Identifying Psychosocial Needs of Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Radiation Therapy in an Inner-City Academic Center to Address Racial Disparities

A Qualitative Study of the Pain Experience of Black Individuals With Cancer Taking Long-Acting Opioids

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the experience of Black individuals with cancer taking long-acting opioids for cancer pain.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the day-to-day experience of living with pain and the experiences of taking opioids for pain management among Black individuals with cancer prescribed with long-acting opioids.

METHODS

This qualitative descriptive study was part of a larger investigation focused on opioid adherence. Participants (N = 14) were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide. Analysis followed conventional content analysis and constant comparison approaches. Sociodemographics, clinical information, and the Brief Pain Inventory form were collected.

RESULTS

The majority of the subsample was female (64.3%), not married (78.6%), and with a median age of 52.5 years. Participants were taking either MS Contin (85.7%) or OxyContin (14.3%). The Brief Pain Inventory median "average" pain severity scores and pain interference scores were 5.1/10 (interquartile range [IQR] = 6.1) and 3.5/10 (IQR = 6.7), respectively. Three themes are reported from the analyses: desire for control, barriers to pain relief, and isolation versus connectedness.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the persistent nature of moderate to severe cancer pain and how pain and its treatment interfere with patients' lives. The findings describe ways that patients learn to manage and exert control over pain despite conflicting attitudes and dealing with opioid stigma.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Clinicians should partner with patients with cancer, especially people of color, who may experience intersecting stigmas related to their cancer pain and opioid use, to best provide an individualized and culturally sensitive pain treatment plan.

Insurance Authorization and Access to Proton Therapy for Patients With Head and Neck Cancers

PURPOSE

We evaluated our institutional experience to assess potential racial inequities in insurance coverage for proton therapy in patients with head and neck (HN) cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We examined the demographics of 1519 patients with HN cancer seen in consultation at our HN multidisciplinary clinic (HN MDC) and 805 patients for whom a proton insurance authorization was sought (PAS) from January 2020 to June 2022. The prospects for proton therapy insurance authorization were prospectively noted based on each patient's ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision) diagnosis code and their specific insurance plan. Proton-unfavorable (PU) insurance were those plans whose policy describes proton beam therapy as "experimental" or "not medically necessary" for the given diagnosis.

RESULTS

For patients seen in our HN MDC, Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) were significantly more likely to have PU insurance than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (24.9% vs 18.4%, P = .005). In multivariable analysis including race, average income of residence ZIP code, and Medicare eligibility age, BIPOC patients had an odds ratio of 1.25 for PU insurance (P = .041). In the PAS cohort, while there was no difference in the percentage of patients receiving insurance approval for proton therapy between NHW and BIPOC populations (88% vs 88.2%, P = .80), for patients with PU insurance, the median time to determination was significantly longer (median, 15.5 days), and the median time to start any radiation of any modality was longer (46 vs 35 days, P = .08). Compared with NHW patients, the median time from consultation to start of radiation therapy was longer for BIPOC patients (37 vs 43 days, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

BIPOC patients were significantly more likely to have insurance plans unfavorable to proton therapy coverage. These PU insurance plans were associated with a longer median time to determination, a lower approval rate for proton therapy, and a longer time to start radiation of any modality.

The Effect of Body Mass Index and Residence in Food Priority Areas on Patterns-of-Care and Cancer Outcomes in Patients With Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Patients living in food priority areas (FPAs), where access to healthy meals is challenging, may be at greater risk of nutritional deficits, leading to poorer cancer outcomes. Currently, there are no published data analyzing how FPAs affect patterns-of-care or outcomes for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to analyze the effect of residing in an FPA on treatments rendered and cancer outcomes in patients with stage III NSCLC treated at a single institution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a retrospective study of 573 patients with locally advanced NSCLC consecutively treated from January 2000 to January 2020. χ² and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to determine differences between select variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and freedom from recurrence. Cox regression with forward model selection was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-two percent of patients resided in an FPA (n = 183) and were more likely to self-identify as Black (P < .0001), single (P < .001), <60 years of age (P = .001), and uninsured (P < .0001), with a lower median income (P < .001). Patients in FPAs also had lower mean pre-chemoradiation (CRT) albumin (P = .002), lower pre-CRT body mass index (BMI) (P = .026), and were less likely to receive trimodality therapy (P ≤ .001) compared with patients not living in FPAs. There was no difference in OS or freedom from recurrence between the 2 cohorts. However, in patients with a normal BMI, either pre-CRT (median OS, 18.4 vs 25.0 months; P = .005) or after CRT (15.1 vs 28.1 months, P = .002), residing in an FPA resulted in an OS detriment.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated a clear socioeconomic divide in our patient population with stage III NSCLC, where residing in FPAs was associated with less-aggressive therapy and an OS detriment for patients with a normal-weight BMI. We are currently conducting a prospective study characterizing the nutritional needs of patients, particularly those who live in FPAs.