Efficacy and safety of intraarticular hyaluronic acid and corticosteroid for knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis

Current Practices and Perceived Effectiveness of Clinicians Regarding Polynucleotide Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Survey-Based Evaluation

Aims: Intra-articular (IA) injection therapy, particularly IA hyaluronic acid (HA), is a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but it does have limitations. The injection of IA polynucleotide (PN) has emerged as an alternative, potentially offering superior clinical outcomes. This study investigates current practice patterns and the perceived effectiveness of PN among clinicians for treating knee osteoarthritis in the Republic of Korea. Methods: Based on a survey conducted among clinicians who use PN in clinical practice, we explored the current practices and assessed the perceived effectiveness of IA PN in treating knee osteoarthritis. Results: A total of 265 clinicians who used IA PN for knee osteoarthritis participated in the survey. Most clinicians (73.3%) used PN therapy for the treatment of chronic pain, with varying administration frequencies. In addition, 25.8% of clinicians used PN for the treatment of acute flare-ups. In cases of knee effusion, 55.5% of clinicians removed the effusion prior to administering PN. Clinicians rated PN as more effective than HA for both chronic pain and acute flare-ups, with higher scores for cushioning, anti-inflammatory effects, and delaying joint degeneration. The clinicians stated that patients expressed a higher satisfaction with IA PN compared with IA HA, noting improvement in joint smoothness, noise reduction, pain relief, and a reduction in heat sensation and swelling. Conclusions: The results of the present study highlight the extensive use and perceived benefits among clinicians of IA PN for knee osteoarthritis in the Republic of Korea. Further research is warranted to explore the effectiveness of PN in acute flare-ups and to validate these findings in broader populations.

Nanomaterials: Recent Advances in Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is the most prevalent degenerative joint condition that places a substantial financial and medical burden on society. However, due to drawbacks such as inefficiency, adverse effects, and brief duration of action, the clinical efficacy of the current major therapies for knee OA is largely restricted. Therefore, novel medication development is highly required to address these issues. Numerous studies in recent years have established that nanomaterials can be a potential and highly effective way to overcome these challenges. In this review, the anatomical distinctions between healthy and OA knee joints, as well as novel advances in the field of nanomaterials for the treatment of knee OA are summarized. The limits of the present therapeutic strategies for treating knee OA are also highlighted, as well as the potential prospects of nanomaterials in the future.

Maximizing Knee OA Treatment: A Comparative Look at Physiotherapy and Injections

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and disabling condition often managed with physiotherapy or intra-articular injections. However, the comparative effectiveness of these treatments remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of physiotherapy and intra-articular injections in managing knee OA.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, and Cochrane Library was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing physiotherapy and intra-articular injections in knee OA patients were included. Key outcomes included pain (VAS), function (WOMAC, KOOS), range of motion (ROM), and quality of life. Data from five studies with a total of 552 participants were analyzed.

RESULTS

Intra-articular injections, particularly botulinum toxin and hyaluronic acid, were found to provide rapid pain relief, outperforming physiotherapy in short-term pain management. However, physiotherapy contributed significantly to long-term functional improvements, particularly in early-stage OA. Combination therapy of injections and physiotherapy yielded the best short-term pain relief and functional outcomes. Heterogeneity in study designs and follow-up periods limited the generalizability of findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular injections are effective for immediate pain control, while physiotherapy plays a crucial role in maintaining joint function, especially for long-term management. Combining both interventions may offer the most comprehensive benefits. Further research is needed to determine the long-term efficacy of these treatments.

Beyond Boundaries of a Trial: Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up of SOYA Patients

Background/Objectives: osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability. With an aging population and rising obesity rates, OA presents a growing challenge to health systems worldwide. Current OA treatments involve a mix of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid (HA) has proven effective, especially in knee OA, leading to its recommendation in international guidelines. This study investigates the sustained benefits of a single intra-articular HA injection beyond one year in patients coming from the SOYA trial, considering the EU MDR 2017/745 emphasis on post-market follow-up. Methods: A prospective, observational, open, post-marketing study in a cohort of patients that participated in the SOYA trial. Follow-up was carried out by means of a telephone survey, and the data were anonymized and coded so that patients could not be identified. The study was approved by the Alcorcón Hospital Institutional Review Board (Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain). Results: In the follow-up of the SOYA trial, 81.5% of patients sustained positive effects for over 6 months after the trial ended. This correlated with improved daily functioning, enhanced mood, and high patient satisfaction. Younger age and milder OA grades were associated with prolonged treatment effects. Notably, 82% of patients with >6 months of improvement did not require additional medication. Conclusions: the results of this study support the safety and performance of Adant® Plus as a treatment for patients with mild and moderate knee OA, with results lasting more than one year. Post-marketing studies are particularly relevant to examine the experience gained with the use of the device in routine clinical practice.

Complications of Stem Cell-Based Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) remains a common cause of knee pain and dysfunction. Stem cell-based injections have been widely used for the treatment of knee OA, but the types and rates of post-injection complications are not well characterized. We sought to characterize the type and severity of adverse events and quantify the frequency of adverse events associated with stem cell injections used to treat knee OA. We conducted a systematic review that followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the PubMed and the Cochrane library databases for studies on adverse events and complications associated with stem cell-based therapies used to treat knee OA published from January 2000 through June 2021. Inclusion criteria were the use of intra-articular autologous bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) or bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) including microfragmented lipoaspirate, concentrated adipose tissue, cultured stem cells, autologous stromal vascular fraction (SVF), or umbilical or placental derived stem cells in human participants. Primary data extracted from included studies were patient demographics, methods of treatment, and reported character, duration, and severity of adverse events. A total of 427 studies were screened, and 48 studies were included, including randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, and retrospective studies. Among the 1924 patients in the analysis, there was an overall 12.3% rate of transient adverse events, the most frequent being swelling and pain at the injection site. Umbilical cord-derived (51.7%) and cultured ADMSC (29.5%) injections had a significantly higher occurrence of these adverse events than BMSC and SVF injections. No other adverse events, including infection, fat embolism, or medical complications, were reported. Despite significant heterogeneity of the included studies in terms of the protocol, formulation, timing, and location of injections, the findings of this systematic review suggest that, in the short term, treatment of knee OA with autologous mesenchymal stem cell injections poses no risk of major complications (infection, sepsis, neoplasm, embolism, or death) and poses moderate risk of swelling and pain at the injection site lasting less than 4 weeks. Further long-term studies are needed to conclusively determine the safety profile of these injections.

Efficacy Analysis of Arthroscopic Surgery Combined with Intra-articular Chitosan Injection for Stage II-III Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients with Abnormal Body Weight

OBJECTIVE

Weight is an influential factor in knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, the effect of abnormal body weight on chitosan's efficacy in treating KOA is unclear. This study aimed to explore the differences in the effectiveness of arthroscopic surgery combined with intra-articular chitosan injection for KOA in patients with abnormal body weight.

METHODS

Patients with stage II-III KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence rating, K-L) undergoing arthroscopic surgery were recruited for this clinical study from January 2020 to September 2021. Based on body mass index (BMI) and intra-articular chitosan injection, patients with KOA undergoing arthroscopic surgery (138 patients) were divided into four groups: low-weight-non-injection (Lw-N, BMI <18.5); low-weight-chitosan injection (Lw-CS, BMI <18.5); overweight-non-injection (Ow-N, BMI ≥25); overweight-chitosan injection (Ow-CS, BMI ≥25). A 2-year follow-up was conducted to evaluate various indicators, including the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index score (WOMAC). Statistical analyses were performed using relevant parametric or non-parametric tests.

