1
|
Suydam CR, Schlussel AT. Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:619-629. [PMID: 38677825 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
The management of oligometastatic colorectal cancer differs from the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, and it is essential that those who treat oligometastatic disease be familiar with the treatment options for these patients. Although definitive treatment is often surgical, there are situations where local therapies such as SBRT or ablative techniques may better serve the patient. Adjuvant therapy should be provided to all patients, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered as well. The role of immunotherapy is currently limited due to the lack of clinical trials in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille R Suydam
- Department of General Surgery, 300 East Hospital Road, Fort Eisenhower, GA 30905, USA.
| | - Andrew T Schlussel
- Department of Surgery, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, 950 15th Street, Augusta, GA 30901, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tham JLM, Ng SP, Khor R, Wada M, Gan H, Thai AA, Corry J, Bahig H, Mäkitie AA, Nuyts S, De Bree R, Strojan P, Ng WT, Eisbruch A, Chow JCH, Ferlito A. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Recurrent and Oligometastatic Head and Neck Tumours. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3020. [PMID: 38892731 PMCID: PMC11173254 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The treatment of head and neck cancers (HNCs) encompasses a complex paradigm involving a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment. Locoregional recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure, and few patients are suitable for salvage surgery. Reirradiation with conventional radiation techniques is challenging due to normal tissue tolerance limits and the risk of significant toxicities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a highly conformal modality that offers the potential for cure while limiting the dose to surrounding tissue. There is also growing research that shows that those with oligometastatic disease can benefit from curative intent local ablative therapies such as SBRT. This review will look at published evidence regarding the use of SBRT in locoregional recurrent and oligometastatic HNCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodie L. M. Tham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Richard Khor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Morikatsu Wada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Hui Gan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Alesha A. Thai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - June Corry
- GenesisCare, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne 3065, Australia
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - Antti A. Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Research Program in Systems Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Remco De Bree
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - James C. H. Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queens Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- International Head and Neck Scientific Group, 35100 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kedves A, Akay M, Akay Y, Kisiván K, Glavák C, Miovecz Á, Schiffer Á, Kisander Z, Lőrincz A, Szőke A, Sánta B, Freihat O, Sipos D, Kovács Á, Lakosi F. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging diffusion parameters using artificial intelligence in low-and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy: A pilot study. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:986-994. [PMID: 38678978 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To investigate the predictive value of the pre-treatment diffusion parameters of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) using artificial intelligence (AI) for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). METHODS Retrospective evaluation was performed for 30 patients using pre-treatment multi-parametric MR image datasets between 2017 and 2021. MR-based mean- and minimum apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCmean, ADCmin) were calculated for the intraprostatic dominant lesion. Therapeutic response was assessed using PSA levels. Predictive performance was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Statistics performed with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS No biochemical relapse was detected after a median follow-up of twenty-three months (range: 3-50), with a median PSA of 0.01 ng/ml (range: 0.006-2.8) at the last examination. Significant differences were observed between the pre-treatment ADCmean, ADCmin parameters, and the group averages of patients with low and high 1-year-PSA measurements (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). In prediction, the random forest (RF) model outperformed the decision tree (DT) and support vector machine (SVM) models by yielding area under the curves (AUC), with 0.722, 0.685, and 0.5, respectively. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that pre-treatment MR diffusion data may predict therapeutic response using the novel approach of machine learning in PCa patients treated with SABR. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Clinicians shall measure and implement the evaluation of the suggested parameters (ADCmin, ADCmean) to provide the most accurate therapy for the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kedves
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - M Akay
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Y Akay
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - K Kisiván
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - C Glavák
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Á Miovecz
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Á Schiffer
- Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Z Kisander
- Department of Electrical Networks, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - A Lőrincz
- Institute of Information and Electrical Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - A Szőke
- 3D Printing and Visualization Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - B Sánta
- Röntgenpraxis Dr. Thomas Trieb, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - O Freihat
- College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - D Sipos
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Institute of Diagnostics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Á Kovács
- Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Institute of Diagnostics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Department of Oncoradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - F Lakosi
- "Moritz Kaposi" Teaching Hospital, Dr. József Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center, Kaposvár, Hungary; Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Institute of Diagnostics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Borghetti P, Facheris G, Ciammella P, Galaverni M, Granello L, Scotti V, Franceschini D, Romei A, Giaj Levra N, Federico M, La Vecchia M, Merlotti A, Sepulcri M, Piperno G, Marvaso G, Simoni N, Alì E, Pontoriero A, Cappelli A, Dionisi V, Menis J, Martino A, Vagge S, Canova S, Montesi G, Cuccia F, Boldrini L, Franzese C, Grisanti S, Bruni A, Scorsetti M. Sterotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in a Multicentric Series of Oligometastatic SCLC: The SAMOS Cohort. Clin Lung Cancer 2024; 25:151-158. [PMID: 38052684 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
AIMS SCLC is the most aggressive lung cancer histology with a 5-year OS <10%. At the diagnosis, almost two-thirds of the SCLC an Extended Disease presentation. Two randomized studies (CASPIAN and ImPower133) demonstrated an OS improvement, when immunotherapy was prescribed as maintenance therapy after standard chemotherapy. To date, SABR has had a limited indication in managing metastatic SCLC, although recent reports proposed it as a valid treatment option in selected patients. We propose a retrospective multicentric analysis of patients treated with SABR for oligometastatic SCLC. METHOD Data of patients affected by oligometastatic-SCLC treated with SABR between 2017 and 2022 in 11 Italian centers were collected. Clinical and therapeutic variables together with OS and time to next treatment were analyzed. Univariate analysis with Kaplan-Meier curve were calculated, and log-rank test were applied. Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS Data from 93 patients and 132 metastatic lesions were analyzed. The median age was 64 years (36-86) and all but 1 had Performance Status 0 or 1. Fifty-two patients presented ED at diagnosis. The first line treatment was radiochemotherapy in 42%, CHT alone in 24% and CHT-IO in 28%, others treatment accounts for 4% and only 2% of patients underwent best supportive care. Of the 132 lesions treated with SBRT 55 were in brain, 27 in lung, 11 in liver, 10 in lymph nodes, 8 in bones and 20 in adrenal gland. Median OS was 14 months, 1 year-OS and 2 years OS were 53% and 27%, respectively. The median TtNT was 14 months for the entire population. Of all the analyzed variables only, the anatomical site of the metastases and their number showed statistical significance in the univariate analysist, confirmed in the subsequent multivariate. CONCLUSION SABR seems to play a role in delaying further systemic lines in oligometastatic disease and to extend the use of ongoing treatment in oligoprogressive state. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giorgio Facheris
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda-USL IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Marco Galaverni
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Granello
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Vieri Scotti
- Radiation Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Romei
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Manuela Federico
- U.O. Radioterapia Oncologica, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - Maria La Vecchia
- U.O. Radioterapia Oncologica, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - Anna Merlotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, S. Croce and Carle Teaching Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Matteo Sepulcri
- Radiotherapy, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Gaia Piperno
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO-European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO-European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Simoni
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Emanuele Alì
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda-USL IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Antonio Pontoriero
- Department of Biomedical, Radiation Oncology Unit, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Anna Cappelli
- Radiotherapy Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Valeria Dionisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Jessica Menis
