A Phase 3 Trial of Pelvic Radiation Therapy Versus Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy Followed by Paclitaxel/Carboplatin Chemotherapy in Patients with High-Risk, Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Gynecology Oncology Group Study

Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma of no-specific-molecular-profile with multiple bone metastases and muscle involvement: Case report and review of the literature

Bone metastasis and muscular involvement in endometrial carcinoma are rare, and information on molecular profiles of endometrial carcinoma with bone metastasis is scarce. We present a case of an 83-year old woman with a poorly differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma of no-specific-molecular-profile with para-aortic lymph node involvement, who underwent surgery, received adjuvant chemotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy but declined external beam radiotherapy. Fifteen months after the initial diagnosis she presented with pain in her right leg. Imaging showed an osteolytic lesion in the right femur with soft-tissue involvement. She underwent an open biopsy and protective osteosynthesis. Histologically, infiltrates of both bone and muscle were consistent with metastasis derived from endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. She received concomitant palliative chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy to the right femur. Eleven months later, she presented with an acute hemiparesis caused by a right-sided subacute, superior frontal gyrus infarct, which also showed aggressive bone metastasis of the left sphenoid bone. She subsequently died 2 weeks later. This is a rare case of multiple bone metastases and muscle involvement in endometrial carcinoma. To our knowledge, this is the first reported such case in endometrial carcinoma showing no-specific-molecular-profile.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma

A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multi-disciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.

Adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews and interprets studies on adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer published during the last 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

For patients with intermediate and high intermediate risk endometrial cancer, vaginal brachytherapy remains the adjuvant therapy of choice. New molecular markers might help to define patients in this group for whom observation only is sufficient and women who might have benefitted from external beam radiotherapy. Preliminary results from large randomized controlled trials have shown that in early stage, high-risk endometrial cancer the addition of chemotherapy to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) did not improve survival. The combination of vaginal brachytherapy with three courses of chemotherapy resulted in similar progression-free and overall survival (3 years) as EBRT. In stage III high-risk endometrial cancer, the addition of chemotherapy to EBRT improved failure-free survival but not overall survival (immature data). Chemotherapy alone had the same efficacy concerning progression-free and overall survival (immature data).

SUMMARY

Three large randomized clinical trials on the role of adjuvant radio and/or chemotherapy have so far provided only immature results. Discussions about changes of clinical practice should be postponed until mature data from all three trials are available. The impact of new molecular markers for risk stratification will be assessed in ongoing RCTs.

Off-study utilization of experimental therapies: Analysis of GOG249-eligible cohorts using real world data

OBJECTIVE

Adjuvant management of women with high-intermediate- and high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer remains controversial. Recently published results of GOG 249 revealed that vaginal brachytherapy plus chemotherapy (VBT + CT) was not superior to whole pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT) and was associated with more toxicities and higher nodal recurrences. This study examined off-study utilization of VBT + CT among women who met criteria for GOG 249 in the period prior to study publication.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with FIGO IA-IIB endometrioid, serous, or clear cell uterine cancer between 2004-2015 and treated with hysterectomy and radiotherapy (RT) were identified in the National Cancer Database. Cochrane-Armitrage trend test was used to assess trends over time. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to calculate odds ratio (OR) of VBT + CT receipt and hazard ratio (HR) of OS. Propensity-score matched analysis was conducted to account for baseline differences.

RESULTS

9956 women met inclusion criteria. 7548 women (75.8%) received WPRT while 2408 (24.2%) received VBT + CT in the study period. From 2004-2015, there was a significant increase in VBT + CT use (p < 0.001) with the largest overall increase occurring in 2009 to 22%. Factors significantly associated with VBT + CT receipt included higher socioeconomic status (p < 0.001), higher grade endometrioid cancer (p < 0.001), and aggressive histology (p < 0.001). After propensity-score matching, VBT + CT was associated with improved OS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.93); however, when stratified by FIGO stage, VBT + CT was only associated with improved OS for FIGO stage 1B (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant use of experimental arm off-study treatment in the United States prior to report of GOG 249 results. Providers should be cautious when offering off-study treatment utilizing an experimental regimen given uncertainty about efficacy and toxicity.

