Appendicular endometriosis: A case report and review of literature

Connecting the dots: Exploring appendiceal endometriosis in women with diaphragmatic endometriosis

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to ascertain the prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis (AppE) in patients diagnosed with diaphragmatic endometriosis (DiaE), compare it with the prevalence in patients without DiaE, and delineate the anatomical distribution of endometriotic lesions within these cohorts.

STUDY DESIGN

Comparison of the characteristics of patients with AppE and DiaE with the characteristics of patients with abdominal endometriosis without diaphragmatic involvement, in a prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center; endometriosis center.

PATIENTS

A cohort of 1765 patients with histologically confirmed endometriosis INTERVENTIONS: Evaluation of correlations between demographic, clinical, and surgical variables of AppE patients with DiaE and without DiaE. We performed appendectomies selectively, in the presence of gross abnormalities of the appendix, such as endometriotic implants, edema, tortuosity, and discoloration of the organ.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients' characteristics were evaluated using basic descriptive statistics (chi-square test or Fisher's exact test). A logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship (hazard ratio) between patient characteristics and the presence of DiaE and AppE.

MAIN RESULTS

Within a cohort of 1765 patients with histologically confirmed endometriosis, 31 were identified with AppE (1.8 %), and 83 with DiaE (4.7 %). The prevalence of DiaE was significantly elevated at 30.1 % (25/83), among patients with AppE compared to those without AppE, who showed a DiaE prevalence of 7.2 % (6/83). The calculated odds ratio for DiaE given the presence of AppE was 5.5, 95 % CI 2.1-14.4, p = 0.0004, and risk ratio was 4.2, 95 % CI 1.8-9.6, p = 0.0008, indicating a profound association. Surgical interventions did not lead to significant perioperative or postoperative complications. In the group with DiaE, the left ovary was affected in 96 % of cases (24/25), p < 0.05, the right ureter in 80 % of cases (20/25), p < 0.01 (in 19/25 only the serosa was affected, due to external compression of an endometriotic nodule of the parametrium). Concurrent AppE and right diaphragm was found in 92 % of cases (23/25 patients), p < 0.001. The concurrent presence of DiaE and AppE was often associated with severe endometriosis, rASRM IV 72 % OR = 3, 95 % CI (1.216-7.872).

CONCLUSION

The investigation delineates a marked association between AppE and DiaE, with an odds ratio of 5.5 and risk ratio of 4.2, suggesting a markedly increased likelihood of DiaE in patients with AppE. These statistics significantly substantiate the notion that AppE can serve as a predictive marker for DiaE, underscoring the necessity for a meticulous intraoperative assessment of diaphragmatic regions in patients diagnosed with AppE. The absence of a significant correlation between the depth of DiaE infiltration and the presence of AppE implies that the detection of AppE should prompt a thorough search for DiaE, regardless of the perceived severity of the endometriosis or preoperative results of diaphragmatic MRI.

Nodular image in the appendix observed on ultrasound: endometriosis or neuroendocrine neoplasia?

Objective

To evaluate the association between clinical and imaging with surgical and pathological findings in patients with suspected neuroendocrine tumor of appendix and/or appendix endometriosis.

Methods

Retrospective descriptive study conducted at the Teaching and Research Institute of Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, in which medical records and databases of patients with suspected neuroendocrine tumor of appendix and/or endometriosis of appendix were analyzed by imaging.

Results

Twenty-eight patients were included, all of which had some type of appendix alteration on the ultrasound examination. The pathological outcome of the appendix found 25 (89.3%) lesions compatible with endometriosis and three (10.7%) neuroendocrine tumors. The clinical findings of imaging and surgery were compared with the result of pathological anatomy by means of relative frequency.

Conclusion

It was possible to observe a higher prevalence of appendix endometriosis when the patient presented more intense pain symptoms. The image observed on ultrasound obtained a high positive predictive value for appendicular endometriosis.

Appendectomy in endometriosis: an update on surgical indications and management of uncommon diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Abnormal appendiceal disease is commonly encountered following an appendectomy when performed in patients with endometriosis. Appendiceal endometriosis is the most notable finding and can affect up to 39% of patients with endometriosis. Despite this knowledge, guidelines for performing an appendectomy have not been formally established. In this article, we review the surgical indications for an appendectomy at the time of endometriosis surgery and discuss the management of other diseases that may be encountered following the histopathologic evaluation of an excised appendix.

RECENT FINDINGS

Removal of the appendix in patients with endometriosis contributes to optimal surgical management. Relying on abnormal appendiceal appearance for removal may leave endometriosis-affected appendices. For this reason, utilizing risk factors to guide surgical management is essential. Common appendiceal diseases are sufficiently managed with appendectomy. Uncommon diseases may require further surveillance.

SUMMARY

Emerging data in our field support the performance of an appendectomy at the time of endometriosis surgery. Guidelines for performing a concurrent appendectomy should be formalized to encourage preoperative counselling and management for patients with risk factors for appendiceal endometriosis. Abnormal diseases is frequently encountered after appendectomy in the setting of endometriosis surgery and further management is based on the histopathology of the specimen.

