1
|
Le Guevelou J, Cuccia F, Flippot R, Ferrera G, Terlizzi M, Zilli T, De Crevoisier R, Hannoun-Levi JM, Supiot S, Sargos P, Pasquier D. The current landscape of stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-024-00862-8. [PMID: 38898265 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00862-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The onset of castration-resistance is associated with dismal outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Metastasis directed therapy has been investigated in multiple disease settings and may improve outcomes in selected patients. Our systematic review aims to summarize evidence with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS The literature search was performed on March 2024, on Pubmed, using the keywords "SBRT" AND "CRPC", and "stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)" AND "CRPC". This search retrieved a total of 108 articles, 19 were included. RESULTS The literature is largely dominated by retrospective series. In men with metachronous oligoprogression, SBRT with androgen receptor pathway inhibitor significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) including biochemical progression-free survival in a randomized phase II trial (hazard ratio of 0.35, p < 0.001). In patients continuing ADT, the bPFS ranged between 9.5 months to 17.9 months, and next systemic treatment-free survival (NEST-FS) reached up to 2 years. In men with induced oligoprogression, SBRT enabled NEST-FS up to 3 years. SBRT was well tolerated, with less than 5% grade 3 toxicity reported across studies. CONCLUSION In the population of patients with oligometastatic CRPC, SBRT enables long-term biochemical response and PFS. In the oligoprogressive setting, SBRT could be integrated to prolong the duration and efficacy of systemic therapies. Nevertheless, the level of evidence remains very low and inclusion within prospective trials remain the preferred option for this population of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Department of Radiation Therapy, ARNAS Civico Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ronan Flippot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Department of Radiation Therapy, ARNAS Civico Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mario Terlizzi
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Stephane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
- Lille University, CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miller ED, Klamer BG, Cloyd JM, Pawlik TM, Williams TM, Hitchcock KE, Romesser PB, Mamon HJ, Ng K, Gholami S, Chang GJ, Anker CJ. Consideration of Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expert Survey and Systematic Review. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2024; 23:160-173. [PMID: 38365567 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was conducted to identify factors used to consider metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey to assess clinical factors when weighing MDT in patients with mCRC was developed based on systematic review of the literature and integrated with clinical vignettes. Supporting evidence from the systematic review was included to aid in answering questions. RESULTS Among 75 experts on mCRC invited, 47 (response rate 62.7%) chose to participate including 16 MOs, 16 ROs, and 15 SOs. Most experts would not consider MDT in patients with 3 lesions in both the liver and lung regardless of distribution or timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (6 vs. 36 months after definitive treatment). Similarly, for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node and lung and liver involvement, most experts would not offer MDT regardless of timing of metastatic disease diagnosis. In general, SOs were willing to consider MDT in patients with more advanced disease, ROs were more willing to offer treatment regardless of metastatic site location, and MOs were the least likely to consider MDT. CONCLUSIONS Among experts caring for patients with mCRC, significant variation was noted among MOs, ROs, and SOs in the distribution and volume of metastatic disease for which MDT would be considered. This variability highlights differing opinions on management of these patients and underscores the need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to characterize the risks and potential benefits of MDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
| | - Brett G Klamer
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology at the Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Harvey J Mamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Sepideh Gholami
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cuccia F, Pastorello E, Franzese C, Belgioia L, Bignardi M, Federico M, Figlia V, Giaj Levra N, Badellino S, Borghetti P, Marvaso G, Montesi G, Pontoriero A, Fazio I, Ferrera G, Alongi F, Scorsetti M. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spine Oligometastases: A Multicentre Retrospective Study From the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:794-800. [PMID: 37714793 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine oligometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a multicentre retrospective study of a series of patients who received SBRT for spine oligometastases. The efficacy of SBRT was evaluated in terms of local control as the primary endpoint. Survival outcomes were also analysed to identify predictive factors for clinical outcomes. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS Between March 2018 and July 2022, 183 lesions in 177 patients were analysed. In most patients, SBRT was delivered to a single spine metastasis (82%) for a median total dose of 21 Gy (14-35 Gy) in three fractions (one to five fractions) and a median BED10 = 119 Gy (57.7-152 Gy). Local control rates were 90.3% at 1 year, 84.3% at 2 years and 84.3% at 3 years. Distant progression-free survival rates were 33.1%, 18.5% and 12.4% at 1, 2 and 3 years, with prostate histology (P = 0.023), oligorecurrent disease (P = 0.04) and BED10 > 100 Gy (P = 0.04) found to be predictive on univariate analysis. A further oligometastatic progression was observed in 33 patients (18.6%) treated with a second course of SBRT, reporting at univariate analysis improved overall survival rates (P = 0.01). Polymetastases-free survival rates were 57.8%, 43.4% and 32.4%; concurrent therapy was related to improved outcomes at multivariate analysis (P = 0.009). Overall survival rates were 91.8%, 79.6% and 65.9%, with prostate histology and non-cervical metastases related to better overall survival at multivariate analysis. Pain-flare after SBRT was recorded in 3.3%; five patients underwent surgical decompression after SBRT; there were no grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS In our experience of only oligometastatic patients, spine SBRT gave excellent results in terms of safety and efficacy. Prostate histology and oligorecurrent disease were predictive factors for improved clinical outcomes; also, patients who experienced a further oligoprogression after SBRT maintained a survival advantage compared with polymetastatic progression. No severe adverse events were reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Cuccia
- Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
| | - E Pastorello
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy
| | - C Franzese
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Milan, Italy
| | - L Belgioia
- Radiation Oncology Department, San Martino Teaching Hospital, Genova University (DISSAL), Genoa, Italy
| | - M Bignardi
- Radiation Oncology Center, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Federico
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Clinica Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - V Figlia
- Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - N Giaj Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy
| | - S Badellino
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - P Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - G Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - G Montesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - A Pontoriero
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental and Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - I Fazio
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Clinica Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - G Ferrera
- Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - F Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klement RJ, Sweeney RA. Metabolic factors associated with the prognosis of oligometastatic patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2023; 42:927-940. [PMID: 37261610 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-023-10110-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, it has been established that cancer patients with oligometastases, i.e., only a few detectable metastases confined to one or a few organs, may benefit from an aggressive local treatment approach such as the application of high-precision stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Specifically, some studies have indicated that achieving long-term local tumor control of oligometastases is associated with prolonged overall survival. This motivates investigations into which factors may modify the dose-response relationship of SBRT by making metastases more or less radioresistant. One such factor relates to the uptake of the positron emission tomography tracer 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) which reflects the extent of tumor cell glycolysis or the Warburg effect, respectively. Here we review the biological mechanisms how the Warburg effect drives tumor cell radioresistance and metastasis and draw connections to clinical studies reporting associations between high FDG uptake and worse clinical outcomes after SBRT for oligometastases. We further review the evidence for distinct metabolic phenotypes of metastases preferentially seeding to specific organs and their possible translation into distinct radioresistance. Finally, evidence that obesity and hyperglycemia also affect outcomes after SBRT will be presented. While delivered dose is the main determinant of a high local tumor control probability, there might be clinical scenarios when metabolic targeting could make the difference between achieving local control or not, for example when doses have to be compromised in order to spare neighboring high-risk organs, or when tumors are expected to be highly therapy-resistant due to heavy pretreatment such as chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer J Klement
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany.
