Survival impact of neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study involving 18,332 patients from the National Cancer Data Base

Microscopic tumor mapping of post-neoadjuvant therapy pancreatic cancer specimens to predict post-surgical recurrence: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although various pathological grading systems are available for evaluating the response of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), their prognostic value has not been thoroughly validated. This study examined whether microscopic tumor mapping of post-NAT specimens could predict tumor recurrence.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 52 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy after NAT for PDAC between 2019 and 2021. Microscopic mapping was performed to identify residual tumor loci within the tumor bed using 4 mm2 pixels. Patients were divided into small extent (SE; n = 26) and large extent (LE; n = 26) groups using a cutoff value of 226 mm2. The diagnostic performance for predicting tumor recurrence was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were normalised after NAT in more patients in the SE group (SE 21 [80.8%] vs. LE 13 [50.0%]; P = 0.041). Tumor size (P < 0.001), T stage (P < 0.001), positive lymph node yield (P = 0.024), and perineural invasion rate (P = 0.018) were significantly greater in the LE group. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was significantly lower in the LE group (SE 83.3% vs. LE 50.0%, P = 0.004). The area under the ROC curve for mapping extent was 0.743, which was greater than that of the other tumor response scoring systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Microscopic tumor mapping of the residual tumor in post-NAT specimens is a significant predictor of post-surgical recurrence, and offers better prognostic performance than the current grading systems.

Comparison of the upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Pancreatic cancer is a malignant disease with a dismal prognosis. While neoadjuvant therapy has shown promise in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, its role remains a subject of controversy among physicians. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Eligible studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Studies comparing neoadjuvant therapy with upfront surgery (with or without adjuvant therapy) in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were included. The primary endpoint assessed was overall survival. A total of 10,022 studies were identified, and the meta-analysis finally enrolled 50 revealed studies. The meta-analysis suggested that neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved the overall survival (HR 0.74, p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.75, p = 0.006) compared to the upfront surgery approach. Furthermore, neoadjuvant therapy leads to favorable postoperative outcomes, with an enhanced R0 resection rate (OR 1.90, p < 0.001) and reduced lymph node metastasis (OR 0.36, p < 0.001) and perineural invasion (OR 0.42, p < 0.001), although it is associated with a reduced resection rate (OR 0.42, p < 0.001). In addition, patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy experience superior survival benefits compared to those undergoing adjuvant therapy (HR 0.87, p = 0.019). These results are further corroborated by the subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neoadjuvant therapy has the potential to provide survival benefits and improve postoperative long-term outcomes for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. However, to validate and reinforce these findings, further well-designed and large trials are required.

Prognosticators for Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel Therapy and Pancreatectomy

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GemNP) therapies are increasingly used to treat patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, limited data are available on their clinicopathologic prognosticators. We examined the clinicopathologic factors and survival of 213 PDAC patients who received FOLFIRINOX with 71 patients who received GemNP. The FOLFIRINOX group was younger (p < 0.01) and had a higher rate of radiation (p = 0.049), higher rate of borderline resectable and locally advanced disease (p < 0.001), higher rate of Group 1 response (p = 0.045) and lower ypN stage (p = 0.03) than the GemNP group. Within FOLFIRINOX group, radiation was associated with decreased lymph node metastasis (p = 0.01) and lower ypN stage (p = 0.01). The tumor response group, ypT, ypN, LVI and PNI, correlated significantly with both DFS and OS (p < 0.05). Patients with the ypT0/T1a/T1b tumor had better DFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.03) than those with ypT1c tumor. In multivariate analysis, the tumor response group and ypN were independently prognostic factors for DFS and OS (p < 0.05). Our study demonstrated that the FOLFIRINOX group was younger and had a better pathologic response than the GemNP group and that the tumor response group, ypN, ypT, LVI and PNI, are significant prognostic factors for survival in these patients. Our results also suggest that the tumor size of 1.0 cm is a better cut off for ypT2. Our study highlights the importance of systemic pathologic examination and the reporting of post-treatment pancreatectomies.

Current Treatment of Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Medical Oncologist's Perspective

Pancreatic cancer has traditionally been associated with a dismal prognosis, even in early stages of the disease. In recent years, the introduction of newer generation chemotherapy regimens in the adjuvant setting has improved the survival of patients treated with upfront resection. However, there are multiple theoretical advantages to deliver early systemic therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. So far, the evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. The benefit of this treatment sequence for patients with resectable disease remains elusive. In this review, we summarize the data on adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer and describe which evidence backs the use of neoadjuvant therapy. Additionally, we address important issues faced in clinical practice when treating patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

Evolving management of early stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma in older patients

BACKGROUND

Due to the aging population, the number of older patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will continue to rise.

STUDY DESIGN

Utilizing the NCDB from 2010 to 2016, patients with early stage, clinically node negative PDAC who were ≥70 years old and had a Whipple were identified. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to determine independent factors for R0 resection and NAT. Cox-proportional-hazards regression analyses examined for the impact of NAT on the risk of death.

RESULTS

Of 5086 patients, 51.7% received upfront surgery + adjuvant therapy (UFS + AT), followed by 29.9% UFS only, and the remainder NAT. NAT significantly improved OS compared to a combined cohort of those that had UFS ± AT. NAT retained its independent survival benefit when compared to only patients that had UFS + AT.

CONCLUSION

For older patients diagnosed with early stage PDAC, NAT was associated with improved R0 resection rates and a significant survival benefit when compared to the current standard of care.

Factors associated with inability to return to intended oncologic treatment in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Return to Intended Oncologic Treatment (RIOT) has been proposed as a quality metric in the care of cancer patients. We sought to define factors associated with inability to RIOT in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients.