- Medical Oncology Department, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonella Martino
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Vagge
- Radiotherapy Department, E.O. Galliera, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefania Canova
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Montesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | | | - Luca Boldrini
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Grisanti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Medical Oncology Unit, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessio Bruni
- Department of Oncology and Ematology, Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cruz-Lim EM, Mou B, Baker S, Arbour G, Stefanyk K, Jiang W, Liu M, Bergman A, Schellenberg D, Alexander A, Berrang T, Bang A, Chng N, Matthews Q, Carolan H, Hsu F, Miller S, Atrchian S, Chan E, Ho C, Mohamed I, Lin A, Huang V, Mestrovic A, Hyde D, Lund C, Pai H, Valev B, Lefresne S, Tyldesley S, Olson R. Prospective Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligometastases: Analysis of the Population-based SABR-5 Phase II Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:148-156. [PMID: 38087705 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.11.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate longitudinal patient-reported quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS The SABR-5 trial was a population-based single-arm phase II study of SABR to up to five sites of oligometastases, conducted in six regional cancer centres in British Columbia, Canada from 2016 to 2020. Prospective QoL was measured using treatment site-specific QoL questionnaires at pre-treatment baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30 and 36 months after treatment. Patients with bone metastases were assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Patients with liver, adrenal and abdominopelvic lymph node metastases were assessed with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Abdominal Discomfort (FACIT-AD). Patients with lung and intrathoracic lymph node metastases were assessed with the Prospective Outcomes and Support Initiative (POSI) lung questionnaire. The two one-sided test procedure was used to assess equivalence between the worst QoL score and the baseline score of individual patients. The mean QoL at all time points was used to determine the trajectory of QoL response after SABR. The proportion of patients with 'stable', 'improved' or 'worsened' QoL was determined for all time points based on standard minimal clinically important differences (MCID; BPI worst pain = 2, BPI functional interference score [FIS] = 0.5, FACIT-AD Trial Outcome Index [TOI] = 8, POSI = 3). RESULTS All enrolled patients with baseline QoL assessment and at least one follow-up assessment were analysed (n = 133). On equivalence testing, the patients' worst QoL scores were clinically different from baseline scores and met MCID (BPI worst pain mean difference: 1.8, 90% confidence interval 1.19 to 2.42]; BPI FIS mean difference: 1.68, 90% confidence interval 1.15 to 2.21; FACIT-AD TOI mean difference: -8.76, 90% confidence interval -11.29 to -6.24; POSI mean difference: -4.61, 90% confidence interval -6.09 to -3.14). However, the mean FIS transiently worsened at 9, 18 and 21 months but eventually returned to stable levels. The mean FACIT and POSI scores also worsened at 36 months, albeit with a limited number of responses (n = 4 and 8, respectively). Most patients reported stable QoL at all time points (range: BPI worst pain 71-82%, BPI FIS 45-78%, FACIT-AD TOI 50-100%, POSI 25-73%). Clinically significant stability, worsening and improvement were seen in 70%/13%/18% of patients at 3 months, 53%/28%/19% at 18 months and 63%/25%/13% at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS Transient decreases in QoL that met MCID were seen between patients' worst QoL scores and baseline scores. However, most patients experienced stable QoL relative to pre-treatment levels on long-term follow-up. Further studies are needed to characterise patients at greatest risk for decreased QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Cruz-Lim
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B Mou
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Baker
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - G Arbour
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - K Stefanyk
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - W Jiang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - M Liu
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Bergman
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - D Schellenberg
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Alexander
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - T Berrang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Bang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - N Chng
- BC Cancer - Prince George, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Q Matthews
- BC Cancer - Prince George, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - H Carolan
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - F Hsu
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Abbotsford, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Miller
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Prince George, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Atrchian
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - E Chan
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - C Ho
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - I Mohamed
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Lin
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - V Huang
- BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Mestrovic
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - D Hyde
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - C Lund
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - H Pai
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B Valev
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Lefresne
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Tyldesley
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - R Olson
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Prince George, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cruz-Lim EM, Mou B, Jiang W, Liu M, Bergman A, Schellenberg D, Alexander A, Berrang T, Bang A, Chng N, Matthews Q, Carolan H, Hsu F, Miller S, Atrchian S, Chan E, Ho C, Mohamed I, Lin A, Huang V, Mestrovic A, Hyde D, Lund C, Pai H, Valev B, Lefresne S, Tyldesley S, Olson R, Baker S. Predictors of Quality of Life Decline in Patients with Oligometastases treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy: Analysis of the Population-Based SABR-5 Phase II Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:141-147. [PMID: 38296662 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Most patients experience stable quality of life (QoL) after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) treatment for oligometastases. However, a subset of patients experience clinically relevant declines in QoL on post-treatment follow-up. This study aimed to identify risk factors for QoL decline. MATERIALS AND METHODS The SABR-5 trial was a population-based single-arm phase II study of SABR to up to five sites of oligometastases. Prospective QoL was measured using treatment site-specific tools at pre-treatment baseline and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30 and 36 months after treatment. The time to persistent QoL decline was calculated as the time from SABR to the first decline in QoL score meeting minimum clinically important difference with no improvement to baseline score on subsequent assessments. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out to determine factors associated with QoL decline. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-three patients were included with a median follow-up of 32 months (interquartile range 25-43). Thirty-five patients (26%) experienced a persistent decline in QoL. The median time until persistent QoL decline was not reached. The cumulative incidence of QoL decline at 2 and 3 years were 22% (95% confidence interval 14.0-29.6) and 40% (95% confidence interval 28.0-51.2), respectively. In multivariable analysis, disease progression (odds ratio 5.23, 95% confidence interval 1.59-17.47, P = 0.007) and adrenal metastases (odds ratio 9.70, 95% confidence interval 1.41-66.93, P = 0.021) were associated with a higher risk of QoL decline. Grade 3 or higher (odds ratio 3.88, 95% confidence interval 0.92-16.31, P = 0.064) and grade 2 or higher SABR-associated toxicity (odds ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 0.85-5.91, P = 0.10) were associated with an increased risk of QoL decline but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Disease progression and adrenal lesion site were associated with persistent QoL decline following SABR. The development of grade 3 or higher toxicities was also associated with an increased risk, albeit not statistically significant. Further studies are needed, focusing on the QoL impact of metastasis-directed therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Cruz-Lim
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B Mou
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - W Jiang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - M Liu
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Bergman
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - D Schellenberg
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Alexander
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - T Berrang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Bang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - N Chng
- BC Cancer - Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Q Matthews
- BC Cancer - Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - H Carolan
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - F Hsu
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Miller
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Atrchian
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - E Chan
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - C Ho
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - I Mohamed
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Lin
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - V Huang
- BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Mestrovic
- BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - D Hyde
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - C Lund
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - H Pai
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B Valev
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Lefresne
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Tyldesley
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - R Olson
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Baker
