1
|
Callan R, Loud E. Antibiotic stewardship in UK surgical departments: challenges and possible solutions. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2021; 82:1-6. [PMID: 33792383 DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2020.0692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Antibiotics are one of the most widely used classes of drugs within hospitals in the UK. They have a wide range of uses within all surgical specialties, both as preoperative prophylaxis and for treatment of acute surgical conditions. Antimicrobial resistance has increasingly been seen as a major issue, as the production of new antibiotics has decreased and overall use worldwide has increased. With the COVID-19 pandemic increasing concerns about antimicrobial resistance, there is an ever-increasing need for action. This article examines the particular challenges of antibiotic stewardship in surgical departments within the UK, and outlines possible solutions for improving adherence and reducing the risk of antimicrobial resistance in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rory Callan
- Department of General Surgery, Bedford Hospital, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Bedford, UK
| | - Emily Loud
- Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martzivanou EC, Psarras K, Monioudis P, Vamvakis K, Nikolaidou C, Geropoulos G, Pavlidis ET, Symeonidis N, Pavlidis TE. Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis: An Educative Intervention Significantly Increases Compliance. J Clin Med Res 2021; 13:170-176. [PMID: 33854657 PMCID: PMC8016525 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation of guidelines in daily clinical practice is often suboptimal, mainly due to doctors' poor compliance with them. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is many times administered in patients undergoing elective surgery without proper indication or for longer time than needed. Aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a simple intervention on the compliance of the medical staff with the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines concerning PAP administration. METHODS A prospective 3-month audit took place including routine surgical procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair and thyroidectomy). An intervention aiming to educate the medical staff was implemented. The intervention included the demonstration of a poster and the training of the medical staff over the guidelines. A re-audit recorded the changes in daily clinical practice. RESULTS The compliance rate regarding the number of PAP doses significantly increased from 0% before the intervention to 68.8% after the intervention for hernia repair and to 53.1% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The adherence rate in thyroidectomies increased from 25% to 50%, but without statistical significance. No significant difference was found for other parameters of PAP administration, namely the type of antibiotic used and the timing of the dose administration. Regarding secondary outcomes, hospitalization days were reduced, and cost of antibiotics was significantly decreased (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS A simple intervention intending to educate the medical staff was successful in achieving significant improvement on the compliance rate with the PAP guidelines, highlighting the importance of promoting adherence to the already existing, well-established guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eirini Chrysovalantou Martzivanou
- Second Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Corresponding Author: Eirini Chrysovalantou Martzivanou, Second Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Kyriakos Psarras
- Second Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Monioudis
- Second Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Christina Nikolaidou
- Second Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Geropoulos
- Thoracic Surgery Department, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Efstathios T. Pavlidis
- Second Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Symeonidis
- Second Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Theodoros E. Pavlidis
- Second Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hassan S, Chan V, Stevens J, Stupans I. Factors that influence adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines: a systematic review. Syst Rev 2021; 10:29. [PMID: 33453730 PMCID: PMC7811740 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01577-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the extensive research that has been conducted to date, practice often differs from established guidelines and will vary between individuals and organisations. It has been noted that the global uptake of local and international surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines is poor with limited research investigating factors that affect guideline adherence. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the reported barriers and enablers to the adherence of SAP guidelines. METHODS A search of the literature was performed using four electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed and SCOPUS) for articles published in the English language from January 1998 to December 2018. Articles were included if they were solely related to SAP and discussed the barriers or enablers to SAP guideline adherence. Articles that assessed the adherence to a range of infection control measures or discussed adherence to antibiotic treatment guidelines rather than SAP guidelines were excluded from this review. Barriers and enablers were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. RESULTS A total of 1489 papers were originally retrieved, with 48 papers meeting the eligibility criteria. Barriers and enablers were mapped to 11 out of 14 TDF domains: knowledge, skills, social/professional role and identity, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, reinforcement, memory, attention and decision processes, environmental context and resources, social influences, emotion and behavioural regulation. Barriers were further categorised into personal or organisational barriers, while enablers were arranged under commonly trialled interventions. CONCLUSIONS There are numerous factors that can determine the uptake of SAP guidelines. An identification and understanding of these factors at a local level is required to develop tailored interventions to enhance guideline adherence. Interventions, when used in combination, can be considered as a means of improving guideline use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Hassan
- Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Vincent Chan
- Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Stevens
- Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.,School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ieva Stupans
- Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pelullo CP, Pepe A, Napolitano F, Coppola N, Di Giuseppe G. Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis: Knowledge and Attitudes among Resident Physicians in Italy. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020; 9:antibiotics9060357. [PMID: 32630396 PMCID: PMC7345233 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9060357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate knowledge and attitudes on the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) among surgery and anesthesiology resident physicians in Italy. A Web-based national survey of Italian surgery and anesthesiology resident physicians was conducted between March 2018 and January 2019. Participants completed a questionnaire and three case vignettes for each specialty. Of the 1282 resident physicians selected, 466 completed the online questionnaire for a response rate of 36.3%. More than half of the sample were female (52.9%), and the mean age was 30 years. A total of 36.3% of the participants had an adequate knowledge score about PAP. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that resident physicians in general surgery compared to those in anesthesiology, those who agreed that PAP must be performed within 60 min before surgical incision, and those who were aware regarding the availability about the availability of national guidelines on PAP, were significantly more likely to have adequate knowledge about PAP. Moreover, 14% of participants were very concerned that patients may contract surgical site infections during hospitalization. These findings should be useful to promote educational intervention specifically targeted for surgery and anesthesiology resident physicians organizing training course on PAP, to improve the correct antibiotic use and to prevent healthcare-associated infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Concetta Paola Pelullo
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80135 Naples, Italy; (C.P.P.); (A.P.); (F.N.)
| | - Angela Pepe
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80135 Naples, Italy; (C.P.P.); (A.P.); (F.N.)
| | - Francesco Napolitano
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80135 Naples, Italy; (C.P.P.); (A.P.); (F.N.)
| | - Nicola Coppola
- Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Gabriella Di Giuseppe
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80135 Naples, Italy; (C.P.P.); (A.P.); (F.N.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-081-566-7708
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tomsic I, Heinze NR, Chaberny IF, Krauth C, Schock B, von Lengerke T. Implementation interventions in preventing surgical site infections in abdominal surgery: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:236. [PMID: 32192505 PMCID: PMC7083020 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-4995-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) are highly prevalent in abdominal surgery despite evidence-based prevention measures. Since guidelines are not self-implementing and SSI-preventive compliance is often insufficient, implementation interventions have been developed to promote compliance. This systematic review aims to identify implementation interventions used in abdominal surgery to prevent SSIs and determine associations with SSI reductions. Methods Literature was searched in April 2018 (Medline/PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection). Implementation interventions were classified using the implementation subcategories of the EPOC Taxonomy (Cochrane Review Group Effective Practice and Organisation of Care, EPOC). Additionally, an effectiveness analysis was conducted on the association between the number of implementation interventions, specific compositions thereof, and absolute and relative SSI risk reductions. Results Forty studies were included. Implementation interventions used most frequently (“top five”) were audit and feedback (80% of studies), organizational culture (70%), monitoring the performance of healthcare delivery (65%), reminders (53%), and educational meetings (45%). Twenty-nine studies (72.5%) used a multimodal strategy (≥3 interventions). An effectiveness analysis revealed significant absolute and relative SSI risk reductions. E.g., numerically, the largest absolute risk reduction of 10.8% pertained to thirteen studies using 3–5 interventions (p < .001); however, this was from a higher baseline rate than those with fewer or more interventions. The largest relative risk reduction was 52.4% for studies employing the top five interventions, compared to 43.1% for those not including these. Furthermore, neither the differences in risk reduction between studies with different numbers of implementation interventions (bundle size) nor between studies including the top five interventions (vs. not) were significant. Conclusion In SSI prevention in abdominal surgery, mostly standard bundles of implementation interventions are applied. While an effectiveness analysis of differences in SSI risk reduction by number and type of interventions did not render conclusive results, use of standard interventions such as audit and feedback, organizational culture, monitoring, reminders, and education at least does not seem to represent preventive malpractice. Further research should determine implementation interventions, or bundles thereof, which are most effective in promoting compliance with SSI-preventive measures in abdominal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivonne Tomsic
