American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic or Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Local Therapy for Isolated Central Nervous System Progression Among Patients Receiving Antibody-Drug Conjugate Therapy

Purpose

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are an increasingly important class of therapeutics among patients with breast, lung, urothelial, and other malignancies. Guidelines recommend local therapy and continuation of current systemic therapy among patients with isolated brain relapse. We describe the clinical outcomes of this approach among patients receiving ADCs.

Methods and Materials

We queried our institutional database for patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) in the setting of isolated brain progression on ADCs with a plan to continue same-line therapy after radiation. Patients with ≤3 brain metastases at the time of recurrence were categorized as oligoprogressive. Study endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and the cumulative incidence of next therapy from the start of local therapy.

Results

We identified 17 patients receiving ADC therapy with isolated brain progression treated with radiation (stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS]: n = 13, whole brain radiation: n = 4). All patients received concurrent ADC and RT. The median follow-up from local therapy was 29.5 months (95% CI, 21.4-not reached). The median overall survival was 19 months (95% CI, 16-not reached), and the median PFS was 8.1 months (range, 6.7-19 months). One lesion treated with SRS had local failure 21 months after treatment, and the 24-month cumulative incidence of local failure across the entire cohort was 1.6% (95% CI, 0.13%-7.7%). The 6-month cumulative incidence of radiation necrosis was 12% (95% CI, 1.8%-32%). The cumulative incidence of next therapy at 6 and 12 months was 47% (95% CI, 22%-69%) and 71% (95% CI, 41%-87%), respectively, and was significantly lower among patients with oligoprogressive brain recurrence. After SRS, 2 patients were without evidence of disease, discontinued systemic therapy, and were stable on observation at last follow-up.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical report of outcomes using the guideline-recommended approach of local therapy for isolated brain relapse among patients receiving ADCs. Local therapy may delay the need for next line systemic therapy, particularly among patients with oligoprogressive brain relapse.

Oligometastatic NSCLC: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a separate entity with a different biology and prognosis compared to stage IV NSCLC. Challenges range from the very definition of oligometastatic disease to the timing and techniques of local treatments, and their benefit in prolonging patient survival. Most of the international consensus and guidelines agree on the need for shared criteria, such as appropriate stadiation and even tissue biopsy if needed, in order to select patients that could really benefit from personalised strategies. Multidisciplinary evaluation is crucial in order to define if every lesion is amenable to radical local treatment, which appears to be the most important criterion across different guidelines. A distinction must be made depending on the time of oligo-disease detection, separating de novo oligometastatic disease from oligorecurrence, oligoprogression and oligoresidual disease. These separate entities imply a different biology and prognosis, and treatment strategies consequently must be tailored. Locoregional approaches are therefore often contemplated in order to ensure the best outcome for the patient. In non-oncogene-addicted disease, the advent of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) allows physicians to take into consideration consolidative treatments, but timing, technique and subsequent systemic treatment remain open issues. In oncogene-addicted NSCLC, local treatments are nowadays preferably reserved to cases of oligoprogression, but the advent of new, more potent drugs might challenge that. In this review, we summarised the current knowledge, consensuses and data from retrospective and prospective trials, with the aim of shedding some light on the topic and emphasising the unmet clinical need.

Efficacy Analysis of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Tumors: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Metastasis remains a major cause of death among patients with malignant tumors. Radiotherapy is one of the main modalities of cancer treatment. The rapid development of radiotherapy technology has enabled the widespread application of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of HFRT on the survival and safety of patients with oligometastatic tumors.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study that involved 65 patients with well-controlled primary tumors and 1-5 metastatic foci treated at the study site between January 2020 and December 2022. Patients were aged >18 years and had a ≥ 6-month life expectancy. The patients received standard treatments plus HFRT for all metastatic foci. The dose fractionation regimen was adjusted according to the location and size of the patient's metastatic foci. The planning gross tumor volume of HFRT was 82.93 cm3 (range: 10.12-562.80 cm3), and the radiation dose range was 20 Gy/5 F-60 Gy/15 F. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local control rates, and incidence of adverse events of the patients were observed.

