Clinically cN0 breast cancer in elderly: What surgery?

Survival benefit from axillary surgery in patients aged 70 years or older with clinically node-negative breast cancer: A population-based propensity-score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Older patients with breast cancer have good prognosis and most die from diseases other than breast cancer. Previous studies suggested that the surgical extent in older patients could be reduced. We aimed to compare survival outcomes in patients aged ≥70 years with clinically node-negative breast cancer, based on whether axillary surgery was performed.

METHODS

A total of 2,995 patients with breast cancer aged ≥70 years who underwent breast surgery were included in the Korean Breast Cancer Registry. Patients were classified into two groups according to the performance of axillary surgery. We used propensity score matching for demographic and treatment factors to minimize selection bias. We compared the 5-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS).

RESULTS

Among 708 patients after 3:1 propensity score matching, 531 underwent breast surgery with axillary surgery and 177 underwent breast surgery alone. Of all patients, 51.7% had T1 stage, and 73.2% underwent mastectomy. Approximately 31.2% of patients received chemotherapy. Among patients who did not undergo axillary surgery, the 5-year OS and BCSS rates were 85.2% and 96.7%, respectively. The hazard ratio of axillary surgery for OS was 0.943 (95% confidence interval 0.652-1.365, p = 0.757), indicating no significant difference between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that axillary surgery in a matched cohort of older patients with breast cancer and clinically negative nodes does not provide a survival benefit compared to patients undergoing breast surgery alone. These findings suggest that axillary surgery may be safely omitted in a select group of patients aged ≥70 years with clinically node-negative cancer. Further studies are needed to identify potential candidates for omitting axillary surgery.

Surgery in the Older Patient with Breast Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast cancer incidence and mortality increase with age. Older patients (≥ 70) are often excluded from studies. Due to multiple factors, it is unclear whether this population is best-treated using standard guidelines. Here, we review surgical management in older women with breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Geriatric assessments can guide treatment recommendations and aid in predicting survival and quality of life. Surgery remains a principal component of breast cancer treatment in older patients, though differences exist compared with younger women, including higher mastectomy rates and evidence-based support of omission of post-lumpectomy radiation or axillary dissection in subsets of patients. In those forgoing surgical management, there is increased use of endocrine therapy. Hospice is also a valuable element of end-of-life care. Physicians should utilize geriatric assessment to make treatment recommendations for older breast cancer patients, including omission of radiation therapy, alterations to standard surgeries, or enrollment in hospice care.

Association of LN Evaluation with Survival in Women Aged 70 Years or Older With Clinically Node-Negative Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Some suggest that lymph node (LN) evaluation not be performed routinely in women aged ≥70 years with clinically (c) LN-negative (-), hormone receptor (HR)-positive (+) breast cancer. We sought to determine the association of omission of LN evaluation on survival.

METHODS

Patients who met the above criteria and were diagnosed from 2004 to 2012 were identified in the NCDB and SEER databases. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were determined.

RESULTS

Using the NCDB, we identified 157,584 cLN- HR+ patients aged ≥70 years in whom survival and LN evaluation data were available. A total of 126,638 patients (80.2%) had regional LN surgery. With a median follow-up of 41.6 months, there was a significant difference in OS between those who had LN evaluation and those who did not (median OS: 100.5 vs. 70.9 months, respectively, p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient age, race, insurance, income, comorbidities, tumor characteristics and treatment, patients who had undergone LN evaluation still had a lower hazard rate for death than those who had not (hazard ratio = 0.633; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.613-0.654, p < 0.001). We then did a parallel analysis using SEER data that showed LN evaluation was associated with a lower hazard rate for both BCSS (hazard ratio = 0.452; 95% CI 0.427-0.479, p < 0.001) and non-BCSS (hazard ratio = 0.465; 95% CI 0.447-0.482, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Roughly 20% of patients older than aged 70 years with cLN-, HR+ breast cancer did not have LN evaluation. Those who did had better OS controlling for sociodemographic, pathologic, and treatment variables; however, this may be due to patient selection.