1
|
Zhang J, Wang L, Xie C, Yang Z, Xu B, Li X. Novel utilization and quantification of Xsight diaphragm tracking for respiratory motion compensation in Cyberknife Synchrony treatment of liver tumors. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14341. [PMID: 38622894 PMCID: PMC11244677 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Xsight lung tracking system (XLTS) utilizes an advanced image processing algorithm to precisely identify the position of a tumor and determine its location in orthogonal x-ray images, instead of finding fiducials, thereby minimizing the risk of fiducial insertion-related side effects. To assess and gauge the effectiveness of CyberKnife Synchrony in treating liver tumors located in close proximity to or within the diaphragm, we employed the Xsight diaphragm tracking system (XDTS), which was based on the XLTS. METHODS We looked back at the treatment logs of 11 patients (8/11 [XDTS], 3/11 [Fiducial-based Target Tracking System-FTTS]) who had liver tumors in close proximity to or within the diaphragm. And the results are compared with the patients who undergo the treatment of FTTS. The breathing data information was calculated as a rolling average to reduce the effect of irregular breathing. We tested the tracking accuracy with a dynamic phantom (18023-A) on the basis of patient-specific respiratory curve. RESULTS The average values for the XDTS and FTTS correlation errors were 1.38 ± 0.65 versus 1.50 ± 0.26 mm (superior-inferior), 1.28 ± 0.48 versus 0.40 ± 0.09 mm (left-right), and 0.96 ± 0.32 versus 0.47 ± 0.10 mm(anterior-posterior), respectively. The prediction errors for two methods of 0.65 ± 0.16 versus 5.48 ± 3.33 mm in the S-I direction, 0.34 ± 0.10 versus 1.41 ± 0.76 mm in the A-P direction, and 0.22 ± 0.072 versus 1.22 ± 0.48 mm in the L-R direction. The coverage rate of FTTS slightly less than that of XDTS, such as 96.53 ± 8.19% (FTTS) versus 98.03 ± 1.54 (XDTS). The prediction error, the motion amplitude, and the variation of the respiratory center phase were strongly related to each other. Especially, the higher the amplitude and the variation, the higher the prediction error. CONCLUSION The diaphragm has the potential to serve as an alternative to gold fiducial markers for detecting liver tumors in close proximity or within it. We also found that we needed to reduce the motion amplitude and train the respiration of the patients during liver radiotherapy, as well as control and evaluate their breathing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianping Zhang
- Department of Radiation OncologyFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
- Fujian Medical University Union Clinical Medicine CollegeFujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
- Department of Medical Imaging TechnologyCollege of Medical ImagingFujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University)FuzhouChina
- Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies)FuzhouChina
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University)FuzhouChina
- Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies)FuzhouChina
| | - Chenyu Xie
- Department of Medical Imaging TechnologyCollege of Medical ImagingFujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
| | - Zhiyu Yang
- Department of Radiation OncologyFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
| | - Benhua Xu
- Department of Radiation OncologyFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
- Fujian Medical University Union Clinical Medicine CollegeFujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
- Department of Medical Imaging TechnologyCollege of Medical ImagingFujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University)FuzhouChina
- Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies)FuzhouChina
| | - Xiaobo Li
- Department of Radiation OncologyFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
- Fujian Medical University Union Clinical Medicine CollegeFujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
- Department of Medical Imaging TechnologyCollege of Medical ImagingFujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University)FuzhouChina
- Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies)FuzhouChina
- Department of Engineering PhysicsTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
deBettencourt MF, Liu Y, Cotler SJ, Molvar CA, Abdelrahman T, Thomas TO. SBRT vs. Y90: HCC Treatment Outcomes and Costs. Am J Clin Oncol 2024; 47:99-104. [PMID: 37981697 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) and Yttrium-90 (Y90) are among the ablative therapies used as treatment options for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To date, direct comparisons of the 2 modalities' outcomes and costs are lacking. This study aimed to analyze demographic, treatment, and cost information for patients with HCC treated with SBRT and Y90. METHODS Patients with HCC treated with SBRT or Y90 radioembolization between January 2018 and January 2020 at one institution were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and treatment data were compared utilizing χ 2 tests. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were applied to compare overall survival and progression-free survival in different treatment groups. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to analyze the unadjusted and adjusted survival differences. Ten SBRT and 10 Y90 patients were randomly selected for Medicare cost analysis. RESULTS Sixty-three patients received Y90, and 21 received SBRT. On univariable and multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in overall survival or progression-free survival between the Y90 and SBRT cohorts. SBRT patients had higher American Joint Committee on Cancer staging ( P =0.039), greater tumor size (4.07 vs. 2.96 cm, P =0.013), and greater rates of prior liver-directed therapy (71.4% SBRT vs. 12.7% Y90, P <0.001). The average cost for SBRT was $15,148, and Y90 was $41,360. CONCLUSIONS SBRT and Y90 are effective therapies in the treatment of HCC, specifically having similar overall survival and progression-free survival. Y90 was found to have a significantly higher cost than SBRT. This study demonstrates the need for prospective studies to assess these modalities in treating HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yirong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Northwestern Medical Group Northwestern Memorial Hospital Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | - Tarita O Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology Northwestern Medical Group Northwestern Memorial Hospital Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
D’Arienzo M, Mezzenga E, Capotosti A, Bagni O, Filippi L, Capogni M, Indovina L, Sarnelli A. The Importance of Uncertainty Analysis and Traceable Measurements in Routine Quantitative 90Y-PET Molecular Radiotherapy: A Multicenter Experience. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:1142. [PMID: 37631057 PMCID: PMC10459699 DOI: 10.3390/ph16081142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular Radiation Therapy (MRT) is a valid therapeutic option for a wide range of malignancies, such as neuroendocrine tumors and liver cancers. In its practice, it is generally acknowledged that there is a need to evaluate the influence of different factors affecting the accuracy of dose estimates and to define the actions necessary to maintain treatment uncertainties at acceptable levels. The present study addresses the problem of uncertainty propagation in 90Y-PET quantification. We assessed the quantitative accuracy in reference conditions of three PET scanners (namely, Siemens Biograph mCT, Siemens Biograph mCT flow, and GE Discovery DST) available at three different Italian Nuclear Medicine centers. Specific aspects of uncertainty within the quantification chain have been addressed, including the uncertainty in the calibration procedure. A framework based on the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) approach is proposed for modeling the uncertainty in the quantification processes, and ultimately, an estimation of the uncertainty achievable in clinical conditions is reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco D’Arienzo
- Medical Physics Section, ASL Roma 6, Borgo Garibaldi 12, 00041 Rome, Italy;
- UniCamillus International Medical University, 00131 Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Mezzenga
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (E.M.); (A.S.)
| | - Amedeo Capotosti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy;
| | - Oreste Bagni
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, 04100 Latina, Italy; (O.B.); (L.F.)
| | - Luca Filippi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, 04100 Latina, Italy; (O.B.); (L.F.)
| | - Marco Capogni
- ENEA, Italian National Institute of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy;
| | - Luca Indovina
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy;
| | - Anna Sarnelli
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (E.M.); (A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization followed by moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:293-303. [PMID: 36441171 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02022-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the gold standard treatment in intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but long-term disease control rates remain low. Herein, we compared results of TACE followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy (TACE-hRT) to surgical resection (SR) in early single or paucinodular intrahepatic HCC. METHODS Between June 2004 and November 2016, data on 160 consecutive patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A Child-Pugh A HCC treated with SR or TACE-hRT in our expert center were retrospectively reviewed. Time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared using the stabilized-weights inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score. RESULTS Ninety-eight patients underwent SR and 62 were treated by TACE-hRT. Median total dose of RT was 54 Gy (interquartile range [IQR] 54-54) in 3‑Gy fractions. Median OS follow-up was 93 months. TTP did not significantly differ between patients following SR and TACE-hRT, with 1‑year rates of 68.2% and 82.6% (p = 0.17), respectively. In contrast, PFS and OS were lower in the TACE-hRT group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.006), with a median OS of 37 vs. 63 months for patients with surgery and TACE-hRT, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a significant negative impact on PFS and OS was seen for age at diagnosis, on TTP for alcohol-related liver disease, and on OS for total number of HCC nodules. Symptomatic grade ≥ 3 adverse events were presented by 42 (42.9%) SR and 19 (30.6%) TACE-hRT patients (p = 0.17). CONCLUSION In patients presenting Child-Pugh A BCLC‑A HCC with high risk for surgical complications, TACE-hRT can be an effective and safe treatment. However, surgical management remains the standard of care whenever possible.
