Periumbilical vs transumbilical laparoscopic incision: A patients' satisfaction-centered randomised trial

Transumbilical laparoscopy for pneumoperitoneum establishment: a comprehensive multicentre evaluation affirming safety, feasibility, and a range of clinical benefits

Introduction

Transumbilical laparoscopy (TUL) has emerged as a promising technique for establishing pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, offering potential safety, feasibility, and clinical benefits. This retrospective multicentre study aims to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of TUL in the management of gallbladder diseases.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 2,543 patients who underwent TUL between 2011 and 2021 across various medical institutions in Italy. Data collection included demographic, clinical, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters. Standardized protocols were followed for preoperative and postoperative management. The TUL technique involved precise anatomical incision and trocar placement.

Results

The study demonstrated favorable outcomes associated with TUL, including a low conversion rate to open surgery (0.55%), minimal intraoperative complications (0.16%), and short hospital stays (average 2.4 days). The incidence of incisional hernias was notably low (0.4%). Comparison with existing literature revealed consistent findings and provided unique insights into the advantages of TUL.

Discussion

Despite limitations, such as the absence of a control group and the retrospective nature of the study, the findings contribute valuable insights to the literature. They inform surgical decision-making and advance patient care in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder diseases.

Conclusion

Transumbilical laparoscopy shows promise as a safe and feasible technique for establishing pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study's findings support its clinical benefits, including low conversion rates, minimal complications, and short hospital stays. Further research, including prospective studies with control groups, is warranted to validate these results and optimize patient outcomes.

Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Modified Bidirectional Intra-Umbilical Incision versus Infra-Umbilical Incision for Direct Trocar Insertion in Gynaecological Laparoscopy: A randomised controlled trial

Objectives

This study aimed to describe a modified, curved, deep, bidirectional, intra-umbilical, vertical incision for primary trocar insertion and prospectively compare its intraoperative and postoperative outcomes with an infra-umbilical incision in gynaecologic laparoscopy.

Methods

Between August 2019 and March 2021, 110 patients subjected to the direct trocar insertion technique for laparoscopic intervention were classified into two groups. Group A comprised 55 cases of infra-umbilical incision, whereas group B comprised 55 cases of a modified, curved, longitudinal, deep, bidirectional, intra-umbilical incision. Afterwards, intraoperative and postoperative assessments were performed.

Results

The increase in the numbers of parity, gravidity and previous caesarean sections was found to be statistically significant; a smaller number of infertility complaints were observed in group B. Similarly, group B expressed a statistically significant less peri-trocar CO2 leakage (46 [83.6%] patients versus 28 [50.9%] patients) and more tightness of the primary portal entry (45 [81.8%] patients versus 30 [54.5%] patients) when compared to group A throughout the whole operation. After a one-month follow-up, a statistically significant (P = 0.029) decrease in the Observer Scar Assessment Scale and Patient Scar Assessment Scale scores in group B (10.4 ± 4.2 and 11.8 ± 4.3, respectively), demonstrating better cosmoses when compared to group A (13.3 ± 5.7 and 16.0 ± 6.8, respectively).

Conclusion

Performing a modified, curved, deep, bidirectional, intra-umbilical, vertical incision for the insertion of a primary laparoscopic trocar (i.e. Darwish laparoscopic entry) is a simple and fast step that results in the elimination of intraoperative gas leakage and trocar slippage without the need for any additional sutures. Aesthetically, it results in a better scar with satisfactory cosmoses when compared to an infra-umbilical incision.

The Comparison of Postoperative Umbilical Port Site-Related Complications Between Transumbilical and Periumbilical Incision After Laparoscopic Surgery in Children