| | - Reinhart A Sweeney
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tubin S, Vozenin M, Prezado Y, Durante M, Prise K, Lara P, Greco C, Massaccesi M, Guha C, Wu X, Mohiuddin M, Vestergaard A, Bassler N, Gupta S, Stock M, Timmerman R. Novel unconventional radiotherapy techniques: Current status and future perspectives - Report from the 2nd international radiation oncology online seminar. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 40:100605. [PMID: 36910025 PMCID: PMC9996385 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
•Improvement of therapeutic ratio by novel unconventional radiotherapy approaches.•Immunomodulation using high-dose spatially fractionated radiotherapy.•Boosting radiation anti-tumor effects by adding an immune-mediated cell killing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Tubin
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
- Corresponding author.
| | - M.C. Vozenin
- Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Radiation Oncology Service, Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Y. Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
| | - M. Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, Darmstadt 64291, Germany
- Technsiche Universität Darmstadt, Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - K.M. Prise
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - P.C. Lara
- Canarian Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Roque University Hospital & Fernando Pessoa Canarias University, C/Dolores de la Rocha 9, Las Palmas GC 35001, Spain
| | - C. Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasilia, Lisbon 1400-038, Portugal
| | - M. Massaccesi
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C. Guha
- Montefiore Medical Center Radiation Oncology, 111 E 210th St, New York, NY, United States
| | - X. Wu
- Executive Medical Physics Associates, 19470 NE 22nd Road, Miami, FL 33179, United States
| | - M.M. Mohiuddin
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, 4455 Weaver Pkwy, Warrenville, IL 60555, United States
| | - A. Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - N. Bassler
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S. Gupta
- The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - M. Stock
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
| | - R. Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Inwood Road Dallas, TX 2280, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nicosia L, Franceschini D, Perrone-Congedi F, Molinari A, Gerardi MA, Rigo M, Mazzola R, Perna M, Scotti V, Fodor A, Iurato A, Pasqualetti F, Gadducci G, Chiesa S, Niespolo RM, Bruni A, Cappelli A, D'Angelo E, Borghetti P, Di Marzo A, Ravasio A, De Bari B, Sepulcri M, Aiello D, Mortellaro G, Sangalli C, Franceschini M, Montesi G, Aquilanti FM, Lunardi G, Valdagni R, Fazio I, Scarzello G, Vavassori V, Maranzano E, Maria Magrini S, Arcangeli S, Gambacorta MA, Valentini V, Paiar F, Ramella S, Di Muzio NG, Loi M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Casamassima F, Osti MF, Scorsetti M, Alongi F. A predictive model of polymetastatic disease from a multicenter large retrospectIve database on colorectal lung metastases treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: The RED LaIT-SABR study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100568. [PMID: 36935855 PMCID: PMC10014322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) showed increasing survival in oligometastatic patients. Few studies actually depicted oligometastatic disease (OMD) evolution and which patient will remain disease-free and which will rapidly develop a polymetastatic disease (PMD) after SABR. Therefore, apart from the number of active metastases, there are no clues on which proven factor should be considered for prescribing local treatment in OMD. The study aims to identify predictive factors of polymetastatic evolution in lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients. Methods This international Ethical Committee approved trial (Prot. Negrar 2019-ZT) involved 23 Centers and 450 lung oligometastatic patients. Primary end-point was time to the polymetastatic conversion (tPMC). Additionally, oligometastases number and cumulative gross tumor volume (cumGTV) were used as combined predictive factors of tPMC. Oligometastases number was stratified as 1, 2-3, and 4-5; cumGTV was dichotomized to the value of 10 cc. Results The median tPMC in the overall population was 26 months. Population was classified in the following tPMC risk classes: low-risk (1-3 oligometastases and cumGTV ≤ 10 cc) with median tPMC of 35.1 months; intermediate-risk (1-3 oligometastases and cumGTV > 10 cc), with median tPMC of 13.9 months, and high-risk (4-5 oligometastases, any cumGTV) with median tPMC of 9.4 months (p = 0.000). Conclusion The present study identified predictive factors of polymetastatic evolution after SABR in lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer. The results demonstrated that the sole metastases number is not sufficient to define the OMD since patients defined oligometastatic from a numerical point of view might rapidly progress to PMD when the cumulative tumor volume is high. A tailored approach in SABR prescription should be pursued considering the expected disease evolution after SABR, with the aim to avoid unnecessary treatment and toxicity in those at high risk of polymetastatic spread, and maximize local treatment in those with a favorable disease evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Italy
- Corresponding author at: Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034 Verona, Negrar, Italy.
