FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Stage III C Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Radiotherapy or Radiochemotherapy

Objective: Since the update of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging criteria, there have been few reports on the prognosis of stage III C cervical cancer. Moreover, some studies have drawn controversial conclusions, necessitating further verification. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and determine the prognostic factors for stage III C cervical cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. Methods: The data of 117 stage III C cervical cancer patients (98 III C1 and 19 III C2) who underwent radical radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression model. The risk of para-aortic lymph node metastasis (LNM) in all patients was assessed through Chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis. Results: For stage III C1 and III C2 patients, the 3-year OS rates were 77.6% and 63.2% (P = .042), and the 3-year DFS rates were 70.4% and 47.4% (P = .003), respectively. The pretreatment location of pelvic LNM, histological type, and FIGO stage was associated with OS (P = .033, .003, .042, respectively); the number of pelvic LNM and FIGO stage were associated with DFS (P = .015, .003, respectively). The histological type was an independent prognostic indicator for OS, and the numbers of pelvic LNM and FIGO stage were independent prognostic indicators for DFS. Furthermore, a pelvic LNM largest short-axis diameter ≥ 1.5 cm and the presence of common iliac LNM were identified as high-risk factors influencing para-aortic LNM in stage III C patients (P = .046, .006, respectively). Conclusions: The results of this study validated the 2018 FIGO staging criteria for stage III C cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. These findings may enhance our understanding of the updated staging criteria and contribute to better management of patients in stage III C.

Initial treatment for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer based on histological type: A 14-year multicenter study

BACKGROUND

To compare the oncological outcomes of radical chemotherapy (R-CT), abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery (NACT) for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer, according to histological types: squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC)/adenosquamous cell carcinoma (ASC).

METHODS

A comparison of 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was performed for the SCC and AC/ASC subgroups for the three initial treatments, assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and validated using propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

The study included 4086 patients: R-CT, n = 1913; ARH, n = 1529; and NACT, n = 644. AC/ASC had a lower survival rate (63.7%) than SCC (73.6%) and a higher recurrence and mortality rate (36.3% and 26.4%, respectively). The 5-year OS and DFS rates were different in the SCC group for R-CT, ARH, and NACT (OS: 69.8% vs. 80.8% vs. 73.0%, p < 0.001; DFS: 66.7% vs. 70.7% vs. 56.4%, p < 0.001), also in the AC/ASC group (OS: 46.1% vs. 70.6% vs. 55.6%, p < 0.001; DFS: 42.7% vs. 64.6% vs. 40.8%, p < 0.001). As for initial treatment, survival outcomes were worse for AC/ASC treated with R-CT and ARH than for SCC (both p < 0.05), with no group differences between the two treated with NACT.

CONCLUSION

Initial treatment influences oncological prognosis for patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer. ARH is an alternative treatment for stage IIIC cervical SCC and AC/ASC, and NACT needs to be chosen with caution, moreover, R-CT for AC/ASC requires careful selection.

Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Dose Escalation in Node-Positive Cervical Cancer: 5-Year Experience in a Single Institution

This study retrospectively evaluates clinical outcomes of dose escalation to involved nodes using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for node-positive locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) at a single institution. Consecutive patients with node-positive LACC (FIGO2018 IIIC1-IVA) who received definitive chemoradiotherapy by VMAT 45 Gy in 25 fractions with SIB to 55-57.5 Gy, followed by magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) between 2018 and 2022 were identified. A standardized strategy regarding nodal boost delivery and elective para-aortic (PAO) irradiation was employed. Primary endpoints were involved nodal control (INC) and regional nodal control (RNC). Secondary endpoints were pelvic control (PC), locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), failure pattern, and radiotherapy-related toxicities. A total of 234 involved nodes (182 pelvic and 52 PAO) in 54 patients, with a median of 3 involved nodes per patient (range 1-16), were analyzed. After a median follow-up of 19.6 months, excellent INC was achieved, with four (2%) boost-volume failures occurring in three patients. The 2-year actuarial RNC, PC, LRC, DFS, and OS were 93%, 87%, 87%, 78%, and 85%, respectively. Adenocarcinoma histology was associated with worse RNC (p = 0.02) and OS (p = 0.04), whereas the primary tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was associated with worse PC (p = 0.04) and LRC (p = 0.046) on univariate analysis. The incidence of grade ≥3 acute and late radiotherapy-related toxicity were 2% and 4%, respectively. Treatment of node-positive LACC with VMAT with SIB allows safe and effective dose escalation. The 5-year local experience demonstrated excellent treatment outcomes without additional toxicity.

Prognostic significance of index (LANR) composed of preoperative lymphocytes, albumin, and neutrophils in patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of preoperative lymphocytes, albumin, neutrophils, and LANR in the prognosis of patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer (CC).

