Does bariatric surgery really benefit patients before total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of Prior Bariatric Surgery on the Outcomes of Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is a risk factor for joint arthroplasty complications. With this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed whether a positive history of bariatric surgery influences postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing various types of joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search database such as Scopus, PubMed, Medline Ovid, CNKI, and CENTRAL for studies comparing outcomes between patients undergoing arthroplasty with and without a history of bariatric surgery. We extracted data on short-term medical complications, venous thromboembolism (VTE), periprosthetic infections, superficial wound infections, hospital stay length, and operative time. We used the data to conduct meta-analyses using random-effects models and subgroup analyses based on the type of arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 studies with nearly 150,000 participants were included. The analysis showed that prior bariatric surgery did not significantly affect overall medical complications post-arthroplasty, with OR of 0.968 (95%CI, 0.706-1.327). For VTE, the results similarly indicated no substantial difference, with an OR of 0.912 (95%CI, 0.644-1.291). In assessing periprosthetic infections, the OR was 0.754 (95%CI, 0.535-1.064), showing comparable rates between patients with and without a history of bariatric surgery.Regarding superficial wound infections, the analysis produced an OR of 2.390 (95%CI, 0.723-7.897), indicating variability but not statistical significance. Hospital stay length was reduced in patients with a history of bariatric surgery, reflected by SMD of -0.113 (95%CI, -0.221 to -0.005). Lastly, operative time also showed a significant reduction, with an SMD of -0.462 (95%CI, -0.865 to -0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior bariatric surgery does not reduce the risk of short-term complications post-arthroplasty, but it seems to reduce the hospital stay length and operative time. The effects vary significantly across different types of joint arthroplasty, suggesting a need for tailored preoperative assessments and care protocols.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO, with the number: CRD42024539052.

[Current AWMF guidelines on knee and hip arthroplasty - individual risks]

BACKGROUND

In the year 2022, more than 300,000 total hip and knee primary arthroplasties were recorded in the German Arthroplasty Registry. The ever-increasing number of interventions naturally leads to an increase in the absolute number of possible complications. The abundance of internationally available data makes it possible to determine risk factors for postoperative complications.

RISK FACTORS

Professional societies involved in the German guidelines in the field of orthopedics place great emphasis on modifiable risk factors, as their adequate management can consequently reduce the likelihood of postoperative complications. One of the most common modifiable risk factors is obesity, with its prevalence remaining consistently high in most developed countries. In the field of orthopedics, the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany focuses on modifiable risk factors including obesity, diabetes mellitus and smoking.

OBESITY

In the case of obesity in particular, the guidelines for knee and hip arthroplasty recommend a weight loss attempt for patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m2. A BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 is considered a "relative contraindication" in the guidelines. Shared decision making is emphasized in both guidelines. Ultimately, the particularly critical individual assessment of risk and benefit for each obese patient remains crucial for the final decision.

Total Knee Arthroplasty With or Without Prior Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies comparing the outcomes of bariatric surgery followed by total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus TKA alone in obese patients have disparate results. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare TKA with and without prior bariatric surgery in obese patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase were searched from inception to April 9, 2023. There were twelve included studies that yielded 2,876,547 patients, of whom 62,818 and 2,813,729 underwent TKA with and without prior bariatric surgery, respectively. Primary outcomes were medical complications (ie, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, renal failure, respiratory failure, venous thromboembolism [VTE], arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, and stroke); surgical complications (ie, wound complications [eg, infection, hematoma, dehiscence, delayed wound healing, and seroma], periprosthetic joint infection, mechanical complications, periprosthetic fracture, knee stiffness, and failed hardware); revision, and mortality. Secondary outcomes were blood transfusion, length of stay (day), and readmission.

RESULTS

The odds ratios (OR) of 90-day VTE (OR = 0.75 [0.66, 0.85], P < .00001), 90-day stroke (OR = 0.58 [0.41, 0.81], P = .002), and 1-year periprosthetic fracture (OR = 0.74 [0.55, 0.99], P = .04) were lower in those who underwent bariatric surgery before TKA. Although the mean difference in hospital stays (-0.19 days [-0.23, -0.15], P < .00001) was statistically less in those who underwent bariatric surgery before TKA, it was not clinically relevant. The other outcomes were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery before TKA is beneficial in terms of a lower risk of VTE, stroke, and periprosthetic fracture. This analysis suggests surgeons consider discussing bariatric surgery before TKA in obese patients, especially those who are at risk of VTE and stroke.

Association between bariatric surgery and outcomes of total joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Background:

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) alongside bariatric surgery (BS) is frequently operated on in obese arthritis patients. The controversy persists regarding BS before TJA, and the extent of its impact on the prognosis of TJA patients remains uncertain. To explore this, we conducted a meta-analysis.

Methods:

As of 1 October 2023, the latest search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted to compare outcomes between patients who underwent preoperative BS and those who did not. The analysis focused on parameters such as length of stay (LOS), infection risk, venous thromboembolism, revision, transfusions, dislocations, periprosthetic fractures, knee stiffness, medical complications, and all-cause mortality in the eligible studies.

Results:

This meta-analysis included 18 trials with a total of 292 196 patients. Pooled findings indicated that preoperative BS significantly shortened the LOS (MD, −0.16; 95% CI, −0.25 to 0.07; I 2=58%; P =0.0004) and increased the risk of dislocation within 90 days (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.20–2 .42; I 2=21%; P =0.003) and all-cause mortality within 30 days (OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.81–7.49; I 2= 0%; P  =0.0003) for TJA, in comparison with patients without BS. In the total hip arthroplasty (THA) subgroup, BS was more favorable, exhibiting significantly reduced risk of short-term revision (OR, 0.77; 95% CI , 0.61–0.99; I 2=0%; P =0.04) and long-term infection (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61–0.85; I 2=0%; P ≤0.0001). For total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients, no significant benefit was identified. In addition, there was no statistically significant correlation between preoperative or postoperative BS and the occurrence of complications in TJA patients.

