1
|
Chaouch MA, Hussain MI, Gouader A, Krimi B, Mazzotta A, Costa ACD, Petrucciani N, Bouassida M, Khan J, Noomen F, Oweira H. Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety. Cancer Control 2024; 31:10732748241236338. [PMID: 38410083 PMCID: PMC10898296 DOI: 10.1177/10732748241236338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and hand-sewn IPAA with mucosectomy in cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Subgroup analysis was performed according to the indication for surgery. RESULTS The bibliographic research yielded 31 trials: 3 RCTs, 5 prospective clinical trials, and 24 CCTs including 8872 patients: 4871 patients in the stapled group and 4038 in the hand-sewn group. Regarding postoperative outcomes, the stapled group had a lower rate of anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, and ileal pouch failure. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, anastomotic leak, pelvic sepsis, pouchitis, or hospital stay. For functional outcomes, the stapled group was associated with greater outcomes in terms of seepage per day and by night, pad use, night incontinence, resting pressure, and squeeze pressure. There were no differences in stool Frequency per 24h, stool frequency at night, antidiarrheal medication, sexual impotence, or length of the high-pressure zone. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of dysplasia and neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS Compared to hand-sewn anastomosis, stapled ileoanal anastomosis leads to a large reduction in anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, ileal pouch failure, seepage by day and night, pad use, and night incontinence. This may ensure a higher resting pressure and squeeze pressure in manometry evaluation. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION The protocol was registered at PROSPERO under CRD 42022379880.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Ali Chaouch
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Monastir University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Mohammad Iqbal Hussain
- Department of Robotic Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Amine Gouader
- Department of Surgery, Perpignan Hospital Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Bassam Krimi
- Department of Surgery, Perpignan Hospital Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Alessandro Mazzotta
- Department of Surgery, M. G. Vannini Hospital, Istituto Figlie Di San Camillo, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Niccolo Petrucciani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, St Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Mehdi Bouassida
- Department of Surgery, Nabeul Hospital University, Nabeul, Tunisia
| | - Jim Khan
- Department of Robotic Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Faouzi Noomen
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Monastir University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Hani Oweira
- Department of Surgery, Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Garfinkle R, Savage P, Boutros M, Landry T, Reynier P, Morin N, Vasilevsky CA, Filion KB. Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:2430-2443. [PMID: 31020433 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06794-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postoperative ileus (POI) is regarded as the most clinically significant morbidity following loop ileostomy closure; however, its incidence remains poorly understood. Our objective was therefore to determine the pooled incidence of POI after loop ileostomy closure and identify risk factors associated with its development. METHODS We systematically searched MEDLINE (via Ovid and PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, Biosis Previews, and Scopus to identify studies reporting the incidence of POI in patients who underwent loop ileostomy closure. Two independent reviewers extracted data and appraised study quality. Cumulative incidence proportions were pooled across studies using a random-effects meta-analytic model. RESULTS Sixty-seven studies, including 9528 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of POI was 8.0% (95% CI 6.9-9.3%; I2 = 74%). The estimated incidence varied by POI definition: studies with a robust definition of POI (n = 8) demonstrated the highest estimate of POI (12.4%, 95% CI 9.2-16.5%; I2 = 79%) while studies that did not report an explicit POI definition (n = 38) demonstrated the lowest estimate (6.7%, 95% CI 5.3-8.3%; I2 = 61%). Small bowel anastomosis technique (hand-sewn) and interval time from ileostomy creation to closure (longer time) were the factors most commonly associated with POI after loop ileostomy closure. However, most comparative studies were not powered to examine risk factors for POI. CONCLUSIONS POI is an important complication after loop ileostomy closure, and its incidence is dependent on its definition. More research aimed at studying this complication is required to better understand risk factors for POI after loop ileostomy closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Garfinkle
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Paul Savage
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marylise Boutros
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tara Landry
- Medical Libraries, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pauline Reynier
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Nancy Morin
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carol-Ann Vasilevsky
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kristian B Filion
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada. .,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The safety and feasibility of early discharge following ileostomy reversal: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. J Surg Res 2017; 217:247-251. [PMID: 28711368 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Revised: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare 30-day clinical outcomes following routine ileostomy reversal between patients that underwent early discharge (<24 h) and standard discharge (postoperative day [POD] 2 or 3). METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted between 2005 and 2014 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set. All patients undergoing ileostomy reversal who were discharged on POD 0 or 1 (early discharge group [EDG]) versus POD 2 or 3 (standard discharge group [SDG]) were identified. The primary outcome was the 30-day adverse event rate. The secondary outcome was the 30-day readmission rate. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the adjusted effect of early discharge as well as the predictors of adverse events and readmissions. RESULTS The study population consisted of 355 and 5805 patients in the EDG and SDG, respectively. There were 19 (5.4%) 30-day adverse events in the EDG and 341 (5.8%) in the SDG. The EDG had 17 (4.8%) 30-day readmissions and the SDG had 294 (5.1%). The adjusted odds ratio for 30-day adverse events in the EDG was 0.95 (P = 0.83), and for 30-day readmissions, it was 1.01 (P = 0.96). Higher BMI, longer operative time, ASA ≥3, chronic steroid use along with a history of bleeding disorder were significant predictors for adverse events and readmissions. CONCLUSIONS Select patients discharged within 24 h of ileostomy reversal did not have a significantly higher rate of adverse events or readmissions compared to patients discharged on POD 2 or 3 following uncomplicated surgery. Predictors of adverse events and readmissions can guide the selection of patients suitable for early discharge.