RESULTS

Among the 65 patients, the median follow-up time, PFS, and OS were 26 months (95% CI: 0.80-37.50), 15 months (95% CI: 9.36-20.64), and 28 months (95% CI: 16.71-39.29), respectively. The 1- and 2-year PFS were 53.8% and 40.0%, respectively, while the 1- and 2-year OS rates were 73.8% and 56.9%, respectively. In total, 13.8%, 55.4%, 20.0%, and 13.8% of patients showed complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. Four patients developed grade 3 or worse adverse events, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

HFRT showed favorable clinical efficacy and safety in patients with oligometastatic tumors, generally achieving a good OS rate. Further randomized trials should be conducted.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligoprogressive Cancers: Results of the Randomized Phase 2 STOP Trial

PURPOSE

This trial examined if patients with ≤5 sites of oligoprogression benefit from the addition of SABR to standard of care (SOC) systemic therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We enrolled patients with 1 to 5 metastases progressing on systemic therapy, and after stratifying by type of systemic therapy (cytotoxic vs noncytotoxic), randomized 1:2 between continued SOC treatment versus SABR to all progressing lesions plus SOC. The trial was initially limited to non-small cell lung cancer but was expanded to include all nonhematologic malignancies to meet accrual goals. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), lesional control, quality of life, adverse events, and duration of systemic therapy postrandomization.

RESULTS

Ninety patients with 127 oligoprogressive metastases were enrolled across 8 Canadian institutions, with 59 randomized to SABR and 31 to SOC. The median age was 67 years, and 39 (43%) were women. The most common primary sites were lung (44%), genitourinary (23%), and breast (13%). Protocol adherence in the SOC arm was suboptimal, with 11 patients (35%) either receiving high-dose/ablative therapies (conflicting with trial protocol) or withdrawing from the study. The median follow-up was 31 months. There was no difference in PFS between arms (median PFS 8.4 months in the SABR arm vs 4.3 months in the SOC arm, but curves cross and 2-year PFS was 9% vs 24%, respectively; P = .91). The median OS was 31.2 months versus 27.4 months, respectively (P = .22). Lesional control was superior with SABR (70% vs 38%, respectively; P = .0015). There were 2 (3.4%) grade 3 and no grade 4/5 adverse events attributable to SABR.

CONCLUSIONS

SABR was well-tolerated with superior lesional control but did not improve PFS or OS. Accrual to this study was difficult, and the results may have been impacted by an unwillingness to forgo ablative treatments on the SOC arm. (NCT02756793).

The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major cause of mortality in Canada, with many patients presenting with metastatic disease. The oligometastatic state (OM-NSCLC) may be amenable to cure using aggressive local consolidative therapies. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which entails the utilization of a high dose of radiation in one or few fractions, has many benefits in this setting, including its applicability in varied patient populations to ablate lesions in varied anatomical locations. It has also been demonstrated to prolong the time to next-line systemic therapy, to reduce financial burden, to improve quality-adjusted life years, and reduce adverse events caused by these lesions. This review outlines the published phase II and III trials that have already demonstrated the utility of SBRT in OM-NSCLC, as well as the many ongoing trials aiming to further define its role, including the largest phase II/III trial to date, NRG-LU002. Overall, SBRT appears to improve outcomes when combined with a broad range of standard-of-care therapies and is generally well tolerated; however, careful patient selection is necessary to maximize benefits while minimizing harm. Ongoing trials will help define the optimal patients for SBRT and the best timing for this intervention.

Consensus on the lung cancer management after third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance

Lung cancer is the most prevalent malignant tumour in the Asia-Pacific region. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancers. Among these, the rate of EGFR mutations in Asian patients with lung adenocarcinoma is 40-60%. Third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have improved the clinical management of NSCLC with EGFR mutations, but resistance to these drugs remains a significant challenge. Despite numerous ongoing studies, there is no standardized consensus on managing resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs. This consensus integrates international guidelines on EGFR-TKI management, findings from clinical studies, and experiences from the Asia-Pacific region in addressing post-resistance. Detailed recommendations are provided for classification and progression patterns, clinical testing, and post-resistance treatment strategies related to third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance. The aim of these recommendations is to offer reference opinions for the standardized management of patients exhibiting resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs in clinical practice.