METHODS

We made a retrospective analysis of the clinical information and related materials of 202 patients with stage IB-IIA primary cervical cancer who had undergone a radical hysterectomy in the Department of Gynecology at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University between January 2017 and December 2018. The definition of LANR was as follows: LANR, lymphocyte × albumin / neutrophil. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was generated to determine the best cut-off values for these parameters, as well as the sensitivity and specificity of LANR in predicting recurrence and survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to draw survival curves in our survival analysis. Univariate analysis, multifactorial analysis, and subgroup analysis were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of LANR in overall and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time of the study was 55 months. In overall survival, the area under the curve for LANR was 0.704 (95% CI: 0.590-0.818, p<0.05). And in progression-free survival, the area under the curve for LANR was 0.745 (95% CI: 0.662-0.828, p<0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the value of LANR was associated with both overall survival and progression-free survival (p< 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that OS (p< 0.001) and PFS (p< 0.001) in patients with high LANR levels were significantly higher than those with low LANR levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that LANR might serve as a clinically reliable and effective independent prognostic indicator in patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer.

Incomplete cisplatin regimens in chemoradiation and its effect on outcomes for locally advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with receipt of incomplete cisplatin during chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer and its impact on outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation at our institution between November 2015 and August 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients who received ≤4 cycles were identified as the 'incomplete' cohort and those who received 5-6 cycles as the 'complete' cohort. The primary endpoint of incomplete chemotherapy was evaluated with multivariable logistic regression. Secondary endpoints of locoregional failure, overall survival, and distant failure were evaluated in multivariable Cox and Fine-Gray models.

RESULTS

Of 140 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer that underwent chemoradiation, 22 (15.7%) received an incomplete cisplatin regimen (8 with 0 cycles, 14 with 1-4 cycles). The most common reasons for receiving incomplete treatment were comorbidities/infections (41%), unmet laboratory parameters (27%), and cisplatin intolerance (14%). In multivariable models, only poor (2-4) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was a significant predictor as these patients were 41 times more likely to receive incomplete chemotherapy (odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.57 to 375.15, p<0.001). Median follow-up time was 20 months (range 4-64). In multivariable models, receipt of incomplete cisplatin was significantly associated with higher recurrence (locoregional failure hazard ratio (HR) 3.02, 95% CI 1.08 to 8.45, p=0.03; distant failure HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.47, p=0.02) and worse survival (overall survival HR 4.91, 95% CI 1.27 to 18.98, p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Incomplete cisplatin regimen was associated with worse oncologic outcomes. Poor performance status was the only factor associated with receiving an incomplete regimen. This notable proportion of patients may be a target for better tolerated novel targeted anticancer agents in order to improve outcomes.

Disparities in time to start of definitive radiation treatment for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer

Background

Chemoradiation or radiation therapy alone are curative standards for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Objective

To investigate factors that influence time to initiation of chemoradiation or radiation and the subsequent impact of time to treatment on recurrence and survival outcomes.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation or radiation at our institution between November 2015 and August 2020 were retrospectively identified. Time to treatment initiation was defined as the number of days from date of diagnosis (via biopsy) to the start date of radiation. The cohort was stratified by the median time to treatment into early (<75 days) and delayed (≥75 days) cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to examine factors associated with delayed time to treatment.

Results

We identified 143 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who underwent definitive chemoradiation or radiation. Median follow-up time was 18 months (range 2–62). A total of 71 (49.7%) patients had time to treatment <75 days and 72 (50.3%) patients had time to treatment ≥75 days. The delayed cohort had a higher proportion of Hispanic patients (51.4% vs 31.0%, p=0.04). In multivariable modeling, Hispanic women were 2.71 times more likely (p=0.04) to undergo delayed time to treatment than non-Hispanic white women. Additionally, patients with stage >IIB disease were less likely to undergo delayed time to treatment (OR 0.26, p=0.02) than patients with stage <IIB disease. There was no interaction between race/ethnicity and disease stage. Delayed time to treatment was not associated with inferior overall survival, loco-regional failure, or distant failure.

Conclusion

Hispanic patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were more likely to receive delayed time to definitive treatment of ≥75 days. Further studies examining the presence of similar disparities in delay to definitive treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer at other institutions and settings are warranted.

