1
|
Samuelsson A, Bock D, Prytz M, Ehrencrona C, Wedin A, Angenete E, Haglind E. Long-Term Results After Laparoscopic Lavage for Perforated Diverticulitis Purulent Peritonitis in Sweden: A Population-Based Observational Study. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2024; 5:e433. [PMID: 38911640 PMCID: PMC11191994 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare long-term outcomes after laparoscopic lavage with resection surgery for perforated diverticulitis, Hinchey grade III as practiced in Sweden for 3 years. Background Laparoscopic lavage has been studied in 3 randomized controlled trials. Long-term results indicate that additional surgery and a remaining stoma are less common after lavage compared with resection, but data from routine care and larger cohorts are needed to get a more complete picture. Methods LapLav is a national cohort study with nearly complete coverage of all patients operated in Sweden between 2016 and 2018. The cohort was retrieved from the national patient register by a definition based on the Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10 code plus the surgical procedural code. All medical records have been reviewed and data retrieved in addition to registry data. Propensity score with inverse probability weighting was used to balance the 2 groups, that is, laparoscopic lavage vs resection surgery. Results Before the propensity score was applied, the cohort consisted of 499 patients. Additional surgery was more common in the resection group [odds ratio, 0.714; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.529-0.962; P = 0.0271]. Mortality did not differ between the groups (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI = 0.69-2.07; P = 0.516). In the lavage group, 27% of patients went on to have resection surgery. Conclusions In Swedish routine care, laparoscopic lavage was feasible and safe for the surgical treatment of perforated diverticulitis, Hinchey grade III. Our results indicate that laparoscopic lavage can be used as a first-choice treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Samuelsson
- From the Department of Surgery, SSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, NU-hospital Group, Region Västra Götaland, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - David Bock
- From the Department of Surgery, SSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- BioPharma Early Biometrics and Statistical Innovation, Data Science & AI, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mattias Prytz
- Department of Surgery, NU-hospital Group, Region Västra Götaland, Trollhättan, Sweden
- Department of Research and Development, NU-Hospital group, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - Carolina Ehrencrona
- From the Department of Surgery, SSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anette Wedin
- From the Department of Surgery, SSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva Angenete
- From the Department of Surgery, SSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva Haglind
- From the Department of Surgery, SSORG – Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Agresta F, Montori G, Podda M, Ortenzi M, Giordano A, Bergamini C, Mazzarolo G, Licitra E, Gobbi T, Procida G, Borgo AD, Botteri E, Ansaloni L, Fugazzola P, Savino G, Guerrieri M, Campanile FC, Sartori A, Petz W, Silecchia G, di Saverio S, Catena F, Agrusa A, Salemi M, Morales-Conde S, Arezzo A. Diverticulitis, surgery, evidence-based medicine, and the Steve Jobs' dots: a narrative review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024; 50:81-91. [PMID: 37747500 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02362-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Emergency treatment of acute diverticulitis remains a hazy field. Despite a number of clinical studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), guidelines and surgical societies recommendations, the most critical hot topics have yet to be addressed. METHODS Literature research from 1963 until today was performed. Data regarding the principal RCTs and observational studies were summarized in descriptive tables. In particular we aimed to focus on the following topics: the role of laparoscopy, the acute care setting, the RCTs, guidelines, observational studies and classifications proposed by literature, the problem in case of a pandemic, and the importance of adapting treatment /place/surgeon conditions. RESULTS In the evaluation of these points we did not try to find any prospective evolution of the concepts achievements. On the contrary we simply report the individuals strands of research from a retrospective point of view, similarly to what Steve Jobes said: "you can't connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards. So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future". We have finally obtained what can be defined "a narrative review of the literature on diverticulitis". CONCLUSIONS Not only evidence-based medicine but also the contextualization, as also the role of 'competent' surgeons, should guide to novel approach in acute diverticulitis management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinando Agresta
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Giulia Montori
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy.
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Monica Ortenzi
- Clinica di Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessio Giordano
- Surgery Department, Emergency Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlo Bergamini
- Surgery Department, Emergency Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Giorgio Mazzarolo
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Edelweiss Licitra
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Tobia Gobbi
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Giuseppa Procida
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Andrea Dal Borgo
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | | | - Luca Ansaloni
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Grazia Savino
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Clinica di Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Sartori
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale di Montebelluna, Montebelluna, Italy
| | - Wanda Petz
- Division of Digestive Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Silecchia
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University La Sapienza of Rome, Latina, Italy
| | - Salomone di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery, ASUR Marche, AV5, Hospital of San Benedetto del Tronto, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Surgery, "Bufalini" Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Antonino Agrusa
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Disciplines, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Michelangelo Salemi
- Medical Director of ULSS 2Trevigiana, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gachabayov M, Kajmolli A, Quintero L, Felsenreich DM, Popa DE, Ignjatovic D, Bergamaschi R. Inadvertent laparoscopic lavage of perforated colon cancer: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:35. [PMID: 38197963 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03224-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis has been grabbing the headlines, it is known that the clinical presentation of peritonitis can also be caused by an underlying perforated carcinoma. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of patients undergoing inadvertent laparoscopic lavage of perforated colon cancer as well as the delay in cancer diagnosis. METHODS The PubMed database was systematically searched to include all studies meeting inclusion criteria. Studies were screened through titles and abstracts with potentially eligible studies undergoing full-text screening. The primary endpoints of this meta-analysis were the rates of perforated colon cancer patients having undergone inadvertent laparoscopic lavage as well as the delay in cancer diagnosis. This was expressed in pooled rate % and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Eleven studies (three randomized, two prospective, six retrospective) totaling 642 patients met inclusion criteria. Eight studies reported how patients were screened for cancer and the number of patients who completed follow-up. The pooled cancer rate was 3.4% (0.9%, 5.8%) with low heterogeneity (Isquare2 = 34.02%) in eight studies. Cancer rates were 8.2% (0%, 3%) (Isquare2 = 58.2%) and 1.7% (0%, 4.5%) (Isquare2 = 0%) in prospective and retrospective studies, respectively. Randomized trials reported a cancer rate of 7.2% (3.1%, 11.2%) with low among-study heterogeneity (Isquare2 = 0%) and a median delay to diagnosis of 2 (1.5-5) months. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review found that 7% of patients undergoing laparoscopic lavage for peritonitis had perforated colon cancer with a delay to diagnosis of up to 5 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahir Gachabayov
- Department of Surgery, Jacobi Medical Center, New York City Health Hospitals, Building 1, Suite 610, 1400 Pelham Parkway S, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Agon Kajmolli
- Department of Surgery, Jacobi Medical Center, New York City Health Hospitals, Building 1, Suite 610, 1400 Pelham Parkway S, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Luis Quintero
- Department of Surgery, Jacobi Medical Center, New York City Health Hospitals, Building 1, Suite 610, 1400 Pelham Parkway S, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Daniel M Felsenreich
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dorin E Popa
- Department of General Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Dejan Ignjatovic
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, Lorenskog, Norway
| | - Roberto Bergamaschi
