Phase I Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation in Pancreatic Cancer

SBRT for Pancreatic Cancer: A Radiosurgery Society Case-Based Practical Guidelines to Challenging Cases

The use of radiation therapy (RT) for pancreatic cancer continues to be controversial, despite recent technical advances. Improvements in systemic control have created an evolving role for RT and the need for improved local tumor control, but currently, no standardized approach exists. Advances in stereotactic body RT, motion management, real-time image guidance, and adaptive therapy have renewed hopes of improved outcomes in this devastating disease with one of the lowest survival rates. This case-based guide provides a practical framework for delivering stereotactic body RT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In conjunction with multidisciplinary care, an intradisciplinary approach should guide treatment of the high-risk cases outlined within these guidelines for prospective peer review and treatment safety discussions.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer - A systematic review of prospective data

Purpose

This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarize the current prospective evidence regarding Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in various clinical contexts for pancreatic cancer including its use as neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), induction therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), salvage therapy for isolated local recurrence (ILR), adjuvant therapy after radical resection, and as a palliative treatment. Special attention is given to the application of magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT).

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the Medline database via PubMed was conducted focusing on prospective studies published within the past decade. Data were extracted concerning study characteristics, outcome measures, toxicity profiles, SBRT dosage and fractionation regimens, as well as additional systemic therapies.

Results and conclusion

31 studies with in total 1,571 patients were included in this review encompassing 14 studies for LAPC, 9 for neoadjuvant treatment, 2 for adjuvant treatment, 2 for ILR, with an additional 4 studies evaluating MRgRT. In LAPC, SBRT demonstrates encouraging results, characterized by favorable local control rates. Several studies even report conversion to resectable disease with substantial resection rates reaching 39%. The adoption of MRgRT may provide a solution to the challenge to deliver ablative doses while minimizing severe toxicities. In BRPC, select prospective studies combining preoperative ablative-dose SBRT with modern induction systemic therapies have achieved remarkable resection rates of up to 80%. MRgRT also holds potential in this context. Adjuvant SBRT does not appear to confer relevant advantages over chemotherapy. While prospective data for SBRT in ILR and for palliative pain relief are limited, they corroborate positive findings from retrospective studies.

Dose-escalated SBRT for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Feasibility, safety and preliminary clinical results of a multicenter study

Background

Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) allows for the administration of a higher biologically effective doses (BED), that would be essential to achieve durable tumor control. Escalating treatment doses need a very accurate tumor positioning and motion control during radiotherapy.The aim of this study to assess the feasibility and safety of a Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) dose-escalated protocol at 45 Gy, 50 Gy and 55 Gy in 5 consecutive daily fractions, in Border Line Resectable Pancreatic Cancer (BRCP) /Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC) by means of a standard LINAC platform.

Methods

Patients diagnosed of BRPC/LAPC, candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT, in four university hospitals of the province of Las Palmas (Canary Islands, Spain) were included in this prospective study. Radiotherapy was administered using standard technology (LINACS) with advanced positioning (Lipiodol® and metallic stent used as fiducial markers) and tumor motion control (4D, DBH, Calypso®). There were 3 planned dose-escalated SIB groups, 45 Gy/5f (9 patients) 50 Gy/5f (9 + 9 patients) and 55 Gy/5f (9 patients). The defined primary end points of the study were the safety and feasibility of the proposed treatment protocol. Secondary endpoints included radiological tumor response after SBRT, local control and survival.

Results

From June 2017 to December 2022, sixty-two patients were initially assessed for eligibility in the study in the four participating centers, and 49 were candidates for chemotherapy (CHT). Forty-one were referred to radiotherapy after CHT and 33 finally were treated by escalated-dose SIB, 45 Gy (9 patients) 50 Gy (16 patients), 55 Gy(8 patients). All patients completed the scheduled treatment and no acute or late severe (≥grade3) gastrointestinal toxicity was observed.Local response was analyzed by CT/MRI two months after the end of SBRT. Ten patients (31,25 %) achieved objective response (2/9:45 Gy, 5/15:50 Gy, 3/8:55 Gy). Follow-up was closed as July 2023. Freedom from local progression at 1-2y were 89,3% (95 %CI:83,4-95,2%) and 66 % (95 %CI:54,6-77,4%) respectively. The 1-2y survival rates were 95,7% (95 %CI:91,4-100 % and 48,6% (95 %CI:37,7-59,5%) respectively.

