How do you diagnose appendicitis? An international evaluation of methods

A Review of History and Challenges of Evidence-Based Pediatric Surgery

PURPOSE

Evidence-based pediatric surgery (EBPS) refers to the use of the best available evidence in making personalized decisions concerning the management of each pediatric surgical patient. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review on past and present evidence-based clinical decision, and challenges in pediatric surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted according to a set of criteria in PubMed for historical and current peer-reviewed studies regarding EBPS.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five full-text published articles focusing on EPBS findings over the past 25 years were included. The rarity of many congenital anomalies, the inability to establish multicenter collaborations, the failure to perform double-blinded studies in children, the pediatric surgeons' reluctance to perform ethically unacceptable sham operations and their skepticism shown in accepting and implementing the documented results instead of applying their personal clinical practice methods and surgical techniques are among problems that hamper the accomplishment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

CONCLUSIONS

RCTs remain limited in clinical pediatric surgery practice due to problems in the design and publication of these trials. Moreover, skepticism exists regarding acceptance and implementation of the documented results of RCTs. Notwithstanding, pediatric surgeons must establish evidence-based centers in order to increase the number of well-designed RCTs, properly evaluate clinical research, make effective evidence-based clinical decisions and develop high-quality of pediatric surgeries care in the future.

Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Project for Suspected Appendicitis

Introduction:

Considerable variability exists in the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis, affecting both quality and costs of care. This prospective cohort study aimed to decrease unnecessary radiological investigations, standardize radiological imaging, avoid unnecessary hospital admissions, and decrease our institution rate of negative appendectomy.

Methods:

A multidisciplinary appendicitis care pathway was implemented. This pathway involved the use of the Pediatric Appendicitis Score, standardization of ultrasound reporting, and risk stratification to determine patient disposition. Patients were prospectively enrolled in the pathway and compared a preimplementation retrospective cohort.

Results:

We included 235 patients in this study that took place between February 2017 and January 2018. An 88.5% pathway adherence rate for appropriate referral for ultrasounds, an 84% compliance rate for correct risk stratification, and the need for a surgical consult were achieved. After implementation, standardization of ultrasound (U/S) reporting increased from 0% to 78%. The rate of computed tomography utilization decreased from 7.3% to 4.7%. An appendectomy was completed in 68 (29%) of patients. There was only 1 (1.5%) negative appendectomy, compared to the prepathway institutional negative appendectomy rate of 4%.

Conclusion:

The implementation of a standardized, evidence-based, appendicitis care pathway has the potential to improve quality of care by reducing negative appendectomies, unnecessary computed tomography scans, and unnecessary hospital admissions. The participation of the emergency and diagnostic imaging departments is critical to the successful implementation of this quality improvement measure. This simple, effective model can be easily implemented at other centers to improve the care of children.

[Management of acute appendicitis : Evidence for prompt surgical treatment?]

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is a common disease which requires immediate surgical treatment of the focus of inflammation. So far there are no reliable data on how much time can pass between hospitalization, indications for surgery and initiating surgery without an increased risk of morbidity and mortality for the patient.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate how much time can lapse between admission and initiation of surgery for acute appendicitis while still providing patient safety and no increase in complication rates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis investigated the management of all patients who underwent appendectomy under the suspicion of acute appendicitis. Besides the time span between hospital admittance and beginning of the operation (admission to incision time, AIT), anamnestic, diagnostic, technical and perioperative data were assessed and statistically analyzed (mean ± SD).

RESULTS

From January 2008 to April 2013 a total of 655 patients underwent appendectomy. The mean AIT was 7 h and the rate of negative appendectomy was 9.8 %. The mean hospitalization period was 5.9 ± 8.7 days with a postoperative stay of 5.2 ± 7.1 days. A comparison of the subgroups stratified by increasing AIT showed that there was no increased probability for perforation or postoperative complications with an AIT of up to 8 h.

DISCUSSION

This retrospective cohort study showed that appendectomy should be performed within the first 8 h after hospitalization of the patient.

How to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound first

Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common abdominal emergency with a lifetime prevalence of about 7 %. As the clinical diagnosis of AA remains a challenge to emergency physicians and surgeons, imaging modalities have gained major importance in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected AA in order to keep both the negative appendectomy rate and the perforation rate low. Introduced in 1986, graded-compression ultrasound (US) has well-established direct and indirect signs for diagnosing AA. In our opinion, US should be the first-line imaging modality, as graded-compression US has excellent specificity both in the paediatric and adult patient populations. As US sensitivity is limited, and non-diagnostic US examinations with non-visualization of the appendix are more a rule than an exception, diagnostic strategies and algorithms after non-diagnostic US should focus on clinical reassessment and complementary imaging with MRI/CT if indicated. Accordingly, both ionizing radiation to our patients and cost of pre-therapeutic diagnosis of AA will be low, with low negative appendectomy and perforation rates.

Main Messages

• Ultrasound (US) should be the first imaging modality for diagnosing acute appendicitis (AA).

• Primary US for AA diagnosis will decrease ionizing radiation and cost.

• Sensitivity of US to diagnose AA is lower than of CT/MRI.

• Non-visualization of the appendix should lead to clinical reassessment.

• Complementary MRI or CT may be performed if diagnosis remains unclear.

Diagnostic Imaging of Appendicitis With Supplementation by Transabdominal and Transvaginal Sonography

Acute appendicitis is a condition that can affect any member of the population. Without timely treatment there is a high likelihood of rupture leading to peritonitis, and early diagnosis is imperative to obtaining treatment. Sonography can be used without fear of radiation exposure to the patient and with relatively little discomfort, ideal for pediatric patients. It can also be used with little patient preparation, with the possibility of a more rapid diagnosis than other imaging modalities. For patients presenting with atypical symptoms, sonography may be used to increase diagnostic accuracy, which will lead to a drop in the surgical removal rate of a healthy appendix. When diagnostic criteria are met, sonography results can be correlated with the patient’s blood test and clinical symptoms to make a positive diagnosis. The addition of the transvaginal approach for female patients has further increased the rate of success of diagnosing acute appendicitis, so that appropriate emergent surgery can be done.