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Perrone-Congedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, “Sapienza” University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Italy
| | - Marco Perna
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Vieri Scotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrei Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Aurelia Iurato
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via A. del Portillo, 21, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pasqualetti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123 Pisa, Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Giovanni Gadducci
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123 Pisa, Italy
| | - Silvia Chiesa
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alessio Bruni
- Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Anna Cappelli
- Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Elisa D'Angelo
- Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia – Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Berardino De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Neuchâtel Hospital Network, la Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - Matteo Sepulcri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Dario Aiello
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Sangalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marzia Franceschini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Gianluigi Lunardi
- Clinical Analysis Laboratory and Transfusional Medicine, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ivan Fazio
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scarzello
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | | | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia – Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Milan Bicocca, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabiola Paiar
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123 Pisa, Italy
| | - Sara Ramella
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via A. del Portillo, 21, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Nadia Gisella Di Muzio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, “Sapienza” University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele – Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhao X, Wang B, Zhuang Y, Du S, Zeng Z. Single High-Dose Irradiation-Induced iRhom2 Upregulation Promotes Macrophage Antitumor Activity Through cGAS/STING Signaling. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00160-8. [PMID: 36792017 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The clinical application of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows a high dose of radiation to be safely delivered to extracranial targets within the body; however, a high dose per fraction (hypofractionation) has opened the radiation oncology field to new questions on a variety of dose-fractionation schedules, especially the immunomodulatory effects of radiation therapy, which can change after various dose-fractionation schedules. We investigated the immunomodulatory effects of different fractionation schedules. METHODS AND MATERIALS We established a subcutaneous tumor model in wild-type C57BL/6J mice and STING (stimulator of interferon genes)-deficient mice. We then compared the tumor control efficacy of 3 different fractionation schedules: 2 Gy × 8, 4.5 Gy × 3, and 10 Gy × 1, which are similar biologically effective doses. RESULTS We found the fractionation schedule of 10 Gy × 1 had a significantly higher antitumor effect, suggesting that a single high dose induced enhanced antitumor immunity compared with conventional fractionation (2 Gy × 8) and moderate hypofractionation (4.5 Gy × 3). However, in STING-deficient mice, differential tumor control was not observed among the 3 dose-fractionation schedules, suggesting that cGAS (cyclic GMP-AMP synthase)/STING signaling is involved in the antitumor immune effects of single high-dose schedules. Mechanistically, we found that conventional fractionation induced apoptosis; by comparison, a single high dose was more attuned to induced necroptosis, leading to the release of intracellular irradiation-induced double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) due to the loss of plasma membrane integrity, which then activated the dsDNA sensing signaling cGAS/STING in the recruited macrophage. Furthermore, iRhom2, a member of the conserved family of inhibitory rhomboid-like pseudoproteases, was upregulated in infiltrated macrophages in the single high-dose irradiation microenvironment. Therefore, iRhom2 positively regulates STING and directly promotes tumor necrosis factor α secretion. This exacerbates necroptosis of irradiated tumor cells, leading to continuous dsDNA release and enhancement of cGAS/STING signaling antitumor immunity in a positive feedback loop. CONCLUSIONS iRhom2 amplifies antitumor signaling in a positive feedback loop mediated by cGAS/STING signaling and tumor necrosis factor-driven necroptosis after single high-dose radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaomei Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Biao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan Zhuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shisuo Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Zhaochong Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Greco C, Pares O, Pimentel N, Louro V, Nunes B, Kociolek J, Marques J, Fuks Z. Health-related quality of life of salvage prostate reirradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with urethral-sparing. Front Oncol 2022; 12:984917. [PMID: 36276100 PMCID: PMC9582606 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.984917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore whether prostate motion mitigation using the rectal distension-mediated technique is safe and effective in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) salvage treatment of intraprostatic cancer recurrences following initial radiotherapy for primary prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between July 2013 and December 2020, 30 patients received salvage SABR for 68Ga- PSMA-11 PET/CT-detected intra-prostatic relapses. Median time from primary RT to salvage reirradiation was 70.2 (IQR, 51.3-116.0) months. Median PSA at retreatment was 3.6 ng/mL (IQR, 1.9-6.2). Rectal distension-mediated SABR was achieved with a 150-cm3 air-inflated endorectal balloon and a Foley catheter loaded with 3 beacon transponders was used for urethra visualization and on-line tracking. MRI-based planning employed a 2-mm expansion around the planned target volume (PTV), reduced to 0-mm at the interface with critical organs at risk (OARs). Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) permitted a 20% dose reduction of the urethra. VMAT simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of the dominant intraprostatic lesion was deployed when indicated. Median SABR dose was 35 Gy (7 Gy per fraction over 5 consecutive days; range 35-40 Gy). Toxicity assessment used CTCAE v.4 criteria. RESULTS Median follow-up was 44 months (IQR, 18-60). The actuarial 3- and 4-year biochemical relapse free survival was 53.4% and 47.5%, respectively. Intraprostatic post-salvage relapse by PSMA PET/CT was 53.3%. Acute grade 2 and 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicities were 20% and 0%, respectively. There were no instances of acute grade ≥2 rectal (GI) toxicity. Late grade 2 and 3 GU toxicities occurred in 13.3% and 0% of patients, respectively. There were no instances of grade ≥2 late rectal toxicity. Patient-reported QOL measures showed an acute transient deterioration in the urinary domain 1 month after treatment but returned to baseline values at 3 months. The median IPSS scores rose over baseline (≥5 points in 53% of patients) between month 6 and 12 post-treatment as a result of urinary symptoms flare, eventually receding at 18 months. The bowel domain metrics had no appreciable changes over time. CONCLUSION Pursuit of local control in intraprostatic failures is feasible and can be achieved with an acceptably low toxicity profile associated with effective OAR sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Greco
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal,*Correspondence: Carlo Greco,
| | - Oriol Pares
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nuno Pimentel
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vasco Louro
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Beatriz Nunes
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Justyna Kociolek
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joao Marques
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Zvi Fuks
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Department of Radiation Oncology Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kozin SV. Vascular damage in tumors: a key player in stereotactic radiation therapy? Trends Cancer 2022; 8:806-819. [PMID: 35835699 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The use of stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) for cancer treatment has grown in recent years, showing excellent results for some tumors. The greatly increased doses per fraction in SRT compared to conventional radiotherapy suggest a 'new biology' that determines treatment outcome. Proposed mechanisms include significant damage to tumor blood vessels and enhanced antitumor immune responses, which are also vasculature-dependent. These ideas are mostly based on the results of radiation studies in animal models because direct observations in humans are limited. However, even preclinical findings are somewhat incomplete and result in ambiguous conclusions. Current evidence of vasculature-related mechanisms of SRT is reviewed. Understanding them could result in better optimization of SRT alone or in combination with immune or other cancer therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey V Kozin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nicosia L, Figlia V, Ricottone N, Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Giaj-Levra N, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Jafari F, Maria Magrini S, Girlando A, Alongi F. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and concomitant systemic therapy in oligoprogressive breast cancer patients. Clin Exp Metastasis 2022; 39:581-588. [PMID: 35511313 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-022-10167-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease with a deep tailoring level. Evidence is accumulating on the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the management of oligometastatic disease, however this is limited in breast cancer. The aim of the present study is to show the effectiveness of SBRT in delaying the switch to a subsequent systemic treatment in oligoprogressive breast cancer patients. Retrospective analysis from two Institutions. Primary endpoint: time to next systemic treatment (NEST). Secondary endpoints: freedom from local progression (FLP), time to the polymetastatic conversion (tPMC) and overall survival (OS). One-hundred fifty-three (153) metastases in 79 oligoprogressive breast cancer patients were treated with SBRT. Median follow-up 24 months. Median NEST 8 months. Predictive factor of NEST at the multivariate analysis (MVA) was the number of treated oligometastases (HR 1.765, 95%CI 1.322-2.355; p = < 0.01). Systemic treatment after SBRT was changed in 29 patients for polymetastatic progression and in 10 patients for oligometastatic progression < 6 months after SBRT. The 2-year FLP in the overall population was 86.7%. A biological effective dose (BED) > 70Gy10 was associated with improved FLP (90% versus 74.2%). The median tPMC was 10 months. At the MVA the only factors significantly associated with tPMC were the number of oligometastases (HR 1.172, 95%CI 1.000-1.368; p = 0.03), and the local control of the treated metastases (HR 2.726, CI95% 1.108-6.706; p = 0.02). SBRT can delay the switch to a subsequent systemic treatment, however patient selection is necessary. Several predictive factors for treatment tailoring have been identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy.
