tran
- The Johns Hopkins Department of Radiation Oncology, 401 North Broadway, Weinberg Building, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - Karen Lisa Smith
- The Johns Hopkins Department of Radiation Oncology, 401 North Broadway, Weinberg Building, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - Mary Wilkinson
- The Johns Hopkins Department of Radiation Oncology, 401 North Broadway, Weinberg Building, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - Kelly Tadken Hirose
- The Johns Hopkins Department of Radiation Oncology, 401 North Broadway, Weinberg Building, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - Maureen O'Donnell
- The Johns Hopkins Department of Radiation Oncology, 401 North Broadway, Weinberg Building, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - Victoria Croog
- The Johns Hopkins Department of Radiation Oncology, 401 North Broadway, Weinberg Building, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America
| | - Jean L Wright
- The Johns Hopkins Department of Radiation Oncology, 401 North Broadway, Weinberg Building, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shah C, Leonardi MC. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: An Opportunity for Therapeutic De-escalation. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:2-6. [PMID: 36255336 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Partial breast irradiation (PBI) has been demonstrated to have comparable outcomes to whole breast irradiation based on multiple randomized trials with long-term follow-up. However, despite the strength of the data available, PBI remains underutilized despite being an appropriate option for many women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. This is significant, as PBI offers the potential to reduce toxicities and shorten treatment duration without impacting outcomes; in addition, for low-risk patients, PBI alone is being investigated as an alternative to endocrine therapy alone. Modern PBI can be delivered with multiple techniques, and advances in treatment planning have allowed for improved therapeutic ratios compared with earlier techniques; one such approach is utilizing stereotactic body radiation therapy approaches allowing for smaller target margins and therefore lower breast doses. Moving forward, studies are ongoing evaluating the use of radiation alone including PBI as compared with endocrine therapy alone, with prospective studies evaluating stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Maria C Leonardi
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miller K, Kreis IA, Gannon MR, Medina J, Clements K, Horgan K, Dodwell D, Park MH, Cromwell DA. The association between guideline adherence, age and overall survival among women with non-metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 104:102353. [PMID: 35152157 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Conformity with treatment guidelines should benefit patients. Studies have reported variation in adherence to breast cancer (BC) guidelines, particularly among older women. This study investigated (i) whether adherence to treatment guideline recommendations for women with non-metastatic BC improves overall survival (OS), (ii) whether that relationship varies by age. METHODOLOGY MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for studies on guideline adherence and OS in women with non-metastatic BC, published after January 2000, which examined recommendations on breast surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or endocrine therapy. Study results were summarised using narrative synthesis. RESULTS Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The recommendations for each treatment covered were similar, but studies differed in their definitions of adherence. 5-year OS rates among patients having compliant treatment ranged from 91.3% to 93.2%, while rates among patients having non-compliant treatment ranged from 75.9% to 83.4%. Six studies reported an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for non-compliant treatment compared with compliant treatment; all concluded OS was worse among patients whose overall treatment was non-compliant (aHR range: 1.52 [1.30-1.82] to 2.57 [1.96-3.37]), but adjustment for potential confounders was limited. Worse adherence among older women was reported in 12/16 studies, but they did not provide consistent evidence on whether OS was associated with treatment adherence and age. CONCLUSIONS Individual studies reported that better adherence to guidelines improved OS among women with non-metastatic BC, but the evidence base has weaknesses including inconsistent definitions of adherence. More precise and consistent research designs, including the evaluation of barriers to adherence across the spectrum of healthcare practice, are required to fully understand guideline compliance, as well as the relationship between compliance and OS following a BC diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Miller
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK; Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Irene A Kreis
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Melissa R Gannon
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK; Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jibby Medina
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Karen Clements
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS Digital, 2(nd) Floor, 23 Stephenson Street, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kieran Horgan
- Department of Breast Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - David Dodwell
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Min Hae Park
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK; Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - David A Cromwell