RESULTS

In total, 138 patients with KOA were included in this study. There were no significant differences in gender, age, and incidence of chronic residual pain after arthroscopy among the four groups (p > 0.05). The proportion of patients undergoing subsequent knee arthroplasty during the 2-year follow-up period was significantly higher in the Ow-CS group (20/35) than in the Lw-CS group (12/39) (p < 0.05). The K-L rating showed an overall increasing trend over time, with the K-L rating in the Ow-N and Ow-CS groups significantly higher than that in the Lw-CS group at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). VAS and WOMAC scores significantly decreased at 1 and 3 months post-arthroscopy and then increased. One month after arthroscopy, VAS was significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the intra-articular chitosan injection groups (Lw-CS and Ow-CS) compared with the non-injection groups (Lw-N and Ow-N). VAS was lower in the Ow-CS group than in the Lw-CS group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in WOMAC between the intra-articular chitosan injection and non-injection groups at each time point (Lw-N vs. Lw-CS, Ow-N vs. Ow-CS, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic surgery combined with intra-articular chitosan injection shows short-term positive effects in treating KOA. Intra-articular chitosan injection appears to have a greater short-term pain relief effect in obese patients.

Epidemiology and treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee in Germany: A retrospective health claims data analysis

Objective

Osteoarthritis of the knee (knee OA) is a serious joint disease leading to pain and reduced quality of life. Pharmacological treatments include anti-inflammatories, analgesics, intraarticular hyaluronic acid, and intraarticular corticosteroids while for severe knee OA, knee replacement is an option. This study examined the incidence, prevalence, patient characteristics, and uptake of medical and surgical treatments in knee OA patients in Germany.

Design

A non-interventional, retrospective health claims data analysis with anonymized data from the InGef database was performed. Patients ≥18 years were analyzed cross-sectionally for each year 2015-2020. Newly diagnosed patients in 2015 were also longitudinally analyzed until end of 2020.

Results

Annual knee OA prevalence increased from 7.07 ​% in 2015 to 7.39 ​% in 2020. Annual incidence proportions ranged from 1.71 ​% in 2015 to 1.46 ​% in 2020. Knee replacement was the most common surgery, with rising patient numbers (e.g., 7918 patients in 2015 and 8975 patients in 2019). Approximately 62 ​% of patients newly diagnosed in 2015 received prescription pharmacological pain treatment during follow-up. Most (96.95 ​%) received non-opioid analgesics, followed by weak opioids (8.14 ​%) and strong opioids (3.00 ​%) as first-line treatment (combinations possible). Knee surgery was performed in 16.6 ​% of patients during follow-up. Median time from first diagnosis until surgery was 346 days for any knee surgery and 564 days for knee replacement.

Conclusions

The number of patients with knee OA in Germany is steadily rising, along with an increasing number of surgical interventions, especially knee replacement. Time until first surgery and knee replacement is relatively short, even for newly diagnosed patients.

The role and impact of health economics in the optimization of patient care in osteoarthritis: insights from a practical example

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease with a substantial global burden, causing chronic pain and reduced quality of life. Managing OA efficiently while maximizing healthcare resources is crucial. Health economics and health technology assessment (HTA) are central tools providing a framework to evaluate the clinical, economic, and ethical aspects of healthcare technologies and interventions. This article presents some insights into the role of health economics and the HTA process in OA management. It also illustrates an example of cost-effectiveness analysis in a specific healthcare context, on the basis of a recent clinical trial involving hyaluronic acid treatment for knee OA. While HTA offers valuable insights, it faces challenges like data availability and resource constraints. Integrating health economics into decision-making can enhance patient care and allocate resources effectively in OA and other healthcare domains.

Efficacy of ozone injections for reducing musculoskeletal pain in comparison with corticosteroid injections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid injections are frequently used in the short-term treatment of musculoskeletal pain, but their use is controversial as repeated exposures to corticosteroids can lead to deleterious effects on musculoskeletal tissue. Ozone injections have been proposed as a possible treatment for musculoskeletal pain; however, their effectiveness has not been compared with corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of ozone injections for reducing pain in individuals with musculoskeletal pain in comparison with corticosteroid injections through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

An online systematic search was performed using electronic databases up to September 2023. We searched for studies that compared corticosteroid injections with ozone injections in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain of diverse origins.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included comprising a total of 534 individuals. In the overall pooled analysis, a pain reduction in favor of corticosteroid injections was found in the short term (d= 0.31, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.60, p (z) 0.04, I2 = 32%). In the medium term, no significant differences were found in reducing pain between groups (d=-0.17, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.07, p (z) 0.15, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that corticosteroids injections are more effective in reducing musculoskeletal pain in the short term, but equally effective in the medium term when compared with ozone injections. Nonetheless, better-quality clinical trials are necessary to corroborate these results.

The Effect of Aspiration and Corticosteroid Injection After ACL Injury on Postoperative Infection Rate

BACKGROUND

Injecting bioactive substances into the knee is common in orthopaedic practice, and recently it has been shown to mitigate risk factors for posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Therefore, understanding the influence of these injections on postoperative infection rate is imperative.

HYPOTHESIS

Postinjury aspiration and corticosteroid injection (CSI) of the knee before anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) would not increase the risk of postoperative infection.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort Study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

All patients between the ages of 10 and 65 years who underwent primary bone-patellar tendon-bone ACLR by 1 fellowship-trained sports medicine orthopaedic surgeon between January 1, 2011, and September 8, 2020, at 1 of 2 major academic centers were evaluated for inclusion. A total of 693 patients were included, with 273 patients receiving postinjury and preoperative aspiration and CSI. A postoperative infection was defined as a patient returning to the operating room for an intra-articular washout. The intervals-measured in days-between the CSI and ACLR and between ACLR and the final follow-up were recorded. To further evaluate the infection risk in each cohort (total cohort; aspiration and injection cohort; no aspiration and injection cohort), the upper 95% confidence bound for the infection risk was calculated for each cohort.

RESULTS

There were no postoperative infections in the 693 patients included in this study. The upper 95% confidence bounds were 0.4%, 1.1%, and 0.7% for the total cohort, the cohort that underwent aspiration and injection, and the cohort that did not, respectively. The median number of days between the surgical date and that of the aspiration and injection was 34 days, and the mean follow-up for the entire cohort was 337.4 days (95% CI, 307.6-367.3).

CONCLUSION

Postinjury and preoperative aspiration and CSI is a safe intervention that can be used before ACLR. Future studies with larger sample sizes, longer patient follow-ups, and multiple surgeons would be helpful to both better understand infection risk and better identify the influence of CSI on preventing posttraumatic osteoarthritis.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Intra-articular Infiltration of Hyaluronic Acid and Corticosteroids in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Comparative Study

Background Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic and progressive disease of the knee joint characterized by articular cartilage destruction. It is the most common cause of knee disability and pain globally. Various treatments are used for the management of KOA; however, the role of intra-articular injections in KOA management in Pakistan remains understudied. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) and corticosteroids in the management of KOA. Methodology This randomized, prospective, comparative study was conducted among 88 patients diagnosed with KOA in the outpatient department clinic of orthopedics in Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, from January 2022 to January 2023. For patient enrolment, structured inclusion and exclusion criteria and a simple random sampling technique were used. Before data collection, ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Data collection was done via a self-structured and interview-based proforma. Data analysis was performed through descriptive statistics and independent t-tests using SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results KOA was more prevalent in women (60, 68.18%) than men (28, 31.82%). The means for study variables such as age, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score were 58.08 ± 7.89 years, 7.66 ± 1.8, and 71.86 ± 8.90, respectively. The incidences of right-sided and left-sided KOA were 57 (64.77%) and 31 (35.23%), respectively. Likewise, the frequency of grade II KOA was 55 (62.50%), while the frequency of grade III KOA was 33 (37.50%). Differences in the mean scores of both VAS and WOMAC between study groups were statistically significant at the second-week, sixth-week, and third-month follow-up visits. However, the mean scores of VAS and WOMAC were lower in group B than in group A at the second-week follow-up visit, whereas the scores were lower in group A compared to group B after the sixth week and third month of intra-articular injections. Conclusions Intra-articular injections of both HA and corticosteroids were adequately effective in the management of KOA-associated pain and functional restrictions; nevertheless, the benefits of corticosteroids were acute and short-term, whereas the outcomes of HA were gradual and long-term.

Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and PRP and combination therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

There are many injectable treatments for knee osteoarthritis with different characteristics and effects, the aim is to understand which one can lead to better and safer results.

