Utility of quantitative real time PCR in detection and monitoring of viral infections in post renal transplant recipients

Risk factors and outcome of concurrent and sequential multiviral cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, BK virus, adenovirus and other viral reactivations in transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Reactivation of viral infections occurs frequently in immunosuppressed populations, particularly in solid organ (SOT) or allogeneic haematopoietic cell (HCT) transplant patients. Concurrent and sequential multivirus infections are common, yet risk factors and outcomes remain unclear. This review aims to identify the patients vulnerable to multivirus infections and characterize the impact of increased viral burden to formulate prevention and treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Incidences of up to 89% in SOT and 36% in HCT have been reported for two viruses, and 32% in SOT and 28% in HCT for at least three viruses. Risk factors appear related to an increased burden of immunosuppression, with most viral coinfections occurring within 12 months of transplantation. Direct viral complications such as cytomegalovirus disease are more frequent in coinfected patients, with documented prolonged duration of viraemia, higher viral load and increased end-organ disease. Graft dysfunction, acute rejection and graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) have also been associated. Increased mortality is reported in the HCT population.

SUMMARY

Multivirus infections occur in a significant proportion of transplant patients and is linked to immunosuppressive burden. There is increasing evidence that this leads to worse graft and patient outcomes. Further prospective studies are required to further comprehensively characterise viral epidemiology, mechanisms and treatment strategies to ameliorate this risk.

The Role of Coinfections in the EBV-Host Broken Equilibrium

The Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a well-adapted human virus, and its infection is exclusive to our species, generally beginning in the childhood and then persisting throughout the life of most of the affected adults. Although this infection generally remains asymptomatic, EBV can trigger life-threatening conditions under unclear circumstances. The EBV lifecycle is characterized by interactions with other viruses or bacteria, which increases the probability of awakening its pathobiont capacity. For instance, EBV infects B cells with the potential to alter the germinal center reaction (GCR)—an adaptive immune structure wherein mutagenic-driven processes take place. HIV- and Plasmodium falciparum-induced B cell hyperactivation also feeds the GCR. These agents, along with the B cell tropic KSHV, converge in the ontogeny of germinal center (GC) or post-GC lymphomas. EBV oral transmission facilitates interactions with local bacteria and HPV, thereby increasing the risk of periodontal diseases and head and neck carcinomas. It is less clear as to how EBV is localized in the stomach, but together with Helicobacter pylori, they are known to be responsible for gastric cancer. Perhaps this mechanism is reminiscent of the local inflammation that attracts different herpesviruses and enhances graft damage and chances of rejection in transplanted patients. In this review, we discussed the existing evidence suggestive of EBV possessing the potential to synergize or cooperate with these agents to trigger or worsen the disease.

Coinfection rates and clinical outcome data for cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in post-transplant patients: A systematic review of the literature

Background

In transplant recipients, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection increases morbidity and mortality; furthermore, coinfection with other human herpesviruses like the Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) may complicate their management. This systematic literature review aimed to summarize rates of CMV‐EBV coinfection and associated clinical outcomes among solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.

Methods

An electronic literature search was performed using pre‐specified search strategies (January 1, 2010‐October 31, 2018) and following established/best practice methodology. Of 316 publications identified, 294 did not report CMV‐EBV coinfection and were excluded. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were further analyzed. Due to limited reporting/heterogeneity, data were not meta‐analyzable.

Results

Nine studies (six SOT; three HSCT) reported CMV‐EBV coinfection; rates of coinfection post transplantation varied between 2.6% and 32.7%. Two studies indicated CMV reactivation to be an independent variable associated with EBV reactivation. Among SOT studies, higher rates of graft dysfunction (47.4% vs 22.9%), rejection episodes (20.0% vs 8.9%), or acute rejection (50.0% vs 31.0%) were reported for patients with coinfection than without. In HSCT studies, patients with graft‐vs‐host disease were not reported separately for coinfection. Two studies described cases of post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in patients with CMV‐EBV coinfection and reported rates of PTLD of 92% and 100%.

Conclusion

The CMV‐EBV coinfection rate in HSCT and SOT recipients varied and was associated with increased graft rejection and PTLD compared with patients without coinfection. Further research may improve understanding of the burden of CMV‐EBV coinfection among transplant recipients.