Conclusion

These promising results should be confirmed by further studies with larger sample size and extended follow-up period.

Stereotactic MR-guided on-table adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A multi-center, open-label phase 2 study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiation dose escalation may improve local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) in select pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of ablative stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC). The primary endpoint of acute grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity definitely related to SMART was previously published with median follow-up (FU) 8.8 months from SMART. We now present more mature outcomes including OS and late toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, multi-center, single-arm open-label phase 2 trial (NCT03621644) enrolled 136 patients (LAPC 56.6 %; BRPC 43.4 %) after ≥ 3 months of any chemotherapy without distant progression and CA19-9 ≤ 500 U/mL. SMART was delivered on a 0.35 T MR-guided system prescribed to 50 Gy in 5 fractions (biologically effective dose10 [BED10] = 100 Gy). Elective coverage was optional. Surgery and chemotherapy were permitted after SMART.

RESULTS

Mean age was 65.7 years (range, 36-85), induction FOLFIRINOX was common (81.7 %), most received elective coverage (57.4 %), and 34.6 % had surgery after SMART. Median FU was 22.9 months from diagnosis and 14.2 months from SMART, respectively. 2-year OS from diagnosis and SMART were 53.6 % and 40.5 %, respectively. Late grade ≥ 3 toxicity definitely, probably, or possibly attributed to SMART were observed in 0 %, 4.6 %, and 11.5 % patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes from the phase 2 SMART trial demonstrate encouraging OS and limited severe toxicity. Additional prospective evaluation of this novel strategy is warranted.

Handling Incomplete or Late-Onset Toxicities in Early-Phase Dose-Finding Clinical Trials: Current Practice and Future Prospects

PURPOSE

The way late-onset toxicities are managed can affect trial outcomes and participant safety. Specifically, participants often might not have completed their entire follow-up period to observe any toxicities before new participants would be recruited. We conducted a methodological review of published early-phase dose-finding clinical trials that used designs accounting for partial and complete toxicity information, aiming to understand (1) how such designs were implemented and reported and (2) if sufficient information was provided to enable the replicability of trial results.

METHODS

Until March 26, 2023, we identified 141 trials using the rolling 6 design, the time-to-event continuous reassessment method (TITE-CRM), the TITE-CRM with cycle information, the TITE Bayesian optimal interval design, the TITE cumulative cohort design, and the rapid enrollment design. Clinical settings, design parameters, practical considerations, and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) information were extracted from these published trials.

RESULTS

The TITE-CRM (61, 43.3%) and the rolling 6 design (76, 53.9%) were most frequently implemented in practice. Trials using the TITE-CRM had longer DLT assessment windows beyond the first cycle compared with the rolling 6 design (52.5% v 6.6%). Most trials implementing the TITE-CRM (91.8%, 56 of 61) failed to describe essential parameters in the protocols or the study result papers. Only five TITE-CRM trials (8.2%, 5 of 61) reported sufficient information to enable replication of the final analysis.

CONCLUSION

When compared with trials using the rolling 6 design, those implementing the TITE-CRM design exhibited notable deficiencies in reporting essential details necessary for reproducibility. Inadequate reporting quality of advanced model-based trial designs hinders their credibility. We provide recommendations that can improve transparency, reproducibility, and accurate interpretation of the results for such designs.

Assessment of interfraction dose variation in pancreas SBRT using daily simulation MR images

