Superselective transcatheter arterial embolization of iatrogenic inferior epigastric artery after paracentesis: Unusual manifestation of hemoperitoneum

Endovascular management of severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding from angiodysplasia in the cecum: A case report

Gastrointestinal angiodysplasias (GIADs) are rare disorder but can cause noticeable issue clinically. Their clinical characteristics can range from being an asymptomatic incidental finding to causing life-threatening bleeding. Many modalities are applied for treating bleeding GIADs include endoscopic therapies, angiography with embolization, surgical resection, and pharmacologic therapy. However, since patients with GIADs are often aged and have many comorbidities, endoscopic therapies may not be the best initial option. Angiography is suitable method for hemodynamically unstable patients with active bleeding, patients with an unknown active bleeding source, and patients who are poor surgical candidates. Angiography not only diagnose the bleeding point but also provide therapeutic endovascular intervention at the same time. We report a case of endovascular management of severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding from a GIAD in the cecum using a mixture of n-butyl cyanoacrylate and lipiodol to embolize the bleeding source. Clinical symptoms improved without prominent complications.

Lights and Shadows of Paracentesis: Is an Ultrasound Guided Approach Enough to Prevent Bleeding Complications?

Paracentesis is a validated procedure for diagnosing and managing ascites. Although paracentesis is a safe procedure with a 1–2% risk of complications such as bleeding, it is necessary to inform the patient about the possible adverse events. We would like to share our experience with two cases of bleeding after paracentesis. In our unit, two major hemorrhagic complications occurred in 162 procedures performed over the year 2020 (frequency of bleeding complications: 1.2%). We report two clinical cases of post-paracentesis abdominal wall hematomas. Despite a similar clinical presentation, the management approach was different: in the first case, embolization of the epigastric artery supplying the hematoma was performed. In the second case, conservative treatment was adopted. Our report aims to provide food for thought about a potentially challenging hemorrhagic complication, even with the risk of adverse outcomes.

Inferior Epigastric Artery Injury due to Femoral Venipuncture for Neuroendovascular Intervention: Two Cases Requiring Transcatheter Arterial Embolization

Objective

Injury to the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) caused by femoral puncture may lead to retroperitoneal hematoma. We report on two cases of IEA injury due to femoral venipuncture for neuroendovascular intervention that resulted in hemorrhagic shock and required transcatheter arterial embolization.

Case Presentations

A 67-year-old woman and a 71-year-old man receiving dual antiplatelet therapy sustained injury to a branch of the IEA in the process of right femoral venipuncture for neuroendovascular intervention. In both cases, stent placement in the intracranial artery was accomplished as intended with systemic heparinization throughout the procedure; however, the patients became hypotensive during the procedure, and contrast-enhanced CT scans taken after the stenting revealed extravasation of contrast from the IEA and retroperitoneal hematoma. Transcatheter arterial embolization of the bleeding branch of the IEA was performed with the left femoral approach, and subsequent angiography confirmed the disappearance of the extravasation of contrast.

Conclusion

Femoral venipuncture for neuroendovascular intervention in patients receiving antithrombotic agents may cause IEA injury requiring transcatheter arterial embolization. The risk of IEA injury may be reduced by using the femoral head as a reference, performing ultrasound-guided puncture, and confirming the course of the IEA by femoral angiography before venipuncture.