Donor non-specific MICA antibodies in renal transplant recipients

Non-invasive molecular biomarkers for monitoring solid organ transplantation: A comprehensive overview

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving intervention for individuals with end-stage organ failure. Despite the effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy, the risk of graft rejection persists in all viable transplants between individuals. The risk of rejection may vary depending on the degree of compatibility between the donor and recipient for both human leucocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA gene-encoded products. Monitoring the status of the allograft is a critical aspect of post-transplant management, with invasive biopsies being the standard of care for detecting rejection. Non-invasive biomarkers are increasingly being recognized as valuable tools for aiding in the detection of graft rejection, monitoring graft status and evaluating the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy. Here, we focus on the importance of molecular biomarkers in solid organ transplantation and their potential role in clinical practice. Conventional molecular biomarkers used in transplantation include HLA typing, detection of anti-HLA antibodies, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genotypes, and anti-MHC class 1-related chain A antibodies, which are important for assessing the compatibility of the donor and recipient. Emerging molecular biomarkers include the detection of donor-derived cell-free DNA, microRNAs (regulation of gene expression), exosomes (small vesicles secreted by cells), and kidney solid organ response test, in the recipient's blood for early signs of rejection. This review highlights the strengths and limitations of these molecular biomarkers and their potential role in improving transplant outcomes.

Non-HLA donor-recipient mismatches in kidney transplantation-A stone left unturned

In kidney transplantation, short-term allograft survival has improved due to improvements in acute rejection episodes without corresponding improvements in long-term survival. Although current organ allocation algorithms take into account human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching to reduce antidonor alloimmune responses, it is likely that genomic variation at non-HLA loci (ie, non-HLA donor-recipient [D-R] pair mismatches) play a role in the "non-self" responses and ultimately affect long-term allograft survival. Existing data from both animal models and human studies suggest an association between non-HLA D-R mismatches and kidney allograft outcomes. In this minireview, we examine existing and emerging data and discuss putative mechanisms on the role of non-HLA D-R mismatches on long-term allograft outcomes in kidney transplantation.

Bortezomib as a Novel Approach to Early Recurrent Membranous Glomerulonephritis After Kidney Transplant Refractory to Combined Conventional Rituximab Therapy

We report a case of early recurrent membranous glomerulonephritis after kidney transplant from a deceased donor. The patient received induction therapy and was discharged with a serum creatinine level of 0.78 mg/dL on triple maintenance immunosuppressive therapy, which included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. At 7 months after transplant, a graft biopsy for new-onset isolated proteinuria (2.7 g/day) revealed stage 2 recurrent membranous glomerulonephritis. In the face of persistent proteinuria despite combined conservative rituximab therapy over several months and the total eradication of CD20-positive cells, bortezomib was introduced. This resulted in a substantial decline in proteinuria within 2 months and its subsequent disappearance several months later. This was paralleled by a considerable drop in plasma CD34-positive and CD138-positive cell counts. These preliminary observations indicate that recurrent posttransplant membranous glomerulonephritis is associated in part with a B-cell- mediated immunologic process that may involve both CD20-positive and plasma cells. Rituximab-resistant or partially responsive recurrent posttransplant membranous glomerulonephritis may benefit from a proteasome inhibitor-based therapy.

MICA and NKG2D: Is There an Impact on Kidney Transplant Outcome?

This paper aims to present an overview of MICA and natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) genetic and functional interactions and their impact on kidney transplant outcome. Organ transplantation has gone from what can accurately be called a “clinical experiment” to a routine and reliable practice, which has proven to be clinically relevant, life-saving and cost-effective when compared with non-transplantation management strategies of both chronic and acute end-stage organ failures. The kidney is the most frequently transplanted organ in the world (transplant-observatory¹). The two treatment options for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are dialysis and/or transplantation. Compared with dialysis, transplantation is associated with significant improvements in quality of life and overall longevity. A strong relationship exists between allograft loss and human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibodies (Abs). HLA Abs are not the only factor involved in graft loss, as multiple studies have shown that non-HLA antigens are also involved, even when a patient has a good HLA matche and receives standard immunosuppressive therapy. A deeper understanding of other biomarkers is therefore important, as it is likely to lead to better monitoring (and consequent success) of organ transplants. The objective is to fill the void left by extensive reviews that do not often dive this deep into the importance of MICA and NKG2D in allograft acceptance and their partnership in the immune response. There are few papers that explore the relationship between these two protagonists when it comes to kidney transplantation. This is especially true for the role of NKG2D in kidney transplantation. These reasons give a special importance to this review, which aims to be a helpful tool in the hands of researchers in this field.

ABO incompatible renal transplants and decreased likelihood for developing immune responses to HLA and kidney self-antigens

Immune responses to HLA and tissue-restricted self-antigens (SAgs) have been proposed to play a role in the pathogenesis of renal allograft (KTx) rejection. However, ABO incompatible (ABOi) KTx recipients (KTxR) following depletion of antibodies (Abs) to blood group antigens had fewer rejections. To determine the mechanisms, pre- and post-transplant sera from ABOi (n=18) and ABO-compatible (ABOc) (n=45) KTxR were analyzed for Abs against HLA class I and II by LABScreen single antigen assay. The development of Abs to SAgs was measured by ELISA. Immunity to Collagen IV (Col-IV) and cytokines induced were measured by ELISPOT. While 8/45 (18%) ABOc KTxR developed new donor specific antibodies to HLA (DSA) following transplantation, 0/18 ABOi KTxR developed DSA. ABOi KTxR failed to develop Abs to kidney SAgs (Col-IV and fibronectin (FN)). In contrast, 7 ABOc KTxR developed Abs to both Col-IV and FN. Col-IV stimulation of lymphocytes from ABOc KTxR demonstrated increased IFNγ, IL-17 and decreased IL-10. In contrast ABOi recipients following stimulation with antigens resulted in more IL10 and reduced IFN-γ and IL17 production. At one year, the GFR in ABOi KTxR were significantly better (p<0.04) than ABOc KTxR. De novo DSA and immune responses to SAgs are reduced or absent in ABOi KTxR which we propose leads to less acute rejection and better long term function following ABOi KTx.

Humoral Immune Response and Allograft Function in Kidney Transplantation

HLA antibodies can damage a kidney transplant. In January 2013, consensus guidelines from The Transplantation Society were published regarding technical aspects of HLA antibody determination, as well as their potential significance in the pre- and posttransplantation periods. During the past 2 years, new studies have been reported, but controversies remain. In this article, these new data related to HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation are reviewed and compared to relevant prior research. Pretransplantation sensitization issues are discussed, including the new more sensitive assays (flow cytometry and solid-phase immunoassays such as Luminex single-antigen bead assays). A positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch remains an absolute contraindication to transplantation, although a positive flow cytometry crossmatch is only a relative contraindication. Positivity only by solid-phase assays increases the risk for acute rejection and transplant loss, but acceptable cutoffs are not defined. The sensitizing effect of red blood cell transfusions is substantiated. Following allograft failure, continued immunosuppression decreases the risk of sensitization, whereas overall, the effect of nephrectomy remains uncertain. Regarding the posttransplantation period, new data are available concerning the timing and significance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Whereas some centers report DSA appearance after years, others detect DSA within months. The prominence of class II DSA, especially DQ, in the posttransplantation period is noted. The relevance of non-HLA antibodies is discussed, including anti-endothelial cell antibodies, major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related protein A antibodies, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor autoantibodies.