Prognostic effect of the new 5-factor modified frailty index in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia – A prospective cohort study

Blood group is a long-term cardiovascular risk factor after carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

ABO blood group system has been clinically related to an increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Preliminary data relating Rhesus (Rh) factor and these outcomes also have been published. Our aim was to analyse the impact of blood group on the short and long-term outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2012 to 2019, patients from a referral centre who underwent CEA for atherosclerotic carotid stenosis were prospectively followed. Our primary outcomes were long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 21-69). Time-to-event analysis was used to determine the effect of ABO and Rh groups in long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-four patients were included, with a mean age of 70.1 ± 9.1 years. Eighteen (25.7%) patients with O type and 48 (42.1%) patients with non-O type presented coronary artery disease (odds ratio [OR]: 2.313, 5-95% confidence interval (CI) 1.245-4.297, p = .008). Patients Rh+ presented significantly more congestive heart failure, 23 (14.7%), p = .03. The incidence of MACE in the long-term was higher in non-O patients (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.034; CI: 1.032-4.010, p = .040). Rh- patients, presented a higher incidence of perioperative MINS. However, there was no statistically significant association with long-term risk of MACE.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of MACE in long-term analysis was higher in non-O blood type and 30-day MINS was significantly more common amongst Rh- patients. The benefit from a more complete preoperative cardiac study in these patients should be performed.

Prognostic nutritional index and modified frailty index, independent risk factors for recompression in elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

BACKGROUND

To identify some clinical and laboratory independent risk factors for postoperative recompression among elderly osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 287 elderly OVCF patients after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Relevant risk factors for recompression were screened and further analyzed through multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Within postoperative 1 year, recompression had occurred in 72 patients, with an incidence of 25.1% (72/287). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that mean spinal BMD <  - 2.85 (OR: 4.55, 95%CI 2.22-9.31, P < 0.001), ODI ≥ 68.05% (OR: 6.78, 95%CI 3.16-14.55, P < 0.001), PNI score < 43.1 (OR: 2.81, 95%CI 1.34-5.82, P = 0.005), and mFI score ≥ 0.225 (OR: 8.30, 95%CI 3.14-21.95, P < 0.001) were four distinct risk factors that independently contributed to postoperative recompression.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal BMD, ODI, PNI and mFI independently predict recompression in OVCF patients after PVP treatment.

The 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index is a Concise and Effective Predictor of 30-Day Adverse Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy

INTRODUCTION

Frailty is a clinically identifiable condition characterized by heightened vulnerability. The 5-item Modified Frailty Index provides a concise calculation of frailty that has proven effective in predicting adverse perioperative outcomes across a variety of surgical disciplines. However, there is a paucity of research examining the validity of 11-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) in carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study aimed to investigate the association between mFI-5 and 30-day outcomes of CEA.

METHODS

Patients underwent CEA were identified from American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted database from 2012 to 2021. Patients with age<18 were excluded. Patients were stratified into four cohorts based on their mFI-5 scores: 0, 1, 2, or 3+. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day perioperative outcomes adjusting for preoperative variables with P value<0.1.

RESULTS

Compared to controls (mFI-5 = 0), patients mFI-5 = 1 had higher risk of stroke (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.333, P = 0.02), unplanned operation (aOR = 1.38, P < 0.01), and length of stay (LOS) > 7 days (aOR = 0.814, P < 0.01). Patients with mFI-5 = 2 had higher stroke (aOR = 1.719, P < 0.01), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (aOR = 1.315, P = 0.01), sepsis (aOR = 2.243, P = 0.01), discharge not to home (aOR = 1.200, P < 0.01), 30-day readmission (aOR = 1.405, P < 0.01). Compared with controls, patients with mFI-5≥3 had higher mortality (aOR = 1.997 P = 0.02), MACE (aOR = 1.445, P = 0.03), cardiac complications (aOR = 1.901, P < 0.01), pulmonary events (aOR = 2.196, P < 0.01), sepsis (aOR = 3.65, P < 0.01), restenosis (aOR = 2.606, P = 0.02), unplanned operation (aOR = 1.69, P < 0.01), LOS>7 days (aOR = 1.425, P < 0.01), discharge not to home (aOR = 2.127, P < 0.01), and 30-day readmission (aOR = 2.427, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The mFI-5 is associated with 30-day mortality and complications including stroke, MACE, cardiac complications, pulmonary complications, sepsis, and restenosis. Additionally, elevated mFI-5 scores correlate with an increased likelihood of unplanned operations, extended LOS, discharge to facilities other than home, and 30-day readmissions, all of which could negatively impact long-term prognosis. Therefore, mFI-5 can serve as a concise yet effective metric of frailty in patients undergoing CEA.