Outcomes Analysis of Patients Receiving Local Ablative Therapy for Oligoprogressive Metastatic NSCLC Under First-Line Immunotherapy

CONTEXT

Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) treatment relies on first-line immunotherapy as single agent or combined with chemotherapy. Oligoprogression may be observed in this setting.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We performed a European multicentric retrospective study on patients treated with first-line immunotherapy, who presented with oligoprogressive disease, treated with a local ablative treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients were retrospectively included between 2018 and 2022. Twenty-four patients (39%) received immunotherapy as single agent, and 37 (61%) chemo-immunotherapy. First oligoprogression occurred more frequently in pre-existing metastatic sites (47% of patients). Median PFS1 (defined as time to first oligoprogression) was 11.5 months [IC95%: 10.0-12.3]. We observed that 37 patients (61%) progressed after first oligoprogression, and 20 (54%) from them presented second oligoprogression. Median OS for the whole cohort was 72.0 months [IC95%: 19.3-124.8], with positive correlation between OS and PFS1 (R=0.65, P < .0001). After loco-ablative treatment with radiotherapy, disease control rate was 89% with ablative radiotherapy: 88% with conventional radiotherapy, and 89% with stereotactic radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with oligoprogression under/after immunotherapy have better prognosis with a high risk of subsequent oligoprogression.

Local Ablative Therapy Combined With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Synchronous Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Recursive Partitioning Analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of local ablative therapy (LAT) combined with pembrolizumab in patients with synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify patients who would most benefit from LAT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively identified patients who received diagnosis of synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC (≤5 metastatic lesions and ≤3 organs involved) and were treated with first-line pembrolizumab between January 2017 and December 2022. Patients who underwent LAT, including surgery or radiation therapy at all disease sites, were compared with those who did not undergo LAT. A recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) model was developed using prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Among the 258 patients included, 78 received LAT with pembrolizumab, and 180 received pembrolizumab alone. The median follow-up duration was 15.5 months (range, 3.0-71.2 months). In the entire cohort, LAT was independently associated with significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; P = .015) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.61; P = .020). In the propensity score-matched cohort (N = 74 in each group), the median PFS was 19.9 months and 9.6 months, respectively (P = .003), and the median OS was 42.2 months and 20.5 months, respectively (P = .045), for the LAT and non-LAT groups. Based on the RPA model, incorporating the number of metastatic lesions, performance status, and programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression level, patients were stratified into 3 risk groups with distinct PFS. LAT significantly improved PFS and OS in the low- and intermediate-risk groups; however, no difference was observed in the high-risk group. LAT was more effective as a consolidative treatment after pembrolizumab initiation than as an upfront therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

LAT combined with pembrolizumab was associated with higher PFS and OS compared with pembrolizumab alone in selected patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC. The RPA model could serve as a valuable clinical tool for identifying appropriate patients for LAT.

NRG Oncology and Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group Patterns of Practice Survey and Consensus Recommendations on Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Thoracic Malignancies

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionation using pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy (PBSPT) is an attractive option for thoracic malignancies. Combining the advantages of target coverage conformity and critical organ sparing from both PBSPT and SBRT, this new delivery technique has great potential to improve the therapeutic ratio, particularly for tumors near critical organs. Safe and effective implementation of PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation to treat thoracic malignancies is more challenging than the conventionally fractionated PBSPT because of concerns of amplified uncertainties at the larger dose per fraction. The NRG Oncology and Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Thoracic Subcommittee surveyed proton centers in the United States to identify practice patterns of thoracic PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation. From these patterns, we present recommendations for future technical development of proton SBRT/hypofractionation for thoracic treatment. Among other points, the recommendations highlight the need for volumetric image guidance and multiple computed tomography-based robust optimization and robustness tools to minimize further the effect of uncertainties associated with respiratory motion. Advances in direct motion analysis techniques are urgently needed to supplement current motion management techniques.

Impact of proton PBS machine operating parameters on the effectiveness of layer rescanning for interplay effect mitigation in lung SBRT treatment

BACKGROUND

Rescanning is a common technique used in proton pencil beam scanning to mitigate the interplay effect. Advances in machine operating parameters across different generations of particle therapy systems have led to improvements in beam delivery time (BDT). However, the potential impact of these improvements on the effectiveness of rescanning remains an underexplored area in the existing research.

METHODS

We systematically investigated the impact of proton machine operating parameters on the effectiveness of layer rescanning in mitigating interplay effect during lung SBRT treatment, using the CIRS phantom. Focused on the Hitachi synchrotron particle therapy system, we explored machine operating parameters from our institution's current (2015) and upcoming systems (2025A and 2025B). Accumulated dynamic 4D dose were reconstructed to assess the interplay effect and layer rescanning effectiveness.