METHODS

The PRISMA principles were followed when doing the literature search. Web of Science databases, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and the Wanfang database were searched to identified randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of corticosteroids (CSC), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), and combination therapy in treating KOA. Risk of bias was assessed using the relevant Cochrane tools (version 1.0). The outcome measure included the visual analog scale (VAS) score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score, and treatment-related adverse events. The network meta-analysis was performed using STATA17 software and a Bayesian stratified random effects model.

RESULTS

Network meta-analysis using the Bayesian random-effects model revealed 35 studies with 3104 participants. PRP showed the best WOMAC score at a 3-month follow-up, followed by PRP + HA, HA, placebo, and CSC; PRP + HA scored the highest VAS, followed by PRP, CSC, HA, and placebo. PRP, CSC, HA, and placebo had the highest WOMAC scores six months following treatment; PRP + HA showed the best VAS scores. PRP showed the best WOMAC score at 12 months, followed by PRP + HA, HA, placebo, and CSC; The best VAS score was obtained with PRP, followed by PRP + HA, HA, and CSC. No therapy demonstrated a rise in adverse events linked to the treatment in terms of safety.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found that PRP and PRP + HA were the most successful in improving function and alleviating pain after 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. CSC, HA, PRP, and combination therapy did not result in an increase in the incidence of treatment-related side events as compared to placebo.

Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation after Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Elderly with Knee, Hip, Shoulder, and Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint condition characterized by cartilage deterioration, joint inflammation, and functional limitations, particularly impacting the elderly population. Rehabilitation and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are common therapeutic approaches routinely used in clinical practice, but their synergistic potential is far from being fully characterized. Thus, the aim of this narrative review was to elucidate the multilevel benefits and synergies of integrating these two approaches in multidisciplinary OA rehabilitation. This narrative review follows the scale for the assessment of narrative review articles (SANRA) criteria and involves a comprehensive literature search from July to August 2023. Two independent reviewers screened studies, including those involving human subjects with OA, rehabilitation strategies, and outcomes following HA injection, published in English. Results: HA injections might improve joint biomechanics, reducing friction, absorbing shocks, and potentially regulating inflammation. Rehabilitation plays a pivotal role in strengthening muscles, increasing the range of motion, and enhancing overall function. Optimizing rehabilitation following HA injection might provide additional benefits in joint health. OA management requires a multidisciplinary approach integrating HA injections, rehabilitation, and personalized care. Challenges in patient adherence and healthcare resources currently exist, but emerging technologies offer opportunities to enhance patient engagement and monitoring optimizing sustainability and outcomes of patients with knee, hip, shoulder, and temporomandibular joint OA.

Intra-articular autologous conditioned serum and triamcinolone injections in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a controlled, randomized, double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to assess the impact of autologous conditioned serum (ACS) when added to preceding intra-articular glucocorticoid therapy on pain, function, and quality of life outcomes over 24 weeks.

METHODS

In this single-center, randomized controlled trial involving 40 patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades III and IV), ACS or saline placebo was injected after 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide (TA) intra-articular injection. Numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) assessments were conducted at baseline and at weeks 3, 6, 12, and 24. The primary endpoint was the change in KOOS Pain at 24 weeks. Patient safety events were also monitored.

RESULTS

At week 24, TA + ACS significantly improved KOOS Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Quality of Life, and KOOS Sport scores. TA + ACS also outperformed TA + placebo in NRS pain scores (average and maximum intensity) at week 24 and NRS pain score (at rest) at weeks 12 and 24. The TA injection followed by ACS or placebo was well-tolerated.

CONCLUSION

ACS adds long-term pain relief and functional improvement to the short-term pain relief provided by glucocorticoids.

Italian Orthopaedic and Traumatology Society (SIOT) position statement on the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease associated with a severe impact on quality of life. However, unfortunately, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the non-surgical management of this disease. While recognising the gap between scientific evidence and clinical practice, this position statement aims to present recommendations for the non-surgical management of knee OA, considering the available evidence and the clinical knowledge of experienced surgeons. The overall goal is to offer an evidenced-based expert opinion, aiding clinicians in the management of knee OA while considering the condition, values, needs and preferences of individual patients.

METHODS

The study design for this position statement involved a preliminary search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline and Cochrane databases for literature spanning the period between January 2021 and April 2023, followed by screening of relevant articles (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). A Società Italiana Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SIOT) multidisciplinary task force (composed of four orthopaedic surgeons and a rheumatologist) subsequently formulated the recommendations.

RESULTS

Evidence-based recommendations for the non-surgical management of knee OA were developed, covering assessment, general approach, patient information and education, lifestyle changes and physical therapy, walking aids, balneotherapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, pharmacological interventions and injections.

CONCLUSIONS

For non-surgical management of knee OA, the recommended first step is to bring about lifestyle changes, particularly management of body weight combined with physical exercise and/or hydrotherapy. For acute symptoms, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), topic or oral, can be used. Opioids can only be used as third-line pharmacological treatment. Glucosamine and chondroitin are also suggested as chronic pharmacological treatment. Regarding intra-articular infiltrative therapy, the use of hyaluronic acid is recommended in cases of chronic knee OA [platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as second line), in the absence of active acute disease, while the use of intra-articular injections of cortisone is effective and preferred for severe acute symptoms.

Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

In recent years, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for osteoarthritis (OA) have been widely promoted in clinical practice, but their effectiveness is controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the efficacy and safety of PRP injections for the treatment of OA.

Methods

We searched databases including Embase, Web of Science, Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies. Two researchers (YQX and CG) performed literature screening, baseline data extraction, literature quality assessment, and heterogeneity analysis of RCTs from the retrieved studies. Based on the magnitude of heterogeneity I², random-effects or fixed-effects models were selected for the meta-analysis.

Results

We included 24 RCTs comprising 1344 patients with OA who met the inclusion criteria, with the main types of morbidity being knee osteoarthritis (KOA), hip osteoarthritis (HOA), ankle osteoarthritis (AOA), and temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA). Our results indicate that PRP injections were effective in improving Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores in patients with KOA, HOA, and AOA compared to controls (AOA, MD = -1.15, CI = 95% [-1.74, -0.56], I² = 40%, P < 0.05; KOA, MD = -1.03, CI = 95% [-1.16, -0.9], I² = 87%, P < 0.05; TMJOA, MD = -1.35, CI = 95% [-1.74, -0.97], I² = 92%, P < 0.05) but showed no significant efficacy in patients with HOA (MD = -0.27, CI = 95% [-0.8, 0.26], I² = 56%, P>0.05). Compared to controls, PRP injections were effective in improving Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), including the patient's pain symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL), and adhesion symptomatology, but not for that of sports function (KOOS-pain, MD = 2.77, CI = 95% [0, 5.53], I² = 0%, P < 0.05; KOOS-symptoms, MD = 3.73, CI = 95% [0.76, 6.71], I² = 0%, P < 0.05; KOOS-ADL, MD = 3.61, CI = 95% [0.79, 6.43], I² = 0%, P < 0.05; KOOS-QOL, MD = 4.66, CI = 95% [0.98, 8.35], I² = 29%, P < 0.05, KOOS-sport, MD = 0.48, CI = 95% [-3.02, 3.98], I² = 0%, P > 0.05). PRP injections were effective in improving Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, including pain, stiffness, and functional joint motion, in patients with OA compared with the control group (WOMAC-pain, MD = -1.08, CI = 95% [-1.62, -0.53], I² = 87%, P < 0.05; WOMAC-stiffness, MD = -1.17, CI = 88% [-1.72, -0.63], I² = 87%, P < 0.05; WOMAC-function, MD = -1.12, CI = 95% [-1.65, -0.58], I² = 87%, P < 0.05). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that leukocyte-poor (LP) PRP injections were more effective than leukocyte-rich (LR) PRP injections in improving pain symptoms in patients with OA (VAS, LR-PRP, MD = -0.81, CI = 95% [-1.65, -0.03], I² = 83%, P = 0.06 > 0.05; LP-PRP, MD = -1.62, CI = 95% [-2.36, -0.88], I² = 92%, P < 0.05). A subgroup analysis based on injection sites showed that no statistical difference in efficacy between intra-articular (IA) combined with intra-osseous (IO) simultaneous PRP injections. IA PRP injections only improved VAS pain scores in patients with OA (IA+IO PRP injections, MD = -0.74, CI =95% [-1.29, -0.18], I² = 61%, P < 0.05; IA PRP injections, MD = -1.43, CI = 95% [-2.18, -0.68], I² = 87%, P < 0.05, test for subgroup differences, P > 0.05, I² = 52.7%).