A systematic review of frailty assessment tools used in vascular surgery research

OBJECTIVE

Frailty is common in vascular patients and is recognized for its prognostic value. In the absence of consensus, a multitude of frailty assessment tools exist. This systematic review aimed to quantify the variety in these tools and describe their content and application to inform future research and clinical practice.

METHODS

Multiple cross-disciplinary electronic literature databases were searched from inception to August 2022. Studies describing frailty assessment in a vascular surgical population were eligible. Data extraction to a validated template included patient demographics, tool content, and analysis methods. A secondary systematic search for papers describing the psychometric properties of commonly used frailty tools was then performed.

RESULTS

Screening 5358 records identified 111 eligible studies, with an aggregate population of 5,418,236 patients. Forty-three differing frailty assessment tools were identified. One-third of these failed to assess frailty as a multidomain deficit and there was a reliance on assessing function and presence of comorbidity. Substantial methodological variability in data analysis and lack of methodological description was also identified. Published psychometric assessment was available for only 4 of the 10 most commonly used frailty tools. The Clinical Frailty Scale was the most studied and demonstrates good psychometric properties within a surgical population.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial heterogeneity in frailty assessment is demonstrated, precluding meaningful comparisons of services and data pooling. A uniform approach to assessment is required to guide future frailty research. Based on the literature, we make the following recommendations: frailty should be considered a continuous construct and the reporting of frailty tools' application needs standardized. In the absence of consensus, the Clinical Frailty Scale is a validated tool with good psychometric properties that demonstrates usefulness in vascular surgery.

Preoperative Frailty Assessment Predicts Postoperative Mortality, Delirium and Pneumonia in Elderly Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) for postoperative mortality, delirium and pneumonia in patients over 65 years of age undergoing elective lung cancer surgery.

METHODS

Data were collected from a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted in a general tertiary hospital from January 2017 to August 2019. In total, the study included 1372 elderly patients aged over 65 who underwent elective lung cancer surgery. They were divided into frail group (mFI-5, 2-5), prefrail group (mFI-5, 1) and robust group (mFI-5, 0) on the basis of mFI-5 classification. The primary outcome was postoperative 1-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pneumonia and postoperative delirium.

RESULTS

Frailty group had the highest incidence of postoperative delirium (frailty 31.2% versus prefrailty 1.6% versus robust 1.5%, p < 0.001), postoperative pneumonia (frailty 23.5% versus prefrailty 7.2% versus robust 7.7%, p < 0.001), and postoperative 1-year mortality (frailty 7.0% versus prefrailty 2.2% versus robust 1.9%. p < 0.001). Frail patients have significantly longer length of hospitalization than those in the robust group and prefrail patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a clear link between frailty and increased risk of postoperative delirium (aOR 2.775, 95% CI 1.776-5.417, p < 0.001), postoperative pneumonia (aOR 3.291, 95% CI 2.169-4.993, p < 0.001) and postoperative 1-year mortality (aOR 3.364, 95% CI, 1.516-7.464, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

mFI-5 has potential clinical utility in predicting postoperative death, delirium and pneumonia incidence in elderly patients undergoing radical lung cancer surgery. Frailty screening of patients (mFI-5) may provide benefits in risk stratification, targeted intervention efforts, and assist physicians in clinical decision-making.

The 5-factor modified frailty index is a novel predictive marker of death from other diseases after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer

AIM

The 5-factor modified frailty index (MFI-5) is a stratification tool to evaluate a patient's frailty. This study determined whether the MFI-5 is associated with short- and long-term outcomes after curative gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 447 consecutive patients who underwent curative gastrectomy, and evaluated their overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients (16.8%) had high MFI-5 scores (MFI-5 ≥3). A high MFI-5 score was significantly associated with advanced age, male sex and severe postoperative complications. Patients with high MFI-5 scores had significantly poorer OS and RFS than those with low MFI-5 scores (5-year OS, 80.3% vs 59.7%, P < 0.01; 5-year RFS, 77.4% vs 54.9%, P < 0.01). Additionally, a high MFI-5 score was an independent predictor for OS (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% CI 1.09-2.61; P = 0.02) and RFS (hazard ratio, 1.80, 95% CI 1.19-2.74; P = 0.01). However, cancer-specific survival was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The MFI-5 score can be predictive of postoperative morbidity and deaths from other disease after curative gastrectomy after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 750-756.