RESULTS

Achieving target coverage and dose homogeneity within 2% deviation required 6, 6, and 20 times layer rescanning for the 2015, 2025A, and 2025B machine parameters, respectively. Beyond this point, further increasing the number of layer rescanning did not further improve the dose distribution. BDTs without rescanning were 50.4, 24.4, and 11.4 s for 2015, 2025A, and 2025B, respectively. However, after incorporating proper number of layer rescanning (six for 2015 and 2025A, 20 for 2025B), BDTs increased to 67.0, 39.6, and 42.3 s for 2015, 2025A, and 2025B machine parameters. Our data also demonstrated the potential problem of false negative and false positive if the randomness of the respiratory phase at which the beam is initiated is not considered in the evaluation of interplay effect.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of layer rescanning for mitigating interplay effect is affected by machine operating parameters. Therefore, past clinical experiences may not be applicable to modern machines.

Complex situations in lung cancer: multifocal disease, oligoprogression and oligorecurrence

With the emergence of lung cancer screening programmes and newly detected localised and multifocal disease, novel treatment compounds and multimodal treatment approaches, the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer is becoming increasingly complex. In parallel, in-depth molecular analyses and clonality studies are revealing more information about tumorigenesis, potential therapeutical targets and the origin of lesions. All can play an important role in cases with multifocal disease, oligoprogression and oligorecurrence. In multifocal disease, it is essential to understand the relatedness of separate lesions for treatment decisions, because this information distinguishes separate early-stage tumours from locally advanced or metastatic cancer. Clonality studies suggest that a majority of same-histology lesions represent multiple primary tumours. With the current standard of systemic treatment, oligoprogression after an initial treatment response is a common scenario. In this state of induced oligoprogressive disease, local ablative therapy by either surgery or radiotherapy is becoming increasingly important. Another scenario involves the emergence of a limited number of metastases after radical treatment of the primary tumour, referred to as oligorecurrence, for which the use of local ablative therapy holds promise in improving survival. Our review addresses these complex situations in lung cancer by discussing current evidence, knowledge gaps and treatment recommendations.

Solid tumours showing oligoprogression to immune checkpoint inhibitors have the potential for abscopal effects

PURPOSE

Given the uncertainty surrounding the abscopal effect (AE), it is imperative to identify promising treatment targets. In this study, we aimed to explore the incidence of AE when administering radiotherapy to patients with oligoprogressive solid tumours while they are undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicentre prospective observational study, oligoprogressive disease was defined as a < 20% increase in lesions compared to > 2 months before enrolment. We enrolled patients who requested radiotherapy during the ICI rest period between 2020 and 2023. AE was considered present if ≥ 1 non-irradiated lesion decreased by ≥ 30% before the next line of systemic therapy started.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included in this study; the common primary lesions were in the lungs (four patients) and kidneys (three patients). AEs were observed in six (50%) patients, with a median time to onset of 4 (range 2-9) months after radiotherapy. No significant predictors of AEs were identified. Patients in the AE group had a significantly better 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate than those in the non-AE group (p = 0.008). Two patients from the AE group were untreated and progression-free at the last follow-up. Four (33%) patients experienced grade 2 toxicity, with two cases attributed to radiotherapy and the other two to ICI treatment. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed in any category.

CONCLUSION

Patients with oligoprogressive disease may be promising targets with potential for AEs. AEs can lead to improved PFS and, in rare cases, to a certain progression-free period without treatment. Irradiating solid tumours in patients with oligoprogressive disease during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy may be a promising target with the potential for abscopal effects (AEs). AEs can lead to improved progression-free survival and, in rare cases, to a certain progression-free period without treatment.

Metastases-directed local therapies (MDT) beyond genuine oligometastatic disease (OMD): Indications, endpoints and the role of imaging