Collapse
|
5
|
Taswell CS, Studenski M, Pennix T, Stover B, Georgiou M, Venkat S, Jones P, Zikria J, Thornton L, Yechieli R, Mohan P, Portelance L, Spieler B. For Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Yttrium-90 Microspheres, Dose Volumetrics on Post-Treatment Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT Predict Clinical Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030645. [PMID: 36765603 PMCID: PMC9913422 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
In transarterial radioembolization (TARE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres, recent studies correlate dosimetry from bremsstrahlung single photon emission tomography (SPECT/CT) with treatment outcomes; however, these studies focus on measures of central tendency rather than volumetric coverage metrics commonly used in radiation oncology. We hypothesized that three-dimensional (3D) isodose coverage of gross tumor volume (GTV) is the driving factor in HCC treatment response to TARE and is best assessed using advanced dosimetry techniques applied to nuclear imaging of actual Y-90 biodistribution. We reviewed 51 lobar TARE Y-90 treatments of 43 HCC patients. Dose prescriptions were 120 Gy for TheraSpheres and 85 Gy for SIR-Spheres. All patients underwent post-TARE Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT imaging. Commercial software was used to contour gross tumor volume (GTV) and liver on post-TARE SPECT/CT. Y-90 dose distributions were calculated using the Local Deposition Model based on post-TARE SPECT/CT activity maps. Median gross tumor volume (GTV) dose; GTV receiving less than 100 Gy, 70 Gy and 50 Gy; minimum dose covering the hottest 70%, 95%, and 98% of the GTV (D70, D95, D98); mean dose to nontumorous liver, and disease burden (GTV/liver volume) were obtained. Clinical outcomes were collected for all patients by chart and imaging review. HCC treatment response was assessed according to the modified response criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) guidelines. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival estimates and multivariate regression analyses (MVA) were performed using STATA. Median survival was 22.5 months for patients achieving objective response (OR) in targeted lesions (complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per mRECIST) vs. 7.6 months for non-responders (NR, stable disease or disease progression per mRECIST). On MVA, the volume of underdosed tumor (GTV receiving less than 100 Gy) was the only significant dosimetric predictor for CR (p = 0.0004) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.003). All targets with less than CR (n = 39) had more than 20 cc of underdosed tumor. D70 (p = 0.038) correlated with OR, with mean D70 of 95 Gy for responders and 60 Gy for non-responders (p = 0.042). On MVA, mean dose to nontumorous liver trended toward significant association with grade 3+ toxicity (p = 0.09) and correlated with delivered activity (p < 0.001) and burden of disease (p = 0.05). Dosimetric models supplied area under the curve estimates of > 0.80 predicting CR, OR, and ≥grade 3 acute toxicity. Dosimetric parameters derived from the retrospective analysis of post-TARE Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT after lobar treatment of HCC suggest that volumetric coverage of GTV, not a high mean or median dose, is the driving factor in treatment response and that this is best assessed through the analysis of actual Y-90 biodistribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Crystal Seldon Taswell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Matthew Studenski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Thomas Pennix
- Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1600 NW 10th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Bryan Stover
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Mike Georgiou
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Shree Venkat
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Patricia Jones
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Joseph Zikria
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Lindsay Thornton
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Raphael Yechieli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Prasoon Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Lorraine Portelance
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Benjamin Spieler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hatzidakis A, Müller L, Krokidis M, Kloeckner R. Local and Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Future Combinations. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102469. [PMID: 35626073 PMCID: PMC9139740 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Percutaneous interventional radiological techniques offer many alternatives for treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) using local anesthesia and sedation. These methods aim to destroy the malignant tumors locally without affecting the non-malignant liver. In this way, complications are kept low and patient recovery is quick. Indications depend on tumor size, type and stage, as well as patient’s condition, liver function and co-morbidities. In recent years, a lot of research has been made in combining such approaches with immune therapy, but there is still much work to be done. This manuscript tries to analyze where we stand today and explain, using a comprehensive algorithm, the treatment options for each different clinical condition. Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be treated by local and regional methods of percutaneous interventional radiological techniques. Indications depend on tumor size, type and stage, as well as patient’s condition, liver function and co-morbidities. According to international classification systems such as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, very early, early or intermediate staged tumors can be treated either with ablative methods or with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), depending on tumor characteristics. The combination of both allows for individualized forms of treatment with the ultimate goal of improving response and survival. In recent years, a lot of research has been carried out in combining locoregional approaches with immune therapy. Although recent developments in systemic treatment, especially immunotherapy, seem quite promising and have expanded possible combined treatment options, there is still not enough evidence in their favor. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive up-to-date overview of all these techniques, explaining indications, contraindications, technical problems, outcomes, results and complications. Moreover, combinations of percutaneous treatment with each other or with immunotherapy and future options will be discussed. Use of all those methods as down-staging or bridging solutions until surgery or transplantation are taken into consideration will also be reviewed. Conclusion: Local and regional therapies remain a mainstay of curative and palliative treatment of patients with HCC. Currently, evidence on potential combination of the local and regional treatment options with each other as well as with other treatment modalities is growing and has the potential to further individualize HCC therapy. To identify the most suitable treatment option out of these new various options, a repeated interdisciplinary discussion of each case by the tumor board is of utmost importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Hatzidakis
- Department of Radiology, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Correspondence:
| | - Lukas Müller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (L.M.); (R.K.)
