A new technique of endoprosthetic replacement for osteosarcoma of proximal femur with intra-articular extension

Extra-articular hip resection with maintenance of pelvic continuity in malignant tumours of the proximal femur with articular invasion

INTRODUCTION

Extra-articular hip resection may be necessary in cases of malignant tumour of the pelvic bone or of the proximal femur invading the hip joint. When the tumour is in the proximal femur, it is possible to resect the acetabulum en bloc by performing a periacetabular osteotomy, but this creates a discontinuity in the pelvic ring with difficult reconstruction and diminished function. Several techniques described recently seek to be as sparing as possible on the pelvic bone by preserving the posterior column or both columns in order to facilitate reconstruction and improve function. However, these still require complex reconstructions and can necessitate intra-pelvic dissection.

TECHNIQUE

We describe here an extra-articular hip resection technique for tumours of the proximal femur invading the joint, with maintenance of pelvic continuity by preserving both columns and the quadrilateral plate of the acetabulum, without intra-pelvic dissection, that can be performed on patients in whom the medial wall of the acetabulum is thick enough. Our preliminary assessments have included studies on dry bone and imaging analyses. The technique was first tested on a single cadaver pelvis (encompassing 2 hips) and subsequently performed on a patient with a pathological fracture of the femoral neck due to osteosarcoma secondary to Paget's disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Further clinical applications are essential to evaluate the overall effectiveness, safety and impact on patient functionality of this experimental technique.

Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?

BACKGROUND

While extra-articular resection (EAR) of the knee and shoulder joint is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, the oncological and functional risks of EAR of the hip joint are unknown. We aimed to compare these risks between EAR of the hip joint and intra-articular resection (IAR).

METHODS

We conducted a comparative study of 75 patients who underwent en-bloc tumour resection and limb-salvage reconstruction for bone sarcomas of the peri-acetabulum between 1996 and 2016. We divided patients into two groups for analyses; EAR (n = 21) and IAR (n = 54).

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in oncological outcomes; the 5-year cumulative incidence of disease-specific death was 34% and 35% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.943), and the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 26% and 34%, respectively (p = 0.482). The most common complications were dislocation (28%) and deep infection (28%); there was equally no difference between the groups. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 66% and 65% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.795), and were significantly lower in patients with deep infection (52% vs. 69%; p = 0.013). In a sub-analysis on the outcomes in patients who underwent PI-uninvolved PII-resection for chondrosarcoma, no major differences in oncologic and functional outcomes were confirmed.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing EAR and limb-salvage reconstructions of the hip joint have undistinguishable oncological, clinical and functional outcomes compared to those undergoing IAR and reconstructions. If preoperative imaging suggests articular tumour involvement, there appears to be no detrimental effect of undertaking EAR to optimise local control.

Extra-articular resection for bone sarcomas involving the hip joint

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the oncologic, functional, and clinical outcomes after the extra-articular resection and limb-salvage reconstruction of the hip joint.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 34 patients who underwent extra-articular resection of the hip joint for bone sarcomas between 1996 and 2016 was conducted. The primary tumor site was pelvis in 26 patients (76%) and femur in eight (24%).

RESULTS

The surgical margins achieved were clear in 31 (91%) patients, and seven (21%) patients developed local recurrence; mostly occurring in pelvic tumors (n = 6). The 3-year overall survival was 63% with a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 5-219), which showed no statistical difference in tumor location. The most common complication was deep infection (n = 7) and dislocation (n = 7), mostly seen in pelvic tumors. Implant failure was seen in two patients with pelvic tumors, while no failure was noted in patients with femoral tumors. The median Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 69%; 67% for pelvic tumors and 73% for femoral tumors (P = .535).

CONCLUSION

Despite complex surgery, extra-articular resection of the hip joint can achieve oncologically and functionally acceptable outcomes. While tumors of the pelvis are associated with a higher incidence of infection and local recurrence after resection, resection of tumors involving the femur are well tolerated.

Treatment of intra-articular hip malignancy with extra-articular resection, preservation of the acetabular columns, and total hip arthroplasty

Intra-articular malignant lesions of the hip present significant challenges. Resection often requires large resection of the acetabular bone and pelvic columns. Concurrent reconstruction options after intra-articular hip tumors are challenging and may necessitate the use of techniques and implants with uncertain long-term survivorship. We present a case of an intra-articular hip malignancy with extra-articular resection and preservation of the acetabular columns with reconstruction using a cementless acetabular shell fixed with screws.

Extra-articular resection is a limb-salvage option for sarcoma involving the hip joint

INTRODUCTION

With the development of surgical techniques and improvements in hemi-pelvic prosthesis systems, extra-articular resection can be performed as a limb-salvage procedure in selected patients whose hip joint is invaded by a sarcoma. The aim of this study was to describe the indications for and the technical details, post-operative complications, and oncologic and functional outcomes of this procedure.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with Enneking IIB or IB sarcoma who underwent extra-articular resection of the hip joint were enrolled. A modular pelvic endoprosthesis combined with a femoral endoprosthesis was used to reconstruct the bone and joint defect. Pathological diagnoses included osteosarcoma (7 patients), chondrosarcoma (7), undifferentiated high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma (3), and malignant peripheral nerve-sheath tumour (1).

RESULTS

Wide, marginal and intralesional surgical margin was achieved in 13, four and one patients, respectively. There was one peri-operative death and the other 17 patients were followed up for 35.0 months (range, 10-75 months). Three patients had early-stage dislocations. One had a traumatic dislocation three years later. Two patients had wound complications. The average MSTS 93 score was 63.5% ± 10.8%. Four patients had local recurrence. The estimated three-year disease-free survival and overall survival for the 18 patients were both 50.0%.

CONCLUSION

Although technically demanding, extra-articular resection of hip is a limb-salvage procedure that is worth considering for carefully selected patients.