Pancreatic Cancer is associated with poor treatment outcomes compared to other cancers. High local control rates have been achieved by using hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to treat pancreatic cancer. Challenges in delivering SBRT include close proximity of several organs at risk (OARs) and target volume inter and intra fraction positional variations. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) guided radiotherapy has shown potential for online adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer, with superior soft tissue contrast compared to CT. The aim of this study was to investigate the variability of target and OAR volumes for different treatment approaches for pancreatic cancer, and to assess the suitability of utilizing a treatment-day MRI for treatment planning purposes. Ten healthy volunteers were scanned on a Siemens Skyra 3 T MRI scanner over two sessions (approximately 3 h apart), per day over 5 days to simulate an SBRT daily simulation scan for treatment planning. A pretreatment scan was also done to simulate patient setup and treatment. A 4D MRI scan was taken at each session for internal target volume (ITV) generation and assessment. For each volunteer a treatment plan was generated in the Raystation treatment planning system (TPS) following departmental protocols on the day one, first session dataset (D1S1), with bulk density overrides applied to enable dose calculation. This treatment plan was propagated through other imaging sessions, and the dose calculated. An additional treatment plan was generated on each first session of each day (S1) to simulate a daily replan process, with this plan propagated to the second session of the day. These accumulated mock treatment doses were assessed against the original treatment plan through DVH comparison of the PTV and OAR volumes. The generated ITV showed large variations when compared to both the first session ITV and daily ITV, with an average magnitude of 22.44% ± 13.28% and 25.83% ± 37.48% respectively. The PTV D95 was reduced by approximately 23.3% for both plan comparisons considered. Surrounding OARs had large variations in dose, with the small bowel V30 increasing by 128.87% when compared to the D1S1 plan, and 43.11% when compared to each daily S1 plan. Daily online adaptive radiotherapy is required for accurate dose delivery for pancreas cancer in the absence of additional motion management and tumour tracking techniques.

A Multi-Institutional Phase 2 Trial of Ablative 5-Fraction Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided On-Table Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance (MR) image guidance may facilitate safe ultrahypofractionated radiation dose escalation for inoperable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We conducted a prospective study evaluating the safety of 5-fraction Stereotactic MR-guided on-table Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for locally advanced (LAPC) and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with LAPC or BRPC were eligible for this multi-institutional, single-arm, phase 2 trial after ≥3 months of systemic therapy without evidence of distant progression. Fifty gray in 5 fractions was prescribed on a 0.35T MR-guided radiation delivery system. The primary endpoint was acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity definitely attributed to SMART.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-six patients (LAPC 56.6%, BRPC 43.4%) were enrolled between January 2019 and January 2022. Mean age was 65.7 (36-85) years. Head of pancreas lesions were most common (66.9%). Induction chemotherapy mostly consisted of (modified)FOLFIRINOX (65.4%) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (16.9%). Mean CA19-9 after induction chemotherapy and before SMART was 71.7 U/mL (0-468). On-table adaptive replanning was performed for 93.1% of all delivered fractions. Median follow-up from diagnosis and SMART was 16.4 and 8.8 months, respectively. The incidence of acute grade ≥3 GI toxicity possibly or probably attributed to SMART was 8.8%, including 2 postoperative deaths that were possibly related to SMART in patients who had surgery. There was no acute grade ≥3 GI toxicity definitely related to SMART. One-year overall survival from SMART was 65.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary endpoint of this study was met with no acute grade ≥3 GI toxicity definitely attributed to ablative 5-fraction SMART. Although it is unclear whether SMART contributed to postoperative toxicity, we recommend caution when pursuing surgery, especially with vascular resection after SMART. Additional follow-up is ongoing to evaluate late toxicity, quality of life, and long-term efficacy.

Portal Vein or Superior Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis with Dose-Escalated Radiation for Borderline or Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

Portal vein and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (PVT/SMVT) are potentially morbid complications of radiation dose-escalated local therapy for pancreatic cancer. We retrospectively reviewed records for patients treated with and without intraoperative radiation (IORT) to identify risk factors for PVT/SMVT.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients with locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical exploration from 2009 to 2014. Patients at risk for close or positive surgical margins received IORT boost to a biologically effective dose (BED10) > 100. Prognostic factors for PVT/SMVT were evaluated using competing risks regression.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 79 months for surviving patients. Fifty-six patients (58%) received IORT. Twenty-nine patients (30%) developed PVT/SMVT at a median time of 18 months. On univariate competing risks regression, operative blood loss and venous repair with a vascular interposition graft, but not IORT dose escalation or diabetes history, were significantly associated with PVT/SMVT. The development of thrombosis in the absence of recurrence was significantly associated with a longstanding diabetes history, post-neoadjuvant treatment CA19-9, and operative blood loss. All 4 patients who underwent both IORT and vascular repair with a graft developed PVT/SMVT. PVT/SMVT in the absence of recurrence is not associated with significantly worsened overall survival but led to frequent medical interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 30% of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation for PDAC developed PVT/SMVT a median of 18 months following surgery. This was significantly associated with venous reconstruction with vascular grafts, but not with escalating radiation dose. PVT/SMVT in the absence of recurrence was associated with significant morbidity.