Conclusions and Relevance:

Compared with the control group without BS, preoperative BS can shorten the LOS, increase the risk of dislocation within 90 days and all-cause mortality within 30 days in TJA, and reduce the risk of specific surgical complications in the THA subgroup but shows no significant difference in the TKA subgroup. There are no differences in clinical outcomes whether BS is performed before or after TJA. More high-quality trials are needed to further clarify the impact of BS on obese patients undergoing TJA.

Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor-1 Agonists Used for Medically-Supervised Weight Loss in Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Critical Considerations for the Arthroplasty Surgeon

Patients with morbid obesity and concomitant hip or knee osteoarthritis represent a challenging patient demographic to treat as these patients often present earlier in life, have more severe symptoms, and have worse surgical outcomes following total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Previously, bariatric and metabolic surgeries represented one of the few weight loss interventions that morbidly obese patients could undergo prior to total joint arthroplasty. However, data regarding the reduction in complications with preoperative bariatric surgery remain mixed. Glucagon-like peptide receptor-1 (GLP-1) agonists have emerged as an effective treatment option for obesity in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, recent data suggest these medications may serve as potential anti-inflammatory and disease-modifying agents for numerous chronic conditions, including osteoarthritis. This review will discuss the GLP-1 agonists and GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide dual agonists currently available, along with GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon triple agonists presently being developed to address the obesity epidemic. Furthermore, this review will address the potential problem of GLP-1-related delayed gastric emptying and its impact on the timing of elective total joint arthroplasty. The review aims to provide arthroplasty surgeons with a primer for implementing this class of medication in their current and future practice, including perioperative instructions and perioperative safety considerations when treating patients taking these medications.

Preoperative weight loss interventions before total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The high co-prevalence of obesity and end-stage osteoarthritis requiring arthroplasty, with the former being a risk factor for complications during arthroplasty, has led to increasing interest in employing preoperative weight loss interventions such as bariatric surgery and diet modification. However, the current evidence is conflicting, and this study aimed to investigate the effect of weight loss intervention before arthroplasty in prospective randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for prospective randomized controlled trials that compared weight loss interventions with usual care from inception to October 2023 by following the PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE framework were used to assess the quality of the studies. Meta-analyses were performed when sufficient data were available from 2 or more studies.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials involving 198 patients were identified. Two studies employed diet modification, and one study utilized bariatric surgery. All three studies reported significant reductions in body weight and body mass index (BMI), and intervention groups had fewer postoperative complications. There was no difference in the length of stay between the intervention group and the control group. Variable patient-reported outcome measures were used by different research groups.

CONCLUSION

Weight loss intervention can achieve significant reductions in body weight and body mass index before arthroplasty, with fewer postoperative complications reported. Further studies with different populations could confirm the effect of these interventions among populations with different obesity characteristics.

Role of bariatric surgery in reducing periprosthetic joint infections in total knee arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity represents an epidemic of rising numbers worldwide year after year. In the Orthopedic field, obesity is one of the major causes leading to osteoarthritis needing Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA). Still, contextually, it represents one of the most significant risk factors for joint replacement complications and failures. So, bariatric Surgery (BS) is becoming a valuable option for weight control and mitigating obesity-related risk factors. This review of the literature and meta-analysis aims to evaluate periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) and surgical site infections (SSI) rates in patients who underwent TKA after BS compared to obese patients without BS.

METHODS

Systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines up to October 2023. We included longitudinal studies comparing obese patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty after bariatric surgery (study group) and obese patients who underwent TKA (control group). The surgical site infection and Periprosthetic joint infection rate were compared among groups using a meta-analytical approach.

RESULTS

The online database and references investigation identified one hundred and twenty-five studies. PJI rate differed significantly among groups, (z = -21.8928, p < 0.0001), with a lower risk in the BS group (z = -10.3114, p < 0.0001), for SSI, instead, not statistically significance were recorded (z = -0.6784, p = 0.4975).

CONCLUSIONS

The current Literature suggests that Bariatric Surgery can reduce infectious complications in TKA, leading to better outcomes and less related costs treating of knee osteoarthritis in obese patients.

Osteoarthritis in patients with obesity: The bariatric surgery impacts on its evolution

Obesity is one of the main modifiable risk factors for osteoarthritis (OA). Moreover, obesity is associated with greater pain intensity and functional limitation, but also with a significantly lower responder rate to intra-articular treatments. Consequently, an arthroplasty is indicated earlier and more frequently in patients with obesity. However, pain and functional symptoms improve slightly less after arthroplasty in patients with obesity, who display higher incidence of early and late complications following prosthetic surgery. Bariatric surgery (BS) has increased worldwide and is efficient to induce major and sustainable weight-loss. Importantly, BS significantly reduces pain and functional limitation in patients with symptomatic knee OA. Biomarkers analysis also revealed a decrease in catabolic factors and an increase in anabolic one after BS suggesting a structural protective effect in knee OA. Nevertheless, the impact of BS prior to arthroplasty remains unclear. BS seems to decrease short- and mid-term complications such as infections or thrombosis. However, BS does not appear to modify long-term complications rate, and may even increase it, especially revisions and infections. Although few studies have compared the symptomatic and functional outcomes of joint replacement with or without BS, these are not significantly improved by prior BS. Despite these heterogeneous results, medico-economic studies found that BS prior to arthroplasty was cost-effective. To conclude, BS could significantly reduce the symptoms of OA and potentially slow its progression, but appears more disappointing in preventing long-term complications of arthroplasties and improving their functional results.