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Nicola Ricottone
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy
| | - Fatemeh Jafari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea Girlando
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, Negrar, 37034, Verona, Italy.,University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Nicosia L, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Attinà G, Vitale C, Pastorello E, Ruggieri R, Alongi F. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases: a monoinstitutional analysis of clinical outcomes and potential prognostic factors. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:934-939. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01951-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
12
|
Ito K, Nakajima Y, Ikuta S. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal oligometastases: a review on patient selection and the optimal methodology. Jpn J Radiol 2022; 40:1017-1023. [PMID: 35396669 PMCID: PMC9529679 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01277-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has excellent local control and low toxicity for spinal metastases and is widely performed for spinal oligometastases. However, its additional survival benefit to standard of care, including systemic therapy, is unknown because the results of large-scale randomized controlled trials regarding SBRT for oligometastases have not been reported. Consequently, the optimal patient population among those with spinal oligometastases and the optimal methodology for spine SBRT remain unclear. The present review article discusses two topics: evidence-based optimal patient selection and methodology. The following have been reported to be good prognostic factors: young age, good performance status, slow-growing disease with a long disease-free interval, minimal disease burden, and mild fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in positron emission tomography. In addition, we proposed four measures as the optimal SBRT method for achieving excellent local control: (i) required target delineation; (ii) recommended dose fraction schedule (20 or 24 Gy in a single fraction for spinal oligometastases and 35 Gy in five fractions for lesions located near the spinal cord); (iii) optimizing dose distribution for the target; (iv) dose constraint options for the spinal cord.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Ito
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677 Japan
| | - Yujiro Nakajima
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677 Japan
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Komazawa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Syuzo Ikuta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Greco C, Pares O, Pimentel N, Louro V, Morales J, Nunes B, Antunes I, Vasconcelos AL, Kociolek J, Castanheira J, Oliveira C, Silva A, Vaz S, Oliveira F, Carrasquinha E, Costa D, Fuks Z. Positron Emission Tomography-Derived Metrics Predict the Probability of Local Relapse After Oligometastasis-Directed Ablative Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100864. [PMID: 35036636 PMCID: PMC8752878 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Early positron emission tomography–derived metrics post–oligometastasis radioablation may predict impending local relapses (LRs), providing a basis for a timely ablation. Methods and Materials Positron emission tomography data of 623 lesions treated with either 24 Gy single-dose radiation therapy (SDRT) (n = 475) or 3 × 9 Gy stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) (n = 148) were analyzed in a training data set (n = 246) to obtain optimal cutoffs for pretreatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and its 3-month posttreatment decline (ΔSUVmax) in predicting LR risk, validated in a data set unseen to testing (n = 377). Results At a median of 21.7 months, 91 lesions developed LRs: 39 of 475 (8.2%) after SDRT and 52 of 148 (35.1%) after SBRT. The optimal cutoff values were 12 for SUVmax and –75% for ΔSUVmax. Bivariate SUVmax/ΔSUVmax permutations rendered a 3-tiered LR risk stratification of dual-favorable (low risk), 1 adverse (intermediate risk) and dual-adverse (high risk). Actuarial 5-year local relapse-free survival rates were 93.9% versus 89.6% versus 57.1% (P < .0001) and 76.1% versus 48.3% versus 8.2% (P < .0001) for SDRT and SBRT, respectively. The SBRT area under the ROC curve was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.61-0.79) and the high-risk subgroup yielded a 76.5% true positive LR prediction rate. Conclusions The SBRT dual-adverse SUVmax/ΔSUVmax category LR prediction power provides a basis for prospective studies testing whether a timely ablation of impending LRs affects oligometastasis outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
- Corresponding author: Carlo Greco, MD
| | - Oriol Pares
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nuno Pimentel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vasco Louro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Javier Morales
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Beatriz Nunes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Inês Antunes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Luisa Vasconcelos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Justyna Kociolek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joana Castanheira
- Department of Nuclear Medicine-Radiopharmacology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carla Oliveira
- Department of Nuclear Medicine-Radiopharmacology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Angelo Silva
- Department of Nuclear Medicine-Radiopharmacology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sofia Vaz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine-Radiopharmacology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Francisco Oliveira
- Department of Nuclear Medicine-Radiopharmacology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Eunice Carrasquinha
- Computational Clinical Imaging Group, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Durval Costa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine-Radiopharmacology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Zvi Fuks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nicosia L, Franceschini D, Perrone-Congedi F, Casamassima F, Gerardi MA, Rigo M, Mazzola R, Perna M, Scotti V, Fodor A, Iurato A, Pasqualetti F, Gadducci G, Chiesa S, Niespolo RM, Bruni A, Alicino G, Frassinelli L, Borghetti P, Di Marzo A, Ravasio A, De Bari B, Sepulcri M, Aiello D, Mortellaro G, Sangalli C, Franceschini M, Montesi G, Aquilanti FM, Lunardi G, Valdagni R, Fazio I, Corti L, Vavassori V, Maranzano E, Magrini SM, Arcangeli S, Valentini V, Paiar F, Ramella S, Di Muzio NG, Livi L, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Osti MF, Scorsetti M, Alongi F. A multicenter LArge retrospectIve daTabase on the personalization of Stereotactic ABlative Radiotherapy use in lung metastases from colon-rectal cancer: the LaIT-SABR study. Radiother Oncol 2021; 166:92-99. [PMID: 34748855 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been shown to increase survival in oligometastatic disease, but local control of colorectal metastases remains poor. We aimed to identify potential predictive factors of SBRT response through a multicenter large retrospective database and to investigate the progression to the polymetastatic disease (PMD). MATERIAL AND METHODS the study involved 23 centers, and was approved by the Ethical Committee (Prot. Negrar 2019-ZT). 1033 lung metastases were reported. Clinical and biological parameters were evaluated as predictive for local progression-free survival (FLP). Secondary end-point was the time to the polymetastatic conversion (tPMC). RESULTS Two-year FLP was 75.4%. Two-year FLP for lesions treated with a BED <100 Gy, 100-124 Gy, and ≥125 Gy was 76.1%, 70.6%, and 94% (p=0.000). Two-year FLP for lesion measuring ≤10 mm, 10-20 mm, and >20 mm was 79.7%, 77.1%, and 66.6% (p=0.027). At the multivariate analysis a BED ≥125 Gy significantly reduced the risk of local progression (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.11-0.51; p=0.000). Median tPMC was 26.8 months. Lesions treated with BED ≥125 Gy reported a significantly longer tPMC as compared to lower BED. The median tPMC for patients treated to 1, 2-3 or 4-5 simultaneous oligometastases was 28.5, 25.4, and 9.8 months (p=0.035). CONCLUSION The present is the largest series of lung colorectal metastases treated with SABR. The results support the use of SBRT in lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients as it might delay the transition to PMD or offer relatively long disease-free period in selected cases. Predictive factors were identified for treatment personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center.