Updates on adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for endometrial cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article will provide an opinion on adjuvant treatment of stage I-III endometrial cancer based on existing and evolving evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

For early-stage (I and II) intermediate risk endometrial cancer, vaginal brachytherapy reduces the risk of locoregional relapse. Recent studies have investigated the use of chemotherapy in early stage, high-risk patient population, but did not demonstrate a survival benefit. As such, chemotherapy is only recommended for selected patients at high risk for distant recurrence. On the other hand, for stage III disease, chemotherapy has a well established role. A landmark trial recently reported confirmed that chemoradiation improves recurrence-free survival compared with radiation alone in stage III endometrial cancer. However, in another randomized phase III trial, chemoradiotherapy was not superior to chemotherapy alone in this group, raising questions as to whether addition of radiation is necessary. Therefore, improved risk stratification using molecular markers in addition to traditional pathological criteria is critically needed to better predict the risk of local and systemic recurrence and to assist therapy decision-making.

SUMMARY

Endometrial cancer care is evolving and recent pivotal trials highlight the significance of chemotherapy to the treatment of stage III endometrial cancer and not to the approach for stage I and II cancer. The role of radiation therapy for stage III disease is raised into question.

Using the Radiosensitivity Index (RSI) to Predict Pelvic Failure in Endometrial Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Variability exists in the adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer (EC) based on surgical pathology and institutional preference. The radiosensitivity index (RSI) is a previously validated multigene expression index that estimates tumor radiosensitivity. We evaluate RSI as a genomic predictor for pelvic failure (PF) in EC patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using our institutional tissue biorepository, we identified EC patients treated between January 1999 and April 2011 with primarily endometrioid histology (n = 176; 86%) who received various adjuvant therapies. The RSI 10-gene signature was calculated for each sample using the previously published algorithm. Radiophenotype was determined using the previously identified cutpoint where RSI ≥ 0.375 denotes radioresistance (RR) and RSI < 0.375 describes radiosensitivity.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients were identified, of which 83 (41%) were treated with adjuvant RT. Median follow-up was 38.5 months. All patients underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with the majority undergoing lymph node dissection (n = 181; 88%). In patients treated with radiation, RR tumors were more likely to experience PF (3-year pelvic control 84% vs 100%; P = .02) with worse PF-free survival (PFFS) (3-year PFFS 65% vs 89%; P = .04). Furthermore, in the patients who did not receive RT, there was no difference in PF (P = .87) or PFFS (P = .57) between the RR/radiosensitive tumors. On multivariable analysis, factors that continued to predict for PF included the RR phenotype (hazard ratio [HR], 12.2; P = .003), lymph node involvement (HR, 4.4; P = .02), and serosal or adnexal involvement (HR, 5.3; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

On multivariable analysis, RSI was found to be a significant predictor of PF in patients treated with adjuvant RT. We propose using RSI to predict which patients are at higher risk for failing in the pelvis and may be candidates for treatment escalation in the adjuvant setting.

Contemporary management of uterine clear cell carcinoma: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) review and recommendation

Uterine clear cell cancer (UCCC) is a rare but aggressive disease. Due to its rarity, large, prospective studies focused on UCCC are exceedingly difficult therefore available data are generally from small, retrospective studies. There is also pertinent information from subsection analysis of larger studies that include UCCC and other histotypes. In 2009, the clinical practice committee of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) published a review on UCCC aimed at guiding management. Since that publication, there have been developments which are relevant to UCCC, these include availability of data from landmark trials regarding adjuvant therapy, increasing utilization of sentinel lymph node approach and availability of immunotherapy as a treatment option. This SGO review is updated with all relevant, published information since 2009 considered clinically important for management of UCCC. In addition, it follows the new SGO's style for this type of publication which includes utilization of the question and answer format.

Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, and its incidence is rising. Although there have been significant recent advances in our understanding of endometrial cancer biology, many aspects of treatment remain mired in controversy, including the role of surgical lymph node assessment and the selection of patients for adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy. For the subset of women with microsatellite-instable, metastatic disease, anti- programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and numerous trials are attempting to build on this early success.

Adjuvant combined-modality therapy for stage IIIC endometrioid and non-endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To identify the optimal adjuvant treatment regimen for patients with endometrioid and non-endometrioid node-positive endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 249 women with FIGO 2009 stage IIIC endometrial cancer at our institution who underwent surgical staging from 1985 to 2015 followed by external beam radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT), or a combination of CT + RT. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate for all patients was 65%. Adjuvant CT + RT conferred higher rates of 5-year DSS as compared to CT alone in patients with grade 3 endometrioid and non-endometrioid tumors (61% vs. 27%, P = 0.04 and 67% vs. 38%, P = 0.02, respectively). Among patients with non-endometrioid tumors, treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by additional sequential chemotherapy had higher 5-year DSS rates than with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone (74% vs. 50%, P = 0.02). The 3-year pelvic recurrence rate was 5% with RT ± CT and 35% with CT alone (P < 0.001) for all patients. No paraaortic nodal failures were observed following extended-field RT, but 14% of patients who received pelvic-only RT or CT alone developed recurrences in the paraaortic nodes (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined-modality therapy including adjuvant external beam pelvic radiotherapy yields excellent outcomes for patients with all subtypes of node-positive endometrial cancer. The most pronounced DSS advantage from adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was evident in women with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Do vaginal recurrence rates differ among adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy regimens in early-stage endometrial cancer?

PURPOSE

We sought to retrospectively examine clinical outcomes for three adjuvant vaginal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy regimens after hysterectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Included were women of all ages from two independent hospital systems diagnosed with Stage I-II endometrial cancer of any grade between 2000 and 2016 who underwent hysterectomy followed by adjuvant vaginal cylinder HDR brachytherapy with either 7.0 Gy × 3 fractions prescribed to 0.5 cm vaginal depth, 6.5 Gy × 3 fractions prescribed to 0.5 cm vaginal depth, or 6.0 Gy × 5 fractions prescribed to the vaginal surface. Outcomes included vaginal recurrence (VR), pelvic recurrence, distant recurrence, locoregional recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 348 women, 45 (13%) received 7.0 Gy × 3 fractions, 259 (74%) received 6.5 Gy × 3 fractions, and 44 (13%) received 6.0 Gy × 5 fractions. Women receiving 5-fraction brachytherapy were more likely to be younger with a higher performance status. At a median follow-up of 4.5 years, VR rates were 2.2%, 0.8%, and 4.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant differences in the risks for VR among brachytherapy regimens. Risks for VR, pelvic recurrence, distant recurrence, locoregional recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival did not differ between propensity score-matched five- and 3-fraction brachytherapy cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

VR rates after hysterectomy and adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer were low and not significantly different by HDR dose fractionation.

Cancer of the corpus uteri

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in high-income countries. Although the overall prognosis is relatively good, high-grade endometrial cancers have a tendency to recur. Recurrence needs to be prevented since the prognosis for recurrent endometrial cancer is dismal. Treatment tailored to tumor biology is the optimal strategy to balance treatment efficacy against toxicity. Standard treatment consists of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Lymphadenectomy (with ongoing studies of sentinel node biopsy) enables identification of lymph node positive patients who need adjuvant treatment, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy is used for Stage I-II patients with high-risk factors and Stage III lymph node negative patients. In advanced disease, a combination of surgery to no residual disease and chemotherapy results in the best outcome. Surgery for recurrent disease is only advocated in patients with a good performance status with a relatively long disease-free interval.

Does adjuvant concurrent or sequential chemotherapy increase the radiation-related toxicity of vaginal brachytherapy for endometrial cancer patients?

