Variability in the prescribing of intravenous fluids: A cross sectional multicentre analysis of clinical practice

Intravenous fluid therapy in perioperative and critical care setting-Knowledge test and practice: An international cross-sectional survey

PURPOSE

In the absence of recent international recommendations supported by scientific societies like Anesthesiology or Intensive Care Medicine, healthcare professionals (HCP) knowledge on IV fluid is expected to vary. We undertook a cross-sectional survey, aiming to assess prescription patterns and test the knowledge of HCP for IV fluid use in the operating room (OR) and intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

An online international cross-sectional survey was conducted between October 20, 2019, and November 27, 2021. The survey included multiple-choice questions on demographics, practice patterns and knowledge of IV fluids, and a hemodynamically unstable patient assessment.

RESULTS

1045 HCP, from 97 countries responded to the survey. Nearly three-quarters reported the non-existence of internal hospital or ICU-based guidelines on IV fluids. The respondents' mean score on the knowledge assessment questions was 46.4 ± 14.4. The cumulative mean scores were significantly higher among those supervising trainees (p = 0.02), specialists (p < 0.001) and those working in high-income (p < 0.001) countries. Overall performance of respondents on the knowledge testing for IV fluid was unsatisfactory with only 6.5% respondents performed above average.

CONCLUSION

There is a wide difference in the knowledge and prescription of IV fluids among the HCP surveyed. These findings reflect the urgent need for education on IV fluids.

Drowning in antibiotics

INTRODUCTION

The National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths (NCEPOD) report recommended that 'fluid prescribing be given the same value as drug prescribing', yet fluid prescription is commonly delegated to junior doctors despite being a notoriously challenging topic. When antibiotics are given as an infusion they are diluted in 100ml of fluid, which is often unaccounted for when thinking about a patient's fluid requirements. This closed-loop audit aimed to assess first, intravenous (IV) fluid therapy and second, electrolyte prescribing compliance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, with and without the additional fluid given with antibiotic administration.

METHODS

Two retrospective audits were performed. Total fluid and electrolyte volume received with and without antibiotic fluids was correlated with recommendations in the NICE guidelines. Between cycles 1 and 2, potassium chloride with sodium chloride and glucose (PSG) was introduced as an alternative to IV maintenance fluid, and bolusing of antibiotics was mandatory.

RESULTS

When analysing total fluid volume input per day, 10.4% and 7.45% of patients met their fluid requirement accurately in the first and second cycles, respectively. Within cycle 1, the mean total additional fluid that was given over 3 days with antibiotics was 1,572.73ml. In cycle 2, this decreased to 469.44ml when antibiotics were given as a bolus.

CONCLUSIONS

In this closed-loop audit we noted that patients receiving IV fluids and IV antibiotics received too much additional fluid when the antibiotic dilution fluid was taken into account. Additional fluid was reduced alongside the proportion of electrolyte complications when bolusing of antibiotics was introduced. We recommend that that all nurses are trained to give antibiotics as a bolus because it can help to reduce fluid-related complications.

Perioperative Fluid Management in Surgical Patients: A Review

Intravenous (IV) fluids are one of the most widely prescribed medications. Despite their frequent usage, IV fluids are often not used appropriately. High-quality evidence to guide the surgeon in the perioperative period is sparse. A plethora of choices for IV fluids exists with limited evidence to help guide the surgeon in specific patient populations and situations. To address this, the authors have set out to provide a critical review of commonly used IV fluids to treat surgical patients. Gaps in the existing literature for the surgical population will also be discussed as potential target areas for future research.

Interdisciplinary knowledge gaps on intravenous fluid management in adult patients: Survey among physicians and nurses of a university hospital

RATIONALE

Intravenous (IV) fluids are frequently involved in iatrogenic complications in hospitalized patients. Knowledge of IV fluids seems inadequate and is not covered sufficiently in standard medical education.

METHODS

Two surveys were developed, based on the 2016 British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline 'IV fluid therapy in adults in hospital', to provide insight on the learning needs and expectations of physicians and nurses. Each survey focused on profession-specific practice and consisted of three parts: demographics, knowledge questions and evaluation of current habits. Physicians and nurses practicing in a Belgian university hospital were invited to complete the survey electronically, respectively, in January and May 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 103 physicians (19%) and 259 nurses (24%) participated. Although every indication for fluid therapy may require a specific fluid and electrolyte mixture, and hence, knowledge of their exact composition, most physicians and nurses did not know the composition of commonly prescribed solutions for IV infusion. Senior physicians did not score better than juniors did on questions concerning the daily needs of a nil-by-mouth patient. The availability of an IV fluid on the ward guides physicians to prescribe IV fluids (17%). Nurses (56%) feel they share responsibility in fluid management as they frequently intervene in urgent situations. More than half of participants (70% of physicians, 79% of nurses) indicated a need for additional information.

