Intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy in sequential treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: To be, or not to be, that is the question A cohort study

[Laparoendoscopic hybrid treatment of a patient with choledocholithiasis, cholecystitis and large duodenal diverticula]

We present laparoendoscopic hybrid treatment of a patient with choledocholithiasis, cholecystitis and large duodenal diverticula. A 69-year-old patient underwent one-stage hybrid laparoendoscopic intervention. Despite the difficult situation caused by large duodenal diverticula and calculus in terminal part of common bile duct, hybrid technique with rendez-vous procedure allowed successful lithoextraction and cholecystectomy. The follow-up examination found no residual biliary calculi. Hybrid laparoendoscopic intervention in the treatment of a patient with choledocholithiasis, cholecystitis and large duodenal diverticula provided optimal clinical effect, reduced the risk of postoperative complications and shortened in-hospital treatment.

Clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of chronic cholecystitis with gallstones

Chronic cholecystitis is a common disease that causes inflammation in the gallbladder and is usually associated with gallstones. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been widely used as a minimally invasive surgical technique to treat this condition. However, the clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of chronic cholecystitis with gallstones needs further investigation. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treating chronic cholecystitis with gallstones. 90 patients with chronic cholecystitis and gallstones were randomly divided into control and research groups. The control group underwent traditional open cholecystectomy, while the research group received laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Perioperative indexes, oxidative stress indexes, serum inflammatory factors, liver function indexes and the incidence of complications were observed and compared. Results showed that laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly reduced the operation time, blood loss, anal exhaust time, abdominal pain duration, and hospital stay compared to traditional open cholecystectomy (P < 0.05). Moreover, laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly reduced the levels of oxidative stress indexes (GSH-Px), inflammatory factors (IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP), and liver function indexes (TBIL, AST, and ALT) compared to traditional open cholecystectomy. Moreover, the complication rate of the research group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for chronic cholecystitis with gallstones is a safe and effective procedure that reduces the perioperative stress response and promotes the rapid recovery of the postoperative body. The findings of this study provide a basis for the clinical promotion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the preferred surgical treatment for chronic cholecystitis with gallstones.

Residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage: what is the best intervention strategy?

BACKGROUND

The best intervention approach for residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage remains controversial, especially during the period of indwelling T tube and the formation of a sinus. The purpose of the study was to estimate the effects of two therapeutic modalities, namely endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and choledochfiberscope via the T-tube sinus tract (CDS) on residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients with residual choledocholithiasis after choledochotomy were included in the study, 50 of which underwent ERCP and 62 patients experienced choledochoscopy via the T-tube sinus tract. The primary outcome measures included the success rate of remove biliary stones, T-tube drainage time, and the average length of hospital stay. The secondary objective was to consider incidence of adverse events including cholangitis, bile leakage, T-tube migration, pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation. After hospital discharge, patients were followed up for two years and the recurrence of choledocholithiasis was recorded.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the success rate of stone removal between the two groups. Compared to CDS group, T-tube drainage time and the average length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERCP group. The incidence of complications (cholangitis and bile leakage) in the ERCP group was lower than that in the CDS group, but there was no statistically significant difference. When the T-tube sinus tract is not maturation, ERCP was the more appropriate endoscopic intervention to remove residual choledocholithiasis, particularly complicated with cholangitis at this time period.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCP is a safe and effective endoscopic intervention to remove residual choledocholithiasis after choledocholithotomy T-tube Drainage without the condition of T-tube sinus tract restriction.

Primary closure combined with C-tube drainage through cystic duct after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe and feasible for patients

OBJECTIVE

Biliary duct management is of great significance after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis accompanied with common bile duct (CBD) stones. This study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of primary closure with C-tube drainage through cystic duct after LC + LCBDE.

METHODS

Through a retrospective study, 290 patients who underwent LC + LCBDE in our hospital from January 2019 to April 2022 were enrolled and divided into 2 groups. 143 patients underwent primary closure with C-tube drainage through cystic duct (C-tube group) and the other 147 patients underwent traditional T-tube drainage (T-tube group). Personal information, perioperative examinations, surgical results, and follow-up results were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the average age, gender, the mean of CBD diameters and the rate of comorbidities (acute cholecystitis, obstructive jaundice, acute pancreatitis and acute cholangitis) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Hospital stay, postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the C-tube group than T-tube group (P < 0.05). In addition, the average time of placing and removal the drainage tubes was significantly less than those of the T-tube group (P < 0.05). This study also showed significant differences in the incidence of postoperative abdominal infection and soft tissue infection in the two groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications including cholangitis, bile duct stenosis, mortality in two groups. There were also no significant differences between the two groups of the recurrence of CBD stones, reoperation and readmition in 30 days during the median follow-up of 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with T tube drainage, patients with C-tube drainage after LC + LCBDE with primary closure of cystic duct recovered faster and had fewer complications. C-tube drainage is a safe and feasible treatment option for patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis.