To further personalise treatment in metastatic cancer, the indications for metastases-directed local therapy (MDT) and the biology of oligometastatic disease (OMD) should be kept conceptually apart. Both need to be vigorously investigated. Tumour growth dynamics - growth rate combined with metastatic seeding efficiency - is the single most important biological feature determining the likelihood of success of MDT in an individual patient, which might even be beneficial in slowly developing polymetastatic disease. This can be reasonably well assessed using appropriate clinical imaging. In the context of considering appropriate indications for MDT, detecting metastases at the edge of image resolution should therefore suggest postponing MDT. While three to five lesions are typically used to define OMD, it could be argued that countability throughout the course of metastatic disease, rather than a specific maximum number of lesions, could serve as a better parameter for guiding MDT. Here we argue that the unit of MDT as a treatment option in metastatic cancer might best be defined not as a single procedure at a single point in time, but as a series of treatments that can be delivered in a single or multiple sessions to different lesions over time. Newly emerging lesions that remain amenable to MDT without triggering the start of a new systemic treatment, a change in systemic therapy, or initiation of best supportive care, would thus not constitute a failure of MDT. This would have implications for defining endpoints in clinical trials and registries: Rather than with any disease progression, failure of MDT would only be declared when there is progression to polymetastatic disease, which then precludes further options for MDT.

Exosomes: a promising avenue for cancer diagnosis beyond treatment

Exosomes, extracellular vesicles secreted by cells, have garnered significant attention in recent years for their remarkable therapeutic potential. These nanoscale carriers can be harnessed for the targeted delivery of therapeutic agents, such as pharmaceuticals, proteins, and nucleic acids, across biological barriers. This versatile attribute of exosomes is a promising modality for precision medicine applications, notably in the realm of cancer therapy. However, despite their substantial therapeutic potential, exosomes still confront challenges tied to standardization and scalability that impede their practice in clinical applications. Moreover, heterogeneity in isolation methodologies and limited cargo loading mechanisms pose obstacles to ensuring consistent outcomes, thereby constraining their therapeutic utility. In contrast, exosomes exhibit a distinct advantage in cancer diagnosis, as they harbor specific signatures reflective of the tumor's genetic and proteomic profile. This characteristic endows them with the potential to serve as valuable liquid biopsies for non-invasive and real-time monitoring, making possible early cancer detection for the development of personalized treatment strategies. In this review, we provide an extensive evaluation of the advancements in exosome research, critically examining their advantages and limitations in the context of cancer therapy and early diagnosis. Furthermore, we present a curated overview of the most recent technological innovations utilizing exosomes, with a focus on enhancing the efficacy of early cancer detection.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive and Oligorecurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in oligoprogressive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. We evaluated whether SBRT in a subset of patients with oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent NSCLC offers a durable response, obviating the need to change systemic therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 168 NSCLC patients who underwent SBRT for oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent disease was performed. Oligoprogression was defined as progression in ≤5 lesions during or after systemic therapy following an initial complete or partial response. Oligorecurrence was defined as progression while off systemic therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment or death (TNT-D) were estimated.

RESULTS

Median age was 68 years. Sixty-seven percent of patients were on systemic therapy at the time of progression. Progression at the primary site was present in 31% of the patients. The number of sites of metastatic progression was 0 to 2 in 76% and 3 to 5 in 24% of the patients. Two-year OS and PFS were 56% (95%CI 46%-64%) and 14% (95%CI 8%-21%), respectively. Median TNT-D was 9 months (95%CI 6-11). No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was seen. In multivariable analysis, patients with 3 to 5 sites of metastatic progression had worse OS (HR 2.6, 95%CI 1.5-4.3, P < .001) and shorter TNT-D (HR 1.7, 95%CI 1.1-2.5, P = .01) than those with 0 to 2 sites.

CONCLUSION

SBRT is a safe and viable treatment option for oligoprogressive and oligorecurrent NSCLC. Patients with 0 to 2 sites had better OS and longer TNT-D compared to those with 3 to 5 lesions.

Radiotherapy for Lung Metastases: Conventional to Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

The lung parenchyma and adjacent tissues are one of the most common sites of metastatic disease. Traditionally, the approach to treatment of a patient with lung metastases has been with systemic therapy, with radiotherapy being reserved for palliative management of symptomatic disease. The concept of oligo metastatic disease has paved the way for more radical treatment options, administered either alone or as local consolidative therapy in addition to systemic treatment. The modern-day management of lung metastases is guided by a number of factors, including the number of lung metastases, extra-thoracic disease status, overall performance status, and life expectancy, which all help determine the goals of care. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a safe and effective method in locally controlling lung metastases, in the oligo metastatic or oligo-recurrent setting. This article outlines the role of radiotherapy in multimodality management of lung metastases.