Conclusion

PRP injection therapy can safely and effectively improve functional activity in patients with OA and produce positive analgesic effects in patients with KOA, TMJOA, and AOA. However, PRP injection therapy did not significantly reduce pain symptoms in patients with HOA. In addition, the analgesic effect of LP-PRP was greater than that of LR-PRP.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022362066.

Three Weekly Intra-Articular Injections of Hylan G-F 20 vs Arthrocentesis in Patients with Chronic Idiopathic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter, Evaluator- and Patient-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Knee osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Symptoms can vary over time, leading to episodes of worsened symptoms known as flares. Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid has demonstrated long-term symptomatic relief in the broader knee osteoarthritis population, although its use in the flare population has not been extensively examined.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of 3 once-weekly intra-articular injections of hylan G-F 20 (as single and repeat courses) in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis, including a subpopulation that experienced flare.

Methods

Prospective randomized controlled, evaluator- and patient-blinded, multicenter trial with 2 phases: hylan G-F 20 vs arthrocentesis only (control) and 2 courses vs single-course hylan G-F 20. Primary outcomes were visual analog scale (0-100 mm) pain scores. Secondary outcomes included safety and synovial fluid analysis.

Results

Ninety-four patients (104 knees) were enrolled in Phase I, with 31 knees representing flare patients. Seventy-six patients (82 knees) were enrolled in Phase II. Long-term follow-up was 26 to 34 weeks. In flare patients, hylan G-F 20 showed significantly more improvement than the controls for all primary outcomes except pain at night (P = 0.063). Both 1 and 2 courses of hylan G-F 20 showed significant improvements from baseline for primary outcomes with no differences in efficacy between groups in the intention-to-treat population at the end of Phase II. Two courses of hylan G-F 20 showed better improvement in pain with motion (P = 0.0471) at long-term follow-up. No general side effects were reported, and local reactions (pain/swelling of the injected joint) resolved within 1 to 2 weeks. Hylan G-F 20 was also associated with reduced effusion volume and protein concentration.

Conclusions

Hylan G-F 20 significantly improves pain scores vs arthrocentesis in flare patients with no safety concerns. A repeat course of hylan G-F 20 was found to be well tolerated and efficacious.

A Randomized Trial of Intra-articular Injection Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular injections are widely used for conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, rigorous data are lacking regarding the comparative therapeutic effectiveness of these injections.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after intra-articular injections of glucocorticoid, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or placebo in patients with mild or moderate OA of the knee.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single-center trial, we randomly assigned knees with early- to middle-stage knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-3) to an intra-articular injection with one of these substances: glucocorticoid, hyaluronic acid, PRP, or placebo. Primary outcome was pain reduction within 6 months after the injection, assessed with the numeric rating scale (NRS; range, 0-100). Secondary outcome parameters included WOMAC scores, Tegner Activity Scale, knee mobility, and adverse events. Finally, a linear mixed-effects model was calculated and corrected for possible patient and covariate effects.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty knees (30 knees per treatment group) in 95 patients (41 female) were included in the final analysis. The median age of patients was 60 years (interquartile range, 54.0-68.0). There was no evidence that the drug effects of primary and secondary outcome parameters differed over time. The median pain at baseline was 32.5 (interquartile range, 15.00-50.00) on NRS. The changes in pain level during the first 6 months compared with baseline were small (within ±5 points on NRS), whereas the intrapatient variability was large between -20 and +20 points. Secondary outcome parameters did not differ significantly among the groups. Kellgren-Lawrence grade did not have a statistically significant effect on pain reduction ( P = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that knee injections with glucocorticoid, PRP, or hyaluronic acid have superior short- or long-term effects in patients with low pain level at baseline and early- to middle-stage knee OA when compared with placebo.

Funding has no effect on studies evaluating viscosupplementation for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest

Background

Viscosupplementation for knee osteoarthritis (OA) may raise concerns regarding conflicts of interest (COI). Evidence of inconclusive study results and publication bias in previous studies has led to concern that financial COI have influenced viscosupplementation outcomes. It is critical to ensure that clinical practice is guided by informed decision making and evidence-based medicine.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles pertaining to hyaluronic acid (or similarly derived) injections to native knees with primary OA only. Bibliometric data, financial COI, and study outcomes were assessed.

Results

67 studies met inclusion criteria for analysis, 53 of which (79.1%) presented Level I evidence, and 21 of which (31.3%) reported at least one author with COI. All studies reporting COI also disclosed industry funding. There were no relationships between reported COI and study outcomes (Χ 2  = 0.31, P = 0.577), levels of evidence (Χ 2  = 3.48, P = 0.176), or relative citation ratio (RCR) (S = 743, P = 0.591). Studies reporting COIs/industry funding tended to be published in journals with significantly higher impact factors (IF) (reporting COI: IF = 3.5 ± 2.0; no COI: IF = 1.8 ± 1.1; S = 950, P < 0.001). Study outcomes were not related to the probability of being published in an open access journal (Χ 2  = 0.01, P = 0.960), nor to level of evidence (Χ 2  = 2.67, P = 0.263), RCR (S = 618, P = 0.835), or IF (S = 563, P = 0.655).

Conclusions

Investigator COIs (and commercial funding of studies) have not significantly influenced the frequency of favorable outcomes or study level of evidence regarding contemporary viscosupplementation for the treatment of knee OA. Studies reporting COIs/industry funding tended to be published in journals with significantly higher impact factors. Results overwhelmingly supported using viscosupplementation to treat knee OA.

Level of evidence

Level V Systematic Review.

Patient Reported Outcomes Following Intraarticular Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Intraarticular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) has been commonly used in the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study sought to assess patient reported outcomes (PRO) following different formulations of HA injections for patients who have knee OA.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who have knee OA and received IAHA knee injections from October 2018 to May 2022 in sports medicine (SM) and adult reconstructive (AR) clinics. Patients completed PRO measures including the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS ®) Mobility, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity at baseline, 6-week, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate changes in PRO measures between baseline and follow-up periods and to evaluate differences between the SM and AR divisions. A total of 995 patients received IAHA for knee OA and completed PRO assessments.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the PROMIS® measures based on molecular weight at 6-weeks, 6-months, and 12-months. Except for 6-month Mobility scores between the SM and AR patients (-0.52 ± 5.46 vs 2.03 ± 6.95; P = 0.02), all other PROMIS® scores were similar. Mobility scores at 6-months were significantly different based on KL (Kellgren and Lawrence) grade (P = 0.005) but all other PROMIS® scores were similar.

CONCLUSION

Average change in PROMIS® scores were significantly different only for 6-month Mobility scores based on divisions and KL grade, but did not achieve minimally clinical important difference in most timepoints. Further studies are needed to investigate whether improvement is observed in specific patient populations.

Is the Combination of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hyaluronic Acid the Best Injective Treatment for Grade II-III Knee Osteoarthritis? A Prospective Study

Background

Knee osteoarthritis is a common disease with increasing incidence and prevalence in western countries. It can cause severe pain and functional limitations, thereby representing a threat for patients' quality of life and a burden for national health systems. Intra-articular injections with hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) have been used for decades in order to reduce the symptoms caused by osteoarthritis. In recent years, a combination of HA and PRP has been introduced in clinical practice with the aim to minimize the clinical presentation of osteoarthritis and potentially delay articular degeneration.

Materials and Methods

Sixty cases with grade II-III knee osteoarthritis according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification were included in a prospective study, focused on the evaluation of clinical and functional outcomes after intra-articular knee injections. Cases were randomly divided into three groups. Twenty cases (Group A) were injected with HA, 20 (Group B) had PRP, and the remaining 20 (Group C) received a combination of HA and PRP. Basal WOMAC score and VAS score were recorded before the treatment and repeated within 3 and 6 months after the treatment.