Predicting the daily gastrointestinal doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer based on the shortest distance between the tumor and the gastrointestinal tract using daily computed tomography images

Objectives

We aimed to investigate whether daily computed tomography (CT) images could predict the daily gastroduodenal, small intestine, and large intestine doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer based on the shortest distance between the gross tumor volume (GTV) and gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

Methods

Twelve patients with pancreatic cancer received SBRT of 40 Gy in five fractions. We recalculated the reference clinical SBRT plan (PLANref) using daily CT images and calculated the shortest distance from the GTV to each GI tract. The maximum dose delivered to 0.5 cc (D0.5cc) was evaluated for each planning at-risk volume of the GI tract. Spearman's correlation test was used to determine the association between the daily change in the shortest distance (Δshortest distance) and the ratio of ΔD0.5cc dose to D0.5cc dose in PLANref (ΔD0.5cc/PLANref) for quantitative analysis.

Results

The median shortest distance in PLANref was 0 mm in the gastroduodenum (interquartile range, 0-2.7), 16.7 mm in the small intestine (10.0-23.7), and 16.7 mm in the large intestine (8.3-28.1 mm). The D0.5cc of PLANref in the gastroduodenum was >30 Gy in all patients, with 10 (83.3%) having the highest dose. A significant association was found between the Δshortest distance and ΔD0.5cc/ PLANref in the small or large intestine (p < 0.001) but not in the gastroduodenum (p = 0.404).

Conclusions

The gastroduodenum had a higher D0.5cc and predicting the daily dose was difficult. Daily dose calculations of the GI tract are recommended for safe SBRT.

Advances in knowledge

This study aimed to predict the daily doses in SBRT for pancreatic cancer from the shortest distance between the GTV and the gastrointestinal tract.Daily changes in the shortest distance can predict the daily dose to the small or large intestines, but not to the gastroduodenum.

Initial clinical experience building a dual CT- and MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy program

Introduction

Our institution was the first in the world to clinically implement MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) in 2014. In 2021, we installed a CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy (CTgART) unit, becoming one of the first clinics in the world to build a dual-modality ART clinic. Herein we review factors that lead to the development of a high-volume dual-modality ART program and treatment census over an initial, one-year period.

Materials and Methods

The clinical adaptive service at our institution is enabled with both MRgART (MRIdian, ViewRay, Inc, Mountain View, CA) and CTgART (ETHOS, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) platforms. We analyzed patient and treatment information including disease sites treated, radiation dose and fractionation, and treatment times for patients on these two platforms. Additionally, we reviewed our institutional workflow for creating, verifying, and implementing a new adaptive workflow on either platform.

Results

From October 2021 to September 2022, 256 patients were treated with adaptive intent at our institution, 186 with MRgART and 70 with CTgART. The majority (106/186) of patients treated with MRgART had pancreatic cancer, and the most common sites treated with CTgART were pelvis (23/70) and abdomen (20/70). 93.0% of treatments on the MRgART platform were stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), whereas only 72.9% of treatments on the CTgART platform were SBRT. Abdominal gated cases were allotted a longer time on the CTgART platform compared to the MRgART platform, whereas pelvic cases were allotted a shorter time on the CTgART platform when compared to the MRgART platform. Our adaptive implementation technique has led to six open clinical trials using MRgART and seven using CTgART.

Conclusions

We demonstrate the successful development of a dual platform ART program in our clinic. Ongoing efforts are needed to continue the development and integration of ART across platforms and disease sites to maximize access and evidence for this technique worldwide.

Impact of planning organ at risk volume margins and matching method on late gastrointestinal toxicity in moderately hypofractionated IMRT for locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study examined the differences in late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities in moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (LA-PDAC) by changing the planning organs at risk volume (PRV) margin and the target matching method and assessed the causes of adverse events.