| | - Miltiadis Krokidis
- 1st Department of Radiology, Areteion Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece;
| | - Roman Kloeckner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (L.M.); (R.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Siblini Y, Chéry C, Rouyer P, Raso J, Julien A, Hergalant S, François A, Bezdetnaya L, Vogin G, Guéant JL, Oussalah A. Ionizing radiations induce shared epigenomic signatures unraveling adaptive mechanisms of cancerous cell lines with or without methionine dependency. Clin Epigenetics 2021; 13:212. [PMID: 34852845 PMCID: PMC8638416 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-021-01199-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although radiation therapy represents a core cancer treatment modality, its efficacy is hampered by radioresistance. The effect of ionizing radiations (IRs) is well known regarding their ability to induce genetic alterations; however, their impact on the epigenome landscape in cancer, notably at the CpG dinucleotide resolution, remains to be further deciphered. In addition, no evidence is available regarding the effect of IRs on the DNA methylome profile according to the methionine dependency phenotype, which represents a hallmark of metabolic adaptation in cancer. METHODS We used a case-control study design with a fractionated irradiation regimen on four cancerous cell lines representative of HCC (HepG2), melanoma (MeWo and MeWo-LC1, which exhibit opposed methionine dependency phenotypes), and glioblastoma (U251). We performed high-resolution genome-wide DNA methylome profiling using the MethylationEPIC BeadChip on baseline conditions, irradiated cell lines (cumulative dose of 10 Gy), and non-irradiated counterparts. We performed epigenome-wide association studies to assess the effect of IRs and methionine-dependency-oriented analysis by carrying out epigenome-wide conditional logistic regression. We looked for epigenome signatures at the locus and single-probe (CpG dinucleotide) levels and through enrichment analyses of gene ontologies (GO). The EpiMet project was registered under the ID#AAP-BMS_003_211. RESULTS EWASs revealed shared GO annotation pathways associated with increased methylation signatures for several biological processes in response to IRs, including blood circulation, plasma membrane-bounded cell projection organization, cell projection organization, multicellular organismal process, developmental process, and animal organ morphogenesis. Epigenome-wide conditional logistic regression analysis on the methionine dependency phenotype highlighted several epigenome signatures related to cell cycle and division and responses to IR and ultraviolet light. CONCLUSIONS IRs generated a variation in the methylation level of a high number of CpG probes with shared biological pathways, including those associated with cell cycle and division, responses to IRs, sustained angiogenesis, tissue invasion, and metastasis. These results provide insight on shared adaptive mechanisms of the epigenome in cancerous cell lines in response to IR. Future experiments should focus on the tryptic association between IRs, the initiation of a radioresistance phenotype, and their interaction with methionine dependency as a hallmark of metabolic adaptation in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef Siblini
- INSERM, UMR_S1256, NGERE (Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure), Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, University of Lorraine, 9 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Céline Chéry
- INSERM, UMR_S1256, NGERE (Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure), Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, University of Lorraine, 9 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy, France
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Personalized Therapeutics, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Reference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (ORPHA67872), University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Pierre Rouyer
- INSERM, UMR_S1256, NGERE (Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure), Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, University of Lorraine, 9 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Jérémie Raso
- INSERM, UMR_S1256, NGERE (Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure), Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, University of Lorraine, 9 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Amélia Julien
- INSERM, UMR_S1256, NGERE (Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure), Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, University of Lorraine, 9 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Sébastien Hergalant
- INSERM, UMR_S1256, NGERE (Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure), Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, University of Lorraine, 9 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy, France
| | | | - Lina Bezdetnaya
- Lorraine Institute of Oncology, 54000, Nancy, France
- CNRS, UMR_7039, CRAN (Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy), Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, University of Lorraine, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Guillaume Vogin
- UMR_7365, IMoPA (Ingénierie Moléculaire Et Ingénierie Articulaire), Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, CNRS-UL, University of Lorraine, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Louis Guéant
- INSERM, UMR_S1256, NGERE (Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure), Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, University of Lorraine, 9 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy, France.