METHODS

The NCDB was queried for patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pathologic stage IB, IIA, or IIB PDAC from 2010 to 2016. Multivariable binary logistic regression models identified factors associated with failure to RIOT, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox multivariable regression models demonstrated the impact of failure to RIOT on survival.

RESULTS

Increasing age (p < .001), Hispanic race (p = .002), pathological stage IB (p = .004) and IIA (p = .001) as compared to IIB, increasing hospital stay (p < .001), and open surgical approach (p = .024) were associated with increased risk of inability to RIOT. Male sex (p < .001), Charlson-Deyo scores of 0 (p < .001) and 1 (p = .001) as compared to >2, negative surgical margins (p = .048), receiving care at academic institutions (p = .001), and increasing institutional case volume (p = .001) were associated with improved odds of RIOT.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient features can impact RIOT and should be considered when designing multi-modality treatment strategies.

The expression and prognostic value of toll-like receptors (TLRs) in pancreatic cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy

OBJECTIVES

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a pivotal role in the immune system and carcinogenesis. There is no research on TLR expression and association with survival among preoperatively treated pancreatic cancer patients. We studied the expression intensity and prognostic value of TLRs in pancreatic cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and compared the results to patients undergoing upfront surgery (US).

METHOD

Between 2000 and 2015, 71 borderline resectable patients were treated with NAT and surgery and 145 resectable patients underwent upfront surgery at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. We immunostained TLRs 1-5, 7, and 9 on sections of tissue-microarray. We classified TLR expression as 0 (negative), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (strong) and divided into high (2-3) and low (0-1) expression for statistical purposes.

RESULTS

Among TLRs 1, 3, and 9 (TLR1 81% vs 70%, p = 0.008; TLR3 92% vs 68%, p = 0.001; TLR9 cytoplasmic 83% vs 42%, p<0.001; TLR9 membranous 53% vs 25%, p = 0.002) NAT patients exhibited a higher immunopositivity score more frequently than patients undergoing upfront surgery. Among NAT patients, a high expression of TLR1 [Hazards ratio (HR) 0.48, p<0.05] associated with a longer postoperative survival, whereas among US patients, high expression of TLR5 (HR 0.64, p<0.05), TLR7 (HR 0.59, p<0.01, and both TLR7 and TLR9 (HR 0.5, p<0.01) predicted a favorable postoperative outcome in separate analysis adjusted for background variables.

CONCLUSIONS

We found higher immunopositive intensities among TLRs 1, 3, and 9 in NAT patients. A high TLR1 expression associated with a longer survival among NAT patients, however, among US patients, high expression intensity of TLR5 and TLR7 predicted a favorable postoperative outcome in the adjusted analysis.

Combined multiagent chemotherapy and radiotherapy is associated with prolonged overall survival in patients with non-operatively managed stage II-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Most patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) do not undergo surgical resection. The role of radiotherapy (RT) in non-operatively managed localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma is unclear.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2010-2016) was queried for patients with clinical stage II-III PDAC treated with multiagent systemic chemotherapy (CT) +/- RT but not surgery. Factors associated with the receipt of RT and overall survival were compared after adjusting for patient demographics and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 14,921 patients were included, of whom 9279 received CT and 5382 received CT + RT. Patients treated with CT + RT were more likely to be younger (65vs66yrs), treated at non-academic facilities (48.8%vs46.7%), have private insurance (40.3%vs36.5%), and have clinical T4 tumors (53.6%vs48.7%). Most patients who were treated with RT received external beam radiotherapy (89.3%), and the median dose was 5,000 cGy. Median time to start of RT was 129 days. CT + RT was associated with longer overall survival (15.9vs11.8mos,p < 0.001), and remained associated with survival on multivariable analysis (HR 0.74, 95%CI 0.70-0.78). On a 4-month conditional survival analysis, combined CT + RT remained associated with improved survival compared to CT alone (16.0vs13.1mos,p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with non-operatively managed localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, combined radiotherapy and multiagent systemic chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone.

Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy is Associated With Improved Pathologic Outcomes and Survival in Resected Stage II-III Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With Multiagent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Modern Era

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is being utilized more frequently in patients diagnosed with localized pancreatic cancer. The role of additional neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) remains undefined. We explored outcomes associated with neoadjuvant RT in the modern era.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2010-2017) was queried for patients with clinical stage II-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant multiagent systemic CT +/- RT. Demographics, pathologic outcomes, postoperative outcomes, and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 5245 patients were included, of whom 3123 received CT and 1941 received CT + RT. Use of RT decreased over the 8-year study period. On multivariable analysis, treatment at academic facilities (odds ratio (OR) = 1.52, P < .001) and clinical T4 tumors (OR = 1.68, P < .001) were independently associated with receipt of RT. Patients treated with CT + RT had a higher frequency of ypT0-T2 tumors (35.8% vs. 22.7%) and a lower rate of ypT3-T4 tumors (57.3% vs. 72.8%; P < .001), lower rate of node-positive disease (36.6% vs. 59.8%, P < .001), and margin-positive resections (13.8% vs. 20.2%, P < .001), but slightly higher 90-day postoperative mortality (4.9% vs. 3.6%, P = .04). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy+ RT was associated with longer overall survival (32.7 vs. 29.8 months, P = .008), and remained independently associated with survival on multivariable analysis (HR = .85, P < .001).

DISCUSSION

In patients with stage II-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the addition of neoadjuvant RT to multiagent neoadjuvant CT may be associated with increased rates of node-negative and margin-negative resection, as well as improved overall survival.