METHODS

We examined 37 patients with LA-PDAC who underwent moderately hypofractionated IMRT between 2016 and 2020 at our institution; 23 patients were treated with wide PRV margins and soft tissue matching (Protocol A) and 14 with narrow PRV margins and fiducial marker matching (Protocol B). The GI toxicities, local control (LC) rate, and overall survival (OS) were assessed for each protocol. The initially planned and daily doses to the gross tumor volume (GTV), stomach, and duodenum, reproduced from cone-beam computed tomography, were evaluated.

RESULTS

The late GI toxicity rate of grades 3-4 was higher in Protocol B (42.9%) than in Protocol A (4.3%). Although the 2-year LC rates were significantly higher in Protocol B (90.0%) than in Protocol A (33.3%), no significant difference was observed in OS rates. In the initial plan, no deviations were found for the stomach and duodenum from the dose constraints in either protocol. In contrast, daily dose evaluation for the stomach to duodenal bulb revealed that the frequency of deviation of V3 Gy per session was 44.8% in Protocol B, which was significantly higher than the 24.3% in Protocol A.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing PRV margins with fiducial marker matching increased GI toxicities in exchange for improved LC. Daily dose analysis indicated the trade-off between the GTV dose coverage and the irradiated doses to the GI. This study showed that even with strict matching methods, the PRV margin could not be reduced safely because of GI inter-fractional error, which is expected to be resolved with online adaptive radiotherapy.

A simple mathematical model of cyclic hypoxia and its impact on hypofractionated radiotherapy

PURPOSE

There is evidence that the population of cells that experience fluctuating oxygen levels ("acute," or, "cyclic" hypoxia) are more radioresistant than chronically hypoxic ones and hence, this population may determine radiotherapy (RT) response, in particular for hypofractionated RT, where reoxygenation may not be as prominent. A considerable effort has been devoted to examining the impact of hypoxia on hypofractionated RT; however, much less attention has been paid to cyclic hypoxia specifically and the role its kinetics may play in determining the efficacy of these treatments. Here, a simple mathematical model of cyclic hypoxia and fractionation effects was worked out to quantify this.

METHODS

Cancer clonogen survival fraction was estimated using the linear quadratic model, modified to account for oxygen enhancement effects. An analytic approximation for oxygen transport away from a random network of capillaries with fluctuating oxygen levels was used to model inter-fraction tissue oxygen kinetics. The resulting survival fraction formula was used to derive an expression for the iso-survival biologically effective dose (BED), BED_iso-SF . These were computed for some common extra-cranial hypofractionated RT regimens.

RESULTS

Using relevant literature parameter values, inter-fraction fluctuations in oxygenation were found to result in an added 1-2 logs of clonogen survival fraction in going from five fractions to one for the same nominal BED (i.e., excluding the effects of oxygen levels on radiosensitivity). BED_iso-SF 's for most ultra-hypofractionated (five or fewer fractions) regimens in a given tumor site are similar in magnitude, suggesting iso-efficacy for common fractionation schedules.

CONCLUSIONS

Although significant, the loss of cell-killing with increasing hypofractionation is not nearly as large as previous estimates based on the assumption of complete reoxygenation between fractions. Most ultra-hypofractionated regimens currently in place offer sufficiently high doses to counter this loss of cell killing, although care should be taken in implementing single-fraction regimens.

A novel X-Ray and γ-Ray combination strategy for potential dose escalation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has long been calling for advances in technology of radiotherapy. Patients who received radiotherapy still had high risks of local recurrence, while suffering from gastrointestinal side effects. Based on the inherent characteristics of the x-ray and γ-Ray radiation techniques, here we proposed and investigated an unexplored radiation therapy.

PURPOSE

To investigate the potential clinical benefit of a novel x-ray and γ-Ray combination radiation technique in patients with LAPC.