Concurrent chemoradiation and brachytherapy alone or in combination with nelfinavir in locally advanced cervical cancer (NELCER): study protocol for a phase III trial

INTRODUCTION

In locally advanced cervical cancer, nodal, local and distant relapse continue to be significant patterns of relapse. Therefore, strategies to improve the efficacy of chemoradiation are desirable such as biological pathway modifiers and immunomodulating agents. This trial will investigate the impact of nelfinavir, a protease inhibitor that targets the protein kinase B (AKT) pathway on disease-free survival (DFS).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Radiosensitising effect of nelfinavir in locally advanced carcinoma of cervix is a single-centre, open-label, parallel-group, 1:1 randomised phase-III study. Patients aged over 18 years with a diagnosis of carcinoma cervix stage III are eligible for the study. After consenting, patients will undergo randomisation to chemoradiation and brachytherapy arm or nelfinavir with chemoradiation and brachytherapy arm. The primary aim of the study is to compare the difference in 3-year DFS between the two arms. Secondary aims are locoregional control, overall survival, toxicity and quality of life between the two arms. Pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its impact on tumour AKT, programmed cell death ligand 1, cluster of differentiation 4, cluster of differentiation 8 and natural killer 1.1 expression will be investigated. The overall sample size of 348 with 1 planned interim analysis achieves 80% power at a 0.05 significance level to detect a HR of 0.66 when the proportion surviving in the control arm is 0.65. The planned study duration is 8 years.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial is approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee-I of Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai (reference number: IEC/0317/1543/001) and will be monitored by the data safety monitoring committee. The study results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals, and conference presentations. Study participants will be accrued after obtaining written informed consent from them. The confidentiality and privacy of study participants will be maintained.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2017/08/009265) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03256916).

Prognostic Analysis and Comparison of the 2014 and 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System on Overall Survival in Patients with Stage IIB-IVA Cervix Carcinoma

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IIB–IVA cervix carcinoma (CC) who underwent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BRT) and to compare the prognostic accuracy of the 2014 and 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

Patients with a histopathological diagnosis of CC between 2004 and 2016 were included. The primary endpoint was OS. The prognostic significance for OS was analyzed by the Cox regression model. Prognostic accuracy in evaluating 3- and 5-year OS in different staging systems was evaluated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (tdROC) curves.

Results

A total of 2585 patients with stage IIB–IVA CC, staged according to the 2014 FIGO staging system, were included in the study. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 63.9% and 56.6%, respectively, with a median OS of 98 months. Independent variables, such as older age at diagnosis, histological grades apart from well or moderately differentiated, large tumor size, advanced tumor stages classified according to the 2014 and 2018 FIGO staging systems and treatment without chemotherapy or unknown were associated with a worse OS. A tdROC analysis conducted using DeLong’s tests revealed no significant difference in the prediction of 3- and 5-year OS between the 2014 and 2018 FIGO staging systems (P = 0.912 and 0.863, respectively).

Conclusion

Both 2014 and 2018 FIGO staging systems were strong prognostic factors for OS. No significant risk classification was observed for stage IIIC1 disease in the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for patients who underwent EBRT and BRT.

Impact of nodal boost irradiation and MR-based brachytherapy on oncologic outcomes in node-positive cervical cancer

This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the impact of dose-escalated irradiation of nodal metastases on clinical outcomes compared to no boost in patients with node-positive, bulky, locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) undergoing standard chemoradiation and MRI-based brachytherapy.

METHODS

This comparative study included 161 patients with node-positive LACC treated with definitive chemoradiation and MRI-based brachytherapy. The prospective Boost arm accrued 71 patients to receive nodal boost either sequentially or simultaneously to an equivalent dose of 60 Gy. The control arm comprised 90 patients treated before this protocol period with no additional nodal boost.

RESULT

Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. All patients had at least one tumor dimension >5 cm at presentation, and 31% had para-aortic node involvement. With a median follow-up of 36 months (IQR:19-50.5), the overall 3-year Local control rate was 88.8%. The 3-year Regional control (93% vs. 80%, p = 0.035) was statistically better in the Boost arm. No nodal failure was observed in nodes <3 cc and < 2 cm, even in the No-boost arm. There was no significant difference in Disease-free survival (67.6% vs. 58.9%,p = 0.454) and Overall Survival (78.9% vs. 74.4%,p = 0.87) between the two arms. Incidence of acute or late toxicities did not differ significantly with nodal boost or the boost delivery technique.

CONCLUSION

The addition of external radiation nodal boost to standard treatment of high-volume cervical cancer has improved pelvic control with an acceptable rate of toxicities. However, high systemic failures continue to pose a challenge in improving survival outcomes.

Incidence, Treatment and Outcomes of Cervical Cancer in Low- and Middle-income Countries

Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in developing nations. It has had a tremendous impact on the lifetime of millions of women over the last century and continues to do so. In this collaborative clinicians' review, we highlight the incidence, treatment and clinical outcomes of cervical cancer in low-income (LICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) across Asia, South America, South Africa and Eastern Europe. With the cervical cancer burden and locally advanced cancers being high, the majority of LICs/LMICs have been striving to adhere to optimal evaluation and treatment guidelines. However, the huge gap in resource availability, rural versus urban disparity and access to resources have led to poor compliance to evaluation, treatment and post-treatment rehabilitation. To mitigate the overwhelming numbers, various treatment strategies like neoadjuvant chemotherapy, hypofractionation radiation schedules (both external and brachytherapy) have been attempted with no major success. Also, the compliance to concurrent chemoradiation in various regions is a major challenge. With the burden of advanced cancers, the lack of palliative care services and their integration in cancer care is still a reality.