Results

At 6-month follow-up, Group C (PRP + HA) was the one with the lowest WOMAC and VAS mean values. It was also the only group that reported a reduction in the two values both in the first three months and in the following three months. No major complication was recorded.

Conclusion

The combination of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid can be effective in the treatment of grade II-III knee osteoarthritis in a short-to-mid-term scenario. It represents an innovative and valuable alternative to the administration of its two components alone.

Different molecular weights of hyaluronan research in knee osteoarthritis: A state-of-the-art review

Osteoarthritis (OA), the most common form of arthritis, is characterized by progressive cartilage destruction, concomitant adaptive osteogenesis, and loss of joint function. The progression of OA with aging is associated with a decrease in native hyaluronan (HA, hyaluronate or hyaluronic acid) with a high molecular weight (HMW) in synovial fluid and a subsequent increase in lower MW HA and fragments. As HMW HA possesses numerous biochemical and biological properties, we review new molecular insights into the potential of HA to modify OA processes. Different MWs in the formulation of products appear to have varying effects on knee OA (KOA) pain relief, improved function, and postponing surgery. In addition to the safety profile, more evidence indicates that intraarticular (IA) HA administration may be an effective option to treat KOA, with a particular emphasis on the use of HA with fewer injections of higher MW, including potential applications of HA of very HMW. We also analyzed published systemic reviews and meta-analyses of IA HA in treating KOA in order to discuss their conclusions and consensus statements. According to its MW, HA may offer a simple way to refine therapeutic information in selective KOA.

The efficacy and safety of intra-articular botulinum toxin type A injection for knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular Botulinum Toxin type A (BTA) injection in the management of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The literature retrieval was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. Databases including Pubmed, Web of science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs that comparing the effects of intra-articular BTA injection with control interventions on patients with KOA. The primary outcomes involved pain and function improvements as well as the occurrence of adverse events. Seven RCTs comprising 548 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, BTA injection exhibited greater pain reduction at 4 weeks posttreatment (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI [-1.52, -0.19], p = 0.011), but not 8-24 weeks posttreatment (wk 8, SMD = -0.53, 95% CI [-1.21, 0.15], p = 0.127; wk 12, SMD = -0.34, 95% CI [-0.73, 0.04], p = 0.081; wk 24, SMD = -0.65, 95% CI [-1.52, 0.22], p = 0.144). Additionally, no differences were found between BTA injection versus control intervention on functional improvement at all time points assessed (wk 4, WMD = -5.16, 95% CI [-12.31, 2.00], p = 0.158; wk 8, WMD = -0.98, 95% CI [-5.66, 3.71], p = 0.683; wk 12, WMD = -2.52, 95% CI [-7.54, 2.50], p = 0.325); wk 24, WMD = -3.66, 95% CI [-14.09, 6.76], p = 0.491). There was no significant difference in adverse event rate between the BTA and control group (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.24, 3.18], p = 0.843). This meta-analysis suggests that intra-articular BTA injection could be an efficious and safe strategy for analgesic treatment of KOA. However, evidence is limited due to the small number and heterogeneity of included studies, this urges further and stronger trials to confirm our findings.

Imaging-Guided Musculoskeletal Interventions in the Lower Limb

Imaging guidance is essential for musculoskeletal interventional procedures performed in the lower limb. A strong evidence supports the use of imaging guidance to improve safety, accuracy, and effectiveness of these interventions. Joints, tendons, bursae, and nerves can be effectively approached especially with ultrasound-guided injections. Here, we discuss evidence and technique of the most common image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the lower limb.

Intra-Articular Collagen Injections for Osteoarthritis: A Narrative Review

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most frequent degenerative progressive joint disease worldwide, with the hand, hip, and knee being the most-affected joints. Actually, no treatment can alter the course of OA, and therapy is directed at reducing pain and improving function. The exogenous administration of collagen has been investigated as a possible symptomatic adjuvant or stand-alone treatment for OA. The aim of this review is to assess if intra-articular collagen administration can be considered as a valid and safe therapeutic option for OA. A search in the main scientific electronic databases to identify the available scientific articles about the effects of intra-articular collagen as an OA treatment was performed. The results of the seven included studies showed that the intra-articular administration of collagen may stimulate chondrocytes to produce hyaline cartilage and hinder the normal inflammatory response leading to fibrous tissue formation, reducing symptoms, and improving functionality. The use of type-I collagen as an intra-articular treatment for knee OA was found not only to be effective, but also safe with negligible side effects. The reported findings are strongly promising, highlighting the need for further high-quality research to confirm the consistency of these findings.

Mechanism of immune infiltration in synovial tissue of osteoarthritis: a gene expression-based study

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis is a chronic degenerative joint disease, and increasing evidences suggest that the pathogenic mechanism involves immune system and inflammation.

AIMS

The aim of current study was to uncover hub genes linked to immune infiltration in osteoarthritis synovial tissue using comprehensive bioinformatics analysis and experimental confirmation.

METHODS

Multiple microarray datasets (GSE55457, GSE55235, GSE12021 and GSE1919) for osteoarthritis in Gene Expression Omnibus database were downloaded for analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using Limma package in R software, and immune infiltration was evaluated by CIBERSORT algorithm. Then weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to uncover immune infiltration-associated gene modules. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed to select the hub genes, and the tissue distribution of these genes was analyzed using BioGPS database. Finally, the expression pattern of these genes was confirmed by RT-qPCR using clinical samples.

RESULTS

Totally 181 DEGs between osteoarthritis and normal control were screened. Macrophages, mast cells, memory CD4 T cells and B cells accounted for the majority of immune cell composition in synovial tissue. Osteoarthritis synovial showed high abundance of infiltrating resting mast cells, B cells memory and plasma cells. WGCNA screened 93 DEGs related to osteoarthritis immune infiltration. These genes were involved in TNF signaling pathway, IL-17 signaling pathway, response to steroid hormone, glucocorticoid and corticosteroid. Ten hub genes including MYC, JUN, DUSP1, NFKBIA, VEGFA, ATF3, IL-6, PTGS2, IL1B and SOCS3 were selected by using PPI network. Among them, four genes (MYC, JUN, DUSP1 and NFKBIA) specifically expressed in immune system were identified and clinical samples revealed consistent change of these four genes in synovial tissue retrieved from patients with osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

A 4-gene-based diagnostic model was developed, which had well predictive performance in osteoarthritis. MYC, JUN, DUSP1 and NFKBIA might be biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in osteoarthritis.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Gel Matrix (PRP-GM): Description of a New Technique

Several musculoskeletal conditions are triggered by inflammatory processes that occur along with imbalances between anabolic and catabolic events. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous product derived from peripheral blood with inherent immunomodulatory and anabolic properties. The clinical efficacy of PRP has been evaluated in several musculoskeletal conditions, including osteoarthritis, tendinopathy, and osteonecrosis. When used in combination with hyaluronic acid (HA), a common treatment alternative, the regenerative properties of PRP are significantly enhanced and may provide additional benefits in terms of clinical outcomes. Recently, a new PRP-derived product has been reported in the literature and is being referred to as "plasma gel". Plasma gels are obtained by polymerizing plasmatic proteins, which form solid thermal aggregates cross-linked with fibrin networks. Plasma gels are considered to be a rich source of growth factors and provide chemotactic, migratory, and proliferative properties. Additionally, clot formation and the associated fibrinolytic reactions play an additional role in tissue repair. There are only a few scientific articles focusing on plasma gels. Historically, they have been utilized in the fields of aesthetics and dentistry. Given that the combination of three products (PRP, HA, and plasma gel) could enhance tissue repair and wound healing, in this technical note, we propose a novel regenerative approach, named "PRP-HA cellular gel matrix" (PRP-GM), in which leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) is mixed with a plasma gel (obtained by heating the plasma up) and HA in one syringe using a three-way stopcock. The final product contains a fibrin-albumin network entangled with HA's polymers, in which the cells and biomolecules derived from PRP are attached and released gradually as fibrinolytic reactions and hyaluronic acid degradation occur. The presence of leukocytes, especially monocytes and macrophages, promotes tissue regeneration, as type 2 macrophages (M2) possess an anti-inflammatory feature. In addition, HA promotes the viscosuplementation of the joint and induces an anti-inflammatory response, resulting in pain relief. This unique combination of biological molecules may contribute to the optimization of regenerative protocols suitable for the treatment of degenerative musculoskeletal diseases.