- Department of Surgery, Jacobi Medical Center, New York City Health Hospitals, Building 1, Suite 610, 1400 Pelham Parkway S, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pavlidis ET, Pavlidis TE. Current Aspects on the Management of Perforated Acute Diverticulitis: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e28446. [PMID: 36176861 PMCID: PMC9509703 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Unhealthy nutritional habits and the current western lifestyle have led to an increased incidence of acute diverticulitis, which mainly affects older patients. However, the disease course in younger patients might be more severe. It has a continued increase in surgical practice, as it is the most common clinical condition encountered in the emergencies. Diagnosis and management have changed over the past decade. C-reactive protein > 170 mg/L represents the cut-off point between moderate and severe diverticulitis, and a CT scan is mandatory. It demands urgent surgical management and has high morbidity and mortality rate, especially in immunosuppressed patients, reaching up to 25%. According to the contemporary guidelines, there have been certain indications for conservative management and re-evaluation (administration of antibiotics, CT-guided drainage of the abscess, when it is > 4 cm). They include pericolic air bubbles or a small amount of fluid, absence of abscess within a distance of 5 cm from the affected bowel or abscess ≤4 cm. In other cases, Hartmann's sigmoidectomy is the procedure of choice. An alternative choice, nowadays, is resection and primary anastomosis with or without diverting stoma, especially in younger patients. Laparoscopic lavage only versus primary resection has been performed in severe cases of Hinchey III or IV. Damage control surgery, possible open abdomen, and reoperation are recommended in severe sepsis. Hinchey's classification may not be absolutely adequate, and several modifications have been proposed. Current classification criteria (CRP, qSOFA score) are more appropriate. The decision-making must be individualized depending on the hemodynamic status (septic shock), age, comorbidity, immune status, intraoperative findings, and MPI (Mannheim peritonitis index).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efstathios T Pavlidis
- 2nd Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, GRC
| | - Theodoros E Pavlidis
- 2nd Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, GRC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Samuelsson A, Bock D, Prytz M, Block M, Ehrencrona C, Wedin A, Ahlstedt M, Angenete E, Haglind E. Laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis in the LapLav study: population-based registry study. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1236-1242. [PMID: 34148084 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard treatment for Hinchey III perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis was resection with or without a stoma, but recent trials have shown that laparoscopic lavage is a reasonable alternative. This registry-based Swedish study investigated results at a national level to assess safety in real-world scenarios. METHODS Patients in Sweden who underwent emergency surgery for perforated diverticulitis between 2016 and 2018 were studied. Inverse probability weighting by propensity score was used to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS A total of 499 patients were included in this study. Laparoscopic lavage was associated with a significantly lower 90-day Comprehensive Complication Index (20.9 versus 32.0; odds ratio 0.77, 95 per cent compatibility interval (c.i.) 0.61 to 0.97) and overall duration of hospital stay (9 versus 15 days; ratio of means 0.84, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.96) compared with resection. Patients had 82 (95 per cent c.i. 39 to 140) per cent more readmissions following lavage than resection (27.2 versus 21.0 per cent), but similar reoperation rates. More co-morbidity was noted among patients who underwent resection than those who had laparoscopic lavage. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic lavage is safe in routine care beyond trial evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Samuelsson
- Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, NU-Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden.,Department of Research and Development, NU-Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Prytz
- Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, NU-Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden.,Department of Research and Development, NU-Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - M Block
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - C Ehrencrona
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - A Wedin
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Ahlstedt
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Haglind
- Department of Surgery, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Matsuoka T, Ichihara N, Shinozaki H, Kobayashi K, Lefor AK, Kimura T, Kitagawa Y, Kakeji Y, Miyata H, Sasaki J. Antithrombotic drugs have a minimal effect on intraoperative blood loss during emergency surgery for generalized peritonitis: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:27. [PMID: 34044868 PMCID: PMC8162009 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00374-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The effect of antithrombotic drugs on intraoperative operative blood loss volume in patients undergoing emergency surgery for generalized peritonitis is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of antithrombotic drugs on intraoperative blood loss in patients with generalized peritonitis using a nationwide surgical registry in Japan. Method This retrospective cohort study used a nationwide surgical registry data from 2011 to 2017 in Japan. Propensity score matching for the use of antithrombotic drugs was used for the adjustment of age, gender, comorbidities, frailty, preoperative state, types of surgery, surgical approach, laboratory data, and others. The main outcome was intraoperative blood loss: comparison of intraoperative blood loss, ratio of intraoperative blood loss after adjusted for confounding factors, and variable importance of all covariates. Results A total of 70,105 of the eligible 75,666 patients were included in this study, and 2947 patients were taking antithrombotic drugs. Propensity score matching yielded 2864 well-balanced pairs. The blood loss volume was slightly higher in the antithrombotic drug group (100 [10–349] vs 70 [10–299] ml). After adjustment for confounding factors, the use of antithrombotic drugs was related to a 1.30-fold increase in intraoperative blood loss compared to non-use of antithrombotic drugs (95% CI, 1.16–1.45). The variable importance revealed that the effect of the use of antithrombotic drugs was minimal compared with surgical approach or type of surgery. Conclusion This study shows that while taking antithrombotic drugs is associated with a slight increase in intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing emergency surgery for generalized peritonitis, the effect is likely of minimal clinical significance. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-021-00374-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadashi Matsuoka
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinkjuku, Tokyo, 164-8582, Japan. .,Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
| | - Nao Ichihara
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kenji Kobayashi
- Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
| | | | - Toshimoto Kimura
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Database Committee, The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Sasaki
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinkjuku, Tokyo, 164-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Madiedo A, Hall J. Minimally Invasive Management of Diverticular Disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34:113-120. [PMID: 33642951 PMCID: PMC7904339 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Traditionally, management of complicated diverticular disease has involved open damage control operations with large definitive resections and colostomies. Studies are now showing that in a subset of patients who would typically have undergone an open Hartmann's procedure for Hinchey III/IV diverticulitis, a laparoscopic approach is equally safe, and has better outcomes. Similar patients may be good candidates for primary anastomosis to avoid the morbidity and subsequent reversal of a colostomy. While most operations for diverticulitis across the country are still performed open, there has been an incremental shift in practice toward minimally invasive approaches in the elective setting. The most recent data from large trials, most notably the SIGMA trial, found laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy is associated with fewer short-term and long-term complications, decreased pain, improvement in length of stay, and maintains better cost-effectiveness than open resections. Some studies even demonstrate that robotic sigmoid resections can maintain a similar if not more reduction in morbidity as the laparoscopic approach while still remaining cost-effective. Intraoperative approaches also factor into improving outcomes. One of the most feared complications in colorectal surgery is anastomotic leak, and many studies have sought to find ways to minimize this risk. Factors to consider to minimize incidence of leak are the creation of tension-free anastomoses, amount of contamination, adequacy of blood supply, and a patient's use of steroids. Techniques supported by data that decrease anastomotic leaks include preoperative oral antibiotic and mechanical bowel prep, intraoperative splenic flexure mobilization, low-tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery, and use of indocyanine green immunofluorescence to assess perfusion. In summary, the management of benign diverticular disease is shifting from open, morbid operations for a very common disease to a minimally invasive approach. In this article, we review those approaches shown to have better outcomes, greater patient satisfaction, and fewer complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Madiedo