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK; Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhong YM, Tong F, Shen J. Lympho-vascular invasion impacts the prognosis in breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:102. [PMID: 35073848 PMCID: PMC8787911 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09193-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background It is estimated that breast cancer (BC) incidence, especially that of early-stage breast cancer cases continues to rise due to increased universal screening. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the main intervention for early-stage BC. Lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) is reported to influence breast cancer prognosis but its prognostic value in breast-conserving treatment is controversial. Methods A search was conducted on the Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE from inception to December 1st, 2021, without language restrictions, to identify studies that explored the prognosis of lympho-vascular invasion in breast-conserving surgery. Reviews of each study were conducted, and data extracted. The meta-analysis was performed with StataSE 16. Study quality assessment was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results Overall, 15 studies with 21,704 patients deemed eligible for this study. Event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), distant metastases (DM), loco-regional recurrence (LRR), local recurrence (LR), breast recurrence (BR), disease specific survival (DSS), and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), were extracted from each study. We found that LVI leads to poor OS (HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.17–1.83), DM (HR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.66–2.60) and LR (HR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.54–2.61). Conclusions We confirmed that early-stage BC patients with LVI-positive have poorer OS, DFS, LRR, BCSS, DM and LR following receiving BCS than those LVI-negative patients. Mastectomy, in combination with radical systemic therapies could be considered, especially in those requiring second surgery. How to change the impact of LVI on the local recurrence rate and long-term survival in patients who undergo BCS may be a valuable research direction in the future. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09193-0.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rassu PC. Breast surgical oncology in elderly and unfit patients: a systematic review. Minerva Surg 2021; 76:538-549. [PMID: 34935322 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.21.08995-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer treatment in elderly women remains a complex issue due to pre-existing comorbidities, therapy-related toxicities, and the lack of evidence-based data in this population, leading to both overtreatment and undertreatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The aim was to investigate the literature on breast surgical oncology in the older woman as a major therapeutic challenge: the 86 more consistent articles amongst 1440 potential citations according to PRISMA guidelines were retained. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Studies demonstrated that despite low-grade tumor types, lower incidence of axillary lymph node involvement, ER+ disease, and less aggressive tumor biology, elderly breast cancer patients often receive less than the standard-of-care when compared to their younger counterparts. The surgery omission in elderlies and the preference for the primary endocrine treatment is associated with worse survival, especially in patients aged 80 years or over - a cohort with no specific recommendations concerning breast and axillary surgical procedures. On the other hand, a higher mastectomy rate is still considered the standard treatment in older women with higher T2:T1 tumor ratio and greater difficulties to attend radiotherapy due to severe comorbidities. Surgical de-escalation procedures even in an-ambulatory setting are recognized as a feasible option in these patients to prevent or palliate breast or chest wall symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Benefits and disadvantages from surgery only or coupled with adjuvant therapies for elderly women were analyzed in literature, outlining a growing need for a proper geriatric assessment and short-stay surgical programs which are feasible today owing to the availability of less invasive approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier C Rassu
- Department of General Surgery, S. Giacomo Hospital, Novi Ligure, Alessandria, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Experiences and Perceptions of Older Adults with Lower-Risk Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer about Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Endocrine Therapy: A Patient Survey. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:5215-5226. [PMID: 34940075 PMCID: PMC8700141 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28060436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Older patients with lower-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer are frequently offered both radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A survey was performed to assess older patients’ experiences and perceptions regarding RT and ET, and participation interest in de-escalation trials. Of the 130 patients approached, 102 eligible patients completed the survey (response rate 78%). The median age of respondents was 74 (interquartile range 71–76). Most participants (71%, 72/102) received both RT and ET. Patients felt the role of RT and ET, respectively, was to: reduce ipsilateral tumor recurrence (91%, 90/99 and 62%, 61/99) and improve survival (56%, 55/99 and 49%, 49/99). More patients had significant concerns regarding ET (66%, 65/99) than RT (39%, 37/95). When asked which treatment had the most negative effect on their quality of life, the results showed: ET (35%, 25/72), RT (14%, 10/72) or both (8%, 6/72). Participants would rather receive RT (57%, 41/72) than ET (43%, 31/72). Forty-four percent (44/100) of respondents were either, “not comfortable” or “not interested” in participating in potential de-escalation trials. Although most of the adjuvant therapy de-escalation trials evaluate the omission of RT, de-escalation studies of ET are warranted and patient centered.