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Cancer - Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bultijnck R, Van Hemelrijck M, Fonteyne V, Livi L, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Hemmatazad H, Mayinger M, Peulen H, Verbeke L, Ramella S, Castro P, Tsoutsou P, Stellamans K, Shaukat A, Orazem M, Jeene P, Braam P, Verkooijen H, Simek IM, Alongi F, Clementel E, Fortpied C, Machingura A, Boakye Oppong F, Guckenberger M, Ost P. Health-related quality of life in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer following metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy: Real-world data from the E 2-RADIatE OligoCare cohort. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100715. [PMID: 38274388 PMCID: PMC10808936 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the impact of metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) using real-world data from the OligoCare cohort. Materials and methods OligoCare is a pragmatic, observational cohort designed to assess the impact of metastases-directed SBRT on patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD). We report an interim analyses of the secondary endpoint HRQoL, assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, within six months of metastases-directed SBRT for oligometastatic disease in men with PCa among the first 1600 registered patients. HRQoL data collection was optional within the OligoCare cohort. To compare HRQoL between baseline and first follow-up assessment, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. A multiple linear regression model was used to explore the HRQoL associations with predefined factors. Results Out of the 1600 registered patients, 658 were treated for oligometastatic PCa, of which 233 had baseline QoL data and 132 patients had both baseline and follow-up HRQoL data. At baseline, most patients had a WHO performance status of 0 or 1 (87 %), were de-novo oligometastatic (79 %), had one metastasis (90 %), and had a good overall global health status (mean 80.81, SD16.11, IQR 75-92). 51 % received hormonal therapy as concomitant systemic treatment. Patients with comorbidities as assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity index had a worse global health status at baseline (-4.88, 95 % CI:-9.35, -0.42). No clinically meaningful significant difference in global health status was observed at first assessment following SBRT (median 3.0 months) compared with baseline (mean difference 2.27, 95 % CI:-1.54, 6.08). Upon evaluating the proportions, meaningful clinically important differences (a 10-point or more difference) was observed in, 17 % and 11 % of the patients reporting deterioration and improvement of global health status, respectively. Conclusion Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy had no negative impact on global HRQoL within the first six months after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée Bultijnck
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences M Serio, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Dept. of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Hossein Hemmatazad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Heike Peulen
- Catharina Ziekenhuis, Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Luc Verbeke
- Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Radiation Oncology, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Sara Ramella
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Pablo Castro
- Health Research Institute Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
| | - Pelagia Tsoutsou
- Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève - HUG - site de Cluse-Roseraie, Genève, Switzerland
| | | | - Adnan Shaukat
- NHS Grampian - Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Miha Orazem
- Institute of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Paul Jeene
- Radiotherapiegroep, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Pètra Braam
- Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Inga-Malin Simek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Filippo Alongi
- IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital & University of Brescia, Radiation Oncology, Verona, Italy
| | - Enrico Clementel
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Catherine Fortpied
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Abigirl Machingura
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Felix Boakye Oppong
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Iridium Network, Radiation Oncology, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Deipolyi AR, Ward RC, Riaz A, Vogl TJ, Simmons RM, Pieper CC, Bryce Y. Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222:e2329454. [PMID: 37377360 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Minimally invasive locoregional therapies have a growing role in the multidisciplinary treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer. Factors contributing to the expanding role of ablation for primary breast cancer include earlier diagnosis, when tumors are small, and increased longevity of patients whose condition precludes surgery. Cryoablation has emerged as the leading ablative modality for primary breast cancer owing to its wide availability, the lack of need for sedation, and the ability to monitor the ablation zone. Emerging evidence suggests that in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer, use of locoregional therapies to eradicate all disease sites may confer a survival advantage. Evidence also suggests that transarterial therapies-including chemoembolization, chemoperfusion, and radioembolization-may be helpful to some patients with advanced liver metastases from breast cancer, such as those with hepatic oligoprogression or those who cannot tolerate systemic therapy. However, the optimal modalities for treatment of oligometastatic and advanced metastatic disease remain unknown. Finally, locoregional therapies may produce tumor antigens that in combination with immunotherapy drive anti-tumor immunity. Although key trials are ongoing, additional prospective studies are needed to establish the inclusion of interventional oncology in societal breast cancer guidelines to support further clinical adoption and improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy R Deipolyi
- Department of Surgery, Interventional Radiology, West Virginia University/Charleston Area Medical Center, 3200 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV 25304
| | - Robert C Ward
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Ahsun Riaz
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Thomas J Vogl
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Rache M Simmons
- Department of Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Claus C Pieper
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Yolanda Bryce
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rushbrook SM, Kendall TJ, Zen Y, Albazaz R, Manoharan P, Pereira SP, Sturgess R, Davidson BR, Malik HZ, Manas D, Heaton N, Prasad KR, Bridgewater J, Valle JW, Goody R, Hawkins M, Prentice W, Morement H, Walmsley M, Khan SA. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gut 2023; 73:16-46. [PMID: 37770126 PMCID: PMC10715509 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
These guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) were commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology liver section. The guideline writing committee included a multidisciplinary team of experts from various specialties involved in the management of CCA, as well as patient/public representatives from AMMF (the Cholangiocarcinoma Charity) and PSC Support. Quality of evidence is presented using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) format. The recommendations arising are to be used as guidance rather than as a strict protocol-based reference, as the management of patients with CCA is often complex and always requires individual patient-centred considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon M Rushbrook
- Department of Hepatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Timothy James Kendall
- Division of Pathology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- University of Edinburgh MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Yoh Zen
- Department of Pathology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Raneem Albazaz
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Richard Sturgess
- Digestive Diseases Unit, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, London, UK
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Derek Manas
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - K Raj Prasad
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - John Bridgewater
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Juan W Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Goody
- Department of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Maria Hawkins
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Wendy Prentice
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Shahid A Khan
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology Section, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zayed S, Louie AV, Breadner DA, Palma DA, Correa RJM. Radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a practical review of rationale, recent data, and research questions. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231183668. [PMID: 37435562 PMCID: PMC10331344 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231183668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The combined use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is an emerging treatment paradigm for oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent phase I and II trial data suggest that SABR to multiple metastases in addition to ICI use is safe and effective with promising progression-free survival and overall survival signals. There is great interest in capitalizing on combined immunomodulation from these two modalities for the treatment of oligometastatic NSCLC. Ongoing trials seek to validate the safety, efficacy, and preferred sequencing of SABR and ICI. This narrative review of the role of SABR when combined with ICI in oligometastatic NSCLC discusses the rationale for this bimodality treatment, summarizes recent clinical trial evidence, and proposes key principles of management based on the available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sondos Zayed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander V. Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Hospital Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel A. Breadner
- Department of Medical Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - David A. Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cruz-Lim EM, Cereno RE, Cañal JP, Vega G, Inocencio E, Mou B. Challenges to Improving Access to Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Radiosurgery in the Philippines: A Case Study for Lower-Middle Income Countries. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:430-438. [PMID: 37179092 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ella Mae Cruz-Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zamboanga City Medical Center, Zamboanga City, Philippines; Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Kelowna, Kelowna, Canada.