The Five-Factor Modified Frailty Index as a Predictor of Outcomes in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson's Disease

Introduction Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases worldwide. Though there are many pharmacological therapeutics approved today for PD, surgical interventions such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) have shown convincing symptom mitigation and minimal complication rates in aggregate. Recently, the concept of frailty - defined as reduced physiologic reserve and function affecting multiple systems throughout the patient - has gained traction as a predictor of short-term postoperative morbidity and mortality. As such, the Modified Frailty Index-5 (mFI-5) is a postoperative morbidity predictor based on five factors and has been used in neurosurgical subspecialties such as tumor, vascular, and spine. Yet, there is minimal literature assessing frailty in the field of functional neurosurgery. With the prevalence of DBS in PD, this study evaluated the mFI-5 as a predictor of postoperative complications in a selected patient population. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2010-2019 Database was queried for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, as well as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes pertaining to DBS procedures in PD patients. Each patient was scored by the mFI-5 protocol and stratified into groups of No Frailty (mFI-5=0), Moderate Frailty (mFI-5=1), and Significant Frailty (mFI-5≥2). The No Frailty group was used as a reference in multivariate and univariate analyses of the groups. Results A total of 1,645 subjects were included in the study and were subcategorized into groups of No Frailty (N=877), Moderate Frailty (N=561), and Significant Frailty (N=207) based on their frailty scores. The subjects' mean age was 65.8±9.4 years. Overall, 1,161 (70.6%) were male, while 484 (29.4%) were female. With reference to the No Frailty group in multivariate analysis, patients with moderate frailty experienced greater unplanned readmission (OR 2.613, 95% CI 1.143-5.973, p=0.023), while those with significant frailty experienced greater unplanned readmission (OR 3.723, 95% CI 1.376-10.073, p=0.010), any readmission (OR 2.396, 95% CI 1.098-5.230, p=0.028), non-home discharge (OR 4.317, 95% CI 1.765-10.562, p<0.001), and complications in aggregate (OR 2.211, 95% CI 1.285-3.806, p=0.004). Conclusions Until now, the available clinical tools were limited in providing accurate predictions with minimal information for postoperative outcomes in DBS for PD patients. Our data give clinicians insight into the relationship between frailty and surgical outcomes and will assist physicians in preparing for postoperative care by predicting outcomes of significantly frail PD patients receiving DBS therapy.

Application of MFI-5 in severe complications and unfavorable outcomes after radical resection of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Frailty is considered a characteristic manifestation of physiological decline in multiple organ systems, which significantly increases the vulnerability of elderly individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. While studies have demonstrated that the 11-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-11) can effectively predict adverse outcomes following radical resection of CRC, there is a lack of research on the applicability of the 5-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) within this patient population.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we examined a cohort of CRC patients aged 65 years and above who had undergone radical resection. For each patient, we calculated their mFI-5 score, considering a score of ≥ 2 as an indication of frailty. We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to assess the association between the mFI-5 and adverse outcomes as well as postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Patients with an mFI-5 score ≥ 2 exhibited a significantly higher incidence of serious postoperative complications (53% vs. 30%; P = 0.001) and experienced a longer hospital stay [19.00 (15.00-24.50) vs. 17.00 (14.00-20.00); P < 0.05]. Notably, an mFI-5 score greater than 2 emerged as an independent risk factor for severe postoperative complications (odds ratio: 2.297; 95% confidence interval: 1.216 to 4.339; P = 0.01). Furthermore, the mFI-5 score displayed predictive capabilities for severe postoperative complications with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.629 (95% confidence interval: 0.551 to 0.707; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The mFI-5 demonstrates a high level of sensitivity in predicting serious complications, prolonged hospital stays, and mortality following radical resection of colorectal carcinoma. As a practical clinical assessment tool, the mFI-5 enables the identification of high-risk patients and facilitates preoperative optimization.

Prognostic value of 11-factor modified frailty index in postoperative adverse outcomes of elderly gastric cancer patients in China

BACKGROUND

Preoperative evaluation of frailty is limited to a few surgical procedures. However, the evaluation in Chinese elderly gastric cancer (GC) patients remains blank.