[Modern approaches to the treatment of patients with a complicated form of gallstone disease in the Botkin hospital]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with gallstone disease complicated by cholelithiasis after endoscopic retrograde papillosphincterotomy with lithoextraction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed treatment outcomes in 229 patients with gallstone disease complicated by cholelithiasis between 2016 and 2020. Simultaneous surgery was performed in 31 patients, early cholecystectomy (after 1-3 days) - in 78 cases, delayed cholecystectomy (after 4-7 days) - in 35 cases and delayed cholecystectomy in 14-30 days after endoscopic retrograde papillosphincterotomy with lithoextraction in 85 cases.

RESULTS

Simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and surgery in early period after endoscopic retrograde papillosphincterotomy with lithoextraction are followed by less surgery time, few postoperative complications and less hospital-stay.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and early surgery after endoscopic retrograde papillosphincterotomy with lithoextraction are preferred for patients with complicated gallstone disease. However, this requires adherence to strict criteria for patient selection.

Acute acalculous cholecystitis and cardiovascular disease, which came first? After two hundred years still the classic chicken and eggs debate: A review of literature

The existence of a close association between disease of the biliary tract and disease of the heart is known from the mists of time.

Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) can be defined as an acute necro inflammatory disease of the gallbladder in the absence of cholelithiasis.

AAC is a challenging diagnosis. The atypical clinical onset associated to a paucity and similarity of symptoms and to laboratory data mimicking cardiovascular disease (CVD) often results in under and misdiagnosed cases. Moreover, AAC has commonly a fulminant course compared to calculous cholecystitis and it is often associated with gangrene, perforation and empyema as well as considerable morbidity and mortality (up 50%). Early diagnosis is crucial to a prompt treatment in order to avoid complications and to increase survivability.

Even today, although scientific evidence dating two hundred years has shown a close association between AAC and CVD, due to the lack of RCT, there is still a lot of confusion regarding the relationship and consequently the clinical management AAC and CVD.

In addition, emergency physicians are not always familiar with transient ECG changes with AAC.

The aim of this review was to provide evidence regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatment of the complex association between AAC and CVD.

Our main findings indicate that AAC should be suspected after each general disease leading to hypoperfusion such as cardiovascular diseases or cerebrovascular diseases or major heart or aortic surgery. ECG changes in absence of significant laboratory data for IMA (Acute myocardial infarction) could be related to a misdiagnosed AAC.

US – Ultrasonography-plays a key role in the early diagnosis and also in the follow up of AAC.

Cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy as unique or sequential represent the two prevailing treatment options for AAC.

•

AAC should be suspected after each general disease leading to hypoperfusion such as cardiovascular diseases or cerebrovascular diseases or major heart or aortic surgery.

•

ECG changes in absence of significant laboratory data for IMA could be related to a misdiagnosed AAC.

•

Cholecystectomy is an only definitive treatment for AAC.

•

The first report on this theme after 20 years.

Single-stage intraoperative ERCP combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus preoperative ERCP Followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVES

The optimal treatment strategy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis is still controversial. We conducted an up-to-date meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of the intra- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) + LC procedure with the traditional pre-ERCP +  laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) procedure in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to September 2020. Published randomized controlled trials comparing intra-ERCP + LC and pre-ERCP + LC were considered. This meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager Version 5.3, and outcomes were documented by pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Eight studies with a total of 977 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding CBD stone clearance (RR = 1.03, P = .27), postoperative papilla bleeding (RR = 0.41, P = .13), postoperative cholangitis (RR = 0.87, P = .79), and operation conversion rate (RR = 0.71, P = .26). The length of hospital stay was shorter in the intra-ERCP + LC group (MD = -2.75, P < .05), and intra-ERCP + LC was associated with lower overall morbidity (RR = 0.54, P < .05), postoperative pancreatitis (RR = 0.29, P < .05) and cannulation failure rate (RR = 0.22, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-ERCP + LC was a safer approach for patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis. It could facilitate intubation, shorten hospital stay, and lower postoperative complications, especially postoperative pancreatitis, and reduce stone residue and reduce the possibility of reoperation for stone removal.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCBDE + LC) with intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (IO-ERCP + LC) for the treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct (CBD) stones.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane Library from their inception dates to April 2020, for studies that compared the efficacy and safety of LCBDE + LC with those of IO-ERCP + LC in patients with gallbladder and CBD stones. The technical success, morbidity, major morbidity, biliary leak, postoperative pancreatitis, conversion, retained stones, operative time, and postoperative hospital stay were compared between these two approaches.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials involving 860 patients were evaluated. Overall, no significant difference was found between LCBDE + LC and IO-ERCP + LC regarding technical success, morbidity, major morbidity, and the conversion rate. Biliary leak and retained stones were significantly more prevalent in the LCBDE + LC group, while postoperative pancreatitis was significantly more prevalent in the IO-ERCP + LC group.