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason Hall
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kiely MX, Yao M, Chen L. Laparoscopic Lavage in the Management of Hinchey III/IV Diverticulitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34:104-112. [PMID: 33642950 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Diverticulitis manifestations may cover a spectrum of mild local inflammation to diffuse feculent peritonitis. Up to 35% of patients presenting with diverticulitis will have purulent (Hinchey grade III) or feculent (Hinchey grade IV) contamination of the abdomen, with a high-associated morbidity and mortality. Surgical management may involve segmental resection with or without restoration of bowel continuity. However, emergency resection for diverticulitis can be associated with high mortality rates, as well as low stoma reversal rates at 1 year. Therefore, laparoscopic peritoneal lavage has been proposed for use in selected patients with purulent peritonitis. The topic of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis in the literature has been controversial. Our review of the recent data show that laparoscopic lavage may be safe and feasible in select patients with similar rates of mortality and major morbidity. There is, however, a concern regarding an associated higher rate of postoperative abscess and early reintervention risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria X Kiely
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mengdi Yao
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lilian Chen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Azhar N, Johanssen A, Sundström T, Folkesson J, Wallon C, Kørner H, Blecic L, Forsmo HM, Øresland T, Yaqub S, Buchwald P, Schultz JK. Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: Long-term Outcomes From the Scandinavian Diverticulitis (SCANDIV) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:121-127. [PMID: 33355658 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance Perforated colonic diverticulitis usually requires surgical resection, with significant morbidity. Short-term results from randomized clinical trials have indicated that laparoscopic lavage is a feasible alternative to resection. However, it appears that no long-term results are available. Objective To compare long-term (5-year) outcomes of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and primary resection as treatments of perforated purulent diverticulitis. Design, Setting, and Participants This international multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in 21 hospitals in Sweden and Norway, which enrolled patients between February 2010 and June 2014. Long-term follow-up was conducted between March 2018 and November 2019. Patients with symptoms of left-sided acute perforated diverticulitis, indicating urgent surgical need and computed tomography-verified free air, were eligible. Those available for trial intervention (Hinchey stages <IV) were included in the long-term follow-up. Interventions Patients were assigned to undergo laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or colon resection based on computer-generated, center-stratified block randomization. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was severe complications within 5 years. Secondary outcomes included mortality, secondary operations, recurrences, stomas, functional outcomes, and quality of life. Results Of 199 randomized patients, 101 were assigned to undergo laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and 98 were assigned to colon resection. At the time of surgery, perforated purulent diverticulitis was confirmed in 145 patients randomized to lavage (n = 74) and resection (n = 71). The median follow-up was 59 (interquartile range, 51-78; full range, 0-110) months, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving a final analysis of 73 patients who had had laparoscopic lavage (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [13] years; 39 men [53%]) and 69 who had received a resection (mean [SD] age, 63.5 [14] years; 36 men [52%]). Severe complications occurred in 36% (n = 26) in the laparoscopic lavage group and 35% (n = 24) in the resection group (P = .92). Overall mortality was 32% (n = 23) in the laparoscopic lavage group and 25% (n = 17) in the resection group (P = .36). The stoma prevalence was 8% (n = 4) in the laparoscopic lavage group vs 33% (n = 17; P = .002) in the resection group among patients who remained alive, and secondary operations, including stoma reversal, were performed in 36% (n = 26) vs 35% (n = 24; P = .92), respectively. Recurrence of diverticulitis was higher following laparoscopic lavage (21% [n = 15] vs 4% [n = 3]; P = .004). In the laparoscopic lavage group, 30% (n = 21) underwent a sigmoid resection. There were no significant differences in the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire or Cleveland Global Quality of Life scores between the groups. Conclusions and Relevance Long-term follow-up showed no differences in severe complications. Recurrence of diverticulitis after laparoscopic lavage was more common, often leading to sigmoid resection. This must be weighed against the lower stoma prevalence in this group. Shared decision-making considering both short-term and long-term consequences is encouraged. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01047462.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najia Azhar
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anette Johanssen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Tove Sundström
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Joakim Folkesson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Conny Wallon
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Hartvig Kørner
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ljiljana Blecic
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Østfold Hospital, Fredrikstad, Norway
| | - Håvard Mjørud Forsmo
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Emergency Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Tom Øresland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheraz Yaqub
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pamela Buchwald
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lauro A, Pozzi E, Vaccari S, Cervellera M, Tonini V. Drains, Germs, or Steel: Multidisciplinary Management of Acute Colonic Diverticulitis. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65:3463-3476. [PMID: 32980955 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06621-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The medical and surgical management of uncomplicated diverticulitis has changed over the last several years. Although immunocompetent patients or those without comorbidities can be treated with antibiotics as an outpatient, the efficacy of high-fiber intake or drugs such as mesalamine or rifaximin is not yet clearly established in the treatment of acute episodes and in the prevention of recurrences. On the other hand, the choice between antibiotic treatment and percutaneous drainage is not always obvious in diverticulitis complicated by abscess formation, especially for larger abscesses; although the results of studies comparing the two approaches remain controversial, surgery must be pursued for abscesses > 8 cm. For emergency surgery, the debate is still ongoing regarding laparoscopic lavage and surgical resection followed by primary anastomosis, since for both approaches the published reports are not in agreement regarding possible benefits. Therefore, these approaches are recommended only for selected patients under the care of experienced surgeons. Also, the contribution of elective surgery toward the overall approach has been revised; currently, it is reserved primarily for patients with a high risk of recurrence and whenever more conservative treatments were not effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto Lauro
- Emergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eleonora Pozzi
- Emergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Samuele Vaccari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Umberto I University Hospital - La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maurizio Cervellera
- Emergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valeria Tonini
