1
|
Briere TM, Agrusa JE, Martel MK, Jackson A, Olch AJ, Ronckers CM, Kremer LCM, Constine LS, McAleer MF. Acute and Late Pulmonary Effects After Radiation Therapy in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:533-548. [PMID: 35525723 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) pulmonary task force reviewed dosimetric and clinical factors associated with radiation therapy (RT)-associated pulmonary toxicity in children. METHODS Comprehensive search of PubMed (1965-2020) was conducted to assess available evidence and predictive models of RT-induced lung injury in pediatric cancer patients (<21 years old). Lung dose for radiation pneumonitis (RP) was obtained from dose-volume histogram (DVH) data. RP grade was obtained from standard criteria. Clinical pulmonary outcomes were evaluated using pulmonary function tests (PFTs), clinical assessment, and questionnaires. RESULTS More than 2,400 abstracts were identified; 460 articles had detailed treatment and toxicity data; and 11 articles with both detailed DVH and toxicity data were formally reviewed. Pooled cohorts treated during 1999 to 2016 included 277 and 507 patients age 0.04 to 22.7 years who were evaluable for acute and late RP analysis, respectively. After partial lung RT, there were 0.4% acute and 2.8% late grade 2, 0.4% acute and 0.8% late grade 3, and no grade 4 to 5 RP. RP risk after partial thoracic RT with mean lung dose (MLD) <14 Gy and total lung V20Gy <30% is low. Clinical and self-reported pulmonary outcomes data included 8,628 patients treated during 1970 to 2013, age 0 to 21.9 years. At a median 2.9- to 21.9-year follow-up, patients were often asymptomatic; abnormal PFTs were common and severity correlated with lung dose. At ≥10-year follow-up, multi-institutional studies suggested associations between total or ipsilateral lung doses >10 Gy and pulmonary complications and deaths. After whole lung irradiation (WLI), pulmonary toxicity is higher; no dose response relationship was identified. Bleomycin and other chemotherapeutics at current dose regimens do not contribute substantially to adverse pulmonary outcomes after partial lung irradiation but increase risk with WLI. CONCLUSIONS After partial lung RT, acute pulmonary toxicity is uncommon; grade 2 to 3 RP incidences are <1%. Late toxicities, including subclinical/asymptomatic impaired pulmonary function, are more common (<4%). Incidence and severity appear to increase over time. Upon review of available literature, there appears to be low risk of pulmonary complications in children with MLD < 14 Gy and V20Gy <30% using standard fractionated RT to partial lung volumes. A lack of robust data limit guidance on lung dose/volume constraints, highlighting the need for additional work to define factors associated with RT-induced lung injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Marie Briere
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer E Agrusa
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Mary K Martel
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Department of Pediatrics, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Medical University Brandenburg Medical School-Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Department of Pediatrics, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics, UMC Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Louis S Constine
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parekh AD, Indelicato DJ, Hoppe BS, Vega RBM, Rotondo RL, Bradley JA. Pulmonary dose tolerance in hemithorax radiotherapy for Ewing sarcoma of the chest wall: Are we overestimating the risk of radiation pneumonitis? Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e29287. [PMID: 34398486 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with chest wall Ewing sarcoma with malignant pulmonary effusion or pleural stranding require hemithorax radiation, often with plans that exceed lung constraints. We investigated disease control and pneumonitis in children requiring hemithorax radiation. PROCEDURE Eleven children (median age 13 years) received hemithorax radiotherapy. Symptomatic radiation pneumonitis was considered National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1+ with respiratory symptoms. Mean lung dose (MLD), volume of lung exposed to a dose ≥5 Gy (V5), ≥20 Gy (V20), and ≥35 Gy (V35) were recorded. Adult and pediatric lung constraints were obtained from Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) guidelines and Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocols, respectively. RESULTS Median hemithorax dose was 15 Gy (1.5 Gy/fraction). Median total dose was 51 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction). Most plans delivered both protons and photons. The ipsilateral MLD, V5, and V20 were 27.2 Gy, 100%, and 48.3%; the bilateral MLD, V20, and V35 were 14.1 Gy, 22.8%, and 14.3%, respectively. One hundred percent, 36%, and 91% of treatments exceeded recommended adult ipsilateral lung constraints of V5 <65%, V20 <52%, and MLD of 22 Gy; 64%, 45%, and 82% exceeded COG bilateral lung constraints of V20 <20%, MLD <15 Gy, and MLD <12 Gy, respectively; 82% of treatments exceeded the COG ipsilateral lung constraint of V20 <30%. At a median 36 months (range 12-129), the symptomatic radiation pneumonitis incidence was 0%. Two patients progressed with nonpulmonary metastatic disease and died at a median 12 months following radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Existing guidelines may overestimate