A figure-eight suture loop with Kirschner wires for fixation of anteromedial coronoid process fractures: A case series

Outcomes and complications after treatment for anteromedial facet fracture of the coronoid process: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fracture of the anteromedial facet (AMF) of the coronoid process is associated with varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI). However, there is still controversy regarding the optimal treatment for AMF fracture. The purpose of this study is to report on a systematic review of the outcomes and complications after treatment for AMF fracture.

METHODS

This study was conducted using electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus. Studies reporting outcome scores and complications were included. Studies that did not utilize O'Driscoll classification for AMF fractures were excluded. Through conduct of a thorough review of included studies, definite VPMRI were identified and cases involving other injury mechanisms were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles reporting on 246 patients were included. According to O'Driscoll classification, 6.2% of cases were anteromedial subtype I, 73.7% were subtype II, and 20.1% were subtype III. Two-hundred sixteen patients (87.8%) were treated surgically and 30 patients (12.2%) were treated conservatively. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries were 76.2% (157/206) and medial collateral ligament injuries were 16.9% (33/195). Among 216 cases who underwent surgical treatment, depending on the fragment size, displacement, and instability, coronoid fixation was performed in 189 cases and LCL repair alone was performed in 27 cases. The mean final Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 92.1 and the Broberg & Morrey score was 89.5. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 17.7% (41/232) and 12.9% (26/202).

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical and conservative treatment for AMF fractures resulted in satisfactory final clinical outcomes. However, high complication and reoperation rates were observed.

Reported outcome measures in complex fracture elbow dislocations: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Complex elbow fracture dislocations, dislocation with fracture of one or several surrounding bony stabilizers, are difficult to manage and associated with poor outcomes. While many studies have explored treatment strategies but a lack of standardization of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) makes cross-study comparison difficult. In this systematic review, we aim to describe what injury patterns, measured outcomes, and associated complications are reported in the complex elbow fracture dislocation literature to provide outcome reporting recommendations that will facilitate improved future cross-study comparison.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We queried PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles published between 2010 and 2022 reporting on adult patients who had a complex elbow fracture dislocation. Pathologic fractures were excluded. A bias assessment using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies criteria was conducted. For each article, patient demographics, injury pattern, outcome measures, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Ninety-one studies reporting on 3664 elbows (3654 patients) with an elbow fracture and dislocation (weighted mean age 44 years, follow-up of 30 months, 41% female) were evaluated. Of these, the injury pattern was described in 3378 elbows and included 2951 (87%) terrible triad injuries and 72 (2%) transolecranon fracture-dislocations. The three most commonly reported classification systems were: Mason classification for radial head fractures, Regan and Morrey coronoid classification for coronoid fractures, and O'Driscoll classification for coronoid fractures. Range of motion was reported in 87 (96%) studies with most reporting flexion (n = 70), extension (n = 62), pronation (n = 68), or supination (n = 67). Strength was reported in 11 (12%) studies. PROMs were reported in 83 (91%) studies with an average of 2.6 outcomes per study. There were 14 outcome scores including the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (n = 69 [83%]), the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score (n = 28 [34%]), the visual analog scale for pain (n = 27 [33%]), QuickDASH score (n = 13 [15.7%]), and Oxford Elbow score (n = 5 [6.0%]). No significance was found between the number of PROMs used per article and the year of publication (P = .313), study type (P = .689), complex fracture pattern (P = .211), or number of elbows included (P = .152).

CONCLUSION

There is great heterogeneity in reported PROMs in the complex elbow fracture dislocation literature. Although there is no gold standard PROM for assessing complex elbow fracture dislocations, we recommend the use of at least the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and DASH outcomes measures as well as visual analog scale pain rating scale in future studies to facilitate cross-study comparisons.

Pure varus posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow: Radiographic findings, treatment, and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Although varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) is a subtle elbow injury that involves anteromedial coronoid facet (AMCF) fracture and ligamentous injuries, treatment options and outcomes of VPMRI remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate radiographic findings, treatments, and outcomes of a large series of VPMRI.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 91 pure VPMRI cases with AMCF fracture (O'Driscoll classification anteromedial type) which were treated at 6 hospitals. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were investigated with a mean follow-up period of 46.8 months using the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH) score, and serial plain radiographs.

