Lights and shadows of anti-HLA antibodies detected by solid-phase assay

"Transplantomics" for predicting allograft rejection: real-life applications and new strategies from Network Medicine

Although decades of the reductionist approach achieved great milestones in optimizing the immunosuppression therapy, traditional clinical parameters still fail in predicting both acute and chronic (mainly) rejection events leading to higher rates across all solid organ transplants. To clarify the underlying immune-related cellular and molecular mechanisms, current biomedical research is increasingly focusing on "transplantomics" which relies on a huge quantity of big data deriving from genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics platforms. The AlloMap (gene expression) and the AlloSure (donor-derived cell-free DNA) tests represent two successful examples of how omics and liquid biopsy can really improve the precision medicine of heart and kidney transplantation. One of the major challenges in translating big data in clinically useful biomarkers is the integration and interpretation of the different layers of omics datasets. Network Medicine offers advanced bioinformatic-molecular strategies which were widely used to integrate large omics datasets and clinical information in end-stage patients to prioritize potential biomarkers and drug targets. The application of network-oriented approaches to clarify the complex nature of graft rejection is still in its infancy. Here, we briefly discuss the real-life clinical applications derived from omics datasets as well as novel opportunities for establishing predictive tests in solid organ transplantation. Also, we provide an original "graft rejection interactome" and propose network-oriented strategies which can be useful to improve precision medicine of solid organ transplantation.

Novel insights in the clinical management of hyperimmune patients before and after transplantation

Despite improvements in anti-Human Leucocyte Antigens antibody detection, identification, and characterization offer a better in peri-operative management techniques, antibodies remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality for patients both before and after organ transplantation. Hyperimmune patients are disadvantaged by having to wait longer to receive an organ from a suitably matched donor. They could benefit from desensitization protocols in both pre- and post-transplantation period. Clinical studies are underway to highlight which best desensitization strategies could be assure the best outcome in both heart and kidney transplantation. Although most clinical evidence about desensitization strategies by using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, interleukin-6 blockade, cysteine protease and complement inhibitors, comes from kidney transplantation studies, many of the debated novel concepts can be easily applied to desensitization also in heart transplantation. Here, we discuss the candidates and recipients' management by using most common standard of care and novel therapeutics, desensitization endpoints, and strategies for future studies.

Approaches for the characterization of clinically relevant pre-transplant human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in solid organ transplant patients

The avoidance of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) attributed to human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibody incompatibility remains an essential function of clinical Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (H&I) laboratories who are supporting solid organ transplantation. Developments in HLA antibody identification assays over the past thirty years have greatly reduced unexpected positive cellular crossmatches and improved solid organ transplant outcomes. For sensitized patients, the decision to register unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches is often heavily influenced by results from solid phase antibody assays, particularly the Luminex^® Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assays, although the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by these assays remains unclear. As such, the identification of non-clinically relevant antibodies may proportionally increase the number of unacceptable transplant mismatches registered, with an associated increase in waiting time for a compatible organ. We reflect on the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by the Luminex SAB^® assays and consider whether the application of additional assays and/or tools could further develop our ability to define the clinical relevance of antibodies identified in patient sera. Improvements in this area would assist equity of access to a compatible transplant for highly sensitized patients awaiting a solid organ transplant.

Factors affecting HLA expression: A review

The detection and semiquantitative measurement of circulating human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies is essential for the management of patients before and after transplantation. In addition, the pretransplant cross-match to assess the reactivity of recipient HLA antibody against donor lymphocytes has long been the gold standard to prevent hyperacute rejection. Whilst both of these tests assume that recipient HLA-specific antibody is the only variable in the assessment of transplant risk, this is not the case. Transplant immunologists recognize that some HLA antigens are expressed at levels a magnitude lower than others (e.g., HLA-C, HLA-DQ), but within loci, and between different cell types there are many factors that influence HLA expression in both resting and activated cells. HLA is not usually expressed without the specific promoter proteins NLRC5, for HLA class I, and CIITA, for class II. The quantity of HLA protein production is then affected by factors including promoter region polymorphisms, alternative exon splice sites, methylation and microRNA-directed degradation. Different loci are influenced by multiple combinations of these control mechanisms making prediction of HLA regulation difficult, but an ability to measure the cellular expression of each HLA antigen, in conjunction with knowledge of circulating HLA-specific antibody, would lead to a more informed algorithm to assess transplant risk.

Virtual Crossmatch: Reality of Perception

Results of 773 actual flow crossmatches (aFXMs) and virtual flow crossmatches (vFXMs) performed for living and deceased donor kidney transplantation in our center were analyzed retrospectively and evaluated for their concordance. Prediction of vFXMs was based on antibody identification using single antigen bead assay and locally established mean fluorescence intensity cutoff point compared with donor HLA antigens. The vast majority of aFXMs were in concordance with vFXMs with an overall concordance of 97%. Twenty-three predicted to be negative showed positive aFXMs; 12 of them had 0% calculated panel-reactive antibody, and 11 were found in patients with multiple non-donor-specific HLA antibodies. Three predicted positive vFXMs yielded negative aFXMs; 2 of them had allele-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: vFXMs based on precise characterization of antibody specificities detected by single antigen bead assay using our cutoff point accurately predicted FXMs in the majority of patients and can be used safely to allocate kidney offers without performing physical crossmatches in selected patients.