METHODS

Retrospective intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans of 10 LAPC patients were randomly selected to compare with dual-modality plans. The prescribed dose to PGTV was 60.2 Gy. The PGTV dose was further escalated in dual-modality plan while maintaining clinically tolerable dose to organs at risk (OARs). Dosimetric comparisons were made and analyzed for three treatment plans (tomotherapy, standard dual-modality plan, escalated dual-modality plan) to assess the ability to increase dose to target volume while minimizing dose in adjacent OARs. Finally, radiobiological models were utilized for comparison.

RESULTS

All strategies resulted in dosimetrically acceptable plans. Dual-modality plans were present with similar conformity index (CI) and significantly lower gradient index (GI) compared with tomotherapy (3.64 ± 0.37 vs. 4.14 ± 0.61, p = 0.002; 3.64 ± 0.42 vs. 4.14 ± 0.61, p = 0.003). D_mean of PGTV (65.46 ± 3.13 vs. 61.56 ± 1.00, p = 0.009; 77.98 ± 5.86 vs. 61.56 ± 1.00, p < 0.001) and PCTV (55.04 ± 2.14 vs. 53.93 ± 1.67, p = 0.016; 58.24 ± 3.24 vs. 53.93 ± 1.67, p = 0.001) were significantly higher, while D_mean of the stomach was reduced in both dual-modality plans (17.98 ± 10.23 vs. 19.34 ± 9.75, p = 0.024; 17.62 ± 9.92 vs. 19.34 ± 9.75, p = 0.040). The lower V_30Gy in the liver (4.83 ± 5.87 vs. 6.23 ± 6.68, p = 0.015; 4.90 ± 5.93 vs. 6.23 ± 6.68, p = 0.016) and lower V_45Gy of the small intestine (3.35 ± 3.30 vs. 4.06 ± 3.87, p = 0.052) were found in dual-modality plans. Meanwhile, radiobiological models demonstrated higher probability of tumor control (29.27% ± 9.61% vs. 18.34% ± 4.70%, p < 0.001; 44.67% ± 18.16% vs. 18.34% ± 4.70%, p = 0.001) and lower probability of small intestine complication (2.16% ± 2.30% vs. 1.25% ± 2.72%, p = 0.048) in favor of dual-modality strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel dual-modality strategy of x-ray and γ-Ray combination radiation appears reliable for target dose escalation and normal tissue dose reduction. This strategy might be beneficial for local tumor control and the protection of normal organs in patients with LAPC.

Evaluation of short-term gastrointestinal motion and its impact on dosimetric parameters in stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer

Background

The aim of this study is to quantify the short-term motion of the gastrointestinal tract (GI-tract) and its impact on dosimetric parameters in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer.

Methods

The analyzed patients were eleven pancreatic cancer patients treated with SBRT or proton beam therapy. To ensure a fair analysis, the simulation SBRT plan was generated on the planning CT in all patients with the dose prescription of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. The GI-tract motion (stomach, duodenum, small and large intestine) was evaluated using three CT images scanned at spontaneous expiration. After fiducial-based rigid image registration, the contours in each CT image were generated and transferred to the planning CT, then the organ motion was evaluated. Planning at risk volumes (PRV) of each GI-tract were generated by adding 5 mm margins, and the volume receiving at least 33 Gy (V₃₃) < 0.5 cm³ was evaluated as the dose constraint.

Results

The median interval between the first and last CT scans was 736 s (interquartile range, IQR:624-986). To compensate for the GI-tract motion based on the planning CT, the necessary median margin was 8.0 mm (IQR: 8.0-10.0) for the duodenum and 14.0 mm (12.0-16.0) for the small intestine. Compared to the planned V₃₃ with the worst case, the median V₃₃ in the PRV of the duodenum significantly increased from 0.20 cm³ (IQR: 0.02-0.26) to 0.33 cm³ (0.10-0.59) at Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p = 0.031).

Conclusion

The short-term motions of the GI-tract lead to high dose differences.