Collapse
|
11
|
Savard MF, Clemons M, Hutton B, Jemaan Alzahrani M, Caudrelier JM, Vandermeer L, Liu M, Saunders D, Sienkiewicz M, Stober C, Cole K, Shorr R, Arnaout A, Chang L. De-escalating adjuvant therapies in older patients with lower risk estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 99:102254. [PMID: 34242928 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET) are standard treatments for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, many older patients are at greater risk of treatment-related toxicities and non-cancer related death, and less likely to benefit from these standard treatments. A systematic review was performed evaluating outcomes of omitting RT or ET in older patients aged ≥50 treated with BCS for lower-risk breast cancer. METHODS Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were queried from 1980 to April 30th, 2020 for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (PCSs) evaluating omission of RT and/or ET compared to RT plus ET in patients. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models with findings reported as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS From 3860 citations, 10 prospective studies met eligibility criteria. Omission of RT alone was evaluated in 7 RCTs (n = 4604) and one PCS (n = 667); omission of ET alone was assessed in 1 PCS (n = 271); and omission of either ET or RT was compared to ET plus RT in 1 RCT (n = 495). Adjuvant RT compared to no RT reduced 5- and 10-year in-breast tumor recurrence [5-year: RR 0.16, 95 %CI 0.09-0.27 l 10-year: 0.28, 95 %CI 0.16-0.5], but had no effect on survival [5-year: RR 0.94, 95 %CI 0.77-1.15; 10-year: 1.01, 95 %CI 0.9-1.12]. CONCLUSION The current body of evidence suggests that RT can be omitted in older patients with lower-risk disease. However, more trials on the omission of ET are required to better inform treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-France Savard
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - Mark Clemons
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Meshari Jemaan Alzahrani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jean-Michel Caudrelier
- Department of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lisa Vandermeer
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Michelle Liu
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Deanna Saunders
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Marta Sienkiewicz
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Carol Stober
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Katherine Cole
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Angel Arnaout
- Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lynn Chang
- Department of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McKevitt E, Cheifetz R, DeVries K, Laws A, Warburton R, Gondara L, Lohrisch C, Nichol A. Sentinel Node Biopsy Should Not be Routine in Older Patients with ER-Positive HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Who Are Willing and Able to Take Hormone Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5950-5957. [PMID: 33817760 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09839-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The SSO Choosing Wisely campaign recommended selective sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative women aged ≥ 70 years with ER+ breast cancer. We sought to assess the association of SLNB positivity, adjuvant treatment, and survival in a population-based cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women aged ≥ 70 years treated for ER+ HER2- breast cancer between 2010 and 2016 were identified in our prospective provincial database. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of SLNB positivity with use of adjuvant treatments and survival outcomes. RESULTS We identified 2662 patients who met study criteria. SLNB was positive in 25%. Increased use of chemotherapy (ChT), hormone therapy (HT), and radiotherapy (RT) was significantly associated with SLNB positivity. Five-year OS was 86%, and BCSS was 96% with median follow-up of 4.3 years. BCSS was worse with grade 3 disease (HR 4.1, 95% CI 2.1-8.1, p < 0.0001) and better with HT (HR 0.5 95% CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.01). Patients with a positive SLNB treated without adjuvant therapy had lower BCSS (HR 3.2 95% CI 1.2-8.4, p = 0.017) than those with a negative SLNB, but patients with a positive SLNB treated with any combination of ChT, HT, and/or RT, had similar BCSS to those with a negative SLNB. CONCLUSIONS BCSS in this population was excellent at 96%, and BCSS was similar with negative and positive SLNB when patients received HT. SLNB can be omitted in elderly patients willing to take HT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine McKevitt
- Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,Department of Surgery, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada. .,Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Rona Cheifetz
- Department of Surgery, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Alison Laws
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rebecca Warburton
- Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Surgery, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Caroline Lohrisch
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Alan Nichol
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Breast cancer in women aged 75 years and older - tumour characteristics and treatment options. MENOPAUSE REVIEW 2021; 20:14-20. [PMID: 33935615 PMCID: PMC8077806 DOI: 10.5114/pm.2021.104432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction An optimal approach to older women with breast cancer is still a major challenge. In this paper, we present a retrospective analysis of treatment in patients aged 75 years and older who were treated at the Holycross Cancer Centre in 2015–2019. Material and methods The analysed group consisted of 259 women. For estimation of the general status of patients, we used the Geriatric 8 questionnaire. For every patient, an individual treatment plan was established. Survival analysis was performed; disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival, and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. For DFS and OS, the Cox proportional-hazard regression was applied. Results The mean age in the analysed group was 80 years. Stage I and II cancer accounted for over 80% of patients. Radical mastectomy was performed in 56% and breast-conserving surgery in over 34% of patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was used in 114 patients. Preoperative systemic treatment was applied in 34 and postoperative chemotherapy in 51 patients, respectively. Trastuzumab was used in 23 patients. Postoperative hormonal therapy was applied in 205 and radiotherapy in 178 patients. During the observation after the treatment 32 patients died, while 227 survived. In multivariate analysis for DFS hormonotherapy was statistically significant for OS clinical stage and hormonotherapy. Conclusions The treatment plan for older women consisted of surgery and radiation therapy, and systemic treatment should be always considered. The decision should be made by the breast cancer team.