PURPOSE

To compare radiation toxicity in endometrial cancer patients treated with adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) vs. VBT with concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) or sequential chemotherapy (SCT) METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 131 patients with endometrial cancer treated with VBT without external beam radiation therapy. Toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. CCT was defined as VBT delivered between the first and last cycle of chemotherapy (CT); SCT was defined as VBT delivered before or after CT.

RESULTS

Median followup was 36 months, with a 3-year survival rate of 88%. Of the 131 patients, 92 were treated with VBT alone, 34 with VBT and CCT, and 5 with VBT and SCT. The most common toxicity was vaginal stricture, with 30 (22.9%) patients affected. The distribution of toxicities was vaginal 28%, urinary 12%, rectal 11%, and fatigue 5%; none greater than Grade 2. Compared with patients treated with VBT alone, the addition of CT did not increase the chance of vaginal stricture formation (p = 0.84). The difference in system-specific toxicities between treatment modalities was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The most common pelvic toxicity from VBT is vaginal stenosis with other toxicities being infrequent and generally Grade 1. The addition of CT in a sequential or concurrent fashion did not increase the rate of pelvic toxicity from VBT alone.

Clinicopathologic Features and Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Stage I, High-Risk Histology or High-Grade Endometrial Cancer after Primary Staging Surgery: A Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

To investigate the clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes in patients with stage I, high-risk endometrial cancer. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I, papillary serous, clear cell, or grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma treated between 2000 and 2012 were analyzed for the clinical and pathological factors in relation to prognosis. A total of 267 patients (stage IA; n = 175, stage IB; n = 92) were included. Among the clinicopathological features, stage and age were significant prognostic factors. The recurrence rate and overall survival for stage IB versus IA were 22.8% versus 9.1% (p = 0.003) and 149.7 months versus 201.8 months (p < 0.001), respectively. The patients >60 years of age also had a higher recurrence rate (21.7% versus 9.7%, p = 0.008) and poorer survival (102.0 months versus 196.8 months, p = 0.001) than those ≤60 years of age. Distant recurrence (64.9%) occurred more frequently than local recurrence (24.3%) and local combined with distant recurrence (10.8%) (p < 0.001). The postoperative treatment modality had no impact on tumor recurrence rate, recurrence site, or overall survival. Distant recurrence is a major cause of treatment failure in patients with stage I, high-risk endometrial cancer. However, current adjuvant treatment appeared to have little effect in preventing its occurrence.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in high-risk endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefits of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for high-risk endometrial cancer (HREC) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I-III remain controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of postoperative CRT over radiotherapy (RT) alone, exclusively for patients with HREC for the following key endpoints: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), the local recurrence rate, the distant metastasis rate, cancer-specific survival (CSS), grade III/IV acute and late toxicities, and the small bowel obstruction rate.

METHODS

Five databases, namely, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov, were systematically explored and supplemented by manual searching to identify relevant studies published before Dec 9, 2017. Only prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted for HREC comparing CRT and RT alone after surgery were included. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan Version 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Six eligible trials involving 2105 patients were identified for the final meta-analysis (CRT: n = 1064; RT: n = 1041). No statistically significant differences were evident between the CRT and RT groups regarding OS (n = 2105, RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.98-1.06, P = 0.40). Additionally, no differences were apparent in terms of the local recurrence rate (n = 690, RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.19-1.18, P = 0.11) or distant metastasis rate (n = 1445, RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.72-1.23, P = 0.67). However, CRT significantly prolonged overall five-year PFS (80.2% vs. 74.5%, +5.7%; RR = 1.08, P = 0.005) and five-year CSS (86.1% vs. 79.0%, +7.1%; RR = 1.09, P = 0.03). A higher incidence of grade III/IV toxicities (P < 0.00001) was evident with CRT, while grade III/IV late toxicities and the small bowel obstruction rate were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with endometrial cancers with stage I-III risk factors, adjuvant CRT can significantly improve PFS and CSS compared with RT. With the exception of increased acute toxicities, CRT is well accepted and tolerated in HREC patients.