Collapse
|
4
|
Shi H, Chen SY, Wang YG, Jiang SJ, Cai HL, Lin K, Xie ZF, Dong FF. Percutaneous transgastric endoscopic tube ileostomy in a porcine survival model. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:8375-8381. [PMID: 27729743 PMCID: PMC5055867 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i37.8375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Revised: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/30/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To introduce natural orifice transgastric endoscopic surgery (NOTES) tube ileostomy using pelvis-directed submucosal tunneling endoscopic gastrostomy and endoscopic tube ileostomy.
METHODS Six live pigs (three each in the non-survival and survival groups) were used. A double-channeled therapeutic endoscope was introduced perorally into the stomach. A gastrostomy was made using a 2-cm transversal mucosal incision following the creation of a 5-cm longitudinal pelvis-directed submucosal tunnel. The pneumoperitoneum was established via the endoscope. In the initial three operations of the series, a laparoscope was transumbilically inserted for guiding the tunnel direction, intraperitoneal spatial orientation and distal ileum identification. Endoscopic tube ileostomy was conducted by adopting an introducer method and using a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Catheter Kit equipped with the Loop Fixture. The distal tip of the 15 Fr catheter was placed toward the proximal limb of the ileum to optimize intestinal content drainage. Finally, the tunnel entrance of the gastrostomy was closed using nylon endoloops with the aid of a twin grasper. The gross and histopathological integrity of gastrostomy closure and the abdominal wall-ileum stoma tract formation were assessed 1 wk after the operation.
RESULTS Transgastric endoscopic tube ileostomy was successful in all six pigs, without major bleeding. The mean operating time was 71 min (range: 60-110 min). There were no intraoperative complications or hemodynamic instability. The post-mortem, which was conducted 1-wk postoperatively, showed complete healing of the gastrostomy and adequate stoma tract formation of ileostomy.
CONCLUSION Transgastric endoscopic tube ileostomy is technically feasible and reproducible in an animal model, and this technique is worthy of further improvement.
Collapse
|
5
|
Shwaartz C, Fields AC, Sobrero M, Cohen BD, Divino CM. Effect of Anti-TNF Agents on Postoperative Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Single Institution Experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20:1636-42. [PMID: 27405310 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3194-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have been an integral part in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. However, a subset of inflammatory bowel disease patients ultimately requires surgery and up to 30 % of them have undergone treatment with anti-TNF agents. Studies assessing the effect of anti-TNF agents on postoperative outcomes have been inconsistent. The aim of this study is to assess postoperative morbidity in inflammatory bowel disease patients who underwent surgery with anti-TNF therapy prior to surgery. METHODS This is a retrospective review of 282 patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing intestinal surgery between 2013 and 2015 at the Mount Sinai Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups based on treatment with anti-TNF agents (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab) within 8 weeks of surgery. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were recorded. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were carried out. RESULTS Seventy-three patients were treated with anti-TNF therapy within 8 weeks of surgery while 209 patients did not have exposure. Thirty-day anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal abscess, wound infection, extra-abdominal infection, readmission, and mortality rates were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The use of anti-TNF medications in inflammatory bowel disease patients within 2 months of intestinal surgery is not associated with an increased risk of 30-day postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaya Shwaartz
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1041, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Adam C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1041, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Maximiliano Sobrero
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1041, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Brian D Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1041, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Celia M Divino
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1041, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|