Collapse
|
14
|
Adoption and effectiveness of de-escalated radiation and endocrine therapy strategies for older women with low-risk breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:731-740. [PMID: 33551323 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent clinical trials support de-escalation of adjuvant radiation therapy following lumpectomy in some older women with low-risk HR+ breast cancers planning to take endocrine therapy. The adoption of these findings into clinical practice, and the effectiveness of de-escalated therapy in real-world populations, remain under investigation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated use of adjuvant radiation therapy and/or endocrine therapy among older women with T1-2 node-negative, HR+ breast cancer in the United States between 2007 and 2011. The study included patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database and the North Carolina Cancer Information and Population Health Resource database. RESULTS Radiation therapy was received by 65.5% of patients, with no decrease over time. Older women and those with T2 (compared to T1) tumors were less likely to receive radiation therapy. In propensity-adjusted analyses, both radiation therapy alone (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84) and radiation + endocrine therapy (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54-0.69) were associated with significantly lower recurrence risk compared to endocrine therapy alone. Non-adherence to endocrine therapy was common (37%) and similar across groups. With a median follow-up of 48 months (range 13-84), we were not able to detect an association of non-adherence with recurrence risk in endocrine therapy-containing treatment arms. CONCLUSION Most older women with stage I HR+ breast cancers continue to receive radiation, at higher rates than patients with node-negative stage II tumors. These findings suggest that while multiple evidence-based treatment options exist in these patients, improvements are needed to ensure that radiation therapy is applied equitably and rationally.
Collapse
|
15
|
Wei M, Wang X, Zimmerman DN, Burt LM, Haaland B, Henry NL. Endocrine therapy and radiotherapy use among older women with hormone receptor-positive, clinically node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 187:287-294. [PMID: 33420863 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06071-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine patterns of radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET) use, associations between RT omission and ET adherence, and associations among ET and RT use and disease recurrence in older women with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. METHODS Women age 65 and older diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, clinically node-negative breast cancer between 2005 and 2018 and who did not undergo mastectomy were included. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the trends in practice patterns over time and by age. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate the probability of ET discontinuation. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess associations between recurrence and ET/RT. RESULTS Of the 484 enrolled patients, 47.9% patients underwent RT and initiated ET, 27.4% received ET alone, 10.2% received RT alone, and 13.8% patients received neither. Older patients had a higher probability of receiving ET alone or neither ET nor RT (both p < 0.001). The probability of initiating ET was greater among patients who underwent RT than those who omitted RT (p < 0.001). Regardless of RT status (RT or no RT), initiation and continuation of ET may be associated with reduced risk of recurrence. CONCLUSION Patients who opt for no adjuvant therapy, or who do not tolerate ET, are at increased risk of disease recurrence if they omit RT. Clinicians should consider the likelihood a patient will adhere to ET prior to recommending omission of RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Wei
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Xuechen Wang
- Population Health Science, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Danielle N Zimmerman
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, 85 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Lindsay M Burt
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Benjamin Haaland
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.,Population Health Science, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - N Lynn Henry
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. .,Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. .,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 500 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. .,Rogel Cancer Center, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ganguly S, Naik D, Muskara A, Mian OY. The Nexus of Endocrine Signaling and Cancer: How Steroid Hormones Influence Genomic Stability. Endocrinology 2021; 162:bqaa177. [PMID: 33260197 PMCID: PMC7707372 DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqaa177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Endocrine-driven malignancies, including breast and prostate cancer, are among the most common human cancers. The relationship between sex steroid hormones (eg, androgen, estrogen, and progesterone), their cognate receptors, and genomic stability lie at the center of endocrine-driven cancer development, progression, and therapeutic resistance. A variety of direct and indirect mechanisms have been described that link steroid hormone signaling to the loss of genomic integrity that drives early carcinogenesis. These effects are often enriched within endocrine receptor cistromes, accounting for the high proportion of mutations and rearrangements in the region of hormone response elements. In other cases, the effects are generalized and rely on a complex array of genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic interactions. Both androgen and estrogen receptors directly modulate the DNA damage response by trans-activating DNA damage response genes and redirecting the cellular repair machinery in the wake of genotoxic stress. Here we review the key mechanistic underpinnings of the relationship between sex steroid hormone receptors and genomic stability. In addition, we summarize emerging research in this area and discuss important implications for cancer prevention and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Divya Naik