| | - D Franceschini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - F Perrone-Congedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "Sapienza" University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | | | - M A Gerardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center
| | - R Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center
| | - M Perna
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - V Scotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - A Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - A Iurato
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via A. del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - F Pasqualetti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Gadducci
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy
| | - S Chiesa
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - R M Niespolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - A Bruni
- Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - G Alicino
- Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - L Frassinelli
- Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - P Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia - Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Di Marzo
- Radiation Oncology Centre, S. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - A Ravasio
- Radiotherapy Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo
| | - B De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Neuchâtel Hospital Network, la Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - M Sepulcri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - D Aiello
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - G Mortellaro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Ospedale Civico, Palermo, Italy
| | - C Sangalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - M Franceschini
- Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - G Montesi
- Radiotherapy Unit ULSS5, Rovigo, Italy
| | - F M Aquilanti
- Radiotherapy Marrelli Hospital, Marrelli Hospital, Crotone, Italy
| | - G Lunardi
- Medical Analysis Laboratory, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital
| | - R Valdagni
- Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology-Oncology, University of Milan
| | - I Fazio
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - L Corti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - V Vavassori
- Radiotherapy Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo
| | - E Maranzano
- Radiation Oncology Centre, S. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - S M Magrini
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia - Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - S Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - V Valentini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - F Paiar
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy
| | - S Ramella
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via A. del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - N G Di Muzio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - L Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - M F Osti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "Sapienza" University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - F Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Greco C, Fuks Z. Single-Dose Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer-Lessons Learned From Single-Fraction High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy-Reply. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:1573. [PMID: 34351361 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Greco
- Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Zvi Fuks
- Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pirasteh A, Lovrec P, Pedrosa I. Imaging and its Impact on Defining the Oligometastatic State. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:186-199. [PMID: 34090645 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Successful treatment of oligometastatic disease (OMD) is facilitated through timely detection and localization of disease, both at the time of initial diagnosis (synchronous OMD) and following the initial therapy (metachronous OMD). Hence, imaging plays an indispensable role in management of patients with OMD. However, the challenges and complexities of OMD management are also reflected in the imaging of this entity. While innovations and advances in imaging technology have made a tremendous impact in disease detection and management, there remain substantial and unaddressed challenges for earlier and more accurate establishment of OMD state. This review will provide an overview of the available imaging modalities and their inherent strengths and weaknesses, with a focus on their role and potential in detection and evaluation of OMD in different organ systems. Furthermore, we will review the role of imaging in evaluation of OMD for malignancies of various primary organs, such as the lung, prostate, colon/rectum, breast, kidney, as well as neuroendocrine tumors and gynecologic malignancies. We aim to provide a practical overview about the utilization of imaging for clinicians who play a role in the care of those with, or at risk for OMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Pirasteh
- Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Petra Lovrec
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Departments of Radiology, Urology, and Advanced Imaging Research Center. University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mazzola R, Francolini G, Triggiani L, Napoli G, Cuccia F, Nicosia L, Livi L, Magrini SM, Salgarello M, Alongi F. Metastasis-directed Therapy (SBRT) Guided by PET-CT 18F-CHOLINE Versus PET-CT 68Ga-PSMA in Castration-sensitive Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:230-236. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
18
|
Hermann RM, Christiansen H, Bremer M. [Influence of fractionation (single dose 24Gy vs. 3 fractions of 9Gy) on oncological end points in SBRT of oligometastases]. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:661-663. [PMID: 33974099 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01786-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hans Christiansen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Spezielle Onkologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Michael Bremer
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Spezielle Onkologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Greco C, Pares O, Pimentel N, Louro V, Santiago I, Vieira S, Stroom J, Mateus D, Soares A, Marques J, Freitas E, Coelho G, Seixas M, Lopez-Beltran A, Fuks Z. Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Prostatectomy With Single-Dose Radiotherapy in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From the PROSINT Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:700-708. [PMID: 33704378 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Importance Ultra-high single-dose radiotherapy (SDRT) represents a potential alternative to curative extreme hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in organ-confined prostate cancer. Objective To compare toxic effect profiles, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, and quality-of-life end points of SDRT vs extreme hypofractionated SBRT. Design, Setting, and Participants The PROSINT single-institution phase 2 randomized clinical trial accrued, between September 2015 and January 2017, 30 participants with intermediate-risk prostate cancer to receive SDRT or extreme hypofractionated SBRT. Androgen deprivation therapy was not permitted. Data were analyzed from March to May 2020. Interventions Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 5 × 9 Gy SBRT (control arm) or 24 Gy SDRT (test arm). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was toxic effects; the secondary end points were PSA response, PSA relapse-free survival, and patient-reported quality of life measured with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 questionnaires. Results A total of 30 men were randomized; median (interquartile range) age was 66.3 (61.2-69.9) and 73.6 (64.7-75.9) years for the SBRT and SDRT arms, respectively. Time to appearance and duration of acute and late toxic effects were similar in the 2 trial arms. Cumulative late actuarial urinary toxic effects did not differ for grade 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 90% CI, 0.13-1.27) and grade 2 or greater (HR, 1.07; 90% CI, 0.21-5.57). Actuarial grade 1 late gastrointestinal (GI) toxic effects were comparable (HR, 0.37; 90% CI, 0.07-1.94) and there were no grade 2 or greater late GI toxic effects. Declines in PSA level to less than 0.5 ng/mL occurred by 36 months in both study arms. No PSA relapses occurred in favorable intermediate-risk disease, while in the unfavorable category, the actuarial 4-year PSA relapse-free survival values were 75.0% vs 64.0% (HR, 0.76; 90% CI, 0.17-3.31) for SBRT vs SDRT, respectively. The EPIC-26 median summary scores for the genitourinary and GI domains dropped transiently at 1 month and returned to pretreatment scores by 3 months in both arms. The IPSS-derived transient late urinary flare symptoms occurred at 9 to 18 months in 20% (90% CI, 3%-37%) of patients receiving SDRT. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial among patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, SDRT was safe and associated with low toxicity, and the tumor control and quality-of-life end points closely match the SBRT arm outcomes. Further studies are encouraged to explore indications for SDRT in the cure of prostate cancer. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02570919.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Greco
