A network meta-analysis of updated haemostatic strategies for hysterectomy

Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacological Treatment in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disabling condition that usually affects the extremities after trauma or surgery. At present, there is no FDA-approved pharmacological treatment for patients with CRPS. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological therapies and determine the best strategy for CRPS. We searched the databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov, for published eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological treatment with placebo in CRPS patients. Target patients were diagnosed with CRPS according to Budapest Criteria in 2012 or the 1994 consensus-based IASP CRPS criteria. Finally, 23 RCTs comprising 1029 patients were included. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate certainty (confidence in evidence and quality of evidence). Direct meta-analysis showed that using bisphosphonates (BPs) (mean difference [MD] -2.21, 95% CI -4.36--0.06, p = 0.04, moderate certainty) or ketamine (mean difference [MD] -0.78, 95% CI -1.51--0.05, p = 0.04, low certainty) could provide long-term (beyond one month) pain relief. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of short-term pain relief. Ketamine (rank p = 0.55) and BPs (rank p = 0.61) appeared to be the best strategies for CRPS pain relief. Additionally, BPs (risk ratio [RR] = 1.86, 95% CI 1.34-2.57, p < 0.01, moderate certainty) and ketamine (risk ratio [RR] = 3.45, 95% CI 1.79-6.65, p < 0.01, moderate certainty) caused more adverse events, which were mild, and no special intervention was required. In summary, among pharmacological interventions, ketamine and bisphosphonate injection seemed to be the best treatment for CRPS without severe adverse events.

Efficacy of Regimens in the Treatment of Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults: A Network Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is a highly heterogeneous autoimmune condition with clinical and genetic characteristics that fall between those of type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus; therefore, there are no uniform criteria for the selection of therapeutic agents. We conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of various therapeutic agents for LADA by comparing their effects on various indicators used to reflect LADA.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science databases from their inception to March 2023 and collected data from 14 randomized controlled trials on glucose-lowering drugs for LADA, including 23 studies and 15 treatment regimens. The effectiveness of drugs was ranked and evaluated by combining surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) plots and forest plots. Factors that may influence study heterogeneity were also searched and analyzed by combining subgroup analysis, publication bias, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

The results of the network meta-analysis showed that insulin had the most significant effect on the control of change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin, type A1 (ΔHbA1c). Insulin combined with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors performed the best in reducing fasting blood glucose and body mass index. Treatment regimens involving thiazolidinediones were the most advantageous in HbA1c, fasting C-peptide and postprandial C-peptide control. Longer dosing may be more beneficial in maintaining islet β-cell function in the LADA population.

CONCLUSION

LADA is an immune condition with high heterogeneity, and treatment should be administered according to the C-peptide level of the LADA population. For this population with LADA with a certain level of β-cell function, combinations of insulin with DPP-4 inhibitors or thiazolidinediones probably can be more effective treatment options to maintain islet function and normal blood glucose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023410795.

Electrothermal Vessel Sealing Versus Conventional Suturing in Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomised Trial

INTRODUCTION

The present randomised controlled trial was conducted to compare haemostatic efficiency, operative time, and overall performance of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) system with conventional suturing in abdominal hysterectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The trial was designed with standard parallel arms, i.e., vessel sealing and suture ligature arms. Sixty patients were block randomised into either arms with 30 patients in each. A hand-held vessel sealing instrument was used to perform a hysterectomy in the vessel sealing arm and the quality of the uterine artery seal achieved at the first attempt was graded on an ordinal scale of 1-3 to quantify haemostatic efficiency. Operative time, intra-operative blood loss, and peri-operative complications were compared between the two arms.

RESULTS

Significantly reduced mean operative time (26.97±8.92 vs 33.67±8.62 minutes; p=0.005) and intra-operative blood loss (111±53.31 mL vs 320±193.90 mL; p=0.001) was observed in the Vessel Sealing Arm compared to Suture Ligature Arm. Of total 60 uterine seals (from bilateral uterine artery transaction in 30 hysterectomies in the Vessel Sealing Arm), 83.34% were Level 1 with Complete Seal and no residual bleeding, 8.33% were Level 2 or Partial Seals with minimal bleeding, requiring the use of vessel sealers for a second time, while 8.33% had Seal Failure (Level 3) with significant bleeding requiring additional re-security of stumps with sutures. Modal pain scores on the first three postoperative days and duration of hospital stay were significantly less in the Vessel Sealer Arm, reflecting reduced postoperative morbidity. Outcomes were comparable across operators.

CONCLUSION

Vessel Sealing System gives superior surgical results with lesser operative time, minimal blood loss, and reduced morbidity.

Bipolar Vessel Sealing System Versus Suture Ligation in Selective Neck Dissection

Aim

To evaluate whether the use of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system reduces the blood loss and operating time, with lesser complications as compared to suture ligation in selective neck dissection in patients with oral cancer.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of our institute from January 2015 to December 2016. The sample consisted of 60 patients, divided into Groups I and II with 30 subjects in each. In Group I electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and in Group II suture ligation were used. The outcome measures recorded were: blood loss, operating time, quality of surgical field, postoperative pain on days 1, 2, and 3, drainage volume at 24, 48, and 72 h, edema, complications, and duration of hospital stay.

Results

There were 36 males and 24 females with a mean age of 50.76 ± 12.6 years. Blood loss was significantly less for Group I than for Group II (p = 0.001); the operating time was significantly less in Group I than in Group II (p = 0.001); Group I had better quality of surgical field (p = 0.001); less pain on postoperative evening, day 2 and day 3 (p < 0.05); and less drainage volume at 24 and 48 h (p < 0.05). Postoperative edema, complications, need for perioperative blood transfusion, and duration of hospital stay postsurgery were similar in both groups.

Conclusion

The electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer was efficacious in terms of reducing blood loss and operating time while providing a better surgical field and patient compliance without increasing the perioperative morbidity.