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Andrew Muskara
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Omar Y Mian
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cortina CS. De-Escalation of Local-Regional Therapy for Older Breast Cancer Patients. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-020-00395-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
18
|
Laws A, Cheifetz R, Warburton R, McGahan CE, Pao JS, Kuusk U, Dingee C, Quan ML, McKevitt E. Nodal staging affects adjuvant treatment choices in elderly patients with clinically node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Curr Oncol 2020; 27:250-256. [PMID: 33173376 PMCID: PMC7606038 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In response to Choosing Wisely recommendations that sentinel lymph node biopsy (slnb) should not be routinely performed in elderly patients with node-negative (cN0), estrogen receptor-positive (er+) breast cancer, we sought to evaluate how nodal staging affects adjuvant treatment in this population. Methods From a prospective database, we identified patients 70 or more years of age with cN0 breast cancer treated with surgery for er+ her2-negative invasive disease during 2012-2016. We determined rates of, and factors associated with, nodal positivity (pN+), and compared the use of adjuvant radiation (rt) and systemic therapy by nodal status. Results Of 364 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 331 (91%) underwent slnb, with 75 (23%) being pN+. Axillary node dissection was performed in 11 patients (3%). On multivariate analysis, tumour size was the only factor associated with pN+ (p = 0.007). Nodal positivity rates were 0%, 13%, 23%, 33%, and 27% for lesions preoperatively sized at 0-0.5 cm, 0.5-1 cm, 1.1-2.0 cm, 2.1-5.0 cm, and more than 5.0 cm. Compared with patients assessed as node-negative, those who were pN+ were more likely to receive axillary rt (lumpectomy: 53% vs. 1%, p < 0.001; mastectomy: 43% vs. 2%, p < 0.001), and adjuvant systemic therapy (endocrine: 82% vs. 69%; chemotherapy plus endocrine: 7% vs. 2%, p = 0.002). Conclusions Of elderly patients with cN0 er+ breast cancer, 23% were pN+ on slnb. Size was the primary predictor of nodal status, and yet significant rates of nodal positivity were observed even in tumours preoperatively sized at 1 cm or less. The use of rt and systemic adjuvant therapies differed by nodal status, although the long-term oncologic implications require further investigation. Multidisciplinary input on a case-by-case basis should be considered before omission of slnb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Laws
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - R Cheifetz
- Department of Surgery, BC Cancer, University of British Columbia
| | - R Warburton
- Department of Surgery, BC Cancer, University of British Columbia
- Department of Surgery, Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia
| | - C E McGahan
- Population Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - J S Pao
- Department of Surgery, Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia
| | - U Kuusk
- Department of Surgery, Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia
| | - C Dingee
- Department of Surgery, Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia
| | - M L Quan
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - E McKevitt
- Department of Surgery, BC Cancer, University of British Columbia
- Department of Surgery, Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Joseph K, Zebak S, Alba V, Mah K, Au C, Vos L, Ghosh S, Abraham A, Chafe S, Wiebe E, Liu HW, Chambers C, Gabos Z, Tankel K, Lupichuk S, King K. Adjuvant breast radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, or both after breast conserving surgery in older women with low-risk breast cancer: Results from a population-based study. Radiother Oncol 2020; 154:93-100. [PMID: 32941956 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The relative benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) alone in older women with low-risk early breast cancer (EBC) remains unclear. It is hypothesized that adjuvant RT-alone can improve outcomes of older patients with low-risk EBC, similar to endocrine therapy (ET) alone or combination of RT + ET. METHODS In this population based study, we identified all women aged ≥70 with T1-2, N0, ER+ve, Her-2/neu-ve EBC treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS), followed by adjuvant treatments (RT-alone, ET-alone, or RT + ET combination) from 2005 to 2015. Primary outcome measures were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS). Treatment details were collected and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was calculated. RESULTS A total of 1166 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 76.5 months. Adjuvant treatments: BCS only 130 (11%), RT 378 (32.5%), ET 161 (14%), and RT + ET 497 (42.5%). Less than 60% of women completed 5-years of ET. Compared to BCS alone, RT resulted in significant improvement in RFS (HR = 0.174; p < 0.001), similar to ET (HR = 0.414; p = 0.007) and RT + ET (HR = 0.236; p < 0.001). Determinants of OS were age, tumor grade, comorbidities, and adjuvant therapy. Increased comorbidity scores (0 vs. 1; 0 vs. ≥2) were associated with reduced OS (HR = 1.40; p = 0.013 and HR = 1.98; p < 0.001), without impact on RFS or BCSS. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant RT-alone is a reasonable alternative to ET or RT + ET for older women with biologically favorable EBC. No difference in RFS or BCSS was noted between RT, ET, and RT + ET. Comorbidity was independently associated with reduced overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurian Joseph
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada.