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Oriol Pares
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nuno Pimentel
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vasco Louro
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Inês Santiago
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sandra Vieira
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joep Stroom
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Dalila Mateus
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Soares
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - João Marques
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Elda Freitas
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Graça Coelho
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Manuela Seixas
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Zvi Fuks
- The Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ji X, Zhao Y, Zhu X, Shen Z, Li A, Chen C, Chu X. Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Oligometastases, Oligoprogression, or Local Control of Dominant Tumors. Front Oncol 2021; 10:595781. [PMID: 33585211 PMCID: PMC7878536 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.595781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the clinical outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with oligometastases, oligoprogression, or local control of dominant tumors after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and establish a nomogram model to predict the prognosis for these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS A cohort of 94 patients with 162 mCRC metastases was treated with SBRT at a single institution. Treatment indications were oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumors. End points of this study were the outcome in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local progression (LP), and cumulative incidence of starting or changing systemic therapy (SCST). In addition, univariate and multivariable analyses to assess variable associations were performed. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. RESULTS Median PFS were 12.6 months, 6.8 months, and 3.7 months for oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumors, respectively. 0-1 performance status, < 10 ug/L pre-SBRT CEA, and ≤ 2 metastases were significant predictors of higher PFS on multivariate analysis. Median OS were 40.0 months, 26.1 months, and 6.5 months for oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumors, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of the cohort, the independent factors for survival were indication, performance status, pre-SBRT CEA, and PTV, all of which were selected into the nomogram. The calibration curve for probability of survival showed the good agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting survival was 0.848. CONCLUSIONS SBRT for metastases derived from colorectal cancer offered favorable survival and symptom palliation without significant complications. The proposed nomogram could provide individual prediction of OS for patients with mCRC after SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoqin Ji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yulu Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xixu Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zetian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Aomei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Cheng Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoyuan Chu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Clinical School of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lee S, Yadav P, van der Kogel AJ, Bayouth J, Bassetti MF. In Silico Single-Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Thoracic and Abdominal Oligometastatic Disease With Online Adaptive Magnetic Resonance Guidance. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100652. [PMID: 34195490 PMCID: PMC8233469 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although SABR can improve oncologic outcomes for patients with oligometastatic disease, treatment of metastases near critical organs remains challenging. The purpose of this study is to determine the dosimetric feasibility of delivering magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided adaptive SABR in a single fraction for abdominal and thoracic metastases. Methods and Materials Previously delivered MRI-guided radiation therapy plans for 20 patients with oligometastatic disease in the thorax or abdomen, with 70% (14/20) of the lesions within 8 mm from dose-limiting organs at risk (OARs), were used to simulate the delivery of 24 Gy in a single fraction. Planning objectives included planning target volume (PTV) V95% >90%, optimized PTV (PTVopt) V95% >90%, and PTVopt D99% >20 Gy with no OAR dose violations, where PTVopt removed overlap with nearby planning organ at risk volume (PRV). Single-fraction plans were simulated on the first 5 daily setup breath-hold MRI scans, and the plans were reoptimized to consider variations in setup position and anatomy. Results The mean PTV V95% for single-fraction SABR plans was lower compared with multifraction plans (mean 85.4% vs 92.6%, P = .02), but mean PTVopt V95% was not different (95.3% vs 98.2%, P = .62). After reoptimization of the single-fraction plan to the treatment day MRI, there was an increase in mean PTV V95% (85.0% vs 88.1%, P = .05), increase in mean PTVopt V95% (92.7% vs 96.3%, P = .02), increase in mean PTVopt D99% (19.7 Gy vs 23.8 Gy, P < .01), increase in mean frequency of meeting PTV D99% >20 Gy (52% vs 87%, P < .01), and increase in mean gross tumor volume minimum dose (17.5 Gy vs 19.3 Gy, P < .01). Reoptimization decreased mean frequency of OAR dose constraint violation (48% vs 0%, P < .01). Conclusions Single-fraction MRI-guided SABR is a dosimetrically feasible treatment for oligometastases that allows for on-table adaptation to avoid OAR dose constraint violations, but this method requires clinical validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangjune Lee
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin.,Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Poonam Yadav
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Albert J van der Kogel
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - John Bayouth
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Michael F Bassetti
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zelefsky MJ, Yamada Y, Greco C, Lis E, Schöder H, Lobaugh S, Zhang Z, Braunstein S, Bilsky MH, Powell SN, Kolesnick R, Fuks Z. Phase 3 Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Single-Dose 24 Gy Radiation Therapy to a 3-Fraction SBRT Regimen in the Treatment of Oligometastatic Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:672-679. [PMID: 33422612 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This prospective phase 3 randomized trial was designed to test whether ultra high single-dose radiation therapy (24 Gy SDRT) improves local control of oligometastatic lesions compared to a standard hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy regimen (3 × 9 Gy SBRT). The secondary endpoint was to assess the associated toxicity and the impact of ablation on clinical patterns of metastatic progression. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between November 2010 and September 2015, 117 patients with 154 oligometastatic lesions (≤5/patient) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 24 Gy SDRT or 3 × 9 Gy SBRT. Local control within the irradiated field and the state of metastatic spread were assessed by periodic whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Median follow-up was 52 months. RESULTS A total of 59 patients with 77 lesions were randomized to 24 Gy SDRT and 58 patients with 77 lesions to 3 × 9 Gy SBRT. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence for SDRT-treated lesions was 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-6.5%) and 5.8% (95% CI, 0.2%-11.5%) at years 2 and 3, respectively, compared with 9.1% (95% CI, 2.6%-15.6%) and 22% (95% CI, 11.9%-32.1%) for SBRT-treated lesions (P = .0048). The 2- and 3-year cumulative incidences of distant metastatic progression in the SDRT patients were 5.3% (95% CI, 0%-11.1%), compared with 10.7% (95% CI, 2.5%-18.8%) and 22.5% (95% CI, 11.1%-33.9%), respectively, for the SBRT patients (P = .010). No differences in toxicity were observed. CONCLUSIONS The study confirms SDRT as a superior ablative treatment, indicating that effective ablation of oligometastatic lesions is associated with significant mitigation of distant metastatic progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Carlo Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Eric Lis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Stephanie Lobaugh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Mark H Bilsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Simon N Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard Kolesnick