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Personalized Therapeutics, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
- Reference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (ORPHA67872), University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| | - Abderrahim Oussalah
- INSERM, UMR_S1256, NGERE (Nutrition, Genetics, and Environmental Risk Exposure), Faculty of Medicine of Nancy, University of Lorraine, 9 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, Nancy, France.
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Personalized Therapeutics, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
- Reference Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (ORPHA67872), University Hospital of Nancy, 54000, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heller M, Parikh ND, Fidelman N, Owen D. Frontiers of therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3648-3659. [PMID: 33837453 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03065-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma continues to increase worldwide. Fortunately, there have been notable recent advances in locoregional and systemic therapy. In this current review, we will highlight these new developments and future directions of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment and address the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to treatment.
Collapse
|
9
|
Uchinami Y, Katoh N, Abo D, Taguchi H, Yasuda K, Nishioka K, Soyama T, Morita R, Miyamoto N, Suzuki R, Sho T, Nakai M, Ogawa K, Kakisaka T, Orimo T, Kamiyama T, Shimizu S, Aoyama H. Treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system for hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatol Res 2021; 51:870-879. [PMID: 33894086 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM To report the outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system for hepatocellular carcinoma patients. METHODS From January 2005 to July 2018, 63 patients with 74 lesions with a maximum diameter ≤52 mm were treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system. No patient with a Child-Pugh Score ≥9 was included, and 85.6% had a score of 5 or 6. Using the biological effective dose (BED) with an α/β ratio of 10 (BED10 ), the median dose in BED10 at the reference point was 76.8 Gy (range 60-122.5 Gy). Overall survival (OS) and local control rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS With a median follow-up period of 24.6 months (range 0.9-118.4 months), the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 86.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 75.8-93.3) and 71.1% (57.8-81.6), respectively. The 2-year OS was 89.6% in patients with the baseline modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade =1, and 61.7% in patients with grade ≥2a. In the multivariate analysis, the mALBI grade (=1 vs. ≥2a) was a significant factor for OS (p = 0.028, 95% CI 1.11-6.18). The 1-year and 2-year local control rates were 100% (100-100%) and 92.0% (77.5-97.5%). The local control rates were significantly higher in the BED10 ≥100 Gy group than in the BED10 <100 Gy group (2-year 100% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.049) at the reference point. CONCLUSION This retrospective study of stereotactic body radiotherapy using real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma showed favorable outcomes with lower incidence of toxicities, especially in patients treated with BED10 ≥100 Gy to the reference point.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Uchinami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Daisuke Abo
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Taguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Koichi Yasuda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nishioka
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takeshi Soyama
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Ryo Morita
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Naoki Miyamoto
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Ryusuke Suzuki
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takuya Sho
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Masato Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Koji Ogawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Tatsuhiko Kakisaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Orimo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Toshiya Kamiyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu J, Ladbury C, Amini A, Glaser S, Kessler J, Lee A, Chen YJ. Combination of yttrium-90 radioembolization with stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of portal vein tumor thrombosis. Radiat Oncol J 2021; 39:113-121. [PMID: 34619828 PMCID: PMC8497860 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2021.00213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) from cancer involving the liver carries a dismal prognosis, with median overall survival (OS) ranging from 2 to 5 months. While treatment with yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization alone may improve outcomes, overall prognosis remains poor. We hypothesize that the combination of 90Y radioembolization to the parenchymal component of the tumor and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the vascular component is a safe and effective means of improving outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A single center retrospective review identified 12 patients with cancers involving the liver who received both 90Y radioembolization and SBRT to the PVTT between May 2015 to August 2020. Primary endpoint was the 90-day toxicity rate by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Secondary endpoints were the best response rate based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1, local control rate, portal vein (PV) patency rate, and median OS. RESULTS Patients received a median 90Y dose of 104.3 Gy (range, 83.3 to 131.7 Gy) and a median 5-fraction SBRT dose of 32.5 Gy (range, 27.5 to 50 Gy). There were no late toxicities reported, and only 7 acute grade 1 toxicities reported: elevation of liver function tests (17%), nausea (17%), fatigue (17%), and esophagitis (8%). Local control was 83%. 58% of patients had a patent PV after treatment. With a median follow-up time of 28 months, 1-year OS was 55% with a median OS of 14 months. CONCLUSION Combination 90Y radioembolization and SBRT appears to be safe and effective in the treatment of PVTT. Larger prospective studies are warranted to better evaluate this combination treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Colton Ladbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Scott Glaser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kessler