- Emergency Surgery Department, St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nascimbeni R, Amato A, Cirocchi R, Serventi A, Laghi A, Bellini M, Tellan G, Zago M, Scarpignato C, Binda GA. Management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis. A multidisciplinary review and position paper. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 25:153-165. [PMID: 33155148 PMCID: PMC7884367 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02346-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Perforated diverticulitis is an emergent clinical condition and its management is challenging and still debated. The aim of this position paper was to critically review the available evidence on the management of perforated diverticulitis and generalized peritonitis in order to provide evidence-based suggestions for a management strategy. Four Italian scientific societies (SICCR, SICUT, SIRM, AIGO), selected experts who identified 5 clinically relevant topics in the management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis that would benefit from a multidisciplinary review. The following 5 issues were tackled: 1) Criteria to decide between conservative and surgical treatment in case of perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis; 2) Criteria or scoring system to choose the most appropriate surgical option when diffuse peritonitis is confirmed 3); The appropriate surgical procedure in hemodynamically stable or stabilized patients with diffuse peritonitis; 4) The appropriate surgical procedure for patients with generalized peritonitis and septic shock and 5) Optimal medical therapy in patients with generalized peritonitis from diverticular perforation before and after surgery. In perforated diverticulitis surgery is indicated in case of diffuse peritonitis or failure of conservative management and the decision to operate is not based on the presence of extraluminal air. If diffuse peritonitis is confirmed the choice of surgical technique is based on intraoperative findings and the presence or risk of severe septic shock. Further prognostic factors to consider are physiological derangement, age, comorbidities, and immune status. In hemodynamically stable patients, emergency laparoscopy has benefits over open surgery. Options include resection and anastomosis, Hartmann’s procedure or laparoscopic lavage. In generalized peritonitis with septic shock, an open surgical approach is preferred. Non-restorative resection and/or damage control surgery appear to be the only viable options, depending on the severity of hemodynamic instability. Multidisciplinary medical management should be applied with the main aims of controlling infection, relieving postoperative pain and preventing and/or treating postoperative ileus. In conclusion, the complexity and diversity of patients with diverticular perforation and diffuse peritonitis requires a personalized strategy, involving a thorough classification of physiological derangement, staging of intra-abdominal infection and choice of the most appropriate surgical procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Nascimbeni
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
| | - A Amato
- Unit of Coloproctology, Department of Surgery, Borea Hospital, Sanremo, Italy
| | - R Cirocchi
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - A Serventi
- Department of Surgery, Galliano Hospital, Acqui Terme, Italy
| | - A Laghi
- Department of Surgical-Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - M Bellini
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Tellan
- Department of Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Clinical Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - M Zago
- Department of Robotic and Emergency Surgery, Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - C Scarpignato
- Department of Health Sciences, United Campus of Malta, Msida, Malta
- Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, ShaTin, Hong Kong
| | - G A Binda
- General Surgery, Biomedical Institute, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schultz JK, Azhar N, Binda GA, Barbara G, Biondo S, Boermeester MA, Chabok A, Consten ECJ, van Dijk ST, Johanssen A, Kruis W, Lambrichts D, Post S, Ris F, Rockall TA, Samuelsson A, Di Saverio S, Tartaglia D, Thorisson A, Winter DC, Bemelman W, Angenete E. European Society of Coloproctology: guidelines for the management of diverticular disease of the colon. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22 Suppl 2:5-28. [PMID: 32638537 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The goal of this European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) guideline project is to give an overview of the existing evidence on the management of diverticular disease, primarily as a guidance to surgeons. METHODS The guideline was developed during several working phases including three voting rounds and one consensus meeting. The two project leads (JKS and EA) appointed by the ESCP guideline committee together with one member of the guideline committee (WB) agreed on the methodology, decided on six themes for working groups (WGs) and drafted a list of research questions. Senior WG members, mostly colorectal surgeons within the ESCP, were invited based on publication records and geographical aspects. Other specialties were included in the WGs where relevant. In addition, one trainee or PhD fellow was invited in each WG. All six WGs revised the research questions if necessary, did a literature search, created evidence tables where feasible, and drafted supporting text to each research question and statement. The text and statement proposals from each WG were arranged as one document by the first and last authors before online voting by all authors in two rounds. For the second voting ESCP national representatives were also invited. More than 90% agreement was considered a consensus. The final phrasing of the statements with < 90% agreement was discussed in a consensus meeting at the ESCP annual meeting in Vienna in September 2019. Thereafter, the first and the last author drafted the final text of the guideline and circulated it for final approval and for a third and final online voting of rephrased statements. RESULTS This guideline contains 38 evidence based consensus statements on the management of diverticular disease. CONCLUSION This international, multidisciplinary guideline provides an up to date summary of the current knowledge of the management of diverticular disease as a guidance for clinicians and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Schultz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - N Azhar
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - G A Binda
- Colorectal Surgery, BioMedical Institute, Genova, Italy
| | - G Barbara
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Biondo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery - Colorectal Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona and IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Chabok
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Centre for Clinical Research Uppsala University, Västmanlands Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S T van Dijk
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Johanssen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - W Kruis
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - D Lambrichts
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Post
- Mannheim Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - F Ris
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T A Rockall
- Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit (mattu), Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - A Samuelsson
- Department of Surgery, NU-Hospital Group, Region Västra Götaland, Trollhättan, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - S Di Saverio
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.,Department of General Surgery, ASST Sette Laghi, University Hospital of Varese, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - D Tartaglia
- Emergency Surgery Unit, New Santa Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Thorisson
- Department of Radiology, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden.,Centre for Clinical Research of Uppsala University, Västmanland's Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden
| | - D C Winter
- St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - W Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Operative approaches for Hinchey III diverticulitis include the Hartmann procedure, primary resection and anastomosis, and laparoscopic lavage. Several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have compared these approaches; however, results are conflicting and previous studies have not captured the complexity of balancing surgical risks and quality of life. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the optimal operative strategy for patients with Hinchey III sigmoid diverticulitis. DESIGN We developed a Markov cohort model, incorporating perioperative morbidity/mortality, emergency and elective reoperations, and quality-of-life weights. We derived model parameters from systematic reviews and meta-analyses, where possible. We performed a second-order Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis to account for joint uncertainty in model parameters. SETTING This study measured outcomes over patients' lifetime horizon. PATIENTS The base case was a simulated cohort of 65-year-old patients with Hinchey III diverticulitis. A scenario simulating a cohort of highly comorbid 80-year-old patients was also planned. INTERVENTIONS Hartmann procedure, primary resection and anastomosis (with or without diverting ileostomy), and laparoscopic lavage were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Quality-adjusted life years were the primary outcome measured. RESULTS Following surgery for Hinchey III diverticulitis, 39.5% of patients who underwent the Hartmann procedure, 14.3% of patients who underwent laparoscopic lavage, and 16.7% of patients who underwent primary resection and anastomosis had a stoma at 12 months. After applying quality-of-life weights, primary resection and anastomosis was the optimal operative strategy, yielding 18.0 quality-adjusted life years; laparoscopic lavage and the Hartmann procedure yielded 9.6 and 13.7 fewer quality-adjusted life months. A scenario analysis for elderly, highly comorbid patients could not be performed because of a lack of high-quality evidence to inform model parameters. LIMITATIONS This model required assumptions about the long-term postoperative course of patients who underwent laparoscopic lavage because few long-term data for this group have been published. CONCLUSIONS Although the Hartmann procedure is widely used for Hinchey III diverticulitis, when considering both surgical risks and quality of life, both laparoscopic lavage and primary resection and anastomosis provide greater quality-adjusted life years for patients with Hinchey III diverticulitis, and primary resection and anastomosis appears to be the optimal approach. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B223. ESTRATEGIA OPERATIVA ÓPTIMA EN DIVERTICULITIS HINCHEY III DE SIGMOIDES: UN ANÁLISIS DE DECISION: Los enfoques quirúrgicos para la diverticulitis Hinchey III incluyen el procedimiento de Hartmann, la resección primaria y anastomosis, y el lavado laparoscópico. Varios ensayos controlados aleatorios y metanálisis han comparado estos enfoques; sin embargo, los resultados son contradictorios y los estudios previos no han captado la complejidad de equilibrar los riesgos quirúrgicos y la calidad de vida.Determinar la estrategia operativa óptima para pacientes con diverticulitis Hinchey III de sigmoides.Desarrollamos un modelo de cohorte de Markov, incorporando morbilidad / mortalidad perioperatoria, reoperaciones electivas y de emergencia, y pesos de calidad de vida. Derivamos los parámetros del modelo de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis, cuando fue posible. Realizamos un análisis de sensibilidad probabilístico Monte Carlo de segundo orden para tener en cuenta la incertidumbre conjunta en los parámetros del modelo.Seguimiento de por vida.El caso base fue una cohorte simulada de pacientes de 65 años con diverticulitis de Hinchey III. También se planeó un escenario que simulaba una cohorte de pacientes de 80 años altamente comórbidos.Procedimiento de Hartmann, resección primaria y anastomosis (con o sin desviación de ileostomía) y lavado laparoscópico.Años de vida ajustados por calidad.Después de la cirugía para la diverticulitis de Hinchey III, el 39.5% de los pacientes que se sometieron al procedimiento de Hartmann, el 14.3% de los pacientes que se sometieron a un lavado laparoscópico, y el 16.7% de los pacientes que se sometieron a resección primaria y anastomosis tuvieron un estoma a los 12 meses. Después de aplicar el peso de la calidad de vida, la resección primaria y la anastomosis fueron la estrategia operativa óptima, que dio como resultado 18.0 años de vida ajustados en función de la calidad; el lavado laparoscópico y el procedimiento de Hartmann arrojaron 9.6 y 13.7 meses de vida ajustados en función de la calidad, respectivamente. No se pudo realizar un análisis de escenarios para pacientes de edad avanzada altamente comórbidos debido a la falta de evidencia de alta calidad para informar los parámetros del modelo.Este modelo requirió suposiciones sobre el curso postoperatorio a largo plazo de pacientes que se sometieron a lavado laparoscópico, ya que se han publicado pocos datos a largo plazo para este grupo.Aunque el procedimiento de Hartmann se usa ampliamente para la diverticulitis de Hinchey III, cuando se consideran tanto los riesgos quirúrgicos como la calidad de vida, tanto el lavado laparoscópico como la resección primaria y la anastomosis proporcionan una mayor calidad de años de vida ajustada para los pacientes con diverticulitis de Hinchey III y la resección primaria y anastomosis parece ser el enfoque óptimo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B223.
Collapse
|
14
|
Chino JR, Rayhrer CS, Barrows BD, Salehpour MM. Surgical Management of Giant Colonic Diverticulum Presenting After Laparoscopic Lavage for Diverticular Perforation and Sepsis. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2020; 21:e923457. [PMID: 32719306 PMCID: PMC7414835 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.923457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diverticulosis and its complication of diverticulitis is a common condition that can be found in up to 35% of the population. Giant colonic diverticulum is a rare entity with fewer than 200 cases reported in the scientific literature. Development of a giant diverticulum as a sequelae of laparoscopic washout is an unreported event in current literature. CASE REPORT The patient was a 74-year-old female who had a well-known history of diverticulosis and diverticulitis. She developed perforated sigmoid diverticulitis, underwent laparoscopic washout and recovered without colon resection. Within a year after washout, she developed abdominal distention and bloating, and computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed a giant diverticulum. She went on to undergo surgery for resection of her sigmoid colon, which contained the giant diverticulum. Her recovery was otherwise uneventful. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first case report of giant diverticulum presenting as a complication of abdominal washout for management of acute diverticulitis. Initial CT scan performed at the time of perforation did not demonstrate this diverticulum, indicating that it developed within the year after abdominal washout for sepsis and acute rupture, likely due to weakening of the colonic wall secondary to ongoing inflammation. The very rare presentation of giant diverticulum makes it difficult to establish a clear link to washout, however, this case establishes a groundwork for further investigation as our fund of knowledge on the subject continues to grow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan R Chino
- Department of General Surgery, Community Memorial Health System, Ventura, CA, USA
| | - Constanze S Rayhrer
- Department of General Surgery, Community Memorial Health System, Ventura, CA, USA
| | - Brad D Barrows
- Department of Pathology, Community Memorial Health System, Ventura, CA, USA
| | - Michael M Salehpour
- Department of General Surgery, Community Memorial Health System, Ventura, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sartelli M, Weber DG, Kluger Y, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Abu-Zidan F, Augustin G, Ben-Ishay O, Biffl WL, Bouliaris K, Catena R, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Chiarugi M, Coimbra R, Cortese F, Cui Y, Damaskos D, de’ Angelis GL, Delibegovic S, Demetrashvili Z, De Simone B, Di Marzo F, Di Saverio S, Duane TM, Faro MP, Fraga GP, Gkiokas G, Gomes CA, Hardcastle TC, Hecker A, Karamarkovic A, Kashuk J, Khokha V, Kirkpatrick AW, Kok KYY, Inaba K, Isik A, Labricciosa FM, Latifi R, Leppäniemi A, Litvin A, Mazuski JE, Maier RV, Marwah S, McFarlane M, Moore EE, Moore FA, Negoi I, Pagani L, Rasa K, Rubio-Perez I, Sakakushev B, Sato N, Sganga G, Siquini W, Tarasconi A, Tolonen M, Ulrych J, Zachariah SK, Catena F. 2020 update of the WSES guidelines for the management of acute colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting. World J Emerg Surg 2020; 15:32. [PMID: 32381121 PMCID: PMC7206757 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-020-00313-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute colonic diverticulitis is one of the most common clinical conditions encountered by surgeons in the acute setting. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts from the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) updated its guidelines for management of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis (ALCD) according to the most recent available literature. The update includes recent changes introduced in the management of ALCD. The new update has been further integrated with advances in acute right-sided colonic diverticulitis (ARCD) that is more common than ALCD in select regions of the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dieter G. Weber
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fikri Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Goran Augustin
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Offir Ben-Ishay
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Walter L. Biffl
- Trauma Surgery Department, Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, CA USA
| | | | - Rodolfo Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, ASST, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- General Surgery and Trauma Team, University of Milano, ASST Niguarda Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Moreno Valley, CA USA
| | | | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | | | | | - Samir Delibegovic
- Department of Surgery, University Clinical Center of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Zaza Demetrashvili
- Department General Surgery, Kipshidze Central University Hospital, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Guastalla Hospital, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Mario Paulo Faro
- Department of General Surgery, Trauma and Emergency Surgery Division, ABC Medical School, Santo André, SP Brazil
| | - Gustavo P. Fraga
- Trauma/Acute Care Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - George Gkiokas
- Second Department of Surgery, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Carlos Augusto Gomes
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitário Terezinha de Jesus, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
| | - Timothy C. Hardcastle
- Trauma Service, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital and Department of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Clinical Medicine, Durban, South Africa
| | - Andreas Hecker
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | | | - Jeffry Kashuk
- Department of Surgery, Assia Medical Group, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Vladimir Khokha
- Department of Emergency Surgery, City Hospital, Mozyr, Belarus
| | - Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
- General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Kenneth Y. Y. Kok
- Department of Surgery, The Brunei Cancer Centre, Jerudong Park, Brunei
| | - Kenji Inaba
- Division of Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Arda Isik
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey
| | | | - Rifat Latifi
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY USA
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Abdominal Center, University Hospital Meilahti, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Surgical Disciplines, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University/Regional Clinical Hospital, Kaliningrad, Russian Federation
| | - John E. Mazuski