Introduction: No studies have directly compared postoperative umbilical port site (UPS)-related complications between transumbilical and periumbilical incisions (TUI and PUI) after laparoscopic surgery in children. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 324 children of ≤15 years of age who underwent laparoscopic repair (LR) for inguinal hernia, via either a TUI or PUI, between 2010 and 2020. UPS-related complications, such as wound infection and umbilical deformity, were compared between TUI and PUI. We also investigated the risk factors for the development of UPS-related complications after LR. Results: TUIs and PUIs were used for 228 and 96 children, respectively. The incidence rates of postoperative wound infection and umbilical deformity in the PUI group were higher in comparison to the TUI group; although not to a statistically significant extent (7.3% versus 5.3%, P = .451, 6.3% versus 4.8%, P = .593). One case of incisional hernia at the UPS was seen in the TUI group. In the univariate analysis, sex, age, weight for age Z-score, nutrition status, insertion and closure time, total operative time, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, blood loss, and comorbidities were not significantly associated with the development of UPS-related complications after LR. Conclusion: The incidence of UPS-related complications in TUI and PUI was not significantly different. Due to the low incidence of UPS-related complications, it was difficult to draw conclusions regarding contributing factors; however, meticulous care should be taken to avoid UPS-related complications when closing the UPS (Ethical approval No. 2019-24).

Randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic results of midline incision versus off-midline incision for specimen extraction in laparoscopic colectomy

PURPOSE

A notable advantage of laparoscopic colorectal surgery is that only a small incision at the extraction site is necessary, which is considered to be cosmetically beneficial. Meanwhile, the optimal extraction site for the resected specimen in laparoscopic colectomy is controversial in terms of cosmetic benefit. This randomized controlled trial compares midline and off-midline extraction sites in laparoscopic colectomy in patients with colon cancer, with consideration of cosmetic benefits as the primary endpoint.

METHODS

Included were patients that underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy at WMUH between October 2014 and February 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to either midline incision group or off-midline incision group. Prospectively collected data included cosmetic results (patients and observer assessment scale) and complications including incidence of incisional hernia, SSI, and pain. This trial was registered with UMIN Clinical Trials (UMIN000028943).

RESULTS

Finally, 98 patients with colorectal cancer were analyzed. No significant differences were found between the two groups in patient and observer assessment scales of cosmetic results (midline 8 ± 1.1 vs off-midline 11 ± 5.9 p = 0.16, midline 13.5 ± 6.6 vs off-midline 15 ± 11 p = 0.58, respectively) or in postoperative pain. However, incisional hernia occurred in four cases in the midline group (8%), which was significantly higher than that in the off-midline group (no cases, 0%).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in terms of cosmetic benefit, the primary endpoint, between the two groups. In this study, only the extraction site location was compared; future studies will examine differences depending on the incisional direction, including the incidence of incisional hernia.

Modified Intraumbilical Versus Infraumbilical Entry Method at Laparoscopy: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the optimal laparoscopic entry method. Whether a transumbilical or periumbilical incision is beneficial for the initial peritoneal access has been debated. These 2 methods have their own advocates, since each has its own benefits and disadvantages. Furthermore, the lack of consensus extends to the type of entry technique [Hasson, Veress needle (VN), direct trocar]. We have conducted a study comparing a modified intraumbilical technique (MIT), a novel method that combines a VN insertion through a modified direct-trocar access, with the standard infraumbilical VN technique. Our aim is to determine which technique is a better route for the initial umbilical trocar.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 406 patients from a prospectively maintained database has been performed. Two cohorts of cases have been analyzed (VN=198; MIT=208). Primary outcomes were intraoperative access-related events, entry failure, and long-term wound complications. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 and 6 months and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous emphysema, extraperitoneal insufflation, and difficult entry (>2 VN insertions) occurred more frequently in the VN group (P=0.011, 0.023, and 0.023, respectively). There were 5 (2.52%) failed entries in the VN group and none in the MIT group (P=0.085). Regarding postoperative complications, seroma of the wound occurred more frequently in the VN group (P=0.033). At a mean follow-up of 18.4 months, 13 (3.20%) trocar-site hernias were detected, equally distributed among both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MIT eliminates the risk of failed entries and some complications associated with the VN technique without an increase in umbilical wound infection and facilitates a proper closure of the umbilical incision to secure a low trocar-site hernia rate. Halfway between open and closed techniques for laparoscopic entry, MIT is a safe and feasible procedure that embodies the advantages of both methods and may constitute an advantageous alternative to the infraumbilical VN entry approach.