Potential utility of cone-beam CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy under end-exhalation breath-hold conditions for pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the potential utility of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) under end-exhalation breath-hold (EE-BH) conditions for pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

Eleven PC patients who underwent 15-fraction volumetric-modulated arc therapy under EE-BH conditions were included. Planning CT images and daily 165 CBCT images were imported into a dedicated treatment planning system. The prescription dose was set to 48 Gy in 15 fractions. The reference plan was automatically generated along with predefined clinical goals. After segmentation was completed on CBCT images, two different plans were generated: One was an adapted (ADP) plan in which re-optimization was performed on the anatomy of the day, and the other was a scheduled (SCH) plan, which was the same as the reference plan. The dose distributions calculated using the synthetic CT created from both planning CT and CBCT were compared between the two plans. Independent calculation-based quality assurance was also performed for the ADP plans, with a gamma passing rate of 3%/3 mm.

RESULTS

All clinical goals were successfully achieved during the reference plan generation. Of the 165 sessions, gross tumor volume D_98% and clinical target volume D_98% were higher in 100 (60.1%) and 122 (74.0%) ADP fractions. In each fraction, the V_3 Gy  < 1 cm³ of the stomach and duodenum was violated in 47 (28.5%) and 48 (29.1%), respectively, of the SCH fractions, whereas no violations were observed in the ADP fractions. There were statistically significant differences in the dose-volume indices between the SCH and ADP fractions (p < 0.05). The gamma passing rates were above 95% in all ADP fractions.

CONCLUSIONS

The CBCT-guided online ART under EE-BH conditions successfully reduced the dose to the stomach and duodenum while maintaining target coverage.

Stereotactic ablative radiation for pancreatic cancer on a 1.5 Telsa magnetic resonance-linac system

Purpose

Ablative radiation therapy (A-RT) appears to improve outcomes in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) yet requires solutions for respiratory and digestive motion. We report outcomes of A-RT for pancreatic cancer using 1.5 T MR-adaptive treatment delivery.

Methods

Between March 2020 and July 2021, we treated 30 patients with pancreatic cancer with 50 Gy in 5 fractions (biologically effective dose [BED10] = 100 Gy10) using a novel compression belt workflow and remote planning on the Unity 1.5 T MR linac system. Cumulative incidence of progression was computed from A-RT initiation with death as a competing risk. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan Meier methods.

Results

Of 30 patients, most (73 %) were locally advanced, 4 (13 %) were metastatic, 2 (7 %) were medically inoperable, and 2 (7 %) were locally recurrent. Most (73 %) received FOLFIRINOX prior to A-RT. Median follow-up times from diagnosis and A-RT were 17.6 (IQR 15.8-23.1) and 11.5 months (IQR 9.7-16.1), respectively. Cumulative incidences at 1-year of local and distant progression were 19.3 % (95 %CI 6.7-36.8 %) and 47.4 % (95 %CI 26.7-65.6 %), respectively. Median OS from diagnosis and A-RT were not reached. One-year OS from diagnosis and A-RT were 96.4 % (95 %CI 77.2-99.5 %) and 80.0 % (95 %CI 57.3-91.4 %), respectively. Median and 1-year PFS were 10.1 months (95 %CI 4.4-14.4) and 39.7 % (95 %CI 20.3-58.5 %), respectively. No grade 3 + toxicities were observed.

Conclusions

A-RT using the 1.5 T Unity MR Linac resulted in promising LC and OS with no severe toxicity in patients with LAPC despite radiosensitive organs adjacent to the target volumes. Longer follow-up is needed to assess long-term outcomes.

Simulated computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We conducted a prospective, in silico imaging clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility and potential dosimetric benefits of computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight patients with LAPC received five additional CBCTs on the ETHOS system before or after their standard of care radiotherapy treatment. Initial plans were created based on their initial simulation anatomy (P_I) and emulated adaptive plans were created based on their anatomy-of-the-day (P_A). The prescription was 50 Gy/5 fractions. Plans were created under a strict isotoxicity approach, in which organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints were prioritized over planning target volume coverage. The P_I was evaluated on the patient's anatomy-of-the-day, compared to the daily P_A, and the superior plan was selected. Feasibility was defined as successful completion of the workflow in compliance with strict OAR constraints in ≥80% of fractions.

RESULTS

CT-STAR was feasible in silico for LAPC and improved OAR and/or target dosimetry in 100% of fractions. Use of the P_I based on the patient's anatomy-of-the-day would have yielded a total of 94 OAR constraint violations and ≥1 hard constraint violation in 40/40 fractions. In contrast, 39/40 P_A met all OAR constraints. In one fraction, the P_A minimally exceeded the large bowel constraint, although dosimetrically improved compared to the P_I. Total workflow time per fraction was 36.28 minutes (27.57-55.86).