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University, Saint Louis, USA
| | - Ronald V. Maier
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Sanjay Marwah
- Department of Surgery, Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, India
| | - Michael McFarlane
- Department of Surgery, Radiology, University Hospital of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica
| | - Ernest E. Moore
- Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO USA
| | - Frederick A. Moore
- Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, and Center for Sepsis and Critical Illness Research, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Ionut Negoi
- Department of Surgery, Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Leonardo Pagani
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Bolzano Central Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Kemal Rasa
- Department of Surgery, Anadolu Medical Center, Kocaali, Turkey
| | - Ines Rubio-Perez
- General Surgery Department, Colorectal Surgery Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Norio Sato
- Department of Aeromedical Services for Emergency and Trauma Care, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Walter Siquini
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Antonio Tarasconi
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Matti Tolonen
- Abdominal Center, University Hospital Meilahti, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jan Ulrych
- First Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ryan OK, Ryan ÉJ, Creavin B, Boland MR, Kelly ME, Winter DC. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing primary resection and anastomosis versus Hartmann’s procedure for the management of acute perforated diverticulitis with generalised peritonitis. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:527-543. [DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02172-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
17
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute diverticulitis is a common disease with public health significance. Many studies with a high level of evidence have been published recently on the surgical management of acute diverticulitis. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was to define the accurate surgical management of acute diverticulitis. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were sources used. STUDY SELECTION One reviewer conducted a systematic study with combinations of key words for the disease and the surgical procedure. Additional studies were searched in the reference lists of all included articles. The results of the systematic review were submitted to a working group composed of 13 practitioners. All of the conclusions were obtained by full consensus and validated by an external committee. INTERVENTIONS The interventions assessed were laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, primary resection with anastomosis with or without ileostomy, and the Hartmann procedure, with either a laparoscopic or an open approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Morbidity, mortality, long-term stoma rates, and quality of life were measured. RESULTS Seventy-one articles were included. Five guidelines were retrieved, along with 4 meta-analyses, 14 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials that generated 8 publications, all with a low risk of bias, except for blinding. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage showed concerning results of deep abscesses and unplanned reoperations. Studies on Hinchey III/IV diverticulitis showed similar morbidity and mortality. A reduced length of stay with Hartmann procedure compared with primary resection with anastomosis was reported in the short term, and in the long term, more definite stoma along with poorer quality of life was reported with Hartmann procedure. No high-quality data were found to support the laparoscopic approach. LIMITATIONS Trials specifically assessing Hinchey IV diverticulitis have not yet been completed. CONCLUSIONS High-quality studies showed that laparoscopic peritoneal lavage was associated with an increased morbidity and that Hartmann procedure was associated with poorer long-term outcomes than primary resection with anastomosis with ileostomy, but Hartmann procedure is still acceptable, especially in high-risk patients.
Collapse
|
18
|
Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage versus laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in complicated acute diverticulitis: a multicenter prospective observational study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:2111-2120. [PMID: 31713714 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03429-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) is feasible in selected patients with pelvic abscess and generalized purulent peritonitis caused by acute diverticulitis. We aimed to compare LPL and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) in complicated acute diverticulitis. METHODS This prospective, observational, multicenter study included patients with a pelvic abscess not amenable to conservative management and patients with Hinchey III acute diverticulitis, from 2015 to 2018. Sixty-six patients were enrolled: 28 (42%) underwent LPL and 38 (58%) underwent LS. In LS, patients had a primary anastomosis, with or without ileostomy, or an end colostomy (HA). Major outcomes were mortality, morbidity, failure of source control, reoperation, length of stay, and diverticulitis recurrence. RESULTS Patient demographics were similar in the two groups. In LPL, ASA score > 2 and Mannheim Peritonitis Index were significantly higher (p = 0.05 and 0.004). In LS, 24 patients (63%) had a PA and 14 (37%) an HA. No death was recorded. Overall, morbidity was 33% in LPL and 18% in LS (p = 0.169). However, failure to achieve source control of the peritoneal infection and the need to return to the operating room were more frequent in LPL (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006). Mean postoperative length of stay was comparable (p = 0.08). Diverticular recurrence was significantly higher in LPL (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION LPL is related to a higher reoperation rate, more frequent postoperative ongoing sepsis, and higher recurrence rates. Therefore, laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis carries a high risk of failure in daily practice.
Collapse
|
19
|
Cirocchi R, Nascimbeni R, Binda GA, Vettoretto N, Cuomo R, Gambassi G, Amato A, Annibale B. Surgical treatment of acute complicated diverticulitis in the elderly. MINERVA CHIR 2019; 74:465-471. [PMID: 30306769 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.18.07744-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Although the true prevalence is unknown, colonic diverticulosis is one of the most common disease of the digestive tract in Western countries. Based on administrative data of hospitalized patients, the incidence of diverticulitis has been increasing in last decades. In general, elderly patients undergo less frequently an elective colonic resection; but a substantial part of emergency surgeries is performed in elderly patients. In these older patients the choice of any clinical and surgical option is to be correlated not only to the severity of diverticulitis, but also to general status and the co-existing comorbidities. In this regard, it is mandatory that all patients undergo a multidimensional, comprehensive geriatric assessment to correctly identify those who are fit, vulnerable or frail. The analysis of data currently available highlights three relevant elements: type and severity of peritoneal contamination, hemodynamic conditions (stable or unstable), and concomitant comorbidities (fit or frail status). There is no single ideal surgical treatment that can be considered as gold standard for all clinical presentations; the final clinical decision-making should always be based on patient's general health status, severity of peritonitis and of sepsis. In a septic elderly patient who is hemodynamically unstable, treatment should be as prompt as possible independent of the Hinchey's stage, and could include either a Mickulicz stoma or a DCS strategy. In an elderly patient who is fit and hemodynamically stable, the surgical options are similar to those in a younger patient. If a patient is frail but hemodynamically stable, he should be treated with a Hartmann's procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Surgery and Biochemical Sciences, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy -
| | - Riccardo Nascimbeni
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gian A Binda
- Department of General Surgery, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nereo Vettoretto
- Unit of Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery, M. Mellini Hospital, Chiari, Brescia, Italy
| | - Rosario Cuomo
- Department of Surgery and Biochemical Sciences, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Gambassi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Amato
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of Sanremo, Sanremo, Imperia, Italy
| | - Bruno Annibale
- Department of Medical-Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Is laparoscopic lavage safe in purulent diverticulitis versus colonic resection? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2019; 71:182-189. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
21
|
Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F, Piatti JM, Bun ME, Rotholtz NA. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic sigmoid resection without diversion in perforated diverticulitis. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:1336-1342. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06910-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
22
|