Perception versus reality: A National Cohort Analysis of the surgery-first approach for resectable pancreatic cancer

Introduction

Although surgical resection is necessary, it is not sufficient for long‐term survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We sought to evaluate survival after up‐front surgery (UFS) in anatomically resectable PDAC in the context of three critical factors: (A) margin status; (B) CA19‐9; and (C) receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base (2010–2015) was reviewed for clinically resectable (stage 0/I/II) PDAC patients. Surgical margins, pre‐operative CA19‐9, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated. Patient overall survival was stratified based on these factors and their respective combinations. Outcomes after UFS were compared to equivalently staged patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on an intention‐to‐treat (ITT) basis.

Results

Twelve thousand and eighty‐nine patients were included (n = 9197 UFS, n = 2892 ITT neoadjuvant). In the UFS cohort, only 20.4% had all three factors (median OS = 31.2 months). Nearly 1/3rd (32.7%) of UFS patients had none or only one factor with concomitant worst survival (median OS = 14.7 months). Survival after UFS decreased with each failing factor (two factors: 23 months, one factor: 15.5 months, no factors: 7.9 months) and this persisted after adjustment. Overall survival was superior in the ITT‐neoadjuvant cohort (27.9 vs. 22 months) to UFS.

Conclusion

Despite the perceived benefit of UFS, only 1‐in‐5 UFS patients actually realize maximal survival when known factors highly associated with outcomes are assessed. Patients are proportionally more likely to do worst, rather than best after UFS treatment. Similarly staged patients undergoing ITT‐neoadjuvant therapy achieve survival superior to the majority of UFS patients. Patients and providers should be aware of the false perception of ‘optimal’ survival benefit with UFS in anatomically resectable PDAC.

Pathology of Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Its Clinical Implications

CONTEXT.—

Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy has been increasingly used to treat patients with potentially resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Neoadjuvant therapy often induces extensive fibrosis in tumor, adjacent pancreatic parenchyma, and peripancreatic tissue. Histopathologic evaluations and histologic tumor response grading (HTRG) of posttherapy pancreatectomy specimens are very difficult and challenging. Studies on prognostic significance of posttherapy pathologic staging, optimal system for HTRG, and other pathologic parameters in treated PDAC patients are limited.

OBJECTIVE.—

This review is to provide a timely update of the prognostic values of posttherapy pathologic staging, HTRG, and other pathologic parameters in PDAC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and pancreas resection.

DATA SOURCES.—

Systemic review of major studies on pathologic evaluation and its clinicopathologic implications in treated PDAC patients.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Systemic pathologic examination, histologic tumor regression grading, pathologic evaluation of the margins, tumor involvement of superior mesenteric vein/portal vein, accurate pathologic staging, and reporting of posttherapy pancreatectomy specimens provide highly valuable prognostic information for postoperative patient care. Our findings suggest for the first time that tumor size of 1.0 cm, instead of 2.0 cm, is a better cutoff for ypT2 in PDAC patients. The newly proposed 3-tier MD Anderson HTRG system not only has proved to be an independent prognostic marker for PDAC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and pancreatectomy, but also improves interobserver agreement among pathologists in evaluation of tumor response. This grading system should be considered in future editions of the College of American Pathologists protocol for PDAC.

Upfront resection versus neoadjuvant therapy for T1/T2 pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of neoadjuvant therapy remains controversial for resectable pancreatic neoplasms. We evaluated treatment outcomes for T1/T2 tumors.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients with T1/T2 (Stage I-II) pancreatic cancer within the NCDB. Treatment-sequence variables were used for classification: "surgery + chemotherapy" (S+C), "chemotherapy + surgery" (C+S), "surgery only" (SO), and "chemotherapy only" (CO).

RESULTS

13 412 patients were included; the majority had T2 tumors. 8 490 received upfront surgery; 4 922 preoperative chemotherapy. In the surgery branch, 5 684 received surgery and chemotherapy (S+C); 2 806 did not receive chemotherapy (SO). Of those intended to receive preoperative chemotherapy, 3 804 received only chemotherapy (CO); 1 118 proceeded to surgery (C+S). Median survival for S+C and C+S groups was similar (25.9 vs 26.2) [HR 0.92, p= 0.41]. Compared to the CO group, the SO group had improved median survival (13.5 vs. 10.8) [HR 0.63, p<0.001]. Branched analyses demonstrated improved median and 5-year (20.8% vs 12.7%) survival for patients receiving upfront resection [HR 0.77, p<0.001].

CONCLUSION

Patients with T1/T2 pancreatic cancer have similar survival irrespective of the timing of chemotherapy and surgery, if they receive both. Upfront resection ensures surgery is delivered, increasing the possibility of long-term survival.

Facility volume-survival relationship in patients with early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival compared with upfront pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Treatment at high-volume pancreatic surgery centers is associated with improved short-term postoperative outcomes compared with low-volume centers. We compared overall survival of patients with early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy before resection stratified by facility volume.

METHODS

Patients with clinical T0 to T2 pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy before pancreatoduodenectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database (2010-2016). High-volume pancreatic surgery centers performed ≥36 pancreatectomies/year. Patients were matched 1:1 by propensity score. Pathologic outcomes, postoperative outcomes, and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

Before matching, 1,449 patients were treated at low-volume centers and 250 at high-volume pancreatic surgery centers. After matching, there were 177 patients per group. High-volume pancreatic surgery centers were more commonly academic/research facilities (99.4% vs 54.0%; P < .001), and patients traveled greater distances (65 vs 13 miles; P < .001). Time from diagnosis to neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was similar. Treatment at high-volume pancreatic surgery centers was associated with shorter duration of stay (7 vs 8 days; P = .003) and lower 90-day mortality rate after pancreatoduodenectomy (0.0% vs 5.0%; P = .01). Patients treated at high-volume pancreatic surgery centers had improved overall survival (36.3 vs 29.4 months; P = .03; hazard ratio 0.73). On subset analysis of academic/research facilities, high-volume pancreatic surgery centers remained associated with shorter duration of stay, lower 90-day mortality, and greater overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma received care at low-volume centers. Treatment at high-volume pancreatic surgery centers was associated with improved overall survival and short-term postoperative outcomes.