| | - Reno Eufemon Cereno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Kelowna, Kelowna, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Manila Doctors Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Johanna Patricia Cañal
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Gaudencio Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Medical City, Manila, Philippines
| | - Elrick Inocencio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Benjamin Mou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Kelowna, Kelowna, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Carconi C, Cerreti M, Roberto M, Arrivi G, D'Ambrosio G, De Felice F, Di Civita MA, Iafrate F, Lucatelli P, Magliocca FM, Picchetto A, Picone V, Catalano C, Cortesi E, Tombolini V, Mazzuca F, Tomao S. The Management of Oligometastatic Disease in Colorectal Cancer: Present Strategies and Future Perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 186:103990. [PMID: 37061075 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Oligometastatic disease has been described as an intermediate clinical state between localized cancer and systemically metastasized disease. Recent clinical studies have shown prolonged survival when aggressive locoregional approaches are added to systemic therapies in patients with oligometastases. The aim of this review is to outline the newest options to treat oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), also considering its molecular patterns. We present an overview of the available local treatment strategies, including surgical procedures, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), thermal ablation, as well as trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Moreover, since imaging methods provide crucial information for the early diagnosis and management of oligometastatic CRC, we discuss the role of modern radiologic techniques in selecting patients that are amenable to potentially curative locoregional treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catia Carconi
- Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Micaela Cerreti
- Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Roberto
- UOC Oncologia A, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
| | - Giulia Arrivi
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giancarlo D'Ambrosio
- Department of General Surgery, Surgical Specialties and Organ Transplantation, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Alberto Di Civita
- UOC Oncologia A, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Iafrate
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierleone Lucatelli
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Massimo Magliocca
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Picchetto
- Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Picone
- UOC Oncologia B, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Catalano
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- UOC Oncologia B, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Mazzuca
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
de Bree R, Hardillo JA, de Ridder M. Oligometastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:1-3. [PMID: 36380722 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2148658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jose A Hardillo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mischa de Ridder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tan VS, Palma DA. Top Ten Lessons Learned from Trials in Oligometastatic Cancers. Cancer Res Treat 2023; 55:5-14. [PMID: 36567069 PMCID: PMC9873316 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2022.1460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent evidence supports the role of aggressive local treatment in the oligometastatic setting. In this review, we discuss the top 10 lessons we have learned from trials in oligometastatic cancers. Major lessons learned pertain to definitions of oligometastatic disease, outcomes, toxicity, costs, and the combination of ablative therapies with systemic therapy, including immunotherapy. Barriers to accrual for trials and upcoming phase III trials are also reviewed. These lessons may help to inform clinical practice and may be the basis for future research in the oligometastatic space.
Collapse
|
15
|
Olson R, Jiang W, Liu M, Bergman A, Schellenberg D, Mou B, Alexander A, Carolan H, Hsu F, Miller S, Atrchian S, Chan E, Ho C, Mohamed I, Lin A, Berrang T, Bang A, Chng N, Matthews Q, Baker S, Huang V, Mestrovic A, Hyde D, Lund C, Pai H, Valev B, Lefresene S, Tyldesley S. Treatment With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Up to 5 Oligometastases in Patients With Cancer: Primary Toxic Effect Results of the Nonrandomized Phase 2 SABR-5 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1644-1650. [PMID: 36173619 PMCID: PMC9523552 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance After the publication of the landmark SABR-COMET trial, concerns arose regarding high-grade toxic effects of treatment with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases. Objective To document toxic effects of treatment with SABR in a large cohort from a population-based, provincial cancer program. Design, Setting, and Participants From November 2016 to July 2020, 381 patients across all 6 cancer centers in British Columbia were treated in this single-arm, phase 2 trial of treatment with SABR for patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. During this period, patients were only eligible to receive treatment with SABR in these settings in trials within British Columbia; therefore, this analysis is population based, with resultant minimal selection bias compared with previously published SABR series. Interventions Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to up to 5 metastases. Main Outcomes and Measures Rate of grade 2, 3, 4, and 5 toxic effects associated with SABR. Findings Among 381 participants (122 women [32%]), the mean (SD; range) age was 68 (11.1; 30-97) years, and the median (range) follow-up was 25 (1-54) months. The most common histological findings were prostate cancer (123 [32%]), colorectal cancer (63 [17%]), breast cancer (42 [11%]), and lung cancer (33 [9%]). The number of SABR-treated sites were 1 (263 [69%]), 2 (82 [22%]), and 3 or more (36 [10%]). The most common sites of SABR were lung (188 [34%]), nonspine bone (136 [25%]), spine (85 [16%]), lymph nodes (78 [14%]), liver (29 [5%]), and adrenal (15 [3%]). Rates of grade 2, 3, 4, and 5 toxic effects associated with SABR (based on the highest-grade toxic effect per patient) were 14.2%; (95% CI, 10.7%-17.7%), 4.2% (95% CI, 2.2%-6.2%), 0%, and 0.3% (95% CI, 0%-0.8%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade 2 or higher toxic effects associated with SABR at year 2 by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 8%, and for grade 3 or higher, 4%. Conclusions and Relevance This single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial found that the incidence of grade 3 or higher SABR toxic effects in this population-based study was less than 5%. Furthermore, the rates of grade 2 or higher toxic effects (18.6%) were lower than previously published for SABR-COMET (29%). These results suggest that SABR treatment for oligometastases has acceptable rates of toxic effects and potentially support further enrollment in randomized phase 3 clinical trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02933242.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Olson
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Will Jiang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mitchell Liu
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alanah Bergman
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Devin Schellenberg
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Benjamin Mou
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Abraham Alexander
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hannah Carolan
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fred Hsu
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stacy Miller
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Siavash Atrchian
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elisa Chan
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Clement Ho
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Islam Mohamed
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Angela Lin
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tanya Berrang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrew Bang
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nick Chng
- British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Quinn Matthews
- British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sarah Baker
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Vicky Huang
- British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ante Mestrovic
- British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Derek Hyde
- British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Chad Lund
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Howard Pai
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Boris Valev
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Shilo Lefresene
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Scott Tyldesley
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
The Impact of Disease Progression on Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients with Oligo-Metastatic Disease at 12-Months post Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:989-999. [PMID: 35907512 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a paucity of published health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in patients with oligo-metastatic disease (OMD) who receive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and no available data assessing the impact of disease progression post SBRT on HRQOL in this patient population. METHODS Patients with OMD who received SBRT in a phase II single-arm research ethics board approved study were included, HRQOL was a secondary outcome. This study hypothesized that there is a different pattern of change from baseline HRQOL in patients with OMD treated with SBRT that have disease progression by 12-months (progressors) compared to those that do not progress by 12-months (non-progressors) as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 107 patients were included in this analysis, 41 without progression and 66 with progression by 12-months; median time to progression was 7.7 (0.3-57) months. A statistically significant (SS) decline in the mean Global Health/Quality of Life (GHQOL) score (73 (SD 21.8) to 67.2 (SD 27.1), p=0.04) from baseline in the entire population at the 12-month follow-up was found. Mean GHQOL change score in non-progressors were: -0.8; progressors -8.8 (p=0.07). However, only progressors demonstrated a difference between baseline and 12-month mean GHQOL scores (71.2 vs 62.4, p=0.01) which was both statistically and clinically significant (-8.8) in the range of small minimal clinically important difference (MCID). There was a higher proportion of patients who experienced a MCID deterioration in progressors compared to non-progressors (37.4% vs 24.4%, p=0.14). CONCLUSION Patients who progress by 12-months do not have a statistical or clinically significant difference in mean GHQOL change score compared to non-progressors. However, there are signals to suggest that patients who progress by 12-months post SBRT experience a different pattern of change compared to non-progressors, which is worse compared to baseline.
