Multiple hepatic sclerosing hemangioma mimicking metastatic liver tumor successfully treated by laparoscopic surgery: Report of a case

Multiple sclerosing hemangiomas mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a prevalent malignant tumor affecting the liver, and surgical resection and liver transplantation are the primary treatment options for early-stage HCC patients. However, the presence of benign hepatic tumors with similar imaging characteristics to HCC poses challenges in diagnosing and treating the disease, often resulting in misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. This case report presents a 52-year-old female patient who exhibited space-occupying liver lesions on abdominal CT and MRI scans. Based on pathological sections from other hospitals, liver malignancy was highly suspected, and hepatocellular tumor was diagnosed preoperatively. But the tumor markers of the patient were all within the normal range. After evaluating the overall condition of the patient, we finally chose the diagnosis and treatment of dissection and partial hepatectomy. Surprisingly, the final diagnosis of postoperative pathology was sclerosing hemangioma. The patient recovered well and was discharged 2 weeks later. Hepatic sclerosing hemangioma is an extremely rare disease that can be easily mistaken for malignant liver tumors due to absence of typical imaging presentations. The diagnosis also needs to be differentiated from other benign tumors, such as liver adenoma and liver abscess, according to the medical history, symptoms, and auxiliary examinations. Therefore, special attention should be given to the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing hemangioma.

Added Value of Ultrasound-Based Multimodal Imaging to Diagnose Hepatic Sclerosed Hemangioma before Biopsy and Resection

Imaging methods have the overwhelming advantage of being non-invasive in the diagnosis of hepatic lesions and, thanks to technical developments in the field of ultrasound (US), radiation exposure can also be avoided in many clinical situations. In particular, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) outperforms other radiological methods in regard to real-time images, repeatability, and prompt reporting and demonstrates relatively few contraindications and adverse reactions. In this study, we reported in detail a rare benign tumor: hepatic sclerosed hemangioma (HSH). We described US-based multimodal imaging (B-flow imaging, US elastography, and Sonazoid CEUS) features of this HSH case. Furthermore, by summarizing the recently published literature on the imaging diagnosis of HSH, we offered readers comprehensive knowledge of conventional imaging methods (CT, MRI) and CEUS in the diagnosis of HSH and preliminarily discussed their mechanism of pathology-based diagnosis. Our multimodal imaging approach may provide a diagnostic strategy for HSH, thus avoiding unnecessary biopsy or resection.

One stop shop approach for the diagnosis of liver hemangioma

Hepatic hemangioma is usually detected on a routine ultrasound examination because of silent clinical behaviour. The typical ultrasound appearance of hemangioma is easily recognizable and quickly guides the diagnosis without the need for further investigation. But there is also an entire spectrum of atypical and uncommon ultrasound features and our review comes to detail these particular aspects. An atypical aspect in standard ultrasound leads to the continuation of explorations with an imaging investigation with contrast substance [ultrasound/ computed tomography/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)]. For a clinician who practices ultrasound and has an ultrasound system in the room, the easiest, fastest, non-invasive and cost-effective method is contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Approximately 85% of patients are correctly diagnosed with this method and the patient has the correct diagnosis in about 30 min without fear of malignancy and without waiting for a computer tomography (CT)/MRI appointment. In less than 15% of patients CEUS does not provide a conclusive appearance; thus, CT scan or MRI becomes mandatory and liver biopsy is rarely required. The aim of this updated review is to synthesize the typical and atypical ultrasound aspects of hepatic hemangioma in the adult patient and to propose a fast, non-invasive and cost-effective clinical-ultrasound algorithm for the diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma.

Hepatic sclerosed hemangioma and sclerosing cavernous hemangioma: a radiological study

Purpose

To investigate and compare the CT and MRI features of hepatic sclerosed hemangioma (HSH) and sclerosing cavernous hemangioma (SCH).

Materials and methods

Twelve HSH cases and 36 SCH cases were included, the imaging findings on CT (9 HSH and 34 SCH) and MRI (8 HSH and 10 SCH) were analyzed. Qualitative image analysis included the location, size, shape, capsular retraction, density, calcification, signal intensity on T₁-weighted image (T₁WI) and T₂-weighted image (T₂WI), presence of diffusion restriction, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map, transient hepatic attenuation difference around the lesion, and the dynamic enhancement patterns.

Results

The presence of liver cirrhosis in patients with HSH (3/12) was higher than SCH (1/36) (P = 0.043). The morphology appearance before enhancement showed no significant difference between HSH and SCH. Moreover, SCH had a stronger trend of centripetal enhancement patterns of cavernous hemangiomas (83.3%) compared to HSH (25%) (P < 0.001). Due to more frequent atypical enhancement features, containing rim-like enhancement, no enhancement, and peripheral heterogeneous enhancement, the misdiagnosis rate of HSH (75%) was significantly higher than that of SCH (16.7%) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the ADC values of HSH and SCH were both higher than that of the surrounding liver parenchyma (P = 0.009, P = 0.002); however, there was no significant difference in ADC values between themselves (P = 0.613).

Conclusion

SCH showed the same trend of centripetal enhancement characteristics as typical hemangioma, while HSH exhibited atypical enhancement features due to complete sclerosis. Higher ADC values might contribute to the identification of atypical HSH and SCH from malignancies.