Combining CRP and CA19-9 in a novel prognostic score in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Inflammation promotes tumor progression, induces invasion and metastatic spread. This retrospective study explored CRP, CA19-9, and routine laboratory values as preoperative prognostic factors in pancreatic cancer patients. Between 2000 and 2016, there were 212 surgically treated pancreatic cancer patients at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. Out of these, 76 borderline resectable patients were treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT); 136 upfront resected patients were matched for age and sex at a 1:2 ratio. We analyzed preoperative CRP, CA19-9, CEA, leukocytes, albumin, bilirubin and platelets. CRP and CA19-9 were combined into a prognostic score: both CRP and CA19-9 below the cut-off values (3 mg/l and 37 kU/l, respectively), either CRP or CA19-9 above the cut-off value, and finally, both CRP and CA19-9 above the cut-off values. Among all patients, median disease-specific survival times were 54, 27 and 16 months, respectively (p < 0.001). At 5 years, among patients with CRP and CA19-9 levels below the cut-off values, 49% were alive and 45% were disease-free. Among NAT patients the corresponding survival rates were 52% and 45% and among those undergoing upfront surgery 45% and 40%, respectively. This novel prognostic score combining CRP and CA19-9 serves as a useful preoperative tool estimating survival.

Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with lower margin positivity rates after Pancreaticoduodenectomy in T1 and T2 pancreatic head cancers: An analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for T1/T2 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial. We compared positive margin rates in patients with clinical T1&T2 tumors who did and did not receive NAT.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) found clinical T1&T2 PDAC patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2004 to 2014. Univariate and multivariate regression determined factors associated with a positive margin and survival.

RESULTS

9795 patients underwent surgery for clinical T1 or T2 pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. 8472 patients had data regarding use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies; of which, 774 (9.1%) received NAT and 435 (5.1%) received both chemotherapy and radiation therapy. NAT was found to lower positive margin rates from 21.8 to 15.5% (p < 0.0001) and when radiation was added this rate dropped to 13.4%. Positive margins were associated with worse overall survival (14.9 vs. 23.9 months; HR 1.702, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

NAT is associated with a reduced positive margin rate in patients with T1 and T2 tumors. These findings support ongoing and future clinical trials of NAT in T1 and T2, early stage PDAC to determine impacts on survival.

The utilization and impact of adjuvant therapy following neoadjuvant therapy and resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does more really matter?

BACKGROUND

Although neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly administered to patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the impact of additional adjuvant therapy (AT) following resection is not well defined.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by R0 or R1 resection for PDAC. Factors influencing survival, including the receipt of AT were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and resection 680 (33.8%) received AT and 1331 (66.2%) did not. For R0 resected patients (n = 1800), lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.24, p = 0.034) and increasing N classification (N1: HR 1.27, p = 0.019; N2: HR 1.51, p = 0.004) were associated with increased risk of death while AT was not associated with improved overall survival (OS) (HR 0.88, p = 0.179). Following R1 resection (n = 211), AT was associated with reduced risk of death (HR 0.57, p = 0.038). Within propensity matched cohorts, median OS for patients receiving and not receiving AT was 32.1 and 30.0 months after R0 resection (p = 0.184), and 23.6 and 20.5 months after R1 resection (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrated that AT did not yield OS benefit for patients who had neoadjuvant therapy and R0 resection and a statistically significant, although relatively short, improvement in OS for patients who underwent R1 resection.

Microscopic size measurements in post-neoadjuvant therapy resections of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) predict patient outcomes

AIMS

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) are increasingly being treated with neoadjuvant therapy. However, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition T staging based on tumour size does not reflect treatment effect, which often results in multiple, small foci of residual tumour in a background of mass-forming fibrosis. Thus, we evaluated the performance of AJCC 8th edition T staging in predicting patient outcomes by the use of a microscopic tumour size measurement method.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and six post-neoadjuvant therapy pancreatectomies were reviewed, and all individual tumour foci were measured. T stages based on gross size with microscopic adjustment (GS) and the largest single microscopic focus size (MFS) were examined in association with clinicopathological variables and patient outcomes. Sixty-three of 106 (59%) were locally advanced; 78% received FOLFIRINOX treatment. The average GS and MFS were 25 mm and 11 mm, respectively; nine cases each were classified as T0, 35 and 85 cases as T1, 42 and 12 cases as T2, and 20 and 0 cases as T3, based on the GS and the MFS, respectively. Higher GS-based and MFS-based T stages were significantly associated with higher tumour regression grade, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and higher N stage. Furthermore, higher MFS-based T stage was significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.001) and shorter overall survival (OS) (P = 0.002). GS was significantly associated with OS (P = 0.046), but not with DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

In post-neoadjuvant therapy PDAC resections, MFS-based T staging is superior to GS-based T staging for predicting patient outcomes, suggesting that microscopic measurements have clinical utility beyond the conventional use of GS measurements alone.

Neoadjuvant Therapy is Essential for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Awareness of the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy is increasing, but its use as an initial therapeutic option for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial, especially for those patients without high-risk prognostic features. Even for patients with high-risk features who are candidates to receive neoadjuvant therapy, no standard regimen exists.

