Spontaneous cranial bone regeneration following craniectomy for traumatic brain injury in a pregnant woman: A case report

Bone Regeneration and Polyetheretherketone Implants in Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Neurosurgery: A Multidisciplinary Study

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in the last few years has emerged as an exceedingly promising material for craniofacial defects due to its biocompatibility and mechanical properties. However, its utilization remains controversial due to its inertness and low osteoinductivity. This study aimed to investigate the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing maxillo-facial and neurosurgical procedures with PEEK implants. The focus is on evaluating bone regrowth on the surface and edges of the implant, periosteal reactions, and implant positioning. A retrospective analysis of 12 maxillo-facial surgery patients and 10 neurosurgery patients who received PEEK implants was conducted. CT scans performed at least one year post operation were examined for bone regrowth, periosteal reactions, and implant positioning. In maxillo-facial cases, the analysis included mandibular angle and fronto-orbital reconstruction, while neurosurgical cases involved cranioplasty. In maxillofacial surgery, 11 out of 12 patients showed radiological evidence of bone regrowth around PEEK implants, with favorable outcomes observed in craniofacial reconstruction. In neurosurgery, 9 out of 10 patients exhibited minimal or none bone regrowth, while one case demonstrated notable bone regeneration beneath the PEEK implant interface. The study highlights the importance of implant design and patient-specific factors in achieving successful outcomes, providing valuable insights for future implant-based procedures.

Biomaterials for Regenerative Cranioplasty: Current State of Clinical Application and Future Challenges

Acquired cranial defects are a prevalent condition in neurosurgery and call for cranioplasty, where the missing or defective cranium is replaced by an implant. Nevertheless, the biomaterials in current clinical applications are hardly exempt from long-term safety and comfort concerns. An appealing solution is regenerative cranioplasty, where biomaterials with/without cells and bioactive molecules are applied to induce the regeneration of the cranium and ultimately repair the cranial defects. This review examines the current state of research, development, and translational application of regenerative cranioplasty biomaterials and discusses the efforts required in future research. The first section briefly introduced the regenerative capacity of the cranium, including the spontaneous bone regeneration bioactivities and the presence of pluripotent skeletal stem cells in the cranial suture. Then, three major types of biomaterials for regenerative cranioplasty, namely the calcium phosphate/titanium (CaP/Ti) composites, mineralised collagen, and 3D-printed polycaprolactone (PCL) composites, are reviewed for their composition, material properties, and findings from clinical trials. The third part discusses perspectives on future research and development of regenerative cranioplasty biomaterials, with a considerable portion based on issues identified in clinical trials. This review aims to facilitate the development of biomaterials that ultimately contribute to a safer and more effective healing of cranial defects.

Spontaneous Reossification Following Craniectomy in a Pediatric Patient

Spontaneous reossification following a cranial defect is described by only a few case reports. A 6-month-old male with epidural hematoma underwent decompressive craniotomy, subsequently complicated by scalp abscess requiring removal of the bone flap. On serial outpatient follow-up, the patient demonstrated near-complete resolution of cranial defect over the course of 18 months, thus deferring the need for future cranioplasty. Prior articles have identified this occurrence in children and young adults; however, the present case is the first to report of this phenomenon in an infant less than 1 year of age. A brief review of the literature is provided with the proposed physiologic underpinning for the spontaneous reossification observed. While prior studies propose that recranialization is mediated by contact with the dura mater and pericranium, new investigations suggest that calvarial bone repair is also mediated by stem cells from the suture mesenchyme.

Extensive skull ossification after decompressive craniectomy in an elderly patient: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

After severe traumatic brain injury, patients often present with signs of increased intracranial hypertension and partially require decompressive craniectomies. Artificial materials are usually required to repair skull defects and spontaneous skull ossification is rarely observed in adults.

PATIENT CONCERNS

This study reported a 64-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with a coma due to a traffic accident.

DIAGNOSIS

Emergency computed tomography (CT) examination upon admission showed a left temporo-occipital epidural hematoma with a cerebral hernia and skull fracture.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent urgent craniotomy for hematoma removal and decompression under general anesthesia. The patient was discharged after 1 month of treatment.

OUTCOMES

The patient returned to the hospital for skull repair 145 days after the craniotomy. Pre-operative CT showed island skull regeneration in the skull defect area; therefore, skull repair was postponed after clinical evaluation. Regular follow-up is required. Twenty-three months after surgery, head CT showed that the new skull had completely covered the defect area.

LESSON

We collected other 11 similar cases of spontaneous human skull regeneration in a literature search to analyze the possible factors impacting skull regeneration. The analysis of the cases indicated that maintaining the integrity of the periosteum, dura, and blood vessels during craniotomy may play an important role in skull regeneration. Skull regeneration predominantly occurs in young patients with rapid growth and development; therefore, an appropriate postponement of the cranioplasty time under close monitoring could be considered for young patients with skull defects.