CONCLUSION

CT-STAR for the treatment of LAPC cancer proved feasible and was dosimetrically superior to non-adapted CT-stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Induction Chemotherapy and Ablative Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Inoperable Pancreas Cancer

Background

Radiation therapy (RT) dose for inoperable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has historically been non-ablative to avoid injuring gastrointestinal (GI) organs at risk (OARs). Accruing data suggest that dose escalation, in select patients, may significantly improve clinical outcomes. Early results of ablative stereotactic magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiation therapy (A-SMART) have been encouraging, although long-term outcomes are not well understood.

Methods

A single institution retrospective analysis was performed of inoperable non-metastatic PDAC patients who received induction chemotherapy then 5-fraction A-SMART on a 0.35T-MR Linac from 2018-2021.

Results

Sixty-two patients were evaluated with a median age of 66 years (range 35-91) and nearly all achieved Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 (96.8%). Locally advanced disease was common (72.6%), otherwise borderline resectable (22.6%), or medically inoperable (4.8%). All received induction chemotherapy for a median 4.2 months (range, 0.2-13.3) most commonly FOLFIRINOX (n=43; 69.4%). Median prescribed dose was 50 Gy (range 40-50); median biologically effective dose (BED₁₀) was 100 Gy₁₀. The median local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) from diagnosis were not reached, 20 months, and 23 months, respectively. Also, 2-year LC, PFS, and OS were 68.8%, 40.0%, and 45.5%, respectively. Acute and late grade 3+ toxicity rates were 4.8% and 4.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the largest series of induction chemotherapy followed by ablative 5-fraction SMART delivered on an MR Linac for inoperable PDAC. The potential for this novel treatment strategy is to achieve long-term LC and OS, compared to chemotherapy alone, and warrants prospective evaluation.

Ablative Radiotherapy (ART) for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC): Toward a New Paradigm?

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) represents a major urgency in oncology. Due to the massive involvement of the peripancreatic vessels, a curative-intent surgery is generally precluded. Historically, LAPC has been an indication for palliative systemic therapy. In recent years, with the introduction of intensive multi-agent chemotherapy regimens and aggressive surgical approaches, the survival of LAPC patients has significantly improved. In this complex and rapidly evolving scenario, the role of radiotherapy is still debated. The use of standard-dose conventional fractionated radiotherapy in LAPC has led to unsatisfactory oncological outcomes. However, technological advances in radiation therapy over recent years have definitively changed this paradigm. The use of ablative doses of radiotherapy, in association with image-guidance, respiratory organ-motion management, and adaptive protocols, has led to unprecedented results in terms of local control and survival. In this overview, principles, clinical applications, and current pitfalls of ablative radiotherapy (ART) as an emerging treatment option for LAPC are discussed.

Phase I study of dose-escalated stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic head cancers: Initial clinical results

Purpose

To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for locally advanced pancreatic head cancers.

Methods

A total of 16 patients were included in the single‐institution phase I dose‐escalation study. The initial dose level was 35 Gy in five fractions, doses were then sequentially escalated to 37.5 Gy, 40 Gy, 42.5 Gy, and 45 Gy. The dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as III/IV GI (gastrointestinal) toxicity.

Results

A total of 16 patients with locally advanced pancreatic head cancers were analyzed, 14 patients had received gemcitabine or S1‐based chemotherapy. Median OS and LPFS were 14.5 months and 12.5 months, respectively; The OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 68.8% and 25%, respectively. No grade 3 or 4 acute or late GI toxicities were observed. Grade 3 toxicities were observed in four patients with three hematologic toxicities and one biliary obstruction for acute toxicities, G1–2 of GI late toxicity were in 31.25% of patients.

Conclusions

SBRT doses ranging from 35 to 45 Gy in five fractions could be given for patients with locally advanced pancreatic head cancers without severe GI toxicities, whereas the side effect of biliary obstruction should be paid more attention.

Trial registration

Clinical trials:NCT02716207.