Destructive Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head After a Single Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection: A Report of Two Cases

Rapid Osteoarthritis and Femoral Head Collapse: A Case Series

Introduction

Rapidly progressive hip osteoarthritis (OA) leading to femoral head collapse (FHC) following intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid injections is a perplexing variant of OA. We explored eight cases of chronic joint pain treated with IA corticosteroid injections. Subsequently, they experienced swift deterioration of the femoral head integrity within as little as 10 weeks. These cases underscore the need for a comprehensive assessment of risk factors versus benefits in this patient population.

Case Report

The study reveals a complex interplay between comorbidities, treatments, and outcomes. Patients exhibited various health factors, including obesity, smoking history, cancer treatment, and deficiencies in Vitamin D levels, which have been found to increase the risk of FHC. Furthermore, the study explores the chondrotoxicity of corticosteroids and local anesthetics used in IA injections. In vitro studies show complete loss of chondrocyte viability after a single dose of corticosteroids, potentially leading to cartilage degradation. In addition, local anesthetics may induce cellular demise and structural alterations in the articular cartilage. These factors highlight various influences affecting treatment outcomes in patients with OA.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this case series highlights the rare adverse outcome of rapidly progressive hip OA and FHC following IA corticosteroid injections and possible risk factors. While a definitive etiology remains unclear, the study provides valuable conclusions to aid in future treatment decision-making.

Intra-articular corticosteroids associated with increased risk of total hip arthroplasty at 5 years

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are commonly administered for hip pain. However, guidelines are conflicting on their efficacy, particularly in patients without arthritis. This study assessed for an association of corticosteroid injections and the incidence of total hip arthroplasty at 5 years.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of hip pain without femoroacetabular osteoarthritis who were administered an intra-articular corticosteroid injection of the hip within a 2-year period were identified from the Mariner PearlDiver database. Patient were matched to patients with a diagnosis of hip pain who did not receive an injection. 5-year incidence of total hip arthroplasty was compared between matched patients who received an intra-articular corticosteroid injection and those who did not.

RESULTS

2,540,154 patients diagnosed with hip pain without femoroacetabular arthritis were identified. 25,073 (0.9%) patients received a corticosteroid injection and were matched to an equal number of control patients. The incidence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) at 5-year-follow up was significantly higher for the corticosteroid cohort compared to controls (1.1% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001). The incidence and risk of THA increased along with number of injections (1 injection: 0.8%, OR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.34-1.42; p < 0.001, 2 injections: 1.1%; OR 1.45; CI, 1.40-1.50; p < 0.001, ⩾3 injections: 1.5%; OR 1.48; CI, 1.40-1.56; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There may be a dose-dependent association of corticosteroid injections and a greater risk of total hip arthroplasty at 5 years. These results along with the conflicting guidelines on the efficacy of intra-articular steroids for hip pain should prompt physicians to consider osteoarthritis progression that may occur in the setting of corticosteroid injections in non-arthritic hips.

Debate: Intra-articular steroid injections for osteoarthritis - harmful or helpful?☆,☆☆

Intra-articular corticosteroids injections are a widely used treatment for pain from symptomatic osteoarthritis. Systematic reviews show that the treatment effect is modest compared with intra-articular saline (often considered as placebo) and lasts for 2-4 weeks on average. Potentially as a consequence of limited therapeutic duration, repeated injections are often given up to 4 injections annually. In this context of repeat injections, recent evidence has emerged that intra-articular corticosteroids might be associated with more MRI-assessed quantitative cartilage thickness loss than saline injections. Guidelines vary in the recommendation for use of intra-articular corticosteroids. Given the frequency with which intra-articular corticosteroids injections are used, the size and scale of the population with osteoarthritis, it is critical to fully understand the benefits and drawbacks of intra-articular corticosteroids injections. That is the focus of this debate article.

Sickle Cell Trait: Is It Always Benign?

Sickle cell disease is a well-known homozygous inherited hemoglobinopathy that causes vaso-occlusive phenomena and chronic hemolysis. Vaso-occlusion results in sickle cell crisis and can eventually lead to complications involving multiple organ systems. However, the heterozygous counterpart, sickle cell trait (SCT) has less clinical significance as these patients are generally asymptomatic. This case series examines three unrelated patients with SCT ranging from the age of 27 to 61 years, who presented with pain in multiple long bones. Hemoglobin electrophoresis confirmed a diagnosis of SCT. Radiographic images of the affected sites showed osteonecrosis (ON). Interventions included pain management and bilateral hip replacement in two of the patients. Historically, vaso-occlusive disease in patients with SCT with no evidence of hemolysis or other hallmark findings of sickle cell disease is rare. There are limited reported cases of ON in SCT patients. Clinicians should explore other hemoglobinopathies not tested on routine hemoglobin electrophoresis and alternative risk factors for ON in these patients.

Comparing the Risk of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Following Intra-Articular Corticosteroid and Hyaluronic Acid Injections

BACKGROUND

Although intra-articular corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are a cornerstone in the nonoperative management of hip pathology, recent reports have raised concerns that they may cause osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, these studies might have been limited by nonrepresentative patient samples. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of ONFH after CSI and compare it with the incidence in a similar patient population that received a non-CSI injection.

METHODS

This was a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study of patients in the MarketScan database who underwent an intra-articular hip injection from 2007 to 2017. Patients receiving hip CSIs were matched 4:1 with patients receiving hip hyaluronic acid injections (HAIs) based on age, sex, geographic region, comorbidities, type of hip pathology, injection year, and baseline and follow-up time using propensity scores. The patients' first injections were identified, and the time to development of ONFH was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional-hazards models. Patients with a history of osteonecrosis or those who received both types of injections were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 3,710 patients undergoing intra-articular hip injection were included (2,968 CSIs and 742 HAIs; mean [standard deviation] age, 53.1 [9.2] years; 55.4% men). All baseline factors were successfully matched between the groups (all p > 0.57). The estimated cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of ONFH for CSI and HAI patients was 2.4% (1.8% to 3.1%) versus 2.1% (1.1% to 3.5%) at 1 year and 2.9% (2.2% to 3.7%) versus 3.0% (1.7% to 4.8%) at 2 years (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.84; p = 0.88). The results held across a range of sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ONFH after intra-articular hip injection was similar between patients who received CSIs and those who received HAIs. Although this study could not determine whether intra-articular injections themselves (regardless of the drug that was used) lead to ONFH, the results suggest that ONFH after CSI often may be due, in part, to the natural course of the underlying disease. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively answer this question; in the interim, clinicians may be reassured that they may continue judicious use of CSIs as clinically indicated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.