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zvi Fuks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Zvi Fuks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Reply to: The course of lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer may be a reflection of selection for treatment rather than an effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:76-78. [PMID: 33242139 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01710-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
25
|
Yu JB, Brock KK, Campbell AM, Chen AB, Diaz R, Escorcia FE, Gupta G, Hrinivich WT, Joseph S, Korpics M, Onderdonk BE, Pandit-Taskar N, Wood BJ, Woodward WA. Proceedings of the ASTRO-RSNA Oligometastatic Disease Research Workshop. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:539-545. [PMID: 32434040 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE On June 13 to 14, 2019, the American Society for Radiation Oncology and the Radiological Society of North America convened a workshop on the treatment of oligometastatic disease in Washington, DC. The workshop was initiated for several reasons. First, oligometastatic disease is of increasing academic and community interest and has been identified by the American Society for Radiation Oncology membership as a top research priority. Second, emerging imaging and diagnostic technologies are more readily defining and detecting oligometastatic disease, making contemporary discussion of oligometastatic disease especially relevant. Third, radiosurgery and radiation in general are theorized to be ideal noninvasive therapy for the treatment of oligometastatic disease. Finally, innovations in targeted therapy and immune therapy have the potential to reverse widely disseminating disease into an oligometastatic state. METHODS AND MATERIALS The workshop was organized into 2 keynote addresses, 6 scientific sessions, and 3 group discussions during an end-of-workshop breakout session. New scientific work was presented in the form of 4 oral presentations and a poster session. Workshop participants were charged with attempting to answer 3 critical questions: (1) Can we refine the clinical and biological definitions of oligometastatic disease; (2) how can we better treat oligometastatic disease; and (3) what clinical trials are needed? RESULTS Here, we present the proceedings of the workshop. CONCLUSIONS The clinical implications of improved treatment of oligometastatic disease are enormous and immediate. Radiation oncology and diagnostic radiology should rightly be at the forefront of the characterization and treatment of oligometastatic disease. Focused effort is required so that we can translate current efforts of large numbers of studies with few patients to larger studies of larger impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James B Yu
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| | - Kristy K Brock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Allison M Campbell
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Aileen B Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Roberto Diaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Gaorav Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Medical School, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - William T Hrinivich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sabrina Joseph
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Mark Korpics
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Benjamin E Onderdonk
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Neeta Pandit-Taskar
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Wendy A Woodward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sogono P, Bressel M, David S, Shaw M, Chander S, Chu J, Plumridge N, Byrne K, Hardcastle N, Kron T, Wheeler G, Hanna GG, MacManus M, Ball D, Siva S. Safety, Efficacy, and Patterns of Failure After Single-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Oligometastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:756-763. [PMID: 33069796 PMCID: PMC7560377 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Fewer attendances for radiation therapy results in increased efficiency and less foot traffic within a radiation therapy department. We investigated outcomes after single-fraction (SF) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic disease. Methods and Materials Between February 2010 and June 2019, patients who received SF SBRT to 1 to 5 sites of oligometastatic disease were included in this retrospective study. The primary objective was to describe patterns of first failure after SBRT. Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), high-grade treatment-related toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3), and freedom from systemic therapy (FFST). Results In total, 371 patients with 494 extracranial oligometastases received SF SBRT ranging from 16 Gy to 28 Gy. The most common primary malignancies were prostate (n = 107), lung (n = 63), kidney (n = 52), gastrointestinal (n = 51), and breast cancers (n = 42). The median follow-up was 3.1 years. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS was 93%, 69%, and 55%, respectively; PFS was 48%, 19%, and 14%, respectively; and FFST was 70%, 43%, and 35%, respectively. Twelve patients (3%) developed grade 3 to 4 treatment-related toxicity, with no grade 5 toxicity. As the first site of failure, the cumulative incidence of local failure (irrespective of other failures) at 1, 3 and 5 years was 4%, 8%, and 8%, respectively; locoregional relapse at the primary was 10%, 18%, and 18%, respectively; and distant failure was 45%, 66%, and 70%, respectively. Conclusions SF SBRT is safe and effective, and a significant proportion of patients remain FFST for several years after therapy. This approach could be considered in resource-constrained or bundled-payment environments. Locoregional failure of the primary site is the second most common pattern of failure, suggesting a role for optimization of primary control during metastasis-directed therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Sogono
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mathias Bressel
- Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Steven David
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Shaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarat Chander
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Julie Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nikki Plumridge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Keelan Byrne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tomas Kron
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Greg Wheeler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael MacManus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Ball
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Reddy AV, Mills MN, Reshko LB, Martin Richardson K, Kersh CR. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Uterine Cancer: Clinical Outcomes and Toxicity. Cancer Invest 2020; 38:522-530. [PMID: 32870714 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2020.1817483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
We report on clinical outcomes in patients with oligometastatic uterine cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Twenty-seven patients with 61 lesions were treated with SBRT. Median follow-up was 16.9 months. Local control was achieved in 49/61 (80.3%) lesions. One-year local-progression-free survival and overall survival were 75.9% and 65.4%. Lesions with favorable response were smaller than lesions with unfavorable response (p = .007). Liver lesions were less likely to achieve favorable response (p = .0128). There were no grade 3 or 4 events. Treatment with SBRT can provide excellent local control in oligometastatic uterine cancer with minimal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhinav V Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew N Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Leonid B Reshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - K Martin Richardson
- Riverside and University of Virginia Radiosurgery Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA
| | - Charles R Kersh