Hepatic Sclerosing Hemangioma Mimicking Malignancy: A Case and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Sclerosing hemangiomas of the liver are rare, benign tumors with degenerative changes. These degenerative changes, however, often obscure the true, benign nature of the tumor and give them features indistinguishable from other malignant processes, thus making the diagnosis difficult.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 70-year-old male without any previously diagnosed liver disease or malignant process presented with incidental right hepatic mass in ultrasonography and weight loss. Physical exam was unremarkable. The labs were significant for mild pancytopenia, elevated total bilirubin and slightly decreased transferrin. Follow-up triple phase-contrast CT scan of the abdomen revealed a lobulated, poorly demarcated lesion measuring 4.8 x 4.5 cm, located in segment V of the liver with encasement of the left portal branch. The overall picture was indeterminate but highly suspicious for malignancy. A decision was made to perform a CT-guided biopsy which revealed sclerosing hemangioma of the liver.

CONCLUSION

It is challenging to differentiate sclerosing hepatic hemangioma from atypical hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic tumors utilizing only imaging modalities. The diagnostic workup should include biopsy of the atypical liver lesion which unveils the final diagnosis and avoid subjecting the patient to an extensive, and invasive surgical resection.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for differentiating hepatic sclerosing hemangioma from malignant tumor

BACKGROUND

To investigate the imaging features of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate hepatic sclerosing hemangioma from malignant tumors.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included 18 patients with sclerosing hemangioma and 54 patients with common hepatic malignant tumor, including hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic adenocarcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma, who were examined using gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI from January 2008 to June 2019. Imaging features including signal intensity, tumor margins, enhancement pattern, and presence or absence of diffusion restriction were analyzed. Significant MRI features for predicting sclerosing hemangioma were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Diagnostic performances of each imaging feature and combinations of significant imaging features were summarized.

RESULTS

In the multivariable analysis, irregular margins (odds ratio [OR], 10.12; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.27-80.94; p = 0.029), centripetal or internal nodular enhancement in the transitional phase (OR, 13.58; 95 % CI, 1.48-124.82; p = 0.021), and absence of diffusion restriction (OR, 39.20; 95 % CI, 4.82-318.49; p = 0.001) were significant imaging features for the diagnosis of sclerosing hemangioma. Presence of at least two significant imaging features had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 88.9 %, 96.3 %, and 94.4 %, respectively, for diagnosing sclerosing hemangioma.

CONCLUSION

Combinations of two or more of the significant imaging features (irregular margins, centripetal or internal nodular enhancement in the transitional phase, and absence of diffusion restriction) were effective for differentiating hepatic sclerosing hemangioma from malignant tumors using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Hepatic Sclerosing Hemangioma Simulating Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Rare Case

Sclerosing hemangiomas of the liver are rare benign tumors of the liver. Although hepatic hemangiomas are the most common benign liver tumor, they are mostly cavernous in nature. A hepatic sclerosing hemangioma is defined by presence of fibrosis and hyalinization as a result of degenerative changes in a cavernous hemangioma. The radiological features of sclerosing hepatic hemangioma can resemble those of cholangiocarcinoma, fibrolamellar carcinoma, or metastasis. We present a case of a hepatic sclerosing hemangioma in which an unusual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) appearance lead to radiographic concern for gallbladder carcinoma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case in the literature of a hepatic sclerosing hemangioma mimicking a gallbladder carcinoma.

Hepatic Sclerosing Hemangioma with Predominance of the Sclerosed Area Mimicking a Biliary Cystadenocarcinoma

We report here an extremely rare case of hepatic sclerosing hemangioma mimicking a biliary cystadenocarcinoma. A previously healthy 39-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of a large tumor in the liver. Abdominal computed tomography revealed early peripheral ring enhancement in the arterial phase and slight internal heterogeneous enhancement in the delayed phase. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a tumor with low intensity in the T1-weighted image and very high intensity in the fat-saturated T2-weighted image. The patient underwent hepatectomy for a possible malignant liver tumor. Grossly, the tumor appeared as a white, solid, and cystic mass (weighted 1.1 kg and measured 170×100×80 mm) that was elastic, soft, and homogeneous with a yellowish area. Histological examination showed that the tumor mostly consisted of fibrotic areas with hyalinization. The typical histology of cavernous hemangioma was confirmed in part, and the tumor was diagnosed as a sclerosing hemangioma with predominancy of the sclerosed area. A review of 20 cases reported previously revealed that only 2 (10%) patients were diagnosed as having sclerosing hemangioma preoperatively.

Preoperative diagnosis of the sclerosed hemangioma of the liver using multimodality imaging findings: A case report

A sclerosed hemangioma of the liver is a rare benign lesion characterized by fibrosis and hyalinization of a hepatic cavernous hemangioma as a result of degeneration. This condition has been difficult to correctly diagnose with imaging. Our patient was a 57-year-old man whose computed tomography (CT) scan showed a mass of 45 mm in diameter in the lateral segment. On dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, the lesion was found to comprise peripheral, gradual, and heterogeneous enhanced areas with a central nonenhanced area; malignancy was suspected. On magnetic resonance imaging, the peripheral area showed slight hperintensity on T2-weighted image, and showed a similar intensity on T1- and diffusion-weighted images as compared to the background liver and gradual enhancement, and the presence of abundant fibrous tissue was suspected. Conversely, the central area showed remarkable hyperintensity on T2-weighted images and no enhancement, and degeneration or hyalinization was suspected. The mass showed no uptake of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose (FDG). Some imaging findings suspected a benign tumor, and sclerosed hemangioma with abundant fibrosis and hyalinization was pathologically confirmed. Herein, we report a case of sclerosed hemangioma focusing on possible preoperative diagnosis using a combination of multimodality imaging findings—diffusion-weighted imaging and FDG-positron emission tomography imaging.