Colonic diverticulitis in chemotherapy patients: should operative indications change? A retrospective cohort study

Intra-abdominal infections survival guide: a position statement by the Global Alliance For Infections In Surgery

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hospital settings worldwide. The cornerstones of IAI management include rapid, accurate diagnostics; timely, adequate source control; appropriate, short-duration antimicrobial therapy administered according to the principles of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and antimicrobial stewardship; and hemodynamic and organ functional support with intravenous fluid and adjunctive vasopressor agents for critical illness (sepsis/organ dysfunction or septic shock after correction of hypovolemia). In patients with IAIs, a personalized approach is crucial to optimize outcomes and should be based on multiple aspects that require careful clinical assessment. The anatomic extent of infection, the presumed pathogens involved and risk factors for antimicrobial resistance, the origin and extent of the infection, the patient's clinical condition, and the host's immune status should be assessed continuously to optimize the management of patients with complicated IAIs.

Outcomes of initially nonoperative management of diverticulitis with abscess formation in immunosuppressed patients. DIPLICAB study COLLABORATIVE group

AIM

Management of diverticulitis with abscess formation in immunosuppressed patients (IMS) remains unclear. The main objective of the study was to assess short- and long-term outcomes between IMS and immunocompetent patients (IC). The secondary aim was to identify risk factors for emergency surgery.

METHODS

A nationwide retrospective cohort study was performed at 29 Spanish referral centres between 2015-2019 including consecutive patients with first episode of diverticulitis classified as modified Hinchey Ib or II. IMS included immunosuppressive therapy, biologic therapy, malignant neoplasm with active chemotherapy and chronic steroid therapy. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors to emergency surgery in IMS.

RESULTS

A total of 1395 patients were included; 118 IMS and 1277 IC. There were no significant differences in emergency surgery between IMS and IC (19.5% and 13.5%, p = 0.075) but IMS was associated with higher mortality (15.1% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001). Similar recurrent episodes were found between IMS and IC (28% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.963). Following multivariate analysis, immunosuppressive treatment, p = 0.002; OR: 3.35 (1.57-7.15), free gas bubbles, p < 0.001; OR: 2.91 (2.01-4.21), Hinchey II, p = 0.002; OR: 1.88 (1.26-2.83), use of morphine, p < 0.001; OR: 3.08 (1.98-4.80), abscess size ≥5 cm, p = 0.001; OR: 1.97 (1.33-2.93) and leucocytosis at third day, p < 0.001; OR: 1.001 (1.001-1.002) were independently associated with emergency surgery in IMS.

CONCLUSION

Nonoperative management in IMS has been shown to be safe with similar treatment failure than IC. IMS presented higher mortality in emergency surgery and similar rate of recurrent diverticulitis than IC. Identifying risk factors to emergency surgery may anticipate emergency surgery.

German guideline diverticular disease/diverticulitis: Part I: Methods, pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical characteristics (definitions), natural course, diagnosis and classification

Diverticulosis and diverticular disease are ranked among the most common gastroenterological diseases and conditions. While for many years diverticulitis was found to be mainly an event occurring in the elder population, more recent work in epidemiology demonstrates increasing frequency in younger subjects. In addition, there is a noticeable trend towards more complicated disease. This may explain the significant increase in hospitalisations observed in recent years. It is not a surprise that the number of scientific studies addressing the clinical and socioeconomic consequences in the field is increasing. As a result, diagnosis and conservative as well as surgical management have changed in recent years. Diverticulosis, diverticular disease and diverticulitis are a complex entity and apparently an interdisciplinary challenge. To meet theses considerations the German Societies for Gastroenterology and Visceral Surgery decided to create joint guidelines addressing all aspects in a truely interdisciplinary fashion. The aim of the guideline is to summarise and to evaluate the current state of knowledge on diverticulosis and diverticular disease and to develop statements as well as recommendations to all physicians involved in the management of patients with diverticular disease.

Surgical management in immunosuppressed patients with sigmoid diverticulitis, still a challenge: a single-center observational study

PURPOSE

The question of whether immunosuppressed (IS) patients should be offered elective sigmoidectomy following a single episode of diverticulitis is controversial. We intended to examine the perioperative outcome of IS and immunocompetent (IC) patients after sigmoid resection.

METHODS

A single institutional cohort study was conducted, including all surgically treated patients with sigmoid diverticulitis between 2004 and 2021. IS and IC patients were further subdivided into emergency and elective cases. Morbidity and mortality in both groups and factors influencing surgical outcome were examined using uni- and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 281 patients were included in the final analysis. Emergency surgery was performed on 98 patients while 183 patients underwent elective sigmoid resection. Emergency sigmoidectomy demonstrates significantly higher morbidity and mortality rates in IS patients as compared to IC patients (81.81% vs. 42.1%; p = 0.001, respectively 27.27% vs. 3.94%; p = 0.004), while major morbidity and mortality was similar in both groups in the elective setting (IS: 23.52% vs. IC: 13.85%; p = 0.488, respectively IS: 5.88% vs. IC: 0%; p = 1). On multivariate regression analysis for major postoperative morbidity, ASA score [OR 1.837; (95% CI 1.166-2.894); p = 0.009] and emergency surgery under immunosuppression [OR 3.065; (95% CI 1.128-8.326); p = 0.028] were significant. In-hospital mortality was significantly related to age [OR 1.139; (95% CI 1.012-1.282); p = 0.031], preoperative CRP count [OR 1.137; (95% CI 1.028-1.259); p = 0.013], and immunosuppression [OR 35.246; (95% CI 1.923-646.176), p = 0.016] on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis in immunocompromised patients demonstrates higher efficacy and safety when compared to sigmoid resection in the emergency setting.