Sneiders D, Lambrichts DPV, Swank HA, Blanken‐Peeters CFJM, Nienhuijs SW, Govaert MJPM, Gerhards MF, Hoofwijk AGM, Bosker RJI, van der Bilt JDW, Heijnen BHM, ten Cate Hoedemaker HO, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Bemelman WA. Long-term follow-up of a multicentre cohort study on laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:705-714. [PMID: 30771246 PMCID: PMC6850083 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage has increasingly been investigated as a promising alternative to sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis. Most studies only reported outcomes up to 12 months. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes of patients treated with laparoscopic lavage. METHODS Between 2008 and 2010, 38 patients treated with laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis in 10 Dutch teaching hospitals were included. Long-term follow-up data on patient outcomes, e.g. diverticulitis recurrence, reoperations and readmissions, were collected retrospectively. The characteristics of patients with recurrent diverticulitis or complications requiring surgery or leading to death, categorized as 'overall complicated outcome', were compared with patients who developed no complications or complications not requiring surgery. RESULTS The median follow-up was 46 months (interquartile range 7-77), during which 17 episodes of recurrent diverticulitis (seven complicated) in 12 patients (32%) occurred. Twelve patients (32%) required additional surgery with a total of 29 procedures. Fifteen patients (39%) had a total of 50 readmissions. Of initially successfully treated patients (n = 31), 12 (31%) had recurrent diverticulitis or other complications. At 90 days, 32 (84%) patients were alive without undergoing a sigmoidectomy. However, seven (22%) of these patients eventually had a sigmoidectomy after 90 days. Diverticulitis-related events occurred up to 6 years after the index procedure. CONCLUSION Long-term diverticulitis recurrence, re-intervention and readmission rates after laparoscopic lavage were high. A complicated outcome was also seen in patients who had initially been treated successfully with laparoscopic lavage with relevant events occurring up to 6 years after initial surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Sneiders
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - D. P. V. Lambrichts
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands,Department of SurgeryAmsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum (AMC)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - H. A. Swank
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum (AMC)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - S. W. Nienhuijs
- Department of SurgeryCatharina HospitalEindhovenThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - A. G. M. Hoofwijk
- Department of SurgeryZuyderland Medical CenterSittard‐GeleenThe Netherlands
| | - R. J. I. Bosker
- Department of SurgeryDeventer HospitalDeventerThe Netherlands
| | | | - B. H. M. Heijnen
- Department of SurgeryLange Land HospitalZoetermeerThe Netherlands
| | | | - G. J. Kleinrensink
- Department of NeuroscienceErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - J. F. Lange
- Department of SurgeryErasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands,Department of SurgeryIJsselland HospitalCapelle aan den IJsselThe Netherlands
| | - W. A. Bemelman
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum (AMC)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The traditional approach for perforated diverticulitis, the Hartmann procedure, has considerable morbidity and the challenge of stoma reversal. Alternative procedures, including primary resection and anastomosis and laparoscopic lavage, have been proposed but remain controversial. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare operative strategies for perforated diverticulitis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the grey literature were searched from inception to October 2017. STUDY SELECTION We included randomized clinical trials evaluating operative strategies for perforated diverticulitis. INTERVENTIONS Hartmann procedure, primary resection and anastomosis, and laparoscopic lavage were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Data were independently extracted by 2 investigators. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Pooled risk ratios for major complications, reoperation, and mortality were determined using random-effects models. RESULTS Six trials including 626 patients with perforated diverticulitis were identified. Laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy had comparable rates of early reoperation and postoperative mortality; major complications (Clavien-Dindo >IIIa) were more frequent after laparoscopic lavage (RR = 1.68 (95% CI, 1.10-2.56); 3 trials, 305 patients). Comparing approaches for sigmoidectomy, primary resection and anastomosis had similar rates of major complications (RR = 0.88 (95% CI, 0.49-1.55); 3 trials, 255 patients) and postoperative mortality (RR = 0.58 (95% CI, 0.20-1.70); 3 trials, 254 patients) compared with the Hartmann procedure. However, patients who underwent primary resection and anastomosis were more likely to be stoma free at 12 months compared with the Hartmann procedure (RR = 1.40 (95% CI, 1.18-1.67); 4 trials, 283 patients) and to experience fewer major complications related to the stoma reversal procedure (RR = 0.26 (95% CI, 0.07-0.89); 4 trials, 186 patients). LIMITATIONS There were no limitations to this study. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic lavage is associated with increased risk of major complications versus primary resection for Hinchey III diverticulitis. The lower rate of stoma reversal and higher rate of complications after the Hartmann procedure suggest primary resection and anastomosis as the optimal management of perforated diverticulitis.
Collapse
|
24
|
Binda GA, Bonino MA, Siri G, Di Saverio S, Rossi G, Nascimbeni R, Sorrentino M, Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Cirocchi R. Multicentre international trial of laparoscopic lavage for Hinchey III acute diverticulitis (LLO Study). Br J Surg 2018; 105:1835-1843. [PMID: 30006923 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2018] [Revised: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic lavage was proposed in the 1990s to treat purulent peritonitis in patients with perforated acute diverticulitis. Prospective randomized trials had mixed results. The aim of this study was to determine the success rate of laparoscopic lavage in sepsis control and to identify a group of patients that could potentially benefit from this treatment. METHODS This retrospective multicentre international study included consecutive patients from 24 centres who underwent laparoscopic lavage from 2005 to 2015. RESULTS A total of 404 patients were included, 231 of whom had Hinchey III acute diverticulitis. Sepsis control was achieved in 172 patients (74·5 per cent), and was associated with lower Mannheim Peritonitis Index score and ASA grade, no evidence of free perforation, absence of extensive adhesiolysis and previous episodes of diverticulitis. The operation was immediately converted to open surgery in 19 patients. Among 212 patients who underwent laparoscopic lavage, the morbidity rate was 33·0 per cent; the reoperation rate was 13·7 per cent and the 30-day mortality rate 1·9 per cent. Twenty-one patients required readmission for early complications, of whom 11 underwent further surgery and one died. Of the 172 patients discharged uneventfully after laparoscopic lavage, a recurrent episode of acute diverticulitis was registered in 46 (26·7 per cent), at a mean of 11 (range 2-108) months. Relapse was associated with younger age, female sex and previous episodes of acute diverticulitis. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic lavage showed a high rate of successful sepsis control in selected patients with perforated Hinchey III acute diverticulitis affected by peritonitis, with low rates of operative mortality, reoperation and stoma formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A Binda
- Department of Surgery, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - M A Bonino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - G Siri
- Scientific Directorate, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - S Di Saverio
- Maggiore Hospital Regional Emergency Surgery and Trauma Centre, Bologna Local Health District, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Bologna, Italy
- Colorectal Surgery and Emergency Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - G Rossi
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - R Nascimbeni
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Sorrentino
- Department of Surgery, Azienda per l'Assistenza Sanitaria n.2 'Bassa Friulana-Isontina', Hospital of Latisana-Palmanova, Latisana, Italy
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - N Vettoretto
- Department of Surgery, Montichiari Hospital, Ospedali civili di Brescia, Montichiari, Italy
| | - R Cirocchi
