Intrapericardial gossypiboma: Rare cause of intrathoracic mass

[The curious case of a cardiac mass : A case report]

BACKGROUND

Retained foreign bodies are dreadful events associated with invasive procedures. Their occurrence implicate physical complications as well as serious professional and medico-legal consequences. Cases of retained surgical items, in the pericardial space, following cardiothoracic surgery are rare and their management is delicate as the risks of their removal must be thoroughly weighed against the complications of leaving them inside the chest.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a retained foreign body, discovered in an asymptomatic patient, on a routine medical check-up, 4 years after cardiac surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and paraclinical manifestations of retained surgical foreign bodies are nonspecific. The progress of cardiac imaging means makes it possible to identify these rare foreign bodies with greater precision, and allows, with extreme caution, to monitor patients who are perfectly asymptomatic and who are reluctant to undergo surgery.

Forensic - Pathological SEM/EDX analysis in prosecution of medical malpractice

The retention of gauze within the mediastinum is considered an exceptional finding. We are presenting the case of a woman, affected by aorto-mitral valvulopathy, in whose mediastinum was found, during the autopsy, a gauzome without signs of active phlogosis, which had been "forgotten" in a previous surgery, acted 14 years before the death. A 39 y.o. woman had received surgical treatment of double aorto-mitral valve substitution and tricuspid plastic. At age 53, she successfully received surgery once again at a different hospital; she then started rehabilitation therapy, during which she deceased due to sudden hematemesis with infectious multi organ failure. During the autopsy, a 5 cm long surgical gauze was found in the mediastinum. A SEM/EDX (Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy) exam was ran on the foreign body and a sample of the same gauze used in the cardiac-surgical department of the hospital the victim had passed away in, to act a comparison between the two kinds of material. The exam showed a morphological difference between exogenous fibers incorporated within the gauzome and the control gauze. This case highlights the diagnostic and interpretative challenges in finding a foreign body within the mediastinum without signs of active phlogosis. SEM/EDX investigations executed on the gauzome and a "control gauze" allowed the attribution of malpractice to the first hospital the victim had been operated in 14 years before the exitus. The SEM/EDX exam confirms its importance in correctly identifying the case, which becomes an example for similar happenings.