Methylation of PAX1 gene promoter in the prediction of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy efficacy in cervical cancer

Objectives: Cervical cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. In currently, aberrant methylation of PAX1 is found in variety of solid tumors, including cervical cancer. In addition, the role of PAX1 gene methylation in cervical cancer and precancerous lesions screening has been confirmed in previous study. Here, we evaluated the predictive value of PAX1 methylation in concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) outcomes in cervical cancer.

Methods: This study enrolled 82 cervical cancer patients from August 2018 to August 2020. We compared the clinical results between different PAX1 methylation status. Hyper-methylation patients were subjects to MRI and quantitative methylation-specific PCR (QMSP) for PAX1 before, in the middle, immediately after, 1 month and 3 months after CCRT. The changes in PAX1 methylation during CCRT were analyzed.

Results: The lower PAX1 methylation status were related to a poor tumor response. Based on the MRI findings three months post-treatment, the hypermethylated patients were classified into the complete response (CR; n=50) and partial remission (PR; n=18) groups. The average PAX1 △Cp value of CR and PR groups before radiotherapy was 5.08±1.98 and 4.32±2.00 respectively, and after concurrent chemo-radiotherapy was significantly increased to 17.35±4.96 and 16.99±6.17, respectively (P<0.05). Furthermore, the PAX1 △Cp value between CR and PR groups were significantly different at mid-treatment and performed well in predicting short-term efficacy (AUC 0.84) in this period, and its sensitivity and specificity for predicting PR were 0.72 and 0.88, respectively.

Conclusion: The PAX1 methylation level may predict the sensitivity and efficacy of CCRT in cervical cancer.

Treatment Outcome and Prognosis Factors of FIGO 2018 Stage III Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation in Vietnam

Objective:

This study aimed to analyze the treatment outcome and toxicities, along with prognosis factors of patients with FIGO 2018 stage III cervical cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation.

Methods:

A total of 83 stage III cervical cancer patients with good performance status (ECOG PS 0, 1) were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) combined with chemotherapy (weekly cisplatin), followed by high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy between January 2017 and March 2019 at Vietnam National Cancer hospital. Treatment outcomes and prognosis factors were assessed along with acute and late toxicities.

Results:

The 3-year DFS was 67.8% and 3-year OS was 80.3%. On multivariate analyses, short axis of pelvic lymph node diameter of ≥ 15mm, invasion of the lower third of vagina and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were identified as adverse prognostic factors for DFS. The cumulative incidence rate of gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity (≥ grade 2) at the 3-year follow-up were 29.6% and 11.6%, respectively.

Conclusions:

3D CRT and HDR brachytherapy with concurrent chemotherapy is an effective treatment, with acceptable toxicity for FIGO 2018 stage III cervical cancer in Vietnam.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer

OBJECTIVE

To validate the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecologic and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system in patients who underwent diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiotherapy (RT) for locally advanced cervix cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed 677 patients who were diagnosed with pelvic MRI and treated with definitive (chemo-)RT for locally advanced cervix cancer (stage IB2/IIA2-IVA or N+) between 1992 and 2018. Patients were classified according to 2009 and 2018 FIGO staging, and survival outcomes were compared. We developed a nomogram to improve prediction of progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes were positive in 331 (48.9%) and 78 (11.5%) patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 77.9 months, the 5-year PFS was 83.5%, 65.2%, 71.0%, 60.6%, 37.6% and 38.9% for IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB and IVA according to FIGO 2009 and 88.9%, 60.0%, 73.8%, 66.7%, 36.3%, 68.9%, 43.6%, and 38.9% for IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC1, IIIC2, and IVA according to FIGO 2018, respectively. Survival of stage IIIC cervix cancer depended on the local extent of the tumor: the 5-year PFS of T1, T2, and T3 stages were 80.3%, 73.9%, and 45.5% for IIIC1 and 100%, 44.9%, and 23.4% for IIIC2. Histology, tumor size, node metastasis, FIGO 2009, and treatment modality were independent prognostic factors in the Cox regression analysis, and the nomogram incorporating these factors outperformed FIGO 2009 and FIGO 2018 (AUC 0.718 vs. 0.616 vs. 0.594).

CONCLUSIONS

FIGO 2018 revision was associated with heterogenous outcomes among stage III cervix cancer patients. Our nomogram can assist the FIGO system in predicting PFS after definitive RT.