Special Situations in the Management of Diverticular Disease

Diverticular disease affects a large percentage of the US population, affecting over 30% among those older than 45 years old. It is responsible for ∼300,000 hospitalizations per year in the United States and can lead to serious complications such as hemorrhage, obstruction, abscess, fistulae, or bowel perforation. 2 It is an extremely common reason for emergency room and outpatient visits and evaluations by general and colorectal surgeons. In the US, patients usually present with sigmoid diverticulitis in the setting of a normal immune system so surgeons will follow well-established practice guidelines for treatment. However, there may be special circumstances in which the management of diverticulitis is not as straightforward. In this article, we will address patients who present with multifocal disease, giant colonic diverticulum, right-sided diverticulitis, and diverticulitis in the setting of immunosuppression and hopefully provide guidance for treatment in these special circumstances.

The Indications for and Timing of Surgery for Diverticular Disease

BACKGROUND

Diverticular disease is one of the more common abdominal disorders. In 2016, approximately 130 000 patients received inpatient treatment for diverticular disease in Germany. The disease has a number of subtypes, each of which has an appropriate treatment. In this article, we present the current surgical indications and optimal timing of surgery for diverticular disease.

METHODS

This review is based on publications that were retrieved by an extensive, selective search in Medline and the Cochrane Library (1998-2018) for studies and guidelines with information on the indications for surgery in diverticular disease.

RESULTS

Studies of evidence grades 2 to 4 were available. Patients receiving a diagnosis of freely perforated diverticulitis and peritonitis (Classification of Diverticular Disease [CDD] type 2c) should be operated on at once. Covered perforated diverticulitis with a macroabscess (>1 cm, CDD type 2b) may be an indication for elective surgery after successful conservative treatment. New evidence from a randomized, controlled trial suggests that elective surgery should also be considered for patients with chronic recurrent diverticulitis (CDD type 3b). The decisive factor in such cases is the impairment of the quality of life for the individual patient. Elective surgery is indicated in chronic recurrent diverticulitis with complications (fistulae, stenoses). Asymptomatic diverticulosis (CDD type 0) and uncomplicated diverticulitis (CDD type 1) are not surgical indications. Likewise, in diverticular hemorrhage (CDD type 4), surgery is only indicated in exceptional cases, when conservative treatment fails.

CONCLUSION

The surgical indication and the proper timing of surgery depend on the type of disease that is present. Future studies should more thoroughly investigate the effect of surgery on the quality of life in patients with the various types of diverticular disease.

Operative management of colonic diverticular disease in the setting of immunosuppression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressed patients with diverticular disease are at higher risk of postoperative complications, however reported rates have varied. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients undergoing surgery for diverticular disease.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched. Articles were included if they compared immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients undergoing surgery for diverticular disease.

RESULTS

From 204 citations, 11 studies with 2,977 immunosuppressed patients and 780,630 immunocompetent patients were included. Mortality was greater in immunosuppressed patients compared to immunocompetent patients for emergent surgery (RR 1.91, 95%CI 1.24-2.95, p < 0.01), but not elective surgery (RR 1.70, 95%CI 0.14-20.47, p = 0.68). Morbidity was greater in immunosuppressed patients compared to immunocompetent patients for elective surgery (RR 2.18, 95%CI 1.02-4.65, p = 0.04), but not emergent surgery (RR 1.40, 95%CI 0.68-2.90, p = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased consideration for elective operation may preclude the need for emergent surgery and the associated increase in postoperative mortality.

Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment of Diverticulitis

Diverticulitis is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder that is associated with significant morbidity and health care costs. Approximately 20% of patients with incident diverticulitis have at least 1 recurrence. Complications of diverticulitis, such as abdominal sepsis, are less likely to occur with subsequent events. Several risk factors, many of which are modifiable, have been identified including obesity, diet, and physical inactivity. Diet and lifestyle factors could affect risk of diverticulitis through their effects on the intestinal microbiome and inflammation. Preliminary studies have found that the composition and function of the gut microbiome differ between individuals with vs without diverticulitis. Genetic factors, as well as alterations in colonic neuromusculature, can also contribute to the development of diverticulitis. Less-aggressive and more-nuanced treatment strategies have been developed. Two multicenter, randomized trials of patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis found that antibiotics did not speed recovery or prevent subsequent complications. Elective surgical resection is no longer recommended solely based on number of recurrent events or young patient age and might not be necessary for some patients with diverticulitis complicated by abscess. Randomized trials of hemodynamically stable patients who require urgent surgery for acute, complicated diverticulitis that has not improved with antibiotics provide evidence to support primary anastomosis vs sigmoid colectomy with end colostomy. Despite these advances, more research is needed to increase our understanding of the pathogenesis of diverticulitis and to clarify treatment algorithms.