METHODS

In this review, we examined available data on the neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, including prospective studies, retrospective studies, and ongoing clinical trials, by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The characteristics and results of screened studies were described.

RESULTS

Retrospective and prospective studies with reported results and ongoing randomized studies were included. For patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant therapy provides benefits such as increased survival, decreased risk of comorbidities and mortality, and improved cost-effectiveness due to an increased completion rate of multimodal treatment. Highly active regimens such as FOLFIRINOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel are considered acceptable therapeutic regimens. Additionally, platinum-containing regimens other than FOLFIRINOX are acceptable for selected patients. Other therapies, such as chemoradiation treatment, immuno-oncology agents, and targeted therapies are being explored and the results are highly anticipated.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. Some regimens are currently acceptable, but need more evidence from well-designed clinical trials or should be used after being carefully examined by a multidisciplinary team.

Proposal for a definition of "Oligometastatic disease in pancreatic cancer"

BACKGROUND

To date, patients with metastasized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC M1) are regarded as a uniform collective. We hypothesize the existence of oligometastatic disease (OMD): a state of PDAC M1 disease with better tumor biology, limited metastasis, and increased survival.

METHODS

Data of 128 PDAC M1 patients treated at the University of Cologne between 2008 and 2018 was reviewed. Interdependence between clinical parameter was calculated using the Mann-Whitney U-Test. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Eighty-one (63%) patients had metastases confined to one organ (single organ metastasis, SOG) whereas the remaining 47 (37%) showed multiple metastatic sites (multi-organ metastasis, MOG). Survival analysis revealed a median overall survival (OS) of 12.2 months for SOG vs 4.5 months for MOG (95% CI 5.7-9.8; p < 0.001). We defined limited disease by the presence of ≤4 metastases in liver or lung. Limited disease together with CA 19-9 baseline < 1000 U/ml and response or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy defined OMD. We identified 8 patients with hepatic metastases and 2 with pulmonary metastases matching all OMD criteria. This group of 10 (7.8%) had a median overall survival of 19.4 vs 7.2 months compared to the remaining patients (95% CI 5.7-9.8; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

We propose a definition of oligometastatic disease in PDAC including anatomical criteria and biological criteria reflecting better tumor biology. The 10 OMD patients (7.8%) survived significantly longer and might even benefit from surgical resection in the future.

Area of residual tumor (ART) can predict prognosis after post neoadjuvant therapy resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

An increasing number of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have undergone resection after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We have reported Area of Residual Tumor (ART) as a useful pathological assessment method to predict patient outcomes after post NAT resection in various cancer types. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic performance of ART in PDAC resected after NAT. Sixty-three patients with PDAC after post NAT resection were analyzed. The viable residual tumor area was outlined and the measurement of ART was performed using morphometric software. The results were compared with those of the College of American Pathologist (CAP) regression grading. Of 63 cases, 39 (62%) patients received chemoradiation therapy and 24 (38%) received chemotherapy only. The median value of ART was 163 mm2. Large ART with 220 mm2 as the cut-off was significantly associated with lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion and perineural invasion, while CAP regression grading was not associated with any clinicopathological features. By multivariate analysis, large ART (≥220 mm2) was an independent predictor of shorter relapse free survival. Together with our previous reports, an ART-based pathological assessment may become a useful method to predict patient outcomes after post NAT resection across various cancer types.

The influence of adjuvant therapy on survival in patients with indeterminate margins following surgery for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The significance of indeterminate margins following surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unknown. We evaluated the influence of adjuvant therapy on survival in patients whose cancer showed indeterminate margins.

METHODS

Patients whose cancer showed indeterminate margins following surgery for NSCLC were identified in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015, and stratified by receipt of adjuvant treatment. The primary outcome was overall survival, which was evaluated with multivariable Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

Indeterminate margins occurred in 0.31% of 232,986 patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC and was associated with worse survival compared with margin negative resection (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-1.67). Anatomic resection was protective against the finding of indeterminate margins in logistic regression. Amongst 553 patients with indeterminate margins, 343 (62%) received no adjuvant therapy, 96 (17%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 33 (6%) received adjuvant radiation, and 81 (15%) received adjuvant chemoradiation. Any mode of adjuvant therapy was not associated with improved survival compared with no further treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of indeterminate margins is reported in 0.31% of patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for NSCLC. This was associated with worse overall survival compared with complete resection and not mitigated by adjuvant therapy. The risks and benefits of adjuvant therapy should be carefully considered for patients with indeterminate margins after surgery for NSCLC.

Systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy in modern pancreatic cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains a disease with a poor prognosis despite advances in surgery and systemic therapies. Neoadjuvant therapy strategies are a promising alternative to adjuvant chemotherapy. However, their role remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing neoadjuvant therapy with a surgery first approach (with or without adjuvant therapy) in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were included. The primary outcome assessed was overall survival. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, together with pooling of unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curve data.

RESULTS

A total of 533 studies were identified that analysed the effect of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Twenty-seven studies were included in the final data synthesis. Meta-analysis suggested beneficial effects of neoadjuvant therapy with prolonged survival compared with a surgery-first approach, (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.76). In addition, R0 resection rates were significantly higher in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (relative risk 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.55). Individual patient data analysis suggested that overall survival was better for patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy has a beneficial effect on overall survival in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in comparison with upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy. Further trials are needed to address the need for practice change.

Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Upfront Surgical Resection for Pancreatic Cancer Is Uncommon Yet Associated With Improved Survival

BACKGROUND

Multiple trials have demonstrated a survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to identify the rate for completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, factors associated with completion, and its impact on survival after surgical resection.

