Pericardial window procedures: Implications on left ventricular function

Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of a Controversial Entity

Pericardial decompression syndrome is an ambiguous clinical entity which has generated controversy regarding its existence. Following pericardial decompression, patients experienced clinical deterioration ranging in complications from pulmonary edema to death that could not be attributed to any other distinct clinical pathology. Multiple theories have suggested the pathophysiology behind pericardial decompression syndrome is related to preload-afterload mismatch following pericardial decompression, coronary microvascular ischemia, and stress from high adrenergic state. Our review aims to describe this syndrome by analyzing demographics, etiology of pericardial effusion, method of drainage, volume of pericardial fluid removed, time to decompensation, and clinical outcomes. A systematic review of MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar literature databases were queried for case reports, case series, review articles, and abstracts published in English journals between 1983 and December 2022. Each author's interpretation of echocardiographic and/or pulmonary arterial catheterization data provided in the case reports was used to characterize ventricular dysfunction. Based on our inclusion criteria, 72 cases of pericardial decompression syndrome were included in our review. Our results showed that phenotypic heterogeneity was present based on echocardiographic findings of right/left or biventricular failure with similar proportions in each type of ventricular dysfunction. Time to decompensation was similar between immediate, subacute, and acute cases with presentation varying between hypoxic respiratory failure and shock. This review article highlights theories behind the pathophysiology, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic options in this high mortality condition.

Pericardial Decompression Syndrome After Drainage of Chronic Pericardial Effusions

Pericardial decompression syndrome (PDS) is a potentially fatal disorder of left ventricular function that sometimes occurs after drainage of a pericardial effusion for cardiac tamponade. Patients at risk for PDS are difficult to identify. Here, we report 2 cases where PDS developed after drainage of effusions that had been present for years, suggesting that patients with chronic effusions are at higher risk for PDS. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

A Comprehensive Systemic Literature Review of Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: Often Unrecognized and Potentially Fatal Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Pericardial Decompression Syndrome (PDS) is defined as paradoxical hemodynamic deterioration and/or pulmonary edema, commonly associated with ventricular dysfunction. This phenomenon was first described by Vandyke in 1983. PDS is a rare but formidable complication of pericardiocentesis, which, if not managed appropriately, is fatal. PDS, as an entity, has discrete literature; this review is to understand its epidemiology, presentation, and management.

METHODOLOGY

Medline, Science Direct and Google Scholar databases were utilized to do a systemic literature search. PRISMA protocol was employed. Abstracts, case reports, case series and clinical studies were identified from 1983 to 2019. A total of 6508 articles were reviewed, out of which, 210 were short-listed, and after removal of duplicates, 49 manuscripts were included in this review. For statistical analysis, patient data was tabulated in SPSS version 20. Cases were divided into two categories surgical and percutaneous groups. t-test was conducted for continuous variable and chi-square test was conducted for categorical data used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 42 full-length case reports, 2 poster abstracts, 3 case series of 2 patients, 1 case series of 4 patients and 1 case series of 5 patients were included in the study. A total of 59 cases were included in this manuscript. Our data had 45.8% (n=27) males and 54.2% (n=32) females. The mean age of patients was 48.04 ± 17 years. Pericardiocentesis was performed in 52.5% (n=31) cases, and pericardiostomy was performed in 45.8% (n=27). The most common identifiable cause of pericardial effusion was found to be malignancy in 35.6% (n=21). Twenty-three 23 cases reported pre-procedural ejection fraction, which ranged from 20%-75% with a mean of 55.8 ± 14.6%, while 26 cases reported post-procedural ejection fraction which ranged from 10%-65% with a mean of 30% ± 15.1%. Data was further divided into two categories, namely, pericardiocentesis and pericardiostomy. The outcome as death was significant in the pericardiostomy arm with a p-value of < 0.00. The use of inotropic agents for the treatment of PDS was more common in needle pericardiocentesis with a p-value of 0.04. Lastly, the computed recovery time did not yield any significance with a p-value of 0.275.

CONCLUSION

Pericardial decompression syndrome is a rare condition with high mortality. Operators performing pericardial drainage should be aware of this complication following drainage of cardiac tamponade, since early recognition and expeditious supportive care are the only therapeutic modalities available for adequate management of this complication.

Oncologic Emergencies-The Old, the New, and the Deadly

Cancer continues to be a leading cause of death despite a broader understanding of its biology and the development of novel therapies. Nonetheless, with an increasing survival of this population, intensivists must be aware of the associated emergencies, both old and new. Oncologic emergencies can be seen as an initial presentation of the disease or precipitated by its treatment. In this review, we present key oncologic emergencies that may be encountered in daily practice, complications associated with innovative therapies, and treatment-related adverse events.

Recurrent cardiac tamponade: an initial presentation of lung adenocarcinoma

A 63-year-old hypertensive woman presented initially to the surgical team with right upper quadrant pain, the patient was otherwise asymptomatic and clinically well. An abdominal CT scan excluded any surgical diagnoses but rather showed a pericardial effusion. When the cardiology team urgently reviewed her, they found her to be hypotensive and tachycardic with a raised jugular venous pressure. A diagnosis of cardiac tamponade was made and was transferred to the coronary care unit for an emergency pericardiocentesis. She developed tamponade on further occasions requiring pericardiocentesis. The underlying cause was investigated and following pericardial fluid analysis and subsequent imaging, metastatic lung adenocarcinoma was diagnosed.