Anti-HLA Antibodies Testing on Solid Phase: Comparative Evaluation of Different Kit Vendors Through Luminex Technology

OBJECTIVES

For decades, the detection of anti-HLA antibodies in candidates for solid-organ transplant has been performed with the traditional complement-dependent cytotoxicity method; this assay has been then integrated with the introduction of solid-phase assays. Over the past 20 years, the Luminex assay has become the most widely used in clinical laboratories due to both increased sensitivity and specificity versus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. However, even the Luminex technique has shown some critical issues, and choosing the most reliable method still remains challenging. In this study, we verified the concordance of the results obtained in detecting anti-HLA antibodies with 2 kit vendors that provide reagents for the Luminex platform.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used 314 serum samples from patients on wait lists for solid-organ transplant. Sera were tested with LABScreen Mixed-LSM12 (One Lambda-Thermo Fisher, Canoga Park, CA, USA) and LIFECODES LifeScreen Deluxe-LMX (Gen-Probe-Immucor, Stanford, CT, USA),which we indicated as vendor A and vendor B, respectively. Anti-HLA class I and class II antibody analyses were conducted by verifying the concordance of the results with Cohen kappa coefficient statistics and confidence interval.

RESULTS

The kappa coefficient statistics showed "substantial" reliability for class I (0.61; confidence interval, 0.50-0.73) and "moderate" reliability for class II (0.56; confidence interval, 0.43-0.69). There were no considerable differences in results between the 2 kits regarding overall assignment of negativity or positivity of a sample. Discordant data between positive values for a test and negative for the other were found for samples with weak antibody positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Some discordant data were probably attributable to several factors such as the composition of the kits, the antibody titer in the serum, whether sera were diluted, different washing methods, and type of plate used.

Assessment of Spanish Panel Reactive Antibody Calculator and Potential Usefulness

Background and objectives

The calculated panel reactive of antibodies (cPRAs) necessary for kidney donor-pair exchange and highly sensitized programs are estimated using different panel reactive antibody (PRA) calculators based on big enough samples in Eurotransplant (EUTR), United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), and Canadian Transplant Registry (CTR) websites. However, those calculators can vary depending on the ethnic they are applied. Here, we develop a PRA calculator used in the Spanish Program of Transplant Access for Highly Sensitized patients (PATHI) and validate it with EUTR, UNOS, and CTR calculators.

Methods

The anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody profile of 42 sensitized patients on waiting list was defined, and cPRA was calculated with different PRA calculators.

Results

Despite different allelic frequencies derived from population differences in donor panel from each calculator, no differences in cPRA between the four calculators were observed. The PATHI calculator includes anti-DQA1 antibody profiles in cPRA calculation; however, no improvement in total cPRA calculation of highly sensitized patients was demonstrated.

Interpretation and conclusion

The PATHI calculator provides cPRA results comparable with those from EUTR, UNOS, and CTR calculators and serves as a tool to develop valid calculators in geographical and ethnic areas different from Europe, USA, and Canada.

Modulation of Donor-Specific Antibody Production After Organ Transplantation by Valproic Acid: A Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection, mediated by donor-specific antibodies, is emerging as a leading cause for allograft dysfunction in organ transplantation. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have potential immunosuppressive action, but their effects on antibody-mediated rejection and B cell function in organ transplantation have not been fully explored.

METHODS

The impacts of valproic acid (VPA), an HDACi, on isolated murine B cell proliferation, apoptosis, class switch recombination (CSR), differentiation, and secretion of immunoglobulin were investigated in vitro and in vivo. Molecular mechanisms were also explored by analyzing the expression of the activation-induced cytidinedeaminase, B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein-1 (Blimp-1/Pridm1), X-box-binding protein 1 and interferon-regulatory factor 4. Mouse cardiac transplant model was used to evaluate the regulatory effects of VPA on B cell response in vivo.

RESULTS

Valproic acid significantly inhibited B cell CSR, plasma cell differentiation, thereby reduced antibody generation in a dose-dependent manner without altering B cell proliferation and apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Activation-induced cytidinedeaminase, Blimp-1/Pridm1 and X-box-binding protein 1 expression were repressed by VPA treatment in a dose-dependent manner, whereas no obvious changes were observed on interferon-regulatory factor 4 expression. Although VPA alone did not prolong the graft medium survival time after murine heart transplantation, the low levels of donor-specific antibody, especially IgG in serum and the less numbers of plasma cells in the spleen were observed in VPA-treated mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Valproic acid inhibited B cell CSR and plasma cell differentiation in vitro and in nitrophenyl-chicken gamma globulin-immunized and heart transplant recipient mice. HDACi might be a therapeutic agent targeting B cell response after organ transplantation.

A reliable method for avoiding false negative results with Luminex single antigen beads; evidence of the prozone effect

Luminex single antigen bead (SAB) assays have become an essential tool in monitoring the status of antibody to the Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) of patients both before and after transplantation. In addition SAB data is used to aid risk stratification to assess immunological risk of humoral rejection in solid organ transplantation (CTAG/BTAG guidelines) [1]. Increasingly laboratories are reporting false negative results at high antibody titre due to a prozone effect. Here we report a case study where the prozone effect led to a false negative antibody result that could have resulted in adverse outcome. We describe a method to reliably remove the prozone effect through heat inactivation and the addition of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to the Luminex wash buffer.