- Riverside and University of Virginia Radiosurgery Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Conformal Avoidance of Normal Organs at Risk by Perfusion-Modulated Dose Sculpting in Tumor Single-Dose Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:288-297. [PMID: 32777335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although 24 Gy single-dose radiation therapy (SDRT) renders >90% 5-year local relapse-free survival in human solid tumor lesions, SDRT delivery is not feasible in ∼50% of oligometastatic lesions owing to interference by dose/volume constraints of a serial organ at risk (OAR). Conformal OAR avoidance is based on a hypothetical model positing that the recently described SDRT biology specifically permits volumetric subdivision of the SDRT dose, such that high-intensity vascular drivers of SDRT lethality, generated within a major tumor subvolume exposed to a high 24 Gy dose (high-dose planning target volume [PTVHD]), would equilibrate SDRT signaling intensity throughout the tumor interstitial space, rendering bystander radiosensitization of a minor subvolume (perfusion-modulated dose sculpting PTV [PTVPMDS]), dose-sculpted to meet a serial OAR dose/volume constraint. An engineered PTVPMDS may thus yield tumor ablation despite PMDS dose reduction and conformally avoiding OAR exposure to a toxic dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS Dose fall-off within the PTVPMDS penumbra of oligometastatic lesions was planned and delivered by intensity modulated inverse dose painting. SDRT- and SDRT-PMDS-treated lesions were followed with periodic positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging to assess local tumor control. RESULTS Cumulative baseline 5-year local relapse rates of oligometastases treated with 24 Gy SDRT alone (8% relapses, n = 292) were similar in moderate PTVPMDS dose-sculpted (23-18 Gy, n = 76, 11% relapses, P = .36) and extreme dose-sculpted (<18 Gy, n = 61, 14% relapses, P = .29) lesions, provided the major 24 Gy PTVHD constituted ≥60% of the total PTV. In contrast, 28% of local relapses occurred in 26 extreme dose-sculpted PTVPMDS lesions when PTVHD constituted <60% of the total PTV (P = .004), suggesting a threshold for the PTVPMDS bystander effect. CONCLUSION The study provides compelling clinical support for the bystander radiosensitization hypothesis, rendering local cure of tumor lesions despite a ≥25% PTVPMDS dose reduction of the 24 Gy PTVHD dose, adapted to conformally meet OAR dose/volume constraints. The SDRT-PMDS approach thus provides a therapeutic resolution to otherwise radioablation-intractable oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
|
29
|
Nicosia L, Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Ricchetti F, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Rigo M, Tomasini D, Pasinetti N, Corradini S, Ruggieri R, Alongi F. Disease course of lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:813-820. [PMID: 32399637 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01627-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been shown to increase survival rates in oligometastatic disease (OMD), but local control of colorectal metastases remains poor. We aimed to explore the natural course of oligometastatic colorectal cancer and to investigate how SBRT of lung metastases can delay the progression to polymetastatic disease (PMD). METHODS 107 lung oligometastases in 38 patients were treated with SBRT at a single institution. The median number of treated lesions was 2 (range 1-5). Time to PMD (ttPMD) was defined as the time from SBRT to the occurrence of >5 new metastases. Genetic biomarkers such as EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability were investigated as predictive factors for response rates. RESULTS Median follow-up was 28 months. At median follow-up, 7 patients were free from disease and 31 had progression: 18 patients had sequential oligometastatic disease (SOMD) and 13 polymetastatic progression. All SOMD cases received a second SBRT course. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (range 4-9 months); median ttPMD was 25.8 months (range 12-39 months) with 1‑ and 2‑year PFS rates of 62.5% and 53.4%, respectively. 1‑ and 2‑year local PFS (LPFS) rates were 91.5% and 80%, respectively. At univariate analysis, BRAF wildtype correlated with better LPFS (p = 0.003), SOMD after primary SBRT was associated with longer cancer-specific survival (p = 0.031). Median overall survival (OS) was 39.5 months (range 26-64 months) and 2‑year OS was 71.1%. CONCLUSION The present results support local ablative treatment of lung metastases using SBRT in oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients, as it can delay the transition to PMD. Patients who progressed as SOMD maintained a survival advantage compared to those who developed PMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Davide Tomasini
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale di Esine, ASL Valle Camonica-Sebino Esine, Esine, Italy
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ruggero Ruggieri
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.,University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nicosia L, Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Bonù M, Corradini S, Tolia M, Alongi F. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can delay polymetastatic conversion in patients affected by liver oligometastases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 146:2351-2358. [PMID: 32356176 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03223-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE SBRT demonstrated to increase survival in oligometastatic patients. Nevertheless, little is known regarding the natural history of oligometastatic disease (OMD) and how SBRT may impact the transition to the polymetastatic disease (PMD). METHODS 97 liver metastases in 61 oligometastatic patients were treated with SBRT. Twenty patients (33%) had synchronous oligometastases, 41 (67%) presented with metachronous oligometastases. Median number of treated metastases was 2 (range 1-5). RESULTS Median follow-up was 24 months. Median tPMC was 11 months (range 4-17 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 23 months (range 16-29 months). Cancer-specific survival predictive factors were having further OMD after SBRT (21 months versus 15 months; p = 0.00), and local control of treated metastases (27 months versus 18 months; p = 0.031). Median PFS was 7 months (range 4-12 months). Patients with 1 metastasis had longer median PFS as compared to those with 2-3 and 4-5 metastases (14.7 months versus 5.3 months versus 6.5 months; p = 0.041). At the last follow-up, 50/61 patients (82%) progressed, 16 of which (26.6%) again as oligometastatic and 34 (56%) as polymetastatic. CONCLUSION In the setting of oligometastatic disease, SBRT is able to delay the transition to the PMD. A proportion of patients relapse as oligometastatic and can be eventually evaluated for a further SBRT course. Interestingly, those patients retain a survival benefit as compared to those who had PMD. Further studies are needed to explore the role of SBRT in OMD and to identify treatment strategies able to maintain the oligometastatic state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Marco Bonù
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Tolia
- Department of Radiotherapy/Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larisa, Biopolis, 41500, Larisa, Greece
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.,University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Savage T, Pandey S, Guha C. Postablation Modulation after Single High-Dose Radiation Therapy Improves Tumor Control via Enhanced Immunomodulation. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 26:910-921. [PMID: 31757878 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy (RT) is frequently used for local control of solid tumors using equal dose per fraction. Recently, single high-dose radiation has been used for ablation of solid tumors. In this report, we provide a novel immunological basis for radiation dose fractionation consisting of a single high-dose radiotherapy, followed by postablation modulation (PAM) with four daily low-dose fractions (22 Gy + 0.5 Gy × 4) to reprogram the tumor microenvironment by diminishing immune suppression, enabling infiltration of effector cells and increasing efficacy of tumor control. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Palpable 3LL and 4T1 tumors in C57Bl/6 and Balb/c mice were irradiated with the Small-Animal Radiation Research Platform irradiator, and tumor growth and survival were monitored. Immunomodulation of tumor and immune cells in vitro and in vivo characterization of tumor-infiltrating immune effector cells were performed by FACS. For systemic application of PAM-RT, whole-lung irradiation was administered in 4T1-bearing Balb/c mice. RESULTS We report significant tumor growth delays and increased survival in 3LL tumor-bearing mice with PAM. Primary tumor PAM-RT increased infiltration of immune effector cells and decreased Treg in irradiated tumors and secondary lymphoid organs. In a model of murine metastatic breast cancer (4T1), we demonstrated that systemic PAM-RT to the whole lung, 12 days after primary tumor ablative radiotherapy, increased survival with suppression of pulmonary metastases. CONCLUSIONS We provide a novel immunologic basis for radiation dose fractionation consisting of a single high dose of radiotherapy followed by daily low-dose PAM-RT fractionation to improve the immunogenic potential of ablative radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talicia Savage
- Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Sanjay Pandey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Chandan Guha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Greco C, Vazirani AA, Pares O, Pimentel N, Louro V, Morales J, Nunes B, Vasconcelos AL, Antunes I, Kociolek J, Fuks Z. The evolving role of external beam radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer. Semin Oncol 2019; 46:246-253. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|