Appendiceal Endometriosis: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Objective: the purpose of this review was to evaluate the prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis and the safety of concomitant appendectomy in women with endometriosis or pelvic pain. Materials and Methods: We searched the electronic databases Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS). The search was not subject to any limitation in terms of time or method. The primary research question was: what is the prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis? The secondary research question was: is it safe to perform appendectomy during surgery for endometriosis? Publications that reported data about appendiceal endometriosis or appendectomy in women with endometriosis were reviewed regarding the inclusion criteria. Results: We found 1418 records. After review and screening, we included 75 studies published between 1975 and 2021. With regard to the first question of the review, we found 65 eligible studies and divided these into the following two categories: (a) endometriosis of the appendix presenting as acute appendicitis, and (b) endometriosis of the appendix as an incidental finding in gynecological surgery. Forty-four case reports described appendiceal endometriosis in women who were admitted for the treatment of pain in the right-sided lower abdomen. Endometriosis of the appendix was observed in 2.67% (range, 0.36-23%) of women who were admitted due to acute appendicitis. In addition, appendiceal endometriosis was an incidental finding during gynecological surgery in 7.23% of cases (range, 1-44.3%). With regard to the second question of the review, which was the safety of appendectomy in women with endometriosis or pelvic pain, we found 11 eligible studies. Reviewed cases had no significant intraoperative or follow-up complications during the 12 weeks. Conclusion: Based on the reviewed studies, coincidental appendectomy appears reasonably safe and was associated with no complications in the cases reviewed for the present report.

Appendiceal Endometriosis Presenting As Chronic Appendicitis: A Case Report

The origin of endometriosis has multiple theories, with controversy over which may demonstrate the prominent pathophysiology. The most common extra-pelvic organ system affected by endometriosis is the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointestinal endometriosis (GE) accounts for 3 to 37% of all endometriosis cases, and appendiceal endometriosis is present in around 3% of GE cases, therefore constituting less than 1% of all endometriosis cases. In this report, we present a 24-year-old female with a past medical history significant for endometriosis status post two excisional laparoscopies who presented with eight months' duration of right lower quadrant pain, constant and stabbing, with rebound tenderness. Appendectomy and histopathology demonstrated focal endometriosis, diffuse serosal fibrovascular adhesions involving the appendiceal serosa/subserosa, as well as a dilated lumen filled with hemorrhagic content. When the appendix is not considered in endometriosis pathology, patients are at increased risk for unresolved pain and further laparoscopic procedures. Prophylactic appendectomy appears to be a worthwhile consideration in patients with chronic pelvic pain, given the high frequency of appendiceal pathology.

Emergency surgery for appendectomy and incidental diagnosis of superficial peritoneal endometriosis in fertile age women

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study aimed to evaluate the presence of superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SUP) in women referred to emergency surgery for right iliac fossa (RIF) pain and undergoing an appendectomy, considering which factors may be useful to suspect and identify endometriosis.

DESIGN

An observational case-control study was conducted on a group (n = 149) of fertile age women. After surgery, Group A was selected upon the diagnosis of endometriosis (n = 34); Group B (n = 115) represented the controls. Demographics, comorbidities and clinical findings were registered and analysed.

RESULTS

Appendicitis of various grades of severity was diagnosed in all patients, but SUP was also identified in 23%, of which 14.7% also presented with endometriosis of the appendix. Women in Group A reported chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia and oral contraceptive use more frequently. At multivariate analysis, factors associated with endometriosis were: age <40 years, autoimmune disorders, multiple allergies, abdominal chronic pain, associated gynaecological pain symptoms, Alvarado score ≤6, and inconclusive ultrasound findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidental finding of SUP in fertile age women presenting with an acute RIF pain and undergoing emergency surgery is a relevant observation. Clinical history and symptoms should guide surgeons in performing a correct diagnosis and in referring the patient to the gynaecology specialist.

Characteristic findings of appendicular endometriosis treated with single incision laparoscopic ileocolectomy: Case report

INTRODUCTION

We report the case of characteristic findings of appendicular endometriosis that presented as a submucosal tumor in the cecum without any abdominal symptoms treated with single-incision laparoscopic ileocolectomy.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

The patient was a 51-year-old woman (body mass index: 21.5) who underwent an examination to investigate the cause of a positive fecal occult blood test. Her laboratory test results were normal, without anemia or tumor marker elevation. Colonoscopy revealed a submucosal tumor in the cecum. Enhanced computed tomography (CT), fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-CT and magnetic resonance imaging failed to produce a clear diagnosis. Given the malignant potentiality of the tumor, ileocolectomy was considered potentially necessary, but she wished for minimally invasive surgery. She ultimately underwent ileocolectomy and lymphadenectomy with single-incision laparoscopic surgery. A pathological examination revealed the lesion to be appendicular endometriosis, and 14 lymph nodes with no malignancy were resected.

CONCLUSION

Appendicular endometriosis can present as a submucosal tumor in the cecum without any abdominal symptoms. Appendicular endometriosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of ileocecal submucosal tumor. Single-incision laparoscopic ileocolectomy was useful procedure for cecum tumor resection.