CONCLUSIONS

LCBDE + LC and IO-ERCP + LC have similar efficacy and safety in terms of technical success, morbidity, major morbidity, and conversion rate. However, LCBDE + LC is associated with a higher biliary leak rate, lower postoperative pancreatitis rate, and higher rate of retained stones.

Surgical (Open and laparoscopic) management of large difficult CBD stones after different sessions of endoscopic failure: A retrospective cohort study

Objectives

For complicated common bile duct stones (CBDS) that cannot be extracted by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), management can be safely by open or laparoscopic CBD exploration (CBDE). The study aimed to assess these surgical procedures after endoscopic failure.

Methods

We analyzed 85 patients underwent surgical management of difficult CBDS after ERCP failure, in the period from 2013 to 2018.

Results

Sixty-seven (78.8%) and 18(21.2%) of our patients underwent single and multiple ERCP sessions respectively. An impacted large stone was the most frequent cause of ERCP failure (60%). Laparoscopic CBDE(LCBDE), open CBDE(OCBDE) and the converted cases were 24.7% (n = 21), 70.6% (n = 60), and 4.7% (n = 4) respectively. Stone clearance rate post LCBDE and OCBDE reached 95.2% and 95% respectively, Eleven (12.9%) of our patients had postoperative complications without mortality. By comparing LCBDE and OCBDE; there was a significant association between the former and longer operative time. On comparing, T-tube and 1ry CBD closure in both OCBDE and LCBDE, there was significantly longer operative time, and post-operative hospital stays in the former. Furthermore, in OCBDE group, choledocoscopy had an independent direction to 1ry CBD repair and significant association with higher stone clearance rate, shorter operative time, and post-operative hospital stay.

Conclusion

Large difficult CBDS can be managed either by open surgery or laparoscopically with acceptable comparable outcomes with no need for multiple ERCP sessions due to their related morbidities; furthermore, Open choledocoscopy has a good impact on stone clearance rate with direction towards doing primary repair that is better than T-tube regarding operative time and post-operative hospital stay.

•

Large difficult CBD stones can be managed either by open surgery or laparoscopically with acceptable comparable outcomes.

•

No need for multiple ERCP sessions due to their related morbidities.

•

Open choledocoscopy has a good impact on stone clearance rate with direction towards doing primary repair.

•

Primary repair is better than T-tube regarding operative time and post-operative hospital stay.

Surgical (Open and laparoscopic) management of large difficult CBD stones after different sessions of endoscopic failure: A retrospective cohort study

Objectives

For complicated common bile duct stones (CBDS) that cannot be extracted by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), management can be safely by open or laparoscopic CBD exploration (CBDE). The study aimed to assess these surgical procedures after endoscopic failure.

Methods

We analyzed 85 patients underwent surgical management of difficult CBDS after ERCP failure, in the period from 2013 to 2018.

Results

Sixty-seven (78.8%) and 18(21.2%) of our patients underwent single and multiple ERCP sessions respectively. An impacted large stone was the most frequent cause of ERCP failure (60%). Laparoscopic CBDE(LCBDE), open CBDE(OCBDE) and the converted cases were 24.7% (n = 21), 70.6% (n = 60), and 4.7% (n = 4) respectively. Stone clearance rate post LCBDE and OCBDE reached 95.2% and 95% respectively, Eleven (12.9%) of our patients had postoperative complications without mortality. By comparing LCBDE and OCBDE; there was a significant association between the former and longer operative time. On comparing, T-tube and 1ry CBD closure in both OCBDE and LCBDE, there was significantly longer operative time, and post-operative hospital stays in the former. Furthermore, in OCBDE group, choledocoscopy had an independent direction to 1ry CBD repair and significant association with higher stone clearance rate, shorter operative time, and post-operative hospital stay.

Conclusion

Large difficult CBDS can be managed either by open surgery or laparoscopically with acceptable comparable outcomes with no need for multiple ERCP sessions due to their related morbidities; furthermore, Open choledocoscopy has a good impact on stone clearance rate with direction towards doing primary repair that is better than T-tube regarding operative time and post-operative hospital stay.