Benchmarking Outcomes for Molecularly Characterized Synchronous Oligometastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Reveals EGFR Mutations to Be Associated With Longer Overall Survival

PURPOSE

Local consolidative therapy (LCT) for patients with synchronous oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer is an evolving treatment strategy, but outcomes following LCT stratified by genetic mutations have not been reported. We sought to identify genomic associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for these patients.

METHODS

We identified all patients presenting between 2000 and 2017 with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer and ≤ 3 synchronous metastatic sites. Patients were grouped according to mutational statuses. Primary outcomes included OS and PFS following initial diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of 194 included patients, 121 received comprehensive LCT to all sites of disease with either surgery or radiation. TP53 mutations were identified in 40 of 78 (55%), KRAS in 32 of 95 (34%), EGFR in 24 of 109 (22%), and STK11 in nine of 77 (12%). At median follow-up of 96 months, median OS and PFS were 26 (95% CI, 23 to 31) months and 11 (95% CI, 9 to 13) months, respectively. On multivariable analysis, patients with EGFR mutations had lower mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.98; P = .044) compared with wild-type patients, and patients with STK11 mutations had higher risk of progression or mortality (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.79; P = .023) compared with wild-type patients. TP53 and KRAS mutations were not associated with OS or PFS. Among 71 patients with known EGFR mutational status who received comprehensive LCT, EGFR mutations were associated with lower mortality compared with wild-type (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.94; P = .032).

CONCLUSION

When compared with wild-type patients, those with EGFR and STK11 mutations had longer OS and shorter PFS, respectively. EGFR mutations were associated with longer OS among oligometastatic patients treated with comprehensive LCT in addition to systemic therapy.

Local therapy treatment conditions for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Standard treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) include palliative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but with limited survival rates. With the development of improved immunotherapy and targeted therapy, NSCLC prognoses have significantly improved. In recent years, the concept of oligometastatic disease has been developed, with randomized trial data showing survival benefits from local ablation therapy (LAT) in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC (OM-NSCLC). LAT includes surgery, stereotactic ablation body radiation therapy, or thermal ablation, and is becoming an important treatment component for OM-NSCLC. However, controversy remains on specific management strategies for the condition. In this review, we gathered current randomized trial data to analyze prognostic factors affecting patient survival, and explored ideal treatment conditions for patients with OM-NSCLC with respect to long-term survival.

Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Practical Review of Prospective Trials

Simple Summary

A significant number of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will have a metastatic Stage IV disease at presentation. Among those, patients with limited number of metastases are referred to as oligometastatic, and their treatment will combine systemic and possible local therapy. The aim of this article is to review the current definition of oligometastatic cancer, a historic perspective of lung cancer leading to modern oligometastatic disease and to present available prospective evidence for treatment of oligometastatic NSCLC. We describe trials exploring role of local therapy in oligometastatic NSCLC with actionable mutation in combination with TKI or without any actionable mutation and in combination with chemo-immunotherapy. We also discuss general treatment approaches adopted based on limited data. Finally, we discuss the on-going clinical trials for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive NSCLC.

Abstract

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an intermediate state between localized and widely metastatic NSCLC, where systemic therapy in combination with aggressive local therapy when feasible can yield a favorable outcome. While different societies have adopted different definitions for oligometastatic NSCLC, the feasibility of curative intent treatment remains a major determinant of the oligometastatic state. The management involves a multidisciplinary approach to identify such patients with oligometastatic stage, including the presence of symptomatic or potentially symptomatic brain metastasis, the presence of targetable mutations, and programmed death-ligand (PD-L1) expression. Treatment requires a personalized approach with the use of novel systemic agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy, and addition of local ablative therapy via surgery or stereotactic radiation therapy when appropriate.

Local Therapy for Oligoprogressive Disease: A Systematic Review of Prospective Trials

OBJECTIVES

The successes of local therapy for oligometastatic cancers cannot be extrapolated to oligoprogressive disease (OPD) because they are distinct clinical entities. Given the limited prospective data on OPD to date, summative analyses are urgently needed.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria for this PRISMA-guided systematic review were as follows. First, only prospective data were included. Second, progression had to have occurred on active/ongoing systemic therapy. Third, the number of progressing areas of disease had to be explicitly listed and ≤5 in number. Fourth, all progressing sites had to undergo local therapy (radiotherapy/surgery/non-radiation ablative procedures).