pneumonitis risk, even among young children receiving multiagent chemotherapy. For children with chest wall Ewing sarcoma and other thoracic malignancies, more data are needed to refine pediatric dose-effect models for pulmonary toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akash D Parekh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Raymond B Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Ronny L Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hall MD, Terezakis SA, Lucas JT, Gallop-Evans E, Dieckmann K, Constine LS, Hodgson D, Flerlage JE, Metzger ML, Hoppe BS. Radiotherapy across pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma research group protocols: a report from the Staging, Evaluation, and Response Criteria Harmonization (SEARCH) for childhood, adolescent, and young adult Hodgkin lymphoma (CAYAHL) Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:317-334. [PMID: 34390770 PMCID: PMC8802654 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
| | | | - John T Lucas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Eve Gallop-Evans
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - David Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jamie E Flerlage
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Monika L Metzger
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Current Situation of Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: From Expectations to Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153746. [PMID: 34359647 PMCID: PMC8345146 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Consolidative radiation therapy (RT) is of prime importance for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) management since it significantly increases progression-free survival (PFS). Nevertheless, first-generation techniques, relying on large irradiation fields, delivered significant radiation doses to critical organs-at-risk (OARs, such as the heart, to the lung or the breasts) when treating mediastinal HL; consequently, secondary cancers, and cardiac and lung toxicity were substantially increased. Fortunately, HL RT has drastically evolved and, nowadays, state-of-the-art RT techniques efficiently spare critical organs-at-risks without altering local control or overall survival. Recently, proton therapy has been evaluated for mediastinal HL treatment, due to its possibility to significantly reduce integral dose to OARs, which is expected to limit second neoplasm risk and reduce late toxicity. Nevertheless, clinical experience for this recent technique is still limited worldwide. Based on current literature, this critical review aims to examine the current practice of proton therapy for mediastinal HL irradiation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Tseng YD, Hoppe BS, Dedeckova K, Patel CG, Hill-Kayser CE, Miller DM, Maity A, Mendenhall NP, Mailhot Vega RB, Yock TI, Baliga S, Hess CB, Winkfield KM, Mohindra P, Rosen LR, Tsai H, Chang J, Hartsell WF, Plastaras JP. Risk of Pneumonitis and Outcomes After Mediastinal Proton Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma: A PTCOG and PCG Collaboration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:220-230. [PMID: 32866566 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite high response rates, there has been reluctance to use radiation therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin (HL) or aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) given concerns for subacute and late toxicities. Symptomatic pneumonitis, a subacute toxicity, has an incidence of 17% to 24% (≥grade 2) even with intensity modulated radiation therapy. Proton therapy (PT), which has no exit radiation dose, is associated with a lower dose to lung compared with other radiation techniques. As risk of radiation pneumonitis is associated with lung dose, we evaluated whether pneumonitis rates are lower with PT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Within an international, multi-institutional cohort, we retrospectively evaluated the incidence and grade of radiation pneumonitis (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4) among patients with r/r HL or NHL treated with PT. RESULTS A total of 85 patients with r/r lymphoma (66% HL, 34% NHL; 46% primary chemorefractory) received thoracic PT from 2009 to 2017 in the consolidation (45%) or salvage (54%) setting. Median dose was 36 Gy(RBE). Before PT, patients underwent a median of 1 salvage systemic therapy (range, 0-4); 40% received PT within 4 months of transplant. With a median follow-up of 26.3 months among living patients, 11 patients developed symptomatic (grade 2) pneumonitis (12.8%). No grade 3 or higher pneumonitis was observed. Dose to lung, including mean lung dose, lung V5, and V20, significantly predicted risk of symptomatic pneumonitis, but not receipt of brentuximab, history of bleomycin toxicity, sex, or peritransplant radiation. CONCLUSIONS PT for relapsed/refractory lymphoma was associated with favorable rates of pneumonitis compared with historical controls. We confirm that among patients treated with PT, pneumonitis risk is associated with mean lung and lung V20 dose. These findings highlight how advancements in radiation delivery may improve the therapeutic ratio for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. PT may be considered as a treatment modality for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma in the consolidation or salvage setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville, Illinois.