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Health related quality of life outcomes following stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with oligo-metastatic disease: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:163-169. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
19
|
Lessons in stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastases. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2022; 53:S63-S65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2022.04.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
20
|
van Marlen P, Verbakel WFAR, Slotman BJ, Dahele M. Single-fraction 34Gy lung SBRT using proton transmission beams: FLASH-dose calculations and the influence of different dose-rate methods and dose/dose-rate thresholds. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100954. [PMID: 35634574 PMCID: PMC9130077 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Research suggests that in addition to the dose-rate, a dose threshold is also important for the reduction in normal tissue toxicity with similar tumor control after ultrahigh dose-rate radiation therapy (UHDR-RT). In this analysis we aimed to identify factors that might limit the ability to achieve this “FLASH”-effect in a scenario attractive for UHDR-RT (high fractional beam dose, small target, few organs-at-risk): single-fraction 34 Gy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. Methods and Materials Clinical volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans and transmission beam (TB) plans were compared for 6 small and 1 large lung lesion. The TB-plan dose-rate was calculated using 4 methods and the FLASH-percentage (percentage of dose delivered at dose-rates ≥40/100 Gy/s and ≥4/8 Gy) was determined for various variables: a minimum spot time (minST) of 0.5/2 ms, maximum nozzle current (maxN) of 200/40 0nA, and 2 gantry current (GC) techniques (energy-layer based, spot-based [SB]). Results Based on absolute doses 5-beam TB and VMAT-plans are similar, but TB-plans have higher rib, skin, and ipsilateral lung dose than IMPT. Dose-rate calculation methods not considering scanning achieve FLASH-percentages between ∼30% to 80%, while methods considering scanning often achieve <30%. FLASH-percentages increase for lower minST/higher maxN and when using SB GC instead of energy-layer based GC, often approaching the percentage of dose exceeding the dose-threshold. For the small lesions average beam irradiation times (including scanning) varied between 0.06 to 0.31 seconds and total irradiation times between 0.28 to 1.57 seconds, for the large lesion beam times were between 0.16 to 1.47 seconds with total irradiation times of 1.09 to 5.89 seconds. Conclusions In a theoretically advantageous scenario for FLASH we found that TB-plan dosimetry was similar to that of VMAT, but inferior to that of IMPT, and that decreasing minST or using SB GC increase the estimated amount of FLASH. For the appropriate machine/delivery parameters high enough dose-rates can be achieved regardless of calculation method, meaning that a possible FLASH dose-threshold will likely be the primary limiting factor.
Collapse
|
21
|
Diplas BH, Santos PMG, Shahrokni A, Warner A, Iyengar P, Yang JT, Gomez DR, Palma DA, Tsai CJ. The Role of Ablative Radiotherapy in Older Adults With Limited Metastatic Disease. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:135-141. [PMID: 35307115 PMCID: PMC10898514 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
For patients with oligometastatic cancer, radiotherapy presents a promising avenue for achieving meaningful symptom relief and durable disease control. Data from recently published and ongoing randomized studies are helping to define the appropriate contexts for effective intervention with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in the oligometastatic setting. Importantly, older adults represent a significant portion of patients with oligometastatic disease, yet often comprise a minority of patients in clinical trials. Moreover, older adults of the same chronologic age may have variable degrees of fitness and frailty. In this review, we highlight the specific challenges and considerations for the use of radiotherapy for older adults with oligometastatic disease-noting the importance of geriatric assessments in clinical decision-making about the appropriateness of SABR and other metastasis-directed therapies in this population. We then review data from existing trials, including a subset analysis of adverse events and survival estimates among older adults enrolled in the landmark SABR-COMET trial. Finally, we discuss future directions for research, including the need for focused clinical trials in older adult cohorts. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary approach is critical when carefully balancing the potential risks and benefits of this emerging treatment paradigm in the older adult population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bill H Diplas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Patricia Mae G Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Department of Medicine, Geriatrics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew Warner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Puneeth Iyengar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David A Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - C Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Oligometastatic breast cancer, typically defined as the presence of 1-5 metastases, represents an intermediate state between locally advanced and widely metastatic disease. Emerging research suggests that oligometastatic cancer has a unique molecular signature distinct from widely metastatic disease, and that it carries a superior prognosis. Owing to its more limited capacity for widespread progression, oligometastatic disease may benefit from aggressive ablative therapy to known metastases. Options for ablation include surgical excision, radiofrequency ablation, and hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (HIGRT). The phase II SABR-COMET trial, which enrolled patients with oligometastatic disease of multiple histologies and randomized them to HIGRT vs. standard of care, found a notable survival advantage in favor of HIGRT. Other data suggest that HIGRT may synergize with immunotherapy by releasing powerful cytokines that increase anti-tumor immune surveillance and by recruiting tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, helping to overcome resistance to therapy. There are many ongoing trials exploring the role of ablative therapy, most notably HIGRT, with or without immunotherapy, for the treatment of oligometastatic breast cancer.We believe that patients with oligometastatic breast cancer should be offered enrollment on prospective clinical trials when possible. Outside the context of a clinical trial, we recommend that select patients with oligometastatic breast cancer be offered treatment with a curative approach, including ablative therapy to all sites of disease if it can be safely accomplished. Currently, selection criteria to consider for ablative therapy include longer disease-free interval from diagnosis to metastasis (>2 years), fewer metastases, and fewer involved organs. Undoubtedly, new data will refine or even upend our understanding of the definition and optimal management of oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
|
23
|
Radiation in the Treatment of Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Disease: Rationale, Recent Data, and Research Questions. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:156-165. [PMID: 32205541 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The use of local ablative therapy or metastasis-directed therapy is an emerging management paradigm in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive cancer. Recent randomized evidence has demonstrated that stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) targeting all metastatic deposits is tolerable and can improve progression-free and overall survival. While SABR is noninvasive, minimally toxic, and generally safe, rare grade 5 events have been reported. Given this and recognizing the often-uncertain prognosis of patients with metastatic disease, equipoise persists regarding the therapeutic window within which to deploy SABR for this indication. Ongoing phase III trials are aimed at validating the demonstrated safety, tolerability, and survival benefits while also refining patient selection, possibly with the aid of novel biomarkers. This narrative review of the role of SABR in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease summarizes recent randomized evidence and ongoing clinical trials, discusses our rationale for treatment and key management principles, and posits that SABR should be considered the preferred modality for multisite, metastasis-directed ablative therapy.