RESULTS

Eight trials met criteria (summing 290 patients), the vast majority of which utilized stereotactic radiotherapy as the local modality (most commonly, 19-20 Gy in 1 fraction, 27-33 Gy in 3 fractions, or 35-50 Gy in 5 fractions). A study on NSCLC demonstrated that stereotactic radiotherapy improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to historical values with systemic therapy alone. Two additional studies on EGFR-mutated NSCLC also showed acceptable PFS with local therapy, particularly in patients who oligoprogressed on osimertinib. The only randomized trial analyzed herein showed that local therapy improved PFS for NSCLC but not breast cancer. Two trials in castration-resistant prostate cancer illustrated that a substantial proportion of patients did not require any changes in hormonal therapy and/or delayed the need to change systemic therapies. Lastly, two trials of renal cell carcinoma showed high (90-100%) local control and median PFS of 9 months, and potentially a prolonged time to change systemic therapy. Lastly, from all patients in all trials, local therapy was tolerated well, with only 7 instances of grade 3+ toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the limited data, local therapy for OPD is safe and yields encouraging short-term preliminary outcomes, but trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are required for more robust conclusions.

A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Cancer Oligometastases

PURPOSE

It is crucial to economically justify the use of promising therapies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastatic disease (OMD). The goal of this systematic review was to summatively evaluate publications that analyzed the cost-effectiveness of SABR for OMD.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using PRISMA-guided methodology, PubMed and EMBASE were searched for modeling-based cost effectiveness (CE) studies for various forms of limited metastatic disease. Only full publications that specifically compared SABR with a systemic therapy-based approach were included.

RESULTS

Of 9 studies, 4 pertained to OMD with mixed histologies, 2 to oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer, 1 to pulmonary OMD, 1 to liver OMD, and 1 to low-volume oligorecurrent castration-sensitive prostate cancer. All but one investigation illustrated that SABR was cost-effective for the studied population (or a subpopulation); of these studies, the incremental CE ratios (ICERs) for SABR (when reported) ranged from $28,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) to $55,000/QALY. Of studies that reported the probability of SABR being cost-effective at common willingness-to-pay values, the median (range) probability of achieving CE was roughly 61% (30-88%) at a $50,000/QALY threshold and 78% (31%-100%) at a $100,000/QALY threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence suggests that SABR is a cost-effective approach for OMD, which has implications for value-based oncologic practice and construction of future health policies. However, re-assessment is required in the context of modern systemic therapies (e.g. immunotherapy) as well as long-term follow-up of existing and newly reported randomized trials. Prudent patient selection remains the single most important factor influencing the CE of SABR for OMD.

Optimize Local Therapy for Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer to Enhance Survival

Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is highly heterogeneous, and there are patients with limited areas of metastases (oligometastases) or progression (oligoprogression) whose natural history and prognosis can be considerably more favorable. As a result, local therapy may offer these patients a chance at clinically meaningful disease control and/or cure. This review begins by describing the current status of the existing prospective data, including evidence of overall survival improvements from multiple randomized trials. Given the nascence of this realm, the review then examines ongoing controversies and unresolved issues regarding local therapy for oligometastatic and oligoprogression. First, the role of local therapy in the setting of targeted therapies and immunotherapy is discussed, because most published randomized trials of local therapy have been performed in the context of chemotherapy, which is no longer the standard of care for most patients with metastatic NSCLC. Refining patient selection for local therapy is then reviewed, including clinical factors (such as control of the primary and regional lymph node sites, the heterogeneous definitions of oligometastases/oligoprogression, and the underrepresentation of brain metastases in existing randomized data) and novel pathologic/molecular biomarkers. Next, because there also remains no consensus regarding the optimal modality of local therapy, the advantages and disadvantages of stereotactic radiotherapy, surgery, and other ablative techniques are discussed. Subsequently, methods to optimize radiotherapy are examined, including controversies regarding the optimal dose/fractionation and timing/sequencing scheme. A discussion regarding potentially extending the existing data to polymetastatic NSCLC follows. The review concludes with remarks regarding prudently designing randomized trials of local therapy going forward, including the benefits and drawbacks of specific endpoints meriting further testing in this unique population.