AIM

To validate and estimate the prognostic value of the 11-index modified frailty index (mFI-11) for predicting postoperative anastomotic fistula, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and long-term survival in elderly patients (over 65 years of age) undergoing radical GC.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study which included patients who underwent elective gastrectomy with D2 Lymph node dissection between April 1, 2017 and April 1, 2019. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were admission to ICU, anastomotic fistula, and 6-mo mortality. Patients were divided into two groups according to the optimal grouping cutoff of 0.27 points from previous studies: High risk of frailty marked as mFI-11^High and low risk of frailty marked as mFI-11^Low. Survival curves between the two groups were compared, and univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to explore the relationship between preoperative frailty and postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing radical GC. The discrimination ability of the mFI-11, prognostic nutritional index, and tumor-node-metastasis pathological stage to identify adverse postoperative outcomes was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

A total of 1003 patients were included, of which 13.86% (139/1003) were defined as having mFI-11^High and 86.14% (864/1003) as having mFI-11^Low. By comparing the incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups of patients, it was found that mFI-11^High patients had higher rates of 1-year postoperative mortality, admission to ICU, anastomotic fistula, and 6-mo mortality than the mFI-11^Low group (18.0% vs 8.9%, P = 0.001; 31.7% vs 14.7%, P < 0.001; 7.9% vs 2.8%, P < 0.001; and 12.2% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed mFI-11 as an independent predictive indicator for postoperative outcome [1-year postoperative mortality: Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.432, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 2.599-6.343, P = 0.003; admission to ICU: aOR = 2.058, 95%CI: 1.188-3.563, P = 0.010; anastomotic fistula: aOR = 2.852, 95%CI: 1.357-5.994, P = 0.006; 6-mo mortality: aOR = 2.438, 95%CI: 1.075-5.484, P = 0.033]. mFI-11 showed better prognostic efficacy in predicting 1-year postoperative mortality [area under the ROC curve (AUROC): 0.731], admission to ICU (AUROC: 0.776), anastomotic fistula (AUROC: 0.877), and 6-mo mortality (AUROC: 0.759).

CONCLUSION

Frailty as measured by mFI-11 could provide prognostic information for 1-year postoperative mortality, admission to ICU, anastomotic fistula, and 6-mo mortality in patients over 65 years old undergoing radical GC.

R2CHA2DS2-VA predicts the cardiovascular risk after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

R2CHA2DS2-VA score has been used to predict short and long-term outcomes in many cardiovascular diseases. This study aims to validate the R2CHA2DS2-VA score as a long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) predictor after CEA. Secondary outcomes were also assessed regarding the incidence of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), major adverse limb events (MALE), and acute heart failure (AHF).

METHODS

From January 2012 to December 2021, patients (n= 205) from a Portuguese tertiary care and referral center that underwent CEA with regional anesthesia (RA) for carotid stenosis were selected from a previously collected prospective database, and a post-hoc analysis was performed. Demographics and comorbidities were registered. Clinical adverse events were assessed 30-days after the procedure and in the subsequent long-term surveillance period. Statistical analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Of the patients enrolled, 78.5% were males with a mean age of 70.44 ± 8.9 years. Higher scores of R2CHA2DS2-VA were associated with long-term MACE (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 1.390; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.173-1.647) and mortality (aHR 1.295; 95% CI 1.08-1.545) CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the potential of the R2CHA2DS2-VA score to predict long-term outcomes such as AMI, AHF, MACE, and all-cause mortality in a population of patients submitted to carotid endarterectomy.

Frailty as a Superior Predictor of Dysphagia and Surgically Placed Feeding Tube Requirement After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Relative to Age

Frailty is a measure of physiological reserve that has been demonstrated to be a discriminative predictor of worse outcomes across multiple surgical subspecialties. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most common neurosurgical procedures in the United States and has a high incidence of postoperative dysphagia. To determine the association between frailty and dysphagia after ACDF and compare the predictive value of frailty and age. 155,300 patients with cervical stenosis (CS) who received ACDF were selected from the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) utilizing International Classification of Disease, tenth edition (ICD-10) codes. The 11-point modified frailty index (mFI-11) was used to stratify patients based on frailty: mFI-11 = 0 was robust, mFI-11 = 1 was prefrail, mFI-11 = 2 was frail, and mFI-11 = 3 + was characterized as severely frail. Demographics, complications, and outcomes were compared between frailty groups. A total of 155,300 patients undergoing ACDF for CS were identified, 33,475 (21.6%) of whom were frail. Dysphagia occurred in 11,065 (7.1%) of all patients, and its incidence was significantly higher for frail patients (OR 1.569, p < 0.001). Frailty was a risk factor for postoperative complications (OR 1.681, p < 0.001). Increasing frailty and undergoing multilevel ACDF were significant independent predictors of negative postoperative outcomes, including dysphagia, surgically placed feeding tube (SPFT), prolonged LOS, non-home discharge, inpatient death, and increased total charges (p < 0.001 for all). Increasing mFI-11 score has better prognostic value than patient age in predicting postoperative dysphagia and SPFT after ACDF.