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Hospital of Terni, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gachabayov M, Oberkofler CE, Tuech JJ, Hahnloser D, Bergamaschi R. Resection with primary anastomosis vs nonrestorative resection for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:753-770. [PMID: 29694694 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM It is still controversial whether the optimal operation for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis is primary anastomosis (PRA) or nonrestorative resection (NRR). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate mortality and morbidity rates following emergency resection for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis and ostomy reversal, as well as ostomy nonreversal rates. METHOD The Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via Ovid, CINAHL and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. Mortality was the primary end-point. A subgroup meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed in addition to a meta-analysis of all eligible studies. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean difference (MD) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. RESULTS Seventeen studies, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving 1016 patients (392 PRA vs 624 NRR) were included. Overall, mortality was significantly lower in patients with PRA compared with patients with NRR [OR (95% CI) = 0.38 (0.24, 0.60), P < 0.0001]. Organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) [OR (95% CI) = 0.25 (0.10, 0.63), P = 0.003], reoperation [OR (95% CI) = 0.48 (0.25, 0.91), P = 0.02] and ostomy nonreversal rates [OR (95% CI) = 0.27 (0.09, 0.84), P = 0.02] were significantly decreased in PRA. In the RCTs, the mortality rate did not differ [OR (95% CI) = 0.46 (0.15, 1.38), P = 0.17]. The mean operating time for PRA was significantly longer than for NRR [MD (95% CI) = 19.96 (7.40, 32.52), P = 0.002]. Organ/space SSI [OR (95% CI) = 0.28 (0.09, 0.82), P = 0.02] was lower after PRA. Ostomy nonreversal rates were lower after PRA. The difference was not statistically significant [OR (95% CI) = 0.26 (0.06, 1.11), P = 0.07]. However, it was clinically significant [number needed to treat/harm (95% CI) = 5 (3.1, 8.9)]. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis found that organ/space SSI rates as well as ostomy nonreversal rates were decreased in PRA at the cost of prolonging the operating time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Gachabayov
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - C E Oberkofler
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J J Tuech
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - D Hahnloser
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - R Bergamaschi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Acute diverticulitis is a common condition that has been increasing in incidence in the United States. It is associated with increasing age, but the pathophysiology of acute diverticulitis is still being elucidated. It is now believed to have a significant contribution from inflammatory processes rather than being a strictly infectious process. There are still many questions to be answered regarding the optimal management of acute diverticulitis because recent studies have challenged traditional practices, such as the routine use of antibiotics, surgical technique, and dietary restrictions for prevention of recurrence.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ceresoli M, Lo Bianco G, Gianotti L, Nespoli L. Inflammation management in acute diverticulitis: current perspectives. J Inflamm Res 2018; 11:239-246. [PMID: 29881303 PMCID: PMC5985778 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s142990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The pathogenesis of diverticular disease and acute diverticulitis is still unclear and many different hypotheses have been formulated. Seemingly, there are several related factors such as chronic inflammation, gut microbiome, obesity and the immunogenic properties of fat tissue and diet. Inflammation plays a pivotal role in diverticular disease and acute diverticulitis. The aim of the present review is to investigate the role of inflammation in diverticular disease as well as in mild and complicated acute diverticulitis with a focus on current research and treatment perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Ceresoli
- Department of General Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.,School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Lo Bianco
- Department of General Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.,School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Gianotti
- Department of General Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.,School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Nespoli
- Department of General Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.,School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kohl A, Rosenberg J, Bock D, Bisgaard T, Skullman S, Thornell A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Haglind E. Two-year results of the randomized clinical trial DILALA comparing laparoscopic lavage with resection as treatment for perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2018; 105:1128-1134. [PMID: 29663316 PMCID: PMC6055876 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Revised: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Background Traditionally, perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis was treated with resection and colostomy (Hartmann's procedure), with inherent complications and risk of a permanent stoma. The DILALA (DIverticulitis – LAparoscopic LAvage versus resection (Hartmann's procedure) for acute diverticulitis with peritonitis) and other randomized trials found laparoscopic lavage to be a feasible and safe alternative. The medium‐term follow‐up results of DILALA are reported here. Methods Patients were randomized during surgery after being diagnosed with Hinchey grade III perforated diverticulitis at diagnostic laparoscopy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with one or more secondary operations from 0 to 24 months after the index procedure in the laparoscopic lavage versus Hartmann's procedure groups. The trial was registered as ISRCTN82208287. Results Forty‐three patients were randomized to laparoscopic lavage and 40 to Hartmann's procedure. Patients in the lavage group had a 45 per cent reduced risk of undergoing one or more operations within 24 months (relative risk 0·55, 95 per cent c.i. 0·36 to 0·84; P = 0·012) and had fewer operations (ratio 0·51, 95 per cent c.i. 0·31 to 0·87; P = 0·024) compared with those in the Hartmann's group. No difference was found in mean number of readmissions (1·37 versus 1·50; P = 0·221) or mortality between patients randomized to laparoscopic lavage or Hartmann's procedure. Three patients in the lavage group and nine in the Hartmann's group had a colostomy at 24 months. Conclusion Laparoscopic lavage is a better option for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis than open resection and colostomy. Laparoscopic lavage still an option
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kohl
- Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J Rosenberg
- Centre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - D Bock
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - T Bisgaard
- GastroUnit, Surgical Division, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - S Skullman
- Department of Surgery, Skövde Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
| | - A Thornell
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - J Gehrman
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Haglind
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lambrichts DPV, Birindelli A, Tonini V, Cirocchi R, Cervellera M, Lange JF, Bemelman WA, Di Saverio S. The Multidisciplinary Management of Acute Complicated Diverticulitis. Inflamm Intest Dis 2018; 3:80-90. [PMID: 30733952 DOI: 10.1159/000486677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute complicated diverticulitis (ACD) is an important and increasing issue in Western countries that leads to a significant impact and burden for patients, but also for the society due to its effects on hospital costs. In recent years, essential progression has been made regarding the research and implementation of novel or improved treatment strategies for the various disease entities of ACD. Much debated topics in the multidisciplinary approach of patients with ACD, such as the choice for nonoperative treatment options, the role of percutaneous drainage for diverticular abscesses, the role of laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis, and the role of sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for patients with perforated diverticulitis, require clinicians to attentively follow and participate in these discussions. SUMMARY The aim of this review article is to provide clinicians with a structured overview of the recent literature on the multidisciplinary management of complicated diverticulitis by a panel of experts on the topic. By performing an extensive literature search in the online medical databases MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase, insights into nonoperative treatment, percutaneous drainage, minimally invasive and open surgical treatment of ACD are provided. Furthermore, a comprehensive algorithm for the treatment of ACD has been developed. KEY MESSAGES Accurate patient evaluation and selection based on patient and disease characteristics is of paramount importance to determine the appropriate treatment strategy for patients with complicated diverticulitis. The presence of an experienced surgeon with advanced skills in laparoscopic emergency colorectal surgery is crucial for the treatment of patients with perforated diverticulitis in order to properly evaluate, select and treat patients suitable for nonoperative or operative treatment with an open or laparoscopic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniël P V Lambrichts
- Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arianna Birindelli
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Emergency Surgery Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.,Queen Elizabeth University Hospital NHS, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Valeria Tonini
- Emergency Surgery Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Cervellera
- Emergency Surgery Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Johan F Lange
- Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Department of Surgery, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.,Havenziekenhuis, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|