Current status and advances in management of early breast cancer

Personal history of irradiation and risk of breast cancer: A Mendelian randomisation study

Background

Studies on the relationship between personal history of irradiation and breast cancer have been reported for a long time. Still, epidemiological studies have not been conclusive, and the causal relationship is unclear. To address this issue, we employed Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis to examine the association between individual radiation exposure history and breast cancer.

Methods

We used a series of quality control methods to select single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) closely related to exposure. Meanwhile, several analysis methods were used to analyse the sample data to make the conclusion more reliable. To evaluate the horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneity and stability of SNPs for breast cancer, the MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q test and 'leave one' sensitivity analysis were used. Finally, the outlier variation determined by the Mendelian Randomisation Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier test is gradually eliminated to reduce the influence of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy.

Results

After implementing rigorous quality control procedures, we carefully chose 102 qualified instrumental variables closely associated with the selected exposure for sensitivity analysis. This was conducted to evaluate the heterogeneity, level multiplicity, and stability of SNPs in the context of personal radiation history and its correlation with breast cancer. The results of the inverse variance weighted method analysis revealed a positive correlation between personal radiation and a heightened risk of breast cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.30-1.77). We also validated on another data set; the results were similar (OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.27-1.81). Furthermore, the findings from the sensitivity analysis were consistent. At the genetic level, our research demonstrated that personal radiation exposure is associated with an elevated risk of breast cancer.

Conclusions

Using genetic data provides evidence and strengthens the causal link that personal radiation causes breast cancer.

Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPPA) promotes breast cancer progression

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in females and poses a significant health threat to women. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPPA) is highly expressed in pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) tissues. In this study, we investigated the functional role of PAPPA in regulating the malignant phenotype of breast cancer. We first examined the expression level of PAPPA in PABC tissue and breast cancer cell lines using quantitative real-time polymerase-chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blot. Next, the functional role of PAPPA in breast cancer cells was validated by overexpression and knockdown experiments. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) proliferation assay, 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation assay, wound healing and transwell invasion assay were used to examine cell proliferation, migration, and invasion ability. We further identified the microRNA target regulating PAPPA and studied its functional role. Finally, we examined the impact of PAPPA on the tumorigenesis and metastasis of breast cancer in mice model. Our study revealed that PAPPA was upregulated in PABC tissues and breast cancer cells. Overexpression of PAPPA promoted cell proliferation, motility, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). We further identified miR-497-5p as a negative regulator of PAPPA, which suppressed cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and EMT in breast cancer cells. We also validated the oncogenic role of PAPPA in the mouse xenograft model. Collectively, our study suggests that PAPPA is an oncogenic protein highly expressed in PABC tissues and promotes breast cancer progression, which could serve as a novel therapeutic target for breast cancer.

Cytotoxicity of synthetic derivatives against breast cancer and multi-drug resistant breast cancer cell lines: a literature-based perspective study

Cancer is the second most killer worldwide causing millions of people to lose their lives every year. In the case of women, breast cancer takes away the highest proportion of mortality rate than other cancers. Due to the mutation and resistance-building capacity of different breast cancer cell lines against conventional therapies, this death rate is on the verge of growth. New effective therapeutic compounds and treatment method is the best way to look out for in this critical time. For instance, new synthetic derivatives/ analogues synthesized from different compounds can be a ray of hope. Numerous synthetic compounds have been seen enhancing the apoptosis and autophagic pathway that directly exerts cytotoxicity towards different breast cancer cell lines. To cease the ever-growing resistance of multi-drug resistant cells against anti-breast cancer drugs (Doxorubicin, verapamil, tamoxifen) synthetic compounds may play a vital role by increasing effectivity, showing synergistic action. Many recent and previous studies have reported that synthetic derivatives hold potentials as an effective anti-breast cancer agent as they show great cytotoxicity towards cancer cells, thus can be used even vastly in the future in the field of breast cancer treatment. This review aims to identify the anti-breast cancer properties of several synthetic derivatives against different breast cancer and multi-drug-resistant breast cancer cell lines with their reported mechanism of action and effectivity.

Identification of Immune-Related Risk Characteristics and Prognostic Value of Immunophenotyping in TNBC

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is not sensitive to targeted therapy with HER-2 monoclonal antibody and endocrine therapy due to lack of ER, PR, and HER-2 receptors. TNBC is a breast cancer subtype with the worst prognosis and the highest mortality rate compared with other subtypes. Materials and Methods: Breast cancer-related data were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, and 116 cases of triple-negative breast cancer were identified from the data. GSE31519 dataset was retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, comprising a total of 68 cases with TNBC. Survival analysis was performed based on immune score, infiltration score and mutation score to explore differences in prognosis of different immune types. Analysis of differentially expressed genes was conducted and GSEA analysis based on these genes was conducted to explore the potential mechanism. Results: The findings showed that comprehensive immune typing is highly effective and accurate in assessing prognosis of TNBC patients. Analysis showed that MMP9, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11 and CD7 are key genes that may affect immune typing of TNBC patients and play an important role in prediction of prognosis in TNBC patients. Conclusion: The current study presents an evaluation system based on immunophenotyping, which provides a more accurate prognostic evaluation tool for TNBC patients. Differentially expressed genes can be targeted to improve treatment of TNBC.

