Neoadjuvant Osimertinib Followed by Sequential Definitive Radiation Therapy and/or Surgery in Stage III Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Study

Consolidation Osimertinib Versus Durvalumab Versus Observation After Concurrent Chemoradiation in Unresectable EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Durvalumab improves survival when used as consolidation therapy after chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with stage III NSCLC. The optimal consolidation therapy for patients with EGFR-mutant (EGFRmut) stage III NSCLC remains unknown.

METHODS

In this multi-institutional, international retrospective analysis across 24 institutions, we evaluated outcomes in patients with stage III EGFRmut NSCLC treated with concurrent CRT followed by consolidation therapy with osimertinib, durvalumab, or observation between 2015 and 2022. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS, primary end point) and overall survival (secondary end point). Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) during consolidation treatment were defined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used.

RESULTS

Of 136 patients with stage III EGFRmut NSCLC treated with definitive concurrent CRT, 56 received consolidation durvalumab, 33 received consolidation osimertinib, and 47 was on observation alone. Baseline characteristics were similar across the three cohorts. With a median follow-up of 46 months for the entire cohort, the median duration of treatment was not reached (NR) for osimertinib (interquartile range: NR-NR) and was 5.5 (interquartile range: 2.4-10.8) months with durvalumab. After adjusting for nodal status, stage III A/B/C, and age, patients treated with consolidation osimertinib had significantly longer 24-month rwPFS compared to those treated with durvalumab or in the observation cohorts (osimertinib: 86%, durvalumab: 30%, observation: 27%, p < 0.001 for both comparisons). There was no difference in rwPFS between the durvalumab and the observation cohorts. No significant difference in overall survival across the three cohorts was detected, likely due to the limited follow-up. Any-grade trAE occurred in 52% (2 [6.1%] grade ≥3) and 48% (10 [18%] grade ≥3) of patients treated with osimertinib and durvalumab, respectively. Of 45 patients who progressed on consolidation durvalumab, 37 (82%) subsequently received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Of these, 14 (38%) patients developed trAEs including five patients with pneumonitis (14%; 2 [5.4%] grade ≥3) and five patients with diarrhea (14%; 1 [2.7%] grade ≥3).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that among patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC with a sensitizing EGFR mutation, consolidation osimertinib was associated with a significantly longer rwPFS compared to durvalumab or observation. No unanticipated safety signals were observed with consolidation osimertinib.

The ASCENT Trial: a phase 2 study of induction and consolidation afatinib and chemoradiation with or without surgery in stage III EGFR-mutant NSCLC

BACKGROUND

The role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in early-stage and metastatic oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is established, but it remains unknown how best to integrate TKIs with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in locally advanced disease. The phase 2 ASCENT trial assessed the efficacy and safety of afatinib and cCRT with or without surgery in locally advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults ≥18 years with histologically confirmed stage III (AJCC 7th edition) NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations were enrolled at Mass General and Dana-Farber/Brigham Cancer Centers, Boston, Massachusetts. Patients received induction afatinib 40 mg daily for 2 months, then cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks during RT (definitive or neoadjuvant dosing). Patients with resectable disease underwent surgery. All patients were offered consolidation afatinib for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) to induction TKI. Secondary endpoints were safety, conversion to operability, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Analyses were performed on the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (median age 56 years; 74% female) were enrolled. ORR to induction afatinib was 63%. Seventeen patients received cCRT; 2/9 previously unresectable became resectable. Ten underwent surgery; 6 had a major or complete pathological response. Thirteen received consolidation afatinib. With a median follow-up of 5.0 years, median PFS and OS were 2.6 (95% CI, 1.4-3.1) and 5.8 years (2.9-NR), respectively. Sixteen recurred or died; 6 recurrences were isolated to CNS. The median time to progression after stopping consolidation TKI was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.1-7.2). Four developed grade 2 pneumonitis. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

We explored the efficacy of combining TKI with cCRT in oncogene-driven NSCLC. Induction TKI did not compromise subsequent receipt of multimodality therapy. PFS was promising, but the prevalence of CNS-only recurrences and rapid progression after TKI discontinuation speak to unmet needs in measuring and eradicating micrometastatic disease.

Feasibility and safety of EGFR-TKI neoadjuvant therapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of neoadjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeted therapy for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. Previous studies have shown that EGFR-TKIs have excellent anti-tumor activity. However, almost all studies on neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC have been non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes and different methods of statistical analysis, which may lead to a lack of valid metrics to assess the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Results including objective response rate (ORR), complete resection rate (R0), downstaging rate, pathological complete response (PCR), major pathological response (MPR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were used for further analysis.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis ultimately included 11 studies involving 344 patients with EGFR-positive mutations in NSCLC. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR was 57% (95% CI: 42%-73%), and in the Osimertinib subgroup, the pooled ORR was 80% (95% CI: 63%-98%). Analysis of studies that reported a downstaging rate showed the pooled downstaging rate of 41% (95% CI: 9%-74%) and the pooled downstaging rate of 74% (95% CI: 22%-100%) in the Osimertinib subgroup. In terms of surgical outcomes, the pooled pCR rate was 3% (95% CI: 0%-7%), the pooled MPR rate was 11% (95% CI: 6%-17%), and the pooled R0 resection rate was 91% (95% CI: 85%-95%). The most common adverse events associated with neoadjuvant therapy were rash and diarrhea. The pooled incidence of any grade of rash was 47.1% (95% CI: 25.4%-69.3%), and the pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 rash was 0.6% (95% CI: 0.0%-2.5%). The pooled incidence of diarrhea of any grade was 28.8% (95% CI: 14.4%-45.4%), with the pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea of 0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.6%). The pooled incidence of ≥ grade 3 adverse events was significantly lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKIs for the treatment of NSCLC patients with EGFR-positive mutations and that third-generation EGFR-TKIs were superior to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs in terms of shrinking tumor volume and lowering tumor stage; however, future large-scale and multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023466731.

Liquid biopsy for the management of NSCLC patients under osimertinib treatment

Therapeutic management of NSCLC patients is quite challenging as they are mainly diagnosed at a late stage of disease, and they present a high heterogeneous molecular profile. Osimertinib changed the paradigm shift in treatment of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients achieving significantly better clinical outcomes. To date, osimertinib is successfully administered not only as first- or second-line treatment, but also as adjuvant treatment while its efficacy is currently investigated during neoadjuvant treatment or in stage III, unresectable EGFR mutant NSCLC patients. However, resistance to osimertinib may occur due to clonal evolution, under the pressure of the targeted therapy. The utilization of liquid biopsy as a minimally invasive tool provides insight into molecular heterogeneity of tumor clonal evolution and potent resistance mechanisms which may help to develop more suitable therapeutic approaches. Longitudinal monitoring of NSCLC patients through ctDNA or CTC analysis could reveal valuable information about clinical outcomes during osimertinib treatment. Therefore, several guidelines suggest that liquid biopsy in addition to tissue biopsy should be considered as a standard of care in the advanced NSCLC setting. This practice could significantly increase the number of NSCLC patients that will eventually benefit from targeted therapies, such as EGFR TKIs.