Managing stage 4 ameloblastoma with dual BRAF/MEK inhibition: A case report with 8-year clinical follow-up

We present 8-year follow-up on the first patient with stage 4 ameloblastoma carrying a BRAF V600E mutation treated with dual BRAF/MEK inhibition (BRAF/MEKi). He experienced a durable clinical response while on dabrafenib (BRAFi) and trametinib (MEKi) without toxicity nor evidence for drug-resistant tumor progression. He was asymptomatic when he self-discontinued therapy after 4 years of sustained clinical response. He did not return for follow-up until 2.5 years later with onset of painful mandibular tumor recurrence associated with recurrent bilateral lung metastases. He was rechallenged with dabrafenib/trametinib and experienced another prompt tumor response and remains in a second durable clinical remission (currently > 16 months) on continuous dual targeted therapy. We discuss the implications of this case study for future treatment strategies.

Role of Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Non-Oncogene Addicted NSCLC

Local ablative therapy (LAT), intended as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery, is a well-recognized effective treatment for selected patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. Current clinical evidence supports LAT alone or in combination with systemic therapies. Our retrospective mono-institutional study aims to assess the role of LAT with a peculiar focus on the largest series of non-oncogene addicted oligometastatic NSCLC patients to date. We included in this analysis all patients with the mentioned disease characteristics who underwent LAT for intracranial and/or extracranial metastases between 2011 and 2020. The main endpoints were local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the whole population and after stratification for prognostic factors. We identified a series of 245 consecutive patients (314 lesions), included in this analysis (median age 69 years). In 77% of patients, a single metastasis was treated with LAT and intracranial involvement was the most frequent indication (53% of patients) in our series. The overall response rate (ORR) after LAT was 95%. In case of disease progression, 66 patients underwent new local treatments with curative intent. With a median follow-up of 18 months, median PFS was 13 months (1-year PFS 50%) and median OS was 32 months (1-year OS 75%). The median LC was not reached (1-year LC 89%). The presence of brain metastases was the only factor that negatively affected all clinical endpoints, with a 1-year LC, PFS and OS of 82%, 29% and 62% respectively, compared to 95%, 73% and 91%, respectively, for patients without BMs (p < 0.001 for each endpoint). At the multivariate analysis, mediastinal nodal involvement at baseline (p = 0.049), ECOG PS = 1 (p = 0.011), intracranial disease involvement (p = 0.001), administration of chemotherapy in combination with LAT (p = 0.020), and no delivery of further local treatment for progression or delivery of focal treatment for intracranial progression (p < 0.001) were related to a poorer OS. In our retrospective series, which is to our knowledge the largest to date, LAT showed encouraging results and confirmed the safety and effectiveness of focal treatments in non-oncogene addicted oligometastatic NSCLC patients.

Management of oligoprogression in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Oligoprogression is an emerging concept in oncology representing a state where after an initially successfully local or systemic treatment a disease progression occurs characterized by the appearance of a single or few new lesions. We reviewed the literature and explained the rationale of the therapeutic choices by referring to the current guidelines and literature data. In any case, the treatment of oligometastatic disease should be tailored to suit the individual patient with the aim of maximizing the benefit of each line of therapy.

Patient Selection for Local Aggressive Treatment in Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Since the first introduction of the oligometastatic state with a low burden of metastases in non-small cell lung cancer, accumulating evidence from retrospective and prospective studies has shown that a local aggressive, multimodality treatment may significantly improve the prognosis in these patients. Local aggressive treatment includes a systemic therapy of micrometastatic disease, as well as a radical resection of the primary tumor and surgical resection and/or radiation therapy of distant metastases. However, patient selection and treatment allocation remain a central challenge in oligometastatic disease. In this review, we aimed to address the current evidence on criteria for patient selection for local aggressive treatment in non-small cell lung cancer.

Abstract

One-fourth of all patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer presents with a limited number of metastases and relatively low systemic tumor burden. This oligometastatic state with limited systemic tumor burden may be associated with remarkably improved overall and progression-free survival if both primary tumor and metastases are treated radically combined with systemic therapy. This local aggressive therapy (LAT) requires a multidisciplinary approach including medical oncologists, radiation therapists, and thoracic surgeons. A surgical resection of the often advanced primary tumor should be part of the radical treatment whenever feasible. However, patient selection, timing, and a correct treatment allocation for LAT appear to be essential. In this review, we aimed to summarize and discuss the current evidence on patient selection criteria such as characteristics of the primary tumor and metastases, response to neoadjuvant or first-line treatment, molecular characteristics, mediastinal lymph node involvement, and other factors for LAT in oligometastatic NSCLC.