METHODS

The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Medicare-linked data was used to identify patients who underwent upfront resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2013. Billing codes were used to quantify receipt and completion of chemotherapy. Factors associated with completion of chemotherapy were identified using multivariable regression. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazards modeling were used to examine survival.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 2440 patients. Of these patients, 65% received no adjuvant chemotherapy, 28% received incomplete therapy, and 7% completed chemotherapy. The factors associated with chemotherapy completion were nodal metastases and treatment at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center (p ≤ 0.05). Comorbidities decreased the odds of completion (p ≤ 0.05). The median overall survival (OS) was 14 months for the patients who received no adjuvant chemotherapy, 17 months for those who received incomplete adjuvant chemotherapy, and 22 months for those who completed adjuvant chemotherapy (p ≤ 0.05). More recent diagnosis, comorbidities, T stage, nodal metastases, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with an increased hazard ratio for death (p ≤ 0.05). Evaluation of 15 or more nodes and completion of chemotherapy decreased the hazard ratio for death (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 7% of the Medicare patients who underwent upfront resection for pancreatic cancer completed adjuvant chemotherapy, yet completion of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS. Completion of adjuvant chemotherapy should be the goal after upfront resection, but neoadjuvant chemotherapy may ensure that patients receive systemic chemotherapy.

Combining the Specific Anti-MUC1 Antibody TAB004 and Lip-MSA-IL-2 Limits Pancreatic Cancer Progression in Immune Competent Murine Models of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Immunotherapy regimens have shown success in subsets of cancer patients; however, their efficacy against pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) remain unclear. Previously, we demonstrated the potential of TAB004, a monoclonal antibody targeting the unique tumor-associated form of MUC1 (tMUC1) in the early detection of PDA. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic benefit of combining the TAB004 antibody with Liposomal-MSA-IL-2 in immune competent and human MUC1 transgenic (MUC1.Tg) mouse models of PDA and investigated the associated immune responses. Treatment with TAB004 + Lip-MSA-IL-2 resulted in significantly improved survival and slower tumor growth compared to controls in MUC1.Tg mice bearing an orthotopic PDA.MUC1 tumor. Similarly, in the spontaneous model of PDA that expresses human MUC1, the combination treatment stalled the progression of pancreatic intraepithelial pre-neoplastic (PanIN) lesion to adenocarcinoma. Treatment with the combination elicited a robust systemic and tumor-specific immune response with (a) increased percentages of systemic and tumor infiltrated CD45+CD11b+ cells, (b) increased levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO), (c) increased antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity/phagocytosis (ADCC/ADCP), (d) decreased percentage of immune regulatory cells (CD8+CD69+ cells), and (e) reduced circulating levels of immunosuppressive tMUC1. We report that treatment with a novel antibody against tMUC1 in combination with a unique formulation of IL-2 can improve survival and lead to stable disease in appropriate models of PDA by reducing tumor-induced immune regulation and promoting recruitment of CD45+CD11b+ cells, thereby enhancing ADCC/ADCP.

Expression of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Markers in Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays an important role in the progression, metastasis, and chemoresistance of pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, the expression of EMT markers and their clinical significance in PDAC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are unclear.

METHODS

We examined the expression of EMT markers, including Zeb-1 (zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1), E-cadherin, and vimentin by immunohistochemistry in 120 PDAC patients who received NAT and pancreatectomy from 1999 to 2007. The results were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and survival.

RESULTS

Among 120 cases, 45 (37.5%) and 14 (11.7%) were positive for Zeb-1 and vimentin, respectively, and 25 (20.8%) were E-cadherin-low. The median overall survival and disease-free survival were 35.3 (standard deviation [SD], 2.8) and 15.9 (SD, 3.6) months, respectively, in vimentin-negative group compared with 16.1 (SD, 1.1) (P = 0.03) and 7.0 (SD, 1.1) months (P = 0.02) in the vimentin-positive group. In multivariate analysis, vimentin expression was an independent predictor of shorter disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-4.78; P = 0.016) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-4.89; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers are frequently expressed in treated PDAC. Vimentin expression is a prognostic biomarker for survival in PDAC patients who received NAT.

Large database utilization in health outcomes research in pancreatic cancer: an update

We sought to review published aggregate dataset studies on pancreatic cancer in the national and international settings, discuss the advantages and disadvantages these datasets possess, and possible future directions. A combination of Google Scholar, PubMed, and MEDLINE were used with search terms "pancreatic cancer" + "resectable" + "national cancer database", "pancreatic cancer" + "unresectable" + "national cancer database" and more broadly "borderline resectable pancreatic cancer", "locally advanced pancreatic cancer", "unresectable pancreatic cancer", and "resectable pancreatic cancer". Original articles and abstracts from this search were included, including data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, National Cancer Database (NCDB), and SEER-Medicare within the United States (US), as well as international database studies. Multiple database studies have been published regarding the role for radiotherapy in resected pancreatic cancer (n=6), the timing of additional therapy in resectable pancreatic cancer (n=4), and the role for radiotherapy and resection in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) (n=4). Studies from both SEER and NCDB found a survival benefit to post-operative radiotherapy. In resectable pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant treatment was found to be superior to adjuvant (NCDB). Chemoradiotherapy was found to be more beneficial than chemotherapy alone in LAPC, and patients who received highly-conformal or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) had improved survival compared to either conformal radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone. These studies also found that up to 10% of patients underwent resection, with a 90% margin-negative rate, and either one-half to one-third the risk of death of non-surgical patients. Criticism of large datasets includes lack of granularity of performance status, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes-related data compared to properly administered prospective trials, as well as cross-over between treatment arms that cannot be accounted for, and concerns over quality of data represented. The US has witnessed a growing number of comparative effectiveness studies in pancreatic cancer. When taken together, certain themes emerge that are consistent with both single-institution data and clinical trials. These studies have also provided insight into questions not readily answerable by clinical trials. However, they require caution in interpretation.