Cancer Stem Cells: Acquisition, Characteristics, Therapeutic Implications, Targeting Strategies and Future Prospects

Since last two decades, the major cancer research has focused on understanding the characteristic properties and mechanism of formation of Cancer stem cells (CSCs), due to their ability to initiate tumor growth, self-renewal property and multi-drug resistance. The discovery of the mechanism of acquisition of stem-like properties by carcinoma cells via epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has paved a way towards a deeper understanding of CSCs and presented a possible avenue for the development of therapeutic strategies. In spite of years of research, various challenges, such as identification of CSC subpopulation, lack of appropriate experimental models, targeting cancer cells and CSCs specifically without harming normal cells, are being faced while dealing with CSCs. Here, we discuss the biology and characteristics of CSCs, mode of acquisition of stemness (via EMT) and development of multi-drug resistance, the role of tumor niche, the process of dissemination and metastasis, therapeutic implications of CSCs and necessity of targeting them. We emphasise various strategies being developed to specifically target CSCs, including those targeting biomarkers, key pathways and microenvironment. Finally, we focus on the challenges that need to be subdued and propose the aspects that need to be addressed in future studies in order to broaden the understanding of CSCs and develop novel strategies to eradicate them in clinical applications. Graphical Abstract Cancer Stem Cells(CSCs) have gained much attention in the last few decades due to their ability to initiate tumor growth and, self-renewal property and multi-drug resistance. Here, we represent the CSC model of cancer, Characteristics of CSCs, acquisition of stemness and metastatic dissemination of cancer, Therapeutic implications of CSCs and Various strategies being employed to target and eradicate CSCs.

Which simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique is dosimetrically superior in the treatment of breast cancer; volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or fixed field (ff) IMRT?

Background and purpose

To determine which concomitant boost technique is dosimetrically superior in the treatment of breast cancer; volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or fixed field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (ff-IMRT).

Materials and methods

In total, 30 breast patients were re-planned with both VMAT and fixed field concomitant boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. A hybrid technique was used delivering 80% of the dose through tangential beams and 20% through an integrated boost. A two-tailed t-test sample for means was used to compare the dosimetric differences between the techniques.

Results

Maximum dose was statistically lower for VMAT; 103·2 versus 103·7% for ff-IMRT along with statistically lower V2 Gy doses to the contralateral lung (0·7 versus 1·6%) and heart for both left- (19·0%/22·6%), and right- (5·5%/8·8%) sided patients, respectively. ff-IMRT boasted significantly lower ipsilateral lung V20, V18 and V10 Gy (7·9/8·6/13·1 versus 8·1/8·8/13·4%) than VMAT, respectively. No differences were found with minimum coverage, mean dose and V5 Gy to all organs at risk (OARs).

Conclusion

VMAT and ff-IMRT techniques demonstrate excellent target coverage and OAR sparing facilitated by the hybrid planning technique and deep inspiration breath hold. There is no obvious dosimetrically superior option between the two techniques. Reduced treatment times with VMAT make it more desirable to implement clinically.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer

Intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) as a treatment for breast cancer is a relatively new technique that is designed to be a replacement for whole breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in selected women suitable for breast-conserving therapy. This article reviews twelve reasons for the use of the technique, with a particular emphasis on targeted intra-operative radiotherapy (TARGIT) which uses X-rays generated from a portable device within the operating theatre immediately after the breast tumour (and surrounding margin of healthy tissue) has been removed. The delivery of a single fraction of radiotherapy directly to the tumour bed at the time of surgery, with the capability of adding EBRT at a later date if required (risk-adaptive technique) is discussed in light of recent results from a large multinational randomised controlled trial comparing TARGIT with EBRT. The technique avoids irradiation of normal tissues such as skin, heart, lungs, ribs and spine, and has been shown to improve cosmetic outcome when compared with EBRT. Beneficial aspects to both institutional and societal economics are discussed, together with evidence demonstrating excellent patient satisfaction and quality of life. There is a discussion of the published evidence regarding the use of IORT twice in the same breast (for new primary cancers) and in patients who would never be considered for EBRT because of their special circumstances (such as the frail, the elderly, or those with collagen vascular disease). Finally, there is a discussion of the role of the TARGIT Academy in developing and sustaining high standards in the use of the technique.

Anti-breast cancer activity of heteroaryl chalcone derivatives

In an attempt to develop effective anticancer therapeutics, a new series of heteroaryl chalcone compounds were designed, synthesized, and examined for their antiproliferative effects on two breast cancer cell lines and one matching non-cancer breast cell line. The structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis suggested that the compounds derived from thiophene chalcones (6-17) exhibited generally better antiproliferative activity than those derived from bioisoteric replacement of furan chalcones (18-29) on MDA-MB231 breast cancer cells. In contrast, the compounds derived from furan chalcones showed generally better antiproliferative activity on MDA-MB468 breast cancer cells. Among 24 compounds examined, compounds 21 and 23 showed significantly improved antiproliferative activity against MDA-MB231 and MDA-MB468 cancer cells. However, compound 23 ((E)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(5-(4-methoxyphenyl)furan-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one) is considered to be most desirable among this series, since its antiproliferative activity was 3 to 7-fold higher on cancer than non-cancer cells. Compound 23 showed not only more effective activity than the widely prescribed cisplatin on cancer cells, but it also showed differential antiproliferative activity against cancer cells, a property that is not shown with cisplatin. If this property shown in cell culture stands in vivo test, compound 23 can be an effective and safe anticancer drug.