1
|
Takagi K, Fuji T, Yamada M, Umeda Y. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy after right hemicolectomy: A case report. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:2324-2325. [PMID: 38331607 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.01.179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kosei Takagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
| | - Tomokazu Fuji
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Motohiko Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yuzo Umeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu Y, Yuan Y, Gao G, Liang Y, Li T, Li T. Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery for colon cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery: a propensity score-matching analysis. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:3025-3033. [PMID: 37950110 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01741-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Robotic surgery is widely used in gastrointestinal surgery. While the application of robotic surgery for colon cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS) remains controversial for the fear of intra-abdominal adhesions. This study was aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic colectomy for patients with PAS. The medical records of colon cancer patients who underwent robotic surgery at our hospital from June 2015 to August 2020 were extracted and analyzed. Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was implemented to minimize selection bias. We compared perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications between the patients with PAS or with no PAS (NPAS). A total of 79 patients (PAS group) and 348 patients (NPAS group) were included in our study. After PSM, 79 patients of PAS group and 79 patients of NPAS group were selected for further analysis. We did not find statistical difference in operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph nodes retrieved, length of hospital stay and hospital costs between the two groups. No difference was noted in the incidence of postoperative complications, conversion to open surgery and mortality between the two groups. According to the results of multivariate analysis, PAS was not identified as risk factor for postoperative complications. Left hemicolectomy and perioperative transfusion were associated with postoperative complications. PAS did not negatively affect the outcomes of robotic colectomy. After individually preoperative assessment, robotic surgery could be performed feasibly and safely for colon cancer patients with PAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaxiong Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Yuli Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Gengmei Gao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Yahang Liang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Taiyuan Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xiang ZQ, Zhu FF, Zhao SQ, Li HJ, Long ZT, Wang Q, Dai XM, Zhu Z. Laparoscopic versus open repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched cohort studies. Int J Surg 2023; 109:963-971. [PMID: 36999779 PMCID: PMC10389376 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The effectiveness of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) versus open repeat hepatectomy (ORH) on recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) is unclear. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes of LRH and ORH in patients with RHCC with a meta-analysis of studies based on propensity score-matched cohorts. METHODS A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library with Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords until 30 September 2022. The quality of eligible studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Mean difference (MD) with a 95% CI was used for the analysis of continuous variables; odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was used for binary variables; and hazard ratio with 95% CI was used for survival analysis. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS Five high-quality retrospective studies with 818 patients were included; 409 patients (50%) were treated with LRH and 409 (50%) with ORH. In most surgical outcomes, LRH was superior to ORH: less estimated blood loss, shorter operation time, lower major complication rate, and shorter length of hospital stay (MD=-225.9, 95% CI=[-360.8 to -91.06], P =0.001; MD=66.2, 95% CI=[5.28-127.1], P =0.03; OR=0.18, 95% CI=[0.05-0.57], P =0.004; MD=-6.22, 95% CI=[-9.78 to -2.67], P =0.0006). There were no significant differences in the remaining surgical outcomes: blood transfusion rate and overall complication rate. In oncological outcomes, LRH and ORH were not significantly different in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS For patients with RHCC, most surgical outcomes with LRH were superior to those of ORH, but oncological outcomes with the two operations were similar. LRH may be a preferable option for the treatment of RHCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Si-Qi Zhao
- Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | - Zhu Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery
- Department of Education and Training, The First Affiliated Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zheng KL, Yin XY, Gu HY, Li CJ, Ni CM, Zhang GX, Wang H, Wang Z, Jin G. Impact of previous upper/lower abdominal surgery on pancreatic surgical outcomes and complications: a propensity score matching study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1517-1524. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02494-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
5
|
Harimoto N, Araki K, Hagiwara K, Yamanaka T, Ishii N, Tsukagoshi M, Igarashi T, Watanabe A, Kubo N, Shirabe K. Gastrectomy history as a predictor of post-hepatectomy complications. Surg Today 2021; 52:494-501. [PMID: 34427789 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02366-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The effect of a history of gastrectomy on patients undergoing hepatectomy is unclear. We investigated the relationship between postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher and a history of gastrectomy in patients undergoing hepatectomy. METHODS The subjects of this retrospective analysis were 474 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy at our institute for hepatic malignancy, classified into groups of those with or without a history of gastrectomy and those with or without postoperative complications. We compared the clinicopathological factors between the groups. RESULTS There were no hospital deaths. Gastrectomy history was identified in 22 patients (4.6%) and was significantly associated with advanced age, low body mass index, male sex, decreased serum albumin level, decreased hemoglobin level, low PNI, low CONUT score, high incidence of postoperative complications, and longer hospital stay. Multivariate analyses revealed that the independent risk factors for postoperative complications were gastrectomy history, an albumin-bilirubin score of 2/3, primary liver cancer, high serum creatinine level, advanced age, and prolonged operation time. CONCLUSIONS Gastrectomy history was an independent predictor of postoperative complications in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatic malignancies. Patients with a history of gastrectomy were likely to suffer postoperative bile leakage and pneumonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norifumi Harimoto
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showamachi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan.