Recent treatment patterns and survival outcomes in pancreatic cancer according to clinical stage based on single-center large-cohort data

Backgrounds/Aims

We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study to evaluate the impact of various treatment modalities and recent changes in treatment modalities, including the increased application of chemotherapy, on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Methods

All patients with pancreatic cancer who were diagnosed and treated at Seoul National University Hospital between January 2007 and December 2014 were registered in a prospective clinical database and included in this retrospective study. All patients' radiologic imaging diagnoses were re-reviewed according to the National Cancer Center Network guidelines. The patients were divided into four groups according to their clinical stage, and each clinical stage group was further divided into four groups according to treatment modality.

Results

Overall, 475 (28.9%) patients had resectable pancreatic cancer, 129 (7.8%) patients borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, 384 (23.3%) patients locally advanced pancreatic cancer, and 658 (40.0%) patients metastatic pancreatic cancer. Among the patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, the median survival was significantly longer in the neoadjuvant therapy (NAT)+surgery groups (24 months) than the surgery without NAT (16 months) group (p=0.049). A multivariate survival analysis revealed that compared with the surgery group, the 5-year mortality risk was decreased by 35% in the NAT+surgery group (24 vs. 20 months, p=0.045).

Conclusions

This retrospective cohort study showed that the rates of resectable and surgically treatable pancreatic cancer were 29.1% and 32.2%, which are higher than those reported previously, and aggressive NAT for select advanced-stage patients could lead to better survival outcomes.

Outcomes after neoadjuvant treatment with gemcitabine and erlotinib followed by gemcitabine-erlotinib and radiotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer (GEMCAD 10-03 trial)

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients has shown promising results in non-randomized trials. This is a multi-institutional phase II trial of NAT in resectable PDAC patients.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed resectable PDAC after agreement by two expert radiologists were eligible. Patients received three cycles of GEM (1000 mg/m²/week) plus daily erlotinib (ERL) (100 mg/day). After re-staging, patients without progressive disease underwent 5 weeks of therapy with GEM (300 mg/m²/week), ERL 100 mg/day and concomitant radiotherapy (45 Gy). Efficacy was assessed using tumor regression grade (TRG) and resection margin status. Using a single-arm Simon's design, considering the therapy not useful if R0 < 40% and useful if the R0 > 70% (alpha 5%, beta 10%), 24 patients needed to be recruited. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01389440.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Adverse effects of NAT were mainly mild gastrointestinal disorders. Resectability rate was 76%, with a R0 rate of 63.1% among the resected patients. Median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 23.8 (95% CI 11.4-36.2) and 12.8 months (95% CI 8.6-17.1), respectively. R0 resection patients had better median OS, compared with patients with R1 resection or not resected (65.5 months vs. 15.5 months, p = 0.01). N0 rate among the resected patients was 63.1%, and showed a longer median OS (65.5 vs. 15.2 months, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study confirm promising oncologic results with NAT for patients with resectable PDAC. Therefore, the present trial supports the development of phase II randomized trials comparing NAT vs. upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer.

Evolution of pancreatectomy with en bloc venous resection for pancreatic cancer in Italy. Retrospective cohort study on 425 cases in 10 pancreatic referral units

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to analyze the evolution of pancreatectomy with venous resection in 10 referral Italian centers in the last 25 years.

METHODS

A multicenter database of 425 patients submitted to pancreatectomy with venous resection between 1991 and 2015 was retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified in 5 periods: 1 (1991-1995); 2 (1996-2000); 3 (2001-2005); 4 (2006-2010); 5 (2011-2015). Indications and outcomes were compared according to the period of surgery.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were operated in period 1, 28 in period 2, 91 in period 3, 140 in period 4, and 147 in period 5. Use of neoadjuvant therapy increased from 0% in period 1 and 2-12.1% in period 5. Postoperative complications ranged from 46.3% to 67.8%, and mortality from 5.3% to 9.2%. Median survival progressively increased, from 6 months in period 1-16 months in period 2, 24 months in period 3 and 4 and 35 months in period 5 (p = 0.004). Period, venous and nodal invasion were significant prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSION

Management and outcomes of pancreatectomy with venous resection have evolved in the last 25 years in Italy. Improvement in patients' multidisciplinary management has lead to significant improvement of median survival.

Do patients with pancreatic body or tail cancer benefit from adjuvant therapy?A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Evidence supporting adjuvant therapy for resected pancreatic cancer is limited primarily to head tumors. We analyzed data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate the relationship of tumor site with benefit from adjunctive (adjuvant, neoadjuvant, perioperative) therapy (Rx).

METHODS

All NCDB patients with clinical stage I and II pancreatic cancer, diagnosed from 2003 to 2013, who underwent surgical resection and had data on site of primary were included. Overall survival (OS) analyses with hazard ratios (HR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and two-sided p-values are presented.

RESULTS

A total of 27,930 patients met inclusion criteria; median age 66 years, 51% males, 86% white. Primary site was coded as head (74.4%), body (9.3%), or tail (16.3%). Pathologic stage was predominantly stage II (77%); 81% had negative margins. Perioperative Rx was used in 4%, neoadjuvant in 8%, adjuvant in 48%. Median OS for the cohort was 24 months; for head, body and tail tumors, it was 21.6, 34.5, and 42.5 months, respectively. In univariable analyses, adjunctive Rx was associated with improved OS in head tumors (HR, any Rx vs. no Rx: 0.87; 95% CI 0.84-0.91; p < 0.0001) but not in body (1.82; 1.59-2.08; <0.0001) and tail (2.28; 2.05-2.53; <0.0001) tumors; multivariable models including statistically significant predictors (Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, tumor grade and stage, positive resection margin) confirmed these results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the benefit of adjunctive Rx is restricted to pancreatic head tumors; body and tail tumors have a much better prognosis. These results warrant further evaluation in prospective studies.

Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment in Pancreatic Malignancies: Where Are We?

Since the advent of modern surgery for pancreatic cancer, clinicians have recognized this cancer's propensity to recur locally, metastasize, and cause death. Despite significant efforts to improve patient outcomes with better adjuvant therapy, only modest gains in survival have been observed. An alternative strategy of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery has the potential to improve patient selection and survival, and expand the pool of patients eligible for curative surgery. This article summarizes large, randomized trials of adjuvant therapy, explains the limitations imposed by up-front surgery, and suggests neoadjuvant therapy as a rational alternative to initial surgery and adjuvant therapy.

Timing of Pancreatic Resection and Patient Outcomes: Is There a Difference?

Rates of long-term survival after treatment of pancreatic cancer remain low, in part because most patients are still treated with primary resection. This approach is often inadequate because of early local control failures, early manifestation of metastatic disease because of the unrecognized and untreated systemic component of this disease, and because half of patients never receive multimodal therapy. Preoperative therapy can be used to improve local control and treat the systemic nature of pancreatic cancer while also selecting for patients who benefit from a morbid operation. Preoperative therapy makes sense for most patients with this aggressive and deadly disease.

Prognostic impact of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level at diagnosis in resected stage I-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a U.S. population study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a highly aggressive cancer, with surgical resection and systemic therapy offering the only hope for long-term survival. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) has been used as a prognostic marker after resection; however, the relationship between survival and pre-treatment CA 19-9 level remains unclear. This study evaluates pre-treatment serum CA 19-9 level as a predictor for long-term survival.

METHODS

The U.S. National Cancer Data Base [2004-2012] was reviewed for patients with clinical stages I-III resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma with recorded pre-treatment CA 19-9 levels (U/mL). Kaplan Meier and Weibull survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Four thousand seven hundred and one patients were included: 12.6% received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), 27.4% underwent surgery, and 60.1% underwent surgery and adjuvant therapy. Amongst those who underwent initial surgery, there was no association between CA 19-9 levels ≤800 (≤100, 101-300, 301-500, 501-800) with survival (stage I P=0.7592, stage II P=0.5088, stage III P=0.9037). Levels >800 were associated with significantly worse survival in all stages (P≤0.0001, all). Amongst those who received NAT, levels >800 were associated with worse survival in early (stage I P=0.0001), but not advanced stage disease (stage II P=0.1891, stage III P=0.9316). In multivariable analyses, levels >800 demonstrated a 3.29 greater hazard of mortality with respect to patients with levels ≤100 (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-treatment CA 19-9 levels >800 appear to be associated with advanced disease, and are negatively associated with long-term survival. However, levels ≤800 had no significant association with survival. Although this study suggests an association, further study is needed to evaluate whether patients with CA 19-9 levels >800 benefit from NAT.

Prognostic Significance of New AJCC Tumor Stage in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy

The American Joint Committee for Cancer has adopted a size-based T stage system (eighth edition) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), defined as follows: pT1≤2 cm (pT1a≤0.5 cm, pT1b>0.5 and<1 cm, and pT1c 1-2 cm); pT2>2 and ≤4 cm; and pT3> 4 cm. However, the prognostic value of this new T staging system has not been validated in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) after neoadjuvant therapy. In this study, we analyzed 398 PDAC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and PD at our institution from 1999 to 2012. The results were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and survival. The new T stage correlated with lymph nodes metastasis (P<0.001), tumor response grade (P<0.001), disease-free survival (DFS, P<0.001) and overall survival (OS, P<0.001). None of the patients with ypT0 had recurrence or died of disease. Among the patients with ypT1 disease, patients with ypT1a and ypT1b had better DFS (P=0.046) and OS (P=0.03) than those with ypT1c. However, there was no significant difference in either DFS or OS between ypT1c and ypT2 or between ypT2 and ypT3 groups (P>0.05). In multivariate analysis, new ypT3 stage was associated with shorter OS (P=0.04), but not DFS (P=0.16). Our results show that the new ypT stage better stratify survival than the ypT stage in American Joint Committee for Cancer seventh edition for PDAC patients who received PD after neoadjuvant therapy, and that tumor size cutoff of 1.0 cm work better for ypT2 than the proposed tumor size cutoff of 2.0 cm in this group of patients.

Recent Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery

OPINION STATEMENT

Pancreatic cancer surgery is a continuously evolving field. Despite tremendous advances in perioperative outcomes, pancreatic resection is still associated with substantial morbidity, and mortality is not nil. Institutional caseload is a well-established determinant of patient outcomes, and centralization to experienced centers is essential to the safety and oncological appropriateness of the resection. Minimally invasive approaches are increasingly applied for pancreatic resection, even in cancer patients. Nevertheless, the level of evidence in this field remains low. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy appears potentially beneficial towards some perioperative outcomes, although its oncological results remain incompletely studied. Data regarding perioperative and oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple's resection) is even less mature, but suggest that similar results as the open approach can be achieved in selected, high-volume centers. Conversely, its indiscriminate adoption by inexperienced surgeons and institutions has potential deleterious effects given its steep learning curve. Newer neoadjuvant treatment protocols display enhanced ability to downstage advanced tumors, increasing candidates for potentially curative surgery. Conversely, putative benefits of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with technically resectable tumors have not been reliably demonstrated and its optimal indications remain highly controversial.