Effects of recurrent intra-articular corticosteroid injections for osteoarthritis at 3 months and beyond: a systematic review and meta-analysis in comparison to other injectables

OBJECTIVE

Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACIs) provide temporary symptom relief in osteoarthritis (OA). This meta-analysis investigated the effects of recurrent IACIs at 3 months and beyond.

DESIGN

We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane from inception to January 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with OA who received recurrent IACIs compared with other injectables, placebo or no treatment (primary outcomes: pain, function). Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals were reported.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs were included (eight knee OA (n = 763), two trapeziometacarpal OA (n = 121)). Patients received between 2 and 8 injections, varying by trial. Trials compared recurrent IACIs with hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), saline or orgotein (follow-up 3-24 months). Greater improvements in pain, function and QoL at 3-24 months were noted for the comparators than with IACIs, with comparators demonstrating an equal or superior effect, or the intervention effect attenuated during follow-up. Recurrent IACIs demonstrated no benefits in pain or function over placebo at 12-24 months. No serious adverse events were recorded. No studies reported on time-to-future interventions, risk of future prosthetic joint infection or other adverse events associated with subsequent joint replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent IACIs often provide inferior (or non-superior) symptom relief compared with other injectables (including placebo) at 3 months and beyond. Other injectables (HA, PRP) often yielded greater improvements in pain and function up to 24 months post-injection. Existing RCTs on recurrent IACIs lack sufficient follow-up data to assess disease progression and time-to-future interventions.

[Hand Osteoarthritis - Clinical Picture and Current Management]

Hand Osteoarthritis - Clinical Picture and Current Management Abstract. Finger joint osteoarthritis (HOA) is a common joint disease that increases with age. The cause is polyethiological. The distal joints of the fingers are most frequently affected, followed by the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb, the proximal interphalangeal joints, and the metacarpophalangeal joints. The clinical symptoms of HOA are painful functional restrictions of the hand and fingers. In terms of therapy, lifestyle modifications and exercise are primarily recommended. Only when these measures are inadequate or not helpful drugs will be recommended be recommended. First-choice drugs are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs applied topically or p.o. Pharmaceutically manufactured chondroitin preparations are also helpful. In severely painful or erosive forms of HOA, corticosteroids can be used intra-articularly. The status of laser therapy or fractionated radiation is (still) unclear. Classical disease-modifying drugs such as those used in inflammatory joint diseases have no therapeutic value. Surgical interventions should be considered if conservative treatments are not sufficiently helpful and hand function is significantly impaired.

Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Herbal Medicine for Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oral Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A computer was used to retrieve all RCTs of CHM in the treatment of KOA from 7 databases (PubMed; Embase; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; China National Knowledge Infrastructure; Chinese VIP Information Database; Chinese Biomedical Database and Wanfang Med Database) from the establishment to August 2021. The literature was organized using NoteExpress, and literature screening and data extraction were conducted by two researchers independently by the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality evaluation was performed using GRADE, and the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 31 RCTs and 3115 cases are included. The following meta-analysis results are observed: (1) WOMAC: CHM vs. placebo (SMD = -0.87, 95% CI: -1.27 to -0.47, P < 0.0001), CHM vs. Western medicine (SMD = -1.64, 95% CI: -2.09 to -1.19, P < 0.00001), and CHM + Western medicine vs. Western medicine (SMD = -2.17, 95% CI: -3.01 to -1.33, P < 0.00001); (2) VAS: CHM vs. Western medicine (SMD = -1.02, 95% CI: -1.63 to -0.41, P < 0.00001) and CHM + Western medicine vs. Western medicine (SMD = -2.68, 95% CI: -4.36 to -1.00, P < 0.00001); (3) Lequesne severity index: CHM vs. Western medicine (SMD = -0.90, 95% CI: -1.40 to -0.39, P = 0.0005) and CHM + Western medicine vs. Western medicine (SMD = -0.94, 95% CI: -1.36 to -0.52, P < 0.0001); (4) Lysholm knee joint function score: CHM vs. Western medicine (MD = 9.10, 95% CI: 4.20 to 14.01, P = 0.0003), and CHM + Western medicine vs. Western medicine in a single trial (MD = 21.15, 95% CI: 19.71 to 22.59, P < 0.00001); (5) SOD: in a single trial, CHM vs. Western medicine (MD = 1.62, 95% CI: 0.9 to 2.30, P < 0.00001) and CHM + Western medicine vs. Western medicine (MD = 17.08, 95% CI: 10.71 to 23.44, P < 0.00001); (6) TNF-α: CHM vs. Western medicine (SMD = -1.90, 95% CI: -2.04 to -0.14, P = 0.02) and CHM + Western medicine vs. Western medicine (SMD = -2.32, 95% CI: -4.33 to -0.30, P = 0.02); (7) IL-1β: CHM vs. Western medicine (SMD = -1.60, 95% CI: -2.36 to -0.84, P < 0.0001); and (8) IL-6: in a single trial, CHM vs. Western medicine (MD = -0.75, 95% CI: -1.20 to -0.30, P = 0.001) and CHM + Western medicine vs. Western medicine (MD = -3.18, 95% CI: -6.24 to -0.12, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of CHM in the treatment of KOA is superior to those of placebo and Western medicine. At the same time, the combination of CHM + Western medicine is superior to Western medicine alone in the treatment of KOA. However, due to the existence of certain biases in the included studies, and the need for further study on the effective components of Chinese medicine, a positive conclusion on the efficacy of traditional CHM in the treatment of KOA cannot be drawn and needs to be confirmed by high-quality clinical RCTs.

Pharmacological use of gamma-aminobutyric acid derivatives in osteoarthritis pain management: a systematic review

Background

Pain is the major complication of osteoarthritis (OA) patients and is a decisive symptom for medical intervention. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) derivatives are optional painkillers but not widely used in pain management of OA patients. We synthesized the efficacy and safety of GABA derivatives for OA pain management.

Methods

We searched Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and ClinicalTrals.gov from inception to 13 October 2021 and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of GABA derivatives with placebo or standard control in OA pain management. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed these studies for risk of bias using Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for RCT.

Results

In total, three eligible RCTs (n = 3) meeting the eligibility criteria were included. Among these RCTs, one focused on hand OA pain management, while two RCTs focused on knee OA. In hand OA, pregabalin reduced numerical rating scale (NRS) score and the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) pain score significantly compared with placebo, and caused 55 AEs. In knee OA, pregabalin reduced visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score significantly with no recorded adverse event (AE). Meanwhile, in knee OA, gabapentin reduced both VAS score and WOMAC pain score compared with acetaminophen and caused 9 AEs.

Conclusions

GABA derivatives seem to be effective and safe in OA pain management. However, future researches with large sample size are needed to further prove the efficacy of GABA derivatives in OA pain control.

Trial registration: CRD42021240225.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00257-z.

Effects of Repeated Co-Injections of Corticosteroids and Hyaluronic Acid on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

We compared the effects of repeated co-injections of corticosteroids plus hyaluronic acid (HA) with the effects of HA injections alone in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted between October 2016 and July 2017 at a medical center. Patients (n = 57) who fulfilled the clinical and radiographic criteria for knee osteoarthritis established by the American College of Rheumatology with a Kellgren-Lawrence score of 2 or 3 were included. They were assigned to either the HA group (n = 29) or corticosteroids plus HA group (n = 28), and injections were administered under ultrasound guidance once a week for 3 consecutive weeks. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were the primary outcomes. Physical functional performance (10-m fast walking and chair-rising time) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were secondary outcomes. The assessment was performed prior to injections, 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months after injections. Data were analyzed through repeated-measures analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Both groups experienced decreased pain and improved physical function and physical functional performance over time. We found significant group × time interaction effects favoring the corticosteroids plus HA group in WOMAC-pain (P = .005) and physical function (P = .005), chair-rising time (P = .032), and KOOS-pain (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated co-injections of corticosteroids plus HA more effectively decreased pain and improved physical function and physical functional performance than injections of HA alone from 1 week through 6 months posttreatment.