Collapse
|
24
|
Gomez DR, Yang TJ, Tsai CJ. Emerging Paradigm of Consolidative Thoracic Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic NSCLC. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:120-123. [PMID: 33610268 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The concept of oligometastatic disease has evolved substantially over the past decade. During this time, there has been a transition from retrospective and single-arm prospective studies to randomized evidence suggesting a benefit of local consolidative therapy (LCT) in the setting of limited metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. These trials had constraints and were thus limited in the strength of their conclusions, but led to several other ongoing randomized trials examining the role of LCT. These studies span various disease states (synchronous oligometastatic vs oligoprogressive), the scope of histologies included, and in how they define oligometastases. In addition, parallel biologic work is attempting to integrate relevant biomarkers and molecular classifications, with the ultimate goal of more precisely defining oligometastases and triaging patients to appropriate care. Finally, consensus guidelines have been initiated that provide a framework for designing future studies and for maintaining consistency across analyses that will facilitate the interpretation of results. This review describes the prior randomized data, the limitations therein, and future directions of clinical and preclinical studies that highlight the emerging paradigms for treatment of this select patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - T Jonathan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - C Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kamran SC, Zietman AL. Curing Metastatic Disease With Ablative Radiation Therapy: Separating Truth From Wish. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 107:433-436. [PMID: 32531389 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia C Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Anthony L Zietman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Vaugier L, Mirabel X, Martel-Lafay I, Racadot S, Carrie C, Vendrely V, Mahé MA, Senellart H, Raoul JL, Campion L, Rio E. Radiosensitizing Chemotherapy (Irinotecan) with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Inoperable Liver and/or Lung Metastases of Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13020248. [PMID: 33440832 PMCID: PMC7827408 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a recognized treatment for liver or lung metastases, but radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer could be lower than other primary cancers. We postulated that local responses could be improved by SBRT with a concomitant radiosensitizing agent (irinotecan). RADIOSTEREO-CAMPTO was a prospective multi-center phase 2 trial conducted between 2008 and 2013. We confirmed that SBRT-Irinotecan was a short, effective and well-tolerated treatment, with no worsening of the quality of life. It allowed for several months of chemotherapy-free periods despite most patients receiving multiple prior lines of treatment. Radiosensitizing irinotecan was able to compensate for lower SBRT dose than nowadays used for liver and lung metastases and could be an interesting regimen in case of tumour-surrounding healthy tissues requiring limited radiation dose. Abstract Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a recognized treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. We postulated that local responses could be improved by SBRT with a concomitant radiosensitizing agent (irinotecan). Methods: RADIOSTEREO-CAMPTO was a prospective multi-center phase 2 trial investigating SBRT (40–48 Gy in 4 fractions) for liver and/or lung inoperable CRC oligometastases (≤3), combined with two weekly intravenous infusions of 40 mg/m2 Irinotecan. Primary outcome was the objective local response rate as per RECIST. Secondary outcomes were early and late toxicities, EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life, local control and overall survival. Results: Forty-four patients with 51 lesions (liver = 39, lungs = 12) were included. Median age was 69 years (46–84); 37 patients (84%) had received at least two prior chemotherapy treatments. Median follow-up was 48.9 months. One patient with two lung lesions was lost during follow-up. Assuming maximum bias hypothesis, the objective local response rate in ITT was 86.3% (44/51—95% CI: [76.8–95.7]) or 82.4% (42/51—95% CI: [71.9–92.8]). The observed local response rate was 85.7% (42/49—95% CI: [75.9–95.5]). The 1 and 2-year local (distant) progression-free survivals were 84.2% (38.4%) and 67.4% (21.3%), respectively. The 1 and 2-year overall survivals were 97.5% and 75.5%. There were no severe acute or late reactions. The EORTC questionnaire scores did not significantly worsen during or after treatment. Conclusions: SBRT with irinotecan was well tolerated with promising results despite heavily pretreated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïg Vaugier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France; (L.V.); (M.-A.M.)
| | - Xavier Mirabel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France;
| | - Isabelle Martel-Lafay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (I.M.-L.); (S.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Séverine Racadot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (I.M.-L.); (S.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Christian Carrie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (I.M.-L.); (S.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Véronique Vendrely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Hôpital Saint André, 33000 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Marc-André Mahé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France; (L.V.); (M.-A.M.)
| | - Hélène Senellart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France; (H.S.); (J.-L.R.)
| | - Jean-Luc Raoul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France; (H.S.); (J.-L.R.)
| | - Loïc Campion
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France;
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie Nantes-Angers (CRCNA), UMR 1232 Inserm—6299 CNRS, Institut de Recherche en Santé de l’Université de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France
| | - Emmanuel Rio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 St-Herblain, France; (L.V.); (M.-A.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-240-679-900
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Is SABR Cost-Effective in Oligometastatic Cancer? An Economic Analysis of the SABR-COMET Randomized Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1176-1184. [PMID: 33309977 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The phase 2 randomized study SABR-COMET demonstrated that in patients with controlled primary tumors and 1 to 5 oligometastatic lesions, SABR was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with standard of care (SoC), but with higher costs and treatment-related toxicities. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of SABR versus SoC in this setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS A Markov model was constructed to perform a cost-utility analysis from the Canadian health care system perspective. Utility values and transition probabilities were derived from individual-level data from the SABR-COMET trial. One-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Costs were expressed in 2018 CAD. A separate analysis based on US payer's perspective was performed. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was used. RESULTS In the base case scenario, SABR was cost-effective at an ICER of $37,157 per QALY gained. This finding was most sensitive to the number of metastatic lesions treated with SABR (ICER: $28,066 per QALY for 2, increasing to $64,429 per QALY for 5), difference in chemotherapy use (ICER: $27,173-$53,738 per QALY), and PFS hazard ratio (HR) between strategies (ICER: $31,548-$53,273 per QALY). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that SABR was cost-effective in 97% of all iterations. Two-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated a nonlinear relationship between the number of lesions and the PFS HR. To maintain cost-effectiveness for each additional metastasis, the HR must decrease by approximately 0.047. The US cost analysis yielded similar results, with an ICER of $54,564 (2018 USD per QALY) for SABR. CONCLUSIONS SABR is cost-effective for patients with 1 to 5 oligometastatic lesions compared with SoC.