CONCLUSIONS

A clear need for more structured information on IV fluids was identified. Both physicians and nurses struggle with fluid therapy. Continuing education on IV fluid management, emphasizing multidisciplinary collaboration, and monitoring evidence-based practice is essential to support the clinical decision process in daily practice.

Intravenous fluid therapy: a multi-national, cross-sectional survey of common medical student resources

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate prescription of intravenous fluid therapy is highly prevalent in hospitals, with up to 1 in 5 patients suffering from preventable, additional morbidity. Since trainee physicians are frequently responsible for prescribing intravenous fluids, it is possible that common medical student resources do not sufficiently cover the topic. There is a paucity of recent literature on this issue, which this study was designed to address.

METHODS

Two original evaluation tools were created by the authors to evaluate reference books, official guidelines, and online reference sources commonly used by medical students in the United States of America, Australia, and the United Kingdom on their coverage of foundational and clinically relevant principles of intravenous fluid prescription. The choice of student resources was guided by a literature search and personal experience. A total of 10 resources was assessed.

RESULTS

Resources were generally deficit in their coverage of basic intravenous fluid topics. The total points each topic accumulated ranged from 0.5 (5%) to 7.5 (75%), with the median score being 4.5 (45%), on a scale from 0 to 10 points.

CONCLUSIONS

Popular medical student resources poorly cover intravenous fluid therapy topics. This may be contributing to inadequate fluid prescribing practices.

Efficacy and Safety of Isotonic and Hypotonic Intravenous Maintenance Fluids in Hospitalised Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Hyponatraemia is a known complication in hospitalised children receiving maintenance intravenous fluid. Several studies have been published to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous fluids in children. However, there is still an ongoing debate regarding the ideal solution to be used in the paediatric population. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the safety and efficacy of administering isotonic versus hypotonic intravenous maintenance fluid in hospitalised children. An extensive search was undertaken on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library on 28 December 2020. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. We used the random-effects model for all analyses. Risk ratio (RR) and mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. The quality of each study was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for RCTs. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021229067). Twenty-two RCTs with a total of 3795 participants were included. The studies encompassed surgical and medical patients admitted to intensive care unit as well as to general wards. We found that hypotonic fluid significantly increases the risk of hyponatremia at both ≤24 h (RR 0.34; 95% CI: 0.26–0.43, p < 0.00001) and >24 h (RR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.36–0.64, p < 0.00001). Isotonic fluid increases the risk of hypernatraemia at ≤24 h (RR 2.15; 95% CI: 1.24–3.73, p = 0.006). The prevalence of hyponatraemia was also higher in the hypotonic group at both ≤24 h (5.7% vs. 23.3%) and >24 h (6.0% vs. 26.3%). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of developing adverse outcomes between the two groups. Mean serum and urine sodium as well as serum osmolality/osmolarity was lower in the hypotonic group. Isotonic solution is protective against the development of hyponatraemia while hypotonic solution increases the risk of hyponatraemia.

Improving intravenous fluid prescribing

Intravenous (IV) fluid therapy is integral to the care of patients in hospitals but involves complex decisions. Errors in fluid prescribing are common, leading to significant harm due to inappropriate fluid type, rate or volume. British national guidelines have been developed to improve prescribing, but adherence has been generally poor. The Scottish Government has set up a National IV Fluid Improvement Programme to implement national guidelines throughout Scotland. This article reviews the need for such guidance and discusses how the Scottish National IV Fluid Improvement Programme hopes to achieve its aims across Scotland. This may provide an improvement framework for fluid prescribing in other regions.

Surgical Fluid Prescribing: When Are the Last Orders?

Introduction Inappropriate fluid prescriptions result in excess morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. The majority of prescriptions are done by foundation year one doctors (FY1s) despite repeated evidence of poor knowledge and prescription habits among them when it comes to prescribing fluids. Materials and methods This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a 798-bed district general teaching hospital. Data for one year from an out-of-hours (OOHs) electronic task record system was extracted. An analysis was performed on all surgical 'Fluid Reviews' jobs recorded in the period from August 1, 2018, to August 7, 2019. Results During the 371-day study period, 1,283 requests for fluid reviews were made. Of these, 1,228 (95.7%) were assigned to the FY1 and 1,185 (92.3%) were requested by nurses. There was a mean of 3.5 ±2.1 requests per day. A bimodal distribution of requests was noted with peaks at 1900 and 2400. There was no discernible variation between different days of the week. Conclusion Fluid reviews were most frequently requested by nursing staff at times that coincide with their handover and the commencement of a new fluid chart at midnight. Reducing the number of inappropriate requests for fluid reviews may reduce the opportunity for inappropriate fluid prescribing. Improvements could be achieved through interventions in the ward rounds and by encouraging a multidisciplinary approach to education on fluid prescribing. Reducing the number of fluid prescriptions OOHs promotes continuity of care and education through patient follow-ups.