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Chirayu G Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Christine E Hill-Kayser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David M Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amit Maity
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nancy P Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Raymond B Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Clayton B Hess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Karen M Winkfield
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville, Illinois; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lane R Rosen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis-Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Lousiana
| | - Henry Tsai
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville, Illinois; Procure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - John Chang
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville, Illinois; Oklahoma Proton Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - William F Hartsell
- Proton Collaborative Group Registry Membership Site, Warrenville, Illinois; Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Greenberger BA, Yock TI. The role of proton therapy in pediatric malignancies: Recent advances and future directions. Semin Oncol 2020; 47:8-22. [PMID: 32139101 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy has promised an advantage in safely treating pediatric malignancies with an increased capability to spare normal tissues, reducing the risk of both acute and late toxicity. The past decade has seen the proliferation of more than 30 proton facilities in the United States, with increased capacity to provide access to approximately 3,000 children per year who will require radiotherapy for their disease. We provide a review of the initial efforts to describe outcomes after proton therapy across the common pediatric disease sites. We discuss the main attempts to assess comparative efficacy between proton and photon radiotherapy concerning toxicity. We also discuss recent efforts of multi-institutional registries aimed at accelerating research to better define the optimal treatment paradigm for children requiring radiotherapy for cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mailhot Vega RB, Hoppe BS. A positive approach: advances in proton therapy for the treatment of mediastinal lymphoma. Expert Rev Hematol 2020; 13:197-200. [PMID: 31976780 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1713745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond B Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Fl, USA
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
O'steen L, Bellardini J, Cury J, Jones L, Seeram VK, Mendenhall NP, Hoppe BS. Pulmonary Function after Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma. Int J Part Ther 2019; 5:1-4. [PMID: 31788502 PMCID: PMC6874186 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-18-00040.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Acute and late toxicity from chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiation therapy can cause significant morbidity among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), including pulmonary dysfunction. Improved dosimetry may influence pulmonary function tests (PFTs), an objective and clinically significant measure of pulmonary toxicity. The present study investigates the impact of proton therapy on PFTs among HL survivors. Patients and Methods: We monitored 15 patients with mediastinal HL who were enrolled in an institutional HL trial. All patients were treated with combination chemotherapy plus involved-node proton therapy. All patients were to undergo PFTs before starting treatment and at approximately 6 and 12 months after completing proton therapy. Results: Twelve patients were included in the analysis and 3 excluded. The mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was 96.2% ± 16.5% (mean ± SD) predicted at baseline and 98.2% ± 19.4% predicted at 12 months. The mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 96.7% ± 17.2% predicted at baseline and 97% ± 15.1% predicted at 12 months. The mean FEV1/FVC ratio was 99.5 ± 8.29 at baseline and 97.8 ± 8.02 at 12 months. The mean diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was 81.4% ± 18.4% predicted at baseline and 95.7% ± 23.5% predicted at 12 months. Conclusion: No unexpected changes were observed to the lungs as illustrated through follow-up PFTs. Long-term follow-up and validation in a larger cohort are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lillie O'steen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jason Bellardini
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - James Cury
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Lisa Jones
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Vandana K Seeram
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Nancy P Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The advent of proton beam therapy (PBT) has initiated a paradigm shift in the field of pediatric radiation oncology, with increasing promise to alleviate both short-term and long-term toxicities. Given the dramatic rise in proton therapy centers in the United States, a discussion of the quality of evidence supporting its use in pediatric cancers is warranted. RECENT FINDINGS Proton radiotherapy appears to decrease the incidence and severity of late effects with the strongest evidence in pediatric brain tumor cohorts that shows benefits in neurocognitive, hearing, and endocrine outcomes. However, emerging data has shown that more conservative brainstem dose limits with protons compared with photons are required to limit brainstem toxicity; these modified recommendations have been incorporated into national cooperative group studies. Decreased toxicity in tumors outside of the CNS for PBT have also been reported in sarcomas, Hodgkin disease and neuroblastoma. Similarly, QoL outcomes are improved in brain tumor and other cohorts of patients treated with PBT. SUMMARY The collective findings demonstrate improved understanding and refinement of PBT in pediatric cancers. Data on QOL, toxicity and disease outcomes with PBT should continue to be collected and reported in order to understand the full extent of the risks and benefits associated with PBT.
Collapse
|
10
|
Dabaja BS, Hoppe BS, Plastaras JP, Newhauser W, Rosolova K, Flampouri S, Mohan R, Mikhaeel NG, Kirova Y, Specht L, Yahalom J. Proton therapy for adults with mediastinal lymphomas: the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group guidelines. Blood 2018; 132:1635-1646. [PMID: 30108066 PMCID: PMC6212652 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-03-837633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Among adult lymphoma survivors, radiation treatment techniques that increase the excess radiation dose to organs at risk (OARs) put patients at risk for increased side effects, especially late toxicities. Minimizing radiation to OARs in adults patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas involving the mediastinum is the deciding factor for the choice of treatment modality. Proton therapy may help to reduce the radiation dose to the OARs and reduce toxicities, especially the risks for cardiac morbidity and second cancers. Because proton therapy may have some disadvantages, identifying the patients and the circumstances that may benefit the most from proton therapy is important. We present modern guidelines to identify adult lymphoma patients who may derive the greatest benefit from proton therapy, along with an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of proton treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bouthaina Shbib Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Wayne Newhauser
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, LA
| | - Katerina Rosolova
- Proton Therapy Department, Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - N George Mikhaeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and
| | - Joachim Yahalom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Proton therapy for pediatric malignancies: Fact, figures and costs. A joint consensus statement from the pediatric subcommittee of PTCOG, PROS and EPTN. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:44-55. [PMID: 29937209 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of childhood cancer, with the primary aim of achieving the highest likelihood of cure with the lowest risk of radiation-induced morbidity. Proton therapy (PT) provides an undisputable advantage by reducing the radiation 'bath' dose delivered to non-target structures/volume while optimally covering the tumor with tumoricidal dose. This treatment modality comes, however, with an additional costs compared to conventional radiotherapy that could put substantial financial pressure to the health care systems with societal implications. In this review we assess the data available to the oncology community of PT delivered to children with cancer, discuss on the urgency to develop high-quality data. Additionally, we look at the advantage of combining systemic agents with protons and look at the cost-effectiveness data published so far.
Collapse
|