Patterns of Failure in Patients With Double Hit or Double Expressor Lymphomas: Implications for Radiation Therapy

Radiation Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: What Is the Right Regimen for Palliation?

Purpose

To report objective response rates (ORR), time to local failure (TTLF), and overall survival (OS) among patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after salvage- or palliative-intent radiation therapy (RT) and to investigate whether outcomes differed with conventional versus hypofractionated (≥2.5 Gy/fraction) RT.

Methods and Materials

A single-institution observational cohort study was performed for patients who completed a course of RT for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma between January 1, 2008, and April 1, 2020. Predictors of ORR, TTLF, and OS were calculated using univariable and multivariable regression models. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate TTLF and OS, and log-rank analysis was used to compare outcomes. Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was calculated using an α/β of 10.

Results

One-hundred and sixty-nine patients were treated with 205 RT courses (73 [36%] salvage, 132 [64%] palliative), and hypofractionated RT was used in 100 RT courses (49%). Median RT dose was 30 Gy (range, 8-60 Gy). ORR was 60% for the total cohort (53% and 69% for palliative and salvage cohorts, respectively). Over a median follow-up time of 4 months, median OS in all patients was 5 months (3 and 22 months for palliative and salvage cohorts, respectively). No statistically significant differences in ORR, TTLF, and OS were observed with hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation. EQD2 ≥35 Gy was associated with improved ORR (odds ratio, 3.79 [1.19-12.03]; P = .024) and prolonged TTLF (0.39 [0.18-0.87]; P = .022), while double-hit receptor status (8.18 [1.08-62.05]; P = .042), cell of origin (3.87 [1.17-8.74]; P = .0012), and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm; 2.12 [1.18-3.81]; P = .012) were associated with inferior TTLF. In the palliative-only cohort, a low-dose regimen of 8 Gy in 2 fractions was associated with similar ORR compared with other fractionation schema but trended towards inferior TTLF (P = .36).

Conclusions

Hypofractionation is not associated with differences in disease outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, while higher RT dose (EQD2 ≥35 Gy) may improve ORR and TTLF. Future work is warranted to elucidate the ideal dose and fractionation schema for such patients who will likely also undergo novel systemic agents and cellular therapies.

Palliative Radiotherapy for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Recent improvements in chemoimmunotherapies, targeted agents, hematopoietic stem cell transplants, and cellular therapies have revolutionized treatment paradigms for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Even in the relapsed or refractory setting, contemporary treatment options are delivered with curative intent and can lead to lasting remissions. Although such therapies have improved overall outcomes, they have increasingly led to a wide variety of presentations of recurrent tumors in need of palliation. Here, we review the use of radiotherapy (RT) in the palliation of DLBCL. We draw particular attention to the evolving role for hypofractionated RT and low-dose RT for DLBCL. We review the available literature on these topics and focus on commonly encountered clinical scenarios.

Perspectives on chemotherapy for the management of double-hit lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

. Unlike most B-cell lymphomas, they have poor response to standard R-CHOP therapy, tend to quickly develop resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapies, and are associated with higher central nervous system (CNS) infiltration. This can lead to increased risk of relapse and worse prognosis. DHL/THL represent a subset of lymphomas with unmet medical need.

AREA COVERED

The authors present the available data for the current treatment regimens including intensive chemotherapy regimens, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), and CNS prophylaxis. They also discuss treatment for relapsed disease including targeted therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

There is currently no accepted standard of care for DHL/THL. For frontline therapy, we recommend enrollment in a well-designed clinical trial if possible, otherwise DA-EPOCH-R with CNS prophylaxis is a commonly used first-line therapy. The authors recommend close surveillance for patients achieving complete response, but for those who fail to achieve a complete response, then clinical trials, more aggressive salvage chemotherapy regimens, or cellular therapies are usually considered.

Current perspectives on the treatment of double hit lymphoma

Introduction: Double hit lymphoma (DHL) represents a new diagnostic category with genetic, immunohistochemical and clinical characteristics intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma. Patients with DHL usually experience poor survival after frontline R-CHOP treatment and require alternative therapies. However, the ideal therapeutic options remain undefined. Areas covered: Traditional therapies for the treatment of DHL are discussed, including intensive induction, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), methotrexate CNS-directed prophylaxis, and radiation therapy. The authors further introduce small-molecule inhibitors targeting myc or bcl-2 signaling pathways, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody and immunomodulatory drugs as novel approaches. Expert opinion: No standard treatment exists for DHL. At present, DA-EPOCH-R exhibits an upfront induction option. Central nervous system prophylaxis with methotrexate is recommended as part of the induction therapy. For those who do not obtain complete remission, HSCT or clinical trials should be considered. Targeted approaches, especially chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and small-molecule inhibitors targeting myc or bcl-2, exhibit the potential of improving outcomes for patients with DHL. High-throughput sequencing is a promising technique both at diagnosis and relapse, in order to predict outcomes and potential novel therapies.

Radiotherapy for early stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with or without double or triple hit genetic alterations

We investigated whether adding radiation (RT) to systemic therapy improved outcomes in early stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with or without double- or triple-hit lymphoma (DHL/THL) biology. This analysis included 183 patients profiled with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for alterations in MYC, BLC2, and/or BCL6. A total of 146 (80%) were non-DHL/THL, 27 (15%) were DHL, and 10 (6%) were THL. Systemic therapy without RT resulted in inferior freedom from relapse (FFR) (HR: 2.28; 95% CI, 1.10-4.77; p = .02). The median FFR for non-DHL/THL was not reached and was 33 and 22.3 months for DHL and THL, respectively; p < .001. Low-risk (R-IPI <2) DHL/THL patients treated with rituximab-based therapy had 3-year FFR rates of 11% and 71% for systemic therapy without and with RT, respectively; p = .04. No differences in overall survival were observed between the treatment groups. Treatment intensification with RT may improve early stage DHL/THL outcomes.