Development and psychometric testing of a Learning Behaviour Questionnaire among Chinese undergraduate nursing students

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate a new Learning Behaviour Questionnaire (LBQ) for the undergraduate nursing students.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was performed in two phases. Phase 1 of the study focused on questionnaire development to create a pool of items, while phase 2 focused on validity and reliability testing.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were used to explore nursing undergraduates' perception of learning behaviour. A two-round modified Delphi method was used to test content validity and quantify the degree of consistency in questionnaire items. An item analysis, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and an internal consistency reliability check were conducted. Criterion-related validity was demonstrated through correlations with Self-Regulated Learning Scale for Undergraduates (SRLS-U). A sample of 114 nursing students was evaluated in test-retest reliability to confirm stability.

RESULTS

The final LBQ consisted of four factors for the 19-item questionnaire with a 5-point rating from '1' (Fully disagree) to '5' (fully agree). The content validity was 0.890. EFA revealed the presence of four factors, including 'strategy', 'attitude', 'motivation' and 'degree of satisfaction'. The CFA indicated good fit indexes for the proposed model (χ²/df=1.866, root mean square residual=0.037, comparative fit index =0.950, goodness-of-fit index =0.929, Tucker-Lewis index=0.941, adjusted goodness-of-fit index=0.907 and root mean square error of approximation=0.049). The LBQ correlated significantly with SRLS-U subscales (r=0.742-0.837, p<0.01). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the whole questionnaire was 0.936, while the Cronbach's alphas of the four factors were 0.828, 0.826, 0.804 and 0.805, respectively. The test-retest reliabilities of the four factors were 0.886, 0.904, 0.852 and 0.875, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The validity and reliability of the LBQ were satisfying. The LBQ is a short, well-developed questionnaire that can serve as a generic assessment tool for measuring learning behaviour for Chinese undergraduate nursing students.Cite Now.

Transumbilical versus periumbilical incision for laparoscopic surgery: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether a transumbilical or periumbilical incision is beneficial for the initial peritoneal access in laparoscopic abdominal surgery has been debated. Our aim is to determine whether a transumbilical or periumbilical incision is a better route for the initial umbilical trocar.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published before March 2020. The meta-analysis calculated the pooled effect size by using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Five trials involving 783 patients were reviewed. The transumbilical group significantly reduced operation time (mean difference: -7.73; 95% confidence interval: -13.10 to -2.35) when compared to the periumbilical group. The length of hospital stay, mean pain scores on operation day and postoperation day 1 did not differ significantly between the two groups. Moreover, the incidence of surgical site infection, cosmetic satisfaction, and complication rate did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

A transumbilical incision is better than a periumbilical incision for laparoscopic surgery as it saves operation time. Hence, we suggest transumbilical incisions for the initial peritoneal access in laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

Comparison of postoperative pain at umbilical wound after conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy between transumbilical and infraumbilical incisions: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Transumbilical incision has been applied in single-incision laparoscopy. Evidence for the effect of transumbilical incision on postoperative pain compared with infraumbilical incision is still lacking.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in a university hospital. Patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to have transumbilical or infraumbilical incision. Postoperative pain was measured using visual analog score at 6, 24 h, and 7 days post operation. Secondary outcomes were analgesic usage, length of stay, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), wound numbness, and hypersensitivity. Risk ratio and mean difference (MD) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Adjusted analysis was done, if clinical unbalanced characteristics presented. The study was registered at http://ClinicalTrial.gov (ID NCT02738710).

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were enrolled in which 51 patients were randomized to each interventional group. Postoperative pain was not significantly different between the groups with the MD of - 0.07 (95% CI - 0.47, 0.35). Paracetamol usage was significantly 1 tab (95% CI - 1.9, - 0.1) less after transumbilical incision, but this was not significant after adjusting for unbalanced characteristics. Superficial SSI rate was much higher in the transumbilical than the infraumbilical group, i.e., 16 versus 4%, but this was not significant (p = 0.070). Satisfaction scores at 3 months were not different between the groups, with the corresponding means of 8.9 [standard deviation (SD) 1.3] and 9.0 (SD 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Transumbilical incision had non-significant different pain compared to infraumbilical incision. Most patients in both groups were satisfied with the operation at 3 months. A further large RCT is required for comparing SSI between the two incisions.