Management outcomes of diverticulitis and colitis in patients with active cancer

BACKGROUND

Little is reported in the literature on management strategies and outcomes in patients with an active cancer diagnosis who undergo emergent general surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate preoperative risk factors in both operative and non-operative management, as well as to describe the outcomes of colonic emergencies within a cancer patient population.

METHODS

A single institution cancer database was reviewed retrospectively to identify patients with an active cancer diagnosis who had an emergency general surgery consult placed for an acute colonic pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were included. Among these, 38 patients underwent operative and 49 underwent nonoperative management. There was a 71% rate of postoperative complications in the operative group; these patients were also more likely to require intensive care unit admission (P < .001), die during their hospitalization (P = .003), have a greater 30-day mortality (P = .001) and were less likely to be discharged to home (P < .001). No patients in the nonoperative group required admission to the intensive care unit, 3 of the 49 (6%) died during their hospitalization, and 75% of nonoperative patients were discharged to home.

CONCLUSION

When clinically appropriate, patients with active cancer who present with an acute colonic emergency can undergo nonoperative management safely. In contrast, patients undergoing operative management have a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality.

Is the Failure of Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage Predictable in Hinchey III Diverticulitis Management?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is an alternative to sigmoid resection in Hinchey III diverticulitis (generalized purulent peritonitis). The main limitation of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage is the higher rate of reoperation for persistent sepsis in comparison with sigmoid resection.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the current study was to identify risk factors for laparoscopic peritoneal lavage failure in patients who have Hinchey III diverticulitis.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective multicenter study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted in 3 clinical sites in France.

PATIENTS

From 2006 to 2015, all consecutive patients undergoing emergent surgery for diverticulitis were reviewed. All patients operated on with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for laparoscopically confirmed Hinchey III diverticulitis were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was laparoscopic peritoneal lavage failure, defined as reoperation or death at 30 postoperative days.

RESULTS

A series of 71 patients (43 men, mean age 58 ± 15 years) were operated on with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for Hinchey III diverticulitis. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage failed in 14 (20%) of them: 1 died and 13 underwent reoperations. No major complication (Dindo-Clavien score ≥3) occurred after reoperation. Immunosuppressive drugs (p = 0.01) and ASA grade ≥3 (p = 0.02) were associated with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage failure after univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified only immunosuppressive drug intake (steroids or chemotherapy for cancer) as an independent predictive factor. Mean length of stay was 14.9 days (5-67). At the end of the 30 first postoperative days, 12 (17%) patients had a stoma.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective nature and the small size of the cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight immunosuppressive drug intake as a major risk factor for laparoscopic peritoneal lavage failure in patients who have Hinchey III diverticulitis. Immunosuppression and severe comorbidities (ASA ≥3) should be considered when selecting a surgical option in patients with Hinchey III diverticulitis. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A423.

Outcomes of colonic diverticulitis according to the reason of immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to analyze the relationship between the different causes of immunosuppression (IMS) and diverticulitis.

METHODS

IMS patients admitted for colonic diverticulitis were included in the study. Patients were divided in 5 groups according to the reasons of IMS: group I, chronic corticosteroid therapy; group II, transplant patients; group III, malignant neoplasm disease; group IV, chronic renal failure; group V, others immunosuppressant treatment. Rate of emergency surgery, outcomes in terms of postoperative mortality, and recurrence rate after nonoperative management were analyzed according to the reason of IMS.

RESULTS

Emergency surgery was performed in 76 patients (39.3%). It was needed more frequently in group I. Overall, postoperative mortality was of 31.6% and recurrence rate after successful nonoperative management occurred in 30 patients (27.8%). No differences were observed among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of emergency surgery in IMS patients at the first episode of acute colonic diverticulitis is high. Elective surgery in IMS patients should be individually indicated according to persistence of symptoms or early recurrences.

Etiology and risk factors for colon diverticulum: Differences between Westerns and Easterns

Rectal diverticulum is defined as the sac-like pathological hernia that protrudes outside the intestinal wall. In recent years, the incidence of rectal diverticulum as revealed by autopsy has gradually increased. The development of colon diverticulum is related to anatomical factors, disorders of intestinal motor nerves, intestinal bacterial overgrowth and hormonal factors. In addition, the development of colon diverticulum is also affected by race, gender, environment, food styles and exercise. Colon diverticulum is different between Westerns and Easterns in terms of epidemiology and etiology. Previous studies have demonstrated that high fat diet and low fiber diet might be important in the onset of colon diverticulum. In this review, we will discuss the differences in etiology and risk factors for colon diverticulum between Westerns and Easterns.