- Hannover Medical School, Centre for Public Health and Healthcare, Department of Medical Psychology, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Nicole R Heinze
- Hannover Medical School, Centre for Public Health and Healthcare, Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Iris F Chaberny
- Leipzig University Hospital, Centre for Infection Medicine (ZINF), Institute of Hygiene, Hospital Epidemiology and Environmental Medicine, Liebigstr. 22, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Krauth
- Hannover Medical School, Centre for Public Health and Healthcare, Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bettina Schock
- Leipzig University Hospital, Centre for Infection Medicine (ZINF), Institute of Hygiene, Hospital Epidemiology and Environmental Medicine, Liebigstr. 22, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thomas von Lengerke
- Hannover Medical School, Centre for Public Health and Healthcare, Department of Medical Psychology, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Factors hindering the implementation of surgical site infection control guidelines in the operating rooms of low-income countries: a mixed-method study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2018; 37:1923-1929. [PMID: 30097753 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3327-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
7
|
Pollmann AS, Bailey JG, Davis PJB, Johnson PM. Antibiotic use among older adults on an acute care general surgery service. Can J Surg 2017; 60:388-393. [PMID: 28930045 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.004317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotics play an important role in the treatment of many surgical diseases that affect older adults, and the potential for inappropriate use of these drugs is high. Our objective was to describe antibiotic use among older adults admitted to an acute care surgery service at a tertiary care teaching hospital. METHODS Detailed data regarding diagnosis, comorbidities, surgery and antibiotic use were retrospectively collected for patients 70 years and older admitted to an acute care surgery service. We evaluated antibiotic use (perioperative prophylaxis and treatment) for appropriateness based on published guidelines. RESULTS During the study period 453 patients were admitted to the acute care surgery service, and 229 underwent surgery. The most common diagnoses were small bowel obstruction (27.2%) and acute cholecystitis (11.0%). In total 251 nonelective abdominal operations were performed, and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was appropriate in 49.5% of cases. The most common prophylaxis errors were incorrect timing (15.5%) and incorrect dose (12.4%). Overall 206 patients received treatment with antibiotics for their underlying disease process, and 44.2% received appropriate first-line drug therapy. The most common therapeutic errors were administration of second- or third-line antibiotics without indication (37.9%) and use of antibiotics when not indicated (12.1%). There was considerable variation in the duration of treatment for patients with the same diagnoses. CONCLUSION Inappropriate antibiotic use was common among older patients admitted to an acute care surgery service. Quality improvement initiatives are needed to ensure patients receive optimal care in this complex hospital environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André S Pollmann
- From the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Pollmann, Bailey, Davis, Johnson); and the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Bailey, Davis, Johnson)
| | - Jon G Bailey
- From the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Pollmann, Bailey, Davis, Johnson); and the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Bailey, Davis, Johnson)
| | - Philip J B Davis
- From the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Pollmann, Bailey, Davis, Johnson); and the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Bailey, Davis, Johnson)
| | - Paul M Johnson
- From the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Pollmann, Bailey, Davis, Johnson); and the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Bailey, Davis, Johnson)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Collaborative G. Determining the worldwide epidemiology of surgical site infections after gastrointestinal resection surgery: protocol for a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study (GlobalSurg 2). BMJ Open 2017; 7:e012150. [PMID: 28733294 PMCID: PMC5577891 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication following major gastrointestinal surgery, affecting between 25% and 40% of patients. The rate of SSI doubles from low-income to high-income settings, persisting after risk adjustment. The relative impact of antibiotic-resistant organisms and the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis globally are unknown. This study aims to determine SSI rates following gastrointestinal surgery across worldwide hospital settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This multicentre, international, prospective cohort study will be undertaken by any hospital providing emergency or elective gastroenterological surgical services. Centres will collect observational data on consecutive patients undergoing emergency or elective gastrointestinal resection, cholecystectomy or appendicectomy during a 6-month period. The primary outcome is the incidence of SSI with secondary outcomes describing the organisms causing SSIs, including their antibiotic susceptibility, and the microbiological tests used to identify them. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This project will not affect clinical practice and has been classified as clinical audit following research ethics review. The protocol will be disseminated through the international GlobalSurg network. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02662231.
Collapse
|