Collapse
|
28
|
Bosacki C, Bouleftour W, Sotton S, Vallard A, Daguenet E, Ouaz H, Cojoracu I, Moslemi D, Molekzadehmoghani M, Magné N. CDK 4/6 inhibitors combined with radiotherapy: A review of literature. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 26:79-85. [PMID: 33319074 PMCID: PMC7724290 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
CDK 4/6 inhibitors - palbociclib, ribociclib and abomaciclib - were approved by EMA. They are currently prescribed in combination with hormone therapy to treat hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer. Most pre-clinical studies refer to the synergistic effect of CDK4/6i-radiotherapy combination. The issue of their safe combined use with palliative or curative radiotherapy has only been explored through limited retrospective data.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) namely palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib were granted approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) between 2017 and 2018. They are currently prescribed in combination with hormone therapy to treat hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer. Their combination with radiotherapy raises safety concerns as preclinical data enlightened their possible synergistic effect. Moreover, data about toxicity when combining CDK4/6i with radiotherapy are scarce. This review of literature focused on the use of CDK4/6i combined with radiotherapy. It aimed at listing every published data about such combination so as to understand its possible resulting toxicity in metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Bosacki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, BP60008, 42271 Saint Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Wafa Bouleftour
- University Department of Teaching and Research, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, BP60008, 42271 Saint Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Sandrine Sotton
- University Department of Teaching and Research, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, BP60008, 42271 Saint Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Alexis Vallard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, BP60008, 42271 Saint Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Elisabeth Daguenet
- University Department of Teaching and Research, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, BP60008, 42271 Saint Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Hamza Ouaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, BP60008, 42271 Saint Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Iohel Cojoracu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, BP60008, 42271 Saint Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Dariush Moslemi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, BP60008, 42271 Saint Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Mona Molekzadehmoghani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, BP60008, 42271 Saint Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Nicolas Magné
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, BP60008, 42271 Saint Priest en Jarez cedex, France.,University Department of Teaching and Research, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, BP60008, 42271 Saint Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chen H, Louie A, Higginson D, Palma D, Colaco R, Sahgal A. Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Management of Oligometastatic Disease. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:713-727. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
30
|
Ricke J, Westphalen CB, Seidensticker M. Therapeutic Concepts for Oligometastatic Gastrointestinal Tumours. Visc Med 2020; 36:359-363. [PMID: 33178732 DOI: 10.1159/000509897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical trials have proven a survival benefit from applying local therapies for oligometastatic cancers of various origin. Summary Today, the definition of oligometa-static disease is based on limited lesion numbers and organ systems involved. Treatment guidelines by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and several other groups suggest a threshold of up to 5 tumours. Established biological markers indicating the aggressiveness of a given tumour (and therefore suggesting local treatment only or the addition of or complete switch to systemic therapies) are missing, except for disease-free survival, the only recommended parameter for patient selection beyond lesion count. Key Message The following article discusses clinical implications as well as local techniques established for the treatment of oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Ricke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Benedikt Westphalen
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III und CCC München, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Golden EB, Marciscano AE, Formenti SC. Radiation Therapy and the In Situ Vaccination Approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:891-898. [PMID: 32800803 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
During the past century, from the advent of preclinical modeling to the establishment of clinical trials, the hypothesis that host defenses regulate tumor growth (posited and refined by leaders in the field of cancer immunity) has become accepted as a scientific pillar in oncology. Since the turn of the millennium, a search has been under way for the best therapeutic approach to reprogram the immune system to recognize tumor cells that have undergone "immune escape." This quest has led some to question conventional scientific views of tumor cell kill, including the role of host immunity in patients treated with radiation therapy. In the last two decades, evidence has accumulated that radiation therapy can effectively convert a potentially lethal cancer into an in situ personalized vaccine. Herein, we review the underlying mechanisms and maneuvers responsible for in situ vaccine production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Encouse B Golden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York
| | - Ariel E Marciscano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York
| | - Silvia C Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wada Y, Hashimoto M. Modern evidence and future prospects of external body radiation therapy for lung oligometastases of breast cancer. Transl Cancer Res 2020; 9:5077-5086. [PMID: 35117873 PMCID: PMC8799217 DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2020.02.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
After Hellman and Weichselbaum defined "Oligometastasis" in 1995, several local therapies for lung oligometastases including surgical resection and external body radiation therapy were reported that improved local control (LC) and progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life. This suggests that oligometastases is a potentially curable state. Modern advances in radiation therapy such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in which high dose coverage of target lesion without exposure of normal organ is possible, and are widely used to treat solitary or a limited number of primary lung cancer and metastases. Several reports showed that SBRT was a useful treatment method for lung oligometastases, and the LC rate of SBRT was 80-90% in 2 years and less invasive than surgical resection. SBRT is a safe and effective especially for small and peripheral lung metastases. However, if the metastatic lesion is big or centrally located, careful treatment is necessary to prevent radiation pneumonitis. After SBRT, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate local recurrence and pulmonary injury, especially in the early phase. However, it is important to detect local recurrence especially in patients who require further local therapy such as surgical resection and re-irradiation or systemic therapy. The diagnosis can be improved by determining the natural course after SBRT and local recurrence with computed tomography imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, respectively. Moreover, radiation therapy may have both local and systemic effects that are related to the enhancement of immune-response after radiation. Currently, several trials evaluating the benefits of SBRT for oligometastatic breast cancer are underway. However, the adaption of SBRT for lung metastases including other treatment strategies should be carefully discussed by the radiation oncologist and a multi-disciplinary team comprising a breast surgeon, medical oncologist, diagnostic radiologist, and radiation oncologist, among others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Wada
- Department of Radiology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, Akita 010-8543, Japan
| | - Manabu Hashimoto
- Department of Radiology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, Akita 010-8543, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Janssen E, Subtil B, de la Jara Ortiz F, Verheul HMW, Tauriello DVF. Combinatorial Immunotherapies for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12071875. [PMID: 32664619 PMCID: PMC7408881 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent and deadly forms of cancer. About half of patients are affected by metastasis, with the cancer spreading to e.g., liver, lungs or the peritoneum. The majority of these patients cannot be cured despite steady advances in treatment options. Immunotherapies are currently not widely applicable for this disease, yet show potential in preclinical models and clinical translation. The tumour microenvironment (TME) has emerged as a key factor in CRC metastasis, including by means of immune evasion-forming a major barrier to effective immuno-oncology. Several approaches are in development that aim to overcome the immunosuppressive environment and boost anti-tumour immunity. Among them are vaccination strategies, cellular transplantation therapies, and targeted treatments. Given the complexity of the system, we argue for rational design of combinatorial therapies and consider the implications of precision medicine in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline Janssen
- Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (E.J.); (B.S.); (F.d.l.J.O.)
| | - Beatriz Subtil
- Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (E.J.); (B.S.); (F.d.l.J.O.)
| | - Fàtima de la Jara Ortiz
- Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (E.J.); (B.S.); (F.d.l.J.O.)