Effectiveness of the Thermal Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy Under Fluoroscopy in Patients with Non-operative Advanced Stage Knee Osteoarthritis: 1-Year Follow-Up Results

BACKGROUND

In this study, our aim was to present the 1-year results of the effect of thermal genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) therapy on pain and functional outcomes in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After retrospectively examining the hospital records, 49 knees of 35 patients who had undergone thermal RFA of the superior medial, superior lateral, and inferior medial branches of the genicular nerve under fluoroscopic guidance between July 2019 and December 2020 were included in the study. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores of the patients were recorded before RFA, on the day of RFA, and at the first, sixth, and 12th months postoperatively, as well as their Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores before RFA and at the 12th month postoperatively. Complications developed after the procedure and during the follow-up period were screened.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of the patients were females and 10 males, with a mean age of 77.3 ± 7.9 years (range 61-92 years). The mean VAS score was 8.4 ± 0.9 before RFA, and as 1.7 ± 1.0 right after the procedure, 2.4 ± 1.7 at the first month, 3.4 ± 1.8 at the sixth month, and 4.4 ± 1.9 at the 12th month (p < 0.01). In terms of the WOMAC score, the average value was 69.7 ± 6.4 before the treatment and 36.1 ± 11.8 at the final follow-up at the 12th month (p < 0.01). No complications were observed in any patient during the treatment or the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Non-surgical thermal GNRFA therapy of knee osteoarthritis provides significant outcomes in terms of pain and functionality, with no significant systemic or local side effects. Therefore, the technique can be considered as an alternative to other methods when treating advanced osteoarthritis.

Meta-analysis of clinical trials focusing on hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy (HDP) for knee osteoarthritis

Hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy (HDP) is an injection of a concentrated dextrose solution for the purpose of local treatment of musculoskeletal pain and possible enhancement of repair mechanisms. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the clinical utility of HDP injection for treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing HDP to treat knee OA were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL). Identification and inclusion of RCTs utilizing intra-articular and extra-articular administration of HDP vs administration of other injectate or physical therapy as control for knee OA were included. Primary clinical outcomes were changes in knee WOMAC, pain and function score. Secondary outcomes were adverse events related to HDP. For continuous outcomes with same or different measurements, we calculated, respectively the weighted mean difference (WMD) or the standardized mean difference (SMD), respectively. Results were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random effect models across the included studies and heterogeneity between studies was estimated using the I² index. Five studies comprising a total of 319 treated patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. At a mean of 22.8 weeks follow-up, HDP treatment significantly improved total WOMAC score (WMD = 13.77, 95% CI: 6.75-20.78; p < 0.001; I² = 90%), pain (SMD = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.49-2.17; p < 0.001; I² = 91%) and knee function (SMD = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.45-2.14; p < 0.001; I² = 91%) compared with control group. There were no severe adverse events related to dextrose injection reported in all the included studies. HDP is a promising treatment for knee OA with a reasonable safety profile. Further research in mechanism of HDP activity and long-term follow-up study will be needed for exploring this novel therapy modality.

Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Conclusions of meta-analyses of clinical studies may substantially influence opinions of prospective patients and stakeholders in healthcare. Nineteen meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of primary knee osteoarthritis (pkOA) with stem cells, published between January 2020 and July 2021, came to inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment modality. It is possible that a separate meta-analysis based on an independent, systematic assessment of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells may reach a different conclusion. (2) Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for clinical studies and meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells. All clinical studies and meta-analyses identified were evaluated in detail, as were all sub-analyses included in the meta-analyses. (3) Results: The inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of treating pkOA with stem cells in the 19 assessed meta-analyses were most probably based on substantial differences in literature search strategies among different authors, misconceptions about meta-analyses themselves, and misconceptions about the comparability of different types of stem cells with regard to their safety and regenerative potential. An independent, systematic review of the literature yielded a total of 183 studies, of which 33 were randomized clinical trials, including a total of 6860 patients with pkOA. However, it was not possible to perform a scientifically sound meta-analysis. (4) Conclusions: Clinicians should interpret the results of the 19 assessed meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells with caution and should be cautious of the conclusions drawn therein. Clinicians and researchers should strive to participate in FDA and/or EMA reviewed and approved clinical trials to provide clinically and statistically valid efficacy.

Effectiveness, Compliance, and Safety of Dextrose Prolotherapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis and Metaregression of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the effectiveness, compliance, and safety of dextrose prolotherapy for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library Database, and the Scopus database from their inception to December 31, 2021.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Randomized controlled trials regarding the effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy in knee osteoarthritis were identified. The included trials were subjected to meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Subgroup and random-effects metaregression analyses were performed to explore any heterogeneity (I²) of treatment effects across studies.

RESULTS

A total of 14 trials enrolling 978 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo injection and noninvasive control therapy, dextrose prolotherapy had favorable effects on pain, global function, and quality of life during the overall follow-up. Dextrose prolotherapy yielded greater reductions in pain score over each follow-up duration than did the placebo. Compared with other invasive therapies, dextrose prolotherapy generally achieved comparable effects on pain and functional outcomes for each follow-up duration.Subgroup results indicated that combined intra-articular and extra-articular injection techniques may have stronger effects on pain than a single intra-articular technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Dextrose prolotherapy may have dose-dependent and time-dependent effects on pain reduction and function recovery, respectively, in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Due to remarkable heterogeneity and the risk of biases across the included trials, the study results should be cautiously interpreted.

Intra-articular injections in the treatment of osteoarthritis

Local methods are widely used in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) and play a significant role in the complex therapy of this disease. A special place among them belongs to intra-articular (i/a) administration of drugs. The most widely used for this purpose are glucocorticoids (GC) and hyaluronic acid (HA) drugs. When comparing the effectiveness of these drugs, it was shown that during the 1st month, HA had more favorable results, after 3 months the results did not differ significantly, and after 6 months, the effectiveness of HA was higher. Some authors believe that the optimal result can be obtained with the combined use of HA and GC.The efficacy and tolerability of HA drugs in patients with OA have been studied in numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the data obtained in these studies have been summarized in a number of meta-analyses. At the same time, both in RCTs and in meta-analyses, the results of such treatment were assessed differently. However, when summarizing the materials of various meta-analyses within the framework of a systematic review, it was shown that i/a injections of HA are an effective and safe method of local treatment of OA. However, there are no generally accepted recommendations for the use of HA in the treatment of OA, and the question of their administration in each case is decided individually, taking into account the history, clinical picture, OA phenotype, and tolerability of therapy. The Russian Association of Rheumatologists recommends the use of i/a HA injections in knee OA with synovitis and the use of HA injections to reduce pain and improve joint function.

Pseudo-rheumatic manifestations of limping: Camptodactyly-arthropathy-coxa vara-pericarditis syndrome: Single case report and review of the literature

Camptodactyly-arthropathy-coxa vara-pericarditis (CACP) syndrome is a rare genetic disease characterized by tetrad camptodactyly, noninflammatory arthropathy, coxa vara deformity, and pericardial effusion. Arthropathy typically affects large joints and presents with joint swelling in the absence of other signs of inflammation. We described the case of a girl affected by CACP syndrome caused by a novel compound heterozygous variant in proteoglycan 4 gene (c.2831_2832insT; c.3892C > T) and associated with temporomandibular involvement. The patient received treatment with intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections, which presented rapid but transient improvements of pain and range of motion. A literature review of previously reported CACP patients has been performed. Of the patients. 69.2% (101 out of 146) were Middle Eastern, and 65.7% (96) were consanguineous. The median age of onset was 24 months (interquartile range of 12-36 months), and median age of diagnosis was 96 months (interquartile range of 48-156 months). Arthropathy was always present, mainly involving hips (95.2%), knees (92.4%), wrists (87.7%), elbows (79.5%), and ankles (57.5%). Camptodactyly and pericardial effusion were described, respectively, in 97.3% (142) and 15.1% (22) of patients. The main radiological findings were coxa vara (95.2%), femoral changes (64.4%), intraosseus cysts (14.4%), and bone erosion (5%). Of the patients, 32.9% (48) had received a previous juvenile idiopathic arthritis diagnosis. CACP syndrome can be easily misdiagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. A prolonged lack of response to immunosuppressive therapy associated with typical clinical and radiological features should prompt consideration of this rare syndrome.