Red Blood Cell Distribution Width Predicts Myocardial Infarction and Mortality After Vascular Surgery-A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the association between preoperative Red blood cell Distribution Width (RDW) and postoperative outcomes, including myocardial infarction (MI), and mortality.

METHODS

A prospective cohort including all patients submitted to elective vascular arterial surgery at a university hospital. The primary and secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day MI, respectively.

RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dependent functional status were more prevalent in deceased patients. After multivariable analysis, age (adjusted OR 1.08, 95% Confidence Interval [1.01-1.15], p = 0.027) and RDW-standard deviation (RDW-SD) (1.08 [1.01-1.16], p = 0.032) remained independent predictors of mortality. Patients with MI had higher rates of diabetes, CKD, dependent functional status, ASA physical status IV, and insulin medication. After multivariable analysis, dependent functional status (4.8 [1.6-15.0], p = 0.007), insulin medication (4.4 [1.5-12.6], p = 0.007) and RDW-SD (1.10 [1.02-1.19], p = 0.020) were independent predictors of MI.

CONCLUSION

RDW-SD independently predicted postoperative MI and mortality, and may provide valuable information for prevention and early management of adverse outcomes.

Outcome Analysis Using the Modified Frailty Index-5 in Patients With Complex Aortoiliac Disease

OBJECTIVES

Vascular surgery patients commonly have several comorbidities that cumulatively lead to a frailty status. The cumulative comorbidities disproportionately increase the risk of adverse events and are also associated with worsened long-term prognosis. In recent years, several tools have been elaborated with the objective of quantifying a patient's frailty. One of them is the modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5), a simplified and easy to use index. There is scarce data regarding its value as a prognostic factor in aortoiliac occlusive disease. The aim of this work is to validate mFI-5 as a potential postoperative prognostic indicator in this population.

METHODS

From January 2013 to January 2020, 109 patients who underwent elective revascularizations, either endovascular or open surgery, having Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II type D aortoiliac lesions in a tertiary and a regional hospital were selected from a prospective vascular registry. Demographic data was collected including diabetes mellitus, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, arterial hypertension requiring medication and functional status. The 30-d and subsequent long-term surveillance outcomes were also collected including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE) and all-cause mortality were assessed in the 30-d post-procedure and in the subsequent long-term surveillance period. The mFI-5 was applied to this population to evaluate the prognostic impact of this frailty marker on mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

In the long-term follow-up, mFI-5 was significantly associated with MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 2.469; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.267-4.811; P = .008) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.585; 95% CI: 1.270-5.260; P = .009). However, there was no significant association with 30-day outcomes. Along with the presence of chronic kidney disease, mFI-5 was the prognostic factor better able of predicting MACE. No prognostic value was found regarding short-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The mFI-5 index may have a role in predicting long term outcomes, namely MACE and all-cause mortality, in the subset of patients with extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease. Its ease of use can foster its application in risk stratification and contribute for the decision-making process.

Considerations for carotid artery disease management in a frail population

Carotid artery stenosis is highly prevalent in older adults. Generally, symptomatic patients are treated with medical therapy and revascularization by either a carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid artery stent (CAS), or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). In asymptomatic patients it remains unclear whether revascularization is beneficial. Novel and less invasive techniques mitigate some of the risk of revascularization, allowing patients who previously were too high risk to now be candidates. Despite this, any invasive procedure has risks and potential for complications. Furthermore, it can be unclear whether certain patient populations, such as older adults and those with multiple chronic medical conditions will derive benefit from an intervention. Frailty is an assessment tool that can be used to guide decision-making process for older patients. In this review we discuss the management of carotid artery stenosis in older adults, its relationship with frailty, and how a frailty assessment can be integrated into the shared decision-making process to determine the optimal treatment plan for each patient.

An Invited Commentary "Prognostic effect of the new 5-factor modified frailty index in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia - A prospective cohort study"

Frailty has been studied as a valuable predictor of adverse health events and poor postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. Thus, the use of simple and adapted indexes to define frailty, like the modified frailty index (Mfi)-11, proved useful in assessing patients undergoing vascular surgery. The role of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) continues to be debated in the age of optimal medical therapy, particularly for patients with limited life expectancy (Rothenberg et al., 2020) [3]. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) measures frailty, a syndrome of decreased physiologic reserve, which increases vulnerability to adverse outcomes. However, the literature about the applicability of an even more pragmatic index, the modified frailty (mFi) index mFI-5 in vascular patients is scarce, particularly in those submitted to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study aimed to validate and estimate the prognostic value of the mFI-5 on the postoperative period and long-term survival of this population (Araújo-Andrade et al., 2020) [1].