| | | | | | - Kayla Mah
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Cara Au
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Larissa Vos
- Alberta Cancer Clinical Trials, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Aswin Abraham
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Susan Chafe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Ericka Wiebe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | | | - Zsolt Gabos
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Keith Tankel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Sasha Lupichuk
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Calgary & Tom Baker Cancer Center, Canada
| | - Karen King
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shah C, Bauer-Nilsen K, McNulty RH, Vicini F. Novel radiation therapy approaches for breast cancer treatment. Semin Oncol 2020; 47:209-216. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
21
|
Radiation and/or endocrine therapy? Recurrence and survival outcomes in women over 70 with early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 182:411-420. [PMID: 32441018 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05691-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women over 70 with early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery are typically offered adjuvant endocrine and radiation therapy. Prior studies have supported the omission of adjuvant radiation in this low-risk population. We sought to compare the effect of adjuvant treatment with endocrine therapy alone, radiation therapy alone or both versus no adjuvant treatment on local control and survival in this population. METHODS Data were extracted on 1363 breast cancer patients over the age of 70 treated with a breast-conserving surgery from 2003 until 2018. 460 patients met inclusion criteria of pT1N0, invasive disease with negative margins and not treated with chemotherapy. The primary outcome of this population-based study was local recurrence-free survival at 5 and 10 years. RESULTS Patients receiving no adjuvant therapy had worse local recurrence-free, loco-regional recurrence-free and disease-free survival than patients receiving at least one form of adjuvant therapy (p < 0.05). 5-year local recurrence rates were 0.8% in patients receiving both endocrine and radiation therapy, 1.5% in those receiving radiation alone, 4.2% in those receiving endocrine therapy alone and 12% in those receiving no adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS This study supports the benefit of some form of adjuvant therapy (radiation alone, endocrine therapy alone or both) in low-risk breast cancer patients over 70. Receiving no adjuvant therapy is associated with poorer outcomes. Many of these patients are candidates for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation which can be completed in less than a week. These patients should be offered radiation therapy, endocrine therapy or both.