| | - Henk M. W. Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HBNijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Daniele V. F. Tauriello
- Department of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (E.J.); (B.S.); (F.d.l.J.O.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chan M, Palma D, Barry A, Hope A, Moore R, O’Neil M, Papadakos J, Schellenberg D, Tadic T, Tsai CJ, Giuliani M. Practical Considerations for the Implementation of a Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Program for Oligo-Metastases. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 6:100499. [PMID: 33490721 PMCID: PMC7811116 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose With multiple phase 2 trials supporting the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in oligo-metastatic disease, we evaluated practices that could inform effective implementation of an oligo-metastasis SBRT program. Methods and Materials Using a context-focused realist methodology, an advisory committee of interprofessional clinicians met over a series of semistructured teleconference meetings to identify challenges in implementing an oligo-metastasis SBRT program. Consideration was given to 2 models of care: a subspecialist anatomic expertise model versus a single-practitioner “quarterback” model. Results The advisory committee structured recommendations within a context-mechanism-outcome framework. In summary, the committee recommends that during patient workup, a single practitioner arranges the minimum number of necessary tests, with case presentation at an appropriate multidisciplinary tumor board, including careful review of all previous treatments, and enrollment on clinical trials when possible. At simulation, common patient positions and immobilization on a single simulation scan for multiple sites is recommended. During radiation planning, dose-fractionation regimens should safely facilitate cumulative dose calculations, a single isocenter should be considered for multiple close targets to reduce treatment time, and adherence to strict quality assurance protocols is strongly recommended. Treatment duration should be minimized by treating multiple sites on the same day or choosing shorter dose fractionations. Team communication, thorough documentation, and standardized nomenclature can reduce system errors. Follow-up should aim to minimize redundant clinical appointments and imaging scans. Expert radiology review may be required to interpret post-SBRT imaging. Conclusions These guidelines inform best clinical practices for implementing an oligo-metastasis SBRT program. Iterations using a realist approach may further expand on local contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Chan
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Palma
- Divison of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aisling Barry
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Hope
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard Moore
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melissa O’Neil
- Department of Radiation Therapy, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janet Papadakos
- Department of Cancer Education, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Devin Schellenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer – Surrey Centre, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tony Tadic
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - C. Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - Meredith Giuliani
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Corresponding author: Meredith Giuliani MBBS, MEd, FRCPC
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cost-Effectiveness of Metastasis-Directed Therapy in Oligorecurrent Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:917-926. [PMID: 32544574 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oligorecurrent prostate cancer has historically been treated with indefinite androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), although many patients and providers opt to defer this treatment at the time of recurrence given quality-of-life and/or comorbidity considerations. Recently, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has emerged as a potential intermediary between surveillance and immediate continuous ADT. Simultaneously, advanced systemic therapy in addition to ADT has also been shown to improve survival in metastatic hormone-sensitive disease. This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of treating oligorecurrent patients with upfront MDT before standard-of-care systemic therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS A Markov-based cost-effectiveness analysis was constructed comparing 3 strategies: (1) upfront MDT → salvage abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) + ADT → salvage docetaxel + ADT; (2) upfront AAP + ADT → salvage docetaxel + ADT; and (3) upfront docetaxel + ADT → salvage AAP + ADT. Transition probabilities and utilities were derived from the literature. Using a 10-year time horizon and willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY), net monetary benefit values were subsequently calculated for each treatment strategy. RESULTS At 10 years, the base case revealed a total cost of $141,148, $166,807, and $136,154 with QALYs of 4.63, 4.89, and 4.00, respectively, reflecting a net monetary benefit of $322,240, $322,018, and $263,407 for upfront MDT, upfront AAP + ADT, and upfront docetaxel + ADT, respectively. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation (1,000,000 simulations), upfront MDT was the cost-effective strategy in 53.6% of simulations. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed 95% confidence intervals for cost ($75,914-$179,862, $124,431-$223,892, and $103,298-$180,617) and utility in QALYs (3.85-6.12, 3.91-5.86, and 3.02-5.22) for upfront MDT, upfront AAP + ADT, and upfront docetaxel + ADT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS At 10 years, upfront MDT followed by salvage AAP + ADT, is comparably cost-effective compared with upfront standard-of-care systemic therapy and may be considered a viable treatment strategy, especially in patients wishing to defer systemic therapy for quality-of-life or comorbidity concerns. Additional studies are needed to determine whether MDT causes a sustained meaningful delay in disease natural history and whether any benefit exists in combining MDT with upfront advanced systemic therapy.
Collapse
|
36
|
Zheng P, Li L. FANCI Cooperates with IMPDH2 to Promote Lung Adenocarcinoma Tumor Growth via a MEK/ERK/MMPs Pathway. Onco Targets Ther 2020; 13:451-463. [PMID: 32021289 PMCID: PMC6970268 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s230333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Fanconi anemia complementation group I (FANCI) is a key protein in ribosome biogenesis and DNA repair. Here, we aimed to determine the clinical significance, prognostic value and biology functions of FANCI in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Methods The expression of FANCI in LUAD tissue and its relationship with patient outcomes were assessed using bioinformatics analysis, as well as quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blot analysis of LUAD tissue and adjacent normal lung tissue. The chi-squared test and Cox regression analysis were used to analyze the clinical significance of FANCI expression. The biological effects of FANCI knockdown in human LUAD cell lines were investigated by analysis of proliferation, colony formation, cell cycle distribution, migration, and invasion in vitro, and monitoring of tumor xenograft growth in vivo. FANCI interactions with IMPDH2 and involvement in MEK/ERK/MMPs signaling were analyzed using co-immunoprecipitation assays, immunofluorescence microscopy, and Western blotting. Results FANCI was identified as a hub gene for LUAD. FANCI expression was upregulated in LUAD tissues compared with normal lung tissues and was positively associated with lymphatic metastasis, distant metastasis, and poor outcome. FANCI was also an independent prognostic factor in LUAD patients. Knockdown of FANCI in LUAD cell lines decreased their proliferation, migration, invasion, and cell cycle progression in vitro, and decreased the growth of xenografts in mice. Direct binding of FANCI to IMPDH2 decreased IMPDH2 degradation, regulated activation of MEK/ERK/MMPs signaling. Overexpression of IMPDH2 reversed the inhibitory effects of FANCI knockdown. Conclusion FANCI may act as an oncogene in LUAD by cooperating with IMPDH2 to promote cell proliferation via the MEK/ERK/MMPs pathway. These results identify FANCI as a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for LUAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengchao Zheng
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Second People's Hospital of Jinmen, Jingmen, Hubei 448000, People's Republic of China.,Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Jingchu Center Hospital Affiliated to the Institute of Technology, Jingmen, Hubei 448000, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Second People's Hospital of Jinmen, Jingmen, Hubei 448000, People's Republic of China.,Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Jingchu Center Hospital Affiliated to the Institute of Technology, Jingmen, Hubei 448000, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|