RESULTS

In AMCF fracture, there were 4 cases of subtype 1, 67 cases of subtype 2, and 20 cases of subtype 3. On MRI, complete tears of lateral collateral ligament and medial collateral ligament were observed in 83.1 % (59/71 cases) and 33.8 % (24/71 cases). Operative treatment was performed in 68 cases (74.7 %) including both side fixation in 40 cases (58.8 %), medial side fixation only in 17 cases (25.0 %), and lateral side fixation only in 11 cases (16.2 %). Nonoperative treatment was performed in 23 cases (25.3 %). The mean final MEPS and Quick-DASH scores were 93.7 and 7.9. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 22.0 % and 15.4 %. No significant differences regarding final clinical scores and range of motions were observed between the operative group and the nonoperative group, but significant differences were observed regarding number (p = 0.019) and displacement (p = 0.002) of coronoid fragment, and complication rate (p < 0.001) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Depending on the pattern of coronoid fragment and the degree of ligamentous injuries, operative treatment of unstable VPMRI using various fixation techniques including coronoid fixation and ligament repair yielded satisfactory final clinical outcomes. However, surgeons should be aware of the high complication and reoperation rates after operative treatment. Stable VPMRI with AMCF fracture involving minimal displacement or small number of fragments can be treated nonoperatively.

Conservative versus surgical management of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature on conservative and surgical management of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases for published studies by complying with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using the keywords "isolated coronoid fracture," "O'Driscoll type 2 coronoid fracture," "anteromedial coronoid fracture," "anteromedial facet coronoid fracture," "posteromedial rotatory instability," and "varus posteromedial rotatory instability." Patients were divided into conservative treatment and surgical treatment groups. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies were assessed to determine each article's quality. The primary outcomes of the present reviews were the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, and the secondary outcomes were associated with complications and reoperations. Eligible trials were independently chosen by two review authors, and a third reviewer resolved all disagreements.

RESULTS

The search yielded 458 records, among which 446 articles were of relevance, and 12 were included. In the final review, 138 patients were evaluated-98 (71%) who received surgical treatment and 40 (29%) who received conservative treatment. The mean MEPS score and the DASH score of surgical treatment were 91 and 8, respectively; 69.8% of patients had excellent scores, and 27.0% had good scores. The mean MEPS score and the DASH score of conservative treatment were 92 and 12, respectively; 70.6% of patients had excellent scores, and 23.5% had good scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In select cases, conservative treatment can achieve good results in the treatment of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture when a stricter indication is followed. However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the appropriate treatment for a particular fracture subtype, and there is a need for more high-quality randomized controlled trials to determine which treatment is superior.

Classification of coronoid process fractures: A pending question

Ulna coronoid fracture is a complicated elbow injury. Comprehensive classification of coronoid fracture can assist diagnosis, guide treatment, and improve prognosis. Existing coronoid fracture classifications are insufficient to interpret all fracture patterns. The coronoid fracture classification is associated with elbow-specific trauma patterns. Coronoid fractures are often associated with other elbow injuries, commonly with radial head fractures, which makes the clinical strategies inconsistent and prognosis poor. The current fracture classifications do not contain information about combined injuries. Preservation of ulnohumeral joint contact after trauma is critical to elbow mechanical and kinematic stability. Important fracture types for treatment include terrible-triad injuries and anteromedial facet fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation of these two fractures should be conducted when marked displacement of the fragment, elbow instability under stress, and complicated associated injuries. The current surgical tactics based on classifications are still controversial.

Plate fixation through an anterior approach for coronoid process fractures: A retrospective case series and a literature review

Coronoid process fractures of the ulna are difficult to treat, and are associated with stiffness, recurrent instability, and pain. Hence, treatment of coronoid process fractures are challenging for surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcomes of an anterior surgical approach associated with plate fixation for Regan and Morrey type II or type III fractures of the coronoid process.We evaluated 16 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment for fracture of the coronoid process of the ulna from March 2012 to July 2016. Ten patients had a type II fracture, and 6 patients had a type III fracture. All patients underwent surgical treatment for coronoid process fracture through an anterior approach. While preserving the neurovascular structure, all fractures were treated with buttress plate fixation, maintaining the gap between brachial artery and median nerve. Each patient was treated with concentric reduction of both the ulnotrochlear and the radiocapitellar articulations, without any evidence of elbow instability, except 1 case, who showed some medial instability.At the final follow-up, solid osseous union was confirmed for all coronoid fractures. The average time to radiologic union was 16.3 weeks. The mean flexion-extension arc was 124.25 ± 12.12 degree, with a mean flexion contracture of 8.25 ± 4.36 degree, and further flexion of 132.5 ± 9.31 degree. The mean forearm rotation arc was 167.81 ± 10.49 degree. Fifteen patients achieved a functional arc of motion. The mean Mayo elbow performance score was 92.1 points, with 12 excellent cases and 4 good cases.Coronoid process fractures of the ulna can be treated successfully with plate fixation through an anterior surgical approach, which allows for accurate reduction and rigid internal fixation and early functional exercise, resulting in a reasonable outcome.

Arthroscopic Osteosynthesis for the Treatment of Coronoid Process Fractures: A Case Series

The treatment strategy and surgical indication for coronoid process fractures are not clear. Many methods of surgery have been described. We report on the use of arthroscopic osteosynthesis for this type of fracture. This method is minimally invasive and effective for confirming the reduction, and it is advantageous for postoperative pain and early recovery after surgery.