| | - Kenichiro Araki
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showamachi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Kei Hagiwara
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showamachi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yamanaka
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showamachi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Norihiro Ishii
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showamachi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Mariko Tsukagoshi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showamachi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Takamichi Igarashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showamachi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Akira Watanabe
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showamachi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Norio Kubo
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showamachi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Ken Shirabe
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showamachi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sahakyan MA, Tholfsen T, Kleive D, Yaqub S, Kazaryan AM, Buanes T, Røsok BI, Labori KJ, Edwin B. Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Following Prior Upper Abdominal Surgery (Pancreatectomy and Prior Surgery). J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1787-1794. [PMID: 33170476 PMCID: PMC8275495 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04858-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Previous abdominal surgery can be a risk factor for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures. Today, distal pancreatectomy is increasingly performed laparoscopically. This study investigates the consequences of prior upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). METHODS Patients who had undergone LDP from April 1997 to January 2020 were included. Based on the history and type of PUAS, these were categorized into three groups: minimally invasive (I), open (II), and no PUAS (III). To reduce possible confounding factors, the groups were matched in 1:2:4 fashion based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiology grade. RESULTS After matching, 30, 60, and 120 patients were included in the minimally invasive, open and no PUAS groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of intraoperative outcomes. Postoperative morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay were similar. Open PUAS was associated with higher Comprehensive Complication Index (33.7 vs 20.9 vs 26.2, p = 0.03) and greater proportion of patients with ≥ 2 complications (16.7 vs 0 vs 6.7%, p = 0.02) compared with minimally invasive and no PUAS. Male sex, overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2), diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasia, and open PUAS were risk factors for severe morbidity in the univariable analysis. Only open PUAS was statistically significant in the multivariable model. CONCLUSIONS PUAS does not impair the feasibility and safety of LDP as its perioperative outcomes are largely comparable to those in patients without PUAS. However, open PUAS increases the burden and severity of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mushegh A Sahakyan
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
- Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care , Oslo University Hospital , Oslo, Norway.
| | - Tore Tholfsen
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dyre Kleive
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheraz Yaqub
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Airazat M Kazaryan
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway
- Department of Faculty Surgery N2, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Trond Buanes
- Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care , Oslo University Hospital , Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bård Ingvald Røsok
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Jørgen Labori
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care , Oslo University Hospital , Oslo, Norway
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chong Y, Koh YX, Teo JY, Cheow PC, Chow PK, Chung AY, Chan CY, Goh BKP. Impact of non-liver-related previous abdominal surgery on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resections: a propensity score-matched controlled study. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:591-597. [PMID: 33569726 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08321-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The presence of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) has traditionally been considered to add difficulty to and increase risk of complications of laparoscopic procedures. This study aims to analyse the impact of non-liver-related PAS on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resections (MILRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS After exclusion of patients with concomitant major surgical procedures as well as previous liver resections, 515 consecutive patients undergoing MILR in Singapore General Hospital from 2006 to 2019 were analysed, consisting of 161 MILR in patients with previous abdominal surgery (WPAS) and 354 MILR in patients without previous abdominal surgery (WOPAS). Propensity score-matched (PSM) comparison was performed between WPAS and WOPAS groups. In addition, subgroup analysis was made comparing previous upper or lower abdominal surgery and open versus minimally invasive approach of PAS. Outcomes measured include those associated with operative difficulty such as open conversion rates, operative time, blood loss, as well as morbidity and mortality rates. RESULTS MILR outcomes in patients WPAS are not inferior to those WOPAS. Overall open conversion rate was 8.2%, higher in patients WOPAS compared to patients WPAS (11.9% versus 3.5%, p = 0.015). Operating time (p = 0.942), blood loss (p = 0.063), intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.750), length of hospital stay (p = 0.206), morbidity (p = 0.217) and 30- and 90-day mortality (p = 1 & p = 0.367) were comparable between the two groups and subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION Outcomes of MILR in patients with previous non-liver-related abdominal surgery are not inferior to patients without previous abdominal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvette Chong
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Jin-Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Peng-Chung Cheow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pierce K Chow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Level 5, 20 College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore. .,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|