Collapse
|
22
|
Radiation Therapy Without Hormone Therapy for Women Age 70 or Above with Low-Risk Early Breast Cancer: A Microsimulation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:296-306. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
23
|
Effectiveness of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in older patients with T1-2N0 breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 178:637-645. [PMID: 31451977 PMCID: PMC6817758 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05412-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In the Netherlands, radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is omitted in up to 30% of patients aged ≥ 75 years. Although omission of radiotherapy is considered an option for older women treated with endocrine treatment, the majority of these patients do not receive systemic treatment following Dutch treatment guidelines. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of omission of radiotherapy on locoregional recurrence risk in this patient population. Methods Patients aged ≥ 75 years undergone BCS for T1-2N0 breast cancer diagnosed between 2003 and 2009 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. To minimize confounding by indication, hospital variation was used to assess the impact of radiotherapy-use on locoregional recurrence risk using cox proportional hazards regression. Hazards ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. Results Overall, 2390 patients were included. Of the patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, 39.3% received endocrine treatment. Five-year incidences of locoregional recurrence were 1.9%, 2.8%, and 3.0% in patients treated at hospitals with higher (average radiotherapy-use 96.0%), moderate (88.0%), and lower radiotherapy-use (72.2%) respectively, and nine-year incidences were 2.2%, 3.1%, and 3.2% respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios were 1.46 (95% CI 0.77–2.78) and 1.50 (95% CI 0.79–2.85) for patients treated at hospitals with moderate and lower radiotherapy-use, compared to patient treated at hospitals with higher radiotherapy-use. Conclusions Despite endocrine treatment in only 39.3%, locoregional recurrence risk was low, even in patients treated at hospitals with lower radiotherapy-use. This provides reasonable grounds to consider omission of radiotherapy in patients aged ≥ 75 years with T1-2N0 breast cancer. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05412-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Breast cancer incidence and mortality increase with age. Older patients (≥ 70) are often excluded from studies. Due to multiple factors, it is unclear whether this population is best-treated using standard guidelines. Here, we review surgical management in older women with breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Geriatric assessments can guide treatment recommendations and aid in predicting survival and quality of life. Surgery remains a principal component of breast cancer treatment in older patients, though differences exist compared with younger women, including higher mastectomy rates and evidence-based support of omission of post-lumpectomy radiation or axillary dissection in subsets of patients. In those forgoing surgical management, there is increased use of endocrine therapy. Hospice is also a valuable element of end-of-life care. Physicians should utilize geriatric assessment to make treatment recommendations for older breast cancer patients, including omission of radiation therapy, alterations to standard surgeries, or enrollment in hospice care.
Collapse
|
25
|
Wu SG, Zhang WW, Wang J, Dong Y, Sun JY, Chen YX, He ZY. 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Outcomes of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Elderly Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1. [PMID: 30761267 PMCID: PMC6361832 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: To assess the role of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay on decision-making of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in elderly women with early-stage breast cancer. Methods: The 21-gene RS for elderly (≥65 years) women with stage T1-2N0M0 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who underwent BCS from 2004 to 2015 was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. We estimated the association of 21-gene RS and adjuvant RT related to breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) using propensity score matching (PSM). Results: We identified 18,456 patients, of which 15,326 (83.0%) received postoperative RT. Of identified patients, 58.9, 34.0, and 7.1% of patients had a low-, intermediate-, and high-risk RS, respectively. Receipt of postoperative RT was not related to the year of diagnosis according to the 21-gene RS groups. Multivariate analysis suggested that receipt of postoperative RT was an independent predictor of better BCSS before (hazard ratio [HR] 0.587, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.426-0.809, P = 0.001) and after (HR 0.613, 95%CI 0.390-0.963, P = 0.034) PSM. However, subgroups analyses indicated that receipt of postoperative RT was related to better BCSS in women with intermediate-risk RS before (HR 0.467, 95%CI 0.283-0.772, P = 0.003) and after (HR 0.389, 95%CI 0.179-0.846, P = 0.017) PSM, but not in women with low- and high-risk RS groups before and after PSM. Conclusions: Although causation cannot be implied, adjuvant RT in elderly women was associated with a greater effect size in patients with an intermediate-risk RS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- San-Gang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China
| | - Wen-Wen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yong Dong
- Department of Oncology, Dongguan Third People's Hospital, Affiliated Dongguan Shilong People's Hospital of Southern Medical University, Dongguan, China
| | - Jia-Yuan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong-Xiong Chen
- Eye Institute of Xiamen University, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Medical College, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Zhen-Yu He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
O'Sullivan CC, Loprinzi CL, Haddad TC. Updates in the Evaluation and Management of Breast Cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 2018; 93:794-807. [PMID: 29866283 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. More than 200,000 new cases of invasive breast cancer are diagnosed annually in the United States; approximately 40,000 patients die of the disease. The etiology of most breast cancer cases is unknown, although multiple factors predisposing to the disease have been identified. Apart from increasing age and female sex, these other factors account for only a minority of breast cancer diagnoses. This article provides an overview of the management of noninvasive and invasive breast cancer, which is often complex and varies according to patient factors, disease stage, and breast cancer subtype. Although much progress has been made, continued research endeavors are ongoing; enrollment of eligible patients in prospective clinical trials is an essential way to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tufia C Haddad
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Peppercorn J, Jimenez R. Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Omission of Radiation Therapy for Select Women Aged >70 Years With Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:918-921. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|