1
|
Nicholson JT, Cleary S, Farmer G, Monaghan O, O’ Driscoll H, Nugent K, Khosravi B, Quinlan E, McArdle O, Duane FK. Ultrahypofractionated Adjuvant Breast Radiation Therapy (± Boost) and Virtual Consultations: Patient Perspectives at 1 Year. Adv Radiat Oncol 2025; 10:101668. [PMID: 39687475 PMCID: PMC11647082 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 10/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose In March 2020, a 1-week ultrahypofractionated adjuvant breast radiation therapy schedule, 26 Gy in 5 fractions, and telehealth were adopted to reduce the risk of COVID-19 for staff and patients. This study describes real-world 1-year late toxicity for ultrahypofractionation (including a sequential boost) and patient perspectives on this new schedule and telehealth workflows. Methods and Materials Consecutive patients were enrolled between March and August 2020. Patient-reported outcome measures, including the presence of breast pain, swelling, firmness, and others, were recorded using the European Organisation for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionairre (EORTC QLQ) BR45 at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Virtual teleconferencing without video was used. Patients were invited to use video at 1 year for a physician-based assessment, including breast inspection. Patient-reported experience measures were also collected at 1 year to capture how a shortened schedule and telehealth influenced patient experience. Results In total, 121 of 135 patients completed at least 2 assessments, of which 33 (25%) received a sequential boost. The majority of patients reported no toxicity or mild toxicity at all 3 time points: 76% at 3 months, 76% at 6 months, and 82% at 1 year. When comparing 26 Gy in 5 fractions alone versus 26 Gy in 5 fractions followed by a sequential boost, there was no difference in toxicity reported at 1 year. A total of 94% felt supported by the medical team throughout their treatment course using telehealth-only consultations. Only 27% actually agreed to video consultation for the purpose of breast inspection when offered. Conclusions Ultrahypofractionated breast radiation therapy leads to acceptable late toxicity at 1 year, even when followed by a hypofractionated tumor bed boost. Patient satisfaction with ultrahypofractionated treatment and virtual consultations without video was high. Further investigation concerning the patient's acceptance of video consultations for a physician-based assessment, including breast inspection, is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Theresa Nicholson
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Discipline of Radiation Therapy &Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sinead Cleary
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gemma Farmer
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Orla Monaghan
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hannah O’ Driscoll
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Killian Nugent
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bahareh Khosravi
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eaine Quinlan
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Orla McArdle
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Beaumont Cancer Institute, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fran K. Duane
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Discipline of Radiation Therapy &Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Healy E, Bazan JG. A Boost in the Wrong Direction? Rethinking Escalated Approaches for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 120:317. [PMID: 39244350 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Healy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCI Health Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, California
| | - Jose G Bazan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al-Rashdan A. In Regard to Laughlin et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:304. [PMID: 38631741 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulla Al-Rashdan
- Dalhousie University School of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vargas CE, Laughlin BS. In Reply to Al-Rashdan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:305-306. [PMID: 38631742 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Brady S Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ratosa I, Montero A, Ciervide R, Alvarez B, García-Aranda M, Valero J, Chen-Zhao X, Lopez M, Zucca D, Hernando O, Sánchez E, de la Casa MA, Alonso R, Fernandez-Leton P, Rubio C. Ultra-hypofractionated one-week locoregional radiotherapy for patients with early breast cancer: Acute toxicity results. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100764. [PMID: 38516338 PMCID: PMC10955656 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy is the standard of care for all patients with breast cancer, irrespective of stage or prior treatments. While extreme hypofractionation is accepted for early-stage tumours, its application in irradiating locoregional lymph nodes remains controversial. Materials and methods A prospective registry analysis from July 2020 to September 2023 included 276 patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with one-week ultra-hypofractionation (UHF) at 26 Gy in 5 fractions on the whole breast (58.3 %) or thoracic wall (41.7 %) and ipsilateral regional lymph nodes and simultaneous integrated boost (58.3 %). Primary endpoint was assessment of acute adverse events (AEs). Secondarily, onset of early-delayed toxicity was assessed. A minimum 6-month follow-up was required for assessing potential treatment-related early-delayed complications. Acute or late complications attributable to treatment were assessed at inclusion using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 criteria. Results With a median follow-up of 19 months (range 1-49 months), 159 (57.6 %) patients reported AEs, predominantly grade (G) 1 (n = 139, 50.4 %) and G2 (n = 20, 7.8 %). Skin acute toxicity was common (G1/2: 134, G3: 14), while breast oedema occurred in 10 patients (G1: 9, G2: 1), and 15.9 % reported breast pain (G1: 42, G2: 2). Ipsilateral arm oedema was observed in 1.8 % patients. For patients with a follow-up beyond 6 months (n = 213), 23.4 % patients reported G1/G2 skin AEs, 8.8 % had G1/G2 breast/chest wall oedema, and 8.9 % experienced arm lymphedema. There were no cases of brachial plexopathy or G3 toxicity in this group of patients. Conclusions One-week UHF adjuvant locoregional radiation is well-tolerated, displaying low-toxicity profiles comparable to other studies using similar irradiation schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Ciervide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Alvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Xin Chen-Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes Lopez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Zucca
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ovidio Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Rosa Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Carmen Rubio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|