A case report of ultrasound-guided knee nerve pulse radiofrequency combined with platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

RATIONABLE

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a disease characterized by noninflammatory degenerative changes of articular cartilage. The main clinical manifestations are joint pain and stiffness. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is thought to treat pain by destroying nerve tissue and changing the physical characteristics of nerve tissue membrane.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patients presents with joint pain and tenderness. Touching around the knee joint will induce pain and joint stiffness when the hand is pressed hard.

INTERVENTIONS

Four patients with knee osteoarthritis underwent pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation in the knee joint cavity under ultrasound guidance and injected 2 mL of 10 mg/mL platelet-rich plasma into the joint cavity once a week for a total of 4 times. Record the patient's Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and the degree of knee movement limitation before treatment, 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.

DIAGNOSES

Four patients with knee osteoarthritis.

OUTCOMES

After treatment, the patient's VAS score improved, and the knee joint mobility function recovered well. Ultrasound-guided knee nerve pulse radiofrequency combined with intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma can effectively improve the knee joint function and reduce the pain of the patient. The clinical effect is significant, and it is worthy of clinical application.

Viscosupplementation in the Therapy for Osteoarthritic Knee

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease that is spreading worldwide due to an aging population. This is not simply a disease caused by worn out joints, but a complex disease accompanied by various mechanisms such as inflammatory reactions. Among various joints, knee joints show degenerative changes earlier than other joints because they carry most of the weight load, causing social-economic problems. In the case of OA of the knee that does not respond to relatively simple conservative treatments such as physical therapy or medication, intra-articular injection is preferred. However, intra-articular injection drugs have limited effectiveness and uncertainties. There are several intra-articular viscous supplement drugs such as hyaluronic acid. Tissue regeneration active materials such as polydeoxyribonucleotide and polynucleotide are also newly used. The objective of this paper was to compare effects of intra-articular supplementation drugs used for degenerative arthritis of the knee.

Intra-articular corticosteroid injection and genicular nerve block under ultrasound guidance in pain control of knee osteoarthritis

Background

Chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a frequent disease among the elderly. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACSI) was commonly adopted to alleviate knee OA-related pains. Recently, Genicular nerve block (GNB) has emerged as a new alternative technique. The current study aimed to investigate the efficacy of those two approaches when guided with ultrasound and to determine which one offers better results. This study included 40 patients with painful chronic knee OA (Nine males and 31 females, age ranged from 44 to 65 years) and were randomly assigned to two equal groups. Groups 1 was managed with ultrasound-guided IACSI and group 2 with ultrasound-guided GNB using a mixture of lidocaine and Triamcinolone Acetonide. The baseline mean visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oxford knee score (OKS) for the group 1 were 87.10 and 51.3, while for group 2 were 87.75 and 53.25 respectively. Follow up values were obtained at 2, 4 and 8 weeks using VAS and OKS.

Results

The VAS score and OKS score were significantly lower in the GNB group and IACSI group at 2, and 4 weeks after the procedure (p < 0.001 for all), then returned near baseline values at 8 weeks. When the two groups were compared according to changes in VAS and OKS from baseline at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, GNB group showed significant alleviation of pain (mean reduction of 58.5, 53.3, and 9.25 points at 2, 4, and 8 weeks versus 44.9, 39.4, and 5.6 points at the IACSI groups, p < 0.001 at 2 and 4 weeks, p < 0.006 at 8 weeks). Similarly at the OKS, the GNB group showed significantly better results (33.50, 28.60, and 8.5 at GNB and 26.45, 20.10, 5.25 at IACSI. p < 0.001 at all periods).

Conclusions

Both GNB and IACSI are effective methods to relieve chronic knee osteoarthritis-related pains. When compared to each other, GNB showed more significant pain relief and functional improvement than IACSI.

Injectable therapies for knee osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative arthritis that mainly affects older adults. Over time, osteoarthritis can result in significant and sustained discomfort, pain, and disability. Current treatment focuses on the alleviation of pain and functional impairment. While arthroplasty is the definitive management option, it subjects patients to surgical complications, and the possibility of surgical revisions. In addition, many patients are not surgical candidates. Instead, pharmacological therapy is recommended first-line for most patients. On top of pharmacological therapy, there are a range of non-operative procedural options available. However, leading professional guidelines vary in their recommendations for these agents. Therefore, we present a review of recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses on injectable corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), mesenchymal stem cell injections, and ozone therapy. The preliminary data reveal the strongest evidence in favour of corticosteroid injections, although there are promising findings regarding the long-term efficacy of HA and PRP.

Hypertonic Dextrose Prolotherapy, an alternative to intra-articular injections with Hyaluronic Acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Intra-articular injections with hyaluronic acid are recommended in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA); however, hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy (HDP) has been reported as effective and safe. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of HDP for pain reduction and improvement of function in individuals with KOA in comparison with hyaluronic acid by meta - analysis. The search was performed in electronic databases. Six studies were included (395 participants). No statistically significant differences were found between prolotherapy and hyaluronic acid in pain control in the short term, however, in the sub-analysis where included only the studies that used intra-articular injection within the prolotherapy scheme, an effect was found in favor of the prolotherapy groups (d = -1.33, 95% CI -2.50 to -0.16, p (z) 0.03). Also, an effect was found in favor of the prolotherapy group in the improvement in function (d = -1.05, 95% CI -2.03 to -0.08, p (z) 0.03). No major adverse reactions or side effects were reported in any of the studies. HDP appears to be an effective intervention to decrease pain and improve function in KOA, with efficacy similar to intra-articular injections with hyaluronic acid in the short-term follow-up. Nonetheless, better-quality clinical trials are necessary.

Orthopedic Surgeons' Views of Hyaluronic Acid Formulations in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Background and Objectives: Multiple hyaluronic acid (HA) products were approved and marketed to manage osteoarthritis (OA). Although these products are widely prescribed by orthopedic surgeons to manage OA, especially knee OA, the therapeutic value of these products is highly uncertain. Few studies with significant limitations in their designs have indicated positive outcomes among OA patients treated with HA; however, their results were inconclusive. Thus, we aimed to explore the therapeutic value of different HA products in alleviating knee OA pain and improving patients’ physical function from the orthopedic surgeons’ perspective. Materials and Methods: This was a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in which practicing orthopedic surgeons in two countries (e.g., Saudi Arabia and Jordan) were invited to participate. The 10-item, newly developed questionnaire inquired about the respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, country, years of experience), and their opinions regarding the efficacy of HA products in the management of OA (e.g., efficacy in improving mobility and alleviating pain). Results: Out of the 200 orthopedic surgeons who were invited to participate, 122 (61%) filled out the questionnaire. Most of the respondents were from Saudi Arabia (58%), aged 35 to 55 years (68%), had at least 10 years of experience (69%), and male (98%). About 80% of the respondents reported prescribing HA, such as Hyalgan^®, Orthovisc^®, Hyalubrix^®, and Crespine Gel^®. About 66% of the respondents believed that HA was moderately to highly effective in managing knee OA, and 34% believed that HA was either ineffective or mildly effective. Pain at the site of injection (44.3%) and rash or local skin reactions (22.1%) were the most commonly reported adverse events. Conclusions: The variations in the formulation of different HA brands (e.g., molecular weight and cross-linking) did not seem to offer any therapeutic advantage. HA might have value in the management of knee OA; however, its value is highly uncertain and necessitates more well-designed studies to further examine its therapeutic value.