- Department of Interventional Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Aram Lee
- Department of Interventional Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yi-Jen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen LC, Lin HY, Hung SK, Chiou WY, Lee MS. Role of modern radiotherapy in managing patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:2434-2457. [PMID: 34092968 PMCID: PMC8160620 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i20.2434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer. Several treatment options are available for managing HCC patients, classified roughly as local, local-regional, and systemic therapies. The high post-monotherapy recurrence rate of HCC urges the need for the use of combined modalities to increase tumor control and patient survival. Different international guidelines offer treatment recommendations based on different points of view and classification systems. Radiotherapy (RT) is a well-known local-regional treatment modality for managing many types of cancers, including HCC. However, only some of these treatment guidelines include RT, and the role of combined modalities is rarely mentioned. Hence, the present study reviewed clinical evidence for the use of different combined modalities in managing HCC, focusing on modern RT's role. Modern RT has an increased utility in managing HCC patients, mainly due to two driving forces. First, technological advancement (e.g., stereotactic body radiotherapy and advanced proton-beam therapy) enables precise delivery of radiation to increase tumor control and reduce side effects in the surrounding normal tissue. Second, the boom in developing target therapies and checkpoint-blockade immunotherapy prolongs overall survival in HCC patients, re-emphasizing the importance of local tumor control. Remarkably, RT combines with systemic therapies to generate the systemic therapy augmented by radiotherapy effect, a benefit now being actively investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang-Cheng Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chia-Yi 62247, Taiwan
| | - Hon-Yi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chia-Yi 62247, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
- Institute of Molecular Biology, National Chung Cheng University, Min-Hsiung, Chia-Yi 62102, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Kai Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chia-Yi 62247, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yen Chiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chia-Yi 62247, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
| | - Moon-Sing Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chia-Yi 62247, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pérez-Romasanta LA, González-Del Portillo E, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez A, Matías-Pérez Á. Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Radiosensitization Strategies and Radiation-Immunotherapy Combination. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13020192. [PMID: 33430362 PMCID: PMC7825787 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiotherapy is rapidly turning into a crucial component of multidisciplinary treatment for liver cancer because many patients are not surgical treatment candidates. Thanks to technical developments, radiotherapy have achieved high precision treatments, making it possible to eliminate tumor cells without severe damage to the liver and other organs. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy is an advanced radiotherapy technique able to eradicate malignant tumors wherever they are located in properly selected patients. The best use of radiotherapy, the most fruitful radiotherapy strategy, and the best way to combine it with other treatments for liver cancer are largely unknown. Radiosensitizers, agents that can potentiate radiotherapy, could broaden the radiotherapeutic landscape. Radiotherapy potentiation can be achieved with diverse treatments, not only drugs but also nanoparticles. In order to clear up the performance of radiotherapy in liver cancer management in the future and the best ways to potentiate its effects, considerable medical research is needed. Abstract Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging ablative modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Most patients with HCC have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis, and therefore, are not candidates for definitive-intent therapies such as resection or transplantation. For this reason, various alternative local and regional therapies have been used to prevent disease progression, palliate symptoms, and delay liver failure. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a non-invasive technique of delivering ablative doses of radiation to tumors while sparing normal or non-tumor hepatic tissue. Incorporation of SBRT in multidisciplinary HCC management is gradual, initially applied when other liver-directed therapies have failed or are contraindicated, and tried in combination with other locoregional or systemic therapies for more unfavorable conditions by more experienced teams. In order to improve SBRT therapeutic ratio, there has been much interest in augmenting the effect of radiation on tumors by combining it with chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapeutics, nanoparticles, and immunotherapy. This review aims to synthesize available evidence to evaluate the clinical feasibility and efficacy of SBRT for HCC, and to explore novel radio-potentiation concepts by combining SBRT with novel therapeutics. It is expected that those approaches would result in improved therapeutic outcomes, even though many questions remain with regard to the optimal way to assemble treatments. Further trials are needed to evaluate and consolidate these promising therapies for HCC.
Collapse
|
13
|
Benderli Cihan Y. SBRT, TACE, TARE, or Combined? in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Cancer